David Clews with James Costello on
Sven Longshank’s Conviction
Wed, May 17, 2023
[In this video David Clews talks with James Costello about the unjust jailing of James Allchurch, aka, Sven Longshanks for 2 1/2 years by a bedwetting anti-White Welsh judge, Huw Rees, for making spicy podcasts several years ago that allegedly “stirred up racial hatred”, but yet resulted in no crime being committed or a single complaint being made!
Published on Wed, May 17, 2023
JAMESCOSTELLO JOINS THE EMPEROR DISCUSSING JAILING OF JAMES ALLCHURCH FOR WRONG SPEAK WITH NO VICTIM
275 11 0
First published at 05:06 UTC on May 17th, 2023.
#SHOWTRIAL #INJUSTICE #ALLCHURCH
UNN is now 5 YEARS OLD and we need your help to keep going for another 5 years!Over the last 5 years we have grown to be one of the biggest new media organisations in the UK, taking on the LIES of the MSM and big corporations, exposing them on Covid, Ukraine and so much more.
We haven’t just broadcasted news, we have been out on the streets and fought for freedom.
Now we need YOU to play your part!
YOU CAN HELP US IN 2 WAYS
Sign up to our free newsletter
Donate here now
You can find UNN
on our website
watch us on dlive
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Tweets by UnityNewsNet
Category News & Politics
Sensitivity Normal – Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over
TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 4.5 Stars
1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.
NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.
David Clews — A “White Supremacist” is Sentenced to 2 1/2 Years
David Clews: Let’s talk about this, because James will be on shortly:
“A White supremacist and self proclaimed Hitler supporter is jailed for two and a half years for stirring up racial hatred on his podcast station called Radio Aryan.”
Now, most normies will look at that and be revulsed. But what is a “White supremacist”?
Now, if you even talk about race as a White person, you’re a “White supremacist”! He’s a self proclaimed Hitler supporter. Okay, I understand that might be offensive, that might be upsetting for some people. But people can support Stalin. People can support Chairman Mao. People can support Che Guevara. People can support Pol Pot, if I hadn’t mentioned them. And they, in terms of mass murder, were on a higher level, if you believe the official narrative, than Hitler was.
So that’s allowed. There’s no issues with that.
Nobody Complained About This!
And then stirring up racial hatred:
“James Allchurch was found guilty of stirring up racial hatred.”
Just to confirm, again, nobody complained about this! Nobody went to the police!
And again, look at this as well. The wider picture here is it really isn’t about what James Allchurch said or did. The wider picture is about this is someone expressing their democratic right to free speech, debate, and dialogue, and the state simply doesn’t allow it! The state will clamp down and destroy you.
And look, if it can happen to James, it can happen to me, it can happen to you, it can happen to anybody. Because once a precedent like this is set, they use their power, they bare their teeth. Judge Rees said:
“During the playing of these podcasts, it was immediately apparent that the recordings were plainly insulting or abusive.”
There was No Racial Hatred Stirred up as a Result!
Well, again, insult or abuse is something that somebody takes:
“And that your sole intention was to stir up racial hatred.”
Listen to this as well. Just listen to the lies here. Listen to the lies here:
“Your sole intention was to stir up racial hatred, or at least racial hatred was likely to be stirred up as a result.”
There was no racial hatred stirred up as a result! Was there any riots because of what Sven Longshank said? No! I wouldn’t even hold them accountable if there was. Was there any killings as a result of what he said or did? No! Absolutely nothing!
Even then, whether individuals choose to act on their own volition, not what others tell them:
“The content of these podcasts were vile. Listening to them as the jury had to was a disturbing experience. It beggars belief, or it should be, that someone would want to speak these words at all, let alone feel the need to publish them for the consumption of others!”
This guy can think whatever he wants, like people think things.
He’s Deliberately Targeted Because of Who He’s Criticising
But again, look, this is not about free speeches. He’s deliberately targeted because of who he’s criticising and what he’s talking about, okay? And that’s it! That’s simply it! Because you see videos, you see tweets of black people, of Muslims, of jews, of other groups advocating genocide, advocating whole groups be destroyed, anti-White. And nothing ever happens about that, does it?:
“Your offending amounts, in my view, to a stain on our humanity, to our fellow human beings.”
Why is a judge speaking like this?
This is a Political Show Trial
What you have to understand is this is a political show trial. This is something that happens in North Korea, this is something that happens in China. That used to happen in any regime that would be considered totalitarian.
And as I always talk about, the problem in this country is people think that we live in a free country with a free press and an unbiased judiciary. No, we don’t!
And listen to what he says here:
“Your ideology based on race being pro-White and anti-non-White.”
And again, that’s subjective. Whether he was anti-non-White, ..:
“Has been expressed by you as having some form of basis for protection of our society. It is no such thing.”
Who is this judge to decide this? Said [by Sven]:
“At some points I had 4,000 listeners.”
Jailed for 2 1/2 Years When There is No Victim!
Now look, I get that some people might find this controversial. I get that some low IQ people, people who can’t listen to debate, who can’t listen to dialogue, might not like it. But just to remind you all, nobody complained! There was no victims of this crime. How can you go to jail for two and a half years when there is no victim?
Detective James Dunkerly of Counter Terror Police
Listen to this as well:
“Detective James Dunkerly of Counter Terror Police* said the podcast had threatened the safety of the public and the stability of our communities.”
There’s no evidence of that at all! They’re just making this up!:
“We will not accept any action which attempts to undermine or divide our communities and will continue to work to counteract the intentions of individuals who seek to do this.”
This is just off the charts stuff!
Reverend James Costello Attended Trial and Gives His View
And a man who was there with Sven and spoke with him and attended his trial was the Reverend James Costello. I’m going to bring him in on the show. James, how are you, sir?
James Costello: I’m fine. How are you?
David Clews: I’m disappointed with this, James. I have to be honest with you know, me, I take things to heart. And what I see here is very frightening and a very concerning precedent that’s been set.
The Law is Being Used Against People Who Have Pro-White Views
James Costello: Yeah, as you said, I did attend the trial and all I see is an arbitrary use of the law. It’s used against people who have pro-White views. But these same laws are not used against, let’s say, people who are vigilantly anti-White, who want to smash city centres to bits and destroy our heritage. They want to come after people who express moderately pro-White views and might say the occasional naughty word in the eyes of the current anti-White establishment.
David Clews: James, did he regard himself? I mean, nobody does, but they said he called for violence. Did he call for violence? I’ve never seen him indicates he called for violence.
Absolutely No Chance Sven Called for Violence
James Costello: Absolutely no chance. James Allchurch, as we call him, Sven Longshanks is a peace loving individual, there’s no doubt about it.
However, what they’re basing all that on is a song he played, because he’s a musician, James Allchurch. And he liked a particular song by some group that I don’t like, let’s just say that much. But they’re trying to portray him as a violent person just because he played a song! Can you imagine somebody playing Eminem or whatever, Slim Shady or whatever, and the violence showed in that nonsense or whatever, the rap culture, and then putting somebody in prison for that and portraying them as a violent individual? If you look at the double standard, that’s absolutely obscene!
David Clews: Yeah. It’s just off the charts. It really is. Again, I’ve pointed this out. Who is the victim of this? There is no victim! Everything the police said, everything we discussed, the judge said, nobody, nobody complained about it!
Not One Single Person Complained, Except Hope Not Hate
James Costello: Not one single person complained. There’s not one victim. Not one person who is, from what they call an ethnic minority, complained. The only people who made the complaint are, yet again, those people who are the great unwashed, HNH [Hope Not Hate], right? “No Hope of Soap”, as I like to call them.
Apparently, they put pressure on the local MP to target James Allchurch, and only then did they swoop down on him and raided his house, took all of his devices. And basically made it look like it was some big time Charlie gangster. But really, it’s just some fellow who makes podcasts. This is how absurd it is!
David Clews: Yeah. And what I find very interesting in these situations is people who claim to be for free speech, they won’t touch this. Like Toby Young himself, who founded the Free Speech Union. He said:
“It wasn’t in relation to this case, it was in relation to Tahara Ahmed. He says:
“Well, yeah, I mean, we wouldn’t get involved in that because it’s a police matter.”
That’s the whole point! The police make these matters out of nothing! I see how they work, how the media works, how they do it.
What’s Sven Like, as a Person?
What’s Sven like, as a person? James again from the MSM, you’re thinking he’s this, he’s rounding up, he’s beating migrants up and things like that, beating them with sticks. What’s he like as a person?
James Costello: Again, a peace loving individual who’s always looking to make friends with people. Let’s say we have a differing of opinion. He wants to make a compromise, he wants to be a friend. We have differences of opinion between him and myself, for example.
Yet I’ve never had bad arguments or anything like that with him. It’s always being cordial. And he’s very warm, invites you to stay at his home. You name it! This is like a really nice person that they tossed into the Gulag. This is what’s going on.
David Clews: Is he in prison tonight? James?
James Costello: I haven’t found out those details. To be honest with you, but I’ve just been given updates that he’s been sentenced to two and a half years in prison.
And I don’t know if you’ve touched upon this about his medical conditions?
Sven’s Myriad Medical Conditions
David Clews: Tell us a bit more about that, James. Because, again, let’s just caveat this. He doesn’t keep the best of health. Was it a bad accident he had a few years ago or was he assaulted a few years ago? What was that happened?
James Costello: I think he was assaulted, but he’s got so many ailments and he had so many prescription drugs, especially at the time of the so-called offence, that when you weigh that up, it’s very unjust to put somebody in prison for somebody who might not have been of his right mind at the time, even?
And then you’ve got to just consider the health conditions he has. Okay.
So I met up with him, and for the couple of weeks that he anticipated being in prison after the trial, he had a massive carrier bag full of medication. And it was so heavy, this heavy duty carrier bag, that the handles of the carrier bag ripped off because it was so heavy! This is a lad who’s on a lot of medications due to a myriad of ailments. [screen went out]
David Clews: James has disappeared there. He’ll come back. James, are you okay?
James Costello: Yeah. So even still, despite these myriad of ailments, it still hasn’t prevented the anti-White establishment basically, from tossing him into the Gulag, as I like to call it.
The Subjective Opinions of the Police and the Judiciary
David Clews: Yeah, there’s no two ways about this. That’s what this is, a political show trial. Not based on law, just based on the subjective, … And people need to understand how frightening this is based on the subjective opinions of the police and the judiciary, you can go to prison! If they just decide to put you in prison they’ll do it over opinions and words.
Keith Woods – the Same Judge Let Multiple Paedophiles Walk Free!
And in relation to the judge. And this is very, very important as well. Keith Woods tweeted this out:
“British podcaster jailed for two and a half years. The same judge let multiple paedophiles walk free. Judge tells skilled caretaker found with 600 child abuse images. He is taking a risk as he let’s him walk free. The same judge let an imam who raped a schoolgirl in a mosque. He gave him an absolute discharge due to his dementia.”
And this is the judge in question. This is Huw Rees:
“Huw Rees is a specialist criminal prosecutor. He also is a Welsh speaker and often defends and prosecutes in the Welsh language.”
Maybe what I say about Welshness, there’s a bit of truth in that.
But anyway, in case he is watching, or his goons at Hope Not Hate are watching. But it is frightening! It really, really is. And everyone should be outraged at this, but I don’t see any outrage, James, because people will be scared because [in a mocking tone]:
“Well, I mean, he’s a Nazi, and we can’t tell, ..!”
That’s what people do.
Only One Person on the Jury That Stood up for Freedom of Speech
James Costello: So many people, as you say, they claim to believe in freedom of speech.
But then when this is happening because this person had pro-White views, silence! Just so you know, there was only one person on the jury that stood up for freedom of speech and said:
“This whole thing should be just tossed out. It shouldn’t even be in court!”
David Clews: Is that right? Did one jury member say that?
James Costello: The juror actually said that. So it basically boiled down to an interpretation of the law.
So this one person interpreted the law the correct way, in my opinion, to say “no crime has been committed.” So out of twelve it was eleven to one.
But then the judge decided that that was enough. This majority verdict was enough to throw him into the Gulag. And he gave a big platitude at the end. I think most people are aware of the platitude he gave at the end.
David Clews: Yeah.
James Costello: “Stain on humanity”, and so forth.
Judge Rees’ Sanctimonious “Stain on Humanity” Speech
David Clews: I read that:
“It beggar’s belief, or at least it should be, that someone would want to speak these words, let alone feel the need to publish them for the consumption of others. You’re offending amounts, in my view, to a stain on our humanity, for our fellow humans.”
You want to remember tonight, this judge is probably home sitting in a big fancy house somewhere, loads of cash:
“How was work today, darling? Well, I jailed a stain on humanity! I put that racist in prison! Well done, darling!”
The Court Should Be Held in Contempt!
Do, you know how pathetic that is? And I often think of that if, dare I ever got into court, I mean, I would say that I hold this court in nothing but contempt! Because that is what we should hold them in, total contempt because they are not expressing the law! This is just opinions!
James Costello: It’s absolutely just a matter of opinion. And if the jury and the judge, and so forth, was so determined and fair, as far as I’m concerned, they would toss this thing right out of court.
David Clews: Correct.
James Costello: No doubt about it.
David Clews: Correct. And the point I make here and people need to realise this is even if you don’t like what James was talking about, fine.
However, very soon it will be anything! Whether you’re expressing doubt about vaccines, because they’ve started doing this, they talk about that “gateway conspiracy theories”. Like one minute you’re an anti-vaxer, the next minute you’re questioning some (((historical numbers))). The mainstream media do that! And what they’ll say is:
“Well, we need to sort this out early, because if we don’t stamp down on this early, not only will they be doing that, they’ll soon have guns and they’ll start going out shooting people!”
And unfortunately, again, a lot of the population will be like:
“Well, yeah, we’ve got to get them early, just in case they do it.”
Coming After the Easy Targets First and Then Others Later
James Costello: And what they do is target the easy targets, what they call the “easy targets” first. The James Allchurches of this world. Or some autistic young lad who’s just expressed an opinion on the internet, just trying to be a bit edgy or whatever, they come out on him like a ton of bricks, …
David Clews: Yep!
James Costello: Make it go crazy in the media so that everybody turns on this individual. But they’re just making an example out of that vulnerable person. Let’s call them what they are, “vulnerable people”. So that next, let’s come after those people who might express, as you say, anti-vaccine opinions or any other maybe opinions on (((history))).
You take your pick, but you start with the easy target first and then come after everyone. Similar to the way they did with statues. Let’s go after the slave owner first.
Next thing is they’re going after all the heroes of our history. And let’s trash everything!
Nothing That Sven Said was Ever Quoted in These Articles
David Clews: Yep! And it is frightening!
And again, even in that article when I was reading it, they don’t even have a sentence of the things that he said. There is no quotes. And I remember that from the case itself. I’m hearing the stuff he said, I said at the time:
“Look, yeah, I understand this might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but even based on their rules and their laws, this didn’t actually even break their Hate Speech laws.”
Now, I don’t think there should be any Hate Speech laws. I think they should all be gone. But even based on their supposed Hate Speech laws, he didn’t actually break any of them.
James Costello: I don’t believe. So I think that’s correct.
Again, if it can be interpreted in such a way and they do it. And let’s say, for example, there are people who are of certain ethnic minorities that whip up hatred against White people all the time, …
David Clews: Correct.
James Costello: I think there’s a term that was used quite recently, “hideously White!” Imagine you said that about another race. You probably end up in a jail cell, if you use that in connection with another race. Because that’s quite a harsh term, isn’t it? “Hideously” this, that and the other. If we were to say it in a Google ad basically, or certainly on a show trial! And that’s basically the current state of affairs.
I just encourage people who believe in free speech, even if you don’t necessarily agree with the opinions of likes of James Allchurch, to just support him based on your belief in freedom of speech.
It Does All Come Down to an Anti-White Agenda
David Clews: Correct. Correct!
And as you point out, though, James, it does all come down to an anti-White agenda. Because White people are not allowed to express themselves. We have had the ability to talk about things and issues removed from us. And our crime is our Whiteness! That’s our crime! Because it is part of the anti-White agenda.
James Costello: You’ve touched on it before and I saw it only yesterday. I went to a museum in Liverpool, and as soon as you walk through the door, you get again the big platitude on the wall “Black Lives Matter”, and it tells you how basically terrible White people are. And these are the places we go to to celebrate our heritage? And all we get told is that we should feel bad in some ways. Absolutely crazy!
The State Going After Easy, Weak, Targets
David Clews: Yeah. You know me, I’m a big softie. When I look at Sven Longshanks, James Allchurch, that is a guy, as you say, who is on a lot of medication. He has a walking stick. And he’s been made an example of!
And the thing is, the State isn’t stupid. The State won’t always go after the high profile figures because they know we turned against them. Like, remember the whole Count Dankula thing? That backfired on them because he was able to really get a big support behind him and everyone rallied around it.
So what they will do is they will pick on people like James to make an example of them. And that’s not a sign of a strong State, that’s a sign of a very weak State and a very weak government as well.
James Costello: Yeah, it’s such an underhanded thing to do, to pick on the most vulnerable.
I don’t know if I’ve said this to you already, but we were hoping that those myriad of health conditions and just because James Allchurch is such a reasonable person who’s bending over backwards to be reasonable with these people and saying:
“Look, I’ll present my views in a far more moderate way.”
We were hoping that that would get him a suspended sentence.
David Clews: Didn’t even get that.
James Costello: But evidently, couldn’t even get that. So, …
David Clews: He offended that judge. He offended that judge:
“How can anybody dare think that way, James!”
And as I said, the “poor judge” that had to go through that, he’s probably going to have PTSD now, because he’s a “good person” and good people don’t think that way.
And as you say, we don’t know what prison he’s in. James, is there any way people can support Sven, James? How can people support him right now? What can they do? I think maybe we’ll get his details and people could write to him in prison. That’s always quite a good thing, isn’t it, to do?
How to Help Sven – PO Box Details
James Costello: Yeah, well, we could definitely get that, the details for prison. Also, on his website, there is like a PO box that people could go to. And it’s box holder, PO box 274 Pudsey, Lima, Sierra, 280, Foxtrot, Quebec*. And that’s on his website. If people want to donate. I’ve already personally donated 100 pounds.
[* Box Holder PO Box 274 Pudsey LS280FQ]
David Clews: Very good of you.
James Costello: To help support him.
And if people can do that, at the very least, he’ll be able to support himself in prison, after this total injustice! Let’s call it exactly what it is.
David Clews: And, as you say, let’s hope he gets a decent prison sentence there. I put the link in there and everyone can do that and he’ll be able to, … Because, as you say, this is the other thing as well. You going to prison, which many prisons now have a very high ethnic minority population. And if they find out and get a sniff that you’re in there because you’re a “White supremacist” or “racist”, I mean, they’re not going to take kindly to it, I don’t think.
Prison, I mean, actually, I’ve never done any overnight time. Obviously, I’ve done 8 hours, which is I don’t talk about that much. But being in these prisons with gangs, …
Tyrant Legislation to Intimidate People Like Ourselves
James Costello: Yep. Especially being such a vulnerable person, this is just pure tyrant legislation to intimidate people like ourselves and send a message, as you quite rightly say.
David Clews: It’s vile! Well, James, I knew you were there for them. And we at UNN will be there to the best of our abilities. And I do stress that everybody, please keep sharing this. Let them know. And realise that this could happen to any of us.
And the guy who put the bacon on the mosque, what happened to him? Terrible stuff. The Batley Grammar School teacher as well.
As I said, like, Hope Not Hate had an article. I won’t share it, but you could see the glee! And people need to waken up to the viciousness of the enemy that we actually face.
James, thank you so much for coming on, okay!
James Costello: Thank you for having me. Goodbye.
David Clews: Good night, James.
(Comments as of 5/17/2023 = 3)
4 days ago
Huw Rees is a fucking clown.
4 days ago
political correctness is a control mechanism for the state and the Left
4 days ago
As I understand it from a Sven discussion, the police themselves had been listening to his speeches and determined that his earlier anonymous recordings used more colourful (illegal) language, but stopped after a time (post dox?) when deciding he wasn’t using unlawful language any longer. It’s best to always act as if you’re under scrutiny. Anonymity doesn’t really exist any longer.
- Total words in post = 4,849
- Total words in transcript = 4,352
- Total images = xx
- Total A4 pages = xxx
Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)
Version 1: Tue, May 23, 2023 — Published post. Includes comments (3).