Ursula Haverbeck “The Greatest Problem of Our Time” — TRANSCRIPT

 

[In this 19 minute video Ursula Haverbeck, a German woman who lived through WWII challenges the German authorities, declaring their inability to provide genuine evidence for the so-called “Holocaust“. Her conclusion is [quite rightly] that there was NO “Holocaust” and that it is black propaganda, stating [again quite rightly] that WWI and II were created by organized jewry as part of their larger plan for world domination, aka, the Jew World Order  —  KATANA.]

 

 

 

Ursula Haverbeck

 

The Greatest Problem of

 

Our Time

 



 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BvRvNZo5Gk

[NOTE: The video has been removed from YouTube. Do a search for it in your browser — Sep 2019]

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to watch the video.

 

Published on Dec 22, 2014

 

YouTube Stats

 

  Sep 11 — Views: 48,106 – Comments: 770 – Likes: 819  Dislikes: 105
Jul 30 — Views: 44,757 – Comments: 2,338 – Likes: 752  Dislikes: 92
 

 

Description

 

 

This nice little old German lady is breaking the law. What she says in twenty minutes in this video could land her in prison for up to five years. That law is wrong.

Find out why, as Ursula Haverbeck challenges “The Greatest Problem of Our Time.

Visit Ursula’s site (in German): http://ursula-haverbeck.info/

 

 

 

 

Transcript

 

 

 

[0:00]

 

 

My dear fellow Germans, do, you know the answer?

 

Where did the murder by gassing of six million (or at least, millions) of Jews take place?

 

For five years now I have been asking this question — and waiting, in vain, for the answer.

 

Perhaps you will think it is rather remarkable that I should even pose this question.

 

Why do I do it?

 

The “Holocaust” is self-evident, after all, everyone knows that six million Jews were gassed, above all in Auschwitz. And yet, precisely in the past twenty to twenty-five years this claim has become ever more questionable.

 

First, through the reduction of the number of victims in Auschwitz itself. It was there — and this in the public news programming of ZDF TV — on the eighth of October, 1993, in the open view of all citizens. That the old memorial tablet with it’s “Four Million Murdered” was taken down and replaced with a new tablet with only “About One and a Half Million”.

 

[Image — click to enlarge] The changing plaques of Auschwitz.

 

And in a debate afterwards, Jews, Poles and Gypsies quarreled over who had the biggest share among these victims. An explanation or even an apology to the German people for having, for decades, accused them with a false number was nowhere to be heard.

 

Secondly, through an article published by “Der Spiegel” editor Fritjof Meyer, in a respected scholarly journal, namely “Osteuropa!” [Eastern Europe], in May 2002, in which, taking note of new discoveries resulting from the emergence of previously unknown documents, etc., he comes to the conclusion that in Auschwitz itself no one at all was gassed.

 

[Image] Fritjof Meyer.

 

And it’s certainly not one and a half million either, but at the most — Mr. Meyer is very careful — in a subcamp of Auschwitz, in Birkenau, and even there, outside the camp itself, in a farmhouse (the foundations of which, curiously, have only recently been discovered) around (“presumably”, he says) 365,000 Jews were gassed. That too, thus, is an open question.

 

And amazingly Mr. Meyer has never been prosecuted or indicted or denounced to the police for “trivialization” of the “Holocaust”.

 

And thirdly — and this really is new for all of us, though it was published book in 2000 — the book “Garrison and Commandant Orders” from the Institute for Contemporary History, a collection of material which had been stored away in Moscow ever since Auschwitz was overrun by the Russians, by the Red Army, and which now was made available to the Institute for Contemporary History.

 

[44 pages excerpted from Garrison and Commandant Orders, Auschwitz 1940-1945 in German]

 

And already by the year 2000 the Institute for Contemporary History had deemed it necessary to publish it.

 

This is quite a thick book, mind you, and it costs the tidy little sum, today in Euros, of 124. But you can order it, and you can ask for it in the library too and study it there.

 

From these “Commandant Orders”, in which the instructions from the administration at Auschwitz to the guard staff were laid down, complete with dates, numbers and so on, all very precise as is usual with German officialdom, telling the guards what they are able to do.

 

It emerges clearly and undeniably, plain to see, that Auschwitz was NOT an extermination camp, but rather a work camp in which people were to be kept as fit for work as possible in order for them to work in the munitions industries which were necessary for the war effort.

 

Naturally, with the continuous worsening of the transportation conditions and the like, and of course the events of the war itself, it became ever more different to care for a large number of people in such a camp. But it was, and remained, a work camp and not an extermination camp. And that is precisely what, from the beginning, those who served there have always insisted.

 

[05:00]

 

Now, finally, one might think, there would have to be a public explanation and a reconsideration, as well, of all the trials in which German is have been condemned because they doubted that Auschwitz was an extermination camp; here now we have the confirmation that they were right. But once more nothing happened.

 

To this day some of these people are still in prison.

 

All that should cause any thinking person to ask the question:

 

If people are still being imprisoned because the murder of the six million Jews is ‘self-evident’, well then, where were they murdered?

 

You need to tell us that.

 

And that led me to right with this question, repeatedly, to the Central Council of Jews in Germany, to whom I have written three times in succession in the last five years and asked them this question;

 

— then to the German Association of Judges;

— to the Chief Justices of the Regional and Higher Regional Courts;

— to the Prosecutors General’s Offices of the sixteen German States

— and now also to the Ministry of Justice.

 

Since I have received from these other institutions — and these are all public, official institutions — no answer to this question, quite plainly, none of the people written to and questioned knows where six million Jews were gassed, or even simply murdered.

 

That leaves, for a thinking person, only one conclusion: They have no answer, there is no answer! And why?

 

Because there was no “Holocaust”.

 

Since this murder is supposed to be “self-evident” — as the courts to this day never tire of emphasizing and holding up to us over and over — one cannot now go on about some kind of “order to maintain secrecy” [i.e., preventing us from knowing more] and a retreat book to a drastically reduced number of victims is also impossible. For then the singularity, the uniqueness, the unforgivable scope of the greatest crime of all time would be called into question.

 

We need merely think of the victims of the Rhine Meadow Camps, of Dresden, Hiroshima, … And the huge number of victims, more than 2,500,000, during the expulsion of the German is from the East.

 

 

[Image] German POWs in one of the Rhine Meadow Camps. Over one million German soldiers died through deliberate neglect in these camps after the war.

 

No valid confession can be extracted by torture and no one claimed that in this concentration camp there was ever a gas chamber be which people were gassed, except for [former Auschwitz commandant Rudolf] Hoess, who was tortured so terribly that he afterwards said:

 

I would have signed anything”.

 

Indeed Fritjof Meyer himself noted that it is “not to be taken into account” in any reasonably fair trial when someone, after being tortured so terribly, says:

 

Yes, it was three million, or however many million, whatever you like, that were gassed by us”.

 

I think it’s now become go clear and comprehensible for us, this question which we’ve always wondered about: Why indeed must there be this Paragraph 130 of the German Criminal Code?

In order to keep these things from being looked into too closely?

 

And it also becomes comprehensible that the innumerable motions to present evidence which the accused have put forward. These could only serve as evidence of something if that something happened; clearly they could serve as evidence of “nothing” — and so they had to disappear.

 

If we now look at world politics after 1945 it becomes clear that the “Holocaust” is the greatest and most enduring lie in history.

 

It was needed in order to finally complete the centuries long struggle for world domination but the “Chosen People” — that world domination was once promised to them by their god Yahweh, and they believed in that promise firmly, it was their conviction.

 

Whether we call them Zionists, Khazars, oligarchs or globalizers, it is always the same. World War I and II themselves, were merely a preliminary stage for this achievement — in their view, understandably, but why, why in the view of the French, the Swiss, the Germans?

 

[10:11]

 

Why have German judges, whose independence is constitutionally guaranteed, gone along with that? Why have state prosecutors, who should represent the federal government, indeed the German state, represented the interests of Israel instead?

 

For that is what they have done in these trials.

 

And why have all the historians in our universities not unanimously refused to renounce their freedom of research, which likewise is guaranteed to them constitutionally?

 

And this poor, mis-educated, lie-fed German people, … Will it turn, indignant, against those who want to relieve it of this deeply implanted belief? Might Germans not be ready, and able, to rethink their beliefs?

 

The ancient Greeks used to lay such weighty questions at the feet of the gods. I do the same.

 

Before concluding, I would like to present a much needed — even if it has been done before — definition of the question work camped extermination camped concentration camp. I want to do this in order to prevent misunderstandings, and to emphasize once more the no revisionist has ever denied there were concentration camp is. Their existence is never questioned by the so-called “Neo-Nazis”, as they are called today, or “Right-extremists”, when these want to be taken seriously.

 

Moreover, concentration camp is were no invention of the National Socialists, but were already around during the Boer War in 19900, and indeed were established by the English.

 

And they’re still being used set up to this day by the Americans, as for example at Guantanamo Bay. According to the Hague Conventions on War on Land, members of an enemy nation may be interned in order to prevent espionage. And the multiple, repeated Jewish declarations of war against the Third Reich since 1933 led to a situation in which, as for example Professor Ernst Nolte has established, the Third Reich was justified in treating German Jews as prisoners of war, for these declarations of war had clearly demonstrated that Jewry considered itself at war with the Third Reich. Ernst Nolte says in his book, “The Passing of the Past” [Das Vergehen der Vergangenheit] where anyone can read it on page 171 and earlier as well on page 21.

 

 

So there were German concentration camps — no revisionist has ever disputed that. Nor is it disputed that the majority of the Jews were interned in them. This occurred in particular following the failure of Hitler’s many offers of peace to England. (See in this connection English historian Martin Allen in his book, “The Hitler-Hess Deception” which you can get at any bookstore.)

 

 

These concentration camps were, in Germany, in the Third Reich, work camps — during the war. The word, “concentration camp” however, is often used to evoke the idea of extermination — or emotionally provoke it. With the increasing ferocity of the war, and above all with the increasing bombardment of all transport facilities — practically the entire infrastructure in Germany — through Allied bombing raids, living condition in the concentration camp obviously became ever more difficult and not just for the German people.

 

And likewise it has not been disputed by anyone that in Germany concentration camp is there were incidents of cruelty and mistreatment and even murder. Why otherwise would four — some say even five — camp commandants have been brought before an SS Tribunal, with two of them even being sentenced to death?

 

[15:14]

 

The taking up and exposure and publication of these events has come about entirely through the efforts of the revisionists, they have never been mentioned in court. And I ask myself if any other state — any of the states that stood against us then in open hostility — had such drastic punishments existed for the mistreatment of prisoners?

 

If historians meanwhile have arrived at fundamentally lower numbers of victims (for the concentration camps) that needed does not mean that a correction was thereby made in public as well. The saying, “History is written by the victors” in no way implies that this history must correspond with the truth.

 

We must therefore demand, now that in verifiable form, and now that these official reports and contemporary statements from the time of the Third Reich, as, for example, the Commandant Orders, have been made public, that st the very least there should now follow a public explanation — I would say — an apology too from those who have spread these lies. And finally, of necessity there must also follow a reconsideration of all these convictions based on a false claim.

 

In conclusion, I would like to read a quotation from Germar Rudolf, who as a young chemist made a thorough study of the chemical properties of Zyklon B — on professional grounds — including on location in Auschwitz, something for which he had to spend three-and-a-half years in prison, because his research conclusions, as a chemist, were different from so-called political correctness opinion.

 

I would like to read this quotation from him in conclusion. Germar Rudolf writes:

 

One of the important characteristics of evil is that it forbids questioning and it taboos or punishes the candid search for answers.” (I might add, punishes BY LAW.)

“By prohibiting a person to ask questions and to search for answers it is denying that which makes us human. For the capacity to doubt and to search for answers to pressing problems is one of the most important attributes that distinguishes humans from animals.

 

This, one can read in his “Lectures on the ‘Holocaust’” page 12.

 

 

[Note: The entire PDF book can be downloaded (12.5 MB) here:

http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf]

 

It is therefore urgently necessary that an official, public clarification, unencumbered by any taboo or law, be provide to the German people and to the entire world that explains what really happened in the German concentration camp is.

 

Thank you.

 

 

(Subtitles in video by Kladderadatsch. Thanks for watching! )

 

 

[18:44]

 

 

END

 

======================================

See Also:

 

======================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (3.0 MB).

Ursula Haverbeck – Greatest Problem of Our Time – TRANSCRIPT

 

 

_____________________

 

Version History

 

Version 4: Feb 29, 2020 — Added See Also link.

 

Version 3Sep 17, 2019 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp version.

 

Version 2Sep 11, 2016 — Fixed various typos. Added some links. Added images. Added PDF of post for download.

 

Version 1Jul 30, 2016 — Created post.

 

This entry was posted in Auschwitz, Brainwashing, Germany, Germar Rudolf, Hitler, Holocaust, Holohoax, Jew World Order, Jewish Problem/Question, Jews, Jews - Lying, Jews - Naming, Media - jewish domination, Mind Control, National Socialism, Propaganda - Anti-German, Revisionism, Third Reich, Transcript, typhus, Ursula Haverbeck, Waffen SS, White genocide, WW I, WW II, Zyklon B. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Ursula Haverbeck “The Greatest Problem of Our Time” — TRANSCRIPT

  1. John Engelman says:

    Those who present conspiracy theories make assertions that are difficult to prove or disprove. They will say that the gas chambers in the death camps were delousing chambers, that Lee Harvey Oswald could not have fired so quickly and accurately, that the World Trade Center would not have collapsed so quickly if explosives had not been planted in the buildings, etc.

    Look at the big picture. If the Holocaust did not happen everyone who survived a Nazi concentration camp and every soldier who liberated one conspired to lie about what was happening in the camps.

  2. Daisy says:

    @John:

    The Red Cross were frequent visitors to the camps under Nazi control and attested to the fact 271’000 had died, primarily due to disease such as Typhus. However, the Red Cross were not allowed behind the iron curtain, to inspect camps run by the Soviet regime.

    “The Holocaust” narrative was a Newspeak word coined circa 1978, which is when the “holocaust” narrative took off.

    If there was an extermination program, and seeing as how the Germans are renowned for their efficiency, how is it that the “survivors” at the turn of the century were estimated at around 1 million – this would have required around 4 million “survivors” to be alive at the end of the war.

    The vast majority of the people who survived Auschwitz survived because the Nazis wanted them to survive. In fact those in the camps were able to live out the war in relative safety unlike German civilians who were bombed to smithereens – more Germans died in the bombing of Berlin than in all of the UK during the entirety of the war.

    Holocaust means death by fire, and the real holocaust took place toward the German people, with every single major city and town destroyed by Allied bombing. In fact the devastation wreaked in many cities was worse than than caused by the atomic bomb. Dresden, where refugees fled after the war, was similarly bombed even though it served no military purpose.

    As for “survivor tales” many have been found to be false, including The Diary of Anne Frank, which was exposed as a hoax as reported by Der Spiegel.

  3. Pingback: Ursula Haverbeck “The Greatest Problem of Our Time” — TRANSCRIPT | American national socialist

  4. Pingback: Brian Ruhe Show — Monika Schaefer – One Month in the “Free World” – aladdinsmiraclelamp

  5. Pingback: Brian Ruhe Show — Monika Schaefer - One Month in the "Free World", Nov 26, 2018 — TRANSCRIPT - katana17katana17

  6. Pingback: Andrew Hitchcock with Alfred Schaefer - This is Not a Game — TRANSCRIPT - katana17katana17

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.