Byram Campbell – The New Mythology of Racial Equality — Part 2

Posted on December 6, 2019 by admin

[A 1960s tour of the world by an American race realist and how, what he calls, “The New Mythology of Racial Equality” is a highly destructive ideology being foisted upon Whites.

In Part 2, Egypt, Ethiopia and India and their peoples are assessed and compared to Whites.

— KATANA]

Byram Campbell

The New Mythology

of Racial Equality

1963

Part 2 of 3

THE NEW MYTHOLOGY OF RACIAL EQUALITY

DEDICATED TO CHARLES SMITH FOR HIS HEROIC FIGHT TO SAVE THE WHITE RACE

The New Mythology of Racial Equality.

by BYRAM CAMPBELL

THE TRUTH SEEKER COMPANY, INC.

38 Park Row.

New York 8, N. Y. 1963

PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

______________

[Part 1]

The New Mythology of Racial Equality.

A VISIT TO SPAIN
The Spanish People
AN APPRAISAL OF SPAIN

ITALY AND THE ITALIANS
The Italian People

[Part 2]

AN OVERALL LOOK AT AFRICA
Egypt
UPPER EGYPT VISITED
The Egyptian People
Khartoum
AN APPRAISAL OF THE AFRICAN

A RELIGIOUS PEOPLE AND A HOLY CITY
Benaras
INDIA’S CAPITAL AND THE TAJ MAHAL
Delhi
Agra
AN ESTIMATE OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE
The Monuments of India
India as a Civilization

[Part 3]

SOUTHEASTERN ASIANS
Bangkok

HONG KONG

THE BRITISH AND THE FAR EAST

CONCERNING THE JAPANESE

HAWAII AND THE HAWAIIANS

SOME OVERALL CONCLUSIONS

Other Works by the Same Author

______________

The New Mythology of Racial Equality

BEFORE we start seeing the world we should gain some knowledge of the ideas that are throwing it into a ferment; otherwise, its lands emerge in half lights. For better orientation let us look backward to the early part of our century.

Lothrop Stoddard in the preface to his book The Rising Tide of Color (1920) came to the conclusion that since of her values depend on the quality of life Americans would wisely act to protect this value. Neither Stoddard, nor the many who agreed with him foresaw the psychotic forces that would arise dedicated to destroying the moral man’s values as well as our racial heritage. Because of the acceptance of the new beliefs the changes that have occurred are opposite to those forecast by Stoddard.

The ideas which we have mentioned have become Incorporated in a mystique. This we name The New Mythology.

Unless we can gain a knowledge of how this mystique has arisen we shall be handicapped in combating it. Even if given the facts most men do not accept them, for they are usually adequately prepared only to understand other, normal men. Fortunately we can call on a great philosopher for help.

Continue reading →

Posted in Africa, Bk - The New Mythology, Communism, Ethiopia, Eygpt, India, Liberalism, Marxism, Multiculturalism, Muslim, Negros, Pakistan, Political Correctness, Race, Race Differences, Third World, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Byram Campbell – The New Mythology of Racial Equality — Part 1

Posted on December 4, 2019 by admin

[A 1960s tour of the world by an American race realist and how, what he calls, “The New Mythology of Racial Equality” is a highly destructive ideology being foisted upon Whites.

— KATANA]

Byram Campbell

The New Mythology

of Racial Equality

1963

Part 1 of 3

THE NEW MYTHOLOGY OF RACIAL EQUALITY

DEDICATED TO CHARLES SMITH FOR HIS HEROIC FIGHT TO SAVE THE WHITE RACE

The New Mythology of Racial Equality.

by BYRAM CAMPBELL

THE TRUTH SEEKER COMPANY, INC.

38 Park Row.

New York 8, N. Y. 1963

PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

______________

[Part 1]

The New Mythology of Racial Equality.

A VISIT TO SPAIN
The Spanish People
AN APPRAISAL OF SPAIN

ITALY AND THE ITALIANS
The Italian People

[Part 2]

AN OVERALL LOOK AT AFRICA
Egypt
UPPER EGYPT VISITED
The Egyptian People
Khartoum
AN APPRAISAL OF THE AFRICAN

A RELIGIOUS PEOPLE AND A HOLY CITY
Benaras
INDIA’S CAPITAL AND THE TAJ MAHAL
Delhi
Agra
AN ESTIMATE OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE
The Monuments of India
India as a Civilization

[Part 3]

SOUTHEASTERN ASIANS
Bangkok

HONG KONG

THE BRITISH AND THE FAR EAST

CONCERNING THE JAPANESE

HAWAII AND THE HAWAIIANS

SOME OVERALL CONCLUSIONS

Other Works by the Same Author

______________

The New Mythology of Racial Equality

Lothrop Stoddard in the preface to his book The Rising Tide of Color (1920) came to the conclusion that since of her values depend on the quality of life Americans would wisely act to protect this value. Neither Stoddard, nor the many who agreed with him foresaw the psychotic forces that would arise dedicated to destroying the moral man’s values as well as our racial heritage. Because of the acceptance of the new beliefs the changes that have occurred are opposite to those forecast by Stoddard.

The ideas which we have mentioned have become Incorporated in a mystique. This we name The New Mythology.

William James in Pragmatism (1907) called attention to a group to which he gave the name, monists, or as we shall define this term, those dominated by an irrational faith in ideas based on oneness. He brought out the fact that they are subjective thinkers, ruled by their temperaments. In addition to their many a for oneness they have of her characteristics, one of which is of extreme importance in understanding them. For this quality James coined the term tender-minded.

I would judge from James‘ general position that he held extreme monists to be mainly the product of inborn [Page 6] qualities, though he does not clearly so state. Let us be specific. We now know that individuals are born with a temperament fashioned by nature, being a part of their genetic makeup. The monist inherits his qualities.

The normal people who are free from the monist’s mania for reducing everything to oneness, we shall name pluralists.

James, unlike Stoddard, was not trying to catch a glimpse of the future; and this being the case we could not expect him to foreshadow the phenomenal impact that tender-minded monists have had on our age. Therefore, let us take up where James left off.

Continue reading →

Posted in Africa, America, Aryan, Brainwashing, Europe, Evolution, IQ, Italy, Political Correctness, Race, Race - Mixing, Race Differences, Spain, Spanish Inquisition, Third World, Western Civilization, White genocide, White Nationalism | Leave a comment

Morgoth’s Review – My General Election Dilemma – Nov 26, 2019 — Transcript

Posted on November 30, 2019 by admin

[Morgoth discusses whether you should vote or not in the upcoming elections, given that the choice between the main parties is like being offered the choice between a bowl of puke and a turd sandwich!

— KATANA]

Morgoth’s Review

My General Election

Dilemma

Nov 26, 2019

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5a5bRyU-q8

Published on Nov 26, 2019

YouTube Description

Buy me a pint here
https://www.subscribestar.com/morgoth…
https://www.patreon.com/Morgoth
https://ko-fi.com/K3K3RSEG

Bitchute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/morg…

Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_0K…

TRANSCRIPT

[00:01]

[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[00:16]

Hello again there folks. So I’ve been thinking for the last couple of days, that I should say something about the General election which is on the way. But the problem is, I mean, you may have noticed if you watch my stuff, that I don’t really get into party politics at all. I’ve been burned out with it! I’m one of these people that wandered off the plantation, after the Brexit fiasco and after watching three and a half years of being ripped off and ignored! It kind of broke the camel’s back and I realized that there is a clear agenda of (((cabal))) and their will, will not be defied!

And so if you vote for a party and they promise to reduce immigration, let’s say, it’s just not going to happen. They’ll just ignore it! They’ll just ignore you!

And in the case of Brexit, well it was an “in” or “out”, and I thought they would show their hand. And I was interested in how they would deal with it, how they were gonna carry that through without flouting the basic rules of a liberal democracy. And with this, that’s actually the story of the last three and a half years.

So all I did was confirm in my mind that democracy is a bit of a farce! You can vote on a policy about NHS beds, or something, and yeah, if that’s your big thing, then whooppee-do! You will be able to use your “power of the vote” to change how many beds exist in an NHS ward, or something like that.

But if it’s for something more fundamental to the current state of Britain, in this case, then you’re not! Then you’ll just be bullshitted and lied to, and your vote will be crushed! And the last three and a half years since Brexit has been, that’s been the story of it.

And I’ve came to the conclusion that I didn’t really want to play a ball with this farce anymore. Because it gets to the point where if you’re gonna carry on believing in the theater, you feel like a bit of a moron! You feel like a mug! Because you are then actively participating in this system, which is just a sham! Which is just rubbish! And so you feel like a bit of a muppet for going along with the lies!

And I decided that the moral position was to opt out and say:

“I don’t believe the system works, and I’m not gonna endorse it anymore! I’m just gonna opt out and we’ll see how all of this plays out.”

So now we look at the current situation where we’ve got yet another General election and we see that the parties lining up and all of that patter is coming out. And I watched a couple of days ago, I watched Academics Agent’s video on Jeremy Corbyn — the Labour Party’s manifesto — just out of interest. And I was actually quite horrified by how far they’re going. I expected heavy taxes. I expect a Corbyn to go after the CEOs and all of that. But what left me quite mortified was the social policy.

Let me just take a couple of steps back here, because some of my friends on the hard Right will back Corbyn, because they know there’s a certain clique who can’t stand him. And then there’s also that they see him as a wrecking ball against the neoliberal, global capital, let’s say. And with his overt, like communistic, socialist policies. He’s gonna lend 850 billion pounds, or something like that. And so it’s a fair argument.

My problem is if he’s gonna blow up the banking system, or whatever the hell it is, then all right fair play. But the problem that I have is the social policy. And as for taxing all of these CEOs and what not, to death, well they’re just gonna take their money! They’re just gonna leave Britain and the wider system will still be intact. All that’s gonna happen is that the so-called “White van man” is gonna be crucified by these taxes! And so you see where there was somebody on [05:01] “Question Time” talking, and he earns 80 grand a year. He was obviously lower middle class, or working class. He probably owned a factory somewhere, probably works about 70 hours a week. And then he was quite shocked to discover that he was actually in the 5%. And that they were gonna absolutely nail him on taxes! And so that’s this huge chunk of middle England, that are gonna have to pay for Corbyn’s socialism.

But then, the problem is the money. It’s not gonna work in the way that some people on the Right think, because the money is not gonna trickle down to a cohesive group. So you can’t think of it in terms of pushing socialism, or the Swedish model of the 1970s where you’ve got to have a very high trust society, and everybody’s watching each other’s backs. It’s a very comfortable, safe, society and people don’t mind paying a huge chunk of taxes.

And the reason you’re not gonna get that is, because the neoliberal social policy is mass immigration and what the centrists would call “identity politics”, pitting one group against another. And everybody’s against each other. Everybody’s aggrieved. Everybody is out for themselves! And this has resulted in the native demographic of atomization and everybody being out for themselves.

And so, I can actually understand it in that context why they’re gonna go and vote Tory. And on this the point here is that Corbyn’s regime is going to be absolutely savage! And so to get back to my original point of not voting, is it then the moral position to remain aloof from the system when you can see these lunatics coming in? Because I just don’t buy this argument that it will upset the, …. It will open up a gap for dissident politics. The dissident politics is going to be extreme neoliberal, socialist, policies! And Corbyn’s out there now saying there’s gonna be much more “White guilt” dripped into the classrooms!

And on top of all of that, it’s the equivalent to having Antifa run your country! That’s what we’re looking at here. And I don’t see how there’s gonna be any kind of opening for a dissident politics of the Right, whatsoever! In fact, when you look at who’s gonna be prominent within the party, those of us in Britain will be lucky not to be in jail by the time we get through it all! Because it will be like having the Unite Against Fascism, or Antifa running the country.

And so to get back to my original point then. Can you still be noble while you see these lunatics taking over the society? They’re in the running to come out on top. Is it a moral position to still do nothing? Even though — and this is what I have to stress, this point — even though the Tories are scumbags themselves? Even though the Tories are just again these neoliberal shills, but then purely in economics. But as far as something like immigration is going, it doesn’t make blind bit of difference! You’re gonna get 300,000, or 400,000 regardless of who comes in, even Corbyn, I think.

And the reason for that, is that I think we are running at maximum capacity for what we can actually handle. I think the system, because we take in the equivalent of a Normandy landing, like every six months, or something. It’s insane! And in terms of just housing and infrastructure, there’s only a certain amount of people can be processed. And I mean, they talk about capping mass immigration, in actual fact, the system works flat-out to facilitate them coming in by the hundreds of thousands! It’s streamlined to perfection! What people call “The Replacement”. And yeah, that’s gonna happen regardless. Corbyn and the Labour Party may want more, they may want to increase the numbers, but I don’t think it’s physically possible, because there’s just nowhere for people to live. And you’re gonna get the same under the Tories! So that’s actually a moot point.

But in terms of nailing our people to the floor and having what Jeremy Corbyn calls, “Social Justice Commissions” operating up and down the land, and then attaching [10:00] themselves to people’s businesses, controlling everything that people think and do. You are beginning to see something quite horrific coming into view here! So then this tests my original idea of saying:

“Well politics is a big scam! It’s a big joke!”

Like the neoliberals, the money lenders, the top brass, will just move themselves and their assets, their money, and probably their businesses, away from Britain. But we’re still gonna get the transgender issues, we’re still gonna end with all of these racial and ethnic issues. And we’re still gonna have the kids taught “White privilege theory”. It’s just going to be much, much, worse! You’re still gonna get the neoliberal social policy, just the money will have gone.

And so then, you look at the devastation that all of this is going to cause, is it right to say:

“Well, I’m not gonna vote?”

Even though — and this is where they get you again — even though, you know, that the party you’re gonna have to vote for — whether it’s Farage’s crew, or whether it’s the Tories with Boris Johnson — you know they’re a bunch of scumbags who hate you as well! It’s just that they don’t hate you too extent that the the Labour party does.

So this then is the culmination of the great idea of “democracy”, is that out of blind panic you have to vote for the scumbags who hate you least! And this is where we are now.

And so the problem that I have is that you’re then validating the system! You know, that it’s theater, you know, that nothing positive is gonna come out of this for you! And what you want! You, all right there, if you’re watching this video the world that you’d like to see is neigh on illegal. And anybody who holds your opinions will be purged before they get anywhere near political power! So what you have to do was vote for the scumbags who hate you least! And this is where we are. This is the “Great experiment”.

So you can say:

“Well, I’m just not gonna partake in it anymore, and watch the world burn, or wait for the Antifa government to come after you.”

Which in my case they’ll probably do. But as far having some sort of positive ideal is complete, complete, tosh! It’s not gonna happen. And so you’re dragged back in! You’re like Al Pacino in “The Godfather Three”. Just when I thought I was out of this madness, just when I thought:

“Well, you know what it is? I’m giving up on it. I don’t believe in democracy anymore! And I don’t want a validate the system by voting in it!”

Then all of a sudden you find that if you don’t, you’re gonna be having the Social Justice Commission come after you for “hate thought”. And so, you’re forced back into the mold of voting in this complete farce! Because it’s beginning to take a bit of a sinister turn. You’ll never get anything positive. What you’ll get is maybe to stave off the most destructive elements of social justice and cultural Marxism, for a little bit longer. Five years down the road, it doesn’t matter, because the Tories probably have those policies anyway. That’s just what happens, with cuckservatism. So, you’re treading water, or you bite the bullet and say:

“Let’s go for it! Let’s do this the “accelerationist” take, which people will say.”

So that’s another argument which you see on the Right. Where, yeah:

“We know it’s gonna be a madhouse, let’s just get it done and maybe everybody will wake up.”

Well the problem with having Antifa in government is that they’re not going to allow any kind of grassroots movement to form. They’re gonna hunt us down with a vengeance, if they get in! And maybe all of the native population will go through hell, and after five years there’s so much dissent in the country of five years of Corbyn, or whatever, that they’re all desperate to vote for the extreme far Right!

You’ll probably see that somebody like UKIP, or For Britain, will see this bump in popularity, if they don’t get banned. But by and large, it will be people who are desperately running back to the Tories, because they’ve got to try and pay off a mortgage. That’s where this is going to go.

And so we’re forced back into this, this theatre! This illusion of democracy! It’s the choice [15:01] between a bowl of puke and a turd sandwich!

And I think, with a very, very, heavy heart I’m gonna have to go and take a slurp on the bowl of puke! Because the consequences of the Corbyn government getting in is something quite quite awful and shocking!

So, that’s my thoughts on the election there, folks. And it’s not particularly happy, or uplifting, but I can’t, I don’t really see any other way out of it.

Well, alright, let’s try and look at the bright side! [chuckling] Well maybe we will get Brexit, again? Like a carrot dangling before a donkey! That is what it is. A farce! Just a big circus! And if you don’t take part in it you’ll get destroyed, if you do the decline we’ll just take a bit longer.

Thanks for listening folks, and I’ll catch you later.

[16:05]

[Outro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[16:37]

END

============================================

PDF Notes

* Total words = 2491

* Total images = 3

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Nov 30, 2019 — Published post.

Posted in Antifa, BREXIT, Britain, Cuckservatives, Globalism, Jeremy Corbyn, Jew World Order, Jewish Supremacism, Jews - Hostile Elite, Marxism, Morgoths Review, Multiculturalism, Muslim, Race, Third World Immigration, Thought Crime, Traitors - Journalists, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, White genocide, White Nationalism | Leave a comment

Morgoth’s Review – What If Classic Liberalism Is The Problem? – Oct 29, 2019 — Transcript

Posted on November 2, 2019 by admin

[Morgoth describes how classic liberal ideas and their current expression have failed us and have led us to a “clown world” where not only has nonsense — such as transgenderism and other sexual perversions — been promoted, but the whole, society destroying, multicultural agenda has been facilitated.

Liberal ideas chain and blind us to a system that enslaves us to the machinations of a (((cabal))) intent on destroying us, while its gatekeepers such as the smooth talking homosexual Douglas Murray misdirect by describing the ongoing murder of Europe by the cabal and its “goy” traitors, as a “strange death”!

— KATANA]

Morgoth’s Review

What if Classic Liberalism

is the Problem?

Oct 29, 2019

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qhybRpTllI

Published on Oct 29, 2019

YouTube Description

Buy me a pint here
https://www.subscribestar.com/morgoth…
https://www.patreon.com/Morgoth
https://ko-fi.com/K3K3RSEG

Bitchute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/morg…

Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_0K…

TRANSCRIPT

[00:00]

[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[00:15]

Hello there again folks. So there’s been another report out this week on the radicalization happening on YouTube. They call it “The Disease of Far-right Ideas Permeating the Platform”. The report says that since 2017 there’s been a drop in views to far-right channels, but classic liberals, safe conservatives, and the “Intellectual Dark Web”, they’re all doing very nicely. And I mean, that’s going to happen. If the system funnels a lot of money and publicity into a false opposition, and then shuts down the genuine opposition, it will have that effect! If you’re gonna play a game of tennis and you chop off your opponent’s arms, then guess what? You win!

And Sargon of Akkad did a video saying that the report was a good reason why he shouldn’t be banned. That the centrists can “hold the line”. The centre will hold them! That classic liberalism and soft conservatives act as a bulwark. And if they get banned, well the far-right is just gonna run rampant all over the platform.

But these discussions are always framed in a certain way. It’s always a question of whether, or not the center can hold, and not whether, or not, it should hold! We’re told that democracy is a wonderful thing, yet nothing that we discuss, or are concerned about was ever voted on! Multiculturalism was imposed on us without a single mandate! Where was classic liberalism then? In actual fact, it’s arguments based on rationalism, economics, and individualism, were being used to actively facilitate the multicultural project! After all, if we’re all just rational individuals with no interests beyond material gain, then what does it matter where somebody comes from?

Continue reading →

Posted in Bk - Strange Death of Europe, Europe, Globalism, Hate Speech, Jew World Order, Jews - Tool of, Liberalism, Morgoths Review, Multiculturalism, Propaganda - Anti-German, Slavery, Third World Immigration, Transcript, Uncategorized, White genocide | Leave a comment

Laura Towler – We Were Never Asked – Oct 24, 2019 — Transcript

Posted on October 28, 2019 by admin

[Laura Towler and a team of volunteers recently conducted a survey of over 2,000 White British on their opinion on the non-White invasion of Britain that has been occurring in ever greater numbers since the arrival of blacks on the SS Empire Windrush in 1948. The vast majority of White British have always been against this invasion and remain so today, as this survey confirms.

The British people have never been asked whether they wanted this invasion, for the simple reason that they would have rejected it out of hand. Instead, it has been imposed top-down by traitorous “political elite” scum that does the bidding of the (((Money Power))) with the agenda of “genociding” Whites — turning them into despised minorities in their countries — in order to bring about a jewish “New World Order“.

— KATANA.]

_______________________

We Were Never Asked!

Laura Towler

Oct 24, 2019

Click the link below to view the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDOW2refPPU

Also on Bitchute:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JDOW2refPPU/

YouTube Description

Published on Oct 24, 2019

To support my work (from $1 per month): https://www.subscribestar.com/laura-t… – Thank you!

For more information:

WeWereNeverAsked.co.uk
WeWereNeverAsked.com
WeWereNeverAsked.net

Sources:

British Attitudes to Immigration: https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/2011/brit…

2001 Government Census: https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2001cen…

2011 Government Census: https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census

Net Migration Figures: https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/stat…

Fertility Rates 1: https://iussp2009.princeton.edu/paper…

Fertility Rates 2: https://www.demographic-research.org/…

School Pupils by Ethnic Group: https://assets.publishing.service.gov…

Live Births by Ethnic Group: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…

White Britons ‘will be minority’ by 2066, says professor: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne…

Category
News & Politics

YouTube Stats

Jun 10, 2020 — Comments = 4,258 — Views = 97,795 — Like = 9,300, Dislikes = 240

Nov 2, 2019 — Comments = 3,066 — Views = 55,156 — Like = 6,500, Dislikes = 73

Oct 28, 2019 — Comments = 2,356 — Views = 40,054 — Like = 5,200, Dislikes = 49

__________________________

Part One — The Current Situation

Part Two — The Sample

Part Three — Question One

Part Four — Question Two

Part Five — Volunteer Interviews

Part Six — Final thoughts

TRANSCRIPT

(37:54)

[00:01]

[Screen text]

The following short film (and it’s supporting website) was made by volunteers.

We did not receive any outside funding for this project.

I would like to take this opportunity to say thank you to everybody who helped collect the data, helped with the website, or provided any other form of support.

And lastly, of course, I would like to say thank you to Mark Collett.

This project would not have been possible without you all.

Part One — The Current Situation

top

Laura: Since the end of World War Two immigration has always been a hot topic for Britain. It is regularly given a prominent position in party manifestos, in our newspapers, on TV talk show panels, and across social media. It tops opinion polls as one of our greatest concerns. And it can even be argued that it was a key factor in one of Britain’s largest historical democratic exercises to date; our decision to leave the European Union.

Continue reading →

Posted in Brainwashing, BREXIT, Britain, England, Family - Anti, Globalism, Jew World Order, Jewish Supremacism, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Tool of, Karlergi Plan, Laura Towler, Mark Collett, Multiculturalism, Muslim invasion, New World Order, Political Correctness, Propaganda, Race, Race - Mixing, Traitors - Journalists, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, We Were Never Asked, Western Civilization, White genocide, White Nationalism, YouTube | 18 Comments

Millennial Woes at the Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Posted on October 22, 2019 by admin

[Millennial Woes delivers a good speech at the Scandza Forum held in Copenhagen on Oct 12, 2019. His topic was on the delusion of egalitarianism that our corrupt “elites” promote and the necessity for them to lie to the public about their real agenda.

He is optimistic that we can succeed in turning the public to our ideas despite the generations of brainwashing that they have suffered with. He says:

“But! We do enjoy an advantage which our opponents 70 years ago lacked. They were working against the public, at every level, and against human nature! We are not! Indeed, this is why they had to be sneaky and subversive. Had they proffered their ideas openly in 1946, the public would have rejected every single one of them.“

— KATANA.]

_______________________

Scandza Forum

Copenhagen 2019

Millennial Woes

Click the link below to view the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46amg4OanUM

YouTube Description

Millennial Woes’ speech “Regenerate Against the Machine”, at the Scandza Forum in Copenhagen in October 2019

Published on Oct 16, 2019

18:28

Category
News & Politics
220 Comments

__________________________

TRANSCRIPT

(18:28)

[00:01]

Woes: All right! Hello everyone. Okay, so first of all thank you to Frodi for organizing this conference and inviting me to speak. I would also like to thank a Sikh friend of mine. I have very few of those as you might imagine, so y’all know who he is, for giving me some ideas for this speech. Now, in 2004 the public intellectual Paul Graham wrote the following:

“Changes between the past and the present, sometimes do represent progress. In a field like physics if we disagree with past generations, it’s because we are right and they are wrong! But this becomes rapidly less true as you move away from the certainty of the hard sciences. By the time you get to social questions, many changes are just fashion.”

And we see this with that, I mean, I don’t think I even need to illustrate this, that clearly a lot of attitudes are that we have today, that are popular today are not based on rationality, or logic, or whatever. It’s simply a change as a people — it is just fashion, trends, fads! People have been persuaded that X is better than Y, but there’s no actual reason for it, or indeed it might be a trick. It might be were there being actively deceived into advocating something that’s bad for them.

And it is interesting sometimes when you see this open contradiction where something that, like, for example, the border wall with Trump. Apparently that’s the worst thing the worst idea the most evil idea in the world! But Democratic politicians were advocating the very same thing ten years ago. I believe Hillary Clinton actually advocated it, and, or Obama, but I’m not sure about that. And in gay marriage, at the start of his presidency Barack Obama opposed gay marriage. But then within a few years it was suddenly an absolute essential that, of course, we have to have gay marriage. Amazing!

However Paul Graham says that this does not happen in the hard sciences, such as physics. But actually that’s not true, because even the hard sciences are affected by fashion. And the other day I was listening to an interview with Douglas Murray and he was talking about the transgender issue. And he said that:

“For the first time science is being invited to lie, because saying that gender is performative, women are not naturally feminine, and so on.”

But actually and, he’s saying that for the first time scientists are being invited to lie, to bolster a social trend. But honestly that’s not true. This is not the first time. For at least 50 years science has been invited to lie about the question of race, the existence of race. And that’s had interesting consequences all over the place. So, also now, possibly climate change. I don’t know what any of you believe about climate change, but it does seem like something that’s been co-opted by progressive forces. And now if you dare to question it, you’re risking a lot. So it’s no longer a question of logic and rationality. It’s no you are expected to believe this thing, regardless of what objections you might have to it. So yes, even the hard sciences are subject to this. So Paul Graham continues:

“Swear words are part of the English language.”

Of course, they are part of every language, but he’s speaking about English:

“So therefore, because swear words are part of the English language, parents are giving their kids an inaccurate idea of the language by not using swear words. Why did parents do this? Because they don’t think it’s fitting that kids should use the whole language. We like children to seem innocent. Most adults, likewise deliberately give kids a misleading view of the world. One of the most obvious examples is Santa Claus. We think it’s cute for little kids to believe in Santa Claus, but one wonders do we tell them, this stuff further for their sake, or for ours?”

That’s Paul Graham. And I thought that was a very [05:00] interesting question.

And I think perhaps it’s the key to understanding why today’s elite are corrupt. I suspect, that a good elite lies to the public. I think every elite inevitably lies to the public. I think it’s just as something that happens. But I think that a good elite lies to the public for the public’s sake. To give them hope, to allow them to simplify things, to allow them to have faith in their society, to enable them to keep going. And I think that a bad elite, lies to the public not for the public’s sake, but for it’s own sake! And the Western elites today, political, academic, media, they lie to the public constantly! Even systematically! And it’s not to benefit the public. Indeed, the lives positively harm the public in the short term, but even more so in the long term.

So, national populism, is a slightly contradictory thing. It is ostensibly the voice of the people, but it is channeled through particular individuals, leaders and intellectuals. A given here is the belief that people need to be led, and that people want to be led. I think the evidence of antifa outside, might back that up. The request that rings out from the public is “Lead us!”. But really this is what the public always asks for. It’s just that most of the time they do it subtly.

People are social creatures wanting to know what the situation is and how to navigate it. And they are hierarchical creatures as well, requiring that the situation and how to navigate it be defined for them by individuals whom they look up to. Very few people want to work everything out for themselves. It’s a difficult thing to do and most people frankly don’t seem to trust their own judgment that much. This is demonstrable. It’s why they seek culture to be guided by. Exemplars to emulate and leaders to follow.

National populism is a call for us to be much more honest about this perennial truth, this situation. The people want leaders who know what their role is, and to take it seriously. The people want leaders who look after them sincerely, who don’t just pertained to. The people want leaders whom they can trust, because the leaders they currently have, they can’t trust! And this applies to political leaders as well as cultural leaders. The commentators and the intellectuals who shaped society.

There is a need for this shake-up, because the leaders we have, and have had for many decades now have fallen into a combination of delusion and dishonesty! G K Chesterton once wrote:

“I can trust the uneducated, but not the badly educated. And today’s elites are very badly educated!”

Believe it, or not, you can be educated away from honesty, away from sincerity, away from common sense, and away from your kith and kin. In fact, these are all prerequisites for being in today’s elites. Meantime, the common people are as they always were, in need of a shepherd to protect them from danger, but also they are able to sense danger sooner than the Shepherd can. The people should listen to their Shepherd, but also the Shepherd should listen to his people and respect their instincts.

Today’s elites despise the instincts of ordinary people! When people today complain of problems their elites answer them with contempt, complacency, and dishonesty! They either deny that the problems exist at all, or they come up with false analyses and dreadful solutions! For example, the elites solution to the problems of diversity, is more diversity! The elites solution to the problems created by feminism, is more feminism! The elite solution to the warping of masculinity into toxic masculinity, is to keep demonizing masculinity! The elite solution to the public’s revulsion at unisex bathrooms, is more unisex bathrooms! Constantly, the elite solution is to keep doing whatever created the problem that now needs to be solved!

The elite do this, because they are sticking to the program that they have been beholden to for decades. [10:01] The truth is, the elite created all of these problems in the first place! Their central sin was to fall into the delusion of egalitarianism. They insisted that everything and everyone is equal, thus nullifying their own station as an elite! They did this while contradictorily pouring scorn on the White working-class. This exposed their lie, that everyone is equal, but it also absolved them of all moral responsibility. They can then say:

“We are not really an elite! Everyone is equal! We are just managers, janitors. We just keep the infrastructure and the economy going! When it comes to morals, ethics, culture, metaphysics, you little people are on your own. You have to decide what is right and wrong! You have to decide how to live! You have to decide what to believe in! And most of all you have to believe in yourself, because everyone is equal!”

This middle class, nouveau riche, nihilistic drivel, it’s what led to the Rotherham scandal in Britain. All morals have been negated! All metaphysics vaporized! All social institutions gutted of authority, prestige, respect, and the ability to function!

And it is this model chaos which leads to the desire for national populism. In short, the people are demanding a new elite, because the old elite are severely dysfunctional! Because they are severely dishonest, because they are severely delusional! They preach equality from a patronizing elitist perspective, while jealously guarding their own status as an elite, and openly despising those who are not in the elite. Calling them low information voters, and uneducated Brexit gammon, etc.

Meantime, the common people though flattered by the lie that everyone is equal, understand instinctually that this is not true, and cannot be true. And they don’t want it to be true either, because they want the comfort of an elite that is looking after them. And then there are people like us, in the dissident right, who advocate a return to elitist values, but on an honest footing. We believe the elite should accept that it is an elite, and that it should be an elite, and that it deserves to be an elite. And that the role of an elite is essential for society to function.

But furthermore, we advocate hierarchy while trying to escape the egalitarian orthodoxy, by demanding an egalitarian approach to freedom of speech, so that we can advocate hierarchy! It’s rather ironic. And so we arrive at the rather surreal situation that we have today. An elitist aristocratic paradigm is being proposed from below using a egalitarianism as it’s vehicle. Meantime an egalitarian paradigm is being imposed from above, using democracy as it’s vehicle, but also using anti-democracy as it’s vehicle. For example, opposition to the Brexit referendum and support for the distant EU Parliament, over local politics. But the egalitarianism is also proposed by using elitism as a vehicle, with ideas like:

“Only stupid people don’t believe in equality! Only stupid people believe that there are any stupid people!”

It’s insane, obviously.

So, it is often said that to combat the progressive elite we need to do our own “long march through the institutions”. There are at least three problems with that.

One they, are hyper aware of us and the threat that we pose. By contrast, the Conservatives whom they usurped seventy years ago, were not worried about them at all. And that’s why those conservatives lost everything.

Two! There isn’t time for another long march through the institutions. They had 70 years. We have maybe 20 years to rescue the West, or least to get onto a good footing again.

And then three. The people that we would be usurping in academia, media, etc., are backed up by not only global corporations, but the governments of virtually every country in the West. Those governments are also very worried [15:02] about us, and are implementing laws to criminalize our ideas. Therefore it is wildly naive to think that we can inject a virus into the system, and the system will calmly allow that virus to take it over. The system is hysterical about us! We are not going to be allowed to be sneaky and subversive! But even if that did happen, as I said, there isn’t time for the virus to do its work. We don’t have 70 years.

But! We do enjoy an advantage which our opponents 70 years ago lacked. They were working against the public, at every level, and against human nature! We are not! Indeed, this is why they had to be sneaky and subversive. Had they proffered their ideas openly in 1946, the public would have rejected every single one of them.

No! We don’t want mass emigration!

No! We don’t want multiculturalism!

No! We don’t want our granddaughters raped by Islamists!

No! We don’t believe that race is a social construct!

No! We don’t believe that male and female are social constructs!

No! We don’t want drag queens teaching our children how to twerk!

No! We don’t believe that everything is relative!

No! We don’t believe that Europe is meaningless, or that we have no special rights to our countries!

No! We don’t believe that Europeans are the cancer of human history!

All of these ideas would have been flatly rejected by the public in 1946. But guess what? They would be flatly rejected by the public in 2019! Even now the progressive elite have to hide their true beliefs from the public. We don’t!

We can be very honest with the public, because we are not opposed to the public. We do not despise the public. We are not trying to betray, trick, replace, or destroy, the public.

We advocates of a new elitism are, though idealistic, grounded in realism. We accept the public as they are.

We accept the old elite as they are. The purveyors of lies, which are creating a perverse and chaotic situation that will culminate with the complete destruction of everything that we hold dear! We accept that egalitarianism is the nullification of everything, and the endangerment of everyone.

And we accept that something desperately needs to change!

Thank you.

[Applause]

[18:01]

END

============================================

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

Total words = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages =

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2: Dec 4, 2020 — Added See Also image and links.

Version 1: Oct 22, 2019 — Published post.

Posted in Brainwashing, Denmark, Europe, Globalism, Hate Speech, Jews - Tool of, Millennial Woes, New World Order, Race, Race - Mixing, Race Differences, Scanda Forum, Transcript, White genocide | 9 Comments

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Posted on October 19, 2019 by admin

[Mark Collett delivers a great speech at the Scandza Forum held in Copenhagen on Oct 12, 2019. His topic was the fraudulent nature of our our so-called democracies where the “popular vote” is only only acceptable if it fulfills the agenda of our hostile “elites“, the internationalist cliques, and their puppet prostitute politicians.

The true will of ordinary people is rejected as something bad and is labelled as “populism” by our rulers, since it is opposed to their real agenda of racially and culturally destroying us Whites.

Mark ends on a defiant note with; “… the will of the European people, will soon be heard by all of these parasites and traitors! Our people will come together! They will rise up as one! Not to ask for the scraps from the table! Not to beg for mercy! But to take back our destiny!“

— KATANA.]

_______________________

Scandza Forum

Copenhagen 2019

Mark Collett

Click the link below to view the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsMctb3E_HQ

YouTube Description

Published on Oct 17, 2019

28:28

Category
News & Politics
172 Comments

__________________________

TRANSCRIPT

(28:28)

[00:01]

Mark Collett: Well hello everyone. I’d firstly like to say how nice it is to be here at another Scandza forum, despite what’s going on outside. And I’d like to thank the wonderful Frodi Midjord for inviting me along today, because it’s so great to come out here and meet all you wonderful people.

Now, I just want to say a few words about Frodi before I begin. Because after arranging a similar event in England, I’ve got to say, it is far more stressful arranging an event like this than you could possibly imagine! It really does push you to your limits. And Frodi always looks so cool, he looks so calm, he looks so collected, despite the circus going on outside, people not being able to get in, all the stressful other things that happen. And when I say stressful “other things”, if any of you have arranged even a smaller event, the stressful “other things” also push you over the edge.

But I think it’s a sign of a true leader, when, under such heavy fire, under such circumstances that would cause normal men to break, he just looks so calm and carries this off so perfectly! So, it really is an honor to know him.

And I’d also like to thank him today, because he said to me before I came, he said:

“Mark, I only want you to speak for 20 minutes.”

And I thought:

“That’s really great! Because I get to fly all the way to Denmark, somewhere I’ve never been, meet all these wonderful people, have dinner with everyone, and I only get to do, or have to do, half the work that I’m usually expected to do!”

And when he asked me to speak about the issue of “populism”, it was something that I could have said an awful lot more about. And it’s something I was very, very, eager to speak about. Because in the last few years the media have been talking about “populism” constantly! About this malevolent specter of “populism” that is rising up! And, it’s casting a shadow across the Western world, across all European nations! And all nations, in fact, which would have been referred to as Western nations, America and Australia too.

And the media have been very, very, very quick to decry populism as this great threat to democracy. As a threat to liberal values, as a threat to freedom of speech, and as a threat to almost Western civilization itself!

So I thought to myself:

“What actually is populism? What does populism mean? What is this threat, that threatens us all, that threatens this wonderful democracy we live in?”

Well, I defaulted to something that isn’t really our friend, to Google, and I asked:

“What is populism?”

And the answer that was spat back at me was:

“A political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups.”

And that made me think:

“Wow! That sounds pretty good, doesn’t it?”

I mean, when you read that, you would think populism would be a good thing! And that the “populist”, the people leading this populist revolution, the people who are actually standing up for ordinary folk, that they would be the heroes. That they would be the good guys! But no! According to the press, according to the media, according to the establishment, we’re, in fact, or the “populist” should I say:

“Are the greatest evil of our time!”

The populists, are in fact, the bad guys! They’re the ones who are threatening everything we hold dear.

[05:01]

Now that’s all a little bit strange, because we’re repeatedly told that we live in a “democracy”. And that’s the key word, because a democracy is a system where the ordinary people are meant to have representation in Parliament. And the key word there, the word that should be underlined in that sentence, is “representation”. Now, democracy is not meant to be a system where you elect someone to tell you what to do. You don’t go to the polling booth to elect someone to tell you how to think, to tell you how to feel. You’re not going to the polling station to elect someone who is meant to impose their will upon you. You’re going there, you’re going to the polling station, you’re marking your little cross in the box, and you’re popping it in the box, because you’re meant to be voting for someone to represent you in Parliament!

And that makes sense, because Parliament is a huge building. It’s a really large building. But it’s not that big. It’s not big enough to hold us all. It’s not big enough, so that we can we’ll just jump into our car travel down to Parliament and have our say when something is happening. Because if we did that, there’d be utter chaos! And there’s far more people in Britain who want to have a say in how the nation is run, than could ever fit into a single building.

So they’ve broken Britain down into constituencies. And in those constituencies the people, the constituents, elect someone to represent their views in Parliament. So each individual constituency sends one person to represent the ordinary people, so that the ordinary people get to have their voices heard. And that really makes sense, because it saves everyone in that constituency having to gang together, get in buses, get in their cars, you know, go down to London to have a say. It all makes perfect sense when you think about it.

But then you look at it and think, well “parliamentary democracy” — this system of electing one person to represent the ordinary people — by its very nature it seems to be exactly the same as the system of populism that the media hates! You know, ordinary people are voting for candidates and the winner of the popular vote, they get elected, they go to Parliament, and then they put forward the opinions of the ordinary people. That does sound like a good system.

But then you think isn’t it rather odd that the press, the media, the establishment, they’re all decrying populism! They’re all attacking the idea of ordinary people being represented in Parliament. They’re attacking the idea that ordinary people should have their voices heard. But at the same time as attacking populism, they’re all saying “democracy is sacred”! Democracy is central to our way of life! They tell us the importance of this wonderful democracy, and how our societies stand above all other societies in the world, because of that parliamentary democracy.

And you’re thinking to yourself:

“None of this adds up. You’ve got democracy on one hand. You’ve got populism on the other. And the media is saying ‘populism’ is bad, yet ‘democracy’ is good, and that they, in fact, opposites!”

But it goes further than that. They’re not just opposites, the politicians, the press, the media, they say populism is actually a threat to democracy! One threatens the existence of the other! And that populism, because he threatens this wonderful democracy, it needs to be curtailed! It needs to be stopped! We need to stop these evil populists from representing the ordinary people, because otherwise our freedom, our liberty, our entire way of life, will disappear as we know it!

And, at this point, I’m sure everyone in the room has got the message. It’s all getting quite clear, that the media attack populism — yet they praise democracy — because democracy in its current form, and populism — two things that should be the same — are, in fact, very different forms of governance. One represents the people, the other ignores the people!

[10:01]

And democracy — the system which is meant to be a system of representation of ordinary people — is now no longer anything to do with representing ordinary people!

So I thought, we should probably dig a little deeper into the terms that liberals use, the terms that are used by the establishment, the media, and the press, and we should look at those terms and we should translate them. We should provide a translation service from “liberal speak” into English!

So we’re going to look at three words, or three terms: “democracy”, the “popular vote”, and “populism”. And we’ll start with the term “democracy”..

Now we all know what democracy should be. We know what it should mean. We know it should be about representation. But what does it mean when that word is being spoken by a liberal? When you hear a liberal say “democracy”, let’s translate that “liberal-speak” into English. Because, when a liberal says democracy, you’re not talking about representation. You’re talking about a system of voting for an out-of-touch “gun-for-hire”. And that’s a very nice way of putting it, because when you say “gun-for-hire”, you think of some kind of Western hero in the Wild West doing something heroic.

So let’s not call them “guns-for-hire”, let’s call them “prostitutes”. [laughter] You vote for a prostitute, and crucially, you don’t vote for the prostitute that you like the best! [laughter] You vote for the prostitute you dislike the least! And that’s a very important point. That’s a crucial part of this process! Because few people still vote for a candidate that they really like. Instead they look at all the candidates and say:

“I really don’t like him, and I don’t like him either, but I really hate him! So I’m gonna vote for him, who I dislike, because it’s better than him over there, who I really hate!”

And that’s what happens in England. You know, you hear people saying all the time:

“Oh the Tories and Labour, I can’t stand any of them! So who did you vote for? Oh I voted Tory. Why? Because I really hate Labour!”

And then, on the other hand:

“Ahh, I’m not a fan of any of those people in Parliament. Well did you vote? Yeah, I voted Labour, because me dad said ‘Never vote Tories, because they’ll be far worse than Labour’.”

And you’re stuck in this system of voting for people that you don’t really want to vote for!

So, you start by voting for the candidate, or prostitute, that you dislike the least. And then that prostitute goes to Parliament on your behalf. But they don’t represent you. But instead they prostitute themselves to big business, to special interest groups, to internationalist causes. And when in Parliament that prostitute sits there, and basically implements whatever they want, what benefits them personally, what benefits their paymasters! And they do all of this regardless of what their constituents want. In fact, once elected most of these prostitutes, actually do the very opposite of what the people who voted for them — the people who voted for that prostitute to represent them — they do the opposite of what those people want!

So in short, what do liberals really mean when they say “democracy”? Well, this is the translation; democracy — in liberal-speak — is a system of electing the prostitute that you dislike the least, so he, or she, can then represent the interests of someone else, often to your detriment!

Now we’ll move to definition two, the “popular vote”. Now everyone knows what the popular vote is meant to mean. It’s meant to mean the total number of votes cast. It’s meant to mean all the people who go to the polling station to put their little mark, little cross, in the box, and pop their little a piece of paper in the ballot box.

Now again, this is very strange, because the vast, vast, majority of people who go to the polling station to put their little piece of paper in the box, who are those people? Well you’ve probably guessed it. They are actually ordinary people. The vast majority of people who vote, are ordinary people. But this isn’t “populist”, this is the “popular vote”.

So what’s the difference between ordinary people voting for something, and that being populism, and the popular vote? Well in the liberal system of democracy, the people are, of course, not voting for what they actually want, they [15:01] are presented with a narrow selection of candidates, narrow selection of options, which are all pre-approved and pre-chosen by the establishment.

So you can clearly see that it’s only “populism” when people get to vote for someone who they actually like! Who they actually want to vote for, who actually stands up for the ordinary people. In liberal-speak the vote is only popular and democratic when the person elected doesn’t represent the people who elected them! You see “popular” is always seen as good. When the press talk about popular it’s always good. But it’s only good, it’s only right, it’s only the correct thing, when “popular” chooses the right candidate, when it chooses the candidate that the establishment, the internationalists, and the media want.

So, when a voter elects a candidate who wants open borders, who wants to flood us with low IQ migrants, who wants to put GDP on a pedestal, who wants us all being attacked in the street by people who shouldn’t belong here, well, when somebody votes them in, that’s “popular”! Democracy’s triumphed! We all give ourselves a pat on the back! We cheer! What a wonderful system we live in! And the media and the press, they all congratulate themselves, they congratulate the system. And we are told by these people that we should all honor that result. And whatever the prostitute who’s been elected wants to do, we should adhere to that with slavish devotion! Because the popular vote has triumphed, and that is the will of the people.

So if the current ruling prostitutes let’s in those millions of low IQ migrants who create chaos, we have to sit there clapping like seals! We have to applaud it! We have to say it was the right thing, because the prostitute who is doing this, or the group of prostitutes, they won the popular vote!

So those low IQ migrants flooding our towns and cities, well, that’s what we wanted, isn’t it? That’s the will of the people! But, if one of these populists, one of these awful threats to democracy, ends up on the ballot paper and the people do the unthinkable and elect them into Parliament, or a regional body, and they elect somebody that really represents them.

If the ordinary people elect someone who actually represents them! Democracy has failed! Democracy has failed us all and the vote must be recast, or the candidate must be impeached, or we must have a second run at the referendum! And we’ll keep having a second run, in fact, we’ll have a third run, we’ll have a do-over, and we’ll do it again, and again, and again, until the establishment, and the media, and the press, get the result they want!

Because, the result is only “smiled upon” when the people make the “right choice”, when they elect the “right candidate”. When people elect the “right candidate”, it’s “popular”! When people elect the “wrong candidate” it’s “populism”! Do you see what they’re doing there? “Popular” is good, “populism” is evil.

And that takes us on to the third and final definition. Which is, of course, “populism”. Populism is the final piece of this puzzle it’s the final part of this interesting use of language. In reality, populism; the will of the people. It’s what ordinary people want. And it means true representation of people at grassroots level. It means talking about issues that ordinary people care about. It means saying:

“We don’t want loads of low IQ foreigners flooding our lands, and taking our jobs, and raping young girls in Rotherham, in Telford.”

It means talking about these grooming gangs and saying:

“Why aren’t the police doing something about it?”

It means saying:

“The EU hasn’t been a good thing for our people.”

It means talking about all the issues that we speak about! And the issues we speak about, are the same issues that normal people, in their homes, on a daily basis, talk about when they know they’re not being listened to by people who might report them to bodies and groups that want to shut up the ordinary people! And ultimately it means electing candidates who are free. [20:00] Who do not serve special interest groups. Who do not serve minorities. Who do not serve shady (((financiers))), or media hacks. It means electing people who are free of the strings that are attached to the claws of the (((internationalist clique))) !

You see, once the riddle of democracy, the popular vote, and populism, is all translated, once the “liberal-speak” is put into plain English, it becomes very, very, clear as to why the media and the press and the establishment hate populism so much, and why they’re so viciously opposed to it. They hate populism, because populism is actually true democracy. It’s the will of the people! And ultimately the media, the establishment, and the internationalists, do not want the will of the people to be expressed! Because the will of the people is a threat to their power!

And from the very beginning of this speech, I’ve kept using one phrase, and that’s “ordinary people”. And a theme has emerged throughout this short speech, a theme of the media and of the establishment wishing to take away the voice of the ordinary people! And ensuring that ordinary people don’t have a say. That the wishes of ordinary people are not represented!

And why is that? Well, quite simply, those who run the media, the internationalist clique pulling the strings of the prostitute politicians, they are not ordinary people! In fact, they hate the ordinary people! And they do not want the ordinary people to take their destiny into their own hands. Because what is good for the ordinary people, is not good for those who run the media, for those within the establishment, for the internationalists! And the opposite is true. What is good for the internationalists, what is good for those in the media, what is good for those in the establishment, is not good for ordinary people!

But, I still haven’t got to the bottom of this. I keep saying “ordinary people”, but who are the “ordinary people”? Who are the people having their will suppressed, the ones the internationalists want to control and deny a voice? Who are the people being disenfranchised, the people being turned into second-class citizens? Well, those people are the indigenous people of Europe! They are the people of European descent. They are us!

And the establishment, the media, the internationalists, they want to deny us a voice, because they hate us! They hate those of European descent! And what’s more, they want us gone! They want us bred out of existence and replaced in our own ancestral homelands! Thus, the internationalists have fashioned a system to do away with us. And they call it “democracy”! And they tell us we have a choice. But every time we choose something they don’t like, every time we vote outside of their narrow list of options, they go beserk and they decry our choice as “populism”! Because their system of democracy doesn’t present real choice. Because it was never intended to present real choice!

The so called “liberal democracy” presents the illusion of choice! Because the key to all this, is when you believe you are free, when you have the illusion of choice, you are much less likely to rebel! You’re less likely to try to break free from the cage that has been built around you! And wouldn’t that be the greatest kind of bondage, the greatest kind of cage? A prison where the inmates believed that they were, in fact, free and had a choice! And that’s the truth of the matter. The democracy that is promoted by the media and the establishment is just another tool of control! Just another way of ensuring that those of European descent will never be free!

[25:00]

But amongst all the liberal doublespeak, amongst all the babble, there is one truth. Our enemies do speak one truth. And that is that populism threatens their illusion of democracy! Populism threatens to wipe away their corrupt system, and do away with the political prostitutes that rule over us! Populism threatens to set our people free! Because populism is the will of the people, not the will of the internationalist clique!

And that begs a question. What is the will of the people? What is the will of our people? What do those of European descent want? What do we want so much that the internationalists fear and hate so much? Well, we want the one thing that they will never accept! We want to exist! We want to prosper! We want to celebrate our culture, our traditions, and our heritage! We want a future in our ancestral homelands, and we want a future for our children!

And the reason the internationalists, and their puppet politicians, are making so much noise about populism, is because they are scared! They’re scared that our people have started to stir! That our people are starting to speak up! And maybe, you can hear it. It may have started as a whisper, as a murmur, amongst the crowds, but the voice of the European people is getting louder! And more, and more, of us are daring to stand up! More and more of us are ready to be heard! Ready to stand up against the establishment, and dare to speak the words that are becoming the act of defiance of our age!

And the popular will of our people, the act of defiance, the will of the European people, will soon be heard by all of these parasites and traitors! Our people will come together! They will rise up as one!

Not to ask for the scraps from the table! Not to beg for mercy! But to take back our destiny! And to state clearly and unequivocally that we will not be replaced!

Thank you.

[loud applause and cheering]

[28:07]

END

============================================

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages =

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Oct 19, 2019 — Published post.

Posted in Bk - The Fall of Western Man, Britain, Denmark, Europe, Globalism, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Tool of, Karlergi Plan, Mark Collett, Media - jewish domination, Multiculturalism, Muslim "Grooming" Gangs, Muslim invasion, Nationalism, Propaganda, Scanda Forum, Speech, Traitors - Journalists, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, Uncategorized, Western Civilization, White genocide, White Nationalism | 125 Comments

Red Ice TV – Extinction Rebellion, Our Future of Bugs and Pods – Morgoth’s Review – Oct 10, 2019 — Transcript

Posted on October 12, 2019 by admin

[Red Ice’s Henrik interviews Morgoth, of Morgoth’s Review, on the current “astro-turf” psyop operation called “Extinction Rebellion“, no doubt financed by Orgjew organizations, such as Soros, and others, that allows young people to “rebel” by prancing and dancing around in defense of a global tyranny.

— KATANA.]

_______________________

Red Ice TV

Extinction Rebellion

Our Future of Bugs and Pods

Morgoth’s Review

Click the link below to view the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPoKCjNP_Ho

YouTube Description

Published on Oct 10, 2019

51:04
#ExtinctionRebellion #ClimateScare #Bugs
Extinction Rebellion, Our Future of Bugs & Pods – Morgoth’s Review
7,182 views
•Oct 10, 2019
785
14
Share
Save
Red Ice TV
334K subscribers

Morgoth’s Review joins Henrik to talk about the many issues facing the United Kingdom. We begin on the Extinction Rebellion, a new climate weapon the globalists use to get even more money, power and influence. We talk about the promotion of bug eating and pod living. In the second part we discuss demographics, Islamization of England, rise in knife crime, corporate support of milkshake activism and Brexit.

Guest links:
http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.com
https://youtube.com/channel/UCzIe02cU…
https://twitter.com/livesmorgoth

***************************************************************
Sign up for a membership at 👉🏻https://redicemembers.com. Get full access to our extensive archives, watch or listen to all our shows. Stream or download over 1800 programs, including radio shows, videos, TV segments & our live show Weekend Warrior. You get access to exclusive videos. All new videos are made available to members first.

***************************************************************
👕 Get Our New T-Shirts Here: https://redice.tv/store

***************************************************************

❤️ SHOW US SOME LOVE ❤️ HELP US GROW ⚡️

⭐️ Donate:
Cash.App: https://cash.me/$redicemembers
Donorbox: https://donorbox.org/red-ice
Swish (Sweden): 076 815 68 01

Donate Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies:
BTC: 1CfFFSB3aJqPtynJhsVvK5xm3UAJHNsvZ6
BCHABC: 1CfFFSB3aJqPtynJhsVvK5xm3UAJHNsvZ6
ETH: 0x93af71a3d5bf92e859b05b9e0de0f1985a2c9ce5
LTC: LdyptdN7XyqD6jGYUiTVA9RbiP5vBGADmc
BAT: 0x93af71a3d5bf92e859b05b9e0de0f1985a2c9ce5
XRP: rEb8TK3gBgk5auZkwc6sHnwrGVJH8DuaLh
XRP Deposit Tag: 103245046

Want to donate another crypto? Email us at redice@protonmail.com and we can provide wallet address for virtually any crypto.

Watch our content on the Brave Browser and support us with BAT (Basic Attention Coin)
🌐 Get Brave via our affiliated link: https://brave.com/red091

Thank you for your help! We can not continue without your support.

Send mail or donations to Henrik or Lana:
1866 C. Market St PMB 315
Harrisonburg, VA 22801
USA

***************************************************************

🔗 More Red Ice: https://redice.tv
🔗 Red Ice Members: https://redicemembers.com
🐦 Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/redicetv
👍🏻 Like us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/RedIceCreations
📰 RSS feeds: https://redice.tv/rss
✈️ Join our Telegram group: https://t.me/redicetv
🇷 Join Riot Chat rooms: https://riot.im/app/#/group/+redice:m…
📺 Follow us on Dlive: https://dlive.tv/redicetv
🖼️ Follow us on Instagram: https://instagram.com/redicemedia
💡 Follow us on Minds: https://minds.com/RedIceTV
🎤 Listen to us on Spreaker: https://www.spreaker.com/show/red-ice…
📺 Subscribe to our main YouTube channel Red Ice TV: https://www.youtube.com/user/RedIceRa…
📺 Subscribe to our backup YouTube channel Red Ice Media: https://www.youtube.com/user/RedIceMe…
📺 Subscribe to our BitChute channel: https://www.bitchute.com/redicetv/

***************************************************************

Thank you so much for your support!

#ExtinctionRebellion #ClimateScare #Bugs
Category
News & Politics
308 Comments

__________________________

TRANSCRIPT

(51:04)

[00:02]

Henrik: Well ladies and gentlemen welcome back thank you so much for joining us today Henrik here with Red Ice TV. Today with another great show for you lined up with Morgoth’s Review. He’s a gentleman that I’ve tried to get on the show for some time. Actually a really good video made by Aaron Kasparov back, maybe two years ago, maybe even more. I forget when it was. And it was an article written by Morgoth’s Review about — essentially to boil it down into the most simplest sense — Sargon’s promotion of individualism, versus the efficacy of collectivism, or how the collective can operate against the individual.

We might have some time to talk about that later, but that’s kind of an argument that wasn’t that prominent at the time but it has since been. So maybe a little bit less urgent to discuss that, if you will. But anyway, Morgoth, great to have you with us today! How’s everything on your end?

Morgs: I’m doing very well thanks. Thanks for having me on. It’s nice to finally appear on Red Ice, because I was a little bit, just used to blogging in the past and not doing audio and things. But I’m a lot more comfortable with it now

Henrik: Nice. Yeah, of course, you do, you have a in addition to your blog, you do have a YouTube channel now. You do YouTube videos.

How regularly? Like one every week, every other week? What would you say.

Morgs: About two a week. It depends on unlike real life work and stuff

Henrik: Yeah

Morgs: But I go for trying, even when I was just doing the blog, I would always try and get something substantial out for the weekend. And the reason why I started doing YouTube videos was because it was easier to turn on a mic and sort of talk for a little bit, than blogging.

Like writing was actually hard work when you added it, and on top of doing a normal job, actually writing a 1,000 word article twice a week, was quite a lot. And I thought on YouTube I can just kind of speak it. And it was after I went on Millennial Woes I had some more confidence and decided to do it more. Because I first always worried nobody would be able to understand what I was saying, because I’ve got a thick North East accent, but it doesn’t seem to matter.

Henrik: You’re coming in loud and clear? [laughter] we can hear just fine. Now it’s great to have you here, and thank you for doing what you’re doing as well. Some of your videos are magnificent, really good! We’re just talking before we got on here, watching, not you’re absolutely latest one, but the one before that about the “Extinction Rebellion”. And that is something want to talk about as well. But we’re talking about your intro a little bit, which is hilarious! About the theme music which finally, … I called it the first time I heard it was like:

“Oh it’s from Superman.”

But then I Googled it and I couldn’t find it. But it let’s look at this folks, because I think you’ll enjoy it as well. Here it is here. I’ll turn up the volume a little bit here as well so people can hear that. There we go! Look at this

Nice! Alright! [laughter]

Morgs: The whole thing with “Hate Reading the Guardian” was — especially when I was doing the blog — I became kind of used to covering some very, very, heavy (((subjects))) which we can’t really talk about on YouTube now. And it was nice to go from that, to sort of deliberately going for ridiculously low hanging fruit and just rolling with it and having some fun with it. Because you can get bogged down in the really serious stuff. And so I try for like once a month, or something, to look at just the most ridiculous article I can find at the Guardian and then just tear to bits and have a big laugh at it! Because that’s what it deserves. And I think it’s good for morale, as well.

Henrik: Exactly I mean, that’s what it is. Ridicule is a very effective weapon in our arsenal. It’s certainly used by our enemies as well against the things that they don’t like. And it’s now there’s such easy targets, as you say, — it’s amazing that there aren’t more well, you know what? Movies, TV shows? And I mean, it’s even that some of their own are starting to eat each other over the ridiculousness! But it’s a it’s, as you say, it’s a fruit ripe for picking. But anyway, so this is a lot of fun, what you do going into the Guardian and looking at some of their articles, making fun of it and breaking it down. How long have you been doing the blog, though, before we talk about that, before we go into actually stuff about the “Extinction Rebellion“?

Morgs: I started the blog in 20, it was Christmas of 2014 going into 2015. And the reason why I got stuck with [the name] “Morgoth’s Review” was, because I would go on The Daily Telegraph in the comment section and at Brietbart, and I was always, you know, trolling and trying to red pill people under the main articles. But I kept getting banned! And when I would go back I would have a different Tolkien-esque name.

And then, I finally got just tired of being banned and I happened to be on the one called “Morgoth” when I opened up the blog. I thought I want to have a place where I can’t be banned anymore. And I’m learning all of this stuff and I want to just write it on my own blog where I can’t be banned, rather than just sort of fritter it away on all of these comments which just keep disappearing, because they’re being deleted all of the time. And so eventually that’s how it ended up being “Morgoth’s Review”.

Henrik: Is that how you, sorry to interrupt, is that how you got the very thoughtful URL of nwioqeqkdw dot com as well? [laughter]

Morgs: Because I didn’t know what I was doing! With technology, and I tried writing it in and it wouldn’t accept it. And I ended up just mashing me hand into the keyboard! And then that one it did accept! So that’s how great things are born!

Henrik: People should feel fine about searching for Morgoth’s Review, it’s actually the top three results, I was surprised, I’m encouraged by that! That’s great! Google actually spat out your blog, your YouTube channel, and your Twitter account on that

Morgs: Yeah, well it’s not a title that triggers the algorithms really. And to be fair, I’ve always had a very heavy focus on sort of pop culture and movies, and what’s going on in the here and the now, as well.

Henrik: Yes

Morgs: So I’ve tended to fly under the radar quite a lot.

Henrik: All right. Well why don’t we talk a little bit about “Extinction Rebellion”? Obviously you’re in the UK, so that we could talk about some of the things going on over there. I mean, there’s so many things to discuss about, from demographics, to crime, to Islamification, to all these kinds of things.

But one of the bigger movements right now is — well in addition to I guess the Brexit issue that’s happening and we’ll hopefully we can squeeze that into here a bit later — but the “Extinction Rebellion”, the climate craze is just out of control in a lot of Western European countries right now.

The states included unfortunately, you know, this Swedish young girl Greta Thunberg is kind of heading, is really becoming the face of that. I did a video on that too that was going down fairly well. But what can you say about the “Extinction Rebellion” and is it is that something that came out of Britain? I think I’ve seen the most of that particular movement out of the UK, if I’m not mistaken

Morgs: Yeah, well the social media and stuff, they talk about having like what, I don’t know what you’d call them, “cells”, or something, but across 60 countries. But it definitely seems to be centered around London. That’s where the hub is. Which is interesting, because London is like the historical city of the (((money power))) and globalism, and whatnot.

And this is where they’ve chosen to be most prominent. I believe today, or yesterday they’ve shut off an airport. And one of the main airports for London’s being shut down, because of them. And yeah as you see on the screen there, they wear all of this freakish garb and terrify everybody.

But they have largely been mocked, because they don’t look like a grassroots movement. A grassroot movement doesn’t look like that. A grassroots movement has a couple of signs with some with some cheap paint on them. And this looks very professional and also very middle-class by the way.

Henrik: Right.

Morgs: Very, very middle-class! And it’s a bit ridiculous to be honest. Imhr but that I think I mean, I got into it on me me “Guardian Hate Read”. They’re pushing on an open door, because what they’re saying to the elites, is you have to have more power and more control to save the planet. They have arrested quite a few of them. But by and large, it’s seems a bit fake. I mean, last week they had a fire engine which spray-painted this red dye all over, …

Morgs: Yeah, I saw that.

Morgs: … The Exchequer, or something. And then they have obviously never done real work before, because they didn’t understand how to [10:00] handle a high-pressure hose! And it spun out of their hands and went everywhere. But there was like a Channel for News team was on hand to record it all. And you have to ask:

“Well where did you get a fire engine and why did the security services allow you to park it outside of such like one of the most prominent buildings in London?”

Where they wander into the very seat of power in Britain! And Mark Collett said on his show last night, that if it was a nationalist group, or some dissident right-wing group who did that, they’d be called terrorists, and absolutely destroyed by the security forces! And yet in the case of “Extinction Rebellion” the police danced along with them! They actually danced along with it, and get on board! It’s very strange

Henrik: I’m looking for the tweet. There’s one gal on Twitter I think she goes by, yeah “The European Housewife”. Oh there it is. Let me pull that up there to you. Because she had that on her tweet as well. She said:

“My husband is a fireman, and it’s impossible to steal a fire engine. The keys are locked up and have GPS trackers. They know exactly where it is at all times. It’s hard to start up and drive one. Takes special training and we have security. Something is off here.”

In other words, kind of implying that someone on the inside was more than willing to help out in this little stunt.

Morgs: Yeah. It makes you wonder.

Henrik: Yeah. Which kind of goes to the heart of what you’re talking about here. That this is essentially a globalist run promotion, a campaign essentially, to get people to, yes, essentially if we just dive down into the essentials of this. Give up power that’s what they were arguing in The Guardian article too, that you go through, right. We have to have more control! You don’t know what’s best for you, because we’re all gonna die in — I don’t know, what they pick up on this green New Deal story about 12 years I guess as well. We’re all gonna die in 12 years, therefore give us all the control, give us all the money, and we’ll take care of you! We’ll keep you safe! Right?

Morgs: Yeah. Well they are demanding that the elite take that power and then do it. And so in The Guardian article that I went through, Polly Toynbee was actually saying they should ban beef.

And you end up in a situation where we are all going to be put in pods, and we’re all going to have maggot sausages in Mega City One! And Extinction Rebellion is demanding that the global elite actually do that! Now the way to look at this I think, is if you remove that Extinction Rebellion from the equation, and then this is what the global elite want to have happen anyway. It’s all about just making you a unit of consumption and production, living in your pods and eating maggots, maggot burgers.

And then if they were to just come straight out with that, then everybody’s gonna riot in the streets and say this is ridiculous! You know, if the [word unclear] at the European Union, or the head of the IMF for the United Nations, if they said:

“Okay here’s the plan. We are going to ship you all of these megacities and put you in these little pod complexes, and we’re going to put chips in your arms, and have a cashless society. And you just have to work and consume until you die.”

Then everybody would reject the program outright. What Extinction Rebellion does, is add a sort of moral framework to that. So then it becomes the “moral thing” to do. They want to get from A to C, but you have to bring in B, which then adds the moral part of the equation. Because then they can see:

“Oh! We’ve got no choice! We have to do this to save the planet!”

And it becomes much easier when you have a controlled opposition, like Extinction Rebellion.

Henrik: Yes, exactly! But this is what they do, they create movements which you which they, you know, kind of pose as grassroots, or this comes from the people, or whatever. But it’s to say they’re very advanced in terms of the marketing of this, the logos, the flags and everything. And I honed in a little bit on their symbolism as well, which is the hourglass. I think they even release a free paper, by the way, that you can get it. I would assume it’s in the UK called the “Hourglass” which is interesting enough. This theme of:

“We’re running out of time! There is no more time! We have to act now! Don’t think!”

There are no rational thinking about this:

“We’re all gonna die!”

It’s a scare tactic essentially to gain as much power in as quick time as possible. [15:00]

Morgs: And this also has an effect on children

Henrik: Oh yeah.

Morgs: I don’t know if it was in Britain, or not, but there was a young boy actually committed suicide, because — I think it may have been in Britain — he had sort of been saturated in this apocalypse. This idea that the ice is going to melt, the sun’s gonna burn the planet up, we’re all going to die in 12 years! And a lot of children are being completely traumatized by it. And one one young boy committed suicide, because of it — if I’m reading it rightly. And, of course, the more minor part of that would be where the children will then put extra pressure on the parents to support the agenda.

Henrik: Yeah. There’s BBC climate change:

“Twelve years to save the planet? Make that 18 months.”

Lol that was released in July 2019. So they’re certainly not doing anything to mitigate this traumatization of the kids. But the reason why this is so effective as well is, because of “guilt”, right? That’s why they wheel children at the front of this thing. They’re hiding behind the kids, so that they can cry, and scream, and be traumatized by it:

“Mommy! Daddy!”

Or whoever they’re calling on saying:

“Do something! Why are you not doing anything?”

And it guilts the adults into thinking:

“Well, what do we do? What’s the option?”

And then you have the Extinction Rebellion groups out there saying:

“Well just give the elites all the power and things will be great!”

Morgs: I mean, the BBC article, it’s interesting when they released that, because we were having like the summer heat wave at the time. So everybody was walking around in their shorts and the T-shirts with a bottle of water. Everybody was hot and getting sunburned. And then somebody’s decided now was a good time to role this out, this idea that this is going to be the norm. This is a psychological thing where:

“Yeah just look at it now. This is what it’s gonna be like on Christmas Day! And you’ve only got [words unclear]

Henrik: Oh God, it’s pathetic!

Morgs: There was one picture of a man and he was in London, like part of the Extinction Rebellion, and he had a photograph of his two children, and he laid down in the street crying holding the picture of his two children. As if they had both just been killed in some awful accident!

And so a reporter went over and said they’re like:

“What are you doing? What the hell is this?”

And then he just turned around and said:

“Oh, I’m here with a protest. It’s okay. It’s all fine.”

And so [the reporter] said:

“What is it.”

And he said:

“Watch, I’ll show you.”

And then he put his head back down looked at the photo again and started crying! It was all just a theater! Just, it’s ridiculous!

Henrik: Yeah! It’s a show. And, of course, many of these stunts that Extinction Rebellion do on the streets in the UK, is to do “Die-ins”, right? They lay down and die! They have coffins with them, and all this kind of stuff

Morgs: Yeah

Henrik: It’s like a death cult, right?

Morgs: Yeah you can see it even in the clothes that they wear. It is like a death cult. This is the end of the world. And, of course, I mean, this isn’t this isn’t new.

Henrik: No.

Morgs: They’re doing it again but for political ends

Henrik: Yeah exactly. I think it was Dave Vance on Twitter, he was posting a lot of the stuff here, in the last couple of days

They’re doing like dancing to raves things, they’re doing weird things on the streets. And it’s like:

“What are they doing? Who’s this for exactly?”

I think it was this. Let’s turn on the audio on this one. They’re like raving away and this, like [word unclear] and stuff like that here.

What the hell! [laughter] Oh all right, that seems to that seems to fix the climate right there Morgoth!

Morgs: I remember a meme of Oswald Spengler which just has his sort of miserable serious face, and he says:

“I don’t want to say that I told you so, but I told you so!”

Henrik: Yup!

Morgs: [word unclear] kind of materializing through that craziness there. This is where civilizations go to die!

Henrik: That is absolutely correct. I mean, it is interesting in that way. I mean, they don’t, they haven’t picked the death theme, if you will, for the same reasons that we kind of identified them with that as well. But it does interlock in an interesting way, these different positions. That it’s like:

“Yeah it’s the death of our civilization.”

This is peak Western world right now, and he’s obsessed about death and we’re all gonna die. And it’s almost like an embracing of it — I mean, sure they come with this idea, we have to stop it in whatever, but it almost feels like there’s a kind of a “sadistic embracement” of it! You see what I’m getting at?

Morgs: Yeah, I definitely do. I mean, what’s interesting to think of, I mean, I talk about pop culture, because I think and we all know, you know, we all know (((who))) controls it. And well, that’s why it’s interesting to look at this. This dichotomy between is this just something in the zeitgeist, or is this people making decisions — in this case it would be Hollywood studios?

But what I do find interesting is that in the Cold War in the 1950s, 1960s, you had that like 10-minute warning and people genuinely thought that missiles could land and wipe out life on Earth. And that it could happen at any moment. And yet the culture itself would be quite optimistic. So you would you do the “undercover” where you had, again, school kids hiding under their desks, because the Russians might launch their nukes. And people had to live with all this, all of the time. But then they would go through that, and they would watch that there are deals over nuclear warheads, and always images of mushroom clouds wiping out the world. But then they’d go off and watch John Wayne and Mary Poppins have this cinema! [laughter]

It was all relatively, the culture itself was optimistic. Yet today that’s not the case. Today the culture is either this sterile bland pop music, or the Hollywood Machine, which is just relentlessly pessimistic! All of these superhero movies where cities and nations are being wiped out! All of them are like that, you know.

And then we just look at the Joker movie everybody’s talking about. Everything’s rundown and grotty. And so the culture itself is full of doom and gloom in a way that it didn’t used to be.

Henrik: Yeah.

Morgs: There isn’t really an optimistic side to it.

Henrik: Yeah, that’s right. And at the same time, you know, we do have, of course, a lot of material success and stuff. But then you realize it’s not about that either.

And in this case it’s about inventing a plight, right? There’s so many things that various groups do talk about and what should be the primary focus of the culture, like, let’s say demographics, or like low birth rates. These are the disastrous things! Or open borders, or that the globalists are trying to eradicate nations and individual cultures, definitely the West! But all around the world essentially.

And those things should be at the forefront of discussions we should have about how we’re losing control, we’re losing free speech, we can’t say anything anymore! No dissent is allowed. But then this comes along and kind of hijacks the attention of all these other things that’s happening, and this is at the forefront. It’s very bizarre!

Morgs: It’s bizarre, because there is actually a serious discussion to be had about the nature of this technological, globalist, materialistic, society. And, you know, you’ve got to go back to the early nineteen hundred’s to people like Heidegger and Spengler, who are now, of course, very unpopular thinkers. And then you had some others as well. But the general thing was to have people say:

“Oh wait a minute! Where is all of this going to lead? What effect is all of us having on the lived life of people?”

And they were never taken seriously, because there was too much money involved, and you end up where we are now. So the discussion we should have is one of:

“Do we really want to live like this?”

Even with all of the technology that we have, nobody is saying we have to smash the whole machine to pieces, but at least sort of renegotiate how we actually live in it, you know what I mean?

Henrik: Yeah, because there are limits to growth. I mean, this is like the false dichotomy of the Left-Right, the Conservative-Liberal kind of thing that’s going on. Where the Conservatives are like, that’s ridiculous! Yeah economic growth, bringing them all in and convert them to, you know, the Westerners, right? And we’ll economically will do great, kind of thing. They’re trying to shut down our economy!

But it’s like, I’m sorry, but well I’m not sorry, but it’s not going to work forever. This is not gonna function! We are already at the precipice of this, you know, at the height of this population explosion. And at some point either we take charge of this and start to direct things and decide [25:01] where we go, or nature is going to do that for us, right? And at that point if we have a colony collapse, or some kind of disaster, or civil unrest, or something, it’ll be one of the biggest die-offs, I guess that we’ve ever seen in human history! That’s what awaiting us if we just continue on the path that we are on right now.

Morgs: Yeah. And this sort of hands of the zeitgeist, and it had sort of manifests itself in pop culture.

I mean, the last Godzilla movie fascinated me about what it was actually saying, in effect, it was where the old gods from the mother earth, Godzilla and then the other monsters as well, had come back to stamp out humans, which was like a virus infecting the planet and destroying nature. And so the old monsters had come back to protect the planet.

Now it’s very interesting that all of this stuff is sort of in the general culture, it’s all in the backs of people’s minds. And I would say, why don’t we just stop for a moment and ask ourselves what this is all for? Well, what is its purpose? What is the purpose of the global economy? And the conservatives, as you say, will say it’s for goods and services. But are they really that important to have? Are they more important than the actual quality of life?

Because it’s, again, it’s the early 20th century thinkers who are reactionaries and on the right — I think was Rene Gounon [sp] would talk about the quantification of the world, where everything became a quantity to be consumed and it overruled the actual quality of life.

And so the idea of sitting in a pod eating a maggot burger is where that all leads! Because if you’ve got the best iPhone and the flat-screen TV, you’re a success, you’ve made it, and it’s all worth it for that.

Henrik: Absolutely! I mean, look at the matrix, right? I mean, that’s really what awaits us if this continues, to work out those kinks that might follow. I mean, we do have a establishment that not only want to push us towards utilitarianism, because they want to incentivise essentially, having as many people around as possible, or something. Or for the sake of, let’s say demographically replace Westerners, or something like that, that’s why just cram em all in megacities and stuff like that!

But to deal with the potential fallout of some people being, if your biological entity might be unhappy, if you’re spending the majority of your life in a small pod. So the best way around that is just to jack you into a digital world, a virtual space, where you can run around! You can do whatever you want, you can be whoever you want, no restrictions, no limitations! It will be all clean and nice, if that’s what you want.

It could be a forever beach hut down in Bahamas, or something, right? And eventually we’ll be fed like a single-cell protein, or as you say, maggots, or something like that. I mean, that’s the future we’re looking at right now!

Morgs: Yeah. I mean, with the iPhone they’re already halfway there. Because it’s not as sophisticated as the matrix sort of jacking you in.

But I saw an interesting meme last week. Where it showed you all of these people on the London Underground, and one of the photos, they all had their iPhones and then they’ve done that again but they Photoshopped out the iPhones so they were just looking at their hands. And it was as if they were just staring, they were all atomized! Nobody was looking at anybody else, on one was talking to anybody else! And when you remove their phone they’re all just looking down into their hands. And it’s all just this emptiness internalized.

So they’re actually quite far with the Matrix scenario. It’s just it’s in the form of the iPhone that you walk around with, in which your eyes are glued to all the time, rather than having the plug going in the back of your head

Henrik: Yeah. And all this will be very subtle. The steps will be very gradual in a sense that it won’t be a dramatic shift towards that. I mean, I think they’ll probably go towards like augmented reality initially first. You know, projections onto things, or something that interfaces with your neural, with your visuals, you know, your eyes essentially. Where you see certain things, there’s like overlays on reality, rights and eventually you start, well remove the unpleasant things, or whatever you don’t want to see, and it becomes a very selective little experience. It’s all ultimately let’s [30:01] face it, it’s escape from reality, because we all know that right now reality sucks! And no one likes where this is going. Everyone sees that quality is going down the drain. Yeah go ahead

Morgs: It’s also interesting that what we’re talking about now which is solely the commodification of humanity, this is the kind of criticism Extinction Rebellion could be leveling at the elites, and at the system.

Henrik: Yes

Morgs: Well they’re not. They’re doing the opposite! They’re demanding that the system has more power, and more control, to save the world from an abstract problem. Whereas we, let’s say nationalists, or people on the dissident right, should be looking at this is that we’re interested in how this is affecting the people, more than the climate. How is the system, how is this machine actually dealing with people? And it’s dealing with us like the maggots!

I did a video on that called “Deep Fried Human Nuggets”, where essentially they’re breeding a new kind of person.

And what you’ll end up with is where you’re just, because you can apply this to the way they have done it on chickens. There are mass chicken batteries, and the you get some chickens which are specially bred for the breast, and then others which are specially bred for the legs. And the one that’s bred for the breast can’t walk, because they’re not interested in the legs. And it just lies, it spends it’s life lying hooked up with a tube in its mouth which is feeding it. And it’s disgusting! You can see that optimal production would just be this ball of meat, with a mouth and an anus {laughing]. And think of like when humans are on [word unclear].

Henrik: Yeah! I mean, yeah. What is it all for, right? Well, what’s the purpose of this thing? What is the experiences that we do want? And right now there’s no — well there are some people that do have direction and they know what they’re doing, they want to try to mold and shape the world in their image. They’re getting us there. This is, all this stuff that’s happening right now is a “success story” as far as they’re concerned, so far.

But there, of course, are ruminations of discontent underneath the surface, that’s bubbling up. And that’s why they’re so heavily trying to block, and censor, and shut people’s ability down to communicate these dangerous ideas that are poking holes and in this new global utopia that they’re building for us.

Morgs: And I mean, especially when you tackle the machine in these ways it does bypass a lot of the alarm systems as well. Essentially, it’s arguing from the Left. This is the job that the Left have left open to people on the Right, to say:

“Well actually, we think living a genuine, quality, life is more important than having all of these consumer goods.”

There should be a left-wing, but they have left that out. They’re become obsessed with the power. And they have become sort of locked in the system and in the grid themselves. And so there’s a big opening for dissident, more traditional minded people on the right, nationalists, to say:

“Well, it’s not so much about hating other groups, it’s just that we want to have a genuine sense of being in community in our own country! And it’s gonna be outside of this sort of controlled grid of global capital and technology.”

Henrik: Yeah I absolutely, … This is a very obviously important and interesting philosophical discussion to have. And it’s the one that we need to have more often. And I do want to continue with this. There was just one thing I wanted to go back to before we lose kind of the Extinction Rebellion and some of the things that they’re promoting here. Because we’ve heard in recent years, it’s really the recent few months now, that this has picked up about how dangerous people who are pro-nationalism are. It’s a very intense pressure, if you will, from the mainstream media, and kind of the culture of overall.

But I heard something, one of the guys at the Extinction Rebellion was talking about, speaking about, violence and things like that. Let’s play this, and I’m gonna get your take on this, because we always hear, of course, that people who object this kind of stuff, are the dangerous violent ones. But listen to this here:

“We are going to force the governments to act! And if we don’t, if they don’t, we will bring them down and create a democracy fit for purpose! And yes! Some may die in the process. And yes! Some may die in the process.”

Imagine if a nationalist would have said that, Morgoth.

Morgs: Yeah, they’d be destroyed! [35:01] There’d be an armed police force and helicopters! You’d be gone, you’d be gone off the face of the earth in no time at all!

Henrik: Yeah!

Morgs: It’s fascinating, it’s unbelievable!

I mean, for much, much less than saying something like that. I did a video, just somebody who called out the local labor councilors on issues relating to child grooming and sex trafficking, in town in the North called Sunland. And he went to jail for 21 months, because he stood in the middle of the town and had a big rant against who was responsible! And the carted him off to jail for 21 months!

And here you have like a well-spoken man, and very middle-class, and quite polished, talking about yeah, people will die. It’s unbelievable!

Henrik: Yeah, we’re gonna hold you off from the halls of power, and yeah, some people will have to die. But it’s fine, you know, because we gotta break some eggs in this wonderful omelet we’re making here! But of course, as you say, this is being allowed. This is being permitted, because this group is in the hands of the (((globalists))).

They are being used as a tool by them, because it’s effective to try to get people to, I guess to give the appearance that it’s some kind of grassroots support for us handing over power and influence into fewer and fewer hands.

Well, is there something else that you’ve been looking at, when it comes to like the Extinction Rebellion, of how they’re being used, or something like that, that’s worth to squeeze in here, in the first segment, before we take a break in a few minutes?

Morgs: Just one thing I would touch on, is that by and large, as this sort of controlled opposition psychological operation, it’s been a bit of a failure. It has become a bit of a joke. But we’ve reached a stage, I mean we’re probably going to go into Brexit, where the elite don’t really care whether you believe it, or not. Because you’ve got no choice in the matter. So you can tweet, and you can make videos laughing at Extinction Rebellion, but they don’t care! They’re just gonna run with the narrative anyway, because there’s nothing you can do about it.

I mean, in the past it used to be much more sophisticated. Occupy Wall Street and these kinds of groups, that you can actually debate. I think that was actually legit, but got co-opted. But whatever the case may be, the people seem to take them more seriously. Whereas we’ve reached a stage now where the elite say:

“Yeah, okay, it looks ridiculous but, you know, we don’t care, because there’s nothing you can do about it!”

Henrik: Yeah and it needs to be pointed out too, for maybe newcomers, newly red-pilled people — whatever you want to call it — but people are starting to question the lies and the garbage that is being shoved down our throats, that much of this, which the Extinction Rebellion bases their hysteria around, has been debunked.

I mean, Climategate back in 2010. All this was centered around Britain at the time. East Anglia University was it, the Climate Research Unit, the CRU. A lot of the numbers that the IPCC gathered actually came from CRU. And this 1.5 degrees which is the latest report that the IPCC released, is the whole basis of this:

“Oh my god we only have 12 years!”

Because if it’s an increase by 1.5 percent, it’s all gonna, you know, we’re all gonna die, we’re all gonna die in some major heat wave, or whatever, you know, some horrible fire! But much of the individual measurements that at CRU did was released in these leaked emails, that they had been placed in very shady places, like parking lots, had been placed in things about which were artificially warmed by human construction, denser areas. They have been fiddling with the numbers and stuff.

I mean, this is 2010, I can’t remember all the details from it. But Tim Ball, a lot of other people that covered this extensively back then. And it should have been an issue which was like laid to rest. And it felt at the time, Morgoth, that some of these things did die. That Al Gore was at the forefront at that time, and a lot of him and his work, kind of felt like he was discredited. But now it’s brought back again, because people don’t have that long-term memory. They can’t even remember this, right?

Morgs: Yeah. I mean, according Al Gore, New York should be under war are now! Also, he’s just bought up a beachfront property in San Francisco last year, or something. A really sort of slick mansion on the beach! [laughter] And he, of all people, knows that well we should be underwater, but it didn’t happen.

But it is, yeah, it is something that they roll out. This time it’s kind of like Extinction Rebellion is for the age of social justice, rather than sort of tackling [40:01] the more thoughtful, sits there and considers the facts and the science. That didn’t work, so in the age of the social justice warrior, we will retell the same narrative and do it again for people, these emotionally distraught Millennials. And you can see that exactly what they’ve done.

Henrik: Yeah. There’s so many things on a psychological level which are clever and weaved into this, because people do need a purpose, they need to feel good about something that they’re doing, and stuff. And so these groups, and these kinds of stunts, or whatever you want to call it, pop up on a regular basis really, to kind of allow people to flood, and put their discontent into that, their attention, their focus.

And again, yes there is a very real and important aspect of environmentalism weaved into that, but as you said, before, eloquently it’s a deflection, actually, away from the real kind of issues. And what’s happening with all the chemicals, and even human medication being dumped in the water supply. And, you know, things that are altering us, that are leading to other weird weird side effects. None of that is being discussed. It’s essentially just pay more money and hand over power, that’s all that it is now, at this point!

Morgs: The male suicide epidemic across the West, is another symptom of the modern world. And whether, or not this is all to do, it’s not to do with the climate, but it is to do with the way we actually live in the modern world, which is depressing a lot of men. And, of course, this doesn’t come in at the equation at all. In fact, you ended up living in a pod and eating a maggot burger, and watch virtual reality porn on your flat-screen TV, and that’s your lot, is not going to help with that whatsoever.

But in actual real problems which people are faced with, they don’t help at all. It’s to further empower the elite to restrict how people live, and actually get us into the pods.

Henrik: Yes. And you pointed out in that article too. So a couple of interesting facts, if we can squeeze in here before we take a short break. But they were arguing for people to stop flying, don’t travel, stop eating meat, or beef specifically, I think it was as well. Was there anything else they added on to that list of what we plebs need to do?

Morgs: What she said was that they will make it so that driving, and flying, and eating beef, will be made socially taboo in the same way that smoking was.

Henrik: That is right.

Morgs: So that this indirect pressure, and, of course, in the end smoking just became completely banned everywhere! And eventually with vaping it was kind of replaced entirely. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing. I used to smoke and I didn’t do it anymore.

But the point is you can, they can socially engineer things at that macro level, to change people’s behaviors and away from say eating beef. I mean, a couple of people pointed out that eating beef actually is genuinely terrible for the environment.

And yeah, so it gets back to that point. Again, is it natural that four billion people on earth have access to steaks, because all of our cattle has to be reared in, let’s say the Amazon or wherever. There’s definitely real deep discussions to be had on this subject. Should should beef be a luxury item? There’s a good case to be made for sayin yeah, it should. But then we can substitute it with like fish, or something like that. But this is not really what Extinction Rebellion are arguing for, at all.

Henrik: No, it’s you shut up, and you eat the maggots now! You get the bugs! And, you know, we at the top will do everything as usual, in fact, we get more luxury. We get more control, more money, more resources, and everything else!

No, it’s a total fraud! A total sham! If they were sincere about this they wouldn’t weave in migration into this, as a kind of, you know, I’ve seen the links, climate migration, we have to accept immigrants now, because of, you know, there’s climate change in other areas. And therefore bringing people millions of people each year into kind of a Western world lifestyle is somehow going to aid to this process?

I think it’s, at the end of the day, it’s, … I think one of (((their))) primary goals is demographic replacement! And that’s part of their control agenda, right? Destroy those pesky Europeans that might do some weird kind of unexpected things when it comes to protesting against their subversion, I guess their submission, right.

And so they might kind of, there’s a couple examples, let’s put it that way, historically, that have given them pause. And (((they))) think:

“Well, yeah, if we can destroy national homogeneity, if we can destroy the ethnic makeup, the glue that makes up these various nations, globalism is going to be so much easier!”

Another plus side is that can replace Europeans specifically! Kind of get they them out of the picture. And I think that’s related to what you mentioned before, that appreciation for freedom, liberty, and that kind of thing, is among the highest I think among Europeans overall.

So we’re a we’re an obstacle in the way towards globalism

Morgs: I would also just point out as well, that what we see emerging from “social justice” which is “Whiteness studies”, which is where Europeans are sort of, they will call the whole system “Whiteness”, and say “Whiteness” is something that has to be abolished. That ties in very nicely with this new climate agenda, because it’s the same system that they’re talking about.

Henrik: A few of those kinds of headlines which I was thinking about, like climate refugees, population displacement, building a trade union, civil society, Guardian again. Orwellian anti-refugee system hints at what’s to come for climate refugees. Everyone has the right to move safely and legally.

CNN: Climate change to create hundred and forty three million migrants. World Bank says:

“You’re ready for tens of millions of climate refugees.”

Right? So we’ve seen these kinds of headlines being pushed in the mainstream for some time time now, but no one questions bringing millions of people into Western lifestyle would be the worst thing for the environment, in fact.

Morgs: Yeah, exactly. Yeah. And it’s all one humanity, one mass, one big blob, and it will need one government to control it!

Henrik: That’s right! Oversee everything and it’s, I mean, it’s problem, reaction, solution, right? You create problems, you offer, you get outrage, and then you offer the solution. Which is again:

“We’ll take care of you! Just hand over more control to us, and we’ll make sure it’s right!”

It’s all very clever! It’s all in the books. But let’s take a break here Morgoth, and then we’ll dive into much more here in part two. But plug some of your stuff then. Let us know where people need to go, follow your blog, subscribe to your YouTube, Twitter, etc.

Morgs: Morgoth’s Review on all of me platforms, on YouTube, BitChute, which is becoming more of an important site.

Henrik: That is right. I do have to remember mentioning that, thank you for bringing that up, by the way.

Morgs: BitChute and Morgoth’s Review on blogspot as well is easy to find as well.

Henrik: Now does a search work on BitChute? Let’s see. I just know that sometimes it’s not the best on there

Morgs: If you type it in from Google, or your search browser.

Henrik: Yeah, I did find it there. Yeah, Morgoth’s Review. Yeah, doing good on subs over there too, so that’s great.

Morgs: I also do the occasional video. All of my live streams are probably gonna go on to BitChute. And then, from time to time, I do a sort of monologue, which is a bit too hot for YouTube. That one in the corner there called “Cracks in the Goldberg” is an example of a too hot for YouTube video. Which I’ll do, just for BitChute to help BitChute along. And you really see the difference as well. They’re popular when they just go on exclusively on BitChute.

Henrik: Yes, it’s true. No, that’s great! I think I watched that one, that’s about a month old. I recognized the thumbnail. I thought that that was really good, as well. And I forget, I think it was a BitChute right away that I saw it. But yeah, some good stuff over there. So make sure you subscribe to Morgoth’s Review on be BitChute as well.

But guys we’ll take a short break here. We’ll be back in part two. More with Morgoth’s Review coming up. Stay tuned and see you on the other side.

Alright ladies and gentlemen, we’re gonna continue in part two with Morgoth’s Review. Definitely make sure that you tune in. We’re going to continue to talk about Brexit, demographic situation, and new census that’s coming out in the UK next year. That’s gonna be very revealing in terms of the demographic transformation of the UK.

We’re gonna talk about the increase in knife crime, acid attacks. Of course, the kind of unholy alliance between the Left and Islam in the UK, is kind of beginning to tear a little bit at the seams. We will dive into detail about that and kind of discuss in a bit. What it will take to get people of English descent to realise what the establishment is doing to them, and what they actually what kind of future they’re going to create for their kids and their grandchildren.

Anyway a lot to get into. Definitely make sure you don’t miss it. Head on over to Red Ice Members com. Sign up for a membership with us, it’s the best way to support us and, of course, you get access to hundreds and hundreds of hours of good content. Interviews, weekend warrior, exclusive videos, bunch of stuff is in the members section for you, as well.

It’s only about the price of an expensive fancy cup of coffee per month. We have subscriptions from 3 months, all the way up to to years. And, of course, the longer sub you get, the cheaper that is per month as well. But check it out, Red Ice Members dot com! Great way of supporting us. We’ll see you guys after the break. Tons more coming up, so stay tuned, Red Ice dot TV, and Red Ice members dot com. See you after the break!

[51:04]

END

============================================

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages =

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2: Oct 13, 2019 — Added images.

Version 1: Oct 12, 2019 — Published post.

Posted in Britain, Communism, Extinction Rebellion, Freedom of Speech, Globalism, Henrik Palmgren, Hollywood, Jew World Order, Jewish Problem/Question, Jewish Supremacism, Media - BBC, Morgoths Review, Multiculturalism, Red Ice Radio, Red Ice Radio - Henrik, Thought Crime, Uncategorized, Western Civilization | 5 Comments

Patrick Grimm – Do You Get It Yet? – Mar 18, 2007

Posted on October 8, 2019 by admin

Patrick Grimm talks of how Whites’ obliviousness to how Orgjew has been systematically destroying our countries will not end well. The sheer sadism that jews are inflicting upon people in the Middle East, against the Palestinians, is a taste of what they will inflict upon us if we allow them to take total control over our societies. The solution to this immense problem that confronts us is to speak up, tell people your concerns — KATANA.

_______________________

Patrick Grimm

Do You Get It Yet?

Mar 18, 2007

HERE is an article chronicling a criminal Jewish organization, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, this time its New England chapter, openly and unabashedly working to assist more illegal immigrants who are breaking into America. You still don’t get it yet? You still don’t see that the balkanization, the fragmentation and the dissolution of your nation is being orchestrated by one group and one group alone? It is the Jews, mostly Zionist Jews, who are sticking it to us.

Do you not yet understand that the Jews work better in a society that is not monocultural, but instead a stew of warring ethnicities more ripe for Hebrew control? Are you not yet capable of seeing the double standard and blatant hypocrisy of the international Zionist disease that is gripping America and indeed the entire Western world? I’m not mincing words here and I’m not going to disguise my ideas in pseudonyms about “liberals” and “secularists” when it is one group and only one group who is united in their desire to destroy us. Wake up! Wake up before it’s too late for all of us. Call me an alarmist if you want to. Call me an extremist, but as Barry Goldwater reminded us “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.” He also told us that “Moderation in the defense of liberty is no virtue.” I won’t be a fence-sitter as American slides into the Jewish sewer right down that slippery slope that organized Jewry has planned for us.

Continue reading →

Posted in America, Anti-Defamation League, Arabs, Jews, Jews - Hostile Elite, Patrick Grimm | 5 Comments

Adam Green – David Icke Explains The Trigger & Endgame – Sep 16, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Posted on September 20, 2019 by admin

[Adam Green who has the YouTube channel “Know More News” interviews well-known “conspiracy” author David Icke about his latest book “The Trigger”.

In short, the 9/11 attack was a false flag carried out by Orgjew as part of its long-running plan to create a One World Tyranny over humanity.

Icke’s take on Trump is spot on (around the 25:00 mark);

“And for me Donald Trump was brought in for a number of reasons, here’s two of them. One he is owned by this cult! I’m not saying he’s an insider of it, I’m saying he’s owned by it, which is basically operated out of Israel.”

— KATANA]

Adam Green with David Icke

Explains “The Trigger” & Endgame

Sep 16, 2019

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV8XA_TBu0s

Published on Sep 16, 2019

YouTube Description

#KnowMoreNews #Renegade
David Icke Explains the Trigger & Endgame
8,486 views
•Premiered 2 hours ago
1.1K
67
Share
Save
Know More News
110K subscribers
David Icke Links:
https://www.davidicke.com/
https://www.youtube.com/user/davidicke
https://www.facebook.com/davidicke/
https://twitter.com/davidicke

Know More News with Adam Green
https://www.KnowMoreNews.org/

Support Know More News!
Paypal Donations – https://www.paypal.me/KnowMoreNews
Patreon – https://www.patreon.com/AdamGreen
Subscribe Star – https://www.subscribestar.com/know-mo…
Venmo – @Know-More-News
Bitcoin BTC
37zFrYXmKMzxSxK1sp25DszW7rGE8uHmLy
Bitcoin BCH
qz4jj0cwjuvczt4wfpxx006at5uj33skdc6vkk4j9z

Follow KMN on Social Media:
TWITTER https://twitter.com/Know_More_News
FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/KnowMoreNews
INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/know_more_n…
GAB https://gab.com/Know_More_News
DLIVE https://dlive.tv/Know_More_News
BITCHUTE https://www.bitchute.com/channel/know…
KNOW MORE NEWS 2
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz3Q…

TRANSCRIPT

(91:53 mins)

[00:00]

Green: Welcome ladies and gentlemen. Adam Green here with Know More News.org. It’s September 16, 2019. And today joining me a very special guest known as the “Renegade” the “Dot Connector”, undoubtedly one of the biggest names and legends in alternative media, Mr David Icke himself! Welcome David! Thanks for coming on.

Icke: Thanks Adam, real pleasure. You do some great work!

Green: Thank you so much. That’s a huge honor to hear that coming from you. I am so happy to have you on! This is one of the first interviews that you’re doing for your brand new excellent book, “The Trigger — the Lie that Changed the World, Who Really Did It and Why”. I just finished a few days ago, despite having an advance copy. It’s a huge book, and I say one of the most important books ever written! I hope everybody runs out and gets it and shares the information with everyone they know.

Why don’t you start by telling us a little bit about why you wrote the book, and what people can expect to get out of it.

Icke: Well, I remember on September the 11th, 2001 being out walking in England. And someone told me what had happened. And immediately, obviously, I was away to see the news, to look at the detail. And immediately it struck me that there was something big-time not right about this.

And by then I’d understood the major technique that is used to manipulate people to accept vast changes in society that they wouldn’t otherwise accept. And I gave it the name a long time ago now:

“Problem, Reaction, Solution”

Create the “Problem” — get someone else to be blamed for it not you. Get the mainstream media — no problem — to tell the public version of the event the problem that you want people to believe.

And you want at stage two the “Reaction” from the public of do something! This can’t go on! Something must be done you want the public in fear and outrage, so that they will be open to a solution.

And the “Solution” to your manufactured problem which you blame someone else for, is then to change society in ways that you would never have got away with without the manufactured problem. Problem, reaction, solution!

It’s played on us constantly all the time. Another name for it in the alternative media is, of course, “false flag”. So I had a massive question mark from day one and from that day I started researching and investigating the background. And it led to a book I published in September 2002 called “Alice in Wonderland in the World Trade Center Disaster — Why the Official Story of 9/11 is a Monumental Lie”. And obviously since then I’ve kept my eye on developments as the years have passed and I set out about just over a year ago to write an update to Alice in Wonderland, to bring it kind of up-to-date and within two weeks I thought:

“No no! We starting with a blank sheet of paper here!”

Because of the way that information was flowing and where it was taking me. And so I produced this book which is basically two books both of them fundamentally connected. The first half of the book demolishes the official story of 9/11. Which is you well know is not the hardest thing ever to do but most people don’t hear the information they only hear the mainstream version of it. So over the first half of the book with a hell of a lot I mean, masses of factual detail. The 9/11 official story is taken apart.

And in the second half of the book I tell her an amazing story which eventually leads to who actually was behind it. And it wasn’t nineteen Islamic extremists hijackers it was some a network that not only was responsible for 9/11, but right up to present day is responsible for what’s happening in the world, or what’s happened since 9/11 like the wars in the Middle East that have been justified by the trigger of 9/11. [05:01] that’s the reason for the name of the book, because 9/11 was a “trigger” that started a sequence of events that’s still going on.

This same network is responsible for 5G and the emerging smart grid, to eventually connect the human mind the human brain to artificial intelligence. So artificial intelligence becomes the human mind. So you can see, well, you know, having read it, that the trigger is a book about 9/11. It has 9/11 as it’s theme, but it’s not only about 9/11. It’s about the whole massive connection from those that were behind the horrors of that day, the connection into current events, and events that have happened before and since.

Green: Yeah the first half of the book is, you know, kind of your normal 9/11 conspiracy stuff. It’s the second half that is really something special. It shows it covers a lot of Christopher Bollyn’s research into who was behind 9/11. And then more importantly I think you connect it to the whole “anti-semitism industry”, the Israeli tech dominance. The Sabbatean Frankist, 5G, the tech takeover of vaccines, the technocracy, the technological dictatorship that’s coming. Which you and I both agree they’re planning on running it from Jerusalem, from Beersheba. Your thoughts on some of that?

Continue reading →

Posted in 911 - World Trade Center, 911 Anniversary, America, Arabs, Bk - Solving 9-11, Blogroll - 911, Brainwashing, Christainity, Communism, Democrats, Donald Trump, Freemasons, George Soros, Globalism, Hate Speech, Holocaust, Holohoax, Iraq, ISIS, Israel, Jew World Order, Jewish Problem/Question, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Naming, Media - BBC, Media - jewish domination, Mossad, Multiculturalism, Muslim invasion, Palestine, Propaganda, Race, Rothschild, Saul Alinsky, Secret Elite, Thought Crime, Thought Police, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, Western Civilization, White genocide, WW II, Zionism | Leave a comment

Byram Campbell

The New Mythology

of Racial Equality

1963

Part 2 of 3

CONTENTS

[Part 1]

The New Mythology of Racial Equality.

A VISIT TO SPAIN The Spanish People AN APPRAISAL OF SPAIN

ITALY AND THE ITALIANS The Italian People

[Part 2]

AN OVERALL LOOK AT AFRICA Egypt UPPER EGYPT VISITED The Egyptian People Khartoum AN APPRAISAL OF THE AFRICAN

A RELIGIOUS PEOPLE AND A HOLY CITY Benaras INDIA’S CAPITAL AND THE TAJ MAHAL Delhi Agra AN ESTIMATE OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE The Monuments of India India as a Civilization

[Part 3]

SOUTHEASTERN ASIANS Bangkok

HONG KONG

THE BRITISH AND THE FAR EAST

CONCERNING THE JAPANESE

HAWAII AND THE HAWAIIANS

SOME OVERALL CONCLUSIONS

Other Works by the Same Author

The New Mythology of Racial Equality

Byram Campbell

The New Mythology

of Racial Equality

1963

Part 1 of 3

CONTENTS

[Part 1]

The New Mythology of Racial Equality.

A VISIT TO SPAIN The Spanish People AN APPRAISAL OF SPAIN

ITALY AND THE ITALIANS The Italian People

[Part 2]

AN OVERALL LOOK AT AFRICA Egypt UPPER EGYPT VISITED The Egyptian People Khartoum AN APPRAISAL OF THE AFRICAN

A RELIGIOUS PEOPLE AND A HOLY CITY Benaras INDIA’S CAPITAL AND THE TAJ MAHAL Delhi Agra AN ESTIMATE OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE The Monuments of India India as a Civilization

[Part 3]

SOUTHEASTERN ASIANS Bangkok

HONG KONG

THE BRITISH AND THE FAR EAST

CONCERNING THE JAPANESE

HAWAII AND THE HAWAIIANS

SOME OVERALL CONCLUSIONS

Other Works by the Same Author

The New Mythology of Racial Equality

Morgoth’s Review

My General Election

Dilemma

Nov 26, 2019

YouTube Description

TRANSCRIPT

END

See Also

PDF Notes

Version History

Morgoth’s Review

What if Classic Liberalism

is the Problem?

Oct 29, 2019

YouTube Description

TRANSCRIPT

We Were Never Asked!

Laura Towler

Oct 24, 2019

YouTube Description

YouTube Stats

CONTENTS

TRANSCRIPT

Part One — The Current Situation

Scandza Forum

Copenhagen 2019

Millennial Woes

YouTube Description

TRANSCRIPT

END

See Also:

PDF Notes

Version History

Scandza Forum

Copenhagen 2019

Mark Collett

A VISIT TO SPAIN
The Spanish People
AN APPRAISAL OF SPAIN

ITALY AND THE ITALIANS
The Italian People

AN OVERALL LOOK AT AFRICA
Egypt
UPPER EGYPT VISITED
The Egyptian People
Khartoum
AN APPRAISAL OF THE AFRICAN

A RELIGIOUS PEOPLE AND A HOLY CITY
Benaras
INDIA’S CAPITAL AND THE TAJ MAHAL
Delhi
Agra
AN ESTIMATE OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE
The Monuments of India
India as a Civilization

SOUTHEASTERN ASIANS
Bangkok

A VISIT TO SPAIN
The Spanish People
AN APPRAISAL OF SPAIN

ITALY AND THE ITALIANS
The Italian People

AN OVERALL LOOK AT AFRICA
Egypt
UPPER EGYPT VISITED
The Egyptian People
Khartoum
AN APPRAISAL OF THE AFRICAN

A RELIGIOUS PEOPLE AND A HOLY CITY
Benaras
INDIA’S CAPITAL AND THE TAJ MAHAL
Delhi
Agra
AN ESTIMATE OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE
The Monuments of India
India as a Civilization

SOUTHEASTERN ASIANS
Bangkok