Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 1 – Preliminary Remarks; The Jewish Identity; Cosmopolitan Propaganda

 Understanding the Jews,

 

Understanding Anti-Semitism

 

by Hervé Ryssen

Part 1

Paris, April 2012

 [Translated from French by Carlos Whitlock Porter]

 

 

Table of Contents

 

Preliminary Remarks…………………………………………………….. 4

I. The Jewish Identity……………………………………………………. 5

Perfectly Well Integrated” 

Assimilation or Dissimulation?

Jewish Solidarity

A Community Closed upon Itself

The Jewish Mission

Human Rights

The Jews and “Humanity

Esperanto

 

II. Cosmopolitan Propaganda……………………………………….. 13

The Advocacy of Race-Mixing and the “Open Society” 

Making Whites Feel Guilty

Destroy the Local Elites

Anti-Christianity

The Blacks Are Going to Save Humanity

The Races Do Not Exist

Your Lying Eyes

 

III. The New World Order…………………………………………….. 24

High Finance in the Service of Democracy

War Against Islam

Wars of Liberation

 

IV. Historical Traumas…………………………………………………. 31

The Trauma of the “Shoa

The Whole World is Guilty

The Spirit of Vengeance

Communism under Lenin

Communism under Stalin

May 1968

 

V. Anti-Semitism…………………………………………………………. 43

An “Inexplicable Phenomenon

The Scapegoat Theory

Denying the Evidence

The Inversion of Reality

The Good Deeds of the Jews

The Jealousy of the Anti-Semites

Always Innocent

Anti-Semitism: An Illness

The Madness of Men

Accusatory Projection

Hatred of Humanity

 

VI. The Mafia……………………………………………………………… 55

The Great Swindles

International Pimping

The Organ Traffic

 

VII. The Destruction of the Traditional Family……………….. 66

The Defense of Homosexuality

Cross-Dressers and Transsexuals

Feminism

The Destruction of All Patriarchy

 

VIII. The Psychopathology of “Anti-Semitism”………………. 72

Rapists and Psychos

Sexual Crimes Against Children

 

IX. At Last: Psychoanalysis Explained…………………………… 75

The Myth of the Oedipus Complex

 

X. The Hysterical Sect…………………………………………………. 81

Need for Love

Jewish Art

The Jewish Prison

The Symptoms of Insanity

The Suicidal Jew

 

 

 

 

Preliminary Remarks

 

The following text is a summary of six books [1] written by Hervé Ryssen [2], published between 2005 and 2010, constituting the most important study on the Jewish mind ever published. All the quotations that you are about to read are precisely referenced in at least one of these books.

 

The present booklet consists for the most part of quotations from famous authors, with particular emphasis on well-known films. The number of references is nevertheless sufficient to enable the reader to observe the extraordinary homogeneity of Jewish cosmopolitan thought, over the centuries and across all borders.

 

 

I

The Jewish Identity

 

The Jews are scattered over all the countries of the world, on all five continents, but they reside principally in ethnically European countries. Most of them are of “Ashkenazi” origin, that is, from Central and Eastern Europe, which they left in successive waves starting at the end of the 19th century. A minority, also scattered over the entire surface of the globe, come from the Mediterranean basin: these are the so-called “Sephardic” Jews. But there are also a few black Jews in Ethiopia, called “Fallashas”, as well as Jews in India and China, for example, who claim to be “perfectly well integrated”. The Jews are not, therefore, a race.

 

Judaism is not only not a religion — or not only — since many Jews declare themselves atheists; and are nonetheless no less “Jewish” for it. Marxist Jews in particular, who form the ruling elite in Western countries, are fanatical militants for atheism, according to the doctrines invented by one of their own: Karl Marx.

 

What, then, is Judaism? Let us ask Nahum Goldman, founder of the World Jewish Congress. From 1956 to 1968, Nahum Goldman was both President of the World Jewish Congress and President of the World Zionist Organisation. In 1976, he published a book entitled The Jewish Paradox. When someone asked him for his definition of Judaism, Nahum Goldman replied:

 

There is no entirely satisfactory definition… I remember having spoken at a conference when I was a student, during which I proposed more than twenty definitions: Judaism is a religion, a people, a nation, a cultural community, etc. No one definition is absolutely correct.

 

All the Jewish intellectuals who have approached the problem respond in the same way: Judaism, they invariably say, is an “enigma”, a “mystery”. These terms reappear regularly in nearly all Jewish writings. “The Jewish people do not know what they are”, wrote the philosopher Alain Finkelkraut (The Imaginary Jew). They are “an enigma to the contemporary mind” (Bernard-Henry Levy); they are a “mystery”, a “deeply distressing phenomenon” (Jean Daniel);

 

The Jews have been a living question mark to their surroundings for two thousand years” (André Glucksmann).

 

And all this — they think — despite the fact that they are supposed to be “God’s Chosen People”. While this doesn’t mean a lot to a goy, it is of utmost importance to a Jew.

 

 

Perfectly Well Integrated

 

Jews almost always claim to be “perfectly well integrated” into the countries in which they live, and they usually declare themselves to be “patriots”. Their own statements nevertheless indicate that, behind a facade of national identity, they continue to feel very Jewish, profoundly concerned with the interests of the Jewish community and the State of Israel.

 

In 1968, Bernard-Henry Levy, a well-known “French” philosopher who is very fond of media hype, declared, with regards to his book entitled The French Ideology — which was intended to make the French feel guilty — that:

 

I am a ‘Frenchman and, as a Frenchman, like no other French philosopher, I took the risk of conducting this inquiry into black France.’”

 

Twenty years later, in another book entitled “Recidivists”, published in 2004, he wrote that he felt;

 

“an extreme attachment to Israel… I am a Jew, of course, through my link to Israel. I am a Jew when, like all the world’s Jews, my heart beats in unison with those of the threatened Israelis”.

 

And he continues:

 

“I am a Jew, I am a Jew through every fibre of my being. I am a Jew through my slips of the tongue. I am a Jew for the alimentary rules which I have imposed upon myself … I am a Jew through my writing style … I am a Jew through this invisible pact which links me to the Jews of the whole world … I am a Jew through my Messianic patience.”

 

Examples of this kind are not hard to find, since nearly all Jewish intellectuals have expressed this same paradox in the same terms. The word “paradox” reappears regularly in the writings of all Jewish intellectuals, all over the world, throughout all history: this is not an accident.

 

 

Assimilation or Dissimulation?

 

The Jews have long been accustomed to adopt the dress of the people amongst whom they live. They speak the language of the country without foreign accent; they appear to adopt the local mores and customs. But they live in a world of their own, cut off from the world of goyim — “cattle”, “non-Jews”. They conceal themselves beneath borrowed identities for centuries, wearing the identity of their host peoples by day and becoming Jews again at night.

 

Many Jews change their names or transform their original family names, mimicking the local language. Thus, “Minkowski” becomes “Minc”; “Shapiro” becomes “Chapiraud” or “Chapier”. The make-up job may be exaggerated to a greater or lesser degree: “Aaron” becomes “Nora”, “Nussenbaum” becomes “Rochebrune”.

 

The actor Kirk Douglas (“Demsky”) preferred a Scottish name. The head of the French diplomatic service under President Sarkozy, Jean-David Levitt, is obviously a “Levi”.

 

 

Jewish Solidarity

 

The Jews exhibit an instinctive solidarity with their own people. This inclination is easily verified in the praises heaped by journalists upon Jewish artists and writers, whom they never hesitate to describe as “a genius”, their work as “sublime”, “incomparable”, etc. We are all, in fact, well aware of the tendency of Jewish intellectuals to cry “genius!” upon the discovery of almost any work by a fellow Jew.

 

Thus it is that second-rate writers like Philip Roth, Imre Kertesz, Yasmira Reza or Jonathan Littell are elevated to the rank of “geniuses of humanity”, raking in literary prizes in the process. Kafka, of course, becomes “the greatest writer in German history”, while Vassili Grossman becomes “the Tolstoy of the twentieth century”. Ironically, it is precisely through this very tendency to heap exaggerated praise on each other that we infallibly recognise Jewish journalists behind their pilfered cognomens.

 

The famous writer Elie Wiesel heartily confirms the notion that the Jews are a nation apart, and that it is correct to consider them “strangers” living amongst “other peoples”. In his book, Testament of a Murdered Jewish Poet (1980), he writes explicitly:

 

Between a Moroccan businessman and a chemist from Chicago, a rag dealer from Lodz, and an industrialist from Lyon, a kabbalist from Safed and an intellectual from Minsk, there is a deeper, more substantial blood relationship than between two citizens of the same country, the same city and the same profession. A Jew is never alone”.

 

 

A Community Closed Upon Itself

 

The Jews have always avoided mixing with the goyim. This is how they have always managed to survive over the centuries and persist where other civilizations have disappeared forever. The struggle against mixed marriages, in particular, is a constant priority. The Prime Minister of Israel, Golda Meir, declared:

 

The greatest danger threatening Jewish life comes not from anti-Semitism or persecution, but from assimilation and mixed marriages”.

 

Jewish intellectuals often repeat this slogan: the number of mixed marriages each year amounts to “several trainloads departing for Auschwitz”. Rabbis never tire of warning young Jews against this plague, while attempting to obtain from them the solemn promise to marry only another Jew.

 

On the other hand, it is very difficult for a goy to convert to Judaism. When a non-Jew wants to convert, it is the custom to discourage him, snub him, make him feel unwelcome. It is always simpler for a goyische woman to marry a Jew.

 

Jews live in the constant shadow of their own ghetto, associating with fellow Jews almost exclusively.

 

The ghetto is historically a Jewish invention”, writes Nahum Goldman. “It is incorrect to say that the goyim forced the Jews to separate themselves from their societies. By the time the Christians even noticed the existence of the ghettoes, the Jews were already living there.” This same truth has been expressed by many other Jews as well (see our History of Anti-Semitism, 2010).

 

In a book published in 1982 and prefaced by the Grand Rabbi of France, Ernest Gugenheim expresses this feeling of belonging: “Israel forms a united body into which its members are firmly welded”. Nahum Goldman cites the famous verse from the Talmud: “One single Jew is like all of Judaism”. This is why Jewish intellectuals often write “the Jew” to speak of the Jews.

 

Endogamous marriage is one reason for the amazing similarity in the facial characteristics of Jews all over the world. The very influential Alain Minc, for example, bears a very close resemblance to Paul Wolfowitz, one of the “hawks” in the American government during the Second Iraq War (2003). Elie Wiesel father bore an extraordinary resemblance to that of Bela Kun (Cohen), the leader of the Communist Revolution in Hungary in 1919. This explains the clichés observable in all “anti-Semitic cartoons” — particularly, cartoons published before WWII, when there was no plastic surgery and mixed marriages were less common.

 

In actual fact, however, the lugubrious warnings against mixed marriages issued by Jewish leaders the world over fail to prevent a significant number of Jews from marrying goyim. Sometimes their children are as Jewish as their parents, at least in spirit; but sometimes their Jewishness is lost, sometimes in the very first generation, if not later — a fact which fills the rabbis with anguish.

 

 

The Jewish Mission

 

The Jewish people consider themselves the bearers of a project governing humanity as a whole, a grandiose project which they have pursued for centuries, through and despite everything: the instauration on earth of universal and lasting peace. The notion of “peace”, in fact, lies at the very heart of Judaism: it is not by chance that this one word (“shalom”, in Hebrew) appears so frequently in the speech of all Jews, all over the world. It is not just a religious concept — one of a belief in God’s work in a distant future — but of a guiding principle which determines the commitments of Jews on a daily basis. It is in fact the Jews themselves, who, through their work, their actions, their involvement in politics, work each day for the construction of this “peace”.

 

In the perfect world which they believe they are creating, all conflict will have completely vanished from the face of the earth — particularly, conflict between nations. That is why, wherever they settle, Jews militate ceaselessly and untiringly for the elimination of all borders and the breakdown of all national identity. Nation states are the cause of war and disorder; they must, therefore, be hollowed out from within and without, and — in the long run — eliminated entirely, replaced by World Government, solely capable of bringing about the reign of human felicity and endless prosperity on Earth.

 

The aim is to unify the world by all means possible, levelling all cultural differences, which are believed to be the source of conflict. Jewish intellectuals, all over the world, work without letup for this ideal. Whether Left or Right, Marxist or liberal, believers or atheists, Zionists or “perfectly integrated”, Jews are the world’s most fervent advocates of this messianic global empire.

 

Judaism is, therefore, essentially a universalist political project, the objective of which is the unification of the world, as the prelude to global pacification. It is a long, difficult job, they admit, but the Jews are absolutely convinced that they can succeed in achieving this aim, obsessed, as they are, with the “Mission” entrusted to them by God. Or as the prophet Isaiah puts it:

 

The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them…” (Isaiah, XI, 6-9).

 

Contrary to Christianity or Islam, the Jews do not intend to convert others to Judaism; rather, the intend simply to persuade them to renounce their religion, their race, their identity, their family and all their traditions, in the name of “Humanity”, and “Human Rights”. This Global Empire, in fact, can only be built upon the ruins of great civilizations, using the human detritus produced by so-called “democratic societies” and the capitalist system.

 

Cosmopolitan” (i.e., Jewish) propaganda always aims at the dissolution of all ancestral values and identities, so as to eliminate the supposed “sources of conflict between men”. The Jews militate continually towards this goal. The Jews are a people of propagandists. It is not an accident that they have been highly successful in all of our contemporary media-obsessed “democratic” societies. When only the remaining Jews on Earth shall have preserved their faith and traditions, only then will they be finally recognised by all as “God’s Chosen People”. Only then will their long-awaited Messiah finally arrive and re-establish “the Kingdom of David”.

 

This Messianic “Waiting for Godeau” is the driving force of Judaism, since it obliges every Jew to struggle actively to “hasten the coming of the Messiah” (this is a very common expression). It is from this Messianic tension that the Jews derive their strength and energy. It is in fact the Jews themselves who, through heir militancy, their untiring egalitarian propaganda in favour of a “world without borders”, are fated to establish the world of “peace” to hasten the arrival of the Messiah.

 

 

Human Rights

 

The concept of “Human Rights” is a very effective weapon in advancing the idea of “world unification”. The “father” of the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, in 1948, was a certain René Cassin. It was he who was responsible for establishing the Constitution of the French Fifth Republic after the return of Charles de Gaulle in 1958. René Cassin was the President of the European Court of Human Rights, and was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1968. He was also a doctor honoris causa of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and President of the Universal Israelite Alliance from 1943 until his death in 1976. “Human Rights”, he said, are a “laicisation of the principles of Judaism”. This was confirmed by Grand Rabbi Jacob Kaplan:

 

To find the seminal sources of [the French Revolution of] 1789, one must go back beyond classical antiquity, to the Bible, the Torah and the prophets”. Rene Cassin also envisaged a sort of “Universal Ministry of Education”.

 

These projects were only concretised after the war, through the creation of UNESCO.

 

 

The Jews and “Humanity

 

It is interesting to note that Jewish intellectuals — who are always talking about “Humanity” — instinctively confuse themselves — the Jews — with “Humanity”.

 

Elie Wiesel writes as follows:

 

To save our people, we must save all of humanity”.

 

Kafka said:

 

Whosoever strikes a Jew knocks all of humanity to the ground”.

 

Nahum Goldman expressed the same idea this way:

 

It is in the interests of all of humanity that the Jewish people must not disappear”, he said, since the Jews are the bearer of “values which concern all of humanity”.

 

In his book Five New Lectures on the Talmud (1977) the philosopher Emmanuel Levinas projects Jewish singularity onto a universal level, and speaks of, “the suffering of Israel as universal suffering”.

 

Jacques Attali says the same thing in The Jews, The World and Money (2002):

 

A misfortune for the Jewish people is a misfortune for all men”, taking the same logic even further:

The disappearance of the Temple was also a tragedy for all non-Jews, since the Hebrews prayed for them: they know not what they have lost”.

 

Elie Wiesel was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in late 1986. In his “Oslo Speech”, pronounced on this occasion, he spoke — as was his custom — of “Hope”, of “Humanity” and “Peace” on Earth:

 

Jewish suffering should be of concern to all of humanity. The day will come when crimes against the Jews will be considered crimes against humanity, and crimes against humanity as crimes against the Jewish people”.

 

Under these conditions, “anti-Semitism” is not just a “Jewish matter”: it is a matter of concern to “Everyone”.

 

[Image] Elie Wiesel gives a speech after the Nobel awarding ceremonies on December 11, 1986.

 

 

Esperanto

 

The elimination of borders is an ideal to be attained, but the “open” society will only be viable on the condition of the annihilation of all instincts of race and local characteristics. The “pure races” must be “mixed” to dissolve all feeling of identity, which is considered likely to engender the resurgence of “Nationalism”. Languages themselves must disappear, to the benefit of one single common language.

 

This was the great ambition of Louis Lazaré Zamenhof. A young man descended from the Jewish aristocracy of Poland, his entire life was dedicated, from a very early age, to the invention of a language which was to be understood by everyone, based on common roots from most of the wide-spread languages.

 

[Image] Esperanto: 150th anniversary of its creator Lazarus Zamenhof, December 16, 2009

 

This dream led to the publication of the founding work of Esperanto, Fundamento de Esperanto in 1887. Zamenhof explained:

 

If I were not a Jew from the ghetto, the idea of uniting humanity either would never have entered my mind, or would not have obsessed me so obstinately throughout my entire life”.

 

And he repeated:

 

My Jewishness was the principal cause for which I dedicated myself to one idea and to an essential dream, from my youngest childhood, the dream of uniting humanity.

 

 

 

 

II

 

Cosmopolitan Propaganda

 

There are different ways to “pacify” men and nations. Carpet bombing, or Soviet totalitarianism, is one way. But “liberal democracy” and the “consumer society” work much better.

 

 

The Advocacy of Race-Mixing and the “Open Society

 

Jews have always encouraged immigration into all the countries in which they have ever settled, not just because a multicultural society corresponds to their politico-religious plans, but also because the resulting dissolution of national identity protects them from any “nationalistic” upheavals. All Jewish intellectuals — absolutely without exception — are focused on this question of the “plural” society and are obsessed with ceaseless “anti-racist vigilance”, regardless of any other political differences. Immigration from the Third World is thus presented as “an economic necessity”, an “indispensable contribution”, an “extraordinary enrichment”, etc.

 

Jewish intellectuals exhibit a certain characteristic inclination towards enormous untruths.

 

They will tell you, for example, that immigration hasn’t really increased at all; on the contrary, it has never been so low! This inclination to treat the goyim like a load of simple-minded fools is called “chutzpah” (pronounced with a German-style guttural “r”). The demographer Gerard Noiriel, the essayist Guy Sorman, the sociologist Edgar Morin (Nahoum), the philosopher Alain Finkelkraut and diplomat Stephane Hessel, for example, became famous for these little exercises.

 

To the general public, this unceasing, indefatigable, planetary propaganda is most obvious in film production.

 

All Jewish film producers have released at least one or more films advocating race-mixing and the “multicultural society”.

 

Just watch the films by Claude Longmann, known as “Berri” (One Stays, The Other Leaves); Matthieu Kassovitz (Café au lait, White Nightmare);

Claude Lelouch (Itinerary of a Spoilt Child; Smic Smac Smoc);

Francois Luciani (The Man Who Came from Somewhere Else);

Edouard Molinaro (The Hearts of Men);

Gerard Oury — at the end of The Adventures of Rabbi Jacob, the Arab Slimane, naturally, marries Pivert’s daughter;

Robert Guédignan (Where the Heart Is).

 

Guédignan also produced Marius and Jeanette, in which the main character, Jeanette, lives alone in Marseilles with her two children, fathered by two different men. The older daughter has been duped by a cad who deserted her — a white man (naturally) — while her 12-year old is an African half-caste who “works very well at school”, etc.

 

Renaud Cohen is a small-time producer, but his film Once We Grow Up (2001) is rather eloquent: the main character, Simon Dadoun, is a thirty-year old Jewish journalist. He breaks up with his girl friend (a goy) and meets a Sephardic Jewess, like himself. The French, by contrast, are depicted as much inclined towards race-mixing: Both of Simon Dadoun’s friends, in fact, are interracially married: one to an Asian, the other to a Senegalese. The same film also defends lesbianism — again — in a highly “multicultural” context.

 

Or just watch the films by Bernard Stora (Another Life);

Giles Pacquet-Brenner (Gomez and Tavares);

Daniel Vignes (Fatou from Mali);

Dominique Baron (The Tress of Aminata);

Cedric Kahn (Too Much Happiness);

Nicolas Ribowski (Perigord Noir), etc.

 

In The Enchanted Parentheses (1999), by Michael Spinosa, the French are once again depicted as fated to mate with Blacks and Orientals. The producer also depicts adultery, Marxism, feminism, etc., with great indulgence.

 

American” Jewish film producers are obsessed with these same things as well. You really must see films like Roland Emmerich’s (The Day After Tomorrow, 2004), or Marc Forster’s (Monster’s Ball).

 

In Love Field (1993), Jonathan Kaplan tells the story of a beautiful blonde who leaves her idiot of a husband and falls in love with a Black.

 

In Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967), a young beauty introduces her husband to her parents. Her husband is a Black, likeable, cultured, intelligent. His natural charm and niceness overcome the instinctive and vicious mistrust of her bourgeois white parents. The film, by Stanley Kramer, naturally won ten Oscar nominations.

 

You can go much further back than that if you wish:

 

West Side Story, by Robert Wise (1961), is a musical propaganda film in favour of the “multicultural society”.

 

In 1950, No Way Out told the story of a black intern in a hospital. It was a plea against “racism” by Joseph Mankiewicz.

 

Today, early in the 21st century, this propaganda is becoming even more extreme. The television series “Life’s So Sweet” shows young white women mating with Blacks, while young white men are depicted as homosexuals.

 

All the screen plays for the films listed above were written by Olivier Schulzinger; in fact, any time you see a white woman paired off with a Negro on the screen, you can be very sure that you’re watching something produced by the “Chosen Ones”. As we can easily see, the Jews are totally obsessed with race-mixing and ethnic mixing; but one must, of course, bear in mind that this “line of goods” is intended for “export only”.

 

 

Making Whites Feel Guilty

 

Cosmopolitan” film producers work untiringly to make Europeans feel profoundly guilty for their past, to make them ashamed of what they are. All these incessant “sensitisation” campaigns on topics like “slavery”, “colonialism”, the “looting of the Third World”, “global warming”, “Auschwitz”, etc., have one object — and one object only — and that is to bring about the advent of world government.

 

In “cosmopolitan” Jewish cinema, psychopaths and villains are invariably depicted as possessing typically Nordic traits, complete with blonde hair and blue eyes. This is not an accident. In The Crimson Rivers (2000), for example, Matthieu Kassovitz shows us dangerous “neo-Nazis” torturing and massacring innocent people.

 

Six-Pack (1999) is a film by Alain Berberian: a Parisian commissioner of police is anxious to capture a serial killer who has already killed and mutilated five young women. The “bad guys” (the chief of police, the psychopath) are played by Nordics, while the “good guys” (Commissioner Nathan, Inspector Saul), are, once again, are played by very typical Mediterranean-types.

 

American” film directors are animated by all these same hatreds. In Panic Room (2001), by David Fincher, three criminals break into a house. The gang leader is a white man, a very frightening, unpredictable, highly nervous person, who ends up with a bullet in the head. The second criminal — another white man — seems very calm, but is, in reality, an extremely dangerous psychopath and “mad-dog killer”. The third, a Negro, is intelligent and humane.

 

None of this is by accident.

See Runaway Jury, by Garry Fleder;

The Green Line, by Frank “Darabont;

Fatal Obsession, by Jonathan Kaplan;

Ragtime, by Milos Forman;

or Barton Fink, by the Cohen Brothers, and you will see that the “bad guys” are systematically depicted as white men, and white men only.

 

In Cop Land (1995), by the extremely sly James “Mangold (Goldman), the “bad guys” are all white cops, while on the other side of the river, in New York, the “multiracial” police are portrayed with the greatest sympathy.

 

In the comedy entitled Addams Family Values (1993) the characters whom the audience initially mistakes for the “bad guys” — real villains — are, in fact, very nice (with very black hair), while the “bad guys” are invariably blonde-haired children. The film is by Barry Sonnenfeld.

 

Mississippi Burning (1988) by Alan Parker, is an attack on the Ku Klux Klan. In a little village in the southern United States, the whites are all bigoted, racially-prejudiced cowards, narrow-minded, evil, and downright contemptible. The women are depicted as intimidated, bullied into submission, dreaming only of escape.

 

In Alien 3 (1992), a space ship crashes on a planet where the “Company” once built a penitentiary for dangerous criminals: killers, rapists, and psychopaths. The “bad guys” attempting to rape the heroine are, of course, all white, while the “good guy” who rescues her from this terrifying predicament is a huge Negro, the only mentally-balanced person among the prisoners: he’s the boss. This film was also produced by an “alien”: David Fincher.

 

In the 1960s, Jewish film makers did everything they could to make White people feel guilty. Just watch films like;

 

In the Heat of the Night (1967), by Normal Jewison (who won five Oscars for it);

The Cardinal (1963), by Otto Preminger;

or Wild River by Elia Kazan (1960).

 

In Betrayed (USA, 1989), Constantin Costa-Gavras denounces the paramilitary militia of the American “Extreme Right”: a beautiful young FBI agent, a woman, is ordered to infiltrate them. The main villain, “Gary”, falls quickly in love with her, and reveals his true nature as a dangerous psychopath with blue eyes. The “Right-Wing” militia groups, we learn, are supported by powerful financiers and major political figures!

 

Harping on this same ridiculous theme of “Fascism in the Service of Big Money” is a characteristic of several other films.

 

In The Inheritor, by Philippe Labro (France, 1972), the hero (Jean-Paul Belmondo) returns to the USA to inherit an industrial empire. He discovers that his father had been murdered by his father-in-law, the director of an industrial group who is also the financier behind a “neo-Fascist” party. At least that’s what the director — (Jacques Lanzmann) would like to have us to believe…

 

In A Billion Dollars (France, 1981), a journalist discovers that GT1, a multinational corporation, worked for the Nazis. Since his boss refuses to continue the inquiry, the journalist goes into hiding and the article is published by a small local newspaper. The big newspapers, of course, are entirely controlled by “fascists”. The film is by Henri Verneuil (Achod Malakian), who was not a “fascist”. … This is what is called “accusatory inversion”, i.e., “Freudian projection”.

 

 

Destroy the Local Elites

 

Cosmopolitan” propaganda is always aimed at destroying all local elites, whatever and wherever they are: encouraging the workers to revolt against their employers, the peasants against the lords. All authority is discredited, ancestral traditions are bespattered and ridiculed, and the “bourgeoisie” and “aristocrats” are always depicted in the darkest colours.

 

The Dead Poets Society was filmed in 1990. The film shows us an elite boarding school in the USA, an old and noble institution intended for the sons of high society. A literature professor upsets the lives of the students and dynamites the “dusty old values” of these “narrow-minded Christians”. This film, which invites us to reject traditions and norms, was directed by Peter Weir.

 

This is also the message of a film called School Ties by Robert Mandel (1992): The main character, “David Greene” joins one of the most prestigious preparatory schools in New England. His athletic and intellectual talents naturally make him the star of the institution in a few weeks. But to be accepted by his wealthy schoolmates, filled with anti-Semitic prejudice, and gain the love of a young girl from a good family, he is compelled to hide his Jewishness … until one day the truth explodes. At this moment, we understand that Christians are truly filthy people.

 

In the same genre, Marin Karmitz’s film, Blow for Blow (1971) is in the same genre: in a confectionary factory, the workers suffer intolerable and infernal working hours and conditions. A wildcat strike breaks out: the boss, kidnapped, humiliated and intimidated, is forced to capitulate. Like many of his fellow-Jews, Marin Karmitz made the transition from “Far-Left” to “Hard” “Liberal Right” early in the 21st century: the only problem now is how to “consolidate” the “multiracial society”.

 

The aggressiveness of cosmopolitan Jewish directors against the European world finds expression once again in The Servant (1963): a young English aristocrat, full of arrogance, hires a domestic servant in his service. The aristocrat quickly plunges into alcoholism and decadence, while the servant, highly dignified, comes to exercise an increasingly greater domination over his master. This tendency systematically to gravitate towards “inverted values” is very typical of the Hebraic mentality. The film is by Joseph Losey, based on a screenplay by Harold Pinter (Nobel Prize for Literature in 2005), who succeeded his fellow-Jew Elfriede Jelink.

 

The Middle Ages are always depicted in the darkest colours. We are told that the lords were always wicked and cruel: see The War Lord (USA, 1965). In the 11th century, the local lord notices a young peasant girl while out hunting. She is engaged to be married, and just as they are about to celebrate their nuptials, the lord enforces his jus primae noctis (an invention of French republicans in the 19th century). The film is by Franklin Schaffner.

 

The producer Rob Cohen manipulates the same story in his way in a “multicultural” sense in the film Medieval (USA, 2009): this is the story of a monk, a knight, a samurai, a Zulu, an Arab, a gypsy and a Viking — all in the Middle Ages!

 

The same contempt for traditional civilization may also be found in amusing cartoons, like Shrek (USA, 2001), once again. “Shrek” is a gentle, lovable ogre who lives in a remote forest. He confronts a dreadful dragon and rescues a beautiful princess. The king is a stubborn, ridiculous nabob (which is not in the European tradition at all) who wants to marry the princess, too, but Shrek, who has fallen in love with her, saves her from the coerced match in the cathedral in which the marriage is to be celebrated. The smashing of the stained glass window of the cathedral by the dragon, who forces his way inside, interrupting the forced nuptials, is supposed to be “symbolic”. Directed by Ted Elliott.

 

The Truman Show (USA, 1998) is a typical film: Truman is a man who is unaware that he only the unsuspecting star of a TV show. His surroundings are nothing but a set. All the people around him are actors, and he is the only one who doesn’t know it. The director’s intention was attack the papier maché society which serves as the stage set for Truman’s life: its hypocrisy, its false happiness. This hypocritical society is a WASP [White Anglo Saxon Protestant] society in which there are no drugs, no delinquency, no porn. In escaping from this world which is “closed, fragile, closed on itself”, Truman experiences the joys of indiscriminate sex, drugs and ethnic chaos. One could hardly expect any different from the director of the Dead Poets Society, Peter Weir.

 

Cosmopolitan” film makers do not just attack European culture alone. Wherever Jews settle, they set about to undermine, mock, ridicule and attack all local elites so as to replace them.

 

Here is a “Tamil” film: A Donkey in the Brahmin Ghetto (India, 1977). A donkey sneaks into a village enclave reserved for the superior caste of Brahmins and is adopted as a mascot. The donkey induces miraculous visions in the priests, and the animal quickly becomes an object of veneration. This sarcastic film is signed “John Abraham”, no doubt a pure-blooded “Tamil”.

 

Or take a look at Ankur [“The Seedling”] (India, 1974): in an Indian village, a peasant woman, servant to a property owner, is seduced by her patron. The patron commits a number of serious crimes against the peasants with impunity, but revolt is brewing … Shyam Benegal, the director, is, of course, a “Hindu”.

 

Judaism, we see, is a dissolving force in all nations in which it is introduced. The Jews like to “break down barriers”, “shatter taboos”, as they themselves very often say. Nahum Goldman, the founder of the World Jewish Congress, wrote very explicitly:

 

This is the way it is: Jews are revolutionaries for other peoples, but not for themselves”.

 

 

Anti-Christianity

 

Jewish worldwide cinema is also characterised by an anti-Christian messages. In television or at the cinema, Christians, and Catholics in particular, are most often depicted as bigots, narrow-minded and intolerant, even rapists and murderers. The Catholic clergy is regularly depicted as a haven for sadists and perverts of all stripes.

 

In Crimson Rivers (2003), a network of dangerous, terribly well organized, “neo-Nazis” has been detected. They set up their general headquarters in a monastery in Lorraine, linked by underground tunnels to the Maginot Line. The monks, who are fighting for a “White Christian Europe”, are in contact with highly placed European personages undermining the established order: they are everywhere, they own everything, but they are invisible. The film is signed Olivier Dahan.

 

Jean-Jacques Annaud’s beautiful film, The Name of the Rose (France, 1986), is taken from a novel by the world-famous Italian author Umberto Eco: the film is a crime drama set in a monastery in Northern Italy in the early 14th century. The film is littered with medieval clichés: all the monks, without exception, are abnormal. They grease their palms off the peasants who bring them their miserable harvests, while the peasants live in the filth and garbage tossed to them by the monks. The Catholic Church from top to bottom is just a perversion: the monks keep people in servitude and fear of the Devil, while jealously guarding the marvels contained in their Greek books which threaten to destabilise their power.

 

Of course, it all ends up in torture and the stake.

 

The film was produced with the collaboration of Jacques Le Goff, an historian of the Marxist school. If anyone cares to take a non-Marxist glimpse at the magnificent epoch which was the Middle Ages, one should read the short book by Regine Permond entitled Pour en Finir avec le Moyen Age (“Finishing Off the Middle Ages”), (1977).

 

Let us note that at no time during the entire film is there any question of a rose … The title is obviously intended for initiates in the Kabbala; in this regard, we note that the author of this tale, Umberto Eco, in 2005, also wrote the preface to a book entitled Messianic Mystics, in which he establishes a parallel between Hebraic messianism and Marxism.

 

Among Jewish American directors, anti-Christian hatred is expressed in the same manner. In Seven (1995), a Catholic sex pervert has undertaken to commit seven murders symbolizing his hatred of the seven capital sins: a film by David Fincher.

 

In The Shawshank Redemption (1994), the prison warden turns out to be the real villain; at the same time, of course, he is a very pious Christian. The film is signed Frank “Darabont.

 

In The Favour, the Watch and the Very Big Fish (1991), film maker Ben Lewin displays his disgust with Christianity.

 

In The Last Temptation of Christ, by Martin Scorsese (1998), Christ begins to dream of what his life could have been like with Mary Magdalene. We see Jesus make love to her. This film is an adaptation of a novel by Niko Kazantzakis.

 

In Agnes of God, by Norman Jewison (1985), The Verdict, by Sydney Lumet (1982), Papillon, by Franklin Schaffner (1973), Elmer Gantry, by Richard Brooks (1960), the Christian characters, priests and nuns, are regularly portrayed as villains.

 

Jewish film directors also appear to derive pleasure, in their films, from disrupting Catholic ceremonies. In the comedy In and Out (USA, 1997) for example, a marriage ceremony is taking place. At the very moment when they about to say “Yes” before the entire family and assembled congregation, the groom refuses, and announces in a low tone, with an air of resignation, that he is “gay”. Stupefaction! The ceremony breaks up in an uproar, and the couple quarrel violently in public. The film is directed by Frank Oz.

 

In Shrek (2001), the marriage ceremony is disrupted by a dragon who enters the church by smashing a stained glass window. In Sacred Union, by Alexander Arcady (France, 1989), a funeral is disrupted. In A Very Curious Girl, by Nelly Kaplan (1969), a Mass is disrupted.

 

The film Hair (USA, 1979) contains a sacrilegious scene set in a church: a group of long-haired hippies, high on acid, transform a marriage ceremony into a Black Mass, complete with ecstatic dances, as if they were all possessed by the Devil. In actual fact, however, these contortions resemble the ceremonies of Hassidic Jews more than anything else. The film director is the “CzechMilos Forman.

 

 

The Blacks Are Going to Save Humanity

 

Science fiction stories are always an excuse to glorify the unification of humanity and the intermingling of all races. In Independence Day (USA, 1996), by Roland Emmerich, the planet, attacked by extra-terrestrials, is saved by a Black and a Jew.

 

In The Fifth Element, a film by Luc Besson (1997), the President of the United States is Black.

 

In Deep Impact (USA, 1998), a gigantic asteroid is about to crash into the Earth. The planet is saved in extremis by the American President, who is Black.

 

In Bruce Almighty (USA, 2003), a Black plays the role of God. The film was directed by Tom Shadyac, based on a screenplay by Steve Koren. David Palmer, President of the United States in the TV series 24, is yet again played by a Black actor.

 

All this propaganda was no doubt intended to pave the way for the forthcoming election, by the American people, in November 2008, of the first Black President of the United States.

 

 

The Races Do Not Exist

 

Now it is much easier to understand why so many “scholars” assure us that “the races do not exist”. The world famous author Primo Levi became the eulogist of race-mixing (for the goyim only, of course). In order to cause the acceptance of the idea more easily, he started with the postulate that we are all racial mixed:

 

The Indo-European race is not pure, since nothing proves that it is”.

 

In February 2001, the Minister of Research, Roger-Gerard Schwartzenberg, stated:

 

The races do not exist”.

 

The September 2001 of the UNESCO Courier (publication of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), contains lengthy claims in this sense:

 

The human genome has been decoded at last. The endpoint of this project invalidates the myth of races. Genetic research has established that we all descend from one same common ancestor, born in Africa.

 

The famous geneticist, Axel Kahn, who was one of the organizers of the World Congress “against racial discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance”, held in September 2001 at Durban, South Africa, confirmed:

 

All men are in fact of a great genetic homogeneity, since their common ancestor is very young in terms of the evolution of life; he lived more than 200,000 years ago in Africa.

 

You gotta believe it!

 

 

Your Lying Eyes

 

In the film Matrix, by Larry Wachowski (USA, 1999), human beings are entirely controlled by a computer program which dominates all their thoughts and their entire lives. They think that they exist, but in fact they are nothing but the slaves of machines. There remains only one small nest of resistance: Zion! The film is cram-packed with cabbalistic messages: the hero, Neo, is “the Elect”, the mythical liberator of humanity announced by the prophets, who will save “Zion”, as revealed by “The Oracle”. Human beings are depicted in the colours of a multi-racial society, while the “Matrix”, which intends to rule the universe, is represented by white men: three agents, led by one Agent Smith, who are, of course, very wicked, in their suits and ties. Once again, it is the whites who must bear responsibility for the real tyrants, since the matrix “really exists”; it’s the “matrix” that made this film.

 

Men in Black (USA, 1997) is a film which teaches us to welcome foreigners — all foreigners — even extra-terrestrials. We don’t know it yet, but there are already large numbers of them living among us; they have taken human shape. Members of a special governmental agency are responsible for regulating the flow of this “new kind of immigrant”, and to keep the existence of these extra-terrestrials secret so as to avoid alarming the population. Two super special agents, one Black and one White, are assigned to track down a hostile alien. The film was adapted by Barry Sonnenfeld from a screenplay by Ed Solomon. It was also produced by Steven Spielberg. All these directors and script writers are “extra-terrestrials disguised as human beings” and “agents of the Matrix”.

 

John Carpenter is the director of They Live (USA, 1988); the hero, Nada, thanks to special eye glasses, discovers that a small proportion of the population are composed of extra-terrestrials who look just like human beings. These aliens form an elite which governs the world through lies and corruption. These special eyeglasses also permit him to read subliminal messages on advertising panels, which order submission of all humans. They are everywhere, they own everything, you just can’t see it!

 

In Raiders of the Lost Arc (USA, 1980), by Steven Spielberg, we understand that the power of Yahweh is far too tremendous for us even to dream of resisting it.

 

Paris, April 2012

 

______________________________

 

Source: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/ryssen1.htm

 

_______________________________

 

 

Footnotes:

 

[1] Books by Hervé Ryssen. http://herveryssen.over-blog.com/

 

 

[2] Herve Ryssen’s latest book is Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux [The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks]

 

 

Les Milliards d’Israël. Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux

 

Notre nouveau livre intitulé Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux (336 pages) sera disponible en librairie le 17 septembre 2014. Le livre pourra être acheté en prévente au mois d’août ou début septembre afin de payer l’imprimeur. Nous vous tiendrons au courant d’ici peu sur la démarche à suivre.

Pour les flics de la pensée et autres censeurs, sachez que le fichier est entre de bonnes mains, et que même s’il devait m’arriver un malheur, le livre serait publié de toute manière. Juifs, si vous avez peur des livres, c’est que vous avez sans doute des choses à vous reprocher !

A très bientôt, chers lecteurs, pour plus d’informations.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS : Je me demande si je ne vais pas dédier ce livre à Claire Lafoix, la présidente de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Nanterre, qui m’a condamné le 9 avril 2014 à un mois de prison FERME, pour le simple port d’une bombe lacrymogène.

Il est vrai qu’elle entre en compétition avec les guignols de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Paris, qui eux, m’ont condamné à deux mois de prison FERME pour une simple blague sur les moeurs de Bertrand Delanoë.

Auront-ils le courage de mettre un écrivain en prison ?

Sont-ils assez crétins pour aller jusque là ?

L’avenir nous le dira !

 

——————-

 

 

From Google Translate:

 

Our new book, The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks (336 pages) will be available in bookstores on September 17 2014. The book can be ordered in advance in the month of August or early September via the printer. We will keep you posted shortly on how to proceed.

For the cops and other critics, know that the file is in good hands, and that even if a disaster should happen to me, the book would be published anyway. Jews, if you are afraid of books it is because you probably have something to hide!

See you soon, dear readers, for more information.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS: I wonder if I’m not going to dedicate the book to Claire Lafoix, the 17th president of the criminal court of Nanterre, who sentenced me April 9, 2014 to one month FARM prison for simply wearing a tear bombs.

True, it competes with the horns of the 17th Criminal Chamber of Paris, who themselves have sentenced me to two months in prison for simple FARM joke about the morals of Bertrand Delanoë.

Will they have the courage to put a writer in prison?

Are they fools enough to go that far?

The future will tell!

 

 

—————————————————————-

 

Click to go to:   

Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 1

Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 2

 Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 3

 Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 4

 Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 5

 Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 6 (last)

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (0.9 MB).

 

>>Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 1 – Ver 2

 

 

Version History

 

 

Version 5: Dec 27, 2019 – Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version..

 

Version 4: Apr 28, 2018 – Improved formatting.

 

Version 3: May 29, 2015 – Formatting. Added Ver 2 of PDF

 

Version 2: Jan 19, 2015 – Expanded Table of Contents

 

Version 1: Published Oct 22, 2014

Posted in Arabs, Christainity, France, Germany, Hervé Ryssen, Holocaust, International Finance, Israel, Jews, Negros, New World Order, Race, Race Differences, White Nationalism | 4 Comments

Don’t Laugh! It’s “Anti-Semitic!

Don’t Laugh!

 

It’s “Anti-Semitic”!

 

International Zionism’s Crusade Against Dieudonné

and The Global Jewish Assault

On Freedom of Speech

 

4 February 2014

 

By Jonathan Azaziah at Mask of Zion

http://www.maskofzion.com/2014/02/dont-laugh-its-anti-semitic.html

 

Dieudonne 136

[Image] Dieudonné M’bala M’bala: The anti-Zionist comedic genius that Organized Jewish Interests love to hate.

 

Is it not astounding, nay, the very apogee of mind-boggling, that “democracy”, the globe’s dominant political model, in which “freedom of speech” is a central if not foundational tenet, is vehemently and vitriolically doing all that it can, wherever its outposts are throughout the world, to silence, nay, eradicate, one particular criticism and ipso facto anyone who has the nobleness to promulgate the aforesaid criticism?

 

Imperialism”? Fire away! “White supremacy”? Have at it! “Capitalism”? Sky is the limit! “Dictatorship”? Here’s an appearance on “Democracy Now”! Malevolent social injustices like police brutality, political corruption, patriarchy, gentrification, environmental abuses, etcetera? By all means, preach and don’t stop preaching! But the moment an individual takes a deep breath, performs a swift trip around the earth in his or her mind, and sees with his or her mind’s eye that there is a common insidiousness, a parent evil if you will, that permeates every ill and injustice from north to south and east to west, and he or she then calls it out by name and slams it with a thunderous condemnation, that is when the Rubicon is crossed.

 

Mention Zionism, “Israel”, Judaism and the supremacy inherent to the religion-culture under the doctrine of “chosen-ness”, Jewish power or Jewishness in any “activist” circle, let alone any mainstream avenue, and you will be hexed and cast out quicker than you can even blink. The “Z”, “I” and “J” words are tantamount to career suicide at best and a terribly real threat to one’s life at worst.

 

Indeed, it was the 18th century French philosopher Voltaire who famously said,

To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.

Not only have the words never rang as true as they do in this current point in history, it is not without irony that Voltaire himself was considered to be a staunch critic of the Organized Jewish community of his time.

 

And on that note, we find ourselves in the thick of the case of Dieudonné M’bala M’bala, better known as Dieudonné or simply Dieudo to those who support him, the controversial, brilliant, wildly popular French-Cameroonian comedian who over the last decade or so has taken France by storm with his anti-Zionist, anti-establishment, pro-Palestine, pro-Resistance sketches and routines, much to the ire of International Jewry. Fined, ridiculed and banned on numerous occasions throughout the years, Dieudonné has trucked on steadfastly. It is integral to understand what has befallen him, as his ongoing struggle against his detractors is a microcosm of the global Jewish-Zionist assault on genuine, unmitigated freedom of speech.

 

Dieudonne 137

[Image] Nicolas Anelka performing the quenelle in solidarity with Dieudonné, and upsetting a whole lot of Zionists in the process.

 

 

Nicolas Anelka and The Quenelle: Jewish Hysteria Reaches A Fever Pitch

 

On December 28th, 2013, the legendary international football star and current West Bromwich Albion striker Nicolas Anelka, who won the World Cup with France in 2006 and has played with top clubs across Europe for almost two decades, set off a chain of events that he could not have possibly imagined would ever come to fruition. After scoring his first of two goals during that Saturday match, Anelka performed the “quenelle”, an anti-establishment gesture popularized by Dieudonné which essentially means “up yours”. Alarm bells began ringing across Jewish-Zionist power centers across the globe and before the grueling match which ended in a 3-3 draw was even in the books, Anelka was being deemed an “anti-Semite” in the international press. West Bromwich Albion coach Keith Downing blasted the accusations as “absolute rubbish” (1).

 

Utter ridiculousness aside, an investigation was immediately initiated by the FA (Football Association), and after a little more than 3 weeks, Anelka was charged with,

 “making a gesture that was abusive and/or indecent and/or insulting and/or improper”, as well as “an aggravated breach in that it included a reference to ethnic origin and/or race and/or religion or belief”.

 

He was punished with a 5-match ban (2). Additionally, Zoopla, a British property website owned by Jewish businessman Alex Chesterman and a main sponsor of West Bromwich Albion, cut its sponsorship of the club because it wouldn’t drop Anelka (3). Chesterman’s pressure is only the tip of the iceberg however, as the entire campaign against Nicolas Anelka was driven by the organized Jewish community, notably the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Community Security Trust (4), a dangerous organization with connections to the international Zionist terrorist organization known as the Mossad (5).

 

Dieudonne 138

[Image] David Bernstein: the Jewish supremacist high roller that is “zionizing” British football.

 

It is by no means coincidental but rather part and parcel of the horror that has been inflicted upon Nicolas Anelka that the chairman of the FA is David Bernstein, a devout Jew who has repugnantly used his position to spread “Holocaust” propaganda wrapped in the garb of football to the UK’s youth (6), and an ardent Zionist who gleefully turned the “Football For All” platform into a whitewashing festival of the usurping “Israeli” regime’s genocidal existence (7). Equally critical to note is the fact that while are very few Jewish players in British football, Jews run the vast majority of the Premier League. Among these owners is Roman Abramovich (8), an obscenely wealthy Zionist gangster involved in “Israeli” blood diamond dealing and the ethnic cleansing of occupied Al-Quds (9). Point being? Nicolas Anelka adamantly denying that he is racist or “anti-Semitic” (10) is ultimately irrelevant due to the undeniable truth that the Jewish persons controlling British football have a Zionist agenda that is global in scope.

 

To add further insult to injury, Nicolas Anelka endured another dose of heavy embarrassment after Roger Cukierman, the president of CRIF (Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France), initially stated that Anelka’s performing of the quenelle in that particular context was not “anti-Semitic” but then backtracked once it was clear that the football star would be charged, going as far to say that the usage of the quenelle was being “dangerously spread among our citizens and especially youth.” Zionist fanatic Cukierman continued on in a rabid tirade against Dieudonné (11), proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that “free speech”, “democratic ideals” and the truth above all else are of no concern to Jewish supremacists when their agenda is hanging on by a thread; all of those attributes aren’t merely denied but trampled upon with malice.

 

 

Onslaught On Dieudonné: World Zionism Mobilizes To Muzzle Him

 

Dieudonne 140

[Image] Dieudonné’s quenelle: feared by Zionists everywhere; embraced by the oppressed everywhere else.

 

Verily, Nicolas Anelka and his career are just collateral damage in this ongoing debacle. As the author of a recent venomous, hysterical editorial in the staunchly Zionist Jewish Daily Forward opined, “it is Dieudonné who is the true villain in this saga.” The piece, titled “Zoopla’ Joins Gibberish Feud Over ‘Quenelle”, goes on to take jabs at Anelka, label the quenelle as “neo-fascist” and viciously attack Dieudo for the “crime” of bringing Jewish-Zionist power to light and not making any bones about it in the process (12). And this is only the tip of the anti-Dieudonné iceberg. In the wake of the madness sparked by Anelka’s quenelle, an avalanche of hasbara was generated by Organized Jewry against the comedic phenom.

 

To name a minute few: The “Israeli” daily Ynet insanely labeled Dieudo a “modern day brown shirt” and lambasted the quenelle as a symbol of “modern day violent anti-Semitism” (13); the Jewish Daily Forward, in one of many attacks, notes that “the real danger is that Dieudonné is also pulling down the government’s shorts (14).” It isn’t the French regime that the Forward is worried about though, but the “Israeli”-blue-and-white-drenched hands behind it; Haaretz assailed Dieudonné for having “malignant influence (15)”; the Algemeiner gleefully carried the statements of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) which repeatedly condemned Dieudo (16), and along with the European Jewish Congress (EJC) and the umbrella group of Belgian Jewish organizations, CCOJB, played a key role in pressuring the French regime into cracking down on the French-Cameroonian star (17).Tablet Magazine, a most obnoxious Zionist rag owned by a brat of the immensely wealthy and powerful Newhouse family, published several hit pieces but one in particular glaringly stood out as it admitted that the quenelle is “hard to explain and harder to resist (18)”, thus exposing the intellectual bankruptcy of International Jewry and its agents.

 

Leading the campaign against Dieudonné have been the aforementioned CRIF, France’s AIPAC, and LICRA (The International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism), the French version of the ADL. LICRA, which has been agitating against him for over a decade now since he first criticized Zionism, has special privileges under French law, and, in blatantly similar fashion to a powerful mafia, has been using one nonsensical pretext after another to justify lawsuits that would lead to his blacklisting (19).

 

The CRIF-LICRA campaign paid dividends as the mayors of Marseille, Tours, and Bordeaux banned Dieudonné from performing in their cities on January 7th, 2014 (20).

 

Dieudonne 141

[Image] Roger Cukierman: Head of the CRIF (the French AIPAC), and leading Zionist operator against Dieudonné.

 

Two days later on January 9th, 2014, a French court threw out the bans, much to the delight of Dieudonné and his fans. Unfortunately, victory was declared too soon however as CRIF revved up the pressure (21), and with Zionist lapdogs President Hollande and Interior Minister Valls leading the charge, the overturn of the bans was unprecedentedly flipped at the last minute by Conseil d’Etat, France’s highest court, just before a Dieudonné show in Nantes (22), hence removing him from as many public forums as possible under the banner of “anti-racism”, arguably the most legendary and deceptive mask of Zion in existence today.

 

Worse still, one of the hit pieces that targeted the anti-Zionist comic, penned by an IOF commander and fanatical settler for Zionist colony mouthpiece Arutz Sheva, blatantly attempted to link Dieudonné and his quenelle to the March 2012 attack on a Jewish school in Toulouse (23), which, ironically or maybe even deliberately enough, bore all the likenesses of a false flag attack (24).

 

It is of no coincidence that following this disgraceful accusation, along with the continuing siege led by the Jewish-Zionist Lobby in France, Dieudo was targeted by les Huissiers de Justice, the collection arm of the French Justice Ministry, which showed up at his door demanding that he pay some 100,000 euros that he allegedly owed for several thought crime convictions he had amassed through the years. A verbal altercation ensued between Dieudo and the bailiffs, and then shots were fired. Dieudo was called in for questioning the following day and a warrant was subsequently issued to comb his home. A “projectile device”, whatever that is, was discovered in the search. Extraordinarily dubious does not do justice to the description of this event, and this is confirmed by the bailiffs themselves who don’t know who fired at them (25).

 

Taking the supreme questionableness of this happening into consideration, and then coupling it with the genocidal Zionist entity being responsible for the horrors of 9/11 (26), the calamity of 7/7 (27) and the catastrophe of 26/11 (28), as well as the fact that there are numerous occurrences of Jews faking “anti-Semitic” crimes (29), it is not beyond the limits of Organized Jewry and its acolytes by any means to stage such an event to put the proverbial nail in Dieudo’s coffin.

 

Dieudonne 142

[Image] When Dieudonné is on stage, International Jewry begins to shake in its very bones.

 

Nevertheless, Dieudonné, a dedicated anti-Zionist and a man of faith who identifies himself as an “Islamic Christian”, has stood his ground and refused to go quietly into the night as his “chosenite” tormenters bombard him from every angle. He has decided to do what he has done since awakening to the evils of Zionism so many years ago (30): fight back. His supporters, in an operation they wittily titled “Triple Quenelle”, hacked three French pro-“Israel” websites, including the French Jewish Defense League, and replaced the hateful Zionist content with Dieudonné support messages (31); Dieudo himself confronted the allegations against Nicolas Anelka, rejecting the accusations of “racism” and “anti-Semitism” and calling the football legend his “brother in humanity”, “noble”, “hope” and “a prince (32)”; and in the best response of all, Dieudo returned to the stage in defiance of the Zionist-run French establishment, smashing a howling crowd of more than 5,000 in Bordeaux (33).

 

What makes this latest show so uniquely significant is that the crowd was not comprised of the usual downtrodden Black and Brown (especially Muslim) youth which have been Dieudo’s most loyal fans through the years, but White and working class (33). This terrifies the French establishment and its Zionist overlords. In their minds, the thought that not only the peoples of the lands they once colonized but their own European citizenry could become part of the masses supporting Dieudo is a dangerous development indeed. Not to be outflanked, Paris responded by intensifying its measures against the humorist, launching raids on his home, production company and other premises (34). Resistant still, Dieudonné fired back yet again by declaring that he will go to the UK to prove he is anything but “racist”, as well as to display his solidarity with Nicolas Anelka, but these plans aren’t happening either, as the UK regime has banned him from entering after declaring him “persona non grata (35).” Considering the Jewish origins of Prime Minister David Cameron himself, as well as the powerful Jewish-Zionist moneymen who secured his rise to power (35a), it isn’t even the tiniest bit surprising that this Orwellian action was taken.

 

Embedded in the marrow of the matter is that the Zionists are not up in arms over an academic. They are not gnashing their teeth over a politician. They aren’t throwing the geopolitical equivalent of a temper tantrum over a judge, an attorney general or a businessperson with substantial wealth and influence. They’re going ballistic over a comedian. A funnyman. The sort of personality that is supposed to have at least a wee bit of leeway when criticizing the rich and powerful in an open, democratic society, for the sole, simple reason that it is just comedy.

 

The Zionists don’t share this view though. They are hysterical because any criticism of their might and societal sway, be it Dieudonné’s laugh-creation or any other individual in any other venue, has the potential to obliterate their illusory fortress. Why? Because the society ruled by Zionism is not open or democratic but totalitarian and despotic in pluralistic garb; if you tear off the garb, then you tear down the system. When their monstrously deranged farces, from the Zionist regime itself to the “Holocaust”, get exposed for the fraudulent, sickening manifestations of Jewish arrogance that they are, which is exactly what Dieudonné has done and is doing, it is only a small amount of time and this time alone that stands between them and their overthrow.

 

 

Haters Will Be Haters When Facts Are “Anti-Semitic”: Why Dieudonné’s Ideology Frightens His Detractors And How The Accusations Against Him Hold No Weight

 

Dieudonne 143

[Image] Men of honor, men of dignity: Dieudonné with living legend Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, former President of the Islamic Republic of Iran and champion of all things truthful.

 

Analyzing the seemingly never-ending controversy instigated against Dieudonné and his quenelle would be incomplete without a proper explanation of the ideology that drives the man firstly, and the past accusations against him secondly. Understanding both will prove, monosemously, that what is happening to Dieudo is politically motivated by Jewish-Zionist interests through and through, and not some sort of duty that the French regime is abiding by to “fight hatred”, “stop incitement” or “subdue racism”.

 

Just watching Dieudo’s most recent interview with Sky News confirms that his ideological weltanschauung extends much farther than the ill-defined, watered-down realm of “anti-racism” and positions itself firmly on the pedestal of liberationism (32). From his comedy routines and films to his politics and the quenelle, Dieudonné believes that shaking off the shackles of slavery and remaining steadfastly defiant to keep them off and eventually overthrow the system run by the slave-owners’ descendants is the only way to fight. Spiritually speaking, he mirrors the thoughts of Hizbullah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and the Islamic Republic of Iran, and he, along with his friend and ally Alain Soral, a French anti-Zionist author and philosopher who has also been targeted by France’s Jewish Lobby, have ties to the Iranian-supported Centre Zahra (36).

 

Dieudo traveled to Lebanon in August 2006 to meet with officials and fighters from Hizbullah in solidarity with the Mouqawamah’s legendary, transformational triumph over the usurping Zionist entity in the 34-Day War (37). He’s also been to Iran on several occasions, including a November 2009 trip where he met with and was warmly greeted by the honorable former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (38). He also worked side by side with Iran’s Haft Aseman Cinematic Company (HACC), Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance and Experimental and Documentary Film Center (EDFC) to produce several films (39). These meetings and projects only compounded Dieudo’s strong anti-Zionism and deepened his commitment to disseminating historical and political truths.

 

Dieudonne 144

[Image] Dieudonné with comrade Alain Soral in Lebanon just after the demonic Zionist aggression in the summer of 2006.

 

Based on this summary in isolation, it should be elucidative for all to see why Organized Jewish Interests fear the spread of Dieudo’s comedy to the Black, Brown and White youth of France: he is a proponent of the Iran-Hizbullah model for ideological liberation, and there is no greater obstacle to the Zionists’ quest for total control of the planet than the Resistance Axis, of which Iran and Hizbullah comprise 2/3. The very second that the Shah was toppled in 1979 by the Islamic Revolution led by Ayatollah Sayyed Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran became a target for International Zionism and its allies in the United States and the Gulf. To stop the Islamic Revolution from spreading, the Iran-Iraq War was initiated by Saddam Hussein on behalf of “Israel”, America, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, and since then, the onslaught on the Islamic Republic hasn’t stopped due to it being a beacon of hope, independence, sovereignty and resistance to the Empire and the hidden hands that pull the Empire’s strings (40).

 

Apart from Iran, nothing upsets International Zionism quite like Hizbullah. It is the only political movement on the face of the earth that is truly deserving of unequivocal backing, and one of the reasons why, if not the primary one, is because of its unwavering commitment to the Palestinian people and their sacred cause, which, for the record, is the dearest to the heart of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (41). The Mouqawamah was the only party of the Zionist-engineered Lebanese Civil War that defended the Palestinians. During the War of the Camps in particular, its moujahideen were martyred smuggling food to those under siege. In terms of Lebanese politics, it is the only organization that campaigns for Palestinian rights (42). All of Hizbullah’s actions have been in defense of Palestine, most especially its intervention in Syria (43).

 

Dieudonne 145

[Image] The Lebanese Islamic Resistance of Hizbullah is what keeps the leaders of the usurping Jewish supremacist entity awake at night.

 

Moreover, the Mouqawamah’s military capabilities and achievements continue to pile up by the day. Hizbullah’s strategic silence during the lead-up to what seemed like an imminent direct attack on Syria by NATO befuddled the intelligence services of both the West and the Zionist entity (44) and contributed to derailing the Empire’s war effort. The illegitimate “Israeli” regime has admitted that Hizbullah has power to bring the ports of occupied Haifa and Isdud, fraudulently called “Ashdod” by the Jewish occupiers, to an outright halt (45). Generals of the “Israeli” terrorist occupation army (IOF) have also revealed that Hizbullah’s rocketry is the 8th mightiest in the world (46), as well as the bitter truth that they cannot defeat the Resistance (47).

 

Most humiliating of all for the genocidal Jewish entity is what is now known as the “Labbouna Raid”, in which “Israeli” commandos attempted to carry out a reconnaissance operation in the Labbouna and Jall al-Alam areas of the South Lebanese village of Alma al-Shaab, only to be met by two expertly planted explosive devices which left them shocked, wounded and forced to retreat. The preemptive deterrence attack by the men of the Resistance showed the usurping Zionist enemy that even though they’re busy with its proxies on the Syrian front, their eyes are never, ever turned away from the primary aggressor (48). The foiling of the Zionists’ incursion affirmed that Hizbullah can handle, nay, triumphantly thrive on multiple fronts at once, no matter what is thrown its way. Dieudo, obviously, albeit from a different perspective, can relate.

 

Taking all of this in, it’s worth rehashing that the prospect of a talented, intellectually sound entertainer with familial ties to France’s indigenous and immigrant communities espousing the principles of victorious Hizbullah and indefatigable Iran alongside his own fiery as well as factual interpretation of Black liberationism is, for the Zionists, a recipe for total meltdown. Hence the repeated attempts by the French chapter of International Jewry to silence Dieudo with its favorite tool, its political meat-cleaver: “anti-Semitism”. Bottom line is though, none of the accusations put forth, in the legal arena or otherwise, hold any weight whatsoever. None.

 

On the 14th of June in 2006, Dieudo was charged with “defamation” and fined 4,500 Euros after stating that Arthur (real name: Jacques Essebag), a prominent French-Moroccan-Jewish television personality, “financed the ‘Israeli’ army which does not hesitate to murder Palestinian children (49)”. There is nothing even remotely inaccurate about Dieudo’s statement. Arthur is indeed a Zionist with family living in the usurping entity and had plans to tour there before the July War broke out (50). Thus, without exercising an exhausting amount of brain power, by the very definition of traveling to the occupying Jewish regime, to see family members who are land thieves, you are justifying its criminal existence with your money and supporting whatever it does.

 

Dieudonne 146

[Image] Remember this photo of Hala Abu Sabikha next time someone says that the Zionist regime’s terrorist army doesn’t murder children.

 

If that wasn’t enough to damn Arthur for the pro-“Israel” scoundrel that he is, let it also be shown for the record that he is in business with the godfathers of the illegal Jewish regime, the Rothschild family, in some sort of a laughable “ethical” coffee venture (51). As for the IOF murdering Palestinian children, well, it does, along with other Arab children too. One only needs to look at Operation Pillar of Cloud, Operation Cast Lead or the July War for the blatancy of IOF’s mass kid killing. If something more recent is needed, look no further than the psychotic, ritualistic murder of 3-year old Palestinian Hala Abu Sabikha, who was just standing outside her home with her two brothers when “Israeli” warplanes bombed illegally besieged Gaza in late December 2013 (52).

 

The 15th of November in 2007 saw Dieudo getting slapped with a fine of 5,000 Euros for calling Jews “slave traders”. Harsh? Possibly. Crude? Maybe. Direct? Without a doubt. But inaccurate? Not even close. The Nation of Islam’s Historical Research Department obliterated the myth of a nonexistent Jewish role in the Transatlantic Slave Trade and pulled back the curtains on one of history’s most forgotten chapters with its three must-read volumes, all derived solely from Jewish sources:

The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Volume 1” (53), “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Volume 2: How Jews Gained Control Of The Black American Economy” (54) and “Jews Selling Blacks: Slave Sale Advertising by American Jews” (55).

 

Dieudonne 147

[Image] Dieudonné with a copy of “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Vol. 2: How Jews Gained Control Of The Black American Economy”; there is no Jewish myth that this brother isn’t willing to confront.

 

These books proved, unquestionably, that Jews did not have a role of prominence but a role of dominance; of preeminence; they were the movers and the shakers of the Transatlantic Slave Trade, the makers and the takers, the wheelers and the dealers. To deny it would be equivalent to denying the blue hue of the sky on a day when clouds aren’t present. Additionally, a recent Jewish Telegraph Agency piece confirmed that large swathes of Dutch Jewry were actively involved in slave trading (56), and a Jewish Daily Forward story from July 2013 confirmed that.

 

 “Most southern Jews defended slavery, and some went further, advocating its expansion (57).

 

June 26th, 2008 brought the next ludicrous fine on top of Dieudonné’s head, this time in the amount of 7,000 Euros for dubbing slamming the “Holocaust” as “memorial pornography”. Now, besides from the philosophical weight the remark carries, in which it implies that Jewish suffering has been granted primacy over all other sufferings and it is habitually used by Organized Jewish Interests in a pornographic manner to subvert, usurp, exploit, influence and corrupt in the name of “preserving the Jewish people” or “protecting ‘Israel’s’ right to exist”, there is, again, that pesky matter of evidence. Is there evidence to back Dieudonné up? The answer is an emphatic “yes”.

 

For two years straight, the demented, depraved “Israelis” have held a “Miss Holocaust Survivor” pageant (58), parading alleged “survivors” of World War II persecution around on a stage in a celebration of “Holocaust” myths and Zionism in general. Even more excruciatingly perverse are the Stalags, pornographic pocket books based made up of “Nazism”, sex and violence created by Zionist Jews who pretended to have translated the books from English to Hebrew to hide the fact that this sexual deviancy was “distinctly Israeli”. Once thought to be one of the societal secrets of the usurping Jewish entity, the Stalags are making a comeback (59). If that doesn’t define “memorial pornography” to the letter, I truly do not know what will.

 

February 27th, 2009 saw Dieudonné slammed with a whopping $75,000 fine after he blasted popular French-Algerian-Jewish singer and actor Patrick Bruel, stating that he was “practically an Israeli soldier. So when they bomb southern Lebanon and they kill Palestinian children, for him, it’s normal.” Dieudo also called him out for being “a product of this ultra-Zionist political system, he’s a super-militant… He has the superiority complex of certain Israelis (60).” There is a broken record to be heard here. Bruel is indeed an ultra-Zionist, and as is the case with all other ultra-Zionists, he cares not one bit for the Arab children murdered by his beloved criminal Jewish entity. Bruel has a longstanding musical relationship with the illegal occupation regime, performing there on many, many occasions, including as recently as last year (61), and has recorded music with “Israeli” occupation “artists” going back to 1996 (62).

 

Solidifying Bruel’s ultra-Zionist credentials are his performance at the noxious, malevolent “Tel Aviv” University (63), a horrific institution that has played an abyssal role in Zionist expansionism since the Nakba and is built on top of the ethnically cleansed village of Sheikh Muwannis (64), as well as his role in the cringe-worthy hasbara flick “O Jerusalem”, which whitewashes the Jewish terrorism of the Nakba and replaces it with the age-old Zionist narrative of “independence and victimhood” (65). Bruel and his tribalist cohorts can wax lyrical about “anti-Semitism” as much as they want. Facts are facts and all Dieudo did was lay them on the line for all to see.

 

Dieudonne 148

[Image] Dieudonné and Dr. Robert Faurisson (Holocaust revisionist): truth-telling birds of a feather flock together.

 

Rounding out the farcical actions against Dieudonné are the October 27th, 2009 case, in which he was hit with a fine of 10,000 Euros for “public insult of people of Jewish faith or origin” after doing a show which featured courageous “Holocaust” revisionist and truth teller Dr. Robert Faurisson, and the June 8th 2010, case in which the 47-year old activist-satirist was sentenced to another fine of 10,000 Euros for defamation after he criticized LICRA as a “mafia-like association that organizes censorship”. The Faurisson case is notably nitwitted as it does not vindicate International Jewry’s crusade against Dieudo and his remarks about Jewish-Zionist power but rather vociferously invalidates it, into oblivion even.

 

Faurisson’s views on World War II and even Zionism aside, Dieudo was charged, basically, for being in the company of someone not liked by Jews; someone that Jews find offensive because that person has an educated opinion different from theirs about a certain historical event. That’s all. There is nothing remotely “democratic” about this outrage. Flip the script now and imagine, just imagine, if Jewish-Zionist leaders and entertainers were charged for “public insult of people of Muslim faith or Arab origin” because they went palling around France with officials from the usurping Zionist regime? At least these charges would be rooted in validity as Arabs and Muslims indeed feel insulted by the existence of “Israel” and the genocide it has committed against the Ummah for more than six decades! Nonetheless, the undoubted response that would be unleashed by International Jewry over such a scenario is too astronomical to even theorize on what it may be.

 

The fatuity of the LICRA case is self-evident. It is really not in the realm, nay, the universe, nay, the very dimension of deniability that LICRA is not a “mafia-like association that organizes censorship”. If anything, Dieudo should be awarded for finding new synonyms for “mafia” and “censorship”, both of which are interchangeable with LICRA. It hasn’t just been Dieudonné who has had a target painted on his back by LICRA. The notorious Zionist pressure group also led a “free speech” assault on a dozen Palestine solidarity activists (66), and will certainly continue on its silencing spree in the name of “chosenite” interests whenever its latest violation of Dieudo’s most basic rights has ceased.

 

Dieudonne 149

[Image] Considering the brazen (and true) nature of the language on this cover, how demented is it that Dieudonné can be called “anti-Semitic” for simply pointing out the obvious?

 

Perhaps even more debunkable than the accusations that led to legal proceedings against Dieudonné are those that didn’t. While one could fill up the pages of a book series in compiling such remarks from rabid Zionist Jews and their lobby organizations, there are two, just two specifically that are most relevant to this study and most worthy of analytical dismemberment. An Arutz Sheva report from December 2009 sought to yet again conflate Dieudonné with “Nazism” because he established a working relationship with Iran and threw shots at Hollywood for being the “long arm of Zionist culture (67)”. But when it is known that Hollywood is controlled by Jewish supremacists, that Hollywood is inextricably linked with the genocidal Zionist regime, that Hollywood spreads ungodly, racist propaganda against Arabs and Muslims, that Hollywood uses celebrities as hasbara mouthpieces and that Hollywood is integral to the Zionist balkanization stratagem in the Middle East, Syria and Sudan in particular (68), how can his comment be taken for anything other than truth?

 

More prevalent than his Hollywood observation is Dieudo’s remark in a pro-Dieudonné film entitled “Is it allowed to discuss with Dieudonne?”, made by a journalist and a fan of his. The film earned him heavy condemnation from the Union of Jewish Students in Belgium (UEJB) and the European Union of Jewish Students (EUJS), mainly due to him declaring that “the biggest swindlers of the planet are the Jews (69).” As coarse as the anti-Zionist humorist’s comment may have been, pleasantry isn’t the issue at here; truth is. And truthful is precisely the word needed to sum up Dieudo’s proclamation.

 

Have the UEJB and EUJS not heard of the Rothschild family? Are the UEJB and EUJS not in the know about this fiercely demonic gang of Talmudic, Zionist bankers who funded British and French colonialism and imperialism, easily the greatest “swindles” of the modern era, which ravaged the African continent especially (70)? Have these Zionists not heard of Bernie Madoff, whose historic, infamous financial $50 billion “swindle” was deeply connected to “Israeli” intrigue on 9/11 (71)? Have these concerned Jewish students not heard of Scott Rothstein, the South Floridian Jewish lawyer who orchestrated a $1.2 billion ponzi “swindle” and sailed off into the sunset of flamboyance and mass political influence (72)? What about Irving Rosenfeld and Jordan Belfort? Are the UEJB and EUJS not aware of these tremendously immoral Jewish con men whose “swindling” lives are now blazing across the silver screen in Oscar-nominated glorifications of their exploits (73)?

 

Dieudonne 150

[Image] NY slumlord Menachem Stark: one of many, and many is indeed the word, Jewish “swindlers” across the globe.

 

Does the name Joseph Greenblatt ring any bells for the UEJP and EUJS? This Orthodox Jew ran a ponzi scheme worth tens of millions of dollars that “swindled” his own community before being caught and sentenced to fair amount of prison time (74). If they haven’t heard of Greenblatt, they must not have heard of Shervin Neman, a Persian Jew in Los Angeles who followed in Greenblatt’s footsteps by “swindling” members of his own “tribe” out of millions (75). Menachem Stark is another “swindler” of interest that the Zionist college-goers should be cognizant of. This Hasidic real estate developer was known to New York law enforcement as a “scammer” and a man who “f***ed over a few people”, and more than likely would have kept doing so if he didn’t wind up dead in a trash bin (76). And while we’re still in New York, let us not fail to mention the Jewish orchestration of a multimillion dollar “swindle” at the Metropolitan Council on Jewish Poverty (77).

 

And the “swindle” doesn’t even come close to ending there. It has been uncovered, in a matter most humiliating to International Zionism, its arms the UEJP and the EUJS and like-minded Jews worldwide, that Gilad and Omri Sharon, the sons of now dead war criminal Ariel “Butcher of Beirut” Sharon, kept their Zionist maniac of a father on life support after he fell into a coma because they wanted to pocket his three pensions for a handful of “swindler’s” endeavors (78). Arguably the most profane and geopolitically reverberating Jewish “swindle” of the last decade was that of the bankrupting of Iceland, something little-known to many astute analysts. Dorrit Moussaieff, the First Lady of Iceland, the Tchenguiz brothers, Simon Halabi, Moises and Mendi Gertner, all “Israeli” Jews (79), along with Major General Danny Rothschild, a former head of Israeli military intelligence (80), brought down Iceland’s economy in a mega-scam as a means of showing the world that all independent nations, no matter how stable, can crumble if International Jewry sticks its destabilizing hands into their coffers.

 

Aside from the economic decapitation of Iceland, and, of course, the ongoing Rothschild-financing of imperialism, there is no Jewish “swindle” that has affected the world more negatively, devastatingly really, than the existence of the cancerous thing known as “Israel”. Built on the myths of “making the desert bloom” and “a land without a people for a people without a land”, fortified under the mask of “independence” through the ethnic cleansing of upwards of 800,000 aboriginal Palestinians in the Nakba, and upheld by a powerful influential network spanning the globe and supported by the vast majority of World Jewry (81), the usurping Zionist entity represents the very essence of what a “swindle” is.

 

Dieudonne 151

[Image] International Jewry is the name… And “swindle” is the game.

 

Whether Dieudo’s detractors like it or not, Jews are indeed the world’s greatest swindlers, and even non-Jewish hyper-swindlers like Allen Stanford are intimately linked with the upper echelons of the Zionist Power Configuration (82), confirming that for one to “get in where he fits in”, to establish himself in the world of high finance, one must recognize and commit himself to serving the kingmakers, who, in this case, are Organized Jewish Interests. Truth be told, “swindling” is as Jewish as the Talmud itself. As evidenced by the aforementioned Jewish-made films about “chosenite” con men Rosenfeld and Belfort, or the phrase “memorial pornography”, which originated with “Israeli” historian Idith Zertal (83), Dieudo was fined, essentially, for saying what Jews have said and written themselves, simply reinforcing the fact that there is in place a global system of apartheid, or more aptly, “hafrada”, the Hebrew word for separation, which divides Jews from non-Jews.

 

It is not what Dieudonné said, or how he said it, but that he dared to even open his mouth in a challenging manner to begin with. The Zionist Power Configuration has no problem whatsoever with Gentiles, or “goyim” in Jewish eyes, speaking of Jewish wealth, power, influence and “achievement” in a positive light, offering up praises as if Zionism represented a “god” of sorts, but the moment a “goy” raises his voice in loud objection to the globe-spanning string-pulling of International Jewry, he will become a pariah faster than he can repeat the hideous myth of “6 million Jews died in the Holocaust and they are holier than the holiest of holies”.

 

Regarding Jews themselves, it is no issue for them to speak about their prowess as economic controllers, media barons and political subverters, as long as it follows a golden rule of being done “out of the earshot of the goyim” as Jewish-Zionist author JJ Goldberg so delightfully and bigotedly described it (84). Dieudonné defiantly broke this golden rule, and it is for this reason why International Zionism decided to drop the ax on his head. Not because its accusations against him hold any weight, but because his words do.

 

 

Conclusion: Football Jerseys, Holocaustianity and The Incoming Battle Between Silence and Defiance

 

Central to the war on Dieudonné is the always explosive topic of the “Holocaust”. In an interview with Iran’s Press TV in April 2010, Dieudo fired away,

In France, for example, we commemorate only one of the events that have caused suffering for people – the Holocaust. Other events where mankind has suffered injustice are completely overlooked. For example, slavery in French colonies, the Algerian war, and many other events are never mentioned. The Zionist lobby imposes an unequal competition, a hierarchy in the sufferings of different communities, which is completely obscene (85).

With that noted, another bang-on Dieudo barb comes to mind, this time in an interview quoted by the Zionist-owned New York Times in June 2012, “Our submission to the Shoah has come to such degree that it became a new religion (86).

 

Dieudonne 157

[Image] Pushed by Organized Jewish Interests down the throat of the world, “Jewish suffering” is meant to have primacy over and above all other sufferings on earth.

 

Taking it in an even more abyssal direction on this very point, while simultaneously noting the colossal hypocrisy of Organized Jewish Interests, the French-Cameroonian master of mockery and savant of sarcasm hit the game-winner at the buzzer in a 2013 interview with the Nation of Islam,

The Jewish Holocaust is like a trophy. In France one can caricature Prophet Muhammad, one can say the Pope of Rome is a pedophile, one can even say slavery did not exist. But you cannot contest the reality of the Jewish Holocaust. The Holocaust is a new god (87).

 

The name of this new religion that brother Dieudonné speaks of is Holocaustianity and the “god” of it is the mythical, almost sentient collective that can simply be referred to as “The 6 Million”. Challenging Holocaustianity is blasphemy; demanding proof of “The 6 Million” or innocently questioning why the number can certainly be increased if need be, as a means of praising “The 6 Million”, but never lowered, is punishable by death, both literally and figuratively in the form of character assassination. The priest class of Holocaustianity is International Jewry, and it indeed takes a “tithe” from the world in the form of “reparations” for the “The 6 Million”, extracted chiefly from European regimes that are brutally beaten over the head again and again with the most dangerous as well as effective weapon of guilt; manufactured guilt at that, for an event that did not even occur in the manner in which we are told it occurred. The “church” from which the “gospel” of Holocaustianity is “preached” is none other than the airwaves of the media controlled by the priest class, and the congregation to whom it preaches to is none other than the “goyim”, who sop up every bit of it in an unknowing ode to their masters.

 

As is the case with every religion, there are heretics and apostates. And quite frankly, to be heretical in the era of Holocaustianity is the most revolutionary, defiant, courageous, honorable, dignified and downright gutsy thing one can pride himself or herself on being. Furthermore, due to “The 6 Million” being invoked by Jewish neocons as the primary motivational factor that drove them to organize and implement imperial wars of aggression for Organized Jewish Interests (88), it is not only preferable or recommendable but obligatory to strip off your shackles of Zion and become a Holocaustianity Heretic. Humanity’s future depends on the categorical rejection of Holocaustianity’s self-proclaimed uniqueness and the overthrow of Holocaustianity’s “chosenite” priest class.

 

Dieudonne 152

[Image] The French people have had it with Zionist puppet Hollande and the entire Jewish plutocratic system. They want real change and all it is going to take is a single spark to set them off. Dieudonné just may be it.

 

Geopolitical designs are resting at the center of the ongoing clash between Dieudonné and the Zionist powers that be. Holocaustianity is used in France to justify its increasing pro-“Israel” policy in the Arab and Islamic world, a policy which Dieudonné openly defies, especially regarding Libya. The “Israeli” regime itself, through its Jewish Agency, one of its many ethnic cleansing arms, is also employing Holocaustianity, and Dieudonné’s challenging of it, to push Jews into leaving France for occupied Palestine and starting a new life as illegal colonists (89). The Gayssot Law, one of Europe’s several thought crime laws, is in place to silence Holocaustianity Heretics and uphold International Zionism’s stranglehold over France. But the French people, indigenous and immigrant alike, aren’t falling for the trickery anymore. Sick of the Jewish-Zionist plutocracy and its shabbos goyim, they’re rising up. The support for Dieudo and his comrade Alain Soral is blasting through the roof and a growing resistance is demanding the dissolution of the entire corrupted system (90).

 

As it was stated in the beginning of this essay, Dieudo’s hardships are “a microcosm of the global Jewish-Zionist assault on genuine, unmitigated freedom of speech.” Amid his fight from the French front, a handful of significant events unfolded that only amplify this point.

 

Dieudonne 153

[Image] Regardless of the ban slapped on its old jerseys, Palestino defied Organized Jewish Interests and maintained the map of historic Palestine on its new design.

 

In December, a football club in Chile called Palestino, founded by the large Chilean Palestinian community, unveiled jerseys in which the number one is shaped like the map of historic Palestine. After Jewish organizations within Chile went ballistic about it, the jerseys were banned by the Chilean football federation in a move that can only be described as “1984ish” (91). Leading the pressure internationally was, as one could expect, the ADL and its abhorrent head, Abraham Foxman (92). Palestino though, in the typically resistant fashion of the Palestinian spirit, has rebuked the ban, maintaining the map of historic Palestine, albeit in a different design, and defiantly declaring, “We are not at the mercy of what the Jewish community likes or dislikes (93).”How’s that for a quenelle?!

 

Dieudonne 154

[Image] The “anti-Semitic” cartoon banned by the Economist after pressure from the likes of the ADL.

 

Following the bullying of Palestino came a bizarre incident with the Economist, a magazine partly owned by the ultra-Zionist Rothschild family (94). The Economist published a story about threats to the interim nuclear agreement with the Islamic Republic of Iran, and with it, a picture of the US Congress shackling President Obama and ostensibly keeping him from completing the deal. Featured on the symbol of the US was the six-pointed star also found on the usurping Zionist entity’s flag. Despite the fact that this is an accurate rendering of the congressional symbol, and that the six-pointed star can also be found on the back of the American one dollar bill, the Zionist Lobby, led yet again by the ADL, threw a monstrous fit, shrieking that the cartoon is “anti-Semitic”, and the Economist pulled the cartoon (95). Authenticity be damned.

 

Lastly, right on the heels of the Economist scandal, came the Orwellian ordeal of Mohamed Salah, a massively talented Egyptian football star signed by the British club Chelsea, owned by the aforementioned Jewish-Zionist gangster Roman Abramovich. Prior to the closing of the deal, Salah had to clarify why he didn’t shake hands with an “Israeli” team several months prior, and also repudiate all anti-Zionist statements attributed to him (96). What his political sentiments have to do with his outstanding gift on the field is anyone’s guess, but what certainly can be assumed is the condition placed on Salah was not about football. It was about control, something the Zionists have in abundance and something that they want to preserve wherever it is.

 

Dieudonne 155

[Image] Zion has declared war on your thoughts… Will you obey? Or will you resist?

 

While Dieudonné, Palestino, a political cartoon in an elitist magazine like the Economist and Mohamed Salah may not seem like they have much in common, in all actuality, they are as interconnected as the sun, moon and stars. There is something happening in the world. Something horrifying. Something that threatens the very way that humanity functions. This is not some post-apocalyptic dystopian future flick pumped out by the filth factory known as Jewish Hollywood. This is not a science fiction novel. This is not a soothsayer feeding you an unhealthy dose of gloom and doom. This is real. This is true. This is now. Right now. International Zionism has declared war on your thoughts and there are only two choices before you: be silent or be defiant.

 

If Organized Jewish Interests can tell you what to laugh at, what to wear, what to draw and what to say, then the next logical demand that they will ask, nay, order you to abide by will be what to think. Already, the divisions are being ignited. The so-called “Palestine Solidarity Movement”, in a follow-up to their attack on anti-Zionist, anti-Jewish-supremacist thinker, writer and activist Gilad Atzmon (81), have already shown where they stand, condemning Dieudo as an “anti-Semite” (97), in perfect lockstep with the Zionists they claim to be fighting. As Dieudo himself brightly noted in the Press TV interview noted earlier in this essay,

What I’m trying to say is that Zionism is dividing humanity. It is trying to rule by making us fight one another. They have organized all the wars and organized all the disorders on this planet (85).

 

Clearly, this concept just soars over the heads of these “solidarity” activists. They are blind to the big picture.

 

Dieudonne 156

[Image] Dieudonné understands that liberationism is the only way… Are you with him?

 

Are you with him? Zionism is not just an enterprise that illegally and genocidally occupies the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. Zionism is an enterprise that has illegally and genocidally colonized the globe. And if we do not recognize it as such, we will not go the victorious way of Iran and Hizbullah, but the tragic way of states and movements before them that no longer exist because they were trampled under the jackboot of imperialism and its parent company, International Jewish Finance.

 

Decolonization is our aim. And it is achievable with every little act of resistance. But the question is: How can we liberate our lands if our minds aren’t liberated in totality first? Liberate your mind! Let go of your fear! Scream at the top of your lungs:

Down with Holocaustianity! Down with Zionism! Down with Jewish supremacy! Down with ‘Israel’ and its imperialism! Down with the bankers led by the Rothschild clan and their capitalist disease! Down with slavery and oppression everywhere!

 

Once you’re done screaming, scream just a little more. Then a little bit more after that. Scream ‘till your voice is gone. But don’t you worry at that point, because there will be an army to your front, back, left and right, screaming just as loudly as you. If we all put our voices together, in a cacophony of resistance, there is nothing that humanity’s most terrible tyrants will be able to hold on to when the organic winds of change blow them away.

 

In unison with our ancestors, in honor of the martyrs who will undoubtedly fall on our chosen path of defiance over silence, and in solidarity with Dieudonné M’bala M’bala, let our screams shake the world.

 

 

~ End ~

 

 

 

Sources:

 

(1) Downing Denies Anelka Anti-Semitism by ESPN

(2) Nicolas Anelka: FA Charges West Brom Striker Over Gesture by BBC

(3) Zoopla To End West Brom Sponsorship Over Nicolas Anelka’s Quenelle Gesture by Sky Sports

(4) Jewish Community Urges FA To “Follow Through” On Anelka by Jewish News

(5) EI Exclusive: UK Charity With Mossad Links Secretly Denounced Anti-Zionist Jews To Government by Asa Winstanely, The Electronic Intifada

(6) David Bernstein: It’s Been A Game Of Two Halves by Simon Round, The Jewish Chronicle

(7) Israel And The UK Celebrate “Football For All” by Israeli Embassy London

(8) The Life And Rise Of Jews In Our Game by Patrick Barclay, London Evening Standard

(9) What Do Susan Sarandon, Alan Dershowitz And The Russian Mob Have In Common? by Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olam

(10) Nicolas Anelka faces Lengthy Ban After Controversial Quenelle Gesture by Sachin Nakrani, The Guardian

(11) Nicolas Anelka Receives Blow To Defence of Quenelle Salute by The Guardian

(12) ‘Zoopla’ Joins Gibberish Feud Over ‘Quenelle’ by Eddy Portnoy, The Jewish Daily Forward

(13) France’s Potential Breakdown by Riccardo Dugulin, Ynet

(14) How ‘Quenelle’ Salute Creator Dieudonne Built Bridge To Anti-Semitic Far Fight by Robert Zaretsky, The Jewish Daily Forward

(15) The Soccer Star Who’s Putting The Cool Back In Anti-Semitism by Anshel Pfeffer, Haaretz

(16) ADL Praises France For Crackdown On Anti-Semitic Comic Dieudonné by The Algemeiner

(17) Jewish Groups Praise French Government’s Commitment To Combat Anti-Semitism by The European Jewish Press

(18) Despicable Meme: Why The Quenelle Is the Grumpy Cat Of Anti-Semites by Liel Leibovitz, Tablet Magazine

(19) The Bête Noire Of The French Establishment by Diana Johnstone, Counter Punch

(20) French Cities Ban Comedian Dieudonné Over Nazi-Style ‘Quenelle’ Salute by The Algemeiner

(21) “Quenelle” Comic Dieudonne Wins Court Battle On Ban Over “Nazi” Gesture by The Jewish Daily Forward

(22) French Court Upholds Ban on ‘Quenelle’ Comic Dieudonné’s Shows by The Jewish Daily Forward

(23) Op-Ed: The Significance Of The Quenelle Gesture by Ron Jager, Arutz Sheva

(24) French Terror Attack: All The Hallmarks Of An Intelligence Psy-Op And False Flag by Kurt Nimmo, Empire Strikes Black

(25) Anti-Semitic Comedian Dieudonné In Hot Water With French Authorities by Vladislav Davidzon, Tablet Magainze

(26) The 9/11 Delusion: Israel’s False Flag, Jingoism And Inhumanity by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(27) 7/7: The Terror Drill, The Military Explosives And The Israeli Connection by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes Black

(28) 26/11: Mossad Terrorizes Mumbai by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(29) Jewish People Caught Framing Gentiles For “Anti-Semitic” Hate Crimes by Gilad Atzmon, Deliberation

(30) Israel Lobby Commits Major Blunder In France: Tries To Silence A Comedian And Dieudonné Strikes Back! by Radio Islam

(31) Dieudonné Backers Hack French Jewish Websites in “Operation Triple Quenelle” by The Jewish Daily Forward

(32) Exclusive: Dieudonné Breaks Silence On Quenelle by Sky News

(33) An Act Of Cruelty: An Audience With Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala, The Man Behind The Quenelle Salute by John Lichfield, The Independent

(34) France Intensifies Crackdown On Comic Dieudonné by The Global Post

(35) Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala: French Quenelle Comedian Banned From UK by Kim Willsher In Paris

(35a) All In The Family: David Cameron’s Jewish Roots And The Coreligionists Who Brought Him To Power by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes Black

(36) Is A New Revolution Quietly Brewing In France? by The Vineyard Of The Saker

(37) Face To Face With Dieudonné by Press TV

(38) Controversial French Comedian Asks Tehran For Clemency In Stoning Case by RFI

(39) Iranian, French Companies Team Up For Film Version Of Dieudonné Play by The Tehran Times

(40) Ofergate: The Latest Zionist Propaganda Blitz Against Iran by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(41) Smile And Let Them Die Of Rage! by Ibrahim al-Amin, Al-Akhbar English

(42) The Case Of Uri Avnery I: “Shukran, Israel” Analyzed And Refuted by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask Of Zion

(43) If Syria Falls, So Will Palestine, Hezbollah’s Nasrallah Warns In Speech by Jack Khoury, Haaretz

(44) Syria Attack: Where Does Hezbollah Stand? by Ibrahim al-Amin, Al-Akhbar English

(45) IDF Concerned Hezbollah Could Bring Israeli Ports To A Halt by Yoav Zitun, Ynet

(46) Israeli Generals: Hezbollah Rocketry Power Is Eighth in the World by Al-Manar

(47) Israeli General: We Cannot Defeat Hezbollah by Yahya Dbouk, Al-Akhbar English

(48) The Lowdown On Hezbollah’s Ambush in South Lebanon by Ibrahim al-Amin, Al-Akhbar English

(49) Dieudonné renonce à faire appel de sa condamnation pour diffamation envers Arthur by La Depeche

(50) French TV Host Arthur Cancels Israel Tour by Shirli Sitbon, Ynet

(51) An “Ethical Coffee” Challenge To Nespresso Heats Up by Gabrielle Serraz, World Crunch

(52) Israeli Airstrike Kills Three-Year-Old In Gaza by Al-Akhbar English

(53) The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Volume 1 by The Nation Of Islam’s Historical Research Department

(54) The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Volume 2: How Jews Gained Control Of The Black American Economy by The Nation Of Islam’s Historical Research Department

(55) Jews Selling Blacks: Slave Sale Advertising by American Jews by The Nation Of Islam’s Historical Research Department

(56) How Culpable Were Dutch Jews In The Slave Trade? by Cnaan Liphshiz and Iris Tzur, Jewish Telegraph Agency

(57) Jews Mostly Supported Slavery — Or Kept Silent — During Civil War by Ken Yellis, The Jewish Daily Forward

(58) 94-Year-Old Wins Second Annual Miss Holocaust Survivor Contest by Sammy Hudes, The Jerusalem Post

(59) Israel’s Unexpected Spinoff From A Holocaust Trial by Isabel Kershner, New York Times

(60) Quebec Court Fines Dieudonné $75,000 For Defamation by Janice Arnold, The Canadian Jewish News

(61) French Singer Patrick Bruel Lines Up An August Tel Aviv Concert! by IGoogledIsrael

(62) French Singer Patrick Bruel In Israel by IsraCast

(63) Lee Zeitouni Activists Disrupt French Singer’s Show by Yoav Malka, Ynet

(64) Tel Aviv University’s Role In Settler-Run Archaeological Dig “Playing Into Hands Of BDS,” Israeli Academics Complain by Ben White, The Electronic Intifada

(65) We’ve All Been Veiled From The Truth by Robert Fisk, Information Clearing House

(66) In Blow To Israel, French BDS Activists Acquitted Of Crime In Calling For Boycott by Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada

(67) Iran’s New Anti-Israel Ally: French Comedian Dieudonne by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu, Arutz Sheva

(68) Natalie Portman Shills For The Zionist War Machine And Spews Lies On Syria: Jewish Hollywood’s Power In Action by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask Of Zion

(69) Jewish Students Denounce Brussels University Debate On French Controversial Comic by The European Jewish Press

(70) The Zionist Infestation Of Africa: Zimbabwe To Uganda, Congo To Somalia And Beyond by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(71) James Crown: The Israeli Connection In The Madoff Scam by Christopher Bollyn

(72) How Scott Rothstein Rode $1.2 Billion Ponzi Scheme To Wealth And Power by Warren Richey, The Christian Science Monitor

(73) Jewish Con Men Shine In Oscar Nominations by Tom Tugend, The Jewish Journal

(74) Orthodox Jew Sentenced In $32 Million Ponzi Scheme by Shmarya Rosenberg, Failed Messiah

(75) SEC Halts Ponzi Scheme Targeting Persian Jews In LA by The Times Of Israel

(76) Kidnapped Developer’s Body Found In Dumpster by Larry Celona, Laura Italiano, Natasha Velez and Jamie Schram, The New York Post

(77) Two More Charged In Met Council Scam by The Jewish Journal

(78) Israeli Sources: Sharon Kept In A Coma For 8 Years So His Sons Could Collect His Three Pensions by Wayne Madsen, The Wayne Madsen Report/The Ugly Truth

(79) Iceland — The Hallmarks Of An Israeli Operation by Christopher Bollyn

(80) Israel’s Danny Rothschild And The Plundering of Iceland by Christopher Bollyn

(81) The Tribal Nexus: Zionists And “Anti-Zionists” Unite To Ensure The Survival Of “Israel” by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(82) The Zionist Mega-Scams of 9/11, Bernard Madoff And Allen Stanford by Christopher Bollyn

(83) Dieudonné And The Uses Of Anti-Semitism by Diana Johnstone, Counter Punch

(84) American Jews Cannot Conduct a Discussion of Jewish Power Out of Earshot of ‘the Goyim’ by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss

(85) French Comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala on Zionism by French Dissidents

(86) A French Jester Who Trades in Hate by Maia de la Baume, The New York Times

(87) Tony Parker, The ADL And The French Farrakhan by Tingba Muhammad, Nation of Islam Research Group

(88) The Accusation Of “Anti-Semitism” I: Zionism, “Jewish Israelis” And Revisionism by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(89) Blasphemy In Secular France by Diana Johnstone, Counter Punch

(90) State Repression In France Only Makes The Resistance Grow Stronger by The Vineyard Of The Saker

(91) Chile Bans Palestino Football Club “Anti-Israel” Shirt by BBC

(92) ADL Urges FIFA Action Over Chilean Team’s Jersey by Elad Benari, Arutz Sheva

(93) Chilean Soccer Team Defies League, Retains Palestine On Jersey by Ira Glunts, Mondoweiss

(94) The Rothschild Who Plans To Make Big Business Honest by James Ashton, The Independent

(95) ‘Economist’ Pulls Cartoon Showing Obama Shackled To Congress Bearing Star Of David by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss

(96) The Handshake Saga Of New £11m Chelsea Signing Mohamed Salah by Sam Wallace, The London Evening Standard

(97) Dieudonné Is An Anti-Semite And Should Be Rejected From The Pro-Palestinian Community by As’ad AbuKhalil, The Angry Arab News Service

 

—————————————————————-

 

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (5.5 MB). >>International Zionism’s Crusade Against Dieudonné

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2: Jan 7, 2017 — Improved formatting.

 

Version 1: Published Oct 19, 2014
Posted in Arabs, Auschwitz, Banksters, Brainwashing, Britain, Christainity, France, Freedom of Speech, Germany, Hervé Ryssen, Holocaust, Holohoax, International Finance, Israel, Jew World Order, Jews, Jews - Lying, Jews - Naming, Negros, New World Order, quenelle, Race, Race Differences, White Nationalism, WW II, Zionism, Zionists | Leave a comment

Hervé Ryssen interviewed by Margaret Huffstickler

 

Hervé Ryssen Interviewed

 

 

By Margaret Huffstickler

 

Barnes Review — Sep/Oct 2016

French researcher, author, teacher and historian Hervé Ryssen has been prosecuted 13 times for his writings and statements. But that is to be expected. His expertise is in Judaic studies. Here is his candid, one-on-one interview with TBR.

 

Hervé Ryssen explains Judaism is not a faith but the geopolitical project of a hysterical, incestuous master-race cult.

 

Hervé Ryssen, born in 1967, is a French writer and activist who specializes in Judaism as a geopolitical project, and graduated from the famous Sorbonne in Paris. He was fired for his views as a high school history teacher and became a militant with the Front National and then other groups. In 2003, he threw a pie in the face of a famous Catholic priest who, on television, had condoned illegal immigrants occupying his cathedral. He has been constantly fined and given prison sentences for denouncing Judaism, and especially the practice of incest in Jewish families, which he says makes Jews suffer from both inbreeding and hysteria. He is known for his definition of Judaism as a political project of world domination over a planet of uniform slaves.

 

His website: http: //herveryssen.over-blog.com/

 

Interview by Margaret Huffstickler in Paris for The Barnes Review magazine (httpt: //www.barnesreview.org)

 

 

 

 

       

 

 

TBR: Hello, Hervé Ryssen. Between 2005 and 2010, you published five major books on Judaism. We are in the age of the Internet, videos and blogs, but you persist in writing books. Why? Do young people in France still read?

 

HR: From 2005 to 2010, I actually published six, six major books [1] [2] on Judaism, which are the fruit of my research on the subject. It was in 2004 that I began systematically, voluminously, and daily to read Jewish authors, to devour books written by Jewish intellectuals, philosophers, sociologists, novelists, historians, etc. I realized that their thinking was extraordinarily uniform. Whether they were religious Jews or atheists, liberals, socialists or communists, Zionists [committed to Israel] or “fully integrated” [supposedly committed to their host country] I found in every epoch — and regardless of nationality or language of origin — the same ideas, the same paradoxes, and the same messianic expectations.

Continue reading

Posted in Arabs, Auschwitz, Christainity, France, Germany, Hervé Ryssen, Holocaust, International Finance, Israel, Jewish Problem/Question, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Naming, jews — persecution by, Negros, New World Order, Race, Race Differences, Thought Crime, Transcript, Western Civilization, White genocide, White Nationalism, Zionism | 2 Comments

Herve Ryssen – I am a Racist and an Anti-semite! – April 9, 2014 — TRANSCRIPT

I am a Racist and an Anti-semite!

 

By Herve Ryssen

 

 

To view this video [in French with English subtitles] please click on the link below or copy the URL into your browser.

Alternatively if this link is broken do a search for: “YouTube Hervé Ryssen I am a racist and an anti-semite”

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWu-NvN3K9I#t=52

 

 

 UPDATE: Oct 9, 2010 — The YouTube video has been taken down. It is available on BitChute here:

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/2zJHuXpfepK7/

 

 

Published on Apr 9, 2014

 

[NOTE: The following text and transcript — taken from the subtitles — has been edited lightly for clarity.

— KATANA]

 

YouTube Description

 

Hervé Ryssen, a french nationalist and prolific writer, has been harassed for years by jewish organizations. On March 28th he was sentenced for 3 months jail. Inspired by a video made by Paul Weston “I am a racist”, Hervé Ryssen made this more impassioned video, “I am a racist and an anti-semite”.

 

By the title, you can easily understand that Hervé Ryssen is a free thinker and has no taboos! He just says things as they are, no more, no less, and consequently he’s paying the price for it! You have to understand that French jails are filled with about 80 per cent aggressive non-White people and many at the top of the “French” government wish him to never get out alive. By sharing and promoting this vidéo and making his situation known is his only way to make it. Please share this video. Re-load it. Talk about him. It’s his right to speak up, and it’s our duty to defend him!

 

 

Transcript

 

[Opening Text]

On March, the 28th of 2014, French nationalist writer, Herve Ryssen, was sentenced to three months jail because of notorious jewish associations’ complaints.

Inspired by Paul Weston’s video [1]I Am a Racist”, Herve Ryssen has made his own video.

 

“I am a Racist and an anti-semite!”

 

[Hervé Ryssen, speaking to camera]

 

Why I am a racist and an anti-semite? I’m a racist just as all people on earth are, since time immemorial. Today of course , in our current society it’s easy to present oneself as an “anti-racist”, because all our cultural surroundings are pushing us to be anti-racist.

 

From school we are taught to love African, Chinese kids, that French society is multi-cultural. Then of course, throughout TV, news reports, radio, etc., everything is pushing us towards anti-racism. But that is only a European and Western specific thing!

 

Because in other places, such as African countries or the whole Asian continent, people love their culture! And they absolutely do not intend to open the gates of their countries to all the human races! To transform their multi-millennial societies into multi-cultural societies! Those ideas are only affecting Western societies!

 

Only White people are forbidden to live in their own countries among themselves! The way they lived among themselves for the last five thousand years!

Only White people are constantly having a finger pointed at them in movies produced by the Hollywood matrix!

Only White people are denied the right to have countries for their own kind.

Only White people, and White people alone, are living in such a state!

 

I am a racist because I’m a White man fighting for my human rights. This seems legitimate and natural to me! This does not imply any kind of hate towards others! Rather, we the White people, and as it happens, we the French people have the right to have a country for our own – France – as we did have for thousands of years.

 

This is our country! This country belongs to us, the French. The White European French people!

 

Just as Senegalese people have their own country. And as far as I know, Senegal is not a multi-cultural or a multi-racial society, even though some White people are living there. There are many jews living there as well, to make money. Because when it comes to exploiting the tropical forests, or exploiting petroleum, aluminum, tungsten, coal or diamonds, as in South Africa, there are always many jews.

 

Jews always favor a multi-cultural society, because for them, it’s the best way to go unnoticed.

 

“We are all brothers, we are all equals! We the jews, the blacks, the Arabs, we mix together, that way no one can perceive us.”

 

When I talked about American movies earlier I had essentially jewish movies in mind. As a matter of fact every time in a movie when you see a beautiful White blonde woman with an African man you can be sure that movie was made by a jew! Then there are the movie producers. Most movies are produced by jews. Like 100 per cent of them!

 

 

The film maker has something to say and as it happens, every time there is a blonde with a black man, every time there is a movie promoting race-mixing, you can be absolutely sure you are watching a jewish made movie! Just the same with anti-religious movies, especially the anti-Catholic ones more than the anti-Protestant movies. Anti-Catholic movies are always made by jews!

 

Just as with movies blaming White people, always showing them as despicable human beings. Movies about World War II are 100 per cent made by jewish film makers, such as Costa Gavras, [Roman] Polanski, Giles Paquet-Brenner, etc.

 

Well, all these [above] reasons make me a racist! And I say proudly that I’m a racist! Yes, a racist! I’m defending my own kind, the people who look like me. And I also believe that an ethnically homogenous society is the best system to ensure a peaceful society. People live in much greater harmony when they live among their own.

 

Opening one’s heart, one’s spirit to outsiders is a complete cosmopolitan [i.e., Jewish] utopia, a utopia coming straight from Zionists’ brains, or more factually, from jewish brains. Jews are always calling for race-mixing, equality and a multicultural society. But when jews are among themselves in a land they think is theirs, a state called Israel, they don’t call for tolerance or for a multi-cultural society. They affirm their identity and say:

 

“We are jews, Israel is a jewish country, this is our homeland, and we are going to erase Palestinian homes with our bulldozers!”

 

That’s what I have a problem with, this jewish double standard! When they are in a place they call home, they are extremely racist! But when they are in France, the USA, Australia, Brazil, Quebec or anywhere else they live, they adopt an anti-racist narrative, promoting a multi-cultural society, equality of rights etc.

 

It is these very people, the jews, who are destroying our countries! And it not for nothing that there’s been anti-semitism since time immemorial. Because the very essence of judaism is to destroy everything in order to enable the unification of the world. Only when “peace” is established on earth, that is, when every nation has been wiped out, when every race, ancestral tradition and religion has been destroyed, and only then according to the jews, will their Messiah come.

 

So, jews first have to establish “peace”, that is, destroy everything, before the jewish Messiah will come and establish the new Kingdom of David! That is what their eschatology is all about. That is their project!

 

That is why, I’m entirely and utterly anti-semitic, that is, I’m totally and absolutely against unification of the world and a world government! Judaism is essentially a political project.

 

Those are the reasons why I’m a racist and an anti-semite!

 

I know what I’m saying is an offence under Republican laws, laws that have been imposed on us by cosmopolitans. But I couldn’t care less because I’m not a Republican and I’m not a cosmopolitan!

 

Here in France, I’m home and I’m opposed to the [cosmopolitan] dictatorship! So if you want to put me in jail ( I’m talking to the system’s henchmen), you can do so. I won’t put up a fight. When I say I won’t put up a fight, it does though depend on the circumstances. In any case, one thing is for sure, I will not keep my mouth shut! And it appears to me that there are some others like me who also don’t want to shut up!

 

So then, this is it. The conflict is open, it is war, it is war my friends!

Again, I repeat it: I’m a racist and an anti-semite!

 

 

[Concluding Text]

 

French jails are filled with about 80 per cent aggressive non-White people. Helping to make Herve’s situation know world-wide is his only hope of exiting jail alive. Please share this video and contact the nearest French embassy to complain about free speech violation. Warn them that they will be held accountable if anything untoward happens to Herve Ryssen!

 

==========================================

NOTES

 

[1] Paul Weston’s video, “I am a racist“.

Available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67UjJHZ1W5o

 

==========================================

 

SEE ALSO

 

 

 

 

 

The following text is a summary of six books written by Hervé Ryssen, that came out between 2005 and 2010, constituting the most important study on the Jewish mind ever published.

 

==========================================

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (.2 MB). >> I’m a Racist and an Anti-semite

 

 

Version History

 

 

Version 3: Oct 10, 2020 — Added Cover. Added 1 image (A.W. Mann cartoon). Added NOTES.

 

Version 2: Oct 9, 2020 — Improved formatting. Re-uploaded an image and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version. Added SEE ALSO links. Added updated video link to BitChute.

 

Version 1: Published Oct 15, 2014.

Posted in Arabs, Black Crime, Christainity, France, Globalism, Hate Speech, Hervé Ryssen, International Finance, Israel, Jew World Order, Jewish Problem/Question, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Naming, Media - jewish domination, Mind Control, Negros, Race, Race Differences, Talmud, Third World Invasion, Transcript, Western Civilization, White genocide, White Nationalism, WW II, YouTube Censorship | 4 Comments

Living in Hitler’s Germany

 

 

Living in Hitler’s Germany

 

A letter from Hans Schmidt of GANPAC

 

 

[Image] Hans Schmidt [1]

Published in the Hoskins Report, Dec. 1993 Richard Kelly Hoskins, publisher

You asked for someone who had lived in Hitler’s Germany to tell what it was like. Permit me, someone who lived under the Swastika flag from 1935, when the Saar was reunited with Germany, to 1945, to give a short answer.

 

 

To be a boy or girl at that time was wonderful. In the Hitler Youth the differences between Christian denominations or the different German states didn’t count. We all truly felt that we were members of one body of people – one nation. Youth hostels were opened all over the Reich, enabling us to hike from one beautiful town to another seeing our fatherland. Every effort was made to strengthen our minds and bodies. Contrary to what is said today, we were encouraged to become free in spirit, and not to succumb to peer (or authority) pressure. In peacetime, NO military training was allowed by the Hitler Youth leadership; scouting yes. Incidentally, to “snitch on our parents” was frowned upon.

 

[Image] Myself, about 1942 or 1943 in the Firefighters’ Hitler Youth. This unit was organized so that we were able to assist regular fire fighters after air raids. The uniform would be a rarity today, it was made of good material of undetermined origin (possibly from French army stocks) of a brownish color with a black collar. Due to the fine manufacture of these uniforms, for which we did not have to pay, they were better suited to impress the girls than to fight British incendiary bombs. I do not know what eventually happened to mine.

 

At the very time when America’s allies, the Soviets, destroyed most of the Christian churches in Russia and Ukraine, about 2,500 new churches were built in Germany. NOT ONE Christian church was closed. It was the law that school and church had priority over service in the Hitler Youth. As late as the fall of 1944, the Waffen SS barracks in Breslau supplied two buses to take youth to either the nearest Catholic or Protestant church every Sunday. To be a registered member of a Christian church did not prevent advancement in the National Socialist Party.

 

Germany was National Socialist, but free enterprise flourished during the entire Hitler years. No company was nationalized. No small businessman was stopped from opening up his own store. I myself worked during the war for a company that can only be called part of international capitalism. If you owned shares, nobody confiscated them, like the allies did in 1945.

 

 

[Image] National Socialist Autobahn road network

 

The accomplishments of the ‘Nazis’ were incredible. Starting without money and with six million unemployed (a third of the workforce), they constructed the entire German Autobahn road network in a short span of 6 years – almost without corruption – while seeing to it that the new road system did not unnecessarily destroy either the German landscape, or wildlife habitats and forests. Two years after the NS were elected to power, conditions were so improved that workers had to be hired in nearby friendly countries to help alleviate the worker’s shortage in Germany. Germany was booming while Britain, France and the US were in the depths of depression.

 

 

[Image] Adolf Hitler at the presentation of the Beetle

 

To help the workers get cheap transportation, the VW was designed and a factory was being built for their manufacture when the war started. Also, for the common people, villages of small single family homes were erected. The monthly payments were set so low that almost anyone could afford his own house. In Hitler’s Germany there were no homeless; no beggars. Crime was almost non existent because habitual criminals were in concentration camps. All this was reported in the newspapers and was known by everybody.

 

The German press during the Third Reich had fewer taboos than the American press today. The only taboo I can think of evolved around Hitler, and, during the war, there was a law that prohibited “defeatism”. This was because of the negative role the German press played in the German defeat of 1918.

 

It bears remembering that the “European Economic Community” was first coined by the Third Reich government. I remember many articles, both pro and con about this subject. One should also not forget that during the war at least seven million foreign nationals (nearly 10% of the population) worked in Germany, either as voluntary workers (Dutch, Danes, French, Poles, Ukrainians come to mind), or as forced laborers or as prisoners. I know of no instance where foreigners were attacked or molested (much less killed) because they were foreigners. Speaking of the press, I have an article from 1943 in my possession that spells out how necessary friendship is between the German and Russian peoples.

 

Between 1933 and 1945 there was a tremendous emphasis on culture: theatres flourished; the German movie industry produced about 100 feature films per year (of which not one was anti-American. Only 50 of them can be considered pure propaganda movies). Some the best classical recordings still extant were made in Hitler’s Germany. Actors from all over Europe, but mainly from France, Sweden and Italy were stars in German movies.

 

Germany always loved sports, and there was no lack of opportunities to partake in any sport one liked. The 1936 Berlin Olympics was merely a showcase of what transpired all over the Reich. In a book on these Olympics issued by the Hitler Youth that is still in my possession, Jesse Owens is shown several times and mentioned favorably.

 

 

[Image] Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin

 

During the Schmeling boxing fights, we kids all knew of Joe Louis, the brown bomber. Nowhere did I ever read derogatory remarks about other races. Certainly the accomplishments of Germany and the Germans were given prominence, similar to ‘the ad nauseum’ statements of today that the U.S. is the land of the free, etc. In my ten years in the Hitler Youth (actually 8, since I obviously couldn’t attend while a soldier), the Jews were never mentioned. Other sports that gripped our attention were flying (there was Hitler Youth flying training with their own sail planes), car races (British and Italian drivers dominated) and riding.

 

Frequently I am asked about gun control during the Hitler era. Claims are made that Hitler could take power because he disarmed the German people. That is nonsense. In Germany gun ownership was never as prevalent as it is in America. I would say that for hundreds of years one needed a gun license in order to keep a weapon.

 

[Image] Our service in the Hitler Youth did not take all of our time, as seen from this picture of 1938. We had invited playmates form the neighborhood to play soldiers. Note the real weapons from our attic. Two guns were old flintlock rifles. One of the swords was a beautiful, hand engraved antique. All these weapons probably ended up as war booty in America. The headgear was from prior wars. Of the five boys at the top, Kurt Seiler, myself [arrowed], RolfBorschel and Erich Seiler served in the Waffen-SS. Kurt died in Hungary, Erich rose after the war to a high police rank, Rolf was unlucky enough to get caught in the French dragnet of 1947 (which I escaped) and ended up a slave worker in Lille.

 

On the other hand, my father owned an old pistol clandestinely (about which we children knew), and there were gun clubs all over the Reich. Furthermore, Germany was always a country with many excellent gunsmiths. It is doubtful that they could stay in business if the laws were too stringent. I would surmise that while Germany was Germany (before it was ‘liberated’ by the allies) gun ownership probably was far more widespread than is acknowledged today. Laws on the books were mainly to give the police a handle to arrest criminals with guns, not the ordinary citizen. Incidentally, just as Hitler had forbidden so-called ‘punishment exercises’ in the army (the brutal methods still employed in the American army), so had he forbidden the use of clubs by the police. He considered it demeaning to the German people.

 

Finally this:

I don’t believe I’ll ever see again a people as happy and content as were the great majority of Germans under Hitler, especially in peacetime. Certainly some minorities suffered: former parliamentary politicians – because they couldn’t play their political games; the Jews – because they lost their power over Germany; the gypsies – because during the war they were required to work; and crooked union bosses – because they lost their parasitical positions.

 

To this day I believe that the happiness of the majority of a people is more important than the well-being of a few spoiled minorities. In school there should be emphasis on promoting the best and the intelligent, as was done in Germany during the Hitler years – a fact that contributed after the war to the rapid German reconstruction. That Hitler was loved by his people, there can be no question. Even a few week’s before the war’s end and his death, he was able to drive to the front and mingle among the combat soldiers with only minimum security. None of the soldiers had to unload their weapons before meeting with the Fuhrer (as was required when President Bush met with American soldiers during the Gulf War).

 

Germany under Hitler was quite different from what the media would have you believe.

 

__________________________

 

 

Footnotes

 

[1] Hans Schmidt (April 24, 1927 – May 30, 2010) was a German and naturalized American citizen, former member of the Waffen-SS, and founder of the German-American National Political Action Committee (GAN-PAC).

Schmidt was born on April 24, 1927, in Völklingen, a town in the then League of Nations mandate of the Saar Basin between Germany and France. During the National Socialist period, he was a member of the Hitler Youth, and, by his own account, joined the Waffen SS at the age of 17, and served as a corporal in the SS Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler, originally the personal bodyguard regiment of Adolf Hitler, later a Panzer division of the Waffen-SS. Schmidt was wounded twice and participated in the Battle of the Bulge. He arrived in the United States in 1949.

 

GAN-PAC

 

In 1983, Schmidt founded the German-American National Political Action Committee (GAN-PAC), which published the GANPAC Brief in English and the USA-Bericht in German.

Schmidt is the author of several books and articles including; SS Panzergrenadier: A True Story Of World War II.

From Amazon: This is the autobiographical true story and personal narrative of the German side of WWII. The author recounts the reasons that led him to decide to join the Waffen-SS in 1943 at the age of 16. He details his service in the German Labor Service (RAD) prior to induction into and training with the W-SS in 1944. The author recounts his extensive schooling prior to posting with the Leibstandarte SS Panzer Div., and his personal experiences in combat with the unit in the Ardennes and the final battles on the Eastern Front in Hungary, ending with American captivity. HB, 20 previously unpublished photos from author’s collection.

 

 

 

—————————————————————-

 

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (1.5 MB). >>

Living in Hitler’s Germany – Ver 2

 

 

Version History

Version 4: Jan 25, 2020 — Re-upoladed images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

 

Version 3: Nov 16, 2016 — Improved formatting.

 

Version 2: May 23, 2015 — Minor typo fixes, formatting. Added image to cover, added Version History & Notes page to PDF.

 

Version 1: Published Oct 12, 2014

Posted in Germany, Hitler, Hitler Youth, Holocaust, Jews, National Socialism, Propaganda - Anti-German, Revisionism, Third Reich, Waffen SS, WW II | 4 Comments

Historians or Hoaxers?

 

 

Historians or Hoaxers?

 

 

The Unprofessional Disdain of Academic Historians

 

for Documenting the Holocaust

 

Carl Wernerhoff

 

https://www.germanvictims.com/

http://www.germanvictims.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/HistoriansOrHoaxers.pdf

 

[Note: The above website, german victims.com, has many interesting articles in both English and German — well worth a visit.]

Historians sometimes think of themselves as truth tellers and iconoclasts. One Canadian historian, for example, places the following quotation from Khrushchev as an epigraph at the head of her website:

Historians are dangerous people. They are capable of upsetting everything.[1]

Yet this is only true of real historians, those who are prepared to tell the truth about the past without fear or favour. It is doubtful that more than a handful of such historians have appeared in any given century.

Certainly, there is little reason to attribute to academic historians today either truth telling or iconoclastic potential. Indeed, it is hard to think of a single academic historian who has ruffled a politician’s feathers in a very long time, let alone one who has rocked a political establishment. [2] The risks of genuine scholarly independence, such as loss of tenure, the loss of prestige, professional and social ostracism, and the loss of a means of livelihood are so great that they ensure that most academics conform to the expectations of their peers and the heads of their institutions.

One only has to be aware of the trials and tribulations of New Zealand historian Joel Hayward, whose 1991 M.A. thesis gave a fair, and in certain respects sympathetic assessment of Holocaust revisionism, to appreciate the fact that an historian who upsets things has no future in academia. [3]

 

 

[Image] Joel Hayward

In 2002, Hayward was forced by the pressure of the controversy over his M.A. to resign his tenured position as a Senior Lecturer in Defence and Strategic Studies at Massey University, Canterbury, N.Z. Although Hayward is now employed again (apparently by a British military college), his website trumpets the fact that he is a ‘NON-REVISIONIST scholar.’ In short, if Hayward is working as an historian again today, it is only because these days he flaunts his non-revisionism and his philo-Zionism. (He maintains, for example, that ‘Israel clearly has a right to exist within its current borders.’) Given that his latest book is about Lord Nelson, it also looks like a condition of his current employment is that he stays well away from WWII-related subjects.

The result for Hayward is probably the BEST that could be expected for any academic who shows even the slightest objectivity in relation to the Holocaust. Today, academic historians are the zealous watchdogs of orthodoxy, the political religion of post-WWII liberal democracy. Subscribing to this religion is now mandatory — we are talking about an orthodoxy that is as rigidly enforced as any in any historical period, not excluding under dictatorships such as those of Hitler and Stalin.

Although this political religion lacks a name, its dogmas — which comprise the core of what most ordinary people think they know about modern history — include the following:

1. The Nazi regime was the most evil which has ever existed.

2. Hitler was the most evil man who has ever lived.

3. Hitler and the Nazis cannot be viewed negatively enough because they perpetrated the most evil crime ever perpetrated, the Holocaust. This was an evil plan, the most evil ever devised, to exterminate the Jews. The plan was the fruit of Hitler’s radical anti-semitism.

4. WWII was a good war because it led to the overthrow of Hitler and the Nazis. It doesn’t matter an iota how many people were killed in the war, because the removal of the Nazi regime was a good at any price.

5. Winston Churchill is one of the greatest men in history because only he realized how truly evil the Nazis were. If it wasn’t for him, England may never gone to war with Germany and the Nazi regime might not have been overthrown, with consequences too terrible to even think about.

6. Stalin was nearly as bad as Hitler, but at least he didn’t try to exterminate the Jews and at least he helped overthrow the Nazis. However, he did confine many of his political enemies to gulags, which were pretty much the same things as concentration camps, so he was still very, very bad.

7. Hitler and Stalin headed totalitarian regimes of right and left respectively.

8. Because both leftwing and rightwing totalitarianism are so bad, the only viable political alternative to either is liberal democracy.

9. Because liberal democracy overthrew Hitler and the Nazis, it proves just how virtuous and benevolent it is.

10. You cannot say anything good about Hitler. If you do, it means you are a crypto-Nazi and therefore as bad as Hitler yourself.

11. It is not permissible to say anything that would suggest that Nazi crimes were not as bad as historians maintain. If you do, it means you are seeking to ‘minimise’ Nazi crimes. Anyone who seeks to ‘minimise’ Nazi crimes has to be a crypto-Nazi. On the other hand, you are allowed to say that Nazi crimes were even worse than historians previously maintained. While it is not permissible to ‘minimize’ Nazi crimes, it is permissible, indeed actually encouraged, to maximise them, even if you’re lying.

12. It is not permissible to say anything bad about Jews, who have always and everywhere been totally innocent and unfairly persecuted. To criticise Jews is to engage in anti-semitism, and no matter how different the circumstances may be anti-semitism always has the potential to trigger another Holocaust.

13. Under no circumstances can you say that WW II was fought for the benefit of the Jews. You have to say that it was fought for ‘democracy.

14. Since the Allies’ aim was to overthrow the Nazi dictatorship, nothing the Allies did during the war, no matter how heinous, and whether it was done to the Germans or to someone else, can legitimately be construed as a ‘war crime.’ To describe an act of the Allies as a war crime is to suggest that there is no inherent moral difference between Allied acts and Nazi acts. To even suggest that the Allies could have committed war crimes is a sign of crypto-Nazism.

15. The Nuremberg trials were a massive leap forward for human moral development, as war criminals were prosecuted as such for the first time.

 

 

Of course, academic historians do not teach these dogmas in the same open and honest way that, say, a Catholic priest teaches the dogmas of the Catholic church. Rather, because students come to University already steeped in the modern political religion academic historians are free to assume them and their writings constitute large-scale elaborations of them. The dogmas are perpetuated not by being taught explicitly, but by ensuring that they are the only conclusions that can legitimately be drawn from history.

Of all the dogmas I have just described, the only one which might be regarded as open to debate is whether Hitler was worse than Stalin. Some people would insist that Stalin was worse, since his regime killed many more people. However, the idea that the Holocaust is the most evil crime ever perpetrated tends to reinforce the conclusion that Hitler was worse, although the obvious implication — that Jewish lives are worth more than Russian lives — is left unuttered (because drawing attention to the fact that Jewish lives are to be regarded as more important than other people’s lives is something that you would only do if you were motivated by anti-semitism).

Of all the dogmas of the political religion whose caretakers academic historians have become, by far the most important — perhaps because it’s also the least defensible — is dogma #3: that Hitler and the Nazis implemented a programme for the extermination of the Jews.

Academic historians are complicit in the perpetuation of this political dogma mainly by omission — that is to say, by neglecting to do their jobs properly. They 1) overlook the fact that there is no material evidence to support the Holocaust hypothesis and 2) take for granted the authenticity of the documents which they cite, in lieu of material evidence, as proof that the Nazis tried to exterminate the Jews.

Let me expand on these two points:

 

1. The utter disregard of material evidence

 

Academic historians normally treat material (i.e., physical) evidence as conclusive (unless, of course, it is subsequently proven to be inauthentic). For example, if a Roman map did not show a city in a certain location, but archaeologists discovered Roman-era ruins at this location, historians would conclude that there had been a city there in Roman times, not that the city could not possibly have been there because it wasn’t mentioned in Roman documents. Conversely, if a town was drawn at an identifiable location on a Roman map and archaeologists had failed to turn up so much as a potsherd at that place, most historians would conclude that the mapmaker had made a mistake, not that the mapmaker was right and that all traces of the settlement had been obliterated by the ravages of time.

Yet in the case of the Holocaust, the dearth of material evidence for the existence of large-scale extermination programme is not perceived as significant. It is assumed that the Nazis destroyed their vast death machinery so thoroughly as to preclude all possibility of postwar detection. It is not permissible to express doubts as to whether the Nazis could really have eliminated all material evidence so completely, including making the ashes of six million people vanish from the locations at which they must have been interred. To think such doubts is to engage in thought crime; and to verbalize the doubts, hate crime.

It is therefore more acceptable for academic historians today to assume that the Nazis had magical powers — that is, the ability to make material evidence disappear beyond hope of recovery, even by means of the most sophisticated modern technology — than it is to conclude that the lack of material evidence supports the allegations of Holocaust revisionists.

 

2. A cavalier attitude towards documentary evidence

 

Given the non-existence of material evidence, documentary evidence is obviously critical to reasoned belief in the Holocaust. While the majority of the public seems happy to accept eyewitness testimonies as a sufficient basis for their exterminationist beliefs, for scholars,

the faintest ink is usually a more reliable foundation for historical analysis than the strongest memory.[4]

Holocaust scholars seem to be divided on the question of whether documents exist that refer to the alleged Nazi programme for the extermination of the Jews. In Harvest of Hate (1979), Léon Poliakov specifically avers that with respect to this programme ‘no documents have survived, perhaps none ever existed.[5] Yet on the back cover of Steve Hochstadt’s Sources of the Holocaust (2004), the author Judith Magyar Isaacson is quoted as saying that that Hochstadt’s collection, ‘documents [the Holocaust’s] perpetration with painstaking accuracy.

Although Isaacson is clearly exaggerating here — if there were such documents it is hard to see how Poliakov could not have been aware of them — there does seem to be a growing tendency to assert that a corpus of Holocaust documents exists which, while far less complete that we would like, is nonetheless adequate for the purpose of affirming the existence of a Nazi extermination programme.

Unfortunately, academic historians have failed to concern themselves with the question of the authenticity of the documents they cite as evidence for the Holocaust. They neglect such crucial matters as the provenance of the documents, the accuracy with which they have been translated, and whether their meanings are being construed fairly.

A striking but never discussed fact about Holocaust historiography is that its key documents are all of unproven authenticity. Most of the documents academic Holocaust historians have taken to citing are, in fact, no more than mere transcriptions. By far the majority appeared for the first time during the Nuremberg trials, and were prepared for the court by the Documentation Division of the Office of the U.S. Chief of Counsel (OCC) in Paris, an organization that subsumed the OSS’s Evidence Collection and Analysis Section in London. In other words, many if not most of the documents used in the Nuremberg trials originated with the OSS, the wartime precursor of the CIA.

Very little is known about either the OSS’s Evidence Collection and Analysis Section or the OCC’s Documentation Division. Matters such as the provenance of the documents cited at Nuremberg are apparently of little interest to historians generally. To my knowledge, no historians go beyond the transcriptions which were used during the postwar war crimes trials to seek out original documents — something which would be inexcusable in almost any other avenue of historical enquiry.

To be sure, one reason for this is that in most cases it is impossible to say where the originals are held today, if indeed they exist at all.

 

[Image] Carlos Whitlock Porter

Carlos Whitlock Porter, an American-born professional translator who apparently today lives in Germany, is the only person I know of who has looked into this matter, and he has established that no institution acknowledges possessing any original documents:

 

The standard version of events is that the Allies examined 100,000 documents and chose 1,000 which were introduced into evidence, and that the original documents were then deposited in the Peace Palace at The Hague. This is rather inexact. … The Hague has few, if any, original documents. The Hague has many original postwar “affidavits,” or sworn statements, the Tribunal Commission transcripts, and much valuable defense material. They have the “human soap,” which has never been tested, and the “original human soap recipe” (Document USSR-196), which is a forgery; but apparently no original wartime German documents. … The National Archives in Washington … claim that the original documents are in The Hague. The Hague claims the original documents are in the National Archives. The Stadtsarchiv Nurnberg and the Bundesarchiv Koblenz also have no original documents, and both say the original documents are in Washington. Since the originals are, in most cases, “copies,” there is often no proof that the documents in question ever existed.[6]

 

The reality, therefore, is that the bulk of the ‘evidence’ for the Holocaust derives from a corpus of documents that was expressly manufactured by the OSS and OCC in 1945-46 for the purpose of incriminating the leaders of the former German government at Nuremberg. The procedure went roughly along these lines: the Documentation Division in Paris created ‘copies’ (in English only), certified them as true, and sent them to the prosecution in Nuremberg, while the original documents (if they ever existed) were never seen or heard of again. German translations of the original English texts were then prepared and sent to the defense in Nuremberg, where they arrived as late as possible so that the defense had insufficient time to worry about such matters as their authenticity.

Few professional historians can be unaware that original documents and only original documents qualify as evidence. Without access to the original of the document it professes to transcribe, there is no way for an historian to tell whether a given transcription is accurate. Transcriptions may conceal interpolations and excisions, while translations can involve interpolations, excisions, misleading translations and even the fabrication of entire passages. Many Holocaust documents can legitimately be suspected of being wholesale fabrications.

Although many documents were certainly fabricated, the Documentation Division in Paris seems rarely to have been required to forge documents. The procedure followed at Nuremberg, which assigned evidentiary value to mere ‘copies,’ avoided the need for original documents. The defence, on the other hand, had no power to insist that original documents be used.

The real problem was the risk of authentic documents coming to light which would contradict the fabricated documents. We can assume that as the Nuremberg trials proceeded authentic documents that had the potential to create conflicts with forged documents were secreted away in inaccessible locations. Given the fact that an extremely large proportion of the total corpus of Nazi documents remains inaccessible to historians even today — historians have probably never had access to more than a small sample of the documents captured by the Allies in the closing stages of the war — we can safely assume that most original documents that would resolve questions concerning the Holocaust are destined never to be made public. Many may even have been destroyed in order to ensure the enduring success of the hoax. (If it was a hoax, of course. A theoretical possibility is that genuine documents had to be suppressed for another reason, perhaps because they point to the complicity of the U.S. corporations that worked hand in glove with the Nazis during the war.)

Another potential problem was the appearance of individuals associated with the Nazi regime who would have had the ability to expose the OSS/OCC documents as fabrications. The need to prevent this from ever happening would explain why, starting in May 1945 with the alleged suicides of SS-General Hans-Adolf Prützmann, SS head Heinrich Himmler and SS-General Odilo Globocnik while in British captivity, there followed a bizarre string of murders of individuals associated with the Auschwitz concentration camp. (These were perpetrated by a Jewish hit squad known as the DIN. [‘din’ being the Hebrew for revenge]) As Joseph Bellinger, author of a new book on Himmler’s murder, points out,

 

within six months or so of the war’s end practically any one who could have shed light on the Jewish policy of the Third Reich was murdered![7]

 

This, it must be said, was extremely convenient for the prosecution at Nuremberg.

So we therefore encounter a striking paradox. Although the Holocaust is considered by many historians to be the central event of the 20th century and also one of the most important events in history, the standards which are applied to the study of the Holocaust are lower than those which would apply in, for example, a minor property dispute in a local court. Yet if the Holocaust is to be elevated to its present status as central event of the 20th century, it is obvious that it must meet a higher standard of proof, not a lower one.

To be blunt: if historians are going to tell people that the Holocaust is one of the most important events in history, they better have overwhelming evidence to back up their extraordinary claims. So far, though, they have not lived up to their responsibility. Despite the gravity of the subject, which demands the greatest scrupulousness, they remain suspiciously cavalier about documenting the Holocaust, as though it were the one historical event that transcends the historian’s craft.

In the case of the rush to impute to the Nazis a programme for the extermination of millions of people which has implausibly left no material traces, all the normal rules of historiography seem not only to have been suspended, but to have been violated over and over again. Historians routinely cite documents from secondary works like Raul Hilberg’s The Destruction of the European Jews (1961) or from printed collections of documents, such as Robert Wolfe’s Holocaust: The Documentary Evidence — but they never cite original documents.

Dirk Moses of the University of Sydney’s History Department: an example of the kind of academic hack under discussion. (For an excellent critique of Moses’s disingenuous treatment of Holocaust revisionism, see here [http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters/toben2.htm].) Moses reportedly refers to people who think there ought to be evidence for the Holocaust as ‘crazed positivists.’ Who would want to study history with this guy?

In short, whether or not the Holocaust took place, the historiography of the Holocaust is a house of cards: it is a vast edifice constructed on the precarious foundation of mere transcriptions of documents which have never been examined by those who cite them and whose authenticity has never been and probably never can be established. One wonders how many academics have been honest enough to share this information with their students.

Given the powerful challenge mounted to Holocaust orthodoxy by revisionism, the documentary status quo seems remarkable. You would think that by now academic historians would be demanding free and unfettered access to original documents for the purpose of using them to refute revisionist opponents. You would think that the numerous websites that have proliferated in recent years aimed at refuting revisionism would be bristling with scanned images of original documents, which would make mincemeat of the doubting Thomas’s. [8] Yet every such website of which I am aware — and every book which follows the same agenda — aims to persuade by means of mere transcriptions. [9]

Clearly, academic historians are only interested in historical truth so long as it does not upset any of the central dogmas of the modern political religion. To affirm that religion, they enthusiastically write the history of WWII using documents of doubtful authenticity and entirely disregard revisionist writings, even though the latter constitute the only form of independent quality control in the field of Holocaust studies. (You don’t think peer review exists in any meaningful sense in Holocaust studies, do you? How could it, in such an atmosphere of intimidation and persecution?)

As both a credentialled historian and a member of the interested public I must say that I find myself heartily sick of the appalling state of academic historiography today. Because they show a disgraceful disregard of issues such as the provenance of Holocaust documents, academic historians deserve to be dismissed as handmaidens of a monumental hoax rather than devotees of the truth.

The current generation of academic historians seems to me to consist of crooks, liars and gullible fools — and I would not hesitate to apply the latter accusation to several prominent academic historians I know personally who have published on the subject of the Holocaust (including one who maintains, quite seriously, that Elie Wiesel’s farcical Night is by the far the best book on Auschwitz).

But what else can we expect, when professional history is in the service of a dogmatic religion rather than historical truth?

______________________

Notes

 

[1] http://www.nipissingu.ca/faculty/annec/HIST3926W/Outline.htm

[2] The biggest academic controversy in recent years took place in 2001-2 and concerned a book, Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture, by Michael Bellesiles, who was at the time Professor of History at Emory University, Atlants, Georgia, U.S. However, this controversy concerned trivial offences against historiographical conventions which are committed routinely by all historians writing large books, especially ones on subjects which have not been extensively researched before; the controversy was really nothing more than a rightwing beat-up. In most such cases, even when the work is considerably sloppier, views are challenged and modified over the years as the historiography of the subject grows and becomes more sophisticated. As for iconoclasm, the closest to an iconoclastic academic historian I can think of is Professor Justin McCarthy professor of history at the University of Louisville in Louisville, Kentucky, who argues convincingly that the alleged Armenian holocaust is a fabrication.

[3] For Hayward’s overview of the affair, see:

http://www.joelhayward.com/myoverviewoftheaffair.htm

http://www.fpp.co.uk/BoD/origins/Hayward/NZHerald220703c.html

[4] John Costello, Mask of Treachery, Pan Books, 1989, p. xvii.

[5] Léon Poliakov, Harvest of Hate, New York, Holocaust Library, 1979, p. 108, cited in Jürgen Graf, The Giant With Feet of Clay: Raul Hilberg and his Standard Work on the Holocaust”, Capshaw, Alabama [U.S.], Theses & Dissertations Press, 2001, p. 19.

[6] http://www.cwporter.com/g3803ps.htm

[7] http://www.cwporter.com/d2.htm

 

Himmlers Tod. Freitod oder Mord? Die letzten Tage des Reichsführers-SS. (Himmler’s death. Suicide or murder? The last days of the Reichsführer-SS)

For a good review of the book by Fredrick Toben, please see: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters1/Toben/toben_bellinger.htm

 

Joseph P. Bellinger 

 

 

Quotes

The convergence of available evidence from all released sources provide more than ample justification to conclude that Heinrich Himmler, and a number of other high level officials in the Nazi SS organisation, were indeed assassinated as part of a pre-determined plan advanced by Churchill’s cabinet.

These facts have all been fully investigated and meticulously documented in my book, Himmlers Tod.

In respect to the assassination of Heinrich Himmler, et. al., the evidence that did survive reveals that:

1        Tentative plans were discussed and enthusiastically advocated by Churchill and his closest advisors to assassinate selected German and Italian officials within a few hours of capture.

2        The autopsy report of Heinrich Himmler was falsified, incomplete, and evidence was fabricated.

3        Material evidence relating to the homicide was removed at the site.

4       The participants in the crime were instructed not to divulge any details [other than the officially released version] to the public or to researchers insofar as their role in the events was concerned and they were bound to the rule of official secrecy thereafter.

5        Post-war accounts from the individuals in private diaries provided additional information supporting the conclusion that foul play was involved in the death of the German leader.

6        At least two of the participants were later decorated with the MBE for their role in the affair.

7        Material evidence relating to the crime was erased after the war at the express insistence of the War Office.

8        The records surrounding the ‘official’ inquiry into the circumstances of Himmler’s death have been sealed until the end of the century.

I had reconstructed from the available documentary evidence in the form of private diaries, forensic evidence, eyewitnesses to the events and recently released papers from the archives in the United States and Great Britain led me to the ineluctable conclusion that the chief of the Gestapo and SS was assassinated for very specific reasons related to the postwar Allied occupation of Germany. The attendant circumstantial evidence I had uncovered and assembled was so powerful and incriminating that I had no need of Mr. Allen’s documents to support my thesis.  However, if the documents turned out to be authentic, they would have provided the icing on the cake. The Case of the Feckless Forger: The Forgery of a Forgery

 

 

[8] From this point of view, the best exerminationist website is Mazal.org, which currently offers photographic reproductions of 25 original documents, including 23 from the Auschwitz State Museum concerning the construction of the crematories. (Although this is only 23 pages out of at least 88,000 pages of Auschwitz Central Construction Office documents that were captured by the Red Army in 1945, it is better than nothing.) Although a number of additional documents on Mazal.org are represented as ‘German Original’ documents, this is a deception. The documents so identified are all inscribed in English as ‘certified true copies,’ meaning that they are postwar creations. They are not authentic Nazi-era documents but belong to the class of documents that were prepared for the Nazi war crimes trials by the Documentation Division of the OCC in Paris.

[9] Here are a few examples of the websites to which I refer:

The Nizkor Project

A Teacher’s Guide to the Holocaust

Documentary Resources on the Nazi Genocide and its Denial

The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

The Jewish Holocaust 1933-1945

 

—————————————————————-

 

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (2.0 MB). >> Historians or Hoaxers? – Ver 2

 

===============================================

 

See Also:

 

 

The World’s First Anti-Holocaust Convention — Instauration Dec, 1979

An Open Letter to New Jersey’s Governor

Historians or Hoaxers?

House of Orwell

Misha: Surviving with Wolves or …

Bradley Smith’s Smith Report # 1

The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies

The Plum Cake

 

 

 

Auschwitz: Myths and Facts

Powers and Principalities XI – Ewen Cameron, MK-Ultra, Holocaust Revisionism — TRANSCRIPT

Tales of the Holohoax – A Historian’s Assessment – Part 1

The Holocaust Lie — Made in America

Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained — TRANSCRIPT

Jim Rizoli Interviews Prof Robert Faurisson, Oct 2015 — TRANSCRIPT

Holocaust Eyewitnesses: Is the Testimony Reliable?

Alain Soral – My Homage to Robert Faurisson, Oct 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Inside Auschwitz – You’ve never seen THIS before! — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

Amazion Bans 100s of Holocaust Revisionist Books!

AUSCHWITZ – A Personal Account by Thies Christophersen

Jim Rizoli Interviews Bradley Smith — TRANSCRIPT

London Forum – Alfred Schaefer – Psychological Warfare – TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report Interviews Eric Hunt — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio – Germar Rudolf – Persecution of Revisionists & Demographic Disaster – Part 1— TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio: Nicholas Kollerstrom — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice TV – Ingrid Carlqvist – Scandal in Sweden When Ingrid Questions the Unquestionable — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Carolyn Yeager on Johnson vs Anglin debate — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

============================================

Version History

 

Version 5: Apr 28, 2026 – Updated image links.

Version 4: Jan 27, 2020 – Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version. Added See Also links.

 

 Version 3: Aug 17, 2015 – Added Cover image, updated PDF to Ver 2.

 

Version 2: Oct 9, 2014 – Added quotes from Joseph J. Bellinger in Notes

Version 1: Published Oct 9, 2014

Posted in Germany, Holocaust, Jews, National Socialism, Propaganda - Anti-German, Revisionism, Third Reich, WW II | 3 Comments

Nuremberg and Other War Crimes — Part 3

Nuremberg - Harwood 001

 

Nuremberg

 

and

 

Other War Crimes Trials:

 

a New Look

 

[Part 3]

 

by

Richard Harwood

 

1975

 

CONTENTS

 

Introduction ……………………………………….. 1

 

Facts & Figures …………………………………… 1

 

The Scene is Set …………………………………. 3

 

The Occupation …………………………………… 5

 

De-Nazification …………………………………… 7

The Role of the OSS ……………………………. 9

 

Belsen ………………………………………………….. 11

 

The International Military Tribunal … 11

 Jackson’s Speech ………………………………. 18

 Psychology of Defendants …………………. 19

 The Defendants ………………………………… 19

 The Witnesses …………………………………… 29

 The Sentences …………………………………… 34

 The Executions ………………………………….. 34

 The Imprisonments ……………………………. 34

 

The American Military Tribunal ……….. 35

 AMT4 …………………………………………………. 36

 AMT6 …………………………………………………. 37

 AMT7 …………………………………………………. 39

 AMT9 …………………………………………………. 40

 AMT10 ………………………………………………… 41

 The Prosecution …………………………………. 44

 

Trial of Manstein …………………………………. 45

 

Dachau Trials ………………………………………. 48

 

Trial of Eichmann ……………………………….. 51

 Eichmann the Zionist …………………………. 54

 

Recent German Trials ………………………… 55

 

Italian Trials ……………………………………….. 56

 

Criticism of the Trials …………….………….. 57

 The Charges ………………………………………. 57

 The Court ………………………………………….. 58

 The Defendants …………………………………. 58

 The Hidden Aspect …………………………….. 59

 

APPENDICES

A The Katyn Massacre ……………………….. 59

B Bombing of Civilians ……………………….. 61

C The ‘Repatriations………………………….. 64

D Palestine …………………………………………… 66

Bibliography …………………………………………. 69

 

 

Cover photo shows the funeral pyre set up in a Dresden street of some of the 135,000 civilian victims of Allied bombing of that German city.

© 1978

All Rights Reserved

Printed & published by Historical Review Press, Chapel Ascote, Ladbroke, Southam, – Warks., England

 


 

[NOTES: 

1. These notes and Version History (see below) do not appear in the original book. They are here to explain what is not original to the book and what is additional material. For example the layout is not original, the book is formatted with two columns, while this version has a standard “one column” format.

 

2. This version contains footnotes (the original did not) and additional images, indicated by [Add. Image] that did not appear in the original book.

 

3. Page numbers in square brackets, e.g.  [Page 3] refer to the original book. If a page number falls within a sentence in the original it has been moved to the end or beginning of the sentence, or paragraph.

 

4. The English spelling “Nuremberg” is used throughout the text here, while the original book uses the German spelling.

 

5.  …. ]

 

Version History

Ver 2: Aug 6, 2014 – Added additional images and footnotes to Setting the Scene.

Ver 1: Aug 3, 2014 – Added additional images and footnotes to Introduction and Facts & Figures.

 


 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The execution in 1976 of British and American mercenaries in Angola for ‘war crimes’ has brought back to public attention this peculiar and disturbing subject. [1]

 

During the Angolan trial, the judges intervened at several points to restrain the defence counsel from putting its case too well. The court could not tolerate any evidence which might help the accused criminals, they said.

 

The British press whined hypocritically about this travesty of justice. Yet the simple-minded Angolans were only doing as their European mentors had taught them: the Angolan trial was virtually a carbon-copy of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremburg in 1946. All the ingredients were there: the pretence of justice, the restrictions on the defence, the presumption of guilt before the trial had even started, the supervision of an international tribunal, the hysterical accusations of prosecution witnesses etc., etc. It is easy for the press to complain about the standards of ‘justice’ in a backward and far-off land in darkest Africa. But it is not so easy for them to criticise a series of trials for which we were responsible, at least in part, and which have gone down in history and subsequent protocol agreements, as legal precedent.

 

We are subject to no such restrictions. In this short volume, we hope to examine as thoroughly and objectively as possible the vexed subject of the trials at Nuremburg, and in so doing make some contribution to a rational understanding of this aspect of recent history which has, along with other events, been grotesquely twisted by the enemies of truth. One such example is the allegation that six million Jews were gassed as part of an official extermination programme on the part of the German government of the Hitler era and which formed one of the major charges against the Nazi leaders at Nuremburg.

 

 Nuremberg - Harwood 008

[Add. Image] Aerial view of Nuremberg “Palace of Justice” in Winter 1945-46

 

Nuremberg - Harwood 009

[Add. Image] 1945-46 The Court House – “Palace of Justice”.

 

Nuremberg - Harwood 011

[Add. Image] On guard at the “Palace of Justice”.

 

Footnotes

[1] See PART 1

 

 

 

THE OCCUPATION

 

 

In the early days of the Allied occupation of Germany,  brutality was the order of the day. German prisoners in one PoW camp were deliberately kept on a starvation diet by the commandant. At another camp, Americans “used Nazi torture devices” to make prisoners confess misdeeds, according to Robert Murphy’s Diplomat Among Warriors (Doubleday, 1964). [1]

 

Constantine FitzGibbon’s book Denazification (Michael Joseph, 1969) [2] reveals that:

Being devoted to the free enterprise system, they looted individually. The kitbags of GIs who returned from occupation duty in Germany immediately after the war contained many curious items, and some American officers made small fortunes at this time. They also left a lot of half-American babies behind, for that is another form of loot. All this is quite normal post-war practice and perhaps taught the Germans one of the stern lessons that they had apparently failed to learn after the First World War, namely, that it is excessively foolish to fight a war and lose it.

 

A fairly senior Public Relations Officer attached to a very senior US headquarters informed me in mid-1946 that he had ‘liberated’ $180,000-worth of ‘Nazi’ property. With this loot he proposed to buy himself a TV station in the US.

 

In Brittany in 1944 a GI was arrested for rape, court-martialled and duly sentenced. It was generally agreed among the officers of the court that such behaviour was best postponed until the GIs had crossed the German border.

 

At Le Havre, in March of 1946, I watched my luggage being loaded onto the Liberty Ship that was transporting myself and other American officers home. The temporary longshoremen (dockers Ed.) were SS prisoners. In order to humiliate these arrogant racists, American negro soldiers had been detailed to guard them.

 

Such stories could be, and indeed have been,  endlessly multiplied.

 

(The hyper-race-consciousness of the Americans is rather curious in view of the fact that the war was supposedly fought against ‘racism’. This quote lends even more weight to Julius Streicher’s allegation that he was beaten up by negro American soldiers whilst in jail at Nuremburg.) [3]

 

Nuremberg 003

[Add. Image] Julius Streicher in the dock at Nuremburg

 

Efforts were of course made to prevent fraternisation between the American troops and the German civilians. In June, the military police arrested a thousand offenders and reported them for court martial. This stemmed from a United States directive (JCS 1067) of April 1945, which forbade fraternisation. [4] Most of the ideas in this directive, sent to General Eisenhower from Washington, came (yet again) from Morgenthau. A special study of the widespread infringement of the regulations was made by an officer of the Psychological Warfare Branch of the OSS, Saul K. Padover, an historian and psychologist. The study was later published as a book: Psychologist in Germany (Phoenix House, 1946) [5] , which FitzGibbon describes as,

 

highly emotional, with the standard left-wing views of intellectuals in those days: violently pro-Russian and anti-German.

 

The ordinary GIs could not fathom the logic of the order — or its nomenclature. For as one culprit remarked:

 

I never wanted to treat her like she was my brother.

 

On 12 June 1945, Field Marshal Montgomery partially rescinded the order as far as British troops were concerned, and three months later, when he raised the whole matter at the Allies’ Control Council, it was agreed that the policy should be scrapped in all zones.

 

Nuremberg 005

[Add. Image] General Sir Bernard Montgomery during a press briefing, Normandy, June 12th, 1944.

 

Although this aspect of Morgenthau’s directive ended in failure, most of the instructions were successfully carried out. The directive, which was kept highly secret for months, ordered that numerous categories of industrial plant should be uprooted and moved to Allied countries. What could not be moved was to be destroyed. All courts, schools and universities were to be closed down and not re-opened until their staffs were purged of all Nazi personnel. Persons holding responsible positions in industry, commerce, agriculture, finance, and the media were likewise to be arrested and “assumed to be Nazis in the absence of any evidence to the contrary.” The terms of the directive so shocked the advisers of General Lucius D. Clay, deputy commander in chief for military government, that one of them was despatched to Washington in an effort to get the directive modified. Unsuccessful, the aide finally resigned. When in October, the military government was permitted to make it known, General Clay, himself a hard-liner, flew to Washington to urge modification of its unworkable terms. This too ended in failure.

 

Nuremberg 006

[Add. Image] General Lucius D. Clay in Garmisch-Partenkirchen (1947)

 

At the Potsdam conference in July, 1945, President Truman denied that the controversial Morgenthau Plan for the pastoralisation of Germany was being put into effect. Yet the results of Potsdam were there for all to see. All industry, finance and scientific bodies were to be controlled by the victors. All external assets were to be seized. In addition to the industrial plants in their zone, the Soviets were to receive a bonus of 25% pillaged from the other three zones. In return, they would hand over foodstuffs and commodities looted from their zone. A wave of German suicides followed the Potsdam agreements, more than 2,500 persons taking their lives within four days.

 

Nuremberg 007

[Add. Image] Occupations zones in Germany 1945

 

When the occupation began,  the daily food ration in the American zone was 900 to 1,000 calories, although an extra 200 calorie allowance was made to “persecuted persons” (i.e. Jews). It was reported that more than half the babies born in Berlin in August died of starvation. In November, 1945, Washington decided that food would be sent to Germany to prevent starvation and disorder. The ration was raised to 1,550 calories, but it fell to 1,275 a few months later, but even that was greater than the ration in the British zone: a basic ration of 1,048 calories; just enough to keep an idle man alive. In the French zone, on 1 February 1946, the ration was, in theory, slightly higher at 1,075. The internees at Auschwitz received a higher daily ration than this until very near the end of the war. Despite the higher rations given to Jews in post-war Germany,  a US Senator pointed out that the Jews:

 

do not desire to work, but expect to be cared for, and complain when things are not as well done as they think they should be. It is doubtful that any country would want these people as immigrants.

 

The winter of 1946-47 was one of the coldest in history. Schools were closed down as were three-quarters of the remaining industries in the British and American zones. No coal had been delivered to Germans for heating since October, and Germans were reduced to following carts delivering coal in order to pick up any pieces that fell off. In Berlin two hundred people froze to death on a train.

 

Nuremberg 008

[Image] Emotive photograph of Dachau despatchees on train. When 200 Germans similarly froze to death on a train in 1947 no such photographs were published.

 

Hoover reported at the end of February 1947 that Germany had sunk to a level of existence not known in Europe in a hundred years. He proposed large shipments of potatoes and other foodstuffs in order to stave off famine. He also suggested that the dismantling of non-military factories should stop. The delusion that Germany could be reduced to a pastoral state had to be abandoned, despite Morgenthau. Europe could not recover without Germany. Hoover’s plan was eventually translated into the Marshall Aid plan, but not without opposition from Stout’s Society for the Prevention of World War III (still in existence in 1947) which laid on a national conference to attack the reconstruction plan. Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt, sponsor of many Communist-front organisations, lent her name to the project. Morgenthau himself participated in the conference, as did Albert Einstein and Sumner Welles.

 

Although the food programme got under way quite rapidly, it took a little longer for enthusiasm for the dismantling of German industry to wane. Even as Allied planes were flying bulldozers into Berlin during the Soviet blockade, German plants which could have made them were being destroyed. Britain and France sometimes openly aimed at eliminating competition. Soap factories were destroyed and Britain even blew up the Hamburg harbour installations, in order to hamper future German shipping rivalry. The French helped themselves to large parts of the Black Forest; the timber from this well-known tourist attraction being used for pit-props. The vandalisation of Germany did not stop until 1950.

 

But for more than a decade, up to 3,000,000 German soldiers were held in captivity to work in the mines and forests of Russia. It is estimated that more than one million died. The conditions under which they laboured in France were so harsh as to bring about United States intervention, but nothing could be done about their condition in the Soviet Union. General Clay reported that German prisoners returned by the Soviets needed from three to six months to become fit for work. The public health branch of the military government pointed out that such prisoners averaged sixteen pounds below the minimum for health, and that half were suffering from disease. In 1947, Britain was still using the labour of 350,000 Germans. France still held 300,000 out of the 440,000 who had been turned over to them by the Americans. The Americans had freed all their prisoners by August 1947, and in March, France,  yielding to American pressure, began sending prisoners home at the rate of 20,000 a month. Britain returned the last of its prisoners in July 1948. The Soviets claimed to have returned the last of their military prisoners in 1955. On 22 February 1949 the New York Times reported that of the 800,000 German civilians forcibly taken to the Soviet Union between 1944 and 1949, 400,000 had died and 180,000 were still in captivity.

 

Although the Allies are no longer pillaging Germany of war-loot, West Germany continues to this day to pay financial reparation to Jews and even the State of Israel itself,  which did not come into existence until 1948 — three years after the war ended. These reparations are based on the theory that six million Jews were exterminated by the Nazis — a theory which has been effectively demolished by the French writer Paul Rassinier, Professor A. R. Butz of Northwestern University, Illinois, and many others. East Germany has never paid a penny.

 

____________________________________

 

 

 

Footnotes

 

 

[1]  Robert Daniel Murphy (October 28, 1894 – January 9, 1978) was an American diplomat.

 

Born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Murphy had begun his diplomatic career in 1917 as a member of the American Legation in Bern, Switzerland. Among the several posts he held were Vice-Consul in Zurich and Munich, American Consul in Paris from 1930 to 1936, and chargé d’affaires to the Vichy government. He was also the one-time State Department specialist on France.

 

In February 1941, Murphy played an instrumental role in forging the Murphy-Weygand Agreement, which allowed the United States to export to French North Africa in spite of the British blockade and trade restrictions in place upon the Vichy-governed area.

 

In autumn of 1942, at President Roosevelt’s request, Murphy investigated conditions in French North Africa in preparation for the Allied landings – Operation Torch, the first major Allied ground offensive during World War II. He was appointed the President’s personal representative with the rank of Minister to French North Africa. Murphy made contact with various French army officers in Algiers and recruited them to support the Allies when the invasion of French North Africa came.[citation needed]

 

Prior to the November 8 invasion, Murphy, along with US General Mark Wayne Clark, had worked to gain the important blessing of the anti-British French General Henri Giraud for the attack. This blessing could be deployed if necessary against Governor François Darlan in order to gain his cooperation for the invasion. Darlan’s cooperation was formalised on November 22; the Governor of French North Africa was assassinated little more than a month later.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Daniel_Murphy

 

Nuremberg 009

 

Nuremberg 015

[2]  Constantine Fitzgibbon was born in the United States in 1919. His father, Commander Francis Lee-Dillon FitzGibbon, RN, was Irish, his mother, Georgette Folsom, from Lenox, Mass, USA. His parents divorced when he was very young. He was raised and educated in France before moving to England.  After leaving the college, Fitzgibbon became a Marxist sympathiser. Between 1958 and 1960 he resided at Sacombs Ash in Hertfordshire with the famous cookery writer Theodora Fitzgibbon. His good friend Michael Wharton wrote of their turbulent marriage in his books ‘The Missing Will‘ and ‘A Dubious Codicil’.

 

While translating the “Tear in the Ocean” trilogy by Manès Sperber, Fitzgibbon abandoned Communism and became a political conservative. He married his wife Marjorie (née Steele) in 1967. He had one daughter, named Oonagh, born 6 February 1968 for whom he wrote the book Teddy in the Tree in 1977. By a previous marriage to Marion (née Gutmann) he had a son, Francis, born 1961. He was half-brother of Louis Fitzgibbon, author of Katyn. The family resided in Killiney in south County Dublin.

 

Education

 

As a teenager, Fitzgibbon was educated at Wellington College, Berkshire which he detested. He also studied at the University of Munich and University of Paris. Fitzgibbon attended Exeter College, Oxford with a modern languages scholarship but left without a degree just before the outbreak of World War II in 1939.

 

Career

 

Fitzgibbon served in the British Army, in the Oxford and Bucks Light Infantry, from 1939 to 1942, before transferring to the United States Army as a staff officer in military intelligence from 1942-46. He worked as a schoolmaster for a short time in Bermuda from 1946–47,[3] at Saltus Grammar School, then as an independent writer. It was here he wrote his first two novels. He lived in Italy and spent many years in England before moving to Ireland in 1965.

 

Fitzgibbon wrote a number of books, including nine novels. One of the recurring subjects in his work was Nazi Germany.

 

Politically, Fitzgibbon identified himself as a strong anti-Communist. Fitzgibbon’s novel When the Kissing Had to Stop (1963) caused some controversy because of its “anti-CND theme”; the book depicted the Soviet domination of Britain after the country removed its nuclear weapons. An ITV adaptation of When the Kissing Had to Stop caused even more controversy, and one writer called Fitzgibbon a “fascist Hyena”. Fitzgibbon responded by writing a series of essays called Random Thoughts of a Fascist Hyena.

 

FitzGibbon said he was offered, but refused, a job with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) when it was created following World War II. His play, The Devil at Work was produced by the Abbey Theatre in 1971; it was poorly received.

 

FitzGibbon was a member of the Council of the Irish Academy of Letters and an honorary fellow of the Royal Society of Literature and a Guggenheim Fellow. He later became an Irish citizen and lived in County Dublin.

 

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_Fitzgibbon

 

 Nuremberg 010

 

Nuremberg 011

 

Nuremberg 013

 

 

[3]  The Torture of Julius Streicher

 

Source: http://vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/5/1/Stimely106-119.html

 

A DOCUMENTARY EXPOSE

 

This is Purim Fest 1946!” was Julius Streicher’s apt comment before he was sucked down into death via a gallows trap-door in the Nuremberg Prison gymnasium on 16 October 1946. He was the seventh of ten International Military Tribunal defendants hanged that day in fulfillment of the sentences imposed. (Hermann Göring had cheated the hangman the night before with a cyanide capsule, a final gesture of contempt.) It was certainly a travesty that any of the 22 original defendants should have been put on “trial” before, let alone condemned by, such a collection of raving Western idiots and cynical Soviet criminals as constituted the IMT. But the case of Julius Streicher, former National Socialist Gauleiter of Franconia, editor and publisher of Der Stürmer, was especially ludicrous. He was unique among the convicted defendants in that he was tried not for anything he was alleged to have done, or ordered, or acquiesced in, but for what he had thought and written. In his case the Allied prosecutors made few bones about it — there was no attempt to dress up the indictment by accusing him of actual participation in or even knowledge of any “crimes against peace” or “war crimes.” (They knew that this would have been rather difficult, given that Streicher had held no official post since February 1940, and had been out of favor and devoid of official influence since long before that time.) He was charged under Counts One and Four of the Indictment: “common plan or conspiracy to wage aggressive war,” and “crimes against humanity.” No real attempt was made to nail him on the first count, and he was acquitted. On the other count he was convicted and condemned to death. As Germany’s world-famed Jew-baiter numero uno, Streicher was to be made an example of on this Point — essentially on the point of being a vociferous anti-semite. The tribunal’s final judgement was that:

 

…. Streicher’s incitement of murder and extermination at the time when Jews in the East were being killed under the most horrible conditions clearly constitutes persecution on political and racial grounds in connection with war crimes as defined by the Charter, and constitutes a crime against humanity.

 

The attempts made during the proceedings to prove that Streicher has at least known about the alleged extermination program were not very successful, based as they were on the issue whether Streicher had read claims of extermination in foreign Jewish newspapers; Streicher did admit this — he was aware of foreign allegations. (It is instructive that the prosecution had to base its claim of Streicher’s “knowing” on such a thing, rather than on anything coming to him from the Reich government itself, or from anywhere within the Reich.) In the event, the final judgment against Streicher was not on the question of such “knowledge” of murder but purely on the question of alleged incitement to murder, via his pre-war speeches and his writings throughout the years in Der Stürmer. Not Göring, not Ribbentrop, not Rosenberg, nor Sauckel, Frank, Jodi, Keitel — not any of the other convicted defendants* were put on trial for merely their dissemination of views on a social-political issue. They were all in the dock because of things they had allegedly done or been directly involved in which the IMT determined to have been violations of its interpretation, as codified in its charter, of “International Law.” Streicher joined them in the dock and on the gallows because of what he thought, and because he said publicly what he thought. There was not even any real attempt to obscure this fact within legal mumbo-jumbo. Nor was the IMT concerned with the fact that Streicher’s “incitement” happened to violate no law — not in Germany nor, for that matter, in any of the Allied countries. This was some trial.

 

But Streicher’s case was unique in another way also. He was the only IMT defendant to have been systematically, physically tortured while under Allied custody awaiting trial. Some of the other defendants did have complaints about various aspects of their treatment since arrest (Hans Frank mentioned being beaten up once by American negroes), in particular the humiliating, pettily-harassing conditions of their cell-life — but none made a claim to having been treated as horrendously as Streicher described. These were after all the “Major War Criminals,” the “first string” Nazis upon whom the spotlight of world attention was to glare at Nuremberg; claims of torture would have been most embarrassing to the Allies, who were bragging about how just and fair and legally high-minded they were behaving toward their captives. When Streicher brought up during the IMT proceedings his claim of having been tortured, it was clear that the prosecution was surprised and at something of a loss. The claim was stricken from the official record; otherwise an investigation would have been required.

 

What Streicher had vainly tried to relate on the record were his experiences shortly after his arrest, before he had been brought to Mondorf in Luxembourg, the “holding center” for the IMT defendants before the trial began. His torture was not sanctioned by the IMT or, apparently, any high authorities. His reputation had preceded him: it was a simple case of low-level revenge and sadism.

 

Streicher and his wife were arrested on 22 May 1945 in the village of Weidring (Waidring), just southwest of Berchtesgaden. He was first taken to Berchiesgaden, then passed through Salzburg and Munich before winding up at Freising, northwest of Munich, where he stayed three days before being transferred to Wiesbaden. After one day there he was taken to Mondorf, where he remained until finally being taken to Nuremberg in late August. **

 

It was between Berchtesgaden and Wiesbaden, particularly in Freising, that Streicher was tortured in direct violation of the Geneva Convention. (At this time he was not even indicted or accused of a crime.) Historian Werner Maser devoted two pages to this in his 1977 book Nuremberg: Tribunal der Sieger (the 1979 American edition of which suffered a strange, toned-down metamorphosis in title: Nuremberg: A Nation on Trial). Maser’s source, which he quoted chillingly in full, was a manuscript account by Streicher describing the most unspeakable tortures and degradations inflicted upon him by U.S. Army negroes and Jews. The manuscript was written for Streicher’s lawyer, Dr. Hanns Marx, and is now in Maser’s possession. Maser accepted the truth of this account, commenting that:

 

. . . For two decades Streicher had reviled, slandered and insulted world Jewry, had offered them up to racial fanatics as vermin; so. eighteen months before his execution by hanging, he found himself with a personal account to square; the “holy wrath” of his victims led them to apply the Old Testament law of “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.

 

Streicher’s biographer William P. Varga, in his 1981 book The Number One Nazi Jew-Baiter (actually a fairly serious work, despite the comic-book title) mentions the allegation of torture at Freising:

 

[U.S. Army Intelligence Captain John) Dolibois later related that Streicher complained bitterly of his treatment at the hands of American soldiers before his transfer to Mondorf. Evidently his notoriety as a fanatic racial persecutor was known to the troops at Freising. Streicher claimed that he and his wife were forced by some black American soldiers to walk in public stripped of their clothes. These soldiers allegedly spat on them and extinguished cigarettes on their bare skin. At Mondorf, an unconfirmed report was circulated stating that some soldiers had taken photographs that showed Streicher dressed only in an open coat, with swollen testicles and a crown of thorns on his head with a sign draped over his neck with the words “Julius Streicher, King of the Jews.

 

However, Varga goes on to describe “most of Streicher’s complaints” of such treatment as “extremely questionable”; they were “apparently fabricated.” The only basis he presents for this skepticism is a letter written by Streicher at Mondorf in June 1945 to former Stürmer colleagues, in which are mentioned “only” his uncomfortable handcuffs, and his having been forced to stamp out cigarettes with bare feet. For biographer Varga, this constitutes evidence that Streicher “fabricated” other stories. He does not seem to have considered that in writing this particular letter, Streicher may have suffered under constraints as mundane as time or as special as censorship. His argument against Streicher’s veracity here is rather obviously a grasp at the only straw — and a very thin one — available. Varga in 1981 was apparently unaware of the lengthy, detailed Streicher statement published by Maser in 1977. (Maser’s book is not listed in his bibliography.) That Streicher made a point in this statement of mentioning who had treated him well in addition to who had treated him badly, delineating clearly between these types and their actions with details as to time, place, and names where he knew them, would seem to auger the truth of what it contains.

 

The acceptance of the statement as a genuine, honest record by Werner Maser — a respected historian hardly partial to National Socialism, much less to the Julius Streicher variety — is unquestionably well-founded.

 

It is not the only piece of evidence extant. In the Fall of 1982 another document surfaced which sheds more light on the torture of Julius Streicher. It is a seven-page, handwritten statement given by Streicher at Mondorf to an American officer, who requested it after hearing Streicher’s verbal complaints. In that officer’s hands for 37 years, never published or cited, the document was sold at auction by the Charles Hamilton Autograph Gallery in New York City in October 1982, for the price of $1,200. The Journal of Historical Review was able to obtain a copy of this historically significant document. It is published on the following pages for the first time, in English translation and followed by photographs of the handwritten original. Also reproduced is a letter from the officer to the auctioneer describing the circumstances under which he obtained the document.

 

A comparison of this document with that presented by Maser in his book shows the consistency in events described. Its publication at last adds to our knowledge of a particularly shameful postwar episode.

 

– Keith Stimely

 

*Hans Fritzsche, the National Socialist radio personality stuck into the Nuremberg proceedings as a poor man’s substitute for Joseph Goebbels, who was a corpse, was like Streicher basically accused of “incitement” to crimes. He was acquitted.

 

** It was at Mondorf that Streicher composed his autobiographical political testament, a manuscript of some 15,000 words. It was published as “Das Politische Testament,” edited and with a foreword by Jay. W. Baird, in Vierteljahrshefte fuer Zeitgeschichte (April 1978).

 

Translation

 

On 22 May [1945) I was arrested in Waidring (Tirol) and was brought into the jail at Salzburg. There my hands were put into handcuffs by a Jewish police-officer.

 

On 23 May, I was brought to Freising, via Toelz and Munich. During the 200 Kilometer trip in considerable cold, I was only dressed with shirt and pants, since my jacket was not given to me. My hands were handcuffed.

 

In Freising I was put in a cell, where there was no possibility of sitting or lying down. The window was removed and the cell was cold. During my three days stay in there (23 May afternoon to 26 May afternoon) I was subjected to the following treatment:

 

1) After being stripped of my clothes, two Negroes tore my shirt into two pieces. Dressed only with my underpants, and barefoot, I spent three days in the cold room. During the night and during a few hours in daytime, I was handed an old military coat. It was taken away immediately, whenever I tried to resist the tortures.

2) Two or three times daily I had to stand against a wall, with my handcuffed hands held above the head, whereupon a Negro or the police-officer kept hitting me on my genitalia, with a leather whip up to a minute long. Whenever I made a resisting move with my handcuffed hands, I received a hit with the foot in my testicles. My testicles and genitalia were badly swollen.

3) Two or three times daily I had to open my mouth, whereupon the white police-officer or the Negroes spat into it. If I kept my mouth closed, it was forcefully opened with a wooden stick.

4) When I refused to drink from the piss-bowl in the toilet, I was hit with the whip.

5) On each of his visits to my cell, the white police-officer pulled hair from my nipples and eyebrows.

6) During the three days I received no nourishment, and only once I was allowed to drink water in the toilet. When I refused to take and to eat partially decayed leftovers from a cardboard box, I was pushed to the ground, a heavy iron chain was put on my back and I was forced to kiss the feet of the Negroes.

7) At the end of each torture, I had to put out with my bare feet burning cigarette butts, thrown on the ground.

8) I was repeatedly photographed by people of the press, while wearing underpants and my genitalia were visible. The photographers were Jews.

9) On the last day, two hours before being transported to Wiesbaden, a Negro said: now comes “kill, kill” and made the corresponding gesture at the throat. He asked me what I wanted to eat or drink, I may wish. I asked for paper in order to write a letter to my wife.

10) Before being transported, a Negro called me into the toilet, then threw my civilian clothes in and ordered me to get dressed. This I had to do with handcuffed hands.

 

On 26 May, I was brought to Wiesbaden in handcuffs, where I arrived in the early hours of 27 May. Only in Wiesbaden, the handcuffs which I had on since 22 May (five days) day and night were removed from my greatly swollen hands and infected joints. Since then I am under medical care. The officer in charge of the jail in Wiesbaden (he said he was a Jew) acted correctly.

[signed]

Julius Streicher

16.6.45

 

Source: Reprinted from The Journal of Historical Review, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 106-119.

 

Nuremberg 016

 

 

[4] Directive to the Commander in Chief of the U.S. Occupation Forces (JCS 1067) (April 1945)

 

Directive JCS 1067 to the Commander in Chief of U.S. forces in Germany (April 1945) laid out the main features of American occupation policy in the postwar period. Its numerous tough regulations remained officially in force until the middle of 1947. According to this directive, Germany was to be treated as an enemy state – one that needed to be permanently prevented from becoming a renewed threat to peace. “Fraternization” between the American occupation forces and Germans was prohibited. Denazification was to be achieved through the dissolution of all Nazi organizations and the exclusion of their members from public life and higher positions in the economic sector. A new start to political life was only possible with American permission, and the reopening of educational institutions was to take place under strict control. Likewise, economic life was to be revived in accordance with strict directives. The economy was to be decentralized and controlled with the help of German agencies. The German economy was to produce only enough to provision the occupation troops and to provide a basic livelihood for the population. A more robust economic recovery was not desirable. The standard of living in the American zone was not to exceed that in neighboring countries.

 

Source: http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=2297

 

——————-

 

Directive to Commander-in-Chief of United States Forces of Occupation Regarding the Military Government of Germany; April 1945 (JCS 1067)

 

Source: http://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/ga3-450426.pdf

 

It is considered appropriate, at the time of the release to the American public of the following directive setting forth United States policy with reference to the military government of Germany, to preface the directive with a short statement of the circumstances surrounding the issuance of the directive to General Eisenhower.

 

The directive was issued originally in April 1945, and was intended to serve two purposes. It was to guide General Eisenhower in the military government of that portion of Germany occupied by United States forces. At the same time he was directed to urge the Control Council to adopt these policies for enforcement throughout Germany.

 

Before this directive was discussed in the Control Council, President Truman, Prime Minister Attlee, and Generalissimo Stalin met at Potsdam and issued a communiqué setting forth agreed policies for the control of Germany. This communiqué was made public on August 2, 1945. The directive, therefore, should be read in the light of the policies enumerated at Potsdam. In particular, its provisions regarding disarmament, economic and financial matters, and reparations should be read together with the similar provisions set out in the Potsdam agreement on the treatment of Germany in the initial control period and in the agreement on reparations contained in the Potsdam communiqué. Many of the policy statements contained in the directive have been in substance adopted by the Potsdam agreement. Some policy statements in the Potsdam agreement differ from the policy statements on the same subjects in the directive. In such cases, the policies of the Potsdam agreement are controlling. Where the Potsdam agreement is silent on matters of policy dealt with in the directive, the latter continues to guide General Eisenhower in his administration of the United States Zone in Germany.

 

Directive to Commander-in-Chief of United States Forces of Occupation Regarding the Military Government of Germany

 

 

1. The Purpose and Scope of this Directive:

 

This directive is issued to you as Commanding General of the United States forces of occupation in Germany. As such you will serve as United States member of the Control Council and will also be responsible for the administration of military government in the zone or zones assigned to the United States for purposes of occupation and administration. It outlines the basic policies which will guide you in those two capacities after the termination of the combined command of the Supreme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Force.

 

This directive sets forth policies relating to Germany in the initial post-defeat period. As such it is not intended to be an ultimate statement of policies of this Government concerning the treatment of Germany in the post-war world. It is therefore essential that, during the period covered by this directive, you assure that surveys are constantly maintained of economic, industrial financial, social and political conditions within your zone and that the results of such surveys and such other surveys as may be made in other zones are made available to your Government, through the Joint Chiefs of Staff. These surveys should be developed in such manner as to serve as a basis for determining changes in the measures of control set forth herein as well as for the progressive formulation and development of policies to promote the basic objectives of the United States. Supplemental directives will be issued to you by the Joint Chiefs of Staff as may be required.

 

As a member of the Control Council you will urge the adoption by the other occupying powers of the principles and policies set forth in this directive and, pending Control Council agreement, you will follow them in your zone. It is anticipated that substantially similar directives will be issued to the Commanders in Chief of the U.K., U.S.S.R. and French forces of occupation.

 

 

PART I General and Political

 

2. The Basis of Military Government:

a. The rights, power and status of the military government in Germany are based upon the unconditional surrender or total defeat of Germany.

b. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 3 below, you are, by virtue of your position, clothed with supreme legislative, executive, and judicial authority in the areas occupied by forces under your

command. This authority will be broadly construed and includes authority to take all measures deemed by you necessary, appropriate or desirable in relation to military exigencies and the objectives of a firm military government.

c. You will issue a proclamation continuing in force such proclamations, orders and instructions as may have heretofore been issued by Allied Commanders in your zone, subject to such changes as you may determine. Authorizations of action by the Supreme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Force, may be considered as applicable to you unless inconsistent with this or later directives.

 

 

3. The Control Council and Zones of Occupation:

a. The four Commanders-in-Chief, acting jointly, will constitute the Control Council in Germany which will be the supreme organ of control over Germany in accordance with the agreement on Control Machinery in Germany. For purposes of administration of military government, Germany has been divided into four zones of occupation.

b. The authority of the Control Council to formulate policy and procedures and administrative relationships with respect to matters affecting Germany as a whole will be paramount throughout Germany. You will carry out and support in your zone the policies agreed upon in the Control Council. In the absence of such agreed policies you- will act in accordance with this and other directives of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

c. The administration of affairs in Germany shall be directed towards the decentralization of the political and administrative structure and the development of local responsibility. To this end you will encourage autonomy in regional, local and municipal agencies of German administration. The German economic structure shall also be decentralized. The Control Council may, however, to the minimum extent required for the fulfillment of purposes set forth herein, permit centralized administration or establish central control of:

(a) essential national public services such as railroads, communications and power,

(b) finance and foreign affairs, and

(c) production and distribution of essential commodities.

d. The Control Council should adopt procedures to effectuate, and you will facilitate in your zone, the equitable distribution of essential commodities between the zones. In the absence of a conflicting policy of the Control Council, you may deal directly with one or more zone commanders on matters of special concern to such zones.

e. Pending the formulation in the Control Council of uniform policies and procedures with respect to inter-zonal travel and movement of civilians, no civilians shall be permitted to leave or enter your zone without your authority, and no Germans within your zone shall be permitted to leave Germany except for specific purposes approved by you.

f. The military government personnel in each zone, including those dealing with regional and local branches of the departments of any central German administrative machinery, shall be selected by authority of the Commander of that zone except that liaison officers may be furnished by the Commanders of the other three zones. The respective Commanders-in-Chief shall have exclusive jurisdiction throughout the whole of Germany over the members of the armed forces under their command and over the civilians who accompany them.

g. The Control Council should be responsible for facilitating the severance of all governmental and administrative connections between Austria and Germany and the elimination of German economic influences in Austria. Every assistance should be given to the Allied Administration in Austria in its efforts to effectuate these purposes.

 

 

4. Basic Objectives of Military Government in Germany:

a. It should be brought home to the Germans that Germany’s ruthless warfare and the fanatical Nazi resistance have destroyed the German economy and made chaos and suffering inevitable and that the Germans cannot escape responsibility for what they have brought upon themselves.

b. Germany will not be occupied for the purpose of liberation but as a defeated enemy nation. Your aim is not oppression but to occupy Germany for the purpose of realizing certain important Allied objectives. In the conduct of your occupation and administration you should be just but firm and aloof. You will strongly discourage fraternization with the German officials and population.

c. The principal Allied objective is to prevent Germany from ever again becoming a threat to the peace of the world. Essential steps in the accomplishment of this objective are the elimination of

Nazism and militarism in all their forms, the immediate apprehension of war criminals for punishment, the industrial disarmament and demilitarization of Germany, with continuing control over Germany’s capacity to make war, and the preparation for an eventual reconstruction of German political life on a democratic basis.

d. Other Allied objectives are to enforce the program of reparations and restitution, to provide relief for the benefit of countries devastated by Nazi aggression, and to ensure that prisoners of war and displaced persons of the United Nations are cared for and repatriated.

 

5. Economic Controls:

a. As a member of the Control Council and as zone commander, you will be guided by the principle that controls upon the German economy may be imposed to the extent that such controls may be necessary to achieve the objectives enumerated in paragraph 4 above and also as they may be essential to protect the safety and meet the needs of the occupying forces and assure the production and maintenance of goods and services required to prevent starvation or such disease and unrest as would endanger these forces. No action will be taken in execution of the reparations program or otherwise which would tend to support basic living conditions in Germany or in your zone on a higher level than that existing in any one of the neighboring United Nations.

b. In the imposition and maintenance of such controls as may be prescribed by you or the Control Council, German authorities will to the fullest extent practicable be ordered to proclaim and assume administration of such controls. Thus it should be brought home to the German people that the responsibility for the administration of such controls and for any break-downs in those controls will rest with themselves and German authorities.

 

 

6. Denazification:

a. A Proclamation dissolving the Nazi Party, its formations, affiliated associations and supervised organizations, and all Nazi public institutions which were set up as instruments of Party domination, and prohibiting their revival in any form, should be promulgated by the Control Council. You will assure the prompt effectuation of that policy in your zone and will make every effort to prevent the reconstitution of any such organization in underground, disguised or secret form. Responsibility for continuing desirable non-political social services of dissolved Party organizations may be transferred by the Control Council to appropriate central agencies and by you to appropriate local agencies.

b. The laws purporting to establish the political structure of National Socialism and the basis of the Hitler regime and all laws, decrees and regulations which establish discriminations on grounds of race, nationality, creed or political opinions should be abrogated by the Control Council. You will render them inoperative in your zone.

c. All members of the Nazi party who have been more than nominal participants in its activities, all active supporters of Nazism or militarism and all other persons hostile to Allied purposes will be removed and excluded from public office and from positions of importance in quasi-public and private enterprises such as:

(1) civic, economic and labor organizations,

(2) corporations and other organizations in which the German government or subdivisions have a major financial interest,

(3) industry, commerce, agriculture, and finance,

(4) education, and

(5) the press, publishing houses and other agencies disseminating news and propaganda. Persons are to be treated as more than nominal participants in Party activities and as active supporters of Nazism or militarism when they have:

(1) held office or otherwise been active at any level from local to national in the party and its subordinate organizations, or in organizations which further militaristic doctrines,

(2) authorized or participated affirmatively in any Nazi crimes, racial persecutions or discriminations,

(3) been avowed believers in Nazism or racial and militaristic creeds, or

(4) voluntarily given substantial moral or material support or political assistance of any kind to the Nazi Party or Nazi officials and leaders. No such persons shall be retained in any of the categories of employment listed above because of administrative necessity, convenience or expediency.

d. Property, real and personal, owned or controlled by the Nazi party, its formations, affiliated associations and supervised organizations, and by all persons subject to arrest under the provisions of paragraph 8, and found within your zone, will be taken under your control pending a decision by the Control Council or higher authority as to its eventual disposition.

e. All archives, monuments and museums of Nazi inception, or which are devoted to the perpetuation of German militarism, will be taken under your control and their properties held pending decision as to their disposition by the Control Council.

f. You will make special efforts to preserve from destruction and take under your control records, plans, books, documents, papers, files, and scientific, industrial and other information and data belonging to or controlled by the following:

(1) The Central German Government and its subdivisions, German military organizations, organizations engaged in military research, and such other governmental agencies as may be deemed advisable;

(2) The Nazi Party, its formations, affiliated associations and supervised organizations;

(3) All police organizations, including security and political police;

(4) Important economic organizations and industrial establishments including those controlled by the Nazi Party or its personnel;

(5) Institutes and special bureaus devoting themselves to racial, political, militaristic or similar research or propaganda.

 

 

7. Demilitarization:

a. In your zone you will assure that all units of the German armed forces, including pare-military organizations, are dissolved as such, and that their personnel are promptly disarmed and controlled. Prior to their final disposition, you will arrest and hold all military personnel who are included under the provisions of paragraph 8.

b. The Control Council should proclaim, and in your zone you will effectuate, the total dissolution of all military and pare-military organizations, including the General Staff, the German Officers Corps, the Reserve Corps and military academies, together with all associations which might serve to keep alive the military tradition in Germany.

c. You will seize or destroy all arms, ammunition and implements of war and stop the production thereof.

d. You will take proper steps to destroy the German war potential, as set forth elsewhere in this directive.

 

8. Suspected War Criminals and Security Arrests:

a. You will search out, arrest, and hold, pending receipt by you of further instructions as to their disposition, Adolf Hitler, his chief Nazi associates, other war criminals and all persons who have participated in planning or carrying out Nazi enterprises involving or resulting in atrocities or war crimes.

b. All persons who, if permitted to remain at large would endanger the accomplishment of your objectives will also be arrested and held in custody until trial by an appropriate semi-judicial body to be established by you. The following is a partial list of the categories of persons to be arrested in order to carry out this policy:

[NOTE: There follows at this point in the directive a detailed list of categories of Nazi war criminals and others who are to be arrested. Some of these have not yet been found. It is considered that to publish the categories at this time would put the individuals concerned on notice and would interfere with their apprehension and punishment, where appropriate. The list of categories is, therefore, withheld from publication for the present.]

If in the light of conditions which you encounter in Germany, you believe that it is not immediately feasible to subject certain persons within these categories to this treatment, you should report your reasons and recommendations to your government through the Joint Chiefs of Staff. If you believe it desirable, you may postpone the arrest of those whose cases you have reported, pending a decision communicated to you by the J.C.S. In no event shall any differentiation be made between or special consideration be accorded to persons arrested, either as to manner of arrest or conditions of detention, upon the basis of wealth or political, industrial, or other rank or position. In your discretion you may make such exceptions as you deem advisable for intelligence or other military reasons.

 

 

9. Political Activities:

a. No political activities of any kind shall be countenanced unless authorized by you. You will assure that your military government does not become committed to any political group.

b. You will prohibit the propagation in any form of Nazi, militaristic or pan-German doctrines.

c. No German parades, military or political, civilian or sports, shall be permitted by you.

d. To the extent that military interests are not prejudiced and subject to the provisions of the three preceding subparagraphs and of paragraph 10, freedom of speech, press and religious worship will be permitted. Consistent with military necessity, all religious institutions will be respected.

 

 

10. Public Relations and Control of Public Information:

As a member of the Control Council, you will endeavor to obtain agreement for uniform or coordinated policies with respect to:

(a) control of public information media in Germany,

(b) accrediting of foreign correspondents,

(c) press censorship, and

(d) issuance of official news communiqués dealing with Control Council matters. United States policies in these matters will be sent to you separately and you will be guided by these in your negotiations on the Control Council.

 

 

11. German Courts:

a. All extraordinary courts, including the Volksgerichtshof (People’s Court) and the Sondergerichte (Special Courts), and all courts and tribunals of the Nazi Party and of its formations, affiliated associations and supervised organizations will be abolished immediately.

b. All ordinary criminal, civil and administrative courts, except those previously re-established by order of the military government, will be closed. After the elimination of all Nazi features and personnel you will permit those which are to exercise jurisdiction within the boundaries of your zone to resume operations under such regulations, supervision and control as you may consider appropriate. Courts which are to exercise jurisdiction over territory extending beyond the boundaries of your zone will be reopened only with the express authorization of the Control Council and under its regulation, supervision and control. The power to review and veto decisions of German courts shall be included within the power of supervision and control.

 

 

12. Police:

With the exception of the Reichshriminalpolizei (Criminal Police) all elements of the Sicherheitspolizei (Security Police), e.g., Geheimestaatspolizei (Gestapo), and the Sicherheitsdienst der S.S. will be abolished. Criminal and ordinary police will be purged of Nazi personnel and utilized under the control and supervision of the military government.

 

 

13. Political Prisoners:

Subject to military security and the interests of the individuals concerned, you will release all persons found within your zone who have been detained or placed in custody on grounds of race, nationality, creed or political opinions and treat them as displaced persons. You should make provision for the review of convictions of alleged criminal offenses about which there may be substantial suspicion of racial, religious or political persecution, and in which sentences of imprisonment have not been fully served by persons imprisoned within your zone.

 

 

14. Education:

a. All educational institutions within your zone except those previously re-established by Allied authority will be closed. The closure of Nazi educational institutions such as Adolf Hitler Schulen, Napolas and Ordensburgen and of Nazi organizations within other educational institutions will be permanent.

b. A coordinated system of control over German education and an affirmative program of reorientation will be established designed completely to eliminate Nazi and militaristic doctrines and to encourage the development of democratic ideas.

c. You will permit the reopening of elementary (Volksschulen), middle (Mittelschulen) and vocational (Berufsschulen) schools at the earliest possible date after Nazi personnel has been

eliminated. Textbooks and curricula which are not free of Nazi and militaristic doctrine shall not be used The Control Council should devise programs looking toward the reopening of secondary schools, universities and other institutions of higher learning. After Nazi features and personnel have been eliminated and pending the formulation of such programs by the Control Council, you may formulate and put into effect an interim program within your zone and in any case may permit the reopening of such institutions and departments which offer training which you consider immediately essential or useful in the administration of military government and the purposes of the occupation.

d. It is not intended that the military government will intervene in questions concerning denominational control of German schools, or in religious instruction in German schools, except insofar as may be necessary to insure that religious instruction and administration of such schools conform to such Allied regulations as are or may be established pertaining to purging of personnel and curricula.

 

 

15. Arts and Archives:

Subject to the provisions of paragraph 6 above, you will make all reasonable efforts to preserve historical archives, museums, libraries and works of art.

 

 

 

PART II Economic General Objectives and Methods of Control

 

16. You will assure that the German economy is administered and controlled in such a way as to accomplish the basic objectives set forth in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this Directive. Economic controls will be imposed only to the extent necessary to accomplish these objectives, provided that you will impose controls to the full extent necessary to achieve the industrial disarmament of Germany. Except as may be necessary to carry out these objectives, you will take no steps (a) looking toward the economic rehabilitation of Germany, or (b) designed to maintain or strengthen the German economy.

 

17. To the maximum extent possible without jeopardizing the successful execution of measures required to implement the objectives outlined in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive you will use German authorities and agencies and subject them to such supervision and punishment for non-compliance as is necessary to ensure that they carry out their tasks.

For this purpose you will give appropriate authority to any German agencies and administrative services you consider essential; provided, however, that you will at all times adhere strictly to the provisions of this directive regarding denazification and dissolution or elimination of Nazi organizations, institutions, principles, features, and practices.

To the extent necessary you will establish administrative machinery, not dependent upon German authorities and agencies, to execute or assure the execution of the provisions of paragraphs 19, 20, 30, 31, 32, 39 and 40 and any other measures necessary to an accomplishment of your industrial disarmament objectives.

 

18. In order to decentralize the structure and administration of the German economy to the maximum possible extent, you will:

a. ensure that the action required to maintain or restore essential public utilities and industrial and agricultural activities is taken as far as possible on a local and regional basis;

b. on no account propose or approve in the Control Council the establishment of centralized administration of controls over the German economy except where such centralization of administration is clearly essential to the fulfillment of the objectives listed in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive. Decentralization in administration should not be permitted to interfere with attainment of the largest practicable measure of agreement on economic policies in the Control Council

 

19. You will institute or assure the maintenance of such statistical records and reports as may be necessary in carrying out the objectives listed in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive.

 

20. You will initiate appropriate surveys which may assist you in achieving the objectives of the occupation. In particular you will promptly undertake surveys of supplies, equipment and resources in your zone. You will endeavor to obtain prompt agreement in the Control Council to the making of similar surveys in the other zones of occupation, and you will urge appropriate steps to coordinate the methods and results of these and other future surveys conducted in the various zones. You will keep the

Control Council, United States Representative on the Reparation Commission and other appropriate authorities, currently apprised of the information obtained by means of intermediate reports or otherwise.

 

 

German Standard of Living

 

21. You will estimate requirements of supplies necessary to prevent starvation or widespread disease or such civil unrest as would endanger the occupying forces. Such estimates will be based upon a program whereby the Germans are made responsible for providing for themselves, out of their own work and resources. You will take all practicable economic and police measures to assure that German resources are fully utilized and consumption held to the minimum in order that imports may be strictly limited and that surpluses may be made available for the occupying forces and displaced persons and United Nations prisoners of war, and for reparation. You will take no action that would tend to support basic living standards in Germany on a higher level than that existing in any one of the neighboring United Nations and you will take appropriate measures to ensure that basic living standards of the German people are not higher than those existing in any one of the neighboring United Nations when such measures will contribute to raising the standards of any such nation.

 

22. You will urge upon the Control Council that uniform ration scales be applied throughout Germany, that essential items be distributed equitably among the zones, that net surpluses be made available for export to Allied countries, and that imports be limited to the net deficits of Germany as a whole.

 

 

Labor, Health, and Social Insurance

 

23. You will permit the self-organization of employees along democratic lines, subject to such safeguards as may be necessary to prevent the perpetuation of Nazi or militarist influence under any guise or the continuation of any group hostile to the objectives and operations of the occupying forces.

 

24. You will permit free collective bargaining between employees and employers regarding wage, hour and working conditions and the establishment of machinery for the settlement of industrial disputes. Collective bargaining shall be subject to such wage, hour and other controls, if any, as may be instituted or revived by your direction.

 

25. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 48 of this directive you are authorized to direct German authorities to maintain or reestablish nondiscriminatory systems of social insurance and poor relief.

 

26. You are authorized to direct the German authorities to maintain or re-establish such health services and facilities as may be available to them.

 

 

Agriculture, Industry and Internal Commerce

 

27. You will require the Germans to use all means at their disposal to maximize agricultural output and to establish as rapidly as possible effective machinery for the collection and distribution of agricultural output.

 

28. You will direct the German authorities to utilize large-landed estates and public lands in a manner which will facilitate the accommodation and settlement of Germans and others or increase agricultural output.

 

29. You will protect from destruction by the Germans, and maintain for such disposition as is determined by this and other directives or by the Control Council, all plants, equipment, patents and other property, and all books and records of large German industrial companies and trade and research associations that have been essential to the German war effort or the German economy. You will pay particular attention to research and experimental establishments of such concerns.

 

30. In order to disarm Germany, the Control Council should:

a. prevent the production, acquisition by importation or otherwise, and development of all arms, ammunition and implements of war, as well as all types of aircraft, and all parts, components and ingredients specially designed or produced for incorporation therein;

b. prevent the production of merchant ships, synthetic rubber and oil, aluminum and magnesium and any other products and equipment on which you will subsequently receive instructions;

c. seize and safeguard all facilities used in the production of any of the items mentioned in this paragraph and dispose of them as follows:

(1) remove all those required for reparation;

(2) destroy all those not transferred for reparation if they are especially adapted to the production of the items specified in this paragraph and are not of a type generally used in industries permitted to the Germans (cases of doubt to be resolved in favor of destruction);

(3) hold the balance for disposal in accordance with instructions which will be sent to you.

Pending agreement in the Control Council you will take these measures in your own zone. You will not postpone enforcement of the prohibitions contained in subparagraphs a and b and the instructions in subparagraph c without specific approval of your government through the Joint Chiefs of Staff except that, in your discretion, you may permit the production of synthetic rubber and oil, aluminum and magnesium, to the minimum extent necessary to meet the purposes stated in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the directive pending action by the Joint Chiefs of Staff upon such recommendation for postponement as you may make.

 

31. As an additional measure of disarmament, the Control Council should:

a. prohibit initially all research activities and close all laboratories, research institutions and similar technical organizations except those considered necessary to the protection of public health;

b. abolish all those laboratories and related institutions whose-work has been connected with the building of the German war machine, safeguard initially such laboratories and detain such personnel as are of interest to your technological investigations, and thereafter remove or destroy their equipment;

c. permit the resumption of scientific research in specific cases, only after careful investigation has established that the contemplated research will in no way contribute to Germany’s future war potential and only under appropriate regulations which:

(1) define the specific types of research permitted,

(2) exclude from further research activity any persons who previously held key positions in German war research,

(3) provide for frequent inspection,

(4) require free disclosure of the results of the research and

(5) impose severe penalties, including permanent closing of the offending institution, whenever the regulations are violated.

Pending agreement in the Control Council you will adopt such measures in your own zone.

 

32. Pending final Allied agreements on reparation and on control or elimination of German industries that can be utilized for war production, the Control Council should:

a. prohibit and prevent production of iron and steel, chemicals, non-ferrous metals (excluding aluminum and magnesium), machine tools, radio and electrical equipment, automotive vehicles, heavy machinery and important parts thereof, except for the purposes stated in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive

b. prohibit and prevent rehabilitation of plant and equipment in such industries except for the purposes stated in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive; and

c. safeguard plant and equipment in such industries for transfer on reparation account.

Pending agreement in the Control Council, you will put such measures into effect in your own zone as soon as you have had an opportunity to review and determine production necessary for the purposes stated in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive.

 

33. The Control Council should adopt a policy permitting the conversion of facilities other than those mentioned in paragraphs 30 and 32 to the production of light consumer goods, provided that such conversion does not prejudice the subsequent removal of plant and equipment on reparation account and does not require any imports beyond those necessary for the purposes specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive. Pending agreement in the Control Council, you may permit such conversion in your zone.

 

34. Subject to the provisions of paragraphs 30 and 32, the Control Council should assure that all feasible measures are taken to facilitate, to the minimum extent necessary for the purposes outlined in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive.

a. repairs to and restoration of essential transportation services and public utilities;

b. emergency repair and construction of the minimum shelter required for the civilian population;

c. production of coal and any other goods and services (excluding goods specified in paragraphs 30 and 32 unless measures to facilitate production are specifically approved by this Government through the Joint Chiefs of Staff) required for the purposes outlined in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive.

You will assure that such measures are taken in your own zone pending agreement in the Control Council.

 

35. In your capacity as zone commander and as member of the Control Council you will take steps to provide for the equitable interzonal distribution and the movement of goods and services essential to the purposes set forth in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive.

 

36. You will prohibit all cartels or other private business arrangements and cartel-like organizations, including those of a public or quasi-public character such as the Wirtschaftsgruppen providing for the regulation of marketing conditions, including production, prices, exclusive exchange of technical information and processes, and allocation of sales territories. Such necessary public functions as have been discharged by these organizations shall be absorbed as rapidly as possible by approved public agencies.

 

37. It is the policy of your government to effect a dispersion of the ownership and control of German industry. To assist in carrying out this policy you will make a survey of combines and pools, mergers, holding companies and interlocking directorates and communicate the results, together with recommendations, to your government through the Joint Chiefs of Staff. You will endeavor to obtain agreement in the Control Council to the making of this survey in the other zones of occupation and you will urge the coordination of the methods and results of this survey in the various zones.

 

38. With due regard to paragraph 4 a, the Control Council should adopt such policies as are clearly necessary to prevent or restrain inflation of a character or dimension which would definitely endanger accomplishment of the objectives of the occupation. The Control Council, in particular, should direct and empower German authorities to maintain or establish controls over prices and wages and to take the fiscal and financial measures necessary to this end. Pending agreement in the Control Council you will assure that such measures as you consider necessary are taken in your own zone. Prevention or restraint of inflation shall not constitute an additional ground for the importation of supplies, nor shall it constitute an additional ground for limiting removal, destruction or curtailment of productive facilities in fulfillment of the program for reparation, demilitarization and industrial disarmament.

 

 

 

Power, Transportation, and Communications

 

39. Both as member of the Control Council and zone commander you will take appropriate steps to ensure that

a. power, transportation and communications facilities are directed in such a way as to carry out the objectives outlined in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive;

b. Germans ale prohibited and prevented from producing, maintaining or operating all types of aircraft.

You will determine the degree to which centralized control and administration of power, transportation and communications is clearly necessary for the objectives stated in paragraphs 4 and 5 and urge the establishment of this degree of centralized control and administration by the Control Council.

 

 

Foreign Trade and Reparation

 

40. The Control Council should establish centralized control over all trade in goods and services with foreign countries. Pending agreement in the Control Council you will impose appropriate controls in your own zone.

 

41. Both as member of the Control Council and as zone commander you will take appropriate steps to ensure that:

a. the foreign trade controls are designed to carry out the objectives stated in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive;

b. imports which are permitted and furnished to Germany are confined to those unavoidably necessary to the objectives stated in paragraphs 4 and 5;

c. exports to countries other than the United Nations are prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Allied governments.

 

42. Both as member of the Control Council and as zone commander you will adopt a policy which would forbid German firms to participate in international cartels or other restrictive contracts and arrangements and order the prompt termination of all existing German participations in such cartels, contracts and arrangements.

 

43. You will carry out in your zone such programs of reparation and restitution as are embodied in Allied agreements and you will seek agreement in the Control Council on any policies and measures which it may be necessary to apply throughout Germany in order to ensure the execution of such programs.

 

 

 

PART III Financial

 

44. You will make full application in the financial field of the principles stated elsewhere in this directive and you will endeavor to have the Control Council adopt uniform financial policies necessary to carry out the purposes stated in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive. You will take no steps designed to maintain, strengthen or operate the German financial structure except in so far as may be necessary for the purposes specified in this directive.

 

45. The Control Council should regulate and control to the extent required for the purposes set forth in paragraphs 4 and 5 the issue and volume of currency and the extension of credit in Germany and in accordance with the following principles:

a. United States forces and other Allied forces will use Allied Military marks and Reichsmark currency or coins in their possession. Allied Military marks and Reichsmark currency and coin now in circulation in Germany will be legal tender without distinction and will be interchangeable at the rate of one Allied Military mark for one Reichsmark. Reichskreditkassenscheine and other German military currency will not be legal tender in Germany.

b. The Reichsbank, the Rentenbank or any other bank or agency may be permitted or required to issue bank notes and currency which will be legal tender; without such authorization no German governmental or private bank or agency will be permitted to issue bank notes or currency.

c. The German authorities may be required to make available Reichsmark currency or credits free of cost and in amounts sufficient to meet all the expenses of the forces of occupation, including the cost of Allied Military Government and including to the extent that compensation is made therefor, the cost of such private property as may be requisitioned, seized, or otherwise acquired, by Allied authorities for reparations or restitution purposes.

Pending agreement in the Control Council you will follow these policies in your own zone.

You will receive separate instructions relative to the currency which you will use in the event that for any reason adequate supplies of Allied Military marks and Reichsmarks are not available, or if the use of such currency is found undesirable.

You will not announce or establish in your zone, until receipt of further instructions, any general rate of exchange between the Reichsmark on the one hand and the U. S. dollar and other currencies on the other. However, a rate of exchange to be used exclusively for pay of troops and military accounting purposes in your zone will be communicated separately to you.

 

46. Subject to any agreed policies of the Control Council, you are authorized to take the following steps and to put into effect such further financial measures as you may deem necessary to accomplish the purposes of your occupation:

a. To prohibit, or to prescribe regulations regarding transfer or other dealings in private or public securities or real estate or other property.

b. To close banks, but only for a period long enough for you to introduce satisfactory control, to remove Nazi and other undesirable personnel, and to issue instructions for the determination of accounts to be blocked under subparagraph 48 e below.

c. To close stock exchanges, insurance companies, and similar financial institutions for such periods as you deem appropriate.

d. To establish a general or limited moratorium or moratoria only to the extent clearly necessary to carry out the objectives stated in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive.

 

47. Resumption of partial or complete service on the internal public debt at the earliest feasible date is deemed desirable. The Control Council should decide the time and manner of such resumption.

 

48. Subject to any agreed policies of the Control Council,

a. You will prohibit:

(1) the payment of all military pensions, or emoluments or benefits, except compensation for physical disability limiting the recipient’s ability to work, at rates which are no higher than the lowest of those for comparable physical disability arising from non-military causes.

(2) the payment of all public or private pensions or other emoluments or benefits granted or conferred:

(a) by reason of membership in or services to the former Nazi party, its formations, affiliated associations or supervised organizations,

(b) to any person who has been removed from an office or position in accordance with paragraph 6, and,

(c) to any person arrested and detained in accordance with paragraph 8 during the term of his arrest, or permanently, in case of his subsequent conviction.

b. You will take such action as may be necessary to insure that all laws and practices relating to taxation or other fields of finance, which discriminate for or against any persons because of race, nationality, creed or political opinion, will be amended, suspended, or abrogated to the extent necessary to eliminate such discrimination.

c. You will hold the German authorities responsible for taking such measures in the field of taxation and other fields of public finance, including restoration of the tax system and maintenance of tax revenues, as will further the accomplishment of the objectives stated in paragraphs 4 and 5.

d. You will exercise general supervision over German public expenditures in order to ensure that they are consistent with the objectives stated in paragraphs 4 and 5.

e. You will impound or block all gold, silver, currencies, securities, accounts in financial institutions, credits, valuable papers, and all other assets falling within the following categories:

(1) Property owned or controlled directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by any of the following:

(a) The German Reich, or any of the Lander, Gaue or provinces, any Kreis, Municipality or other similar local subdivision; or any agency or instrumentality of any of them including all utilities, undertakings, public corporations or monopolies under the control of any of the above;

(b) Governments, nationals or residents of other nations, including those of territories occupied by them, at war with any of the United Nations at any time since 1 September 1939;

(c) The Nazi Party, its formations, affiliated associations and supervised organizations, its officials, leading members and supporters;

(d) All organizations, clubs or other associations prohibited or dissolved by military government;

(e) Absentee owners, of non-German nationality including United Nations and neutral governments and Germans outside of Germany;

(f) Any institution dedicated to public worship, charity, education or the arts and sciences which has been used by the Nazi Party to further its interests or to cloak its activities;

(g) Persons subject to arrest under provisions of paragraph 8, and all other persons specified by military government by inclusion in lists or otherwise.

(2) Property which has been the subject of transfer under duress or wrongful acts of confiscation, disposition or spoliation, whether pursuant to legislation or by procedure purporting to follow forms of law or otherwise.

(3) Works of art or cultural material of value or importance, regardless of the ownership thereof.

You will take such action as will insure that any impounded or blocked assets will be dealt with only as permitted under licenses or other instructions which you may issue. In the case particularly of property blocked under (1) (a) above, you will proceed to adopt licensing measures which while maintaining such property under surveillance would permit its use in consonance with this directive. In the case of property blocked under (2) above, you will institute measures for prompt restitution, in conformity with the objectives stated in paragraphs 4 and 5 and subject to appropriate safeguards to prevent the cloaking of Nazi and militaristic influence.

 

49. All foreign exchange transactions, including those arising out of exports and imports, shall be controlled with the aim of preventing Germany from developing a war potential and of achieving the other objectives set forth in this directive. To effectuate these purposes the Control Council should:

a. Seek out and reduce to the possession and control of a special agency all German (public and private) foreign exchange and external assets of every kind and description located within or outside Germany.

b. Prohibit, except as authorized by regulation or license, all dealings in gold, silver, foreign exchange, and all foreign exchange transactions of any kind. Make available any foreign exchange proceeds of exports for payment of imports directly necessary to the accomplishment of the objectives stated in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this directive, and authorize no other outlay of foreign exchange assets except for purposes approved by the Control Council or other appropriate authority.

c. Establish effective controls with respect to all foreign exchange transactions, including:

(1) Transactions as to property between persons inside Germany and persons outside Germany;

(2) Transactions involving obligations owed by or to become due from any person in Germany to any person outside Germany; and

(3) Transactions involving the importation into or exportation from Germany of any foreign exchange asset or other form of property.

Pending agreement in the Control Council, you will take in your zone the action indicated in subparagraphs a, b and c above. Accordingly, you will in your zone reduce to the possession and control of a special agency established by you, within your Command, all German foreign exchange and external assets as provided in subparagraph a. You will endeavor to have similar agencies for the same purpose established in the other zones of occupation and to have them merged as soon as practicable in one agency for the entire occupied territory. In addition you will provide full reports to your government with respect to all German foreign exchange and external assets.

 

50. No extension of credit to Germany or Germans by any foreign person or Government shall be permitted except that the Control Council may in special emergencies grant permission for such extensions of credit.

 

51. It is not anticipated that you will make credits available to the Reichsbank or any other bank or to any public or private institution. If, in your opinion, such action becomes essential, you may take such emergency actions as you may deem proper, but in any event, you will report the facts to the Control Council.

 

52. You will main such accounts and records as may be necessary to reflect the financial operations of the military government in your zone and you will provide the Control Council with such information as it may require, including information in connection with the use of currency by your forces, any governmental settlements, occupation costs, and other expenditures arising out of operations or activities involving participation of your forces.

(Department of State: Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, vol. 3, European Advisory Commission; Austria; Germany, p. 484)

______________________________

 

 

 

[5] Psychologist in Germany: The Story of an American Intelligence Officer — Hardcover – 1 Jan 1946, by Saul K Padover (Author) 400 pages.

 

Saul Kussiel Padover (April 13, 1905–February 22, 1981) (jewish) was an historian and political scientist at the New School for Social Research in New York City.

 

Padover was born in Vienna, Austria, and came to the United States at the age of fifteen in 1920, with his father, Keva Padover, an American citizen, and his mother, the former Frumet Goldmann. Padover earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from Wayne State University in Detroit., Michigan. From 1928-1929, he enrolled in graduate coursework at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. In 1930, he received a Master of Arts from and in 1932 a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago. Padover accepted research positions at the University of Chicago in 1932 and then a longer stint at the University of California at Berkeley. From 1938-1944, he worked in the United States Department of Interior during the long tenure of Secretary Harold L. Ickes. In 1944, Padover was a political analyst based in London for the Federal Communications Commission. He also served as an intelligence officer for the Office of Strategic Services, forerunner of the Central Intelligence Agency, and for the United States Army from 1944-1946.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul_K._Padover

 

————————–

 

 Nuremberg 014

 

 

 

======================================

 

 

 

 

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (4.0 MB). >>Nuremberg and Other War Crimes a New Look – Part 3
 

Version History

 

Version 2: Dec 20, 2017 — Improved formatting.

 

Version 1: Published Oct 7, 2014
Posted in Auschwitz, Holocaust, Jews, Revisionism, The International Jew, Third Reich, WW II | Leave a comment

The Case for Germany – Part 10 (last) – Agriculture; Munich and After

 The Case for Germany - Cover Ver 2

 

[Part 10]

 

 

 

I am deeply stirred by the word which Ulrich Hutten wrote the last time he seized his pen: — Germany.

ADOLF HITLER

January 30th, 1937

 

 

 

The Case for Germany 

 

A Study of Modern Germany 

 

by

A. P. Laurie

M. A. Cantab., D. Sc., LL. D. Edin., F. C. S., F. R. S. E.

With a Preface by Admiral Sir Barry Domvile

K. B. E., C. B., C. M. G.

Berlin W 15

Internationaler Verlag

1939

FIRST EDITION ………… JUNE 1939

SECOND EDITION ……. JULY 1939

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

PRINTED IN GERMANY

DEDICATION

It is with admiration and gratitude for the great work he has done for the German people that I dedicate this book to the Fuhrer.

A. P. L.

TO THE READER

There are two sides to every question. You have read one side in our Press for six years.

This book gives the other side.

A. P. L.

 Artur Pillians Laurie

PREFACE

 

It is a great pleasure to me to introduce the public to Dr. Laurie’s valuable book on modern Germany. He is best known to the world as a brilliant scientist, but he has found time in the intervals of his work to pursue with ardour the task upon which every sensible member of the British and German races should be engaged — namely the establishment of good relations and a better understanding between these two great nations.

Dr Laurie knows full well that this friendship is the keystone to peace in Europe — nay, in the whole world.

He is one of the small group who founded the Association known as “The Link”, whose sole aim is to get Britons and Germans to know and understand one another better. He is one of the most zealous workers in this good cause in the country.

He writes of the National Socialist movement with knowledge and great sympathy.

The particular value of this book lies in the fact that it is written by a foreigner, who cannot be accused of patriotic excess in his interpretation of the great work done by Herr Hitler and his associates. I recommend this volume with confidence to all people who are genuinely impressed with the desire to understand one of the greatest — and most bloodless — revolutions in history.

BARRY DOMVILE

Robin’s Tree

8th May 1939.

 

 

“As we advance in our social knowledge, we shall endeavour to make our governments paternal as well as judicial; that is, to establish such laws and authorities as may at once direct us in our occupations, protect us against our follies, and visit us in our distresses; a government which shall repress dishonesty, as now it punishes theft; which shall show how the discipline of the masses may be brought to aid the toils of peace, as the discipline of the masses has hitherto knit the sinews of battle; a government which shall have its soldiers of the ploughshare as well as its soldiers of the sword, and which shall distribute more proudly its golden crosses of industry — golden as the glow of the harvest — than it now grants its bronze crosses of honour — bronzed with the crimson of blood.

RUSKIN. Political Economy of Art.

 

 

“All front fighters fought side by side and went through an inferno. They are all comparable to the heroes of the ancient world. It was the manhood of the nations in their prime who fought and experienced the horrors of modern war.

In another war the flower of the nations’ men and women will have to fight. Europe will be destroyed if the best in all of the nations are wiped out. A new conflict will exceed even the ghastly tragedies of the Great War.

I believe that those who rattle the sabres have not participated in war. I know that war veterans speak and think differently.

They energetically desire to prevent another conflict. I hope that the men who are standing before me can contribute to preserve the peace of the world — a peace of honour and equality for all.

Let us not talk of prestige as between the victors and the defeated. This is my one request: Forget what has divided the nations before and remember that history has advanced.”

Field Marshal GOERING addressing the British

and German war veterans.

 

 

CONTENTS

 

CHAPTER ……………………………………………………………. PAGE

 

Dedication

To the Reader

Preface

Field Marshall Goering’s Address

I.   DER FUHRER ……………………………………………………….. 11

II.   THE BELEAGUERED CITY ……………………………………. 21

III.   NATIONAL SOCIALISM ……………………………………… 25

IV.   THE NAZI RALLYS AT NUREMBERG ……………………. 34

V.   THE FOREIGN POLICY OF GERMANY ……………………. 41

VI.   ENGLAND AND GERMANY ………………………………….. 49

VII.   MARCH 7th, A MOST IMPORTANT DATE …………… 54

VIII.   THE REAL ENEMY OF EUROPE ……………………….. 58

IX.   COMMUNISM VERSUS NATIONAL SOCIALISM …… 62

X.   THE UNION OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE …………………. 68

XI.   ACTS OF “AGGRESSION” BY GERMANY ……………… 79

XII.   THE DANCE OF DEATH ……………………………………… 85

XIII.   OUR FUTURE POLICY TOWARDS GERMANY ……. 93

XIV.   THE HITLER YOUTH MOVEMENT ……………………… 100

XV.   THE WINTER HELP ORGANIZATION ………………….. 104

XVI.   NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND THE PROTESTANT

CHURCH ……………………………………………………………………… 109

XVII. ECONOMICS …………………………………………………….. 118

XVIII. THE FOUR YEARS PLAN …………………………………… 138

XIX.   THE GERMAN COLONIES …………………………………. 141

XX.   THE LABOUR FRONT ………………………………………….. 146

XXI.   AGRICULTURE …………………………………………………. 155

XXII. MUNICH AND AFTER ………………………………………… 167

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter Twentyone

 

 

AGRICULTURE

 

 

I have already dealt briefly in the chapter on Economics with the agricultural problem, but it is so important, being the foundation on which everything rests, that I propose to discuss it here in more detail. It is also of interest as showing the way in which the National Socialist Government approaches an economic problem. They begin by approaching it as a social problem, the well being of the agriculturist and his family and their recognition as a living and essential part of the community being the first question to be considered. In no case do they indulge in revolutionary economics. They have not only accepted the existing economic structure in Germany, but they go further than that and search into the past history to find a solid foundation on which to build. Germany has her big land owners but she also has her peasant proprietors amounting to more than 500,000 families among whom the custom of inheritance from father to son is very largely prevalent.

 

The Bauer, the Peasant Proprietor is the solid foundation Hitler says, on which to build a state, and he must be established and protected by law so as to form a Peasant Aristocracy, proud of their position in the commonwealth and recognition by the State. It is a class alas absent in this country except where a county council has established small holdings. The English yeoman and peasant farmer was destroyed by the robbery of the commons and the enclosure act.

 

In France, in Germany and in Austria, the farm house of the peasant is familiar in the landscape, sometimes clustered in villages, in other places far apart. Under one roof is the family house, and storage for hay, and room for all the pigs and cattle during the hard continental winter, when everything must be gathered under one roof. The peasant is an interesting feature of most continental countries. In Italy he scorns to marry a townsman and it is among them that you find purity of race and handsome men and beautiful girls. The castle on the mountain side has long been a ruin. The peasant’s home continues from one generation to another.

 

[Page 156]

 

In Spain the population of the cities have no national characteristics or race features, and are poor undergrown specimens of humanity. I have never forgotten seeing the peasants riding into Toledo in their picturesque costumes. These were the men who had conquered Mexico and Peru and showed race in every feature.

 

Hitler is right, therefore, when he builds the German State on the peasant, a race which we destroyed in the 18th century to satisfy the greed of our land owners.

 

While in Russia the Soviet have been striving to destroy the peasant and convert him into a communal wage slave, a struggle in which millions have died of starvation, Hitler has built his State on the peasant as its foundation.

 

The contrast between Communism and National Socialism could not be more marked. The National Socialist builds on a long tried system of land ownership; Communism sweeps it all away in the name of an untried economic theory. Under the law establishing the peasant it has been made illegal to lend money on the security of the house and land and they cannot be sold in payment of debts.

 

Another interesting provision is that any destitute member of the family has the right to claim the shelter of the ancestral home.

 

We shall never solve our agricultural difficulties in this country until the man who tills the soil owns the soil or has it in perpetual lease direct from the State.

 

Another important principle established in Germany is that the land yields its best return to the intense cultivation of the small unit of land. The application of mass production ideas to the land has already in the U.S.A. and in Australia converted millions of acres into a desert. The small economic unit is the right principle for cultivation but it is at a disadvantage in selling the product, and this is where the second part of the organisation comes in.

 

[Page 157]

 

On the 13th September, 1933, the German Government enacted as the basic law for agriculture, the National Food Corporation Act which decided the provisional constitution of this organisation. Thus the Corporation was lifted from the level of a voluntary organisation to the position of a public body. The National Food Corporation became a compulsory institution for the persons affected, and is subject to official supervision. Therefore the National Food Corporation includes not only the productive group — that is agriculture itself — but also all those groups which are in any way concerned with providing the German nation with food. They comprise the groups engaged in the manufacture of various commodities out of these products as well as those concerned with the distribution to the consumer. By reason of this co-operation, the National Food Corporation forms a body consisting of producers, manufacturers and distributors all of whom are of equal importance within this organisation.

 

The following is a rough outline of the organisation of the National Food Corporation.

 

At the head of the whole organisation of the National Food Corporation is the National Peasants Fuhrer, R. Walther Darre with his deputy.

 

To assist him the Peasants Fuhrer has an advisory body, the Reichsbauernrat (National Peasants Council), membership of which is purely honorary. Its members are nominated by the Peasants Fuhrer.

 

In the Stabsamt (Planning Dept.) the Peasants Fuhrer has created an institution where the work is planned for many years ahead by several main sections which deal with questions of trade and industry, law, comparative agriculture, training in agricultural practice and theory, the introduction of up-to-date working methods, peasant customs and racial matters.

 

[Page 158]

 

In the Verwaltungsamt (Executive Department) the plans already decided on by the Stabsamt are put into operation.

 

Section I of the Verwaltungsamt is concerned with the welfare of the individual, be he the owner of an agricultural estate, that is to say peasant or agriculturist, tenant farmer or agricultural labourer. All questions bearing on the rural population are treated here.

 

Section II of the Verwaltungsamt deals with all questions of rural economy, with the homestead, with the estate, in short with everything connected with the peasant’s calling. It comprises, besides the technical side, all matters connected with soil, crops, and plant life, training, forestry. agricultural implements and machinery as well as with domestic economy.

 

Section III of the Verwaltungsamt is responsible for the organisation of the market, e. g. for questions of the distribution of supplies for the utilization or processing of agricultural produce. The economic bodies concerned are grouped in eighteen associations which — under their own administration have been assigned special duties to the community but are under the direction of Section III. The following are the most important organisations:

 

Hauptvereinigung der Deutschen Getreidewirtschaft.

(National Union of Corn Producers and Distributors).

Hauptvereinigung der Deutschen Viehwirtschaft.

(National Union of Live-stock Breeders and Dealers).

Hauptvereinigung der Deutschen Milchwirtschaft.

(National Union of Milk Producers and Distributors).

Hauptvereinigung der Deutschen Eierwirtschaft.

(National Union of Egg Producers and Distributors).

Hauptvereinigung der Deutschen Gartenbauwirtschaft.

(National Union of Market Gardeners).

Reichsverband Deutscher landwirtschaftlicher Genossenschaften.

(National Union of German Agricultural Co-operative Societies).

Hauptvereinigung der Deutschen Brauwirtschaft.

(National Union of the German Brewing Industry).

Wirtschaftliche Vereinigung der Deutschen Susswarenwirtschaft.

(Economical Union of Confectioneries).

Hauptvereinigung der Deutschen Fischwirtschaft.

(National Union of the Fishing Trade).

 

[Page 159]

 

Wirtschaftliche Vereinigung der Margarine-und Kunstspeisefettindustrie.

(Union of the Margarine and Artificial Fat Industry).

Hauptvereinigung der Deutschen Kartoffelwirtschaft.

(National Union of Potato Growers and Distributors).

 

In addition to the sections enumerated, the Verwaltungsamt has three more sections. Two of these are concerned with financial matters and questions of personnel while the section “Public Enlightenment is responsible for the press, broadcasting, the organisation of exhibitions, films, lectures, agricultural market information, advertising, literature, publishing, archives, and libraries.

 

An Inspector-General has been appointed to superintend the setting into operation of special schemes and to control the offices of the Landes-und Kreisbauernschaften (Regional and District Peasant Associations).

 

The National Food Corporation is subdivided into Landesbauernschaften (Regional Peasant Associations) whose area generally coincides with that of the various German Federal States or the Prussian provinces. The Landesbauernfuhrer (Regional Peasants Fuhrer) and his deputy are responsible for the work of the Regional Associations. The organisation is similar to that of the Verwaltungsamt for the whole of the Reich, though on a smaller scale. There are in all twenty Regional Associations which are in turn subdivided into Kreisand Ortsbauernschaften (District and Local Peasant Associations).

 

The Districts Association are, in the main, in close touch with the peasants and land owners and supply them with such advice as cannot be supplied by the Local Associations.

 

Each District Association is headed by a District Association Fuhrer who holds an honorary position.

 

The administration of the Local Associations is also an honorary function. The Fuhrer of the Local Association is in uninterrupted touch with each peasant and thus holds a particularly responsible office.

 

[Page 160]

 

Finally, it should be mentioned that the National Food Corporation also supervises the peasants’ schools, the agricultural schools and colleges, and the stock breeding boards, so that it includes in its sphere of activity everything connected with the task for which it is competent.

 

 

Marketing regulations

 

It has already been intimated that the National Socialist agrarian policy has abandoned (in the case of particularly important food products) the capitalistic maxim that the price is dependent on supply and demand. In this way not only the distributors and manufacturers but also the producers of our food supplies are no longer forced to go in for financial speculation. In this respect, the poorer classes were at the greatest disadvantage; for, lacking the necessary capital to await favourable times, they had to sell their goods prematurely in order to obtain ready money. The peasant as a rule, belonged to the class of speculators with limited capital, for he can generally turn over his capital only once a year. The same applied to the middle-sized industries immediately connected with agricultural produce, such as flour mills and breweries. As a result, many of the small and middle-sized concerns were taken over by larger firms with considerable capital, a development unfavourable to national economy. The harmful influence of this speculation was counteracted by the marketing regulations laid down by the National Socialist agrarian policy which introduced fixed prices, and fixed prices means fair prices.

 

A fair price must fulfil the double condition of protecting both the producer and the consumer. The peasant and the agriculturist must be protected against the necessity of having to sell their products at cut prices if they are to sell them at all; whereas the consumer’s interests must be guarded against being robbed at times when, owing to seasonal changes, production falls off. The fixed price should be high enough to cover the cost of production and to guarantee the proper continuance of agricultural work.

 

[Page 161]

 

On the other hand, it must be low enough to exclude the possibility of the consumer’s being robbed; the consumer, in fact, should always be able to rely on stable prices which are in proportion to his income. In this way the prices of bread, milk and butter, for example, have remained stationary for years, though, from a speculative point of view, price fluctuations would have been technically justified by the variation in the yield of the annual crops etc. The fixing of the prices has, however, prevented this to the benefit of both parties. With regard to the necessities of daily life, the prices have also been fixed, generally speaking, for the dealers’ trade as well as for the trader utilizing or processing agricultural produce. In fixing the rate of the middleman’s margin it was not intended to kill this trade since it has long shown its value as a machinery for private distribution. The idea was simply to remove any possibility of financial speculation on the part of anyone concerned.

 

But the marketing regulations have other important functions apart from mere price regulation. In the first place they regulate the functioning of the entire system of manufacture and distribution. Furthermore, by means of the marketing regulations a systematic organisation of the sale of agricultural products is secured. This shall here under be demonstrated by an example taken from the dairy business.

 

Before the agricultural marketing regulations were introduced, the milk market was in a chaotic state. Obviously, everyone wished to share in supplying milk to the big towns, because the best prices were to be obtained there. The milk supplied to Berlin, for instance, did not all come from the surrounding districts, but was in part sent hundreds of miles, even from the Allgau, a district situated in the extreme south of Germany. This is explained by the fact that the Allgau peasant received locally for his home made butter and cheese such a poor return that he found it a better paying proposition to send his milk to Berlin, in spite of the distance. Apart from the middleman’s profit there was the enormous cost of haulage over some 435 miles to be paid. Things went from bad to worse, and no solution appeared possible. At the same time it was found impossible to lower the retail price because the unproductive middleman’s charges prevented any reduction. When marketing regulations were introduced, the dairy business throughout Germany was divided into certain milk supply regions, an arrangement which has proved extremely beneficial to the entire dairy trade.

 

[Page 162]

 

Similar arrangements have been made for the supply of other commodities.

 

The marketing regulations also endeavour to improve the quality of all products of German soil. The price of superior qualities cannot be demanded for inferior qualities; the idea of improving the quality is therefore not penalized but encouraged. For purposes of research in the direction of the improvement of quality the National Food Corporation is provided with all manner of research and teaching institutions. Hence marketing regulations imply not stagnation but increased efficiency.

 

Where necessary, the marketing regulations also help to secure order and discipline in the market. The problem of food supplies cannot be allowed to depend on the arbitrary action of individuals to the extent of affecting the common interest. The private individual’s initiative is in no way restricted, but competition must be kept within bounds, so as not to become harmful to the national economy. In cases of harmful and unnecessary competition the National Food Corporation can take decisive action by licensing only such a number of businesses in any locality or districts as may be reasonably expected to make a living.

 

It may be pointed out once more that marketing regulations are not identical with “planned economy. Nobody intends to limit the area under the plough or to enforce certain rules concerning cultivation. There is a fundamental difference between marketing regulations and “planned economy.

 

To sum up, the following are the functions assigned to the marketing regulations:

 

I. Protection of the producer

Fair, fixed prices.

Assured sales.

II. Protection of the consumer

Fair and stable prices for the consumer.

Fair supply even in case of scarcity.

Guaranty of quality.

Control of supplies.

III. Organised movement of goods, organised manufacture

Compulsory Pools (Andienungspficht).

Sensible distribution of goods.

Fixing of quotas.

Fixing of a fair margin of profit.

Principle of efficiency.

 

[Page 163]

 

 

Establishing a New German Peasantry

 

The term landliche Siedlung (rural settlement) is more generally used than Neubildung Deutschen Bauerntums (Establishing a New German Peasantry); the latter, however, gives a clearer idea of the actual facts. Miniature and suburban settlements will not be considered here, nor for that matter cottage settlements which, from small beginnings, develop into peasant holdings.

 

It is the aim of the National Food Corporation to create as many new peasants’ estates as possible, particularly in thinly populated districts. They must have the size of at least one Ackernahrung (i. e. sustaining a man, his wife and two children), thus guaranteeing a livelihood from the soil worked.

 

The success hitherto attained in establishing a new German peasantry is, strange to say, hard to express in figures. Thus, not much is gained by stating that, in 1934, nearly 5,000 new estates were set up. Neither can a clear idea of the development in this direction be gathered from the fact that 144,617 hectares (approximately 357,000 acres) of land in all parts of Germany were provided for purposes of internal colonisation in 1934. But in comparison with the fact that, during the years 1919 to 1932, on the average only 67,184 hectares (approximately 165,000 acres) per year were provided for the same purpose, it will easily be seen that the establishment of new peasants’ estates is proceeding rapidly.

 

[Page 164]

 

There are three ways for providing land for this purpose.

 

A certain acreage will be provided out of the large landed estates. It should, however, be made clear that this does not mean any compulsory expropriation of large properties, but that the owners will be compensated for the land acquired for this purpose. Besides privately owned land, government property also will be utilized for internal colonization, as far as technical conditions permit. The Reichssiedlungsgesetz (Reich Act to make provision for Internal Colonization) provides the possibility of obtaining from private and public estates in the manner described an acreage of nearly 1.7 million hectares (approximately 4.2 million acres) with a view to creating new agricultural land. It is, however, not yet possible to say when the whole of this land will be available.

 

A second possibility of providing land for agricultural purposes is the cultivation of waste land, bogs, fens and swamps. This method of obtaining arable soil is particularly important since in this way useless land is turned into useful land. In contrast to the cultivation of bogs we cannot base exaggerated hopes on the cultivation of waste land, because there is only a limited quantity of the latter available. It must also be borne in mind that certain stretches of waste land can never be made productive owing to peculiarities of conditions such as climate, altitude, nature of the soil, etc., which cannot very well be changed. The total area in Germany utilisable from an agrarian point of view is about 30 million hectares (approximately 73 million acres). It would be unlike the German peasant to have allowed millions of hectares of waste land to lie idle beside his good fields. In the case of bogs and swamps, the conditions, as already pointed out, are entirely different. Here, in contrast to the case of waste land, the individual has generally no possibility of undertaking by himself any successful and comprehensive reclamation. Results can only be realised when a large part or the entire area of the bog is tackled at the same time.

 

For this reason it has been advisable to make use of the Arbeitsdienst (Labour Service) for the cultivation of waste land. We may estimate the area of bog and waste land capable of being cultivated at about 2 million hectares (approximately 5 million acres). It is, of course, impossible to achieve great results at short notice. Nevertheless, extensive reclamation of bog and waste land, amounting to over 200,000 hectares (approximately 500,000 acres) has already begun. This land is situated in all parts of Germany. The most important reclamation would appear to be the Rhin and Havel swamps near Berlin, the Sprotte fens in Silesia, the Ried marshes in Hesse, the Chiemgau bog and the Danube marshes in Bavaria and the swamps on the left bank of the river Ems in North West Germany. In the Labour Service young Germans of all classes have an opportunity of becoming acquainted with and acquiring respect for the work involved in the reclamation of the German bogs and marshes.

 

[Page 165]

 

Unfailing energy and tenacity have been and will be called for in order to make use of this possibility of obtaining new land, namely by reclamation from the sea. Extensive dykes are required. Since the German nation, the “People without Space” needs new land, they will not shrink even from the most difficult tasks. Within a 50-year programme, the North Sea on the West coast of Schleswig-Holstein alone is to yield up 100,000 hectares (approximately 250,000 acres) of new land. Good results have already been obtained. In 1935 the Adolf Hitler polder, 1,334 hectares (approximately 3,300 acres) in area, and the Hermann Goring polder, 550 hectares (approximately 1,300 acres) in area, were inaugurated. In this way land for nearly one hundred peasant estates under the new Act has been provided. A considerably greater number of hand-craftsmen’s settlements have also been formed here.

 

The selection of new peasants depends on certain conditions. It goes without saying that they must be of German descent. The peasant and his wife must be valuable individuals from a racial point of view and come from healthy stock, so that a guaranty is provided for healthy offspring. Families with many children are given preference when new land is being distributed. It is also of primary importance that the applicant should be able to prove that he himself as well as his family are suited to the life. These new peasant estates must not be regarded as a practising ground for all and anyone to try their hands at experimenting, nor as an instructional institution for those who consider themselves fitted for agricultural work. Technical qualifications are therefore required under all circumstances. Only where these primary conditions are satisfied the financial situation of the applicant is considered. For financing these undertakings definite rules have been drawn up on lines which make it possible even for persons of moderate means to take over one of those new estates.

 

[Page 166]

 

The establishment of these new peasant estates is undertaken by estate companies under the supervision of competent authorities, an arrangement which guarantees close co-operation with the National Food Corporation. The new agricultural estates are got ready up to a point from which it is possible to begin to work them properly where after every peasant is free to make the best use possible of the opportunity afforded him for improving his position according to his personal energy and for endeavouring to do his best for his own welfare and that of his descendants. Only by struggling to succeed will he become attached to the soil. Not only younger sons of peasants are to be provided with a new estate, but everyone capable of fulfilling the required conditions, particularly agricultural labourers. Since these latter cannot, as a rule, compete with the others financially, especially favourable conditions will apply in their case, and they will thus be provided with the possibility of rising in the social scale.

 

Besides these fundamental matters a certain number of other points have to be considered in connection with the planning of houses, schools, and with similar questions. Their solution will, as a rule, be arrived at in practice. As a result of the close co-operation between the competent authorities, the National Food Corporation and the estate companies, the conditions laid down by the National Food Corporation will always be carefully observed.

 

This great work of settlement and internal colonization going on in Germany serves the end of national reconstruction. Where reconstruction is taking place, peace must prevail. Hence Germany too needs peace for her work.

 

[Page 167]

 

 

 

 

Chapter Twentytwo

 

 

MUNICH AND AFTER

 

Why do the heathens rage and the people imagine a vain thing

 

 

Since the signing of the Peace Pact between Chamberlain and Hitler in September events have moved rapidly in Europe. The reply in Great Britain to the Peace Pact was a violent campaign in the British Press against Germany, and an attack on Chamberlain’s policy both by the Opposition in Parliament and by many members of his own party. The Peace Pact was ignored and war with Germany discussed as a matter of course. Chamberlain was only able to save his position by increasing enormously the expenditure on armaments.

 

The large number of people in this country, who believe a good understanding with Germany essential had no opportunity of putting forward their point of view in the press. The members of Parliament were intimidated by the press campaign. The only institution left where a free expression of opinion was possible was the House of Lords. The warmongers controlled both the press and the B. B. C.

 

The final victory of Franco enormously strengthened the position of the Axis in Europe to the great astonishment of our press who, having pursued him with a vile campaign of calumny during the war, assisted by a political agitation in this country, imagined that he would join with us. Franco’s reply to our advances was to join the anti-Comintern Pact and France, who had taken the side of the Communists, found herself with three potential enemies on her three frontiers.

 

Hungary also joined the anti-Comintern Pact, and Jugoslavia entered into the closest friendship with Germany and Italy, so that Great Britain and France found themselves faced with a formidable bloc in Europe, of nations they had treated with hostility or indifference.

 

[Page 168]

 

President Roosevelt next joined the campaign against Germany and Italy. The Press and the wireless had been used for months to spread lies about Germany and when the ground had been prepared Roosevelt made a violent attack on Germany and Italy, and proposed a combination of the Democracies against them and a trade boycott. As Senator Pittman put it clearly,

 

Why kill them when we can starve them?

 

These proposals by Roosevelt were acclaimed by our Press but it soon became evident that the people in the U.S.A. were not going to be drawn into another European war and that Roosevelt would find it very difficult to get the Neutrality Law altered so that he could if he chose supply munitions to one side and not to the other, thus putting into the hands of the President the decision of Peace or War.

 

It was obvious that Germany and Italy could not continue to ignore the feverish preparations for war in Great Britain, France and the U.S.A., and consequently two dramatic events took place, one quickly following on the other.

 

Slovakia separated herself from Czechoslovakia, claiming independence. The Czech Government, faced by internal revolution, asked Germany to intervene and Germany occupied Bohemia and Moravia incorporating them as a Protectorate in the Reich. It was impossible any longer to tolerate this promontory penetrating deep into Germany and governed by people who were largely communistic and hostile to Germany, an area which French military authorities had openly stated would be used as a base for bombing planes, aiming at destroying the cities of Germany.

 

It was evident from the replies made by Mr. Chamberlain and Lord Halifax that they did not regard the occupation of Bohemia and Moravia as a matter affecting our interests, as, owing to the break away of Slovakia, Czechoslovakia had ceased to exist and an occupation by German troops made at the request of the Czech Government could hardly be described as an act of military aggression.

 

[Page 169]

 

Then the storm cloud, organised by those working for war, burst and has swept the Government like helpless logs in its torrent towards war. The public excitement was increased by the publication in the London Press of a message purporting to come from Rumania — but now believed to have been concocted in London — to the effect that Germany had threatened Rumania with war if she did not give her a complete monopoly of all her external trade.

 

The British Ambassador in Berlin was instructed to lodge a protest with the German Government, and to tear up the Peace Pact signed by Herr Hitler and Mr. Chamberlain.

 

This was followed later by the occupation of Albania by Italy thus securing the Adriatic from the hostile fleets of England and France bombarding Italian towns.

 

According to Mr. Chamberlain these two necessary acts of self defence filled the whole world with “horror. I have been young and now am old and in my lifetime I have seen Great Britain wage war after war to “extend the Empire. It is not for us, satiated with conquest, and oppressing today by force the Arabs in Palestine — a country in which we are interlopers, and which incidentally occupies a strategic position on the Mediterranean, — to criticise the actions of other nations.

 

These two inevitable acts were received quite calmly in Europe but were made the excuse for a fresh campaign here and in the States in which it was stated that Germany and Italy meant to invade and annex all the small nations in Europe as a preliminary to world conquest, and our Press arranged for alarmist messages from every capital in Europe. An imaginary crisis was created and the enemies of Chamberlain gathered their forces to turn him out of office. Churchill, Eden, and their friends worked night and day to organise a revolt in the Conservative Party, and Fleet Street said he would not remain in power for another week. If he fell Eden, who cannot speak without showing his insolent attitude to the German people, Churchill and their friends would form a government.

 

Chamberlain saved himself by his speech in Birmingham attacking Hitler, and by proposing to resuscitate the old plan which he had only a year ago condemned as unworkable — a coalition of the small nations in Europe against Germany.

 

[Page 170]

 

Without waiting to be asked, we promised Poland to defend her if Germany attacked her independence, went round Europe trying to draw the small nations into a combination against Germany, and approached the Soviet for the same purpose. When Italy occupied Albania, we hastened to offer Greece and Albania our defence if their independance was attacked. The response to these efforts has been very remarkable. Ten nations in addition to France and Italy, are in contact with the German frontier. Of these Belgium is guaranteed by England France and Germany. Of the other nine, only Poland has accepted. The other eight have declined our offer of protection, saying they have no cause for alarm, and in addition, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Estonia and Bulgaria stand aloof. A Norwegian Minister speaking the other day, declared that for three hundred years, the Scandinavian countries have been fighting with England for the right to maintain their neutrality. Rumania and Greece have thanked us for our offer to defend them, but have explained that they have no intention of entering into a reciprocal treaty and only Portugal, Poland and Turkey, have agreed to a mutually defensive treaty. Rumania has been rewarded with a loan of five million pounds, for graciously allowing us to defend her. The Soviet in spite of our beseeching attitude has so far not come to any agreement with us. The part they will play if war should come, is that of the jackal feasting on the corpses of the slain.

 

All we have done is to present Hitler with a splendid testimonial from the small nations in Europe.

 

Just as we were forced by the “City to crush the small independant Boer Republic in order to gain control of the gold mines, so the real reason why we are interfering in Poland, Rumania and Greece, is that our financiers have large interests in the Polish coal mines, where the miners wages are disgracefully low, Rumanian oil and Greek banking. A pipe line runs from the oil fields of poverty stricken Rumania to the city of London, pouring the wealth of that country into the pockets of our financiers. They are determined that Germany be warned off these countries, where they have established a monopoly of financial control. The British public are deceived by the cry:

 

Defend the independance of small nations.

 

[Page 171]

 

The attempt we are making to persuade the Soviet to invade Europe pouring in hordes of barbaric troops from European and Asiatic Russia, whose advance would be accompanied by Communist risings and massacres, is probably the greatest crime against Christianity and civilization in the history of Europe.

 

By following this extraordinary foreign policy our Government has sinned against four principles which should govern the foreign policy of nations.

 

No Government has the right to pledge the lives of the people, except in self defence or defence of a vital interest. The inclusion of Bohemia in the Reich touches no interest of ours.

 

No Government has a right to hand the control of its foreign policy to another nation or nations. Let us suppose, for instance, that Greece quarrelled with Italy and they went to war; we are bound to fight for Greece whether she is right or wrong.

 

The following quotation from a speech made by Captain Euan Wallace, Minister of Transport, at Bognor, condemns the government foreign policy out of their own mouths.

 

Let us make no mistake about it, the decision whether we will fight has been taken out of the hands of the people of this country, and out of the hands of our governors. We have made commitments which are automatic. If those commitments are broken, this country is committed for better or for worse to take up arms.

 

It is the duty of a Government to reduce outside commitments which may lead to war, and to secure the friendship of all nations. Our Government has increased our commitments which may lead to war, and by this action caused the Peace Pact and the Naval Treaty with Germany to be torn up. We had’ torn up the Peace Pact and Germany has now quite reasonably denounced the Naval Pact which was of great value to us.

 

The final result of our action has been that Hitler is freed from his Peace Treaty with Poland and any restraint in strengthening his navy, so that he is left with a distinct diplomatic gain by our action.

 

No Government has the right to lure a nation into war with a third nation if they cannot fulfil their offers of help. If Poland, having accepted our advances, makes war on Germany, we could not by any possibility go to her assistance.

 

[Page 172]

 

As the Fuhrer pointed out in his speech on April 28, 1939, when he first signed a Peace Pact with Poland he made no objections to the existing “Mutual Security Treaty with France; but for Poland, having signed the Peace Pact, to make a treaty with Great Britain undertaking to make war on Germany under certain conditions, is an obvious breach of the Peace Pact.

 

What does Poland imagine she gains by this move? The Polish Corridor is an injustice to Germany and many people are astonished that she has put up with it so long. Danzig is as much a German city as Liverpool is English. Suppose we had lost the War and Germany had given Liverpool to De Valera? How long would we have tolerated that state of affairs?

 

Hitler made the Peace Pact with Poland and has faithfully observed it. Now they have broken it he is free to take back the Polish Corridor and include Danzig in the Reich. If Poland imagines that she can drag England into a war with Germany about Danzig she is greatly mistaken. Our Government has been careful to guard themselves on that point. Supposing Poland declares war and does manage to bring us in it will not save her. We are as helpless to save her as if she was on the Planet Mars. For us to tempt her to make such a suicidal war is an act of mischief deliberately disturbing the Peace of Europe.

 

Roosevelt who hopes for a third term of office in spite of having landed the U.S.A. with a huge internal debt and 20 millions people on the dole, was looking out for a good slogan and thought that a call to the Democracies to defend “Christianity, Democracy and International Good Faith would do.

 

He has had to retreat, and has thrown out a smoke screen to hide his retreat by sending to the World Press and Hitler and Mussolini an absurd document, in which they are told to pledge themselves to Peace for 25 years with a long list of nations, and then hand their future over to a world congress controlled by the three Democracies who were responsible for the Treaty of Versailles. This has been hailed as a wonderful document by the Governments of Great Britain and France.

 

[Page 173]

 

In the meantime Peace among the nations of the Danube Basin and of the Balkans is being assured by Hitler and Mussolini, who are having conference with the various Prime Ministers and Foreign Secretaries. There are three dangers to Peace, the territorial demands of Hungary and of Bulgaria, and the trouble with the Croatians, but with the friendly assistance of Germany and Italy both nations will doubtless be able to come to terms with their neighbours.

 

These nations are all centering round the Axis because it will give them the three things which the people of Europe most desire, — Peace, ordered stable Government, and trade.

 

The Totalitarian States stand for certain fundamental principles:

 

* Peace among the nations, each following out its own economic life.

* Government with only one object — the good of the people, instead of being used for the struggle for power of rival political Parties.

* The abolition of Politicians.

* The abolition of the use of the Press controlled by financial groups to promote war by spreading lies.

* A higher conception of the relation of the individual to the community, which is not merely negative — the obeying of the law — but positive, — the service of the community being the first duty.

* A stable economic and financial system and work for all.

* Freedom from control by international finance.

* Arms for defence but not for attack.

 

 

It is obvious that the European nations are grouping themselves in friendly alliance round the Axis and it is time we recognised that fact and accepted the friendship which has been offered us by Germany and Italy.

 

It is also time that France, for long under the influence of our foreign office with its pernicious traditions, reversed her policy and made friends with her neighbours who have no quarrel with her, settled the quite reasonable demands of Italy, and developed trade with the three countries on her frontiers.

 

Why should France sacrifice so much because we choose to quarrel with Germany?

 

[Page 174]

 

There will probably be no war in Europe because Hitler and Mussolini stand for Peace.

 

The Europeans are settling down to a long Peace, which clears the deck for the larger question of World Trade and the huge monopoly of Gold, Raw materials and tropical and sub-tropical products held by the three Democracies and the Soviet.

 

In every speech Hitler and Mussolini have given warning on this matter and they not only represent the needs of themselves and Japan but many other nations.

 

This of course is what Roosevelt is really thinking about. He is prepared to plunge into a World War to defend Monopoly in the name of “Christianity, Democracy and Good Faith.

 

The power of the Monopolists is colossal. They possess the world’s wealth, rule a great part of the world’s population, and have at their command our overwhelming sea power, which enables them to control trade on the high seas, and as we have seen, Roosevelt has already proposed that a trade boycott force the Have Nots into submission.

 

It is really for this reason that Germany is seeking to develop trade on the old trade route from Asia to Europe and it is for this reason that we are trying to prevent it.

 

While in Parliament the Government talk about small nationalities, the Conservative Party organisation through its political instructors is telling us that we do not care what happens to small nationalities, but we must stop the development of Germany’s trade in the Danube Basin and the Balkans so as to be able to starve her out by a blockade. It is obviously not only in the interest of the Have Nots, but of the whole world and even of the Monopolists themselves that the trade of the world be set free. Strangely enough the Monopolists are suffering most from their own policy having huge armies of unemployed.

 

The British Empire when it was a Free Trade Empire had the goodwill of all the world. To-day when it has surrounded itself with tariffs, Ottawa agreements, quotas and international restrictions on output, it no longer has that goodwill which was its real strength, and piling armaments on armaments is not the solution of the question.

 

[Page 175]

 

Not so important but of great interest is the Gold monopoly, a monopoly not only of the Gold available but the world’s Gold mines which the Monopolists share with the Soviet.

 

The U.S.A. is still hoarding larger and larger quantities of Gold. It does not seem to occur to her economists that to exchange goods for Gold, which is buried in their Bank Vaults and is “sterilized to use the Stock Exchange jargon, is to give away their goods for nothing. Trade is the exchange of goods which have a utility value for other goods which have a utility value, and sterilized gold has no utility value at all.

 

As long as Gold is still regarded as wealth by the mass of mankind, it is thought necessary for a trading nation to have a Gold reserve, but Germany — deprived by her creditors of all her Gold — has challenged that idea and is building up an export trade without it and is to-day our largest customer.

 

Germany has not only challenged the political system of the Democracies but the economic system of international finance and international monopolies, and it is to that challenge that all the attacks in the Press and the attempts to force the people of this country into war are due.

 

If Germany succeeds in her economic system of basing her currency on labour values and exchanging goods for goods, the whole of the Gold stored in the Bank vaults of the U.S.A. can be written off as a dead loss, and Gold mining which depends on selling Gold at a higher and higher price to the Governments who buy the Gold bars and do nothing with them, will collapse. The old story of King Midas who starved because everything he touched turned to Gold will come true.

 

The German Government has shown that Gold is not necessary and that is one of the reasons for the policy pursued against them by Great Britain, France and the U.S.A. Millions are being spent on this propaganda, but when once the peoples of Great Britain, France and the U.S.A. realise that the cry that Germany aims at universal dominion is a lie to-day just as it was a lie in 1914; that the only danger facing Democracy is its own misrule, weakness in the face of vested interests and sacrifice of public interest to the greedy scramble of politicians for power; that they are being driven like sheep to the slaughter by big finance just as they were driven into the Boer war, they will turn in revolt. The revolt has already begun in England though not reported by our Press.

 

[Page 176]

 

Germany has symbolized international finance by calling it “the Jew. It is true Jews are to a great extent interested. International finance is the public enemy and the promoter of war among the peoples, but those controlling it belong to all nations, and it is centred in London, Paris and New York. The “City rules this country. They threw the Labour Party out of power when it suited them, and they control our Government today. When Roosevelt and our Government say they are willing to consider how to set free the supply of raw materials they are promising what they cannot perform as they are helpless in the grip of the huge combines. Only the Totalitarian States are free states. King Midas is the Public Enemy number one.

 

While the Monopolists combine to accumulate Gold it is no longer the basis of their paper currency. We have ourselves abolished the ratio between Gold and paper, and France devalues the Franc at intervals. The confusion between the world currencies continues and will end in a collapse. The only sound currency to-day is the German currency.

 

It is also necessary for the world to return in some form or other to Free Trade, but it must be a Free Trade that does not cause a competition between different standards of living. Germany has solved these problems by exchanging goods for goods based on barter.

 

Before these international questions are discussed the Monopolists have to ask themselves why, with the world wealth in their possession, they suffer from serious unemployment, which has reached in the U.S.A. the appalling figure of 20 million people on the dole, while Germany has to hire surplus labour abroad. They must reform their own economic system before they reform the world.

 

They have also to ask themselves two very fundamental questions, namely, is it possible to combine the Democratic idea with the principle that the first duty of the citizen is the welfare of the community, and with honest government not controlled behind the scenes by the Financiers.

 

Democracies are in many cases financially corrupt Governments. In our case that is not true but our Government and Parliament are intellectually dishonest.

 

[Page 177]

 

Truth is sacrificed every day to a party advantage. If lies were only consciously told it would not be so serious but political life produces a mental degeneration in which it is no longer possible for the politicians to distinguish between truth and falsehood.

 

An excellent example occurred in the House of Commons the other day when the leaders of the Opposition accused Franco of dropping from his planes chocolate boxes containing infernal machines so that when children picked them up they were blown to pieces. Men who can say such things are really mentally insane and these champions of Democracy are our rulers to whom we submit the safety of our State.

 

The Parliamentary system is becoming unworkable. The Peoples of the Democracies, owing to the iron control of publicity, are dumb and can be driven to war without a protest. Even a pig is allowed to squeal before he is killed.

 

We shall owe to Germany not only the abolition of the Politician, but a new ethical conception of a community, Peace in Europe and a reformed economic and trading system which will reconstruct world economics and abolish the evil influences of international finance and huge trading monopolies.

 

The great speech made by the Fuhrer has deflated the war balloon blown out with poison gas by the Press. Germany makes no threat of war against any nation. The war anxiety among the small nations of Europe is not due to German action but to the uncertainty as to whether we do not intend to provoke war and the fear of our hysterical and unbalanced Democracy, for they know that Great Britain is dangerous when she is filled with moral indignation at the sins of her neighbours. When the giants are fighting the small nations will suffer.

 

It is true Holland is busy arming her frontier facing Germany but she is just as busy arming her harbours facing England. France is evidently hesitating between Peace, Trade and friendship with Germany and being further involved in our reckless foreign policy. It is said that our beginning of conscription is the price we are paying to keep her with us.

 

Before finally considering the two policies put before the peoples of Europe and the peoples of this country by the Fuhrer and the British Government respectively, let us briefly look at the present condition of Europe as revealed by our attempts to consolidate it in a new policy against Germany.

 

[Page 178]

 

Switzerland, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania deny that they fear any act aggression on the part of Germany, refuse to be drawn into any alliance that may commit them to war, and state that if war comes they will remain neutral.

 

Germany, Italy, Spain, Slovakia, Hungary and Jugoslavia are united in the closest bonds of friendship and mutual confidence. Rumania and Greece, while not refusing our offer of assistance if attacked, will not sign a Treaty which will in any way commit them to war.

 

A chain of Peace Pacts beginning in Italy joins Italy to Jugoslavia, Jugoslavia to Bulgaria, Bulgaria to Turkey.

 

Poland alone has formed a mutual security pact with us, and by so doing broken her Peace Pact with Germany.

 

France is isolated in Europe to-day and has chosen to quarrel with her three neighbours on her frontiers — Spain, Italy and Germany. This attitude of hostility can be ended when she chooses, and grants the quite reasonable requests of Italy.

 

Before Hitler rose to power all countries in Europe had armed and a criss-cross of mutual security pacts made war possible and no one could say where it would stop. Since Germany rose to power the consolidation of Europe into friendly nations promoting trade has proceeded apace. A central area of Europe from the frontiers of Holland to the frontiers of Rumania, and united to Italy and Spain is settled as a permanent area of Peace, — an area equal to the old Austrian Empire and united to Germany by friendship not by dominance of a central Government. If Germany and Italy acting jointly are able to settle the differences about land frontiers between Hungary and Rumania, this will extend to the Black Sea.

 

Formerly Poland could be included. Unfortunately for her she has broken away owing to our interference. This Pax Germanica which is gradually extending over Europe is the work of two men — Hitler and Mussolini.

 

Let us now consider the two policies offered by Hitler on the one hand and our Government on the other.

 

[Page 179]

 

To Hitler we owe the idea of Peace Pacts. Two nations agree not to go to war for a term of years. This does not involve any alliance against a third Power. This policy has spread over Europe and into Asia. Turkey, Iraq, Persia and Afghanistan are united by Peace Pacts.

 

The first Peace Pact between Germany and Poland resulted in the friendly settlement of very delicate and difficult points and it is disastrous for her that Poland has broken it.

 

The other policy of mutual security pacts is simply the Policy of Treaties between two nations directed against a third nation under a new name which existed before the war and had such disastrous consequences. Germany was bound to Austria, England was bound to France, and France to Russia, and so an insignificant Balkan war involved all Europe in a catastrophe.

 

This policy was tried during the reign of the League and produced unrest and fear of war all over Europe. It means the assumption by a nation of obligations to fight for a foreign policy over which it has no control, and it ensures automatically a local war between two powers involving all those linked by mutual security pacts. A break at any point in the complicated chain involves the whole in disaster. It means dividing Europe into two hostile camps, which must end in war sooner or later.

 

Hitler has always denounced mutual security and Germany beyond her guarantee of the integrity of Belgium and of Slovakia is free from all such commitments. Our alliance with France has been disastrous to both countries as neither country is free to follow the foreign policy suited to its own interests. It is, for instance, essential for France to-day to develop friendly relations with Spain and Italy, and above all with Germany. Many intelligent French men curse the alliance with us dragging France into our disastrous and reckless Foreign Policy.

 

The peoples of Europe, of Great Britain and the British Empire have the chance of adopting the policy of Hitler and Peace, or of Chamberlain who is being driven by forces hostile to Germany to war. I thank God that the Peace of Europe is in the guardianship of the Fuhrer and therefore, in spite of the frantic efforts of all those here and in Europe and America who want war, secure.

 

——————————————–

 

Printed by M. Milller & Sohn, Berlin S.W. 68

 

 

 

 

 

======================================

 

 

PDF of Part 1. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 1
PDF of Part 2. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 2
PDF of Part 3. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 3
PDF of Part 4. Click to download  (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 4
PDF of Part 5. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 5

PDF of Part 6. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 6

PDF of Part 7. Click to download  (0.6 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 7

PDF of Part 8. Click to download (0.6 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 8
PDF of Part 9. Click to download (0.6 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 9
PDF of this post. Click to download (0.6 MB). >>The Case for Germany – Part 10 (last)
Complete book (clean text PDF). Click to view or download (1.5MB). >>The Case for Germany by A P Laurie (1939)

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2: May 30, 2017 — Improved formatting.

 

Version 1: Published Oct 5, 2014
Posted in Bk - The Case for Germany, Germany, Hitler Youth, International Finance, Jews, National Socialism, Propaganda - Anti-German, Revisionism, The International Jew, Third Reich, White Nationalism | Leave a comment

The Case for Germany – Part 9 – German Colonies; The Labour Front

 The Case for Germany - Cover Ver 2

[Part 9]

 

 

 

I am deeply stirred by the word which Ulrich Hutten wrote the last time he seized his pen: — Germany.

ADOLF HITLER

January 30th, 1937

 

 

 

The Case for Germany 

 

A Study of Modern Germany 

 

by

A. P. Laurie

M. A. Cantab., D. Sc., LL. D. Edin., F. C. S., F. R. S. E.

With a Preface by Admiral Sir Barry Domvile

K. B. E., C. B., C. M. G.

Berlin W 15

Internationaler Verlag

1939

FIRST EDITION ………… JUNE 1939

SECOND EDITION ……. JULY 1939

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

PRINTED IN GERMANY

DEDICATION

It is with admiration and gratitude for the great work he has done for the German people that I dedicate this book to the Fuhrer.

A. P. L.

TO THE READER

There are two sides to every question. You have read one side in our Press for six years.

This book gives the other side.

A. P. L.

 Artur Pillians Laurie

PREFACE

 

It is a great pleasure to me to introduce the public to Dr. Laurie’s valuable book on modern Germany. He is best known to the world as a brilliant scientist, but he has found time in the intervals of his work to pursue with ardour the task upon which every sensible member of the British and German races should be engaged — namely the establishment of good relations and a better understanding between these two great nations.

Dr Laurie knows full well that this friendship is the keystone to peace in Europe — nay, in the whole world.

He is one of the small group who founded the Association known as “The Link”, whose sole aim is to get Britons and Germans to know and understand one another better. He is one of the most zealous workers in this good cause in the country.

He writes of the National Socialist movement with knowledge and great sympathy.

The particular value of this book lies in the fact that it is written by a foreigner, who cannot be accused of patriotic excess in his interpretation of the great work done by Herr Hitler and his associates. I recommend this volume with confidence to all people who are genuinely impressed with the desire to understand one of the greatest — and most bloodless — revolutions in history.

BARRY DOMVILE

Robin’s Tree

8th May 1939.

 

 

“As we advance in our social knowledge, we shall endeavour to make our governments paternal as well as judicial; that is, to establish such laws and authorities as may at once direct us in our occupations, protect us against our follies, and visit us in our distresses; a government which shall repress dishonesty, as now it punishes theft; which shall show how the discipline of the masses may be brought to aid the toils of peace, as the discipline of the masses has hitherto knit the sinews of battle; a government which shall have its soldiers of the ploughshare as well as its soldiers of the sword, and which shall distribute more proudly its golden crosses of industry — golden as the glow of the harvest — than it now grants its bronze crosses of honour — bronzed with the crimson of blood.

RUSKIN. Political Economy of Art.

 

 

“All front fighters fought side by side and went through an inferno. They are all comparable to the heroes of the ancient world. It was the manhood of the nations in their prime who fought and experienced the horrors of modern war.

In another war the flower of the nations’ men and women will have to fight. Europe will be destroyed if the best in all of the nations are wiped out. A new conflict will exceed even the ghastly tragedies of the Great War.

I believe that those who rattle the sabres have not participated in war. I know that war veterans speak and think differently.

They energetically desire to prevent another conflict. I hope that the men who are standing before me can contribute to preserve the peace of the world — a peace of honour and equality for all.

Let us not talk of prestige as between the victors and the defeated. This is my one request: Forget what has divided the nations before and remember that history has advanced.”

Field Marshal GOERING addressing the British

and German war veterans.

 

 

CONTENTS

 

CHAPTER ……………………………………………………………. PAGE

 

Dedication

To the Reader

Preface

Field Marshall Goering’s Address

I.   DER FUHRER ……………………………………………………….. 11

II.   THE BELEAGUERED CITY ……………………………………. 21

III.   NATIONAL SOCIALISM ……………………………………… 25

IV.   THE NAZI RALLYS AT NUREMBERG ……………………. 34

V.   THE FOREIGN POLICY OF GERMANY ……………………. 41

VI.   ENGLAND AND GERMANY ………………………………….. 49

VII.   MARCH 7th, A MOST IMPORTANT DATE …………… 54

VIII.   THE REAL ENEMY OF EUROPE ……………………….. 58

IX.   COMMUNISM VERSUS NATIONAL SOCIALISM …… 62

X.   THE UNION OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE …………………. 68

XI.   ACTS OF “AGGRESSION” BY GERMANY ……………… 79

XII.   THE DANCE OF DEATH ……………………………………… 85

XIII.   OUR FUTURE POLICY TOWARDS GERMANY ……. 93

XIV.   THE HITLER YOUTH MOVEMENT ……………………… 100

XV.   THE WINTER HELP ORGANIZATION ………………….. 104

XVI.   NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND THE PROTESTANT

CHURCH ……………………………………………………………………… 109

XVII. ECONOMICS …………………………………………………….. 118

XVIII. THE FOUR YEARS PLAN …………………………………… 138

XIX.   THE GERMAN COLONIES …………………………………. 141

XX.   THE LABOUR FRONT ………………………………………….. 146

XXI.   AGRICULTURE …………………………………………………. 155

XXII. MUNICH AND AFTER ………………………………………… 167

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter Nineteen

 

THE GERMAN COLONIES

 

 

 

Before the war Germany possessed Tanganyika, Togoland, the Cameroons, Ruanda Urundi, S.W. Africa, Samoa, New Guinea, Nauru, and some small South Sea Islands. As part of the Treaty of Versailles these colonies were all taken from her, and handed over for administration under mandates for the League of Nations. Nothing was settled about their ultimate fate and involved legal discussions have arisen as to whether or no the League can return them to Germany, These discussions are merely obstructive as there can be no question that if we, for instance, asked the League to restore the mandated colonies, the League would do so.

The administration of Tanganyika and Togoland was transferred to Great Britain, Ruanda Urundi to Belgium, S.W. Africa to South Africa, the Cameroons to Great Britain and France, Samoa to New Zealand, Nauru to Australia and the smaller islands to Japan.

In order to queer the pitch libellous attacks, which have no foundation in fact, have been made on the German administration of these colonies. They have had their Colonial wars with the natives but so have we, and if there is to be a general washing of dirty linen about Africa and digging into past records, no country which has possessions there will be left with a shred of reputation.

Impartial investigators have stated that their administration was efficient and humane, and in fact they were with the usual German thoroughness developing the natural resources of their colonies more rapidly than we do.

Some colonies were captured during the war, others handed over under the Peace Treaty.

[Page 142]

President Wilson demanded that a free and open minded and absolutely impartial adjustment of all colonial claims should be made in the Peace Treaty, and it was relying on President Wilson’s promise that the German Nation laid down its arms. The reason given for depriving her of all her colonies in the Treaty of Versailles was “the use to which these colonies were put as a base from which to prey on the commerce of the World and Germany’s inability to administer her colonies”. The first part of this statement must refer to the fact that the Emden made a perfectly legitimate use of the colonies, when engaged in legitimate attacks carried out with the utmost humanity on the commerce of the allies, and the second part of the statement is absurd. Germany was developing her colonial possessions with harbours, roads and railways and laying the foundation for a prosperous future with an organized effort beyond that of other countries.

It has been argued that the total output of the German Colonies for export is so pitiful, amounting to about £6,000,000 a year, that the claim that it will have any real benefit on Germany’s financial position is absurd.

There is more than one reply to that. As we have seen Germany’s financial policy compelled on her by her foreign debts, and absence of a Gold reserve and large proportion of exports devoted to paying interest, makes it impossible for her to maintain her exchange and yet buy freely abroad. The return of her colonies would enable her to obtain more raw materials within her own system of exchange, and so retrieve her position as a customer in the world’s market.

While the gross values are small the actual imports as can be seen by the following table cover the whole or a large part of Germany’s demand for certain colonial products.

During the time she possessed the colonies she was engaged in development work, which has practically come to a standstill.

It is impossible to judge of the final output of produce from these colonies by what was being obtained before the war. The experiment has yet to be tried of testing the capacity for output of these tropical and sub-tropical countries under an active programme and scientific administration and research.

[Page 143]

The revolution made by the Dutch in the production of sugar in Java is a case in point. The Dutch, after a prolonged research, have produced a sugar cane suitable for Java with three times the yield of any other sugar cane. We and France have neglected systematic scientific research on the possibilities of our colonies or conducted it on no systematic plan with grossly inadequate funds. We may be sure that this will not be the German policy.

It is obvious from my account of the present monopoly of raw materials that it is impossible to refuse all consideration to Germany with its large growing and vigorous population in one small area in Europe. Far from denying her limited demands for the return of her former colonies, which while assisting her commercially will not give an outlet to her population, we should strive within our vast Empire to give her other opportunities.

We have on the one hand a vast undeveloped Empire, and Germany a vigorous and growing population. If we could persuade our foreign office to cease carping at Germany, there are infinite possibilities between the two nations similar in blood, and closely allied in friendship, for developing the neglected and thinly populated British estate.

Germany has sprung from the war and the terrible Peace with a renewed vigour, strengthened by suffering and like all vigorous people is increasing in population. We each have qualities which combined can give strength. Let us solve not only European problems but World problems together.

The German colonies produce a wide variety of foodstuffs and raw materials. The exports from Tanganyika in 1935 amounted to £3 – 4 millions sterling, consisting of coffee, cotton, sisal fibre, peanuts, rice and copra. South West Africa is a cattle country, but has also proved a good breeding ground for karakul sheep supplying the Persian lamb skins. There are also diamond deposits. The exports have therefore fluctuated considerably according to whether demands have been reduced or no. Her total exports in 1935 amounted to £2,5 millions sterling.

Ruanda Urundi exports hides, cotton, coffee and tin are £272,000.

The Cameroons produce cacao, palm kernels and palm oil. The total exports amounted in 1935 to £1,3 millions sterling.

[Page 144]

In the British section the cultivation of bananas on a large scale has rapidly increased owing to the enterprise of Germans who bought back their plantations after the war. In 1935 45,000 tons were exported.

Togo exports cacao, palm oil and palm nuts, and copra, the total exports amounting in 1935 to £490,000.

New Guinea exported copra and gold to the value of £2,3 millions in 1935. Samoa exports copra, the exports for 1935 being £127,000.

The island of Nauru contains many valuable phosphate deposits the export value of which in 1935 was £474,000.

The other small South Sea islands mandated to Japan also produce phosphates and the Japanese have introduced the cultivation of sugar. Total exports of the islands £1,1 million.

The total figure of the exports is not large but the actual amounts exported is in many cases, such as cacao, sufficient to supply the whole German demand. It is not a fair comparison to compare that total with the total of the whole of her export trade.

It must also be remembered that from 1914 to the present time no attempt has been made to develop their territory on scientific lines, and little or nothing done to make roads. The — potential wealth of these colonies is enormous if they are developed on a basis of scientific research. This could be done by Germany and judging by past experience will never be done by us. The difference is between Great Britain with such a large garden that most of it grows weeds and it is hardly anywhere cultivated on scientific lines, and Germany with her small allotment to which she will apply intensive cultivation.

It would pay the British Empire to return German East Africa to Germany, as it would become a laboratory providing invaluable data for the cultivation of vast areas in the world with similar climatic conditions.

One of the most curious objections to returning the German colonies, is that all such colonies are a burden and an expense, and more trouble than they were worth. Then why, said Hitler, not allow us to relieve you of these burdens? The reply was strategic reasons, a reply which is meaningless with a German fleet one third the size of ours.

[Page 145]

There will probably be difficulties in returning territories mandated to the Dominions, but I suggest as an experiment we return in the meantime German East Africa.

In considering the whole of the area of Africa including the Congo Basin and Tanganyika, it is apt to be forgotten that these vast areas were first under an International Committee in 1885, which still exists and last met in 1919. Among other regulations the region has to offer equal facilities of trade to all Nations. The meeting held in 1919 specially excluded Germany from the privilege but I am told it has never been enforced. Germany ought to be invited to become a member of the Commission and a meeting called to consider the whole question of the future of this area.

[Page 146]

 

 

 

 

Chapter Twenty

 

THE LABOUR FRONT

 

 

To imagine that when we speak of the Trades Unions in Germany before National Socialism we are speaking of organisations which were the same as our Trades Unions in this country, is to misread the whole situation that existed in 1933.

There are three organisations in this country which the wage earning class have built up for themselves, — the Friendly Societies, the Trades Unions and the Co-operative Societies. The Trades Unions, built up through years of struggle when they were illegal institutions, have become part of the recognised organisations of Labour in this country and in some cases a complete scheme for dealing with the problems which arise between Labour and Capital has been developed like that which exists in our railways, with the Trades Unions, the employers organisation and the railway board as final arbiters. It is also necessary to remember that the Trades Unions not only represent the organised workers in labour disputes but are also benefit societies.

There is no necessary connection between Trades Unionism and Socialism. There is no reason why a Trades Union secretary should not be a member of the Primrose League and walk on to the platform of the congress with a primrose in his buttonhole, except that it is one of the things which is not done. To-day he is expected to be a member of the Labour Party and accept without question the pale pink brand of Socialism produced by the Bureaucratic mind, the mere thought of which makes a genuine Communist vomit.

[Page 147]

The Socialist resolutions passed every year by the T.U.C. do no harm to anyone, and do not produce the mildest flutter on the Stock Exchange. Every man voting for them is more or less a Capitalist, the Trades Unions themselves have their funds well invested, the Friendly Societies and the Co-operative Societies have hundreds of millions of invested capital. Harcourt once said we are all Socialists now. He might as well have said we are all Capitalists now.

Keir Hardie did the workman a bad turn when he persuaded the Trades Unions to hoist the banner embroidered by the fair hands of Mrs. Webb, but he secured ample funds for the political organisation.

Both the Liberal and the Conservative Parties can claim credit for the advance in social conditions in this country. Only one Party is absolutely sterile and for this reason, that they have adopted a dogma of foreign origin, a patent medicine to cure all social ills, and the Englishman rightly distrusts cure ails and suspects a neatly logical system because he instinctively distrusts logic outside the Book of Euclid.

The marriage of Trades Unionism to Socialism has been an unfortunate marriage for the workman, but it has not wrecked the Trades Union organisation.

If we now study the Trades Unionism in Germany before 1933, we find the Trades Unions run by political adventurers, entirely absorbed in politics, riddled with Communism, hopelessly in debt, and with an income insufficient to pay the official salaries. It was necessary in the interests of the German workman to sweep away the whole rotten system by which he was being exploited.

It is forgotten that Hitler as a youth and young man lived in great poverty picking up casual labour in Vienna, and he had the inestimable advantage of studying international socialism and communism from the inside, a victim with an intelligent and critical mind. He found out two things in Vienna, — one that the class war leads nowhere, the other that the only people who made money out of the class war were the Jews.

He himself, one of the workers and one of the victims, had long thought out his solution when he ordered his followers to take over the Trades Union organisation, to dismiss the official parasites, and organise in its place the Labour Front, which took over the liabilities of the old Trades Unions and secured for the old members the benefits for which they had paid the money which had been squandered. Quite apart from National Socialism, the Trades Unions were rotten, were bankrupt and something had to be done in the interests of the working man.

[Page 148]

The central idea of the Labour Front is an organisation of industry workshop by workshop, in which all those employed in production including the employer and employed are in one organisation with the object of honest production for the good of the German people. Your interests, said Hitler, are not divided, they are the same. While you quarrel over the share of the payment for production, production itself ceases. He determined to replace the economic system of the 19th century, under which labour is bought as a ton of coal is bought and the employer admits no responsibility to the worker, and the State has to intervene at every stage to protect his health and life, by the ideas permeating the old mediaeval guilds. Production was to become human instead of inhuman. We look back with horror upon the exploitation of child labour in the middle of the 19th century.

Karl Marx and Hitler were equally horrified by the inhuman exploitation of the 19th century, but Karl Marx a journalist, saw it from the outside. Hitler lived and suffered inside the system, and Karl Marx gave the world a message of hate, of spoilation, of a brutal materialism, while Hitler brought it a message of Peace and revival of the message of the gospel. You are all wrong, he cries to the revolutionary Socialists, your way is the way of death. The negative of evil must be driven out by the positive of good. We need an ethical idea with which to permeate the body politic. Lenin in his frenzy used to cry out for torrents of blood. He bathed in them before the end, and the Russian workman has got a new master, the Communist official.

He beat you with whips but I will beat you with scorpions.

Man moves forward by new ethical ideas or rather by the unfolding of the inner meaning of old ideas like the opening of a flower from its green case, petal after petal is displayed and each means a step upwards.

I do not deny that our English Socialism, though I believe it to be wrong on economic lines, is an ethical movement, but Continental Socialism is and has been a very different affair controlled by men lusting for power and exploiting labour for its own ends.

[Page 149]

The new organisation of labour is known as the Labour Front, which not only carries on the old benefits of the Trades Unions, and supplies them for half the subscription but has undertaken new activities in the “Strength through Joy” movement which we have never thought of in this country. It has also made universal the payment for holidays, which is based upon the National Socialist idea of the workman as a man with rights as a citizen of the German State, and not merely a penny-in-the-slot machine who is only to be paid when his wheels turn inside. If the T.U.C. instead of passing Socialist resolutions would take up the practical tasks of the Labour Front, they would find universal support in this country and double their membership.

Besides the Labour Front which contains to-day over 20,000,000 members, the National Socialist Government has passed an elaborate Labour Law which I shall make some attempt to describe, but before doing so deal with one of the main accusations against the National Socialist Government, — that they have forbidden strikes. Strikes are a form of war, and in the U.S.A. are frequently accompanied by actual warfare, and are destructive and ruinous to both parties and to the community. It took us a long time to recover from the blow to trade of the General Strike. I remember in the Coal Strike of 1921, the Miners Union called out the men at the pumps, thus destroying many millions of pounds of property on which their own living depended. At that time being head of the Technical College in Edinburgh, I wired for our mining students to return from their holidays and go straight to the Fife coal fields and man the pumps. In two days the water was under control, but the Government who had promised to send soldiers to protect the mines were of course not ready, so the mob of miners threw out our boys, the mines were flooded and millions of pounds of property destroyed, and after the strike was over the Fife miners had to wait six months before they could resume their work underground.

[Page 150]

I was violently abused by the Fife miners secretary who afterwards became Secretary for Scotland in the Labour Government for taking the side of the mine owners. I replied I have nothing to do with the quarrel between the miners and the mine owners. The mines do not belong either to the mine owners or the miners. They are my property as a member of the British Commonwealth and I have a right to protect my property, a sound National Socialist principle.

It must not be forgotten that while strikes are forbidden lock outs are also forbidden and it was a lock-out of the miners by the mine owners, before the Commission had reported, that caused the general strike.

If the dreams of the T.U.C. are fulfilled and we become a Socialist State one of the first acts of the State will be to abolish the Trades Unions and forbid strikes.

 

 

The Labour Law

 

The Labour Law is so utterly different from any Act of Parliament in its ideas and expression that it is difficult to follow an intelligible path through its intricate proposals.

In the first place there is the new constitution known as the confidential council in every factory. This body contains representatives from every section of the industry, the workman’s representatives being chosen by secret ballot from a list prepared in consultation with the Labour Front, a list for which certain qualifications are necessary such as that to be on the list, a workman must be over 25 and must have belonged to the establishment for a year, with not less than two years’ previous experience in a similar industry. The office of a member of the council is an honorary one, and the employer or manager is bound to give the council information necessary for carrying out their duties.

The employer or manager is responsible for the welfare of the workers and the council is to assist the employer in his duties with a view to increase the efficiency of the factory and to deal with any disputes arising between the employer and the employed. The members of the council must all belong to the Labour Front organisation.

[Page 151]

The majority of the council may lodge an appeal in writing to the “Labour Front” against any decision of the employer.

The voting list for members is drawn up by the employer and the chairman of the National Socialist cell organisation.

The “Labour Trustee” is a government official and appointed to supervise a group of factories; he has no connection with trade or industry.

The duties of the Labour Trustee are as follows: — They supervise the formation and operation of the confidential councils and give a decision in case of a dispute. They decide in cases of appeal by the council and may reverse a decision of an employer and issue the necessary ruling themselves.

The Labour Trustee decides respecting proposed dismissals. The employer is bound to give notice in writing of more than 9 dismissals out of a 100 employees, and more than 10% of dismissals over 100. The dismissals cannot take place until four weeks after the Labour Trustee has been notified. Establishment rules of hours and wages and grounds for dismissal without notice must be issued in writing by the employer to the work people.

The Labour Trustees may lay down guiding principles for each establishment and rules and general rates where minimum conditions of employment are needed, for the protection of the work people. The Labour Trustee has great powers over his district and can make rules to apply to the special conditions of that district.

The Labour Trustee appoints an advisory council of experts for the various branches of industry in his district for consultation on questions which are of a general nature or which involve a principle. Three fourths of the experts must be chosen from lists of individuals drawn up by the Labour Front.

Employers and members of the confidential councils shall be selected in equal numbers. One fourth of the members can be appointed by the Labour Trustee from suitable persons in the district. The Labour Trustee can appoint a committee of experts to advise in individual cases.

[Page 152]

 

 

The Labour Courts

 

If an employee is dismissed after one year’s employment in an establishment of not less than ten persons he may lodge a complaint with the Labour Court. The complaint must be accompanied by a report from the confidential council that the continuance of employment has been unsuccessfully raised by them.

If the Court decides the reversal of the dismissal it shall include in the sentence an amount of compensation if the employer refuses to revoke the dismissal. It will be noted that the employee is carefully guarded from wrongful dismissal. He has first an appeal to his own confidential council and then to the Labour Court.

 

 

Social Honour Courts

 

One of the most interesting ideas in the Labour Law is the Social Honour Court.

The idea of the Social Honour Court is that a person can harm the State by actions which are not illegal and that the employers and employees in a working community have responsibilities to each other, the works and the State. Offences under this category are as follows: — If an employer exploits his workmen, or abuses his authority, or is disobedient to instructions given by the Labour Trustee: If a member of the confidential council reveals without authority confidential information or technical or business secrets which have become known to him through his duties as a member of the confidential council: If an employee endangers industrial peace by maliciously provoking other employees, or if a confidential man interferes unduly in the conduct of the establishment, or continually disturbs the community spirit.

The Honour Court consists of an official of the judiciary appointed by the Federal Minister of Justice and the Federal Minister of Labour, as chairman, one leader of an establishment and one confidential man as assessors. These two are selected by the chairman from a list drawn up by the German Labour Front.

[Page 153]

The Honour Courts may impose a warning, a reprimand, a disciplinary fine, disqualification for the position of leader, or confidential man, and removal of the offender from his post.

Decisions on offences against social honour are given on the application of the Labour Trustee by an Honour Court established for each Labour Trustee’s district.

 

 

Strength through Joy

 

There must have been a time before the black cloud of industrialisation pouring from a million factory chimneys destroyed joy in life, when the people however poor they may have been had some communal pleasures. The folk songs, the peasant dancing, the beautiful peasant costumes worn on important occasions all indicate that such a time once existed.

The beauty of the buildings in our villages also show a people living in the land who had the capacity for appreciating and the pleasure in building the house and the Church. Mankind does not live by bread alone and this is the central idea of the “Strength through joy” organisation which is a branch of the Labour Front.

The movement has taken four directions. One is that the pleasures of the theatre, the concert hall and travel, even as far as Madeira could be put in the reach of all at a very small expenditure by the individual. Last year by means of the “Strength through joy” organisation 4,850,000 German work people attended theatres. Travelling companies that go from village to village have been organised, the theatres have agreed to give certain special performances at cheap prices, the whole movement has not only brought the theatre to every door but has proved profitable for the theatres themselves.

Excellent music is now also available and the German has always had a love for good music.

The organisation of travel during holidays at first confined to Germany is now being extended overseas and the organisation is now building its own ships for holiday excursions. Last year eleven million workers enjoyed travel in Germany and abroad through the organisation.

[Page 154]

The second side of their organisation is the development of music and dramatic societies and athletic clubs. All this of course would have been impossible by a central organisation. The fact is the “Strength through Joy” idea has caught on in Germany, and with a little guidance from headquarters the villages and the workshops are organising these things for themselves. Broadeasting is being used to transmit the best of their local efforts.

The third idea is improving factory conditions, not only by providing washing and bathing facilities and dining rooms, but by making the factories inside more pleasant places, and turning waste ground outside into gardens, and even converting the hideous dumps into things pleasant to look at. Factories in this country are often pleasant places and well equipped. Bryant and Mays in East London is surrounded by gardens and tennis grounds for their employees. But it is only necessary to penetrate the industrial quarters of Manchester, of the Five Towns, of Birmingham, or of Glasgow, to realise their appallingly dreary ugliness.

50,000,000 marks have been spent on improving the factories since the “Strength through Joy movement was started, and prizes are given for the most beautiful villages.

The fourth side is their very complete organisation of educational work.

The astounding success of this movement would never have been achieved, as I have said, by a central organisation alone. The people of Germany have grasped the idea of National Socialism and with a little direction and suggestions from headquarters are working out the practical application for themselves. Hitler is right when he says,

I represent to-day the German people more closely than any Prime Minister of a Democratic country.

The lightest touch on the wheel from the captain is all that is needed to steer the ship.

[Page 155]

 

 

======================================

 

PDF of Part 1. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 1
PDF of Part 2. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 2
PDF of Part 3. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 3
PDF of Part 4. Click to download  (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 4
PDF of Part 5. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 5

PDF of Part 6. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 6

PDF of Part 7. Click to download  (0.6 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 7

PDF of Part 8. Click to download (0.6 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 8
PDF of this post. Click to download (0.6 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 9

 

 

Version History

 

 

Version 1: Published Oct 3, 2014
Posted in Africa, Bk - The Case for Germany, Germany, Hitler Youth, International Finance, Jews, National Socialism, Propaganda - Anti-German, Revisionism, The International Jew, Third Reich, Treaty of Versailles, White Nationalism, WW I | 1 Comment

The Case for Germany – Part 8 – Economics: The Four Years Plan

 

[Part 8]

 

 

 

I am deeply stirred by the word which Ulrich Hutten wrote the last time he seized his pen: — Germany.

ADOLF HITLER

January 30th, 1937

 

 

 

The Case for Germany 

 

A Study of Modern Germany 

 

by

A. P. Laurie

M. A. Cantab., D. Sc., LL. D. Edin., F. C. S., F. R. S. E.

With a Preface by Admiral Sir Barry Domvile

K. B. E., C. B., C. M. G.

Berlin W 15

Internationaler Verlag

1939

FIRST EDITION ………… JUNE 1939

SECOND EDITION ……. JULY 1939

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

PRINTED IN GERMANY

DEDICATION

It is with admiration and gratitude for the great work he has done for the German people that I dedicate this book to the Fuhrer.

A. P. L.

TO THE READER

There are two sides to every question. You have read one side in our Press for six years.

This book gives the other side.

A. P. L.

 

PREFACE

 

It is a great pleasure to me to introduce the public to Dr. Laurie’s valuable book on modern Germany. He is best known to the world as a brilliant scientist, but he has found time in the intervals of his work to pursue with ardour the task upon which every sensible member of the British and German races should be engaged — namely the establishment of good relations and a better understanding between these two great nations.

Dr Laurie knows full well that this friendship is the keystone to peace in Europe — nay, in the whole world.

He is one of the small group who founded the Association known as “The Link”, whose sole aim is to get Britons and Germans to know and understand one another better. He is one of the most zealous workers in this good cause in the country.

He writes of the National Socialist movement with knowledge and great sympathy.

The particular value of this book lies in the fact that it is written by a foreigner, who cannot be accused of patriotic excess in his interpretation of the great work done by Herr Hitler and his associates. I recommend this volume with confidence to all people who are genuinely impressed with the desire to understand one of the greatest — and most bloodless — revolutions in history.

BARRY DOMVILE

Robin’s Tree

8th May 1939.

 

 

“As we advance in our social knowledge, we shall endeavour to make our governments paternal as well as judicial; that is, to establish such laws and authorities as may at once direct us in our occupations, protect us against our follies, and visit us in our distresses; a government which shall repress dishonesty, as now it punishes theft; which shall show how the discipline of the masses may be brought to aid the toils of peace, as the discipline of the masses has hitherto knit the sinews of battle; a government which shall have its soldiers of the ploughshare as well as its soldiers of the sword, and which shall distribute more proudly its golden crosses of industry — golden as the glow of the harvest — than it now grants its bronze crosses of honour — bronzed with the crimson of blood.

RUSKIN. Political Economy of Art.

 

 

“All front fighters fought side by side and went through an inferno. They are all comparable to the heroes of the ancient world. It was the manhood of the nations in their prime who fought and experienced the horrors of modern war.

In another war the flower of the nations’ men and women will have to fight. Europe will be destroyed if the best in all of the nations are wiped out. A new conflict will exceed even the ghastly tragedies of the Great War.

I believe that those who rattle the sabres have not participated in war. I know that war veterans speak and think differently.

They energetically desire to prevent another conflict. I hope that the men who are standing before me can contribute to preserve the peace of the world — a peace of honour and equality for all.

Let us not talk of prestige as between the victors and the defeated. This is my one request: Forget what has divided the nations before and remember that history has advanced.”

Field Marshal GOERING addressing the British

and German war veterans.

 

 

CONTENTS

 

CHAPTER ……………………………………………………………. PAGE

 

Dedication

To the Reader

Preface

Field Marshall Goering’s Address

I.   DER FUHRER ……………………………………………………….. 11

II.   THE BELEAGUERED CITY ……………………………………. 21

III.   NATIONAL SOCIALISM ……………………………………… 25

IV.   THE NAZI RALLYS AT NUREMBERG ……………………. 34

V.   THE FOREIGN POLICY OF GERMANY ……………………. 41

VI.   ENGLAND AND GERMANY ………………………………….. 49

VII.   MARCH 7th, A MOST IMPORTANT DATE …………… 54

VIII.   THE REAL ENEMY OF EUROPE ……………………….. 58

IX.   COMMUNISM VERSUS NATIONAL SOCIALISM …… 62

X.   THE UNION OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE …………………. 68

XI.   ACTS OF “AGGRESSION” BY GERMANY ……………… 79

XII.   THE DANCE OF DEATH ……………………………………… 85

XIII.   OUR FUTURE POLICY TOWARDS GERMANY ……. 93

XIV.   THE HITLER YOUTH MOVEMENT ……………………… 100

XV.   THE WINTER HELP ORGANIZATION ………………….. 104

XVI.   NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND THE PROTESTANT

CHURCH ……………………………………………………………………… 109

XVII. ECONOMICS …………………………………………………….. 118

XVIII. THE FOUR YEARS PLAN …………………………………… 138

XIX.   THE GERMAN COLONIES …………………………………. 141

XX.   THE LABOUR FRONT ………………………………………….. 146

XXI.   AGRICULTURE …………………………………………………. 155

XXII. MUNICH AND AFTER ………………………………………… 167

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter Seventeen

 

 

ECONOMICS

 

 

Why kill Germans when we can starve them.

Senator Pittman.

 

 

The post war period is one in which economics have gone mad and the most extraordinary things are done by Governments. In Brazil the Government throws thousands of tons of coffee beans into the sea while the consumer in this country is paying 2/6 to 3/- a lb. for beans which merely require to be brought to his door; and the Government of the USA. has paid farmers large subsidies not to grow food and let the land go derelict, while millions of unemployed are starving. In this country while it is admitted that one third of the population is underfed, the farmer is ploughing his potatoes into the land, and millions of fish are being thrown into the sea to keep up prices in the Billingsgate market. Last summer in the south of England the magnificent plum crop was left to rot on the trees, and in Cambridgeshire where the smallholder was getting 1/2 for 12 lbs. of carefully picked and packed Victoria plums, the retail shopkeeper in London 40 miles away was getting 8d. a lb.

We are told in the papers that the chicken farmer is being ruined, yet a chicken costs 1/- to 1/2 per lb. in London with all the offal weighed in and charged for at the same rate.

Not only does Nature give us of her abundance as never before in the history of mankind owing to improvements in agriculture, but the engineer has invented marvellous means of transport, — and yet the people are not fed.

Just as it is abhorrent to the German Government and the German people to see an idle man on the dole, so the modern economics which destroys food to keep up prices and fines heavily the man who grows more than his quota, is contrary to their economic principle.

[Page 119]

Hitler has said, “I am no student of modern economics, and I must believe that the German who by his labour produces an article of use, such as food, has enriched and not impoverished the Reich”. The implication is that what is needed to secure the food supply of a Nation is direction not destruction, and the first essential is to use the middle man for his proper function for which his experience fits him, — the distribution of food at a modest percentage to pay for his services. He can no longer rig the market in Germany, and force down prices for the farmer and force up prices for the consumer.

It is said, I know not with what truth, that a cabbage passes through the hands of twelve merchants between the farmer and the consumer in this country.

The problem of the proper distribution of food is no easy one and I discussed it with Germans over there, but they are satisfied that while adjustments may be necessary they are working on the right lines. The peasant farmer is as satisfied as any farmer would ever be, and the men, women and children in every quarter of Nuremberg, which is a small German Birmingham, look far better fed than in this country.

To give the farmer a sufficient living and feed the people is the first duty of the modern State.

There is another modern economic delusion which is not accepted in Germany, that work especially manual work is a curse, and that modern inventions should enable men to idle for 20 hours out of 24. Germany has not found it so. It is by hard work that she has been lifted out of the economic pit. Ask the boys in the Labour Camps if they would change the struggle with Nature, the use of pick and shovel, for sitting in a cinema watching a film, or packed in a crowd watching paid athletes play football, and they will laugh at you. Compare him, hardy and brown with the sun, marching singing through the streets, with our anaemic physically undeveloped city youth loafing with a fag in his mouth.

[Page 120]

In dealing with the problem of the staple articles of food the German Government has fixed a price for the farmer, and a price for the consumer, and while the middle man distributes, the State supervises and arranges to deal with the distribution when there is a shortage in one part of the country and an excess in another. The importation of food is regulated according to demand, and the duty paid equalizes the price with the internal price. Owing to the fact that so large a proportion of the land is in the hands of the peasant proprietor, they are not faced with our problem that any increase of profit to the farmer soon leaves his pocket in the form of rent or excessive interest to the Bank. The assistance of extra labour for seasons when labour is short on the land is arranged, and many of the temporary assistants become permanent land workers. When land has been reclaimed or formerly unfarmed land is being broken up for cultivation the State provides the new settler with capital.

They have found it impossible to fix prices for perishable foodstuffs, and have divided Germany into districts, the perishable foodstuffs being collected at a centre and redistributed from there.

They claim that this has proved a success, securing the consumer from’ excessive prices and protecting the producer from a loss. The handling of perishable foodstuffs is one of our most serious economic problems, the grower frequently selling at a loss, while the price of perishable foodstuffs in our cities is much too high for the poor man’s family to eat the quota of vegetables and fruit which is necessary for health. As I have said elsewhere, in devising the four years plan the Government is not satisfied even with this organization, putting the wastage of food at 1,500 million marks a year, one half of which takes place during distribution.

With our haphazard method of collecting and distributing and utterly inadequate markets and myriads of small greengrocers, with no proper methods of storage anywhere, the wastage must be enormous, and largely accounts for the excessive price to the consumer.

In Germany every encouragement is given to the allotment holder, with a view to the people in towns growing their own supplies. I have mentioned elsewhere the cheapness and excellence of the food in German restaurants.

[Page 121]

The system of magnificent motor roads, the construction of which is being vigorously pushed on, will help the matter of perishable food distribution still further. One of the absurd falsehoods which is repeated at intervals is that these roads are being built solely for military purposes. They are being built for sound economic reasons, but would doubtless prove very useful in a defensive war enabling troops to be quickly concentrated on any frontier. It is unnecessary to enlarge on the economic problem raised by fixed prices which is a complete departure from the economic principle of supply and demand and an open market, but they claim in Germany that they have found — as we have found — that the open market fails as a method of food distribution, and they seem to have been much more successful than our Milk, Potato and Bacon Boards. The probable reason is that owing to our love of compromise, we have combined the evils of a competitive system with the evils of a socialistic experiment, without getting the benefits of either. Either have a free market, or fix prices right through from producer to consumer.

It must be remembered that Germany has the advantage of having educated the people to a new ideal of service upon which they can call, which makes all the difference between failure and success. The desire is to assist these experiments and not try and find how to use them for private aggrandizement. To say that all the German people have grasped the idea of social service would be absurd, but their education in a new conception of social order is being vigorously carried on, and behind all is the stem necessity of making both ends meet for the whole Nation. We are so overflowing with the wealth of the world, though we share it round so unequally, that we think we can afford to be extravagant.

Their method of organizing the distribution of perishable food is well worth the study of the Ministry of Agriculture as it is one of our most serious economic problems to-day.

 

 

Finance

 

A series of articles attacking different aspects of National Socialism were published in The Banker two years ago. One is on the finance of the National Socialist Government, based on certain official figures. These articles are the only detailed examination of German finance by an expert, and therefore is made the basis of this chapter.

[Page 122]

This article reveals a strong bias against Germany, a bias which is still more reflected in the introduction to the series of hostile articles in The Banker, an introduction which consists of a most ignorant and violent attack on the National Socialist Government.

In spite of the bias the actual figures given in the article prove an excellent defence of National Socialist Finance, and I propose to discuss them in this chapter.

 

 

The Two Problems

 

When the National Socialist Government came into power they were faced with two problems, which required for their solution a large capital expenditure — namely, the necessity for reducing to reasonable figures the huge number of unemployed, amounting to 6,000,000, and the pressing necessity of arming the German people for defence, surrounded as they are by nations spending larger and larger sums on armaments and increasing the number of soldiers on a peace footing.

A government has two sources of money: increased taxation and borrowing. In this country the Government adopts two methods of borrowing, Treasury Bills and loans over long periods. From time to time a portion of the indebtedness under Treasury Bills is converted into a permanent loan.

We have found it necessary in order to bring our armaments up to the standard set in France and Russia to face an expenditure of £1,500,000,000. France claims to day to have the most powerful and best equipped army in Europe, the Soviet have 2,000,000 men on a peace footing and 6,000 bombing planes, and Germany by tremendous efforts can claim to have an army to-day sufficient for defence, which is all that she aims at having.

When we find it necessary to expend £1,500 millions merely to bring our existing armaments up to the modern level, it is evident that beginning from nothing, Germany had a tremendous task.

The most urgent problem before the German Government was the unemployed, and before plunging into armament expenditure she tried to persuade France to accept a reduced number of men on.a peace footing. Her proposals to do this were rejected.

[Page 123]

There are two ways of dealing with the unemployed problem. One, the easier, is to pay them out of taxation a dole sufficient to keep them alive.

This has been our method since the War and has cost us hundreds of millions with nothing to show for it.

We have occasionally undertaken public works in a sporadic and inefficient manner, resulting in wastage of public money with nothing to show for it commensurate with the expenditure.

The other method is to carry out public works which will increase the capital wealth of the nation on a well-thought out plan.

There is a great deal of capital expenditure which can be undertaken only by the State, as it would yield a doubtful profit to private enterprise and would require a vast capital. It is impossible to assess exactly the increase in wealth due to such expenditure.

 

 

Roads

 

It has from earliest times been the task of the State to make and maintain roads and to carry out vast schemes of land drainage, irrigation and land reclamation.

From the first clearances made by primitive man in the primeval forest, land reclamation has never paid on a strict accountant basis, but it has paid the people a thousand fold through the centuries.

One man in this country, Mr. Lloyd George, has advocated for years expenditure on public works. He pointed out among other things the necessity of up-to-date arterial roads, and the danger of the long neglect of land drainage in this country.

The recent disastrous floods in the Fens involving an expenditure of many millions if the Fen country is to be saved, is due to this neglect, and we are just beginning to deal with the question of arterial roads.

 

 

Sweden’s Example

 

The little country of Sweden adopted the plan of public works and is to-day the most prosperous country in Europe.

The German Government decided on a bold policy of public works. They are constructing throughout Germany magnificent arterial roads for motor traffic; they have reclaimed vast areas of land; they have undertaken great schemes of building and reconstruction; and have spent money in various other ways of permanent benefit to the German people.

[Page 124]

In five years they have reduced unemployment from 6,000,000 to nothing and have set up and equipped an army on a peace footing of 500,000 men. They are now proceeding to develop still further the internal resources of Germany under the four year’ plan, and to-day they are hiring labour from Italy and Holland.

Let me now return, from this long digression, to the financial problem.

In Great Britain, owing to the vast reserves of capital a Government can always float a permanent loan.

Germany, bled white by reparations and the vast confiscations after the War by the victorious allies, and heavily indebted by outside borrowing at exorbitant rates of interest, could not do that, although her internal war debt had been wiped out under the Socialist regime by a vast depreciation of currency.

The bold device adopted by the German Government was for the State to finance this large expenditure trusting to the economic recovery of Germany to take over this expenditure. This device has been fully justified by results, the expenditure being gradually converted into short term loans, corresponding to our Treasury Bills, followed by long term loans. The plan adopted is regarded as somewhat unorthodox by the writer of the article in The Banker, but he admits that owing to the control exercised over the banking system and finance in Germany it has been possible to do this without the consequences that usually follow such a policy — a rise in prices, and that the talk of approaching bankruptcy is absurd.

Taking as a reference figure the Budget of the year 1932, the expenditure was 6,700 million marks, the figures for:

1933-4 are 9,700 million marks

1934-5 are 12,200 million marks

1935-6 are 16,700 million marks

1936-7 are 18,800 million marks

showing a net increase of 31,100 million marks for these four years or £2,500 millions.

[Page 125]

 

 

Steady Rise

 

The yield of taxation during the period has been 9,800 million marks above that of 1932, rising steadily and progressively from year to year, and owing to other sources of income less than half this amount had to be raised by loans, a total indebtedness which is not large for a country of the population of Germany, and may be compared with our figure of over £8,000 million sterling.

In order to make as impressive a figure as possible, the writer of the article in The Banker charges the whole of the sum of 31,000 million marks to the armaments account alone, and draws an entirely fictitious budget for 1936-7.

He ignores the large expenditure on public works which comes out of this total, the fact that the Government has not only met the interest on external debt but paid off one-third of the external debt and the increase of annual expenditure required for the civil service, the maintenance of the army on a peace footing and the extension of the social services.

The National Socialist Government has resisted the easy way out of their economic and exchange difficulties by borrowing abroad after the manner of other European countries. France has just borrowed £50 millions from us and proposes to borrow more.

This policy of self-sufficiency, or, as our Press call it, “economic isolation”, is, perhaps, a reason of the unpopularity of Germany in the City, the world’s biggest moneylender, an unpopularity which is reflected in our Press and in The Banker.

When our Government announced an expenditure of £1,500 millions to bring our armaments up to the level of other European countries, the public were astounded at the enormous cost of the equipment of a modern army and navy.

In the light of these figures the total expenditure by the German Government under all heads of £2,500 millions is not excessive even though the whole had been devoted to rebuilding a navy and equipping an army of 500,000 men up to the standard of the armies of France and Russia.

[Page 126]

As an actual fact, 15,000 million marks have been spent on other purposes than on armaments.

The total amount borrowed is not excessive and the success of the capital expenditure is proved by the growing internal prosperity of Germany and the elimination of unemployment.

In fact the figures confirm the conclusion come to by other observers that Germany has been satisfied to create and equip an army sufficient for defence, and has no projects of foreign conquest.

Since this date Germany has been compelled most unwillingly to fresh expenditure on armaments owing to the vast sums being spent by Great Britain and France as it is impossible to trust the foreign policies of Democracies. Daladier has just been saved by 9 votes and if at the next election here the Labour Party came in they would probably take the first opportunity to force war on Germany.

The difficult position in which Germany is placed by the heavy reparations she had to pay, forcing her to borrow money outside at high rates of interest, has never been properly appreciated in this country. When she had been bled to the last sixpence, and her economic ruin completed by the occupation of the Ruhr, she was left with a heavy external debt which had to be repaid some time and on which the interest was due.

In spite of her economic distress she has never adopted the facile expedient of repudiating her debt, and has paid off one third of the capital sum. We cancelled a thousand millions of the debt France owed to us, and also cancelled large sums due from Italy and Belgium, and we still owe four hundred millions to the United States and are neither repaying the capital nor paying the interest. The Soviet not only repudiated the debt of the former government, but confiscated wholesale the property of companies in Russia financed by foreign capital. It has been usual for countries after a revolution to repudiate the debts of the former government, and the Nazi government might well have followed this practice; on the contrary they assumed the whole burden, have done their best to pay the interest due, and have also taken over the Austrian debt on a reduction of interest of their own debt being agreed to. Other countries besides those mentioned have failed to meet either capital or interest since the war, and Germany is one of the very few countries who faced financial ruin as a result of the war and who are honestly meeting their obligations to the best of their ability.

[Page 127]

They have also not adopted the device of depreciating their currency which has been done by so many other countries, having restored the gold mark after the disastrous financial crash.

Having to meet their foreign commitments, and having been deprived of their last ounce of gold by their foreign creditors, they have to control very strictly exports and imports and to prevent any capital leaving Germany. They have also been compelled by their financial position to enter bargains with foreign countries by which they exchange goods directly for goods, and in order to make the plan workable the bargain has to be made to cover several years. This has been described by Mr. Hudson in the House of Commons as an unfair method of trading and he has advised an economic war against Germany to compel them to abandon this method of trading which is forced upon them by their creditors in the city of London and in New York. Dr. Schacht has himself told us that he considers this method of trading “horrible”, and said that if Germany could come to some arrangement with her creditors she would adopt unrestricted trading like other countries. It is surely obvious that a buyer and seller have a right to make any bargain they choose, and that no method of trading can be described as unfair. Mr. Hudson was also mistaken in saying that the German government was subsidising the sale of their goods abroad and was by her policy lowering the standard of living in Germany, — the attempt to calculate the values of this exchange of goods for goods by converting into sterling being quite misleading.

Germany has not only had a political revolution but has carried out an economic revolution in her method of calculating wealth. All other countries still adopt gold as their standard but Germany deprived of gold is calculating wealth in terms of labour production, a new method which is worthy of the study of economists.

When the Nazi party came into power they adopted the very bold policy of putting everyone to work by means of government credits. The result of this policy has been very remarkable.

[Page 128]

The government money being used to promote vast schemes of road building and land reclamation, the demand of these men for food and other products stimulated other industries and the national income increased so rapidly, that it has been possible to convert this government credit into loans based upon savings, and today far from having any unemployed, Germany has had to import labour, while by every figure by which the prosperity of a country can be tested the national wealth is steadily rising.

When they first proposed to provide work by means of government credit, they were told by the economists that this would result in an immediate rise of prices, but owing to the control of prices exercised by the government no such rise in prices has taken place. At every stage in these bold and new economic experiments the economists have prophesied disaster, and have been proved to be wrong. Dr. Schacht has told us that this economic policy would have been quite impossible unless the German people had first been converted to the Nazi doctrine, and were therefore willing to help the government by loyally carrying out their wishes, instead of making private profit out of the difficulties of the government.

Moreover, while other nations are spending more and more on armaments, Germany is directing her efforts to increasing the productivity of her soil, and the development of new and valuable products which the genius of her chemists is extracting synthetically from her two raw materials — coal and wood.

We find therefore that, after the author of the article in The Banker has written his worst against the German government, he has made out an excellent case for her financial policy and dispelled the wild rumours of an excessive expenditure on armaments.

The most recent figures for Germany reveal an increasing prosperity and increasing revenue from taxation. Borrowing by the Government is strictly limited by the amount required to pay interest out of taxation.

 

 

The Monopoly of Raw Materials

 

The graph on the opposite page makes it possible to see at a glance the monopoly of raw materials which is held by the British and French and Dutch Empires, the U.S.A. and the U.S.S.R.

Striking as this diagram is, it does not tell the whole story, because countries outside these are largely financed by British and American capital.

The Argentine, for instance, is at present largely in the hands of British and U.S.A. capitalists.

[Page 129]

 

 

The columns give the percentages of the world’s raw materials produced by the British, French and Dutch Empires, the U.S.S.R. and the U.S.A. The black [pink] portions represent the percentages produced in the British Empire.

[Page 130]

Other nations wishing to buy raw materials are therefore faced by several difficulties.

In the first place they find a barrier of hostile tariffs against the sale of the goods with which they wish to buy raw materials.

In the second place they find preferential agreements like the Ottawa Agreement.

In the third place they find combines to limit supplies.

These combines are of two kinds. There are government combines, like the tin combine arranged by our government with the governments of the tin producing countries. And there are commercial combines, like that of the copper producers, for the limitation of output.

The world’s oil supplies are in the hands of some three or four big companies which arrange together the price of petrol and of other oils they produce.

We own practically the whole of the world’s output of nickel, which is worked by one financial organization with British and American capital.

We, Russia and the U.S.A. possess practically the whole of the world’s production of gold.

It may be argued that, for example with tin, the German buyer and the British buyer both have to pay a monopoly price. But, as the British seller lives across the street, what we lose on the swings we make on the roundabouts. We are transferring money from one pocket to another.

Nations like Germany are not in that position.

The conference on raw materials is a meeting of monopolists to discuss their monopoly and is of as much practical value as the disarmament conferences.

The question of raw materials is an international question, in that there are monopolies held by some nations to the impoverishment of other nations.

Monopolies within a nation can be dealt with by the people of that nation, but world-wide monopolies in which groups of nations are plundering other nations is a policy of modern world-wide finance for which no solution has been suggested, or rather the obvious solution will be passed unanimously as a pious opinion but will have no possible practical result, the nations owning the monopolies having not only enormous capital reserves, but overwhelming military forces.

[Page 131]

The main business of politicians is to create false issues to deceive the people and President Roosevelt did so the other day when referring to the China-Japanese war, when he proclaimed that the World issue is between Peace loving Democracies and aggressive nations who are in favour of war.

The main issue in the World to-day is the old primitive issue — the need for food.

The World monopoly of raw materials, controlled principally by the British Empire and international financial interests, which are held principally in Great Britain and the U.S.A., is creating a serious economic problem in many nations of which three are most prominent to-day-Japan, Germany and Italy — but France and Russia naturally stand in with us. I have already mentioned the attempt of Italy to find an open door by the conquest of Abyssinia forced upon her by England and France.

Japan is fighting in China to obtain extended markets for her manufactures.

The problem is, as I have said, the primitive one of food, and Japan, Germany and Italy are the three nations of the first rank who form the triple spearhead for a world demand for free trade in raw materials.

For the possessing nations to meet and reprove Japan is pure hypocrisy. The Abyssinian war was forced on Italy, and the Chinese war forced on Japan by the Empires and by international financial control of necessary supplies, and unless a World war is to come, their reasonable demands will have to be met.

The monetary system existing in the world before the war was simple. All money was based on gold and paper or token coinage in every country in the world except China, was interchangeable for a certain weight of gold, and the amount of paper notes issued had a certain fixed ratio to gold reserve.

The reasons for selecting gold are the durability of the metal, the large gold reserve — the accumulation of centuries — and the scarcity of the metal as an ore and cost of extracting, the result being that the output each year did not increase by a large amount the quantity of gold in use. The Mint bought all the gold offered them and converted it into gold coins which were freely used.

[Page 132]

It had been possible to handle the increasing trade of the world partly by the printing of paper money, and partly by the increasing use of promises to pay or cheques.

During the war the whole system was abandoned, and the war financed by the creation of credit and the printing of paper notes as required. Since the war the coinage of gold has never been resumed, and there is no necessary connection between gold reserves and the number of notes issued, we having just abandoned the last residue of such a control. Vast quantities of gold are being accumulated by the U.S.A., France and Great Britain, gold is being mined in larger quantities than ever before and the price of gold measured in sterling is always rising.

In the case of the paper franc and the paper dollar, they have a fixed value in terms of gold but they cannot be exchanged for gold at the national bank. There is no fixed ratio in terms of gold for the pound sterling. The French Government has had repeatedly to alter the ratio between the paper franc and gold, depreciating their currency more and more.

Gold reserves have some value to a country as the gold can be sold in small quantities at the current price to another country to settle debts, and is still used in that way; but obviously if a large quantity of the gold reserves were thrown on the market gold would drop rapidly in price and the “gold is wealth” delusion would vanish never to return; consequently Great Britain, France, and the U.S.A. cannot part with their vast stores of gold which has merely a fictitious value which is not realisable. In case of war involving the three democracies, if they tried to utilise the gold it would lose its value.

To return to paper money, if we imagine an entirely self contained country with no external trade the amount of paper money in circulation is a matter of indifference as far as prices are concerned, as earnings would have to be at once adjusted to change of prices. It would also obviously be necessary to adjust interest and rent. If before inflation one pound bought twenty loaves of bread and after inflation one pound bought only ten loaves of bread, wages, salaries, interest and rent would have to be adjusted accordingly.

[Page 133]

As far as it is possible to discover any intelligible policy on the part of our Government the aim has been, since we abandoned our attempt to return to gold, to keep the cost of living fairly level. The abandonment of gold and the drop of the pound from twenty to fourteen shillings measured against gold produced no change in our economic life.

The problems arise when the self contained country begins to trade with other countries. Trade consists of the exchange of goods for goods and their price in terms of a fixed standard roughly approximates to the cost of production in each country, and if there is a common measure of money such as existed before the war, the process of barter settles the amount of an article to be exchanged for so much gold, but since the war as the value of money in terms of gold fluctuates in different countries, the exchange of goods is no longer a simple matter. If for instance owing to printing paper money it now takes two pounds instead of one pound to buy twenty loaves, while in the other country it takes twenty frances which were equivalent to one pound before the inflation, the franc is now worth two shillings instead of one shilling in the new currency.

As the money of each country is only legal tender in that country, trade involves two transactions, — the exchange of goods and the purchase of the money in the one country with the money in the other country to settle the account, and the relative value of money in the two countries is constantly fluctuating.

In order to obtain some approach to stability in prices France, Great Britain and the U.S.A. have entered into an arrangement to try and keep the value ratios of the pound sterling, franc and dollar approximately the same, and the British Government has put aside £500 millions which is used to buy and sell gold, pounds sterling, and the money of other countries in an attempt to keep the ratios fairly stable. Their transactions are secret and: of course might end in disaster if a big world slump took place or war broke out.

[Page 134]

It is not too much to say that those responsible for finance in the various countries in the world have no longer any clear understanding of what they are doing in a mass of complicated transactions in values which are purely fictitious. To take an example, the Bank of England buying gold at the current price, entered it in the books at the old value of the sovereign. The Bank has now decided to write up the value of the gold they hold to the market price, and seem to think that by a book entry they have raised the wealth stored in the Bank by some hundreds of millions.

Another big war would bring the whole fictitious system crashing down.

The result of these fictitious systems of currency and the piling up of tariffs, quotas and restrictions on trade, has been a series of financial crises in France, the two million unemployed in this country, the eleven million unemployed in the U.S.A., and distress in more distant parts of the world like Burma where the peasants are starving.

Each economist has a new theory of money more elaborate than the last which all his fellow economists attack.

Germany, when the Nazi party came into power, was in the position of having been stripped of all outside investments, of all gold, and in addition being heavily in debt to the financiers in outside countries for money borrowed to pay reparations.

The new Government would have been quite justified in doing what other revolutionaries had done and repudiated the external debt, and it might have been better for Germany and the outside world if she had done so. Other war debts have been repudiated right and left. France has never attempted to pay what she was owing after we had let her off a thousand millions, and we are not even paying the interest on our debt to America. Germany alone had been an honest debtor and is paying for it.

With no gold, no foreign exchange, six million unemployed and starving farmers she determined to go back to the fundamental principles of economics which have been lost sight of by the financiers of other countries. One thing she was determined on. Not to go into the world financial market and borrow money ever again.

This is the real quarrel that we and the U.S.A., the two big moneylenders, have with her. If she came to the “city” to borrow £100 millions all the attacks in the Press, the denunciations on platforms, the utilization of the fugitive Jew as a political stunt would stop. The City pulls the strings and the Press obey.

[Page 135]

The fundamental principles are that wealth is the product of labour applied to raw materials to make articles of utility. Labour may be employed to make goods for immediate consumption, or to increase capital values by carrying out work which will enable more articles of utility to be produced at a lower cost. The building of motor roads is an excellent example of the second application of labour as it facilitates and cheapens the transport of goods. The German Government decided to introduce a new method of measuring the value of the mark, discarding gold and making the mark represent a labour unit. Taking the total output of labour in the country the number of marks in circulation is limited to that output, and so prices are kept very level, only small fluctuations taking place.

They also proceeded to make a very bold experiment by creating credit through the State to set everyone to work on some useful employment. They were under no delusion as to this fictitious capital. They realised it would have to be replaced by the only real capital, savings from the product of labour, and they took care that every penny was utilised as far as possible to increase the capital wealth of the country. Unfortunately it could not all be utilised for this purpose, because France and Great Britain having refused to consider Hitler’s offer to limit standing armies and carry disarmament as far as they were willing to go. People in this country including members of Parliament and newspaper editors are under the delusion that making guns is a legitimate employment of labour and are astonished that the more they spend in this way the larger the number of unemployed. Making guns makes the country poorer not richer as it is labour misdirected from increasing capital value.

The building of motor roads, the reclamation of land, the improvement of land already under cultivation and forests, the remodelling of factories, the capital expenditure necessary to utilise more fully Germany’s raw materials was all useful expenditure increasing the national wealth. When the Nazi Government proceeded by the creation of credit to set everyone to work, the economists here said that inflation and a rise in prices must follow.

[Page 136]

No rise in prices took place. This was due in the first place to the centralised control and the willingness of the German people to obey orders, and the fact that no speculative cornering of raw materials and gambling on the stock exchange was allowed, and in the second place to the utilization of the money to produce capital goods of real value. There were no strikes for shorter hours and higher wages. The German workman knowing that he is not being utilized to pile up huge profits for the capitalists, plays the game. Gradually but steadily this created credit was replaced by real capital, savings obtained from industry.

The interesting result of the calculation of the mark in terms of labour, is that while the other capitalistic countries have millions of unemployed Germany has had to import foreign labour. It is true that most unwillingly she is spending money on munitions owing to the colossal expenditure in munitions here and in France but that is only a fraction of her expenditure which is going to increase the economic strength of Germany.

The mark stands today practically at its value in gold of the old gold mark.

As other countries are busy depreciating their currency, a depreciation which is shown in the rising value of gold, it is necessary to prevent money being taken out of Germany and to make the taking of money out of the country a severely punishable offence. In spite of every care smuggling does go on and there is a market for marks in London where they increase in value as the money of other countries is depreciated more and more.

Germany in trading with other countries is faced by the difficulty that she has no gold, no reserves of foreign exchange and no outside investments the interest on which is paid in goods. She has the further difficulty that she is faced everywhere by high tariffs, quotas and restrictions of output. These restrictions of output and artificial prices for raw materials do not affect us and the U.S.A. who own directly or indirectly most of the world’s raw materials which are not owned by France, Holland and Russia.

The English buyer has to pay an artificial price for tin but the owner of the tin mine across the street reaps the advantage. It is money from one English pocket into another English pocket. Germany buys the tin at our artificial price and the same applies to practically all raw materials. She needs colonies especially for semi-tropical products, palm oil, cocoa and so on. It would pay us a thousand times to give back her colonies. The £2,000 millions we are spending on armaments is because we refuse to give them back.

[Page 137]

It cost us £8,000 millions to destroy her export trade which existed before the war. How much is it going to cost us to crush her again if we can succeed in doing so?

When trying to develop her export trade Germany could not do it on the plan followed by us with reserves of gold, and foreign exchange, and vast sums from investments abroad, so she applied the same principle that she had applied to her internal economic problem.

She knows the real labour value of her goods in marks, and going to a foreign country she proceeds to barter an exchange of goods for goods which is advantageous to both sides of the bargain. To do this she had obviously to arrange the exchange for a period of several years and give the other country credit to the extent of her immediate purchase of raw materials to be paid in manufactured goods. She has therefore brought trade to its ultimate real basis and cut out the complications of varying currencies.

This is called over here “unfair” method of trading. Every buyer and seller has the right to make such a bargain as suits them both and no one has a right to interfere. Germany is accused of subsidizing exports. This is not peculiar to Germany. We subsidize our coal exports, and this is not a new accusation. It was made after the War and caused Lloyd George to pass the Safeguarding of Industries Act. I believe no action was ever taken under this Act which is still open to anyone who can prove Germany is selling below cost of manufacture.

The real reason for the ferocity of Fleet Street against Germany is that the German Government has determined to work out its own economic problems and avoid international finance like the plague. If Germany came to the City for a loan the financial syndicates that control our “free” press would call off the journalists.

[Page 138]

 

 

 

 

Chapter Eighteen

 

 

THE FOUR YEARS’ PLAN

 

 

Extraordinary misconceptions of the nature and purpose of the four years’ plan have become common in this country.

According to the Daily Express our Foreign Office have made it a condition of more friendly relations with Germany that the four years’ plan be withdrawn, a most remarkable request as my readers will agree when I have explained what the plan is.

The economic position of Germany, with no gold reserves, heavily indebted abroad and with no colonies and foreign investments, has been dealt with already. Evidently under these circumstances she is thrown entirely on her own resources, and must find what possibilities of development are to be found within her own country.

It is also necessary for her to consider what would happen in case of an attack by the allied powers of Europe. In the last war she was starved out and had in addition a serious shortage of materials required for munitions. She must therefore be prepared for this eventuality.

These considerations are not absent from the councils of other Nations. We are taxing all users of petrol to enable the I.C.I. to make petrol from coal without a loss and are heavily subsidizing agriculture without, it must be admitted, much success.

It is also obvious that increased use of imported raw materials for purposes of manufacture will not do anything to relieve the situation. She must seek to utilize the land to its highest capacity to produce food, and in addition call upon the ingenuity of her chemists to utilize fully her two raw materials — coal and wood.

In order to carry out this task in a comprehensive manner Field Marshall Goering has been appointed as the head of the four years’ plan and an organization has been created divided into six offices.

[Page 139]

The Board for the production of raw materials has undertaken;

 

a) to increase the production of natural raw materials,

b) the prevention of waste through the use of raw materials for purposes not absolutely necessary,

c) the production of certain synthetic raw materials such as petrol, mineral oils, rubber and artificial wool which are made from coal or wood,

d) the encouragement of relevant research including a complex examination of the German subsoil,

e) the organization and direction of the production of industrial fats.

The section dealing with agriculture has to aim at producing raw materials which are scarce in Germany wherever there is a possibility of agriculture being able to do so.

The cultivation of the Soya bean to obtain a supply of vegetable fats is an excellent example, the production of vegetable fibres and an increase in sheep farming to add. to the supply of wool.

It is also the duty of this department to take all possible steps to increase the production of food.

In connection with food an interesting enquiry is to be made into the loss and deterioration of foodstuffs in transit and in the home.

The estimated loss from these two causes is put at 1,500 million marks a year. When we consider how careful and economical the German housewife is, the loss in this country is probably much greater. The savings in this direction involve correct storage of perishable foods and the collection and classification of refuse.

This household refuse is to be used for feeding pigs. Some 4,000 pigs are fed in this way on State property in Magdeburg. A similar arrangement prevails in other cities.

Powers are given in connection with the whole plan for the control of prices.

[Page 140]

The difference between the position of Germany before the war and to-day is well illustrated by the following figures. Before the war she had 30,000 million marks invested abroad; to-day she has foreign debts of 13,000 million marks.

Her export trade has now improved sufficiently to show a surplus which is sufficient but no more than sufficient to pay the interest on her foreign debts. The aim of the whole plan is not self-sufficiency, which is both undesirable and impossible, but the making of an economically sound Germany which will lead to a natural development of her export and import trade.

[Page 141]

 

 

 

 

 

======================================

 

 

PDF of Part 1. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 1

PDF of Part 2. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 2

PDF of Part 3. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 3

PDF of Part 4. Click to download  (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 4

PDF of Part 5. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 5

PDF of Part 6. Click to download (0.3 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 6

PDF of Part 7. Click to download  (0.6 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 7

PDF of this post. Click to download (0.6 MB). >> The Case for Germany – Part 8

 

 

 

Version History

 

 

 

 

Version 2: May 6, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

 

 

Version 1: Published Oct 1, 2014

Posted in Bk - The Case for Germany, Germany, Hitler Youth, International Finance, Jews, National Socialism, Propaganda - Anti-German, Revisionism, The International Jew, Third Reich, White Nationalism, WW I | Leave a comment