[Here is an English translation of “The Nuremberg Laws” chart of 1935. I believe the Nuremberg Laws  will prove to be a very useful model in the future in deciding who can live in White countries and under what conditions. The laws would apply not only to jews but also other non-Whites —  KATANA.]

 

 

The Nuremberg Laws

 

Chart in English

 

 

 

 Here’s an extract from the post:  Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 12 – The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together …  on The Nuremberg Laws. 

The Nuremberg Laws — 1935

 

Meanwhile, Hitler proceeded with his program to reduce the influence and control of Jews in Germany and to marginalize them as a race. The Nuremberg Laws, which changed the legal status of Jews in Germany, became the law of the land on September 15, 1935 soon after they were presented to the German people in a speech by Hitler at the annual Nazi Nuremberg Rally.

 

[Add. Image (click to enlarge) — Chart with the title, “Die Nurnberger Gesetze” (Nuremberg Race Laws). Complex chart used to aid Germans in understanding the Nuremberg Race Laws. White circles represent Aryan Germans, black circles represent Jews, and partially shaded circles represent “mixed raced” individuals.]

 

The Nuremberg Laws consisted of two laws;

(1) “The Law of the Reich Citizen,” and

(2) “The Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor.”

 

The first law stripped Jews of their German citizenship and made them “subjects of the Reich,” that is, legal residents in Germany, but not citizens. Only those with German blood could be citizens of the Reich.

 

 

The second law forbade marriage or sexual relations between Jews and those of German blood, or even the employment of German women (under age 45) in Jewish households. [1] The stated purpose of the law was to protect the purity of German blood, which was deemed necessary to preserve the German race.

 

[Add. Image — A Hitler Youth instructor explains the Nuremberg racial purity laws to a class of teenage boys.]

 

Jews were no longer allowed to vote or to hold public office since they were no longer citizens. Their movements and activities inside Germany were restricted, and a large red “J” was stamped on their passports. The Nuremberg laws caused Jews to want to leave Germany for friendlier shores, which is precisely what Germany wanted them to do. It should be pointed out, however, that the Jews were never actually forced to leave Germany until well after World War II began, and a great many Jews remained in Germany, unmolested, throughout the war.

 

 

[Add. Image (click to enlarge) —  “The Nuremberg Laws”, in English.]

 

These laws had the unexpected result of generating a lot of confusion and heated debate among Nazi bureaucrats as to how a Jew should be defined because there were a great many people with mixed blood. The Nazis settled on defining a “full Jew” as a person with three Jewish grandparents. A “mixed Jew” or “Mischlinge” was defined in two degrees.

 

The first degree Mischlinge had two Jewish grandparents, while the second degree Mischlinge had only one grandparent. Mischlinges who practiced Judaism were considered full Jews. Full Jews were subject to the full extent of the law, while Mischlinges were subjected to the law in lesser degrees, depending on their degree of Jewishness. Mischling civil servants as well those in some other jobs were allowed to stay on.

 

 

---

 

 

The following is from:

 

THE SIX MILLION: FACT OR FICTION?

 

 

Peter Winter

 

SEVENTH EDITION

Revised, Updated and Expanded January 2018 Revisionist Books

 

https://thesixmillionfactorfiction.blogspot.com

 

 

Section 1: Nazi Anti-Semitism and Jewish Emigration from Greater Germany 1933-1940

 

The first thing that any rational person notices about media coverage of the Third Reich, Hitler, or the “Six Million” story, is that although there is always plenty of coverage of Nazi Anti-Semitism, there is hardly any attempt to explain why Hitler was able to come to power on such a strongly anti-Jewish political platform.

 

If this topic is addressed at all, it is quite often claimed that the Nazis were “jealous” of Jewish money, intellect or achievements, or any variation on that topic. The reality is, like the entire Six Million narrative, very different to the postwar propaganda.

 

The real reasons for Nazi anti-Semitism were far deeper:

 

— Jews were identified as a racially-alien group engaged in political, social and moral subversion. Politically, the Nazis pointed to the undisputed facts that the founder of Communism, Karl Marx, had been a Jew;

— that a majority of the Communist leaders who had seized power in the “Russian Revolution” of 1917 had been Jews (such as Leon Trotsky, real name Bronstein);

— that the majority of post First World War Communist leaders in Germany had been Jews (Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht);

— that much of the mass media in Germany was owned by Jews;

— that Jews were largely responsible for “modern art,”;

—that those convicted of war-profiteering and financial swindles of the 1920s were Jews (the Sklarek Scandal, which also involved the Social Democratic Party, being the most famous case), etc.

 

— The Nazis also associated Jews with extremist capitalist exploitation, which was linked to a much older — and European-wide — objection to Jewish financial dealings. Objections to Jewish money lending practices were as old as the Jewish community in Europe, and were even specifically mentioned in the English Magna Carta. They were also the primary reason why Jews were expelled from every single European nation during the Middle Ages.

 

In summary then, the Nazis sought to expel Jews from all aspects of Germany political cultural and social life, and it was to this end that their anti-Semitic policies were aimed.

 

To this end, by order of Reich Marshal Hermann Goring, a “Reich Central Office for Jewish Emigration” was set up, whose official tasks were listed as follows:

 

“a) to make all necessary arrangements for the preparation for an increased emigration of the Jews,

 

b) to direct the flow of emigration,

 

c) to speed the procedure of emigration in each individual case.”

(Wannsee Protocol, January 20,1942.)

 

Below: Contrary to postwar propaganda, the Nazi government actively encouraged Jewish emigration. This illustration, from the Encyclopedia Judaica (1971), Vol. 7, col. 494, shows Jews waiting at the Palestine Office, Berlin, for permits to enter Palestine (“Eretz Israel”) in 1939.

 

Figure 21. Waiting at the Palestine Office, Berlin, for permits to enter Eretz Israel, 1939.

Courtesy Yad Vashem, Jerusalem.

 

According to official figures, there were approximately 523,000 Jews in Germany as of January 1933, prior to the Nazis coming to power. At the time of the annexation of Austria in 1938, there were approximately 181,882 Jews in that country.

 

The Nazi efforts to encourage Jews to leave this combined “Greater Germany” were largely successful. By September 1939, approximately 282,000 Jews had left Germany and 117,000 had left Austria. Of these, some 95,000 emigrated to the United States, 60,000 to Palestine, 40,000 to Great Britain, and about 75,000 to Central and South America, with the largest numbers entering Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Bolivia. More than 18,000 Jews went to Shanghai, in Japanese-occupied China, creating a long-lasting Jewish settlement there.

 

By 1940, official figures showed that 131,800 Jews remained in Germany, and 43,700 in Austria — a total of 175,500. (Wannsee Protocol, January 20, 1942.) This was a significant decline from the pre-war total of 704,882.

 

Section 2: Zionist and Nazi Collaboration on the 1935 Nuremberg Laws

 

It is one of the great ironies of history that the Zionists and National Socialist government policy with regard to Jews coincided to a very large degree. In fact, National Socialist and Zionist policy coincided prior to the war, and cooperation carried on at least until 1943, as will be shown below.

 

The reason for the Zionist-Nazi cooperation was simple:

 

The Nazis wanted the Jews to leave Germany, and the Zionists wanted the Jews to come to Palestine to help create the Zionist state.

 

Below: The Jiidische Rundschau, Sept. 17,1935, the official Zionist newspaper in Germany, which welcomed and supported the Nuremberg Laws. This support for the legal definition of who is a Jew — as created by Nazis and Jews working together — is still referenced to the present-day in Israel’s “Law of Return” which regulates Jewish immigration into that state.

 

 

The 1935 Nuremberg Laws, for example, which are now dismissed as “Nazi anti-Semitic laws,” were in fact drawn up with the active assistance and support of the German Council of Jews.

 

What makes this fact even more astounding is that the definition of who is a Jew, as created by Israel’s Law of Return, as amended in 1970, is based on the definition as contained in the Nuremberg Laws (Jewish Virtual Library, The Law of Return: An Introduction, 2014, The American-Israeli Enterprise).

 

Thus it is no surprise that soon after the Nazis came to power, the Zionist Federation of Germany submitted a document to Hitler’s office which offered its support in “solving the Jewish question” (Memo of June 21, 1933, as reproduced in The Third Reich and the Palestine Question, Francis R. Nicosia, Austin: University of Texas, 1985, p. 42). The document continued:

 

“Zionism believes that the rebirth of the national life of a people, which is now occurring in Germany through the emphasis on its Christian and national character, must also come about in the Jewish national group. Our acknowledgment of Jewish nationality provides for a clear and sincere relationship to the German people and its national and racial realities. Precisely because we do not wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we, too, are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the Jewish group and reject any trespasses in the cultural domain, we — having been brought up in the German language and German culture — can show an interest in the works and values of German culture with admiration and internal sympathy” (ibid.).

 

When the Nuremberg Laws were first adopted by the Nazi Party at its congress of 1935, they were specifically welcomed by the Zionist-supporting Jewish German newspaper, the Jiidische Rundschau, which published an editorial which read:

 

“Germany… is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it declares the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the Jews have been stamped a national minority it is again possible to establish normal relations between the German nation and Jewry.

 

“The new laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own cultural life, its own national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its own theater, and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own future in all aspects of national life.

 

“Germany has given the Jewish minority the opportunity to live for itself, and is offering state protection for this separate life of the Jewish minority: Jewry’s process of growth into a nation will thereby be encouraged and a contribution will be made to the establishment of more tolerable relations between the two nations” (Jiidische Rundschau, Sept. 17,1935).

 

The head of the Zionist State Organization, the Jewish Cultural League, and former head of the Berlin Jewish Community, Georg Kareski, declared in an interview with the Nazi newspaper Der Angriff that:

 

“For many years I have regarded a complete separation of the cultural affairs of the two peoples [Jews and Germans] as a pre-condition for living together without conflict … I have long supported such a separation, provided it is founded on respect for the alien nationality. The Nuremberg Laws … seem to me, apart from their legal provisions, to conform entirely with this desire for a separate life based on mutual respect. . . This interruption of the process of dissolution in many Jewish communities, which had been promoted through mixed marriages, is therefore, from a Jewish point of view, entirely welcome” (Der Angriff, Dec. 23,1935).

 

 

 

_______________________

 

 

Notes

 

[1]  Here is an except from:

THE RIDDLE OF THE JEW’S SUCCESS : XVI – The Influence of the Jew Upon Womankind

 

It describes how, in jewish businesses and households that employed young German women, the jewish males very often preyed upon those female for sex.

 

“[Page 256]

 

The thousands of girls who, year in and year out, come to their ruin in Jewish business-houses and in Jewish families, could provide terrible evidence that the honest admission, quoted above, is founded upon fact. Certainly the objection is justified, that employers and people in positions of authority, who are not Jews, frequently abuse their position in the same shameful manner; but in all cases of this nature a characteristic difference always distinguishes those cases, where the culprit is a Jew, from those where he is not. And this difference lies in the attitude, which Jewish women take up towards such conduct on the part of their men-folk.

 

When confronted with the complaint of a servant-girl, that the “master” or “young master”, is annoying her with his attentions, a German married-woman will, in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred, prepare a very bad time indeed for the men of her household, and will replace the girl by one less dangerous. It is far otherwise with the Jewish wife or mother. She not only shows herself “tolerant” to her growing-up son, but overlooks as well the weaknesses of her husband, and actually assists him to attain his object — thus following the example of Sarah — by advising the girl, in her own interests, to yield to the desire of her pursuer.

 

In one particular instance, the words were repeated to me, with which a rich married Jewish woman received and disposed of the complaint of her pretty housemaid, that the master of the house was persecuting her with his attentions. Smiling almost sympathetically, and with a goodwill, which had something motherly about it, the mistress of the house spoke to the girl:

 

“What a foolish child you are! You are young, and you are pretty; if you leave and go into another house, there will be men there also, and they will also pursue you with the same object. And if you again leave your place and go to another, it will be the same there as well. Men are like that; a pretty girl is never free from pursuit. And at last you will yield. — Be sensible, and remain here; my husband is rich and can pay you well!”*

 

———————————–

* It is well-known to the inhabitants in Berlin, that, in consideration of a special payment, many registry offices for servants dispatch all good-looking country-girls, who apply to them for situations, exclusively to Jewish households.

———————————–

 

[Page 257]

 

In the case mentioned above, the girl possessed character enough to at once take her departure, but how few others would be strong enough to resist such plausible argument and insidious temptation? They fall victims to the Jews, and preserve silence concerning their shame. Moreover, the Jew is astute enough to flatter the vanity of the girl by timely presents and liberal treatment, so that those who have fallen, after they have once lost the first sense of disgrace, find little difficulty in speaking in glowing terms of their Jewish employers.

 

This story may surprise some readers on account of the peculiar attitude assumed by the Jewish married-woman, but this fact is nothing new to anyone acquainted with the circumstances; and, quite apart from the Talmudic perception, to which attention has already been called above, this behaviour arises out of another and absolutely materialistic frame of mind.

 

The Jewess knows only too well, that her lascivious husband will not be satisfied with intercourse with only one woman. Accordingly he will seek opportunities away from home. This, however, is generally expensive, and carries, moreover, dangers in its train — not the least of which are those affecting health. The astute, saving Jewess reasons thus with herself: a healthy servant-girl, who is paid a few thalers more than the usual wages, and who receives an occasional present in addition, is the cheapest expedient for appeasing the lewdness of the husband: and, of course, danger of infection is greatly reduced.”

 

======================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (2.6 MB).

Nuremberg Race Laws Chart in English – POST – Ver 3

 

 

Click to download a PDF of the chart (1.5 MB).

 

Nuremberg Race Laws Chart in English CHART – Ver 2

 

 

---

 

Version History

 

Version 5: Feb 4, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDFs for katana17.com/wp/ version.

 

Version 4: Feb 16, 2018 — Added excerpt from The Six Million: Fact or Fiction? on Zionist jews welcoming the Nuremberg Laws. Updated cover. Improved formatting, fixed typos. Updated PDF (Ver 3) of POST for download.

 

Version 3: Nov 6, 2017 — Added excerpt from The Riddle of the Jews Success on jews preying upon young German women employed by them. Added PDF (Ver 2) of POST for download.

 

Version 2:May 11, 2017 — Added cover image and Ver 2 of English chart. Fixed typos and improved formatting. Added PDF (Ver 2) of chart for download.

 

Version 1: Nov 19, 2016 — Created post.