Fred Reed – Not Naming the Jew

Posted on November 5, 2014 by admin

Opinions on

Fred Reed

Not Naming the … Jew

Version 2, Sep 20, 2015

Introduction

I solve a mystery for Fred Reed by Irish Savant

Letters About Jews – In Search Of Conspiracy by Fred Reed

Jared Taylor and Fred Reed by Streicher’s Ghost

Fred Reed and Me by Paul Gottfried

“American Renaissance: Racists or Diagnosticians?” by Fred Reed

Reading Reed by Fred Reed, correspondents, and A. Linder

What makes Freedy run by JC at VNN

Fred Reed and Me Who Are These Jokers Kidding? by Richard Hartmann

Letter to jew Gottfried by Chris Conole

Fred Reed, Paul Gottfried and Me by John “Birdman” Bryant

Version History

[NOTE: This post can be downloaded as a PDF file. See end of post]

Introduction

The following compilation of opinions on the topic of Fred Reed “not naming the jew” has been prompted by a recent blog post at Irish Savant, titled, “I solve a mystery for Fred Reed”. [1]

For over 10 years now Fred has written a satirical, non-politically correct column at his website Fred On Everything. [2] So far there are over 620 columns that deal with all the myriad ills that inflict American society with an emphasis on race, crime, religion, education and all other such related issues that crosses Fred’s radar.

All except one.

Yes, the jewish problem, question, issue, elephant in the room, etc.

As Savant wrote, it’s a bit like talking about the Titanic without mentioning that “iceberg incident”. For those who have woken up to the central role of jews in the ongoing destruction of White societies, Fred’s “hear, see, say no evil” on the jews is inexcusable.

In a 2004 column Fred does deal head on with the jewish issue and explains why he doesn’t mention jews. [3]

That column and responses to it from various websites are given here for the readers’ consideration.

My own take is that Fred, surely by now, is aware of the central and negative jewish role in what’s happening to our societies.

And yet he remains silent.

Needless to say, he’s doing a tremendous disservice to his readers and his race by not speaking up.

KATANA

November 5, 2014

[1] http://irishsavant.blogspot.jp/2014/11/i-solve-mystery-for-fred-reed.html

[2] http://www.fredoneverything.net/fred-columns.shtml

[3] http://www.fredoneverything.net/Jews.shtml
http://irishsavant.blogspot.jp/2014/11/i-solve-mystery-for-fred-reed.html

I Solve a Mystery for

Fred Reed

by Irish Savant

Monday, 3 November 2014

I’m sure that many of you read Fred Reed. I know Uncle Nasty to be a particular fan. And deservedly as Fred is a fine writer, experienced and highly intelligent. Having spent many years as a police reporter his take on the black undertow is searing and unsparing. Which explains why in this article he despairs at the degree of power wielded by such an undeserving and small minority.

“It is curious that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, should dominate national politics. Yet they do. Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can’t do. Blacks control what you can say to your own children in your own home.”

“Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces. Blacks must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where departments of Black Studies must be established to please them. Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of blacks. Obama was elected because he was black: an equally unqualified and negligible white pol would have had no chance. He is now fiercely pushing the most profound transformation of America ever attempted, by opening the floodgates to immigration from the south.”

Isn’t that powerful stuff?

He ends despairingly with;

“things that ought to be unbelievable, and once were, have become routine.”

And my God, that is the truth.

But the article, excellent though it is, suffers from an extraordinary omission. You see Fred metaphorically throws his hands in the air in complete bafflement at the fundamental question of how ‘the unbelievable has become routine’. In fact the explanation is there as plain as a pikestaff ……. for anyone who wants to see it. You see Fred, all of this unbelievable stuff becoming routine didn’t just happen, or happen overnight. The situation that had prevailed in the former Confederacy States (and in reality most of the others as well) until about the middle of the last century was the natural order whereby a low intelligence, violent and largely indolent racial minority were kept at arms length from Whites, miscegenation carried punitive social repercussions and indulgence of their lawless and violent nature guaranteed swift and severe retribution.

Similar dispensations have applied throughout the world since the dawn of man, simply reflecting the natural order. And you defy the natural order at your peril….. as most White Americans of the time understood at the deepest visceral level. So how then did blacks come to rule over us and the unbelievable become routine? It was one hell of a project and arguably one that had never been successfully undertaken before. It was multi-faceted and required a carefully co-ordinated set of self-reinforcing measures developed by a specialised Project Team

First item on the plan was ‘Civil Rights’ for blacks which set out with a number of seemingly reasonable proposals (who could object to nice Mrs. Parks moving up the bus?) but had as its ultimate objective the rendering of blacks impervious to criticism and judged on different criteria. Towards this end the Project Team set up a number of key implementation bodies such as the NAACP and ACLU, fronted by a few token blacks for the optics. So now blacks could go anywhere and any time. Problem was of course that the closer blacks got to Whites the less Whites came to like them. Which then gave rise to the most audacious element of all: The creation, a la Orwell, of a parallel universe, one where fact was fiction, war was peace. And black was white.

Thus academia developed bogus ‘equality’ theories of race, gender and culture, rewrote history to downplay the civilisational role of Whites and to overplay their alleged genocide and exploitation of the noble savages. Full spectrum media output reinforced these theories. Thus blacks had to be presented as intelligent, kind, honest …. and horribly done down by Evil Whitey. The ultimate target was the White Male, the embodiment of The Enemy. He had to be traduced, belittled, discriminated against through Affirmative Action, impoverished in marriage, emasculated by feminism, ultimately reduced to a hollowed-out husk ashamed of what he was and what his ancestors had been. But that still wasn’t enough. The screaming cognitive dissonance needed legislative enforcement to repel reality. Hence the introduction of a battery of ‘hate’ and ‘anti-discrimination’ laws aimed exclusively at Whites and enforced by politicised activist Federal judges.

So Fred, that’s really how the blacks came to power. The achievement of inducing the greatest civilisation the world has seen to destroy itself may appear magical (just like this guy). But when the Project Team control the media, ‘entertainment’ industry, finance and academia and have had centuries, nay milennia, to hone their repertoire of destruction maybe it’s not so amazing. Anyway Fred, that’s the mystery solved for you. But it wasn’t really a mystery, was it? I mean, you’re really smart, well read and have vast on-the-ground experience, and yet you avoid identifying The Project and the tribe who ran it. Which kind of defeats the whole purpose of your article, doesn’t it? A bit like describing the voyage of the Titanic without mentioning the incident with the iceberg.

No Fred, the shades, leather jackets, cigars and constant reminders of your ‘fearless’ and ‘scurrilous’ writings don’t cut it as long as you give the Third Rail — the fountainhead of the destruction you deplore — such a wide berth. Come on, you’d do a superb job if you chose to do so. You’re needs are modest. What’s stopping you?

———————————————–

http://www.fredoneverything.net/Jews.shtml

Letters About Jews

In Search Of Conspiracy

by Fred Reed

August 24, 2004

From time to time I write about the cloacal morality of the media as they go about wrecking civilization and annoying hell out of me. For rhetorical convenience I use “New York” and “Hollywood” as a sort of abbreviation for the news racket and the screen trades.

This column gets a lot email. Some of it assumes that “New York” and “Hollywood” are code words for “Jews,” and excoriates me mightily for not saying what I am assumed to mean. Let me give you a typical example, the subject line being “Fred Sees No Jews in New York and Hollywood.”

“Dear Fred,

Good greetings.

Your column on Television Tyranny and Degeneration is strong and important, as your columns usually are. But it also shows you’re unwilling to mention that Jews dominate these industries — again, as your columns always are scared to mention Jews.

You’re not ignorant that Hollywood and New York, movies and television, are Jewish. You’re unwilling to say so. You’re unwilling to state publicly the hatred consistently pumped by Jews into the Gentile populations they dominate, degrade, and destroy.

The fact that even Fred Reed submits to the taboo not to criticize Jews — no matter how obvious and ubiquitous is the power of Jewish degradation of Gentiles — is proof of the ruling power of Jews.

‘Hide the truth — protect Jewish power and degradation of Gentiles.’ That’s the policy Fred Reed follows, together with LewRockwell.com and everybody else.

Best wishes,

John”

Another:

“Fred,

I didn’t just get admitted to MIT – I got a PhD from there.

Now that I’ve got your attention, I’d like to tell you just how spineless I think your last column was in omitting the very obvious fact that JEWS have played and continue to play the largest role in television’s slow destructive agenda.

Jews have both a genetic and cultural desire to subvert and destroy their host civilizations – it is part of their survival instinct and it is what has caused their genetic strain and culture to survive for millennia.

The prevalence of Jews in television and advertising provides a powerful channel for those destructive urges to have their effect. One wonders whether this unprecedented opportunity for their hatred and contempt to be actualized will deliver the final blow to the tired host.

You’re no tough guy – forget the cigar and the leather jacket. I will take you seriously when you have the guts to offend the execrable self chosen.

Why are you so scared of Jews? Are you just a realist? Do you know more than I do about what they could and will do to you? Or are you just paranoid?

Vincent”

I admire the fearlessness of John and Vince in having me take on the Jews. “Let’s you and him fight” is an old call. Being weary of this stuff, I am going to do a doubtless overlong column on the subject, and then go back to better things, such as drinking beer with colorful reprobates.

Now, the conventions of discourse being what they are, it is hard to talk about Jews at all. If you say, “Some of my best friends are Jews,” it means you hate Jews. If you say, “I can’t stand the freaking Jews,” it means you hate Jews. If you don’t say anything, it means you secretly hate Jews.

If you say anything good about the Jews, it means that you are a tool of the Jews, or afraid of the Jews, or have had your mind clouded by Jews. Where does one go from here?

but wotthehell wotthehell.

The premises of letters such as the foregoing are invariant: (1) that Jews want to destroy all that is good and holy, and eat Christian children, and (2) that I know it. It then follows that, since I don’t say it, I must be either cowardly or collusive. The matter is always phrased as a manhood issue: Either you stand up to the Jews, or you lack balls. The Jews of course are a monolithic and conspiratorial group who rub their hands and say “Heh-heh-heh.”

Permit me a different interpretation.

Jews may be exotic in Peoria. (Or may not be: I have never been to Peoria.) In Washington, where I worked for years, they are as rare as automobiles. I have known lots of Jews. I have dated them, gotten drunk with them, danced with them, argued with them, gone on junkets to weird Asian countries with them. I liked most of them.

My favorite lunch buddy for a long time was a retired Harvard professor, Jewish, as decent a human being as I have ever met. My favorite dance partner was a Jewish radical feminist (I know, I know, but we liked each other) who was on an undefeated College Bowl team in the Sixties. My dentist was Jewish. The biochemist I used to windsurf with on the Potomac was Jewish. Beth, the pediatrician I dated at NIH, was Jewish, and an absolute sweetheart. I learned the Texas two-step from a Jewish carpenter (no, another carpenter) who moonlighted as a dance instructor. And so on.

Familiarity—not fear of invisible radioactive death-needles from Mossad, or of being run out of journalism—is why I don’t devote my life to obsessing about the maleficence of Jews. Are there Jews who do things politically I don’t like? Yes. Are there Jews who do things politically I’m not sure whether I like? Yes. Is there an Israeli lobby? Yes. Yet I have never encountered the evil Jews of The Conspiracy. I simply do not see them as bad people. I am not going to pretend otherwise to establish my virility for John and Vince.

In particular, I do not rave against the Israelis, because I don’t know what I think they should do. I note that their treatment of the Palestinians is indistinguishable from American treatment of the Iraqis and Vietnamese. Virtue does not exactly flood the world’s streets, anywhere.

Further, Jews as I have known them are not monolithic. Politically they have been all over the place, though running to liberal: a professional conservative (Herb Berkowitz, the PR guy at the Heritage Foundation, a raucous Boston Jew and delightful loon), a couple of AIPACers, (Seth Carus and Steve Glick, pro-Israel but, I’m sorry gang, not anti-American), libertarians, Greens, several with little or no interest in politics, some who in varying degrees disapproved of Israel.

I spent my high-school years aboard Dahlgren Naval Weapons Lab, living on Mathematicians Row (Caffee Road, just off the Circle). The names along the street were Cohen, Reed, Strauss, Kemper. I don’t know how they voted, but they designed armament for the Navy. I’d guess Republican.

I don’t see the Jews of the email. That Jews are tremendously influential in the media is a fact, easily verified on the Web. However, the leap from “Jews are powerful in the media” to “Jews are responsible for all social ills, the collapse of civilization, and everything I don’t like” is a bit of a stretch. Those I know have no idea why John and Vince loathe them, incidentally. Being hit on the head by a piano imparts little understanding of pianos.

Further, never do I encounter from the Johns and Vinces the idea that any Jew, ever, might have done anything good, however inadvertently. My experience is distinctly otherwise. For years I was a science writer in Washington. I spent countless days crawling through NIH, COMSAT, NASA, talking with Bell Labs and IBM Research, and places you have probably never heard of. (The PET lab of NIDA, National Institute on Drug Abuse in Baltimore, for example, then run by a very bright Jewish woman.) The number of Jews in research, and in high-tech industry, is wildly out of proportion to their number in the population. They are a mainstay of the American lead in technology. This is bad?

Let me tell you a story. In the early Fifties, polio was a nightmare for parents. Lots of children clunked around in braces or sat forever in wheel chairs. In summer, the epidemic season, our mothers wouldn’t let us go to public swimming pools because they were thought to be focuses of infection.

One day a fellow named Salk came out of a laboratory somewhere and said, “Hey, I’ve got this vaccine….” A bit later, a guy named Sabin came out of another laboratory, and said, “Hey, if we do thus and so and put it on sugar cubes, see, it will be oral….” You can’t imagine how welcome that vaccine was. Parents grabbed their children by the hair and sprinted through doors, sometimes not bothering to open them, to get to the clinic. Polio just flat disappeared.

Hint: Salk and Sabin were not Rastafarians. (“Jews Destroy American Iron Lung Industry.”)

Does none of this count for anything?

So many of the Jewish crimes popular on the email circuit don’t stand up to examination. For instance, I hear repeatedly that during Vietnam America won in the field but that Jews stabbed Our Boys in the back by means of the anti-war movement, thus seeking to promote godless atheistic communism.

Not quite. The leadership of the anti-war movement was heavily Jewish. The movement itself was overwhelmingly Christian. At the conservative Southern college I attended, the studentry to a boy wanted no part of the war. It wasn’t because of Jewish anything. It was because they didn’t want to get shot. Their girlfriends didn’t want them to get shot, nor did their parents.

People didn’t need help to weary of an endless, bloody, pointless war, in which their sons were dying, in a place they didn’t care about and could barely find on a map. Christian kids in huge numbers did everything they could to avoid Vietnam, which is why the draft was needed to force them to go. Christians like Dan Quayle, George W, and Bill Clinton sought student deferments or ducked into the National Guard. Check how many of the Christian elite from the Ivies served in Asia. The anti-war movement wasn’t a Jewish plot. It was a national revolt.

Most of the things Jews are supposed to be doing, on examination, they aren’t. Is globalization a Jewish plot (as I’m told), or the inevitable result of advancing technology? Is destructive feminism a Jewish plot, or the result of sweeping social changes in which women have found themselves thrown into unaccustomed and unsettling roles? Is the decline of education a Jewish plot, or the consequence of having teaching in the hands of intellectual dregs, of pandering by politicians for racial votes, and of the fact that Americans don’t really care about schooling? Etc.

That’s why I don’t gnaw at myself about Jews.

———————————————–

http://www.destroyzionism.com/2014/10/17/jared-taylor-fred-reed/

Jared Taylor and Fred Reed

Posted on October 17, 2014 by Streicher’s Ghost

After Jared Taylor was recently attacked in the media by someone with the suspicious name Robert Sussman, Taylor’s friend Fred Reed, who is married to a Mexican woman with Jewish ancestry, wrote a piece defending him on Amren’s website. He defensively goes into some detail about how non-racist Taylor is. I would like to focus your attention on the following passages:

Jared, as I would later learn, had often and on the record expressed his belief in the superiority of North Asians.

One thing he categorically is not is anti-Jewish. […] He is a proponent of White European civilization, to which Jews have been major contributors.

Taylor believes Asians are superior to Whites, and that Jews have been “major contributors to White European civilization” in a positive way. The race-mixer Reed, too, is a philosemite. Oddly, he at times – in the typical Jewish manner – claims Jews are “White”, but at other times distinguishes Jews from Whites in order to be able to claim the former group is superior to, or persecuted by, the latter.

Whatever Taylor and Reed are, they are not White nationalists or anything like it.

This entry was posted in Misc. Bookmark the permalink.

Putin: “Europe has lost its ‘vaccine’ against Nazism” Putin compares “neo-Nazism” to terrorism and drug trafficking

4 Responses to Jared Taylor and Fred Reed

Hadding Scott says:

October 17, 2014 at 10:47 am

The part that you elided from Fred Reed’s statement of why he says that Taylor is not anti-Jewish is significant:

“I have known a few serious anti-Semites. They are obsessive, constantly launching into the dammed Jews this, and the Jews that, and who do the Jews think they are, etc. Jared does not.”

See, Fred Reed has a caricature of an anti-Semite in his mind. In Fred Reed’s mind, every critic of the Jews is a crank. Because Taylor doesn’t act that way, Reed concludes that Taylor cannot be one of THEM.

If Fred Reed met me, he wouldn’t guess that I run a blog called National-Socialist Worldview either, because I don’t act that way.

The important question about Jared Taylor and Amren is: how would the White people who are Taylor’s subscribers and attendees be different without AmRen?

My hunch is that, without Tayor, they would have racial views about Negroes etc. but they would be less informed and less confident about expressing and defending those views.

You have to bear in mind that quietly racist conservative Whites are VERY COMMON, but most of the same people are strongly disinclined to criticize Jews. (Jew-criticism, from what I’ve seen, seems to be growing mostly on the left, not among the conservatives that are Taylor’s main audience.)

Another question is: do some of Taylor’s supporters become more radical after joining AmRen and seeing Taylor repeatedly attacked by individuals with names like Sussman?

I can’t believe that some of them don’t, especially since Taylor is publicly friendly with people like Kevin MacDonald who do criticize Jews. That’s going to tend to incline some of Taylor’s followers to find out more about MacDonald.

AmRen is like the proverbial half-filled glass of water. Many White Nationalists seem to notice only that the glass is half-empty. But attacking Taylor is not going to make the glass full, because, as I mentioned, conservatives are Taylor’s main audience, and most of them aren’t ready for that.. This kind of attack is more likely to discourage those conservatives from looking for more.

If you want to have some fun, go to Taylor’s conferences and ask with a perplexed expression why it is that Jews are attacking AmRen all the time.

Streicher’s Ghost says:

October 18, 2014 at 4:50 pm

It would be one thing if Amren and HBD types simply were quiet on the JQ in order to focus strictly on racial matters, but when they express sentiments such as those I quoted in this post, I feel criticism is appropriate. I agree that Taylor has done valuable work, but that should not mean that we can’t criticize him. The common White conservatives you refer to, who are scared of more radical views, are not the audience of this blog anyway.

Sickeningly reverent attitudes toward the jews and Asians who infest Western countries are far too common in the HBD “sphere”. To take an example, you might be familiar with the commentator who goes by the name “John Engelman”. I’ve actually banned him from this site myself: he came here to post about how evil I am for not liking jews. (Yes, he actually used the word “evil”. I wish I had taken a screenshot of the comment. He was quite upset, to my amusement.) He also firmly believes in the superiority of Asians. No doubt he and others like him hold these beliefs because HBD people go on about how smart and hard-working jews and Asians supposedly are. On that topic, “Truthteller” linked to an interesting thread about the underperformance of Asians. Many people also seem unaware of how Asiatic “model minorities” have undermined their host societies, see for instance the Japanese American Citizens League, and how they continue to do so.

Truthteller says:

October 17, 2014 at 6:26 pm

Jared Taylor and others are WRONG about the higher IQ and superiority of East Asians. That’s a pernicious lie:

http://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/4163-plagiarized-effortpost-on-studyasians/#entry182899

The “higher IQ” bullshit came from Richard Lynn, who derived his numbers for East Asia from unrepresentative/urban/elite samples. It’s amazing that the anti-racist crowd never called him on it.

James Flynn actually did look at the IQ studies for Asian-Americans and found that their IQs were actually slightly LOWER than Whites.

Steven says:

October 22, 2014 at 5:18 pm

Richard Lynn is quite the stephenjaygould of these studies basing the IQ of Ireland from a class of 31 children and 8 farmers. #TrulyASeriousAcademic

———————————————–

http://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/paul-gottfried/fred-reed-and-me/

Fred Reed and Me

By Paul Gottfried

Fred Reed and I have what seems to be a shared problem, receiving hallucinatory notes from anti-Semitic readers who insist, “the Jews are behind everything.” Perhaps I should feel honored that despite my family’s flight from the Nazis, I have been taken into the confidence of non-Jews who have the same grip on reality as the authors of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Like Reed, I also feel impelled to let my correspondents know that they have their heads screwed on the wrong way. How can Jews, who account for less than two percent of the American population and for less than that in Europe, explain the Western world’s descent into multicultural lunacy, including the advocacy of open borders, the glorification of the Muslims as a peaceful and enriching presence, and the treatment of homosexual relations as a privileged human association?

If one subtracted the Jewish vote in New Jersey, Connecticut, and Massachusetts, would these states be significantly less leftist in their politics? Most of the left-of-center votes (within our narrow party spectrum) cast in those states come from nominal Catholics, and these votes are given to social and economic leftists who are also usually self-described Catholics. Both the Eastern and Midwestern liberal vote is disproportionately Catholic and comes from non-Jews belonging to what used to be a very conservative confession. Unless shown differently, I shall have to conclude on the basis of my evidence that Catholics tend sharply toward the left in England and Canada as well as in the US. And, as far as I can tell, this trend has nothing significant to do with Jews inside or outside the media. I am also led to a similar conclusion about mainline Protestant church leaders, who sound politically and morally like Hollywood actors. Clearly these leaders are not imitating the politics of Michael Moore or Jesse Jackson because of their contact with Jewish journalists. Having just returned from listening to a Protestant convocation speaker at my college, whom most of my colleagues enthusiastically applauded, celebrating our “universal citizenship” and the imminent end of Western nation states, I am still searching for the smudged fingerprint of international Jewry behind these ravings. Those Jews who were present at the speech, one from Italy, were struck by the lack of reality of the speaker, who thought of himself as a “global citizen.” Perhaps my correspondents could have traced for them the causal chain by which Jews had brought such madness to American Christians.

Where I differ with Fred Reed, whose irreverent humor I have long admired, is in his concern about not appearing anti-Jewish. Fred goes out of his way to prove that he adores Jews, including Jewish feminists, and he hopes that Americans never forget the contributions of those identifiably Jewish scientists who helped end the polio epidemic of our youths. One may need to bring up here the problem of ascribed national grace. Am I supposed to like Abe Foxman, who blames everyone and his cousin for the Holocaust, because of the scientific prowess of Jonas Salk? This is a bit like suggesting that Hitler shouldn’t seem so bad once we realize that the Austrians also gave us Mozart.

In any case it’s irrelevant whether Fred Reed is socially simpatico with Jews in and around the District of Columbia for understanding what needs to be emphasized, that our cultural and political degeneration as a constitutional society has occurred largely independently of Jewish influence. Most of what my anti-Jewish correspondents lament could be accounted for without considering the Jewish-controlled share of the media or the impact of Jewish votes. The number of Jews in Sweden is negligible, yet politically and morally it is a far more radicalized country than the US. Perhaps the reach and behavioral intrusiveness of Swedish socialism may have more to do with this situation than the presence of a small stable Jewish minority in the country.

The Germans for decades have been raised to hate themselves as a people, and when Daniel Goldhagen visited this guilt-obsessed country after arguing in a book full of factual errors in 1996 that Germans killed Jews because they had all been “eliminationist anti-Semites,” he was wildly cheered wherever he went. The Germans have an organization “Anti-Deutsch,” consisting of thousands of young Germans, that demonstrates in favor of the saturation bombing of German cities in World War Two. But this weird organization is not Jewish; in fact Germany contains a far lower percentage of Jews than the US. To the response that Jewish groups have succeeded in making Germans hate themselves, the counter-response is obvious:

“Who the hell causes the Germans, except for the Germans themselves, to behave masochistically?”

And who orders white Christian Americans to yammer about their social sins and about the supposed evil of their national and civilizational identity? As my recent books try to make clear, there is something gravely wrong with majority cultures that ostentatiously despise their inherited identity — and there is no reason to assume that it would not be there if Jews or blacks disappeared. Daring Jews, like Noam Chomsky and Israel Shahak, who have played up Jewish bigotry and ethnic nationalism, have been widely denounced as “self-hating Jews.” But WASPs who dwell on their group’s prejudices and alleged hate-crimes can expect to be generally cheered.

I wonder whether my anti-Jewish correspondents have ever thought the obvious, that minorities often behave the way majorities want them to. America’s German and Sephardic Jews in the nineteenth century tried to model themselves on WASP high society, believing that they had to do so to move up socially and professionally. Today Jews who spew hate on gentiles also move up, because they are doing to Euro-American-Christians what the majority society wants, blaming that society for the ills of humanity and urging it to become a multicultural mess. This should not be read as a justification of the usual suspects but it is a reminder of why Dershowitz, Foxman, and Goldhagen make money and enjoy popularity among loads of Christians as well as Jews. Unlike nineteenth-century Germany or an older America, in our society it pays for bad-mannered, resentful Jews to exhibit their worst qualities. They are providing a morally confused and historically misinformed majority with what it craves.

August 28, 2004

Paul Gottfried [send him mail] is Horace Raffensperger Professor of Humanities at Elizabethtown College and author of, most recently, Multiculturalism and the Politics of Guilt.

———————————————–

http://www.toqonline.com/blog/fred-reed-on-american-renaissance/

“American Renaissance: Racists or Diagnosticians?”

by Fred Reed

Fred on Everything, March 13, 2010

Racism is in bad odor among the virtuous. I wonder why. At least, I wonder why any discussion of race is thought to be racism. The United States faces grave racial problems—more accurately, has them but doesn’t face them. Refusal to acknowledge their existence is not productive: Few problems are solved by forbidding their mention. The question should not be whether views are racist, but whether they are wrong.

American Renaissance, run by Jared Taylor, is quite racist in the poorly thought out and sniffish sense prevalent today. AmRen (as it is generally known) has recently gotten much bad press because it holds all manner of views whose mention results in pack attack by our arbiters of What Can Be Discussed: For example, that blacks commit violent crime at far higher rates than do whites, that massive immigration from Latin America offers no advantages to the United States but a great many evils, that affirmative action lowers the competence of government, the universities, and schools in general—and so on.

These ideas are no doubt racist, yes. Unpleasant, yes. But—are they wrong?

I would prefer to think so. It gives me no pleasure and little hope to hear that black schools regularly produce functional illiterates, that the schools of Detroit and of the nation’s capital and for that matter of wherever blacks predominate are disasters, that savage beatings of whites by gangs of blacks are common and hidden by the media. That these things happen is of no advantage to me. I would be delighted to see blacks and Hispanics excelling academically. I would like to walk the streets of American cities without carefully noting pigmentation, which we all do and pretend we don’t. While I like Jared personally, I would like to tell him that his racial ideas were all wrong.

But are they?

On AmRen’s web site you find news stories, taken chiefly from the respectable publications, that in aggregate paint a grim picture of things racial in America. Can you show these to be in error, isolated instances, not representative of a larger reality? I hope so. But I can’t.

Almost everything I read at AmRen well describes reality as I have seen it. And also as all cops have seen it, though telling what they know is a firing offense.

What we have is an ongoing catastrophe, documentable, indeed documented repeatedly but never openly examined. An apparent amicability is enforced by heavy federal pressure, by a press that censors itself, and by that poisonous fog that we call political correctness.

But consider. From the Detroit News, a story on the illiteracy of the president of the school board, as illustrated by his emails:

“If you saw Sunday’s Free Press that shown Robert Bobb the emergency financial manager for Detroit Public Schools, move Mark Twain to Boynton which have three times the number seats then students and was one of the reason’s he gave for closing school to many empty seats.”

Or:

“Do DPS control the Foundation or outside group? If an outside group control the foundation, then what is DPS Board row with selection of is director? Our we mixing DPS and None DPS row’s, and who is the watch dog?”

The president of the school board? Confusing “our” for “are”? My daughters had better grammar at the age of three. A city that has such a man in such a position has no place in a civilized country.

Below the surface of the ominous calm lies massive anger. Hostility to affirmative action runs rampant, whether against female firemen who can’t handle hoses or black teachers who can’t spell. The number of people who would happily run illegal immigrants from the country at gun point is huge. When the races are not forced together, they separate like oil and water. The forcing is national policy. It has not proved a recipe for domestic happiness.

The tendency toward segregation equally among the smugly correct and the contents of Joe’s Bar. Many years back, the Washingtonian, the vaguely heterosexual coffee-table magazine of the District of Columbia, checked on how many of the Washington Post’s news room sent their shiny white children to the city’s black public schools. Zero. At the first evidence of fertility the town house on upper Connecticut goes on the block and another pair of liberal diversity-friendly Democrats bail for the albino warrens of Montgomery County. Yet the Post honks and blows most mightily against racial discrimination.

How does this mandated hypocrisy help find a solution to racial woes—if there is a solution? It doesn’t. I suspect that a prime reason for the current uneasy stasis is exactly that people have concluded that there can be no solution. The best thing is to hold the lid on and let future generations worry about it.

Suppose that you genuinely want the best for what are quietly called Permanently Disadvantaged Minorities, and you therefore suggest that officials, to include teachers, whose English is below the level of second grade be dismissed. God help you. You will be called a racist, elitist, cultural imperialist, and insensitive, and lose your job. Why bother? All you can do as a responsible parent is to move away from the crime, to put your children in the whitest schools you can find, on the principle that most whites can still read. This of course perpetuates the problem.

The same fetor of impossibility engulfs any effort at change. If you try to end the calculated recruitment of incompetence that is affirmative action, you eliminate a large part of the black middle class (such as the above-mentioned president of Detroit’s school board) and hell breaks loose. What do you do?

Nothing. Which is what we are doing. It is what we will continue to do.

The folk at the American Renaissance? They don’t offer much in the way of solutions, but I don’t fault them for this since I can’t offer a solution either. Anything that might work is politically impossible, and anything that is politically possible won’t work. It may be that nothing would work.

Are Jared Taylor and his fellows wrong in their description of the disease? Let’s hope. But I fear they aren’t. Whether, or that, they are racists doesn’t matter. Oncologists recognize cancer. They don’t necessarily like it.

AmRen would be easy to dismiss if it were a pack of bedraggled Nazis ranting about how Jews sacrifice Christian children. But it isn’t, which is why it is disturbing. Normally a story like the foregoing appear locally and are carefully, carefully not picked up nationally. The race of criminals is usually suppressed. The “achievement gap” in schools gets occasional mention, but the gravity of the situation does not. Thus AmRen, aggregating these news stories without apology, constitutes a form of intellectual blunt trauma.

But is it wrong?

Please contact the Editor if you have news items that you think are relevant to TOQ readers.

Tags: American Renaissance, biological race differences, Fred Reed, Jared Taylor

Ethnic Hegemonies in American History, Part 1

Posted on Apr 14, 2010

Why an Alternative Right Is Necessary

Posted on Mar 2, 2010

Amren 2.0

Posted on Mar 1, 2010

Pro-White Conference 2.0

Posted on Mar 1, 2010

seadragonconquerer said:

March 15, 2010 at 12:17 am

Of course AmRen has the facts right. But since Amren is incapable of Naming the Jew – the collective master of the blacks and browns – it is incapable of “solving” the Problem, even in thoery. Fortunately, facts intervene. Our globalist ZOG is about to drown in its own debt (just today, it announced that social security is now in operational deficit, nothing in the trust fund but 2.5 trillion in IOUs that the rest of gov’t can only service by printing money) and, when it finally does drown, a solution (Civil War II) will be at hand. In the meantime, thank you, Am Ren.

seadragonconquerer said:

March 15, 2010 at 12:23 am

Of course AmRen has the facts right. But since AmRen is incapable of Naming the Jew – collective master of the blacks and browns – it is incapable of solving the Problem, even in theory. Fortunately, facts will intevene. Our globalist ZOG is about to drown in its own debt (just today, it announced that social security is now in operational deficit, and nothing in the trust fund but 2.5 trillion in IOUs that Treasury can only service by printing money) and, when it finally does drown, a solution (Civil War II) will be at hand. In the meantime, thank you, AmRen.

Hengist said:

March 15, 2010 at 9:17 pm

Fred Reed sure does like to pose as the maverick truth-teller, but never has the intestinal fortititude to actually strike at the root of our problems by naming and shaming organized jewry. He has even gone so far as to pen an essay, on his own sight, about his admiration of jews, and a demand to his readers, to STOP writing to him about them!

Make no mistake, Fred Reed is NOT one of us; he a mercenary, serving the purpose of controlled opposition, for his jewish masters.

HLN said:

March 18, 2010 at 6:27 pm

1. Repeal all the racial laws passed since World War II. They were totally wrong headed.

2. Give the whites their freedom to politically organize and make their white neighborhoods the way they did before, without apologizing to anyone.

There, half the problem is solved. Let the blacks come up with some ideas of their own for their solution.

———————————————–

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/v1/2004b/Linder82504ReadingReed.htm

Reading Reed

by Fred Reed, correspondents, and A. Linder

25 August 2004

Letters About Jews

In Search Of Conspiracy

August 24, 2004

[Comments in blue and within square brackets are from Alex Linder]

“Dear Fred,

Good greetings.

Your column on Television Tyranny and Degeneration is strong and important, as your columns usually are. But it also shows you’re unwilling to mention that Jews dominate these industries — again, as your columns always are scared to mention Jews.

You’re not ignorant that Hollywood and New York, movies and television, are Jewish. You’re unwilling to say so. You’re unwilling to state publicly the hatred consistently pumped by Jews into the Gentile populations they dominate, degrade, and destroy.

The fact that even Fred Reed submits to the taboo not to criticize Jews — no matter how obvious and ubiquitous is the power of Jewish degradation of Gentiles — is proof of the ruling power of Jews.

‘Hide the truth — protect Jewish power and degradation of Gentiles.’ That’s the policy Fred Reed follows, together with LewRockwell.com and everybody else.

Best wishes,

John”

Another:

“Fred,

I didn’t just get admitted to MIT — I got a PhD from there. Now that I’ve got your attention, I’d like to tell you just how spineless I think your last column was in omitting the very obvious fact that JEWS have played and continue to play the largest role in television’s slow destructive agenda.

Jews have both a genetic and cultural desire to subvert and destroy their host civilizations — it is part of their survival instinct and it is what has caused their genetic strain and culture to survive for millennia.

The prevalence of Jews in television and advertising provides a powerful channel for those destructive urges to have their effect. One wonders whether this unprecedented opportunity for their hatred and contempt to be actualized will deliver the final blow to the tired host.

You’re no tough guy — forget the cigar and the leather jacket. I will take you seriously when you have the guts to offend the execrable self chosen.

Why are you so scared of Jews? Are you just a realist? Do you know more than I do about what they could and will do to you? Or are you just paranoid?

Vincent”

I admire the fearlessness of John and Vince in having me take on the Jews. “Let’s you and him fight” is an old call.

[I might interject here that I’ve written Fred Reed more than one letter saying exactly the same thing these writers do, and I have been fighting the jew in my own name publicly for 4+ years now, so Fast Freddy’s being disingenuous. His “let’s you and him fight” is a writer’s cleverness, a mischaracterization worthy of the jews he fears to name, and yes, fear is the word, for he has written very explicitly about media control, and you can rest assured he has read all the jew-crit out there, and “Who Rules America?” more than once. Two of the formulations in his most recent were practically verbatim, ie, no king of old ever had the power exercised by today’s mass media. Cut the bullshit, Fred. Enough with the WASPing, already. You’re needed in the fight.]

Being weary of this stuff, I am going to do a doubtless overlong column on the subject, and then go back to better things, such as drinking beer with colorful reprobates.

[Funny, but beside the point. As Fred knows. Quit trying to country-boy us, Reed. Some of us city folk are nigh as clever as you sophisticated shitcrickers.]

If you say anything good about the Jews, it means that you are a tool of the Jews, or afraid of the Jews, or have had your mind clouded by Jews. Where does one go from here?

[Now Fred, to make it real simple-like, the question on the table is why you syncopate: why you refuse to mention jews where they’re the operative agent. You don’t do that in any other case. Just with jews. When it comes to blaming jews, a writer is guilty until proven innocent. That is the only rational way to treat the matter, given the conditions of employment you yourself have described — most principally the absolute fear of offending politically powerful groups. Well, there’s no escaping it, Fred. Jews are the most powerful group out there, and if Fred Reed spends all his columns criticizing the horrible state we’ve fallen into without ever once criticizing the jews who produce that state, then something’s funny in monkeyland.]

but wotthehell wotthehell.

[This is Jim Goadlike. No man as cautious as the self-proclaimed rebel in his Commander Salamander get-up. Reed is fearful there’s something there. This is the source of his “weariness.” He prefers the simple life, the not-fully-knowing. So in this column, unlike others, he affects to deal with the issue as a way of dismissing it, for good if he’s lucky. “Let me sleep,” whines drunk, spent Fred. He doesn’t want The Burden. It is hard to style yourself the crazy and fearless rebel when you avoid the battle of your times. Fred’s got a rep, even if it’s self-made. You see the delicate stepping required. Not easy to do with a head full of maragarita.]

Permit me a different interpretation.

[Fred is apparently the only man in history who’s never met a dishonest or detestable jew. Or maybe he’s simply being selective in the jews he chooses to cite — i.e., guilty of exactly that with which he charges his jew-critic correspondents.]

Familiarity-not fear of invisible radioactive death-needles from Mossad,

[Fred mocks the idea that Mossad murders people. Is Fred unaware that Mossad murders innocent people? Or he just finds it funny? I don’t get it Fred. Are you saying that the Mossad doesn’t murder people, or that the murders are matters for jest? It sure reads like that. I guess the jews didn’t put out a press release that henceforward they’d be murdering people wherever they damn well felt like it, including within the borders of the United States. Nothing to see here, folks, just a lot of conspiracy kooks.]

or of being run out of journalism

[but, but, you just wrote a column the other week (Fred uses frames, see “An Oozing Of Gray Sludge”) describing how easy it is to get kicked out should the tiniest organized minority group be offended. Back in April you said:

Everyone in the [media] racket knows exactly what you can’t say and what you have to say. Thus what reporters know, they don’t say; and what they say, they don’t believe.

You seem to have changed your tootle, Marse Fred. Should we believe you when you’re lying, or when you’re lying about lying?]

-is why I don’t devote my life to obsessing about the maleficence of Jews. Are there Jews who do things politically I don’t like? Yes.

[Notice how Fred falls into Polspeak, into jewspeak, the minute he finds ground he fears to tread. Um, your column ostensibly answers the questions of your jew-critic readers, Fred, not your own self-posed, self-serving queries. Quit playing the system pol and start playing the smart hick we love you for. The fact that you feel you need to bolsters the case you feign refute.]

Are there Jews who do things politically I’m not sure whether I like? Yes. Is there an Israeli lobby? Yes. Yet I have never encountered the evil Jews of The Conspiracy.

[Again with the mocking. ‘Conspiracy’ is a trigger for laughter, which is why Fred chose it. Like any good writer, he can be as precise or comic as he feels serves his purpose. Here his purpose is to disguise his purpose. Very jewy of him. And no coincidence it comes in defending his jew-position. His aim is to make it appear to the reader he’s addressing serious concerns of the jew critics, while actually avoiding so and in the process affirming that, by gum, all the jews he come across be the echtest huntin’ buddies a good ol’ boy could ever track possum with, or whatever it is they ambush for vittles down in that Crawdad County his country-fried Grobnik hails from. Hey, Fred: that dog won’t hunt! Isn’t that clever? I made it up myself. Ok, I’ll come clean. My jewish friend thought it up, and graciously, as characterizes the nature of those well-nosed noblemen, allowed me not just to use it, but to claim credit for it, him being too busy with curing AIDS to turn his hand to matters literary.]

I simply do not see them as bad people. I am not going to pretend otherwise to establish my virility for John and Vince.

[Fred sidesteps the issue, which is whether jews operate as a group against Aryan interests, not whether they’re good or bad. He knows they do, so he pretends the question is how he feels about a handful of individual jews. One might know a number of mob members, and find them great people. Does that mean the mob does not exist, or that it is not a collective negative for non-mobsters? Does it mean that those who complain of it can be dismissed as a conspiracy nuts? Fred?]

I don’t see the Jews of the email. That Jews are tremendously influential in the media is a fact, easily verified on the Web. However, the leap from:

“Jews are powerful in the media” to “Jews are responsible for all social ills, the collapse of civilization, and everything I don’t like” is a bit of a stretch.

Those I know have no idea why John and Vince loathe them, incidentally. Being hit on the head by a piano imparts little understanding of pianos.

[The jew is the victim of the goy? Haven’t you ever met any noble anti-Semites, Fred? Haven’t there ever been any anti-Semites who did the world good? Shakespeare? Wagner? Pound? Luther? Mencken? Not one?]

Further, never do I encounter from the Johns and Vinces the idea that any Jew, ever, might have done anything good, however inadvertently.

[Maybe that’s for two reasons: the good jews have done is very little by comparison with the enormous evil; the jew-controlled media keep up a continual harping on jewish gifts to the world, at least in the interstices between cries about the “Holocaust.” Fred again disingenuously acts as though he’s willing to consider objectively whether or not jews are a collective negative for goyim. He isn’t. Fred is bullshitting.]

My experience is distinctly otherwise. For years I was a science writer in Washington. I spent countless days crawling through NIH, COMSAT, NASA, talking with Bell Labs and IBM Research, and places you have probably never heard of. (The PET lab of NIDA, National Institute on Drug Abuse in Baltimore, for example, then run by a very bright Jewish woman.) The number of Jews in research, and in high-tech industry, is wildly out of proportion to their number in the population. They are a mainstay of the American lead in technology. This is bad?

[Jews fill out the ranks of the bureaucracy Fred in every other column laments, drawing huge salaries, contributing nothing, and we’re supposed to thank them for it? It must be all the Aryan burrocrats who are the real evildoers, eh Fred? The computer revolution that characterizes our time, technologically, was brought about by Aryans, not jews.]

Hint: Salk and Sabin were not Rastafarians. (“Jews Destroy American Iron Lung Industry.”)

Does none of this count for anything?

[Not if you don’t count the diseases jews spread. Funny that it always comes back to polio, doesn’t it? The one example the jews can cite. Fred should be aware, but probably is not, that jews often take credit for the work of others, as Einstein did with his E=mc2, stolen from an Italian named Olinto de Pretto, or put their name on what was actually a group effort, as Paul de Kruif recounts in The Sweeping Wind. How many times has an Aryan developed a test, a jew merely applied the test to a disease — and then claimed credit for the breakthrough? It is telling that Reed takes immediate recourse in the jews’ own bleat, the moment they’re criticized. And again Fred begs the question: are you really willing, Reed, to make a credit/debit accounting of jews and their activities in relation to goyisch interests? You aren’t. You fake it for rhetorical purposes. You think anyone’s buying that ol’ Fred Reed wants to get to the bottom of Big Jew? I don’t.]

[This simply is not true. The jews were not only fifty percent of the anti-war leaders, they formed a hugely disproportionate percentage of the rank and file. This matter has been studied. Fred’s anecdotes fall before facts. Fred also ignores the flip from sixties radicals to nineties conservatives, and the tie that binds — in both cases the radical-cons were jews pursuing jewish interests.]

[After a point, perhaps, but this again avoids the issue. I haven’t seen a single person blame the jews for stabbing us in the back in Vietnam. I have seen them charge the jews with promoting the P.C. “ideals” of the counterculture in order to complete the long march through the institutions and bring judeo-communism to America behind the banner of peace, love and brotherhood, saving the earth, multiculturalism, diversity and the rest of the semitically correct garbage. Jews defending jewish interests in the name of humanity, in the name of objective science — this is what jew critics claim, and this is, in fact, what occurs.]

[Fred shows he’s either uneducated, or unable to dig out the root. All these questions are long answered, the information readily available. But why bother researching what you’ve no interest in printing? Safer not to know. Just another burden, and Freddy’s all about staying footloose and fancy free; a drink in one hand, a cockroachita in the other.]

That’s why I don’t gnaw at myself about Jews.

[Those who defend jews invariably fall into the same evasions and mischaracterizations jews use. We aren’t asking you to gnaw yourself, Fred. We’re asking you to write about jews the same way you’d write about any other group acting the way the jews do. Quit wasping already, Freddy.]

====================================

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=53570

August 4th, 2007 #6

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 5,331

What Makes Freedy Run

He has been too close to the problem. Can’t see the forest for the trees. He was the son of a bright, well-paid father who worked in the Washington, DC military-industrial establishment and was raised a suburbanite when DC suburbs were the country. I rambled Robert E. Lee’s Northern Virginia and Maryland’s Eastern Shore, when I was a boy. Hence Fred’s tales of hanging out with other country boys with which he shared some experiences like the woods, the river, and other bucolic joys of better times but not everything. Ultimately it was the indulgence of those who ran/run things that permitted his daddy the luxury of working and living where he pleased. That rubs off on you. And it rubbed-off on Fred.

Next puzzle piece: Fred also worked in Washington, DC, Vietnam for a season, and lived or died by what he could sell to the mass media essentially of entertainment rather than so called news. Like Iraq, first the usual suspects wanted the Vietnam war and then they didn’t, at least in the media, and such gyrations destroy the self esteem of a people, who are then ripe for all manner of folly that those who foisted those shameful, barbaric frauds on them claim will restore their sense of pride, e.g., the Civil Rights Movement. “Now go and do the right thing.” It is that environment of journalistic schizophrenia (and government schools and one’s parents, probably in that order anymore) that is all most American’s have ever known from which to form their opinions and prejudices. Fred has a sense of humor and made a living in it commenting on the emperor’s new clothes — to a point.

Believe me, Fred gets your point. He is perfectly capable of understanding, say, Kevin MacDonald. He just can afford it emotionally. No doubt his self esteem is bound up in his audience, his lifetime associates, people who would denounce him with a shriek like Donald Sutherland’s in the remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

Fred is not going to suddenly eschew the line of court employees from which he’s descended. Better to simply be a jester and act with apparently reckless abandon, almost crossing the line drawn by those who trade in the orgy of White nation destroying, without risking beheading by explaining exactly who is doing it and why. It may no longer be a matter of putting food on the table but it is certainly a habit and maybe genetics.

You are aware that he lives with a smart, motivated, personable, Latina in Mexico.

All this works fer Fred.

He has talent, yes, and, glib as he is, you’d love to have him on your side. Zebras however are not apt to change their camo.

———————————————–

If the American people ever allow a central bank to control of the issuance of their currency, the banks and the corporations that will grow up around them will, first by inflation and then by deflation, deprive the people of their property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. –Thomas Jefferson

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/NetLoss/NetLoss-HartmannAnswersPaulGottfried.htm

Fred Reed and Me

Who Are These Jokers Kidding?

by Paul Gottfried

[with commentary by Richard Hartmann]

30 August 2004

[Original here. Richard Hartmann comments in square brackets, blue text.]

PG: Fred Reed and I have what seems to be a shared problem, receiving hallucinatory notes from anti-Semitic readers who insist, “the Jews are behind everything.”

RH: [Now, does anyone really say that? I don’t believe it for a second. Why the need to distort and ridicule? Would Paul Gottfried or Fred Reed care to publicly debate Alex Linder or myself? “Bring it on.”]

Like Reed, I also feel impelled to let my correspondents know that they have their heads screwed on the wrong way.

[Again. Why the need to insult and degrade? Nothing but respect and decorum for the “nuke the Arabs” crowd, but open season on the Jews’ critics?]

How can Jews, who account for less than two percent of the American population and for less than that in Europe, explain the Western world’s descent into multicultural lunacy, including the advocacy of open borders, the glorification of the Muslims as a peaceful and enriching presence, and the treatment of homosexual relations as a privileged human association?

[To put the question another way, How can the jews, who account for less than two percent of the American population, own nearly all of the news and entertainment media, which are the primary formative influence over America attitudes and opinions and have been for more than half a century. How can the same jews constitute the leadership of nearly all organized leftist political and intellectual activity over the past century, including Marxism and neo-conservatism. Easy. It’s in their interest to do so, so they do it. They have the power to do it through their dominance of the mass media, their financial power and organization.

Billy Graham to Richard Nixon:

“This stranglehold [of the jews on the media] has got to be broken or the country’s going down the drain.”

“You believe that?” says Nixon

“Yes, sir,” says Graham.

“Oh, boy,” replies Nixon. “So do I. I can’t ever say that, but I believe it.”

Who else in 1965 had the motive or the ability to open America’s borders? Who else wanted that? Was it Irish and German pressure groups who pushed for these changes? Was it organized Baptist pressure that influenced lawmakers to vote for these acts? Is this what Gottfried thinks? Does Gottfried not know that more than 50 percent of the Democratic party’s finances come from Jewish donors? Historically speaking the Democratic party has been the jewish party; jews being the only group on the left with any wealth or power or influence. Was it rich white gentiles in the media who advocated every destructive leftist policy and program and political and social attitude? Was it white gentiles who gave Hollywood it’s character? Where are all these white gentiles? Where is the white gentile conspiracy? All I see is powerful jewish organizations, jewish dominated mass media, and a lot of career-minded and deluded camp followers.

Gottfried and Fred Reed know that we’re fighting a war with Iraq for Jews. Is this not so? Are they denying this? They understand that our whole foreign policy in the middle east is geared toward securing jewish interests. How could this be if the jews only constitute 2% of the America population and don’t have the power to shape policy and public opinion? Why is public opinion always against any group the jews are against? Why do Americans despise Arabs as much as they do ‘white supremists’ and did Germans? The rosetta stone of American politics: Jewish interests. Jewish interests dictate the meaning of political correctness as disseminated through the mass media. As jewish interests change, what is politically correct changes: that is why the ‘liberal media’ today are firmly behind the war in Iraq, flags a-flutter on every screen since 911, a neo-fascism in the works. The executives didn’t change. Their ideology didn’t change. Conditions changed. The new patriotism is kosher: it is in jewish interests. Racism is politically correct — acceptable, anyway — as long as it is directed against the jews’ enemies. The anti-war movement has no steam — it is still out there, wondering why things aren’t working the same this time. Here’s why: there is no jewish interest in and no jewish support behind it; no jewish leadership, organization, financial backing and media placement. And so it is not politically correct. Jewish interests — the key to understanding American politics.

The Jews constitute far less a percentage of the population of most European countries than America, and yet in these countries it is illegal to speak against jews or their genocidal multi-racialist policies. Are jews not actively pursuing the same legislation here? Does the FBI not go on about it’s partnership with the ADL? How could this be when the jews are but a 2% minority? Are you guys kidding?

When the jews of Clinton’s administration (Sec of State Albright, Sec of Defense Cohen, Nat Sec Adv. Berger) bombed Serbia for its ethnic policies, and all the mass media and all of the major jewish organizations in America supported this campaign, which NATO General jew Wesley Kahn Clark explained thusly:

“There is no room in modern Europe for ethnically pure states,” were there any other groups seriously advocating it? No, but everyone else went along and kept their mouths shut. It was the power of the media to shape public opinion and distort the facts which mattered, and enabled the jew-dominated Clinton government to pursue this policy.]

If one subtracted the Jewish vote in New Jersey, Connecticut, and Massachusetts, would these states be significantly less leftist in their politics?

[OK, Saul, and what if you subtracted jewish money from the bargain, not just now, but for the past 50 years? There would be no Democratic party. There would have been no civil rights movement, no money for it, no legal representation for it. There would have been no pressure on Congress to change the immigration law in 1965. And what if the media had been staffed with white gentiles instead of jews during this period? And the film industry? Paul Gottfried: a jew, so a liar.]

Most of the left-of-center votes (within our narrow party spectrum) cast in those states come from nominal Catholics, and these votes are given to social and economic leftists who are also usually self-described Catholics. Both the Eastern and Midwestern liberal vote is disproportionately Catholic and comes from non-Jews belonging to what used to be a very conservative confession. Unless shown differently, I shall have to conclude on the basis of my evidence that Catholics tend sharply toward the left in England and Canada as well as in the US.

[Are you suggesting that there were no Catholics, or substantially fewer Catholics, in the ‘20s, ‘30s, and ‘40s, and ‘50s, prior to the influence of television and the jew-led counterculture of the 1960s? No. But regardless of whether they voted for Democratic or Republican economic policies, the social and racial policies that came to characterize the left in the 1960s and 70s and now the right of the ‘90s and ‘00s, did not even exist; they had not yet been popularized by the jewish media and the jew-led counterculture.

The whole country has moved in a certain direction, shaped and prodded by the influence of the media, and that is what counts. Not who votes for what political party. The same political parties operative 150 years ago are operative today on completely different principles; they conform to public opinion, not shape it. The purpose of their organization is not to advocate principles, but to garner votes and a share of power by appealing to the public and making themselves useful to various interests. What matters is public opinion, and this is shaped by the mass media.

The character of politics in America has changed immensely during the past 50 years, reflecting the changes in public sentiment brought on by the influence of television and jew-led political and social movements.]

And, as far as I can tell, this trend has nothing significant to do with Jews inside or outside the media.

[Well then you don’t know shit.]

I am also led to a similar conclusion about mainline Protestant church leaders, who sound politically and morally like Hollywood actors.

[Corrupt church leaders are just trying to sell themselves to the public, as always. They conform to the attitudes of the public, whereas the media shape those attitudes. Church leaders, business leader, entertainers, and everyone else operate in an atmosphere over which they have little control; they have to conform to political correctness; the jews of the media shape it. But you liars are content to speak about political correctness as though it were a force of nature, mysterious and unexplainable, unrelated to any real interests or tangible power.]

Clearly these leaders are not imitating the politics of Michael Moore or Jesse Jackson because of their contact with Jewish journalists. Having just returned from listening to a Protestant convocation speaker at my college, whom most of my colleagues enthusiastically applauded, celebrating our “universal citizenship” and the imminent end of Western nation states, I am still searching for the smudged fingerprint of international Jewry behind these ravings.

[I’ll help you find it. Could these people have found any audience willing to listen to them 60 years ago? No, not more than a few thousand lunatics nationwide would have listened to them. Now they have half the public willing to listen to their mad ravings due to the influence of Hollywood and jewish television on public opinion over the past half century. It’s the same with our popular culture. Degenerates and antisocial elements have always existed in society. Now they’re given record contracts and television shows by the controlling jewish executives. There are many elements of decay, but none would have had any serious effect without the jewish power element.]

Those Jews who were present at the speech, one from Italy, were struck by the lack of reality of the speaker, who thought of himself as a “global citizen.” Perhaps my correspondents could have traced for them the causal chain by which Jews had brought such madness to American Christians.

[Ahem. The jewish victory in WW2, and the European defeat; the defeat of nationalists everywhere in Europe, set the tone for the subsequent decades. Nationalists everywhere were banned or exiled and leftist governments installed. There is no free speech in Europe, no right to bear arms; not since the US occupation of 1945. Europeans have been swallowing American-jewish culture for 50 years. If the European nationalists had defeated the Soviet Union, instead of the US and the Soviet Union conquering a half of Europe each, how would Sweden’s culture be today? Or England’s? Or Italy’s?

Would these nations be on the verge of destruction now, with below replacement level birth rates, flooded with foreigners and laws against nationalist political activity, laws against speaking out against the jews and their policies? Would American-jewish culture; Hollywood, MTV, rap music and modern art, be the culture of Europe? No. Only because Europe’s resistance to the jews was defeated in WW2; Germany, Italy, and nationalistic volunteers from every country in Europe, is Europe now on the brink of destruction. The shaping influence in modern western society: the media, is almost entirely in jewish hands.

The changes that have taken place over the past 50 years have been engineered by these jews, in service of jewish interests. They are not a coincidence, they are not a natural development, they are not and never have been inherent in the western character. Jews have not ‘gone along with it;’ they have led it, and are benefiting from it. Alongside the destruction of European society has arisen the state of Israel, which is now poised to become a world power, dominating all of the middle east.]

Perhaps the reach and behavioral intrusiveness of Swedish socialism may have more to do with this situation than the presence of a small stable Jewish minority in the country.

[Hmmm… your theory seems to break up upon the fact that German culture without jewish influence, i.e., in the 1930s and prior, was anything but anti-German, and it took the most destructive war in history and the guilt-inducing psychological warfare and lie campaign of the post-war period to destroy the German national character the way it has been destroyed. Likewise European culture was more or less healthy and developing in a healthy direction up until WW2.]

And who orders white Christian Americans to yammer about their social sins and about the supposed evil of their national and civilization identity?

[Bogus question. Who ever claimed they were acting on orders? When you’re raised and formed in an atmosphere in which these ideas are dominant then you cannot be held responsible for accepting them. What you should be asking is who is responsible for creating this atmosphere and these ideas and imposing them on us, not blaming school children and television viewers for being victims of this brainwashing. But then you’re a jew — you’re not ‘us.’ It should not surprise us that you want to shift blame to the victims of the brainwashing and away from the jewish brainwashers. And it should not surprise us that certain career-minded folk want to blame abstract “cultural marxists” and “secular humanists” or a “western death wish” instead of a real, tangible group with power that will retaliate when its interests are threatened. Many a former employee of somewhere has learned this over the years: Congressmen, journalists, teachers, etc. But don’t worry, Saul, not all of us have swallowed the brainwashing, as your emails indicate, and you can be sure that those who are responsible will be held responsible.]

As my recent books try to make clear, there is something gravely wrong with majority cultures that ostentatiously despise their inherited identity — and there is no reason to assume that it would not be there if Jews or blacks disappeared.

[But we already know this to be false if we examine the jew-free cultures of Germany and Italy in the 1930s and the culture of the European world in general before WW2. The entire intellectual basis for the leftism of the post-war era was formed by jewish intellectuals during this century and the latter half of the last. Marx, Freud, Boas, the Frankfurt School, and all the rest. Will Gottfried deny this?

These jewish movements were run out Europe in the 1930s and ‘40s. They came and set up shop in the United States and moved into the universities, eventually coming to dominate the intellectual climate of American academia. These jewish intellectuals did not behave like objective students of their fields; they had no tolerance at all for disagreement. They reviled and ridiculed anyone who dared to disagree with their ‘theories,’ or should I say, who obstructed their agenda, and in this way the basis for “political correctness” was laid.

It was the jewish victory in WW2 that enabled leftism to contaminate the European world. It was the lack of serious nationalistic resistance in America to these jews that set the stage for the post-war counterculture which enveloped the universities and popular culture, and it was this lack of resistance to the jews in America that had allowed our military might to be used to crush the nationalistic resistance in Europe 20 years earlier. This is why Europe is now dying, because all of its healthy elements, it’s nationalistic elements, it’s whole political and cultural leadership, was exterminated by the victorious allies of WW2, America and the Soviet Union, and replaced by a jewish culture and leftist leadership.

This idea that there is something inherent in our European character that causes our people to act against their own interests or to hate themselves is a vicious lie. European societies have existed for thousands of years without any sort of leftist or self-destructive tendencies. The development of these tendencies go hand in hand with one thing: the emancipation of jews and their entry into European society during the past two centuries. Jewish interests and jewish influence are the basis of leftism, nothing else! To say otherwise is an insult and direct attack upon Europeans everywhere! It is a deliberate lie aimed to mislead and confuse us and exonerate our enemies, or else a ploy by hacks to protect their own asses. Anyone who protects our enemies must be treated like an enemy!]

Daring Jews, like Noam Chomsky and Israel Shahak, who have played up Jewish bigotry and ethnic nationalism, have been widely denounced as “self-hating Jews.” But WASPs who dwell on their group’s prejudices and alleged hate-crimes can expect to be generally cheered.

[Cheered by some, while others remain silent out fear of ostracism, fear of being politically incorrect, and in much of Europe fear of being locked up. Yes, leftism is white self-hatred. But for the vast majority of jews who are leftists, and who make up the leadership of leftism, it is not self-hatred, but white hatred. White self-hatred is induced by these jewish leftists, their media influence, their intellectual and cultural influence. The whole jewish-leftist intellectual atmosphere on college campuses and the corresponding propaganda of the media is a jewish program, a jewish campaign aimed at advancing jewish interests and securing jewish power, by destroying potential sources of resistance to jewish preeminence.

Only by destroying the self-confidence and self-image and identity of whites and suppressing nationalism everywhere can jews hope to retain their dominance over the culture and politics of western societies. Jewish leftists are not ‘ideological,’ they’re merely pursuing their own interests. At the same time that they’re ‘leftists’ they’re also Zionists and supporters of the state of Israel and its policies. While 80-90% of American-resident jews vote for the Democrats, 90% of them are also pro-Israel. They’re only ‘leftists’ when it comes to harming us, when promoting policies that harm us.

In Israel they support ethnic cleansing, ethnic exclusivism, expansion and military conquest. Here they promote multiculturalism, white guilt, universal tolerance and political correctness. It is perfectly consistent: among themselves they promote what serves their group, among us they promote what serves their group by harming our group. There is no contradiction when you understand the basis of their activity. Leftism is simply jewish politics in a gentile society; jewish intellectuals, jewish money, jewish organizers, jewish propagandists, advancing jewish group interests by rendering harmless potential sources of resistance to themselves: nationalism, racial identity, cultural cohesion, religious identity, etc. Leftism is the jewish program for subduing a nation and bringing themselves to power in it; destroying the nation’s pride and self-confidence and cohesiveness, and thus creating conditions in which jewish power can thrive unopposed. Seriously, how is it that in a country that is 90% Christian, public displays of Christianity are practically illegal? It is the jews alone who wanted this, for fear of the potentially antiSemitic consequences of a strong Christian identity in the population and the effect such might have on their status and position. And at 2% of the population they’re able to do it, they have the power.

It is no different where race is concerned. Racial identity is as much a threat to the jewish dominance of western societies as religious identity; any identity, any cohesion among our people is a danger to jewish power over us. It is jews alone who have had the motive and the ability to suppress nationalism throughout the western world for the past half century, jews alone who have blocked the advance of right wing and nationalistic political movements; through censorship, through distortion, through ridicule and demonization, through financial and media pressure; jews alone have had the motive and the ability to suppress nationalistic feeling and political activity in the white world. And what they’ve done to us is precisely what they want to do to the Muslim world, and for this reason want to use American military might to subdue the Muslim world and open it up to jewish influence. How long before Hollywood movies and jewish television programs come to dominate the culture of the new Iraq? How long before Judeo-Islam is proclaimed, and Sunni preachers are bewailing the historical guilt of the Muslim peoples for their intolerance and anti-Semitism? Well, that is how the jews would have it. That is what they’re aiming for. It isn’t just about Israeli security, it is about total jewish control.]

[Bullshit. jews have been the foremost subversives and radicals, actively trying to overthrow the status quo and gain influence and power, as jews.]

Today Jews who spew hate on gentiles also move up, because they are doing to Euro-American-Christians what the majority society wants, blaming that society for the ills of humanity and urging it to become a multicultural mess.

[Bullshit; they’re not conforming to our way and never have. We’re conforming to them, to the culture they’ve built for us in order to advance their interests. They’re the ones with the power, not us. They remain as jewish as they’ve ever been; we’re just ceasing to be white.]

This should not be read as a justification of the usual suspects but it is a reminder of why Dershowitz, Foxman, and Goldhagen make money and enjoy popularity among loads of Christians as well as Jews. Unlike nineteenth-century Germany or an older America, in our society it pays for bad-mannered, resentful Jews to exhibit their worst qualities. They are providing a morally confused and historically misinformed majority with what it craves.

[Jews are the leadership, the shapers of the modern anti-white culture and intellectual paradigm you lament. And it is anything but harmful to themselves. Rather, they are in their element now in the West, more powerful than ever before, with a dumbed down, self hating population of dazed media-slaves to use and exploit. Jews get their empire in the middle east while white kids die to secure it, and we Europeans and Americans get racial oblivion in the coming decades.

I’ll have a few jews sum it up:

Earl Raab:

“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible — and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.” (Earl Raab, Jewish Bulletin, February 19, p. 23)

The ADL’s Earl Raab served for thirty-five years as Executive Director of the San Francisco Jewish Community Relations Council and is currently Director of the Perlmutter Institute for Jewish Advocacy at Brandeis University. Raab, like most Jews and all Jewish organizations, promotes multiracialism and nonwhite immigration in the United States and other majority-White nations, while supporting Jewish racialism (Zionism) and a Jews-only immigration policy in Israel.

Philip Weiss:

“Remaking the American power structure without Jews is like remaking sports without blacks. At least when it comes to blacks in sports, you can talk about it; you can say that blacks changed sports. But no one is allowed to speak up about something we all quietly know: Jews changed America.”

“There is hardly an area of public life on which Jews have not had a profound impact in the last generation, as discrimination against them ended and as they gained power. The civil rights movement reflects Jewish values of justice. Feminism is a reflection of liberal Jewish matriarchal values (note the Jewish groups that are talking about Roe v. Wade in opposing John Ashcroft for Attorney General). Ever-more-powerful Jews in the media have ushered in the information age. Psychologically attuned Jews and Hollywood Jews changed the language of popular culture-Seinfeld, Weinstein… altogether they represent the force of Jewish values coming into public life.”

“…the greatly diminished influence of church on public mores wouldn’t have happened without secularized Jews gaining cultural power.”

“And no one ever talks about it. The most important change in establishment culture in the last 25 years, and it goes unspoken.”

“There are so many Jews in the media that the cone of silence falls over the territory where you might expect wider discussion.”

“I remember when I got to Harvard in 1972, and all my outsider Jewish energy was focused on tearing down the WASP bastions that kept me back. And we tore them down.”

“… Jewish imagination has been the most powerful force in elite life in the last generation…the celebration of feminism, the emergence of the media: all have been spearheaded by Jews who re-imagined America.”

“So long as Jews continue to see themselves as powerless, they fail to recognize the effect they have had on society and come to terms with their real spot: big winners in the new order. It looks like the next chapter in the democratic discourse is going to be about winners and losers in the globalist pursuit of excellence.”

(“Jews in Bush’s Cabinet? Don’t Hold Your Breath” by Philip Weiss, New York Observer, December 22, 2001)

Fuck you, jew Gottfried, and fuck you, jew-tool Fred Reed.

Fondest wish: That one day we can state truly, “Like all jews, Paul Gott Fried!”

RICHARD HARTMANN]

Back to VNN Main Page

———————————————–

http://www.heretical.com/miscella/fredtv.html

Letter to jew Gottfried

30 August 2004

Dear Mr. Gottfried,

You and Fred Reed deserve credit for at least addressing the anti-Semites who dog you so. No doubt it was enervating to receive all that crank email insisting that the Jews are behind our cultural melt-down. You and Reed seem to place a great deal of emphasis on weight of numbers as your argument, but a quick look will show what a red herring the numbers argument really is.

When the British ruled India in the 19th century, they ruled a sub-continent of some 300 million people with an army of soldiers and civil servants of what, some 200,000 men. That’s a ratio of over 1000-1 of ruled to rulers! Yet I suppose the story of British rule of India is a myth, since the numbers offered are so lopsided.

I weigh just a little over 200 lbs. My Cadillac has an empty weight of over 5000 lbs. I thus weigh a mere 4% of my car’s weight and can’t even muster 1% of its horsepower. I suppose the next time a cop pulls me over for speeding, I can say:

“But officer, this car is so vastly heavier and more powerful than me. How in the world could I possibly control it? Do I really deserve this ticket?”

If he lets me off the hook, I will honor you and Reed by naming it the “Reed-Gottfried defense.”

The individual AIDS viruses in one infected human body, I would guess, don’t even weigh 1 gram by the time they dispatch their victim. So maybe Thabo Mbeki was on to something when he said publicly that the HIV virus couldn’t possibly cause AIDS.

Maybe you would accuse me of spurious reasoning for using my above mentioned British rule of India argument, since the English had all the guns. But if the pen is mightier than the sword, how much more powerful than the pen is the cathode ray tube? Do you believe the networks that supply the ammunition to all those tubes are controlled by self-hating Presbyterians? Mormons? Quakers?

I’m sure that you would object that the vast majority of American Jews don’t live in Hollywood or New York, and thus bear no blame for the sewer that popular culture hath become. Fair enough. The next question is: What is it about Jewish culture that creates the Dershowitzes and Wolfowitzes, Spielbergs and Spellings and other riff-raff that leads our nation, and all other western nations, into the abyss?

Could it possibly be due to the fact that as a minority culture living amidst majorities for at least 2,000 years, the Jews require a low-intensity antagonistic relationship with their gentile hosts in order to preserve their separateness amongst an otherwise tolerant gentile community that, over time, would absorb the Jews among them due to mere strength of numbers? Perhaps the truth is that if anti-Semitism didn’t exist, it would be necessary for the JEWS to create it!

The reason that I am telling you this is that if any Jew can understand the “anti-Semitic” argument, it’s you. If you can’t understand anti-Semitism, then no Jew can. What is anti-Semitism, after all, but normal human reaction to Jewish behavior? And who is better equipped to study Jewish behavior than you?

This letter to you can be understood to be a last gasp, if you will, to get you and your kind to understand and cross the vast gap that exists betwixt us twain. Your ancestors have created it, therefore your people must surmount it. Otherwise your family’s trauma at the hand of the Nazis may be revisited on you in your lifetime.

Not a threat, or even a promise, but just a warning.

It’s the least I could do.

CHRIS CONOLE

—————————————

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/NetLoss/NetLoss-FredReed,PaulGottfried&Me.html

Fred Reed, Paul Gottfried and Me

By John “Birdman” Bryant

Fred Reed is a sharp critic of multiculturalism, and a clever and funny writer to boot, and I post his essays from time to time on my Daily Reads page. But Fred, like so many other ‘blight wingers’, is scared shitless of the Jews, which is a bad way to be if you are going to criticize the multicult — it’s a lot like trying to win a footrace with your leg cut off. But then Fred writes in defense of American freedom while living in Mexico, and there is a certain natural awkwardness in that, too.

In any event, awhile back Fred wrote a piece posted on Lew Rockwell’s website entitled “Don’t Write Me About the Jews” (http://www.lewrockwell.com/reed/reed42.html; durable link here), in which he attempted to prove to his critics that he was perfectly justified in treading lightly around the Foreskinners. It was a well-written piece, as most of Fred’s pieces are, but in terms of the bottom line, it didn’t cut the mustard or even muss the custard. Here is what I wrote to Fred in response to his piece:

[Begin]

Date: 8/27/04 10:43 AM

To: Phred1@fredoneverything.net

From: John Bryant

Subject: Da Jooz — Don’t miss this one, Fred

Fred:

I’m a member of the high-IQ organization Mensa, have written 40 books, and am listed in Who’s Who In the World.

Now that I’ve got your attention, let me tell you the Good News and the Bad News. And then the REALLY BAD news.

The Good News is that my personal experience with Jews is — like yours — both lengthy and positive. If you wanted to you could say that I am — or was — prejudiced FOR Jews.

The bad news is that my POST-judice is AGAINST Jews. By which I do not mean personal — I still like most of them, find them fun, intelligent people. More precisely, my post-judice is against ORGANIZED JEWRY. Which is not about what this or that Jewish individual does, but rather what JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS AND JEWISH LEADERS DO.

Now the REALLY BAD news is this: I did not reach this conclusion on ‘gut feeling’ or intuition or what my parents or my guru told me. I reached it on the basis of WHAT I HAVE BEEN READING AND RESEARCHING FOR YEARS, THE BEST ITEMS OF WHICH I HAVE RECORDED IN DOZENS UPON DOZENS OF FILES IN MY POPULAR WEBSITE, THEBIRDMAN.ORG. More bluntly, I have a HUGE collection of stuff that — IMHO — simply leaves no doubt that the Jews are a BIG BIG PROBLEM FOR GENTILES AND WESTERN CIVILIZATION.

But there’s more, Fred. First of all, I have organized this material into sections and subsections and subsubsections that will make it easy for you (or anyone) to just go to my website and click the Articles of Others section, and immerse yourself for as long as you want on the subject.

And that’s not all, Fred. I have written several lengthy articles intended especially for novices such as yourself to lay out the facts in simple, easy-to-digest form. Two of the best of those are the following:

(!) The Case Against the Jews: A Documented Critique of Contemporary and Recent Historical Jewish Behavior — The Birdman’s hardest-hitting, best-documented and longest essay on the Jews. If you are serious about knowing the facts, read this tightly-written piece. This is a much-improved version of an essay sent to 3500 people on the Mensa email list, which resulted in more than a hundred yelping and snarling responses — which might not be so bad considering that there were 3400 people who didn’t complain.

This article can be found at found at: http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-CaseJews.html

(2) Updating the List of Jewish Crimes — Jews continue their assault on the white race and Western civilization by laying the foundations for World War Three; for it is Jews who are almost certainly primarily responsible for 911 and the bogus ‘War on Terrorism’, the later of which has so far brought us two real wars (Afghanistan and Iraq) and a further shredding of our Constitution. (Don’t believe it? The proof is RIGHT HERE.) This was the Birdman’s 2003 letter to Mensans, and, as usual, the Uno Hooze and their shabby goy gofers promptly got Birdman’s ISP account canceled. Why is it that ‘Jews’ always seems associated with such things as ‘cowardice’, ‘hypocrisy’, ‘underhandedness’, ‘suppression’, ‘censorship’ and ‘lies up the tush’?

This article is located at:

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Mensa-UpdatingJewishCrimes-MensaLtr2003.html

But remember, Fred, this is only a beginning. There’s lots more in the Jewish Question section of my webpage if you care to educate yourself. But of course if you stick with Little Lew-Lew and his sidekicks, you won’t find out a thing, because these people are some of the biggest hypocrites and liars around, to say nothing of being frosty-frizzy-cataleptic afraid to touch the Jewish Question with a ten-foot pole. And if you have any question about the intellectual sleaziness of the Rockwellites, just check the Rockwell Files in the Net Losses section of my website.

It’s all there, Fred. I’ve spent years putting it together. But I am sure that you, like so many others who — in the words of Peter Finley Dunne — know so much that ain’t so, will have absolutely no trouble in ignoring it.

-Birdman (www.thebirdman.org)

[End]

After penning (keyboarding?) the above piece, someone alerted me to a piece by Jewish Prof Paul Gottfried which he wrote in defense of Fred. I found Gottfried’s work almost as irritating as Fred’s, so I sent him a copy of my Fred letter for his comments. This set off some relatively meaningless comments from Gottfried in a couple of email exchanges, so finally I wrote him the following letter:

[Begin]

Dear Prof Gottfried:

Let me go back to the beginning, so to speak, and get things properly straightened out.

In your article ‘Fred Reed and Me’ (I know you are trying to echo something in that title, but I can’t quite think what it is — certainly not ‘The Egghead and I’), posted at

http://www.lewrockwell.com/gottfried/gottfried63.html

[Durable link here]

you write:

“Fred Reed and I have what seems to be a shared problem, receiving hallucinatory notes from anti-Semitic readers who insist, ‘the Jews are behind everything.’ Perhaps I should feel honored that despite my family’s flight from the Nazis, I have been taken into the confidence of non-Jews who have the same grip on reality as the authors of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Like Reed, I also feel impelled to let my correspondents know that they have their heads screwed on the wrong way. How can Jews, who account for less than two percent of the American population and for less than that in Europe, explain the Western world’s descent into multicultural lunacy, including the advocacy of open borders, the glorification of the Muslims as a peaceful and enriching presence, and the treatment of homosexual relations as a privileged human association?” [END]

When I sent you a copy of my letter to Fred, what I was doing, to put it in simplest terms, was to lay down a challenge to both you and Fred on your basic thesis — expressed in the paragraph above — that it is nonsense to say Jews exert significant control over America and the world, and that, by means of this control, they are significantly responsible for what we all hate, namely, the decline of Western civilization via multiculturalism and similar liberal policies.

Fred is not going to take this challenge. In spite of his leather jackets, cigars and ability to eat tequila worms, he is a pussycat on the Jewish Question. In fact, he is laying low in all probability because — to coin a phrase — in his heart he knows I’m right.

But you are different. You are a scholar, and hold an academic position. And you have reflected on this subject in several books, as I understand it. So it is right up your alley, scholastically speaking.

Now you can accept my challenge, or you can ignore it. (As I often say, you can lead a horse’s ass to ‘oughter’ but you can’t make him think.) I expect the latter, because the material I have is simply too devastating to your position. But maybe I’m wrong — maybe you have the guts to accept it. That doesn’t mean you will come to agree with me (or say you agree, even if you secretly do), of course, but at least you will have grappled with my material, and there is something good in that.

Now having laid out my challenge to you, let me comment on several items.

You protest about all the ‘delusional antisemites’ who are always saying that da Jooz are responsible for ‘everything’. Very crudely speaking, and without all the qualifiers, modifiers, ifs, ands, buts, adverbs, adjectives and gerunds, that’s what I’m saying too. But you have a problem in dismissing me as a ‘delusional antismite’, because (among other things) you reviewed — very briefly — my book on Jews and had a favorable word to say on it, even if nothing that amounted to a Great Panegyric. So on that basis alone, you have created your own reason for looking at what I have to say.

But I think you are wrong to dismiss the people who write you as ‘delusional antisemites’. On the contrary, they are people who see you as maybe — just maybe — a Jew who is openminded enuf to hear them out, and someone who will give their concerns a reasonable hearing. Or to put it another way, they are saying two things: First, they are complimenting you, and second, they are not petitioning some Aryan war council to ‘gas all Jews now’, but are rather coming to a Jew and asking for an explanation. They are saying, Surely, as a reasonable person, you can see how the Jews are abusing us, so why not support us? If that’s delusional, maybe you’re speaking a different language. (He-Brew?)

Now if you wish to talk about delusion, let’s mention something that is not a delusion: The Jewish Question is forbidden to be discussed EVERYWHERE THAT IS ‘RESPECTABLE’. Only in the ‘disreputable’ places like my website is such discussion allowed. And the only reason YOU are able to ‘discuss’ this question is because YOU TAKE THE POLITICALLY CORRECT SIDE. Which of course is not discussion at all — just MONOscussion. Lew Rockwell wants to be ‘respectable’, hence he has turned his website into yet another engine of Political Correctness which does not allow honest discussion on what I and a great many others consider the MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION OF THE DAY. Does it not give you pause to realize that the platform from which you speak will not allow discussion of the most important question of the day? If you were really honest, it seems you would not give Rockwell your imprimatur, because in contributing to a website that supposedly enshrines ‘freedom’, you become a silent partner in the hypocrisy.

If you want my opinion (and you probably don’t), I think you are the one who is delusional, because you are being deluded by your own logic. That is, you argue in your first paragraph, How can the Jews possibly control America/the world — there are so few of them! It is a clever argument, and readily invites assent. There is only one problem — in Huxley’s words (or was it Mencken’s?), it is a beautiful theory that has been slain by the ugly facts. I have already set out those facts in great detail and at length, and will not try to summarize them in 25 words or less. It is up to you to read, mark, learn and inwardly digest them — if you have the stomach.

If there is any weakness in my thesis, it is most probably to be found in the matter of identifying ‘cause’. As a philosopher, you are undoubtedly familiar with the literature on cause, and the fact that cause — contrary to common misconception — can only be analyzed as ‘invariable connection’, and not as ‘agency’. What this means — briefly, and without proper qualifications — is that we can say that A causes B only because B is invariably preceded by A, and not because we can divine some ‘deep’ connection between the presence of A and the subsequent occurrence of B.

The relevance of the cause question to my thesis is that one can argue that Jews are not the ‘cause’ of the decline of the West, but rather there are numerous ‘causes’, from the discovery that God is dead to the invention of contraception and venereal prophylaxis. There is not exactly anything ‘wrong’ with this approach, and to some extent an analysis of the cause of the decline of the West because of the decline of religion, etc as opposed to Jewish influence is dependent on one’s purposes and one’s view of what is important. There is, however, a scientific criterion that sanctions the analysis in terms of Jews — economy and elegance — and a utilitarian one, practicality. By economy and elegance I am of course referring to Occam’s Razor, or the Law of Parsimony, which decrees that the simplest explanation which fits all the facts is to be preferred to others; and by practicality, I mean that there is nothing we can do about the demise of God, etc, but a few things we can do about Jews. Thus the cause argument becomes a matter of deciding whether the Theory Of Everything Jewish is best because it fits all the facts, or whether we must adopt something more messy because it doesn’t.

While we are on the subject of cause, let us consider your statement:

“As my recent books try to make clear, there is something gravely wrong with majority cultures that ostentatiously despise their inherited identity – and there is no reason to assume that it would not be there if Jews or blacks disappeared.”

Here you could say that whites are responsible for (i.e., a cause, or THE cause, of) their own downfall, and there is some merit in that statement. HOWEVER, one may also look at the situation as one produced by the Jewsmedia which have infected whites with the virus of self-hatred; and in such a case we can wonder who really deserves the blame. (My own rule of thumb is, Don’t blame others if you can blame yourself. tho this may be a tough sell when we consider that a person could always have taken SOME precaution that would have stopped whatever incident is under consideration, from which we must conclude from my rule that we must ALWAYS blame ourselves.)

Thank you for hearing me out. I will be eagerly awaiting your reply.

[End]

[As an aside, another writer, Richard Hartmann, responded to Gottfried’s article with an inspired piece that deserves careful reading, and which I briefly quote from in succeeding correspondence. Durable link here]

[Gottfried responded to me with the following short paragraph:]

On 9/3/04 at 9:10 AM Paul Gottfried wrote:

Obviously we cannot reach agreement on this point because of the superhuman power you attribute to organized Jewry and the incorruptibility of Euro-American society. If gentiles were as gullible as you suggest and if Jews were as brilliant, it would be poetic justice for the Jews to dominate. PG

[I replied:]

That’s a cute point, Paul — you are telling me that if the Jews really do have as much power as the ‘bigots’ say they do, then it is right for Jews to dominate. But then your logic would imply that, if the ‘bigots’ had the power, then it would be right for THEM to dominate — and maybe run you and your fellow ethnics thru the ‘gas chambers’. Which is of course to say that — had the nazis had homicidal gas chambers in which they aerated Jews, then they, too, would have been perfectly justified in doing exactly that. Very good, Paul! A Jew that supports nazi homicide! We really must bruit this one about! And I shall surely do so!

But, just like in all our previous correspondence, you miss the point — apparently deliberately. Because you have put on an image of a Jew willing to see Jewish faults, to criticize other Jews, you have had innumerable gentiles stretching out their hand to you in more-or-less friendship, asking you reasonable questions about the behavior of your fellow Jews. Asking why these Jews are trying to put white Western culture six feet under. Your response — in the face of a mountainous assemblage of evidence — is to airily dismiss the claim of Jewish dominance as absurd. So not only do you spurn gentile hands offered in friendship; not only do you insult these people by saying that the elephant in the livingroom is nonexistent; but you show yourself as totally intellectually dishonest, and functioning as yet another cog in the Jewish juggernaut that is rolling over the greatest civilization ever created, and one which has given Jews the greatest opportunity to survive and prosper that they have ever had.

Really, Paul, you have simply forced me — a Jew-friendly gentile — into the same corner where not-so-Jew-friendly Richard Hartmann found himself in analyzing your essay on ‘Fred and Me’, and I quote:

Fuck you, jew Gottfried, and fuck you, jew-tool Fred Reed.

Postscript:

When people find out what you’ve said, Paul, and the laughter and guffaws and the I-told-you-so’s begin, you are going to start whining that ‘dominance’ doesn’t necessarily mean ‘genocide’. Well, maybe genocide isn’t a logical consequence of dominance, but ‘dominance’ in this context clearly means that the fate of whites is in the hands of Jews, and what hope is there for whites in that case? You don’t just have to look at the Jewish scriptures which refer to gentiles as ‘cattle’: you don’t just have to listen to rabbis saying that goyim are not worth a Jewish fingernail; you don’t just have to see how Jewish-supported programs from feminism and minority rights to immigration and integration are destroying the white race; rather you have only to look at the real world example of how the Jews treat Palestinians, which is just like Jews fantasize that the nazis treated Jews. Which is to say that you can take your poetically-justified dominance and shove it right up where your head is.

But maybe you will claim that all you are advocating is the good old evolutionary struggle of ‘survival of the fittest’, which may confirm that nature’s red in tooth and claw, but hardly that she should be condemned because of it. That move, however, transports our discussion out of the realm of morality, and in fact renders it moot by saying ‘Que sera, sera’ (Whatever will be will be). It is in effect an assertion that nature has no moral rules, so the Jews need not have them either. But then we are right back to where you positioned yourself — if inadvertently — on the ‘gas chambers’: for if nature has no morality, and this implies that neither the Jews nor the nazis need it, then you are again forced to condone (supposed) nazi genocide, or indeed, anything whatsoever. Is that what a Professor of Philosophy is going to do?

A final note: One of the key concepts of cybernetics/systems theory is that large forces may be controlled by small ones. The classic case, of course is ‘the button’: If the President pushes it, he can destroy the world. In your case, you claim it is absurd to think that Jews can ‘control the world’ when there are so few of them; but in doing so, you reject the concept of cybernetics just stated. More particularly, when Jews are at the two great chokepoints of Western civilization — the media and the money system — there is little else that is not within their reach.

So, have you had your butt whipped enuf yet, Paul?

[Not to anyone’s surprise in this neck of the woods, Gottfried did not reply.]

Followup — 3 years later:

To: Fred Reed

From: John ‘Birdman’ Bryant (www.thebirdman.org)

Date: 31 July 2007

Dear Fred:

In response to your 30 July 2007 column on ‘The Crimes of Jews’ at

http://fredoneverything.net/FOEFrameColumn.htm

I have just one basic thing to say: You are as DISHONEST AS HELL. While I have several reasons for saying that, the main one is just this: YOU REFUSE TO ACQUAINT YOURSELF WITH THE FACTS, EVEN THO THEY HAVE BEEN OFFERED TO YOU ON A SILVER PLATTER.

Let me explain. About 3 years ago, I wrote you the following letter which is permanently posted on my website at

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/NetLoss/NetLoss-FredReed,PaulGottfried&Me.html [this file]

In that letter I offered you the facts about ‘the crimes of Jews’, as you so mockingly refer to them, in the form of several urls. Basically what I offered you were two things: First, a collection of my own essays on Jews which summarize and analyze the facts, and which are found in the Jewish Question section of my website at

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Index-Jews.html

and second, a HUGE collection of articles setting forth the facts upon which these essays are based, and which are so voluminous as to require being divided into the following TWENTY-SIX categories:

911

ADL

Catholics&Christianity

CivilRights&Minorities&Immigration&Integration&Multiculturalism

Communism

Crime&Fraud&QuestionablePractices

Expulsions&Antisemitism

General&Msc

Holocaust-ConcentrationCamps

Holocaust-DebunkingLies&Liars

Holocaust-Exploitation

Holocaust-General

Holocaust-Genocide

Holocaust-HolocaustsCausedByJews

Holocaust-TheSixMillion&OtherNumbers

IntimateRelationToNazis

Israel-General&Msc

Israel-Torture&Terror&War&Racism&EthnicCleansing

MediaBias&Control

National&InternationalConspiracy&NWO

Parasitism Power&Influence&Dominance

Quotations

Religion-Hatred&Barbarity&Bizarrity

Sex&Porn&Prostitution&Decadence

Spying&Subversion

You can access this list of urls from the Articles of Others section, located at

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Index-Others.html

Just scroll down to ‘Jews’.

Let me say it again, Fred:

FIRST, there is a HUGE COLLECTION OF FACTS THAT PROVE ‘THE CRIMES OF JEWS’

and SECOND, you are as DISHONEST AS HELL BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO ACQUAINT YOURSELF WITH THEM WHILE SMEARING THOSE WHO SEEK TO INFORM YOU WITH GRATUITOUS INSULTS such as the one in your present article which reads:

“I get a steady rivulet of strange mail telling how horrible Jews are. Apparently there is no crime of which they are not guilty. I find myself wondering: How do they find the time to be so evil? Are they on amphetamines or something? A curious odiousness runs through it. I don’t care whether you like Jews, but these birds need their heads examined.”

No, Fred, we do not ‘need our heads examined’ — rather YOU NEED TO EXAMINE THE FACTS. OK, maybe you don’t think they are facts. Maybe they have been blown out of proportion. Or maybe they omit vital information. But so far, no serious questions as to their veracity have been put forward. One thing that HAS BEEN put forward, however, is the laws of numerous countries which make it illegal to state these facts. And why would that be, Fred? There can only be one answer: BECAUSE THESE FACTS REFUTE JEWISH LIES AND EXPOSE JEWISH COVERUPS.

So maybe it is YOU who needs your head examined for ignoring the elephant in your livingroom while smearing the people who point it out.

Got that, Fred?

Love and kisses,

Birdman

PS: Speaking of honesty, Fred, I have a very special way of guaranteeing that I am honest. Anyone who has a serious criticism of me will get an answer, and if there is any major substance to the criticism, that criticism (and my answer) will be posted on my website. Then my readers can judge for themselves whether I am honest or dishonest, right or wrong, sane or crazy. As far as I know, I am the only website in the world that follows such a policy. So, based on the above policy, I am offering you a chance to embarrass me on my own website. Answer my letter, and I will post it, in however many exchanges of correspondence you want to have. Then we will let the readers decide whether it is you or whether it is I who is honest, or right, or sane. And you don’t need to rely on just my readers — bring your own by informing them of our correspondence. Or post it on your own site. But of course you won’t, Fred. You won’t because you are fundamentally dishonest. And ignorant. And planning to stay that way.

Freedom isn’t free! To insure the continuation of this website and the survival of its creator in these financially-troubled times, please send donations directly to the Birdman at

PO Box 66683, St Pete Beach FL 33736-6683

“The smallest good deed is worth the grandest intention.”

Please contribute today — buy our books — and spread the word to all your friends!

Remember: Your donation = our survival!

* * * Back to the Home Page of John “Birdman” Bryant, the World’s Most Controversial Author * * *

———————————————–

Version History

Version 1: Published Nov 5, 2014

__________________

Note: This document is available at:

https://katana17.wordpress.com/

—————————————————————-

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (1.0 MB). With images >> Fred Reed – Not Naming the Jew

Version History

Version 5: Feb 4, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

Version 4: Jan18, 2018 — Improved formatting. Added image of the “elephant in the room“.

Version 3: Sep 21, 2015 — Improved cover image.

Version 2: Jul 4, 2014 — Improved formatting of quotes.

Version 1: Published Nov 5, 2014

This entry was posted in Christainity, Evolution, Fred reed, Germany, Jews, Jews - Naming, National Socialism, Negros, Race, Third Reich, White Nationalism. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Fred Reed – Not Naming the Jew

John Engelman says:

June 9, 2015 at 00:33

The only people who have problems with Jews are people who cannot compete with them. Anti Semites resent Jews because of the superior intelligence of Jews, and the prosperity it earns them.

Reply
katana17 says:

June 9, 2015 at 13:19

Thanks for the laugh, John.

You’re spouting an anti-goy canard, as they say.

Reply
John Engelman says:

June 10, 2015 at 11:08

Just because I love Jews, Judaism, and Israel does not mean that I am “anti-goy.” I admire Jews because of their intelligence, their success, and their prosperity. Jews are moving up. They are moving in. They are going to the best universities. They get the best jobs with the most prestigious corporations.

Reply
katana17 says:

June 10, 2015 at 13:08

Just because I love Jews, Judaism, and Israel does not mean that I am “anti-goy.”

——————
Well if you are not “anti-goy” then your love of jews, etc., is not very strong. If you really loved jews you would hate “goys” as demonstrated by organised jewry’s actions carried out against Whites in the past 150 years or so. It’s jewish hatred of Whites that have caused them to engineer the third world invasion of White countries, for example.

I admire Jews because of their intelligence, their success, and their prosperity. Jews are moving up. They are moving in. They are going to the best universities. They get the best jobs with the most prestigious corporations.

——————-
Jews that are highly successful do owe it to their intelligence and hard work, etc. No doubt. But I would say the major factor leveraging that by a factor of ten is jewish nepotism, jewish immorality and general criminality when it comes to dealing with non-jews. Just a word to “uncle” Shlomo will get you that promotion over ten more qualified “goys”, etc. Please read some of the posts on this site that show this going on.

BTW, are you a jew or part jew, John? If you are that would explain a lot. If you are not that would help me also in understanding your odd position.

Reply
John Engelman says:

August 6, 2015 at 19:10

Attributing Jewish wealth and power to anything other than Jewish intelligence is like blaming black poverty on white racism.

The races differ significantly in average ability levels. These differences result in different average incomes.

Reply
Pingback: Updates — Plain List - katana17katana17

Fred Reed – Not Naming the Jew

Opinions on

Fred Reed

Not Naming the … Jew

Contents

Introduction

I Solve a Mystery for

Fred Reed

Letters About Jews

In Search Of Conspiracy

Jared Taylor and Fred Reed

4 Responses to Jared Taylor and Fred Reed

Fred Reed and Me

“American Renaissance: Racists or Diagnosticians?”

Reading Reed

What Makes Freedy Run

Fred Reed and Me

Who Are These Jokers Kidding?

Letter to jew Gottfried

Fred Reed, Paul Gottfried and Me

Version History

Version History

6 Responses to Fred Reed – Not Naming the Jew

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

See All Posts List for more

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Other