Monika Schaefer: Greetings. Good day. Good evening.

Hello, everyone. It is August 17, 2024. You are tuned in to Republic Broadcasting Network, and this is your host, Monika Schaefer. And it’s episode eight of The Flipside with Monika. And before I introduce my guest I’ll just give you the numbers for calling in after the bottom of the hour, which we’ll invite people to do so after the bottom of the hour. 512-248-8252 or 1800 313 9443.

Okay, so today I’m going to have my brother Alfred on for the second time on this show, and I’m just reading the note here. Okay, so, great! So, Alfred, are you there? Can you hear me?

Alfred Schaefer: Yeah, Monika. And thanks for inviting me back on. There’s so much happening. Things are moving so fast. I’m glad we’re having this conversation again.

Monika Schaefer: Okay. [chuckling] Yeah, I know. Last time we talked about some good stories that you had that you related to current events, which was really, really cool! The ice skating story and sailing story. And this time, we’re again, going to cover some topics that we don’t generally talk about when we’re invited onto other folks talk shows and videos and etcetera. But since we are brother and sister team here and we grew up together and have a lot of history behind us, we can talk about these things.

And this is a topic that we’ve discussed quite often, and that is the topic of our, perhaps you could call it “rebelliousness”, in our youth. I think that we were not alone in being somewhat rebellious. You were in particular, you were the rebel of the family. I have to say, [chuckling] of the five kids, you were the most rebellious! And just some of the influences that were in our lives and some of the things that we really bumped heads with our parents on some of the topics. I know I had some big arguments with dad about some big topics that now I see that he was right on.

And, yeah, so let’s get into it. We discussed a few specific items, and we could talk about were these things just organic, or were they synthetic? You know, were these influences put upon us? And we just had no idea. We were in our, you know, teenage years. And beyond and just thought:

“Wow, this is just the way it is. You know, we rebel [chuckling] against our parents!”

Alfred Schaefer: So, yeah, you know, can I say a few words? Much of the rebellion, we now realize so many years later, they were basically engineered by the (((eternal destroyer))) by making those things that our parents thought were the most normal, whether it was dress code, whether it was our style of hair, whatever it was, mocking it, making it, like, ridiculing it.

It’s right in line with the attempts, just more recently, of the slogans in German, it would be Oma, Oma Umweltschwein [sp], which was a slogan from the Fridays for a Future kind of movement, which tried to drive a wedge between the young people like the teenagers and younger and so forth, against their parents by calling their grandmothers absolute environmental pigs kind of thing. Environmental destroyers, Oma, Oma Umweltschwein!

Monika Schaefer: That’s a good one, Alfred. I didn’t actually hear about that. Yeah, an environmental pig.

So the grandma is using up all the resources. So grandma is bad. Well. So oh, my goodness, that’s so interesting! So in our day, when we were young, I mean, probably the thing that I remember that our parents were just so unhappy about was the music we were listening to the pop, the rock and roll music. They, especially dad, he just absolutely could not stand it! And we bought records for each other at Christmas time and whatnot, and it was good old rock and roll, and we really liked it, and they did not like it!

And, I mean, the music that they were playing that we would hear on Sunday mornings kind of thing, it was either classical music or, I do remember, Bavarian folk music. A lot of that. I loved that. I just love that stuff. And the classical music, I have to say, it went right into my bloodstream. I loved that, too!

However, I didn’t fully realize how deeply my appreciation for that was nurtured until later. Until much later, actually. Then I realized, wow, this is really deep in my blood.

But anyway, why don’t you talk a little bit about the pop music? Because I know that you have had since done some research about that, and you even included some information about that in some of your very educational videos that you had posted. Go ahead.

Alfred Schaefer: Yeah, what we were listening to back then, well, I’ll just give you an example. The Beatles, for example. I remember how they were hyped up to be, oh, the mega stars!

And yet now we find out that now, if I listen to some of that old Beatles music, It’s finding obnoxious, actually, quite honestly, I don’t like it.

And at that time, though, we thought:

“Oh, if we didn’t like it, we’re supposed to like it.”

So we began to like it because that was hyped up as the passion. Everybody was listening to it.

So the entire type of music came out of the Frankfurt School, where, I don’t want to go into all the details of that, but the Beatles, it turns out, were basically an absolute artificial construct imposed on us by their handlers, if you will, like the Adorno kind of thing. And whether it was the lyrics, whether it was the music, whether it was the off note, like, there wasn’t real harmony in it. It was just like anybody who, in a natural environment and you heard their music, you’d probably run away, because it was, …

[08:33]

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, I mean, the Beatles was still very, very tame, I would say. And some of their music was actually very melodious, I thought, anyway. But I suppose I didn’t listen to all of it, or a lot of it, and that what I did here was pretty good.

But, you know what came later, and I’m not sure the timeline of this, if it did indeed come later, but the canyon, Laurel Canyon. I read a book not too long ago about Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon* and all the musicians that came through the canyon, Laurel Canyon, sort of a suburb of, I believe, Los Angeles area, and it was right by a military base, too, where they were doing I don’t know, some kind of secret intelligence type of stuff. I don’t remember all the details, but that was artificially constructed. All these musicians that went through there.

[* Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon: Laurel Canyon, Covert Ops & the Dark Heart of the Hippie Dream

https:// www.goodreads.com/book/show/18617616-weird-scenes-inside-the-canyon

David McGowan, Nick Bryant (Foreword)

Laurel Canyon in the 1960s and early 1970s was a magical place where a dizzying array of musical artists congregated to create much of the music that provided the soundtrack to those turbulent times. Members of bands like the Byrds, the Doors, Buffalo Springfield, the Monkees, the Beach Boys, the Turtles, the Eagles, the Flying Burrito Brothers, Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention, Steppenwolf, CSN, Three Dog Night and Love, along with other singer/songwriters as Joni Mitchell, Judy Collins, James Taylor and Carole King, lived together and jammed together in the bucolic community nestled in the Hollywood Hills.

But there was a dark side to that scene as well.

Many didn’t make it out alive, and many deaths remain shrouded in mystery to this day. Far more integrated into the scene than most would like to admit was a guy by the name of Charles Manson, along with his murderous entourage. Also floating about the periphery were various political operatives, up-and-coming politicians and intelligence personnel—the same sort of people who gave birth to many of the rock stars populating the canyon. And all the canyon’s colorful characters—rock stars, hippies, murderers and politicos—happily coexisted alongside a covert military installation.

Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon is the very strange, but nevertheless true story of the dark underbelly of a hippie utopia.]

I mean, the influences the drugs and rock and roll and free love and sex and all that stuff that came. I think the Beatles was the beginning of it, but it was relatively tame. I mean, they couldn’t start all at once with what then, you know, came a little bit later, I think. Anyway, that’s just my opinion.

Alfred Schaefer: Yes.

Monika Schaefer: I’m not an expert on this, but I just wanted to touch on that, because it’s something that caused a lot of strife in our home, the music.

I mean, I never forget. Dad was just disgusted by the music that we chose to listen to. So that was one aspect.

Then I want to move on to something that I had many arguments with dad about, and I think you had already left home. You’re older than me, so you had left home by this time. But it was just the beginnings of the “plea for tolerance”. That’s how it starts. The plea for tolerance for homosexuality. Okay. So I used to just think:

“Hmm, live and let live. Love and let love!”

That was kind of my own little slogan that I made up.

And I remember dad, he was really just so opposed to any kind of you know, tolerance for this new lifestyle that seemed to be pushed.

And I think a lot of the stories they brought in the mainstream media about gays being lynched and gays being, you know, hard done by this and that and happening to them, I think just like they lie to us today about events and things, they make things up. I bet you they made a lot of that up then, too, to make us feel sorry for these poor, oppressed people who just because they want to love somebody of their own sex, that others were beating them up or murdering them and whatnot. I don’t know. I’m just guessing, Alfred. But that’s something that I had arguments with dad about. Not that I had any tendencies towards homosexuality at all!

However, I just didn’t see the harm in it back then. But there are these five stages in this process.

The first is the plea for tolerance. Second is the plea for acceptance. The third is the plea for normalization. The fourth is the demand for compliance. And the fifth stage is total conquest!

I don’t know. Where do you think we’re at right now, Alfred, with this LGBTQ agenda?

Alfred Schaefer: Yeah, well, we are with the LBGTQ and XYZ agenda, the same as with all the other components of this vilific or I or rotting out, destroying our roots, our culture. And it is at this point where we have now learned and understood how this has been engineered into us. I like the five steps that you just mentioned. That’s very important to understand.

That’s how they do that with everything, whether it’s our accepting just everything, everything that’s gone wrong in our society now was imposed or was brought in slowly and then ramped up, increased until it was mandatory to accept that and comply with that you know, and if you have an entire population that doesn’t have any roots anymore because they’ve all been nibbled away and destroyed, then we are a mass of atomized individuals, not able to co-ordinate any kind of a resistance to our own subjugation. And that’s where we find ourselves now.

[13:39]

Monika Schaefer: And, yeah, I find that when they start out with the like you say, it applies to many, many aspects of their demoralization of our people. And it’s a full spectrum warfare. But they always start out with, you could say, “nice packaging”. Nice packaging. The packaging sounds really good. So at that time, the packaging would have been:

“Hey, you know, they’re not harming anybody and they’re being discriminated against. They’re being oppressed. They’re not just being discriminated against, they’re being beat up! You know, they’re being treated badly. And we don’t want to be like that! We’re not meanies. We’re nice people, so we should just tolerate them.”

And so the packaging is nice. Same thing with the packaging for the feminist agenda. It’s very nice packaging. It sounds good. Like, yeah, equal opportunities for equal work or whatever, and we’re all equal. Equal! Equal! You know, this sounds reasonable, doesn’t it? Like, I mean, me as a woman, I thought:

“Well, that sounds okay.”

But not understanding, until more recently what actually the feminist agenda is. And it’s just a completely disruptive and destructive agenda! And it pits men and women against each other, rather than the natural order in which we complement each other.

And also the fact that we are very different from one another. That is just a natural and biological fact. But the packaging is always good.

And, I mean, that makes me think of the packaging of the Green Party, and I call it the “Watermelon Party”. It’s all green on the outside, but red on the inside. Very Communist Party. But, gee, I got totally sucked in by the Green Party. It sounded so good!

Alfred Schaefer: Let me just add a few words there, Monika. Is that a big part of them imposing this agenda on us is by packaging this deviant behavior, if you will, like, for a man to put his penis into another man’s rectum is not normal, actually. Even if throughout history, there’s always been deviants who have done that, but it’s not actually called normal behavior.

And yet they make us believe through the propaganda that this deviant behavior is that if we attack it or vilify it or impose sanctions on it is as if you impose sanctions on someone who has, let’s say, a broken arm or something, or is down with a flu or something like that. Or they try to package it and make us look like we’re meanies, like we’re just meanies!

Monika Schaefer: Yeah!

Alfred Schaefer: But it’s not the case. They make it impossible for us to have guidelines for proper behavior because there’s no such thing anymore as proper behavior. You can do anything you want. And beware he who tries to stop anybody from behaving any way they want. This is where we are today. That’s why we have the crumbling of our civilization as we see before our eyes now, is because we have lost our direction. We have lost our guidelines, our rules, our structure in which we used to live as a civilized state.

Monika Schaefer: Excellent point. Excellent points. Like we’ve lost our moral compass. There is no moral compass. It’s just all over the place. Anything goes!

And back to bringing it back home to dad. I mean, he was a practical man in the sense that he told us about how dreadfully unhealthy the homosexual behavior was. Like we’re talking physical health. We’re not just talking the mental deviance of it and the sickness of it, because really, you can call it a mental illness. Instead, in their propaganda, they called us sick or mentally ill. Those of us who don’t like this or don’t think that it should exist. If we’re saying that they are mentally ill. No, they’re reversing it and calling us mentally ill for doing that!

But no, he talked about the actual diseases that would happen because of this very abnormal, unhealthy behavior of putting the penis where it should never go. I mean, really, that is disgusting and sick!

So anyway, let’s get on to the next subject. And you touched on it a few minutes ago, and just “hair”. I mean, oh my goodness, did we ever have battles in our home about the boy’s hair? You and our other brother.

And at that time, when you were in high school, that was in the seventies, mid seventies, there were no men that even had their ears showing. Even men in business suits, you know, who were bankers or whatever at that time. It was just generally that the men’s hair was longer. But the guys in school, like you guys, I mean, you were wearing your hair way longer, like down below the neck or whatever. At least our other brother was, anyway. But tell us about your little adventure there. [chuckling]

Alfred Schaefer: Yeah, I remember. Okay. We used to, as you know, when I was a little boy there kind of thing, you know, grade two, three, four and so forth. My mom, of course, would give us the hair cut as German boys would have their hair done all the time in Germany.

And that was basically fairly short all around the ears. And then up on top you’d have a bit of longer hair, but all nice and quite short. And this, the term or the mocking that was introduced to make that absolutely impossible for a young boy to wear was:

“A bowl cut! Ha ha ha! He’s got a bowl cut!”

So a bowl cut was mocking the typical German hairstyle. And nowadays, of course, you see it a lot now when people are waking up now, they’re carrying bowl cuts which were mocked back in those days.

And another club or hammer that they used to have us to leave behind our traditional haircuts was the Beatles with the Beatle look. I don’t know what they, there was a name for the way they wore their hair, but that was a huge propaganda effort and succeeded very well to make the Beatles cut, where they all had their big mane of hair kind of thing. And that was a big effort there to get us completely going in a different direction. That would detach us from whatever our parents generation considered normal and that they were used to that was a big, major driving a major wedge into that part of our behavior, basically.

[21:20]

Monika Schaefer: And it is. It’s sort of this generational divide, right? I mean, it sounds innocent enough. The length or shortness of your hair is not going to affect you in any kind of a biological way, or a health way or anything like that. But it was a big battle. It was just, it was a huge battle.

Now, nowadays, I don’t think the young people would really be able to have an understanding for what a big issue it was back then, because now anything goes as far as hair. You could have it shaved, you could have it long, you could have it short, like a nice cut, you could do anything now, and it’s, it doesn’t matter. But back then it was very, ah! It was just so, how would you say, just uniform, like everybody kind of was driven in one direction to have their hair a certain way.

Now, I want to tell a little story, if you don’t mind, Alfred, about what you did when you were, I think it was grade eleven. You were, I think, grade eleven age, [chuckling] and you came home one day and you said:

“Okay, mom, yeah, give me haircut!”

You’re sort of submitting, right? You’re going to get the short haircut.

Actually, you said to her:

“Shave it off!”

Well, mom refused to shave it off. She wasn’t going to do that to her boy. She was going to give you good haircuts. So she cut it short. But then you handed the shaver thing to our sister and said:

“Okay, you do the rest of it. You just shave it off!”

So she did. [chuckling] And this was at a time, like I say, you didn’t see men’s ears showing, even the guys in suits and ties. And it was just so shocking that the next morning when I woke up after a night’s sleep, I honestly had to go running to your bedroom to check if it was just a dream that I had had, because that’s how shocking it was. [chuckling] And so surprising. Like, you did nothing, see boys or men that had just shaved their head off. I mean, unless they were old men that were bald or something. [chuckling]

So you did that. It was kind of an act of rebellion. Funny that, eh, Alfred? That you were a little bit rebellious, [chuckling] but anyway, do you want to talk about that?

Alfred Schaefer: Yeah. Now in hindsight, I can’t even remember what actually motivated me to do that. But, yeah, it was just general rebellion. I guess it was getting fed up with just, …

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. The timing of that was very close to the timing of something else that happened. And when this happened to young people, it was kind of a bad stain because you’d have a record. But you got caught, you got busted with a little bit of marijuana, you and a bunch of other people in a van, and then you got held, you got thrown into jail, and dad had been out of town, and then he got home, had not yet seen you with your shaved head.

And I think you also picked up a big, long, black trench coat from the salvation army place, and he had to go get you out, like on bail or something.

Alfred Schaefer: Yes, correct.

Monika Schaefer: He had to go get you out of jail. And this must have nearly given him a heart attack! There he goes to get his son, who’s newly shaven, in a long, black trench coat, out of jail!

I mean, this was just the most shocking thing for our poor parents, who had to go through a lot with our rebellious years. Particularly yours! [chuckling]

Alfred Schaefer: Yeah. For our parents, our rebellious behavior was absolutely a shock! How could it be? Why are they misbehaving this way? And I guess I was the worst of the of us kind of thing at that point. It’s a little bit like if the parents nowadays, before they get shocked, what their kids do, I don’t know if anything can shock them anymore because of the depraved way our society has become.

Monika Schaefer: Well, I would say that the biggest shock now for parents, or let me turn that around. I think that when the young people come to their parents with their lover, their partner, who they want to be with, the parents are deeply, deeply relieved if it is a partner of the opposite sex.

So I think these days, the big shock comes for parents, perhaps. I’m thinking it would be. The big shock would be if your child is going to have a either a homosexual relationship or worse than that, tell the parents:

“Well, I’ve just cut off my penis or I’m going to switch into the other sex because I don’t. I was born in the wrong body!”

Probably that’s the perhaps nowadays, which is infinitely worse. Right?

[26:28]

Alfred Schaefer: There are people nowadays, Monika, they really try to drive the children into taking that route, a sex change through hormonal intake and even surgical move. And then they actually have gone so far as to pressure or even sanction parents who interfere with that.

And yet it turns out that all these people who have the children who do that, most of them commit suicide not long after because it’s not normal for children at a certain age when they get into puberty, they get rebellious, they want to do this or that, different than, you know what is customary.

But when children are allowed to opt out for a sex change, you might as well give them a pistol and they can shoot themselves in the head. That is a permanent, it’s death for them in the end, because whatever is driving them to go there, nothing of that is resolved.

And then they think:

“Oh, if little girl thinks, if I’m a boy, they can design me a little penis there or something, everything’s going to be good!”

Nothing’s going to be good afterwards. The problems are going to be so much worse afterwards. It’s not something they can just sort of get out of this age of getting into puberty and then everything is good again. If they do a measure like that, or a boy cuts off his penis, well, he might as well go and commit suicide. This is the level that we have come to in this “everything’s okay” because nothing is okay at the point where we find ourselves today.

Monika Schaefer: Absolutely! Like those things now that the children, well, might be upsetting the parents about are more permanent things. And I’d like to talk about who’s driving this. Do you think this is just natural and normal that kids rebel against their parents generation? Do you think that’s just normal? I don’t think so.

Alfred Schaefer: It is all driven by this Frankfurt School, as they call it, you know how to subvert, how to clip the roots of the plant that you want to kill, how to chop, to nibble at the roots of the tree. As they say, a tree without roots, the slightest wind comes along and it falls over. This is what’s happened to our once great civilization. And we either re-grow our roots, we find our history, or we will be going down!

And we are now at a very, very critical point in this time.

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, that’s a very good analogy about the tree. If you cut the roots of a tree, in other words, you cut our ties to our ancestors, then you kill the tree.

And I do hear the music now.

And so we’ll see you after the break.

[29:36]

[music]

[29:44]

[ad]

[36:00]

[music]

[36:28]

Monika Schaefer: All right, I think I’ll bring us back in. I usually let the music go a little bit longer, but we just have so much to talk about. And, yeah, we had a good chat in the break here, and so I just wanted to carry on with that.

You know, we talked about the suicide rate of children who, after they’ve had their bodies mutilated, that they aren’t happy with that it’s interesting to note that we never hear about those suicides, but on the contrary, how do they get parents to go along with this sick agenda? Is they scare, they frighten the parents into saying that:

“Oh, if your child feels that your child has been born in the wrong body, they will commit suicide if you don’t go along with this agenda!”

You see? So that’s their tactics. They reverse everything.

Anyway and then, Alfred, you had mentioned during the break that I should bring up Laurel Canyon again.

One of the things we mentioned was that how many of the musicians there that were actually put together into bands were sons and daughters of military folks and military folks in high, high places like Jim Morrison of The Doors. He was the son of a very high ranking military guy. And there were many, many others. Yeah, why don’t you talk a little bit more about that?

Alfred Schaefer: There was a time when so many of our rock and roll heroes seemed to all die in, through overdose of drugs or something, or at age 27. And what was happening in the background, which we did not, where we were not aware of it at all at that time was people like Jim Morrison from The Doors. These people were basically at the beginning, I believe the story that I had read or understood was he didn’t consider himself a musician at all! And they said:

“Qu no, no! We’ll get you’ll be a star. Let us manage you. No problem!”

So, of course, a youngster at that age being promised to be able to use the finest studio equipment to practice, and somebody’s got a team going to make something out of him. Well, who’s not going to do it?

Of course the average guy will go along with it, of course. So then these guys like Jim Morrison did, you know, became a real star. I loved that. I loved The Doors back then.

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, me too.

Alfred Schaefer: And then they start to figure out what the agenda, or ever more of the agenda behind what has made them a hero. And they start asking questions, started thinking about it, and then they become dangerous for the system.

And he’s not the only one who was suddenly dead at age 27, a typical age kind of thing. And I would say that is because you get them at very young age, start making them the stars that they will then become, because you’re promoting them through all your Avenues and you’re giving them lots of drill and training at this thing, rock and roll music.

And then they start asking too many questions, and then they become dangerous. And at 27, I guess that’s the age when you do start asking more and more questions.

[40:09]

Monika Schaefer: Well, it did seem odd that, and I don’t remember at what age who died when, but I just remember thinking, geez, there’s so many of them that happen to die at 27.

And I don’t know if there was something sinister behind that or if, like you say, it just was a coincidence that that’s the age they were at. I don’t know.

But anyway, shall we take our first caller, Chance from West Virginia?

Chance: Hello, and Guten Arban to you, Schaefer kids!

Monika Schaefer: Guten Arban!

Chance: You know, I hope you don’t mind. You brought back some memories for me, too.

I was born in 1960, and I had the long hair then. And I listened to the rock music. Used to drive my poor daddy crazy in the late sixties and all through the seventies. Yeah, you know, another thing with the long hair, you’ll get a kick out of these stories. I’m about the age of you guys. I had really long hair as a teenager, and my daddy would say to me:

“Why don’t you get a haircut? You look like something straight out of Haight-Ashbury!”

Monika Schaefer: Out of where? Sorry.

Chance: Haight-Ashbury. San Francisco, during the hippie age.

Monika Schaefer: Okay.

Chance: Yeah, but my mama had more attacks. See, my sweet mama used to say this. That’s how my daddy handled it. He was from Eastern Europe. But my mama, my mama had more tact. [chuckling] She used to say:

“You’re so handsome. You would look so much better with a shorter haircut!”

That’s [chuckling] mama for you. That’s a mama for you! You brought back those memories because they all passed on. I was the only one with the long hair and a rock and roller. My baby brother, God rest his soul, he kept his hair short. And I was a rebel of the family. Yeah, but talking about the music now, I still like classic rock. I’ll be honest with you.

I was born in 60, but I also like all kinds of music. The only kinds of I could listen to every. I have a ridiculous music collection, all different genres. But the only thing I can’t understand is how White people, even people close to my age, can listen to that filthy hip hop that shouts rhymes and every other word is an F word. And I say to myself:

“Wow! Of all the different genres of music, I could detect talent, whether it’s vocal talent, instrumental talent. I don’t care what genre it is, whether its country rock, Motown, real reggae. But with this crap, I says, all it is is rhyming, shouting rhymed words, and every other word is a vulgarity!”

So how could people, especially White people, actually listen to this? And it shows me the degradation that White people have as a whole, have fell to.

Monika Schaefer: You’re so right. Yeah.

Chance: I’ll be honest with you, looking back now, my entire family has passed on and but now I find myself looking at the younger folks the way I guess my daddy looked at me in a way, but for different reasons. I says, wow! Because even though, all right, some of the rock music was a little loud, but it was my thing back then. You know, I even played guitar and stuff.

But now they would be totally shocked hearing this rap music where every other word is. I don’t even want to mention the words. I mean, I don’t have the keenest mouth around myself, but my God, what’s in this music is, … It’s every other word!

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, I agree, Chance. I mean, that the some of the rap, and it’s just basic screaming and a lot of very hateful stuff in there. [chuckling] It’s just like, pretty bad.

And I also have to say I still listen to some rock and roll. I enjoy it. I also very much appreciate the classical music and the folk music. Folk music is just like wonderful, traditional stuff.

Chance: I got such a huge music collection. I have everything. I have Motown. I have rock, country, real reggae. Back Bob Marley days and Peter Tosh and easy listening, Engelbert Humperdinck, Tom Jones. You know, I listen to everything., …

Monika Schaefer: So, Alfred, did you want to make a comment to anything that Chance was saying?

Alfred Schaefer: Yes. The rap music that chance is talking about, Doctor William Luther Pierce calls that the negro, basically destructive negro music.

But it’s not even native to the negroes. This is pure jewish imposed destruction where people can vent their hatred and primitive. It’s just primitive! It’s basically tearing everything apart.

Chance: It’s ghetto music, Alfred.

Alfred Schaefer: It’s ghetto music!

Chance: Yeah. Now, I moved here to West Virginia about 15 years ago from the New York metropolitan area. Okay? And I heard that up there. But when I came here, I was shocked to hear people play it on jukeboxes here, young people. And I says:

“Wow, I can’t believe!”

Not all, not as much. I mean, up in the New York area, you had the cars with the boomboxes. That was horrendous! You know, I don’t hear that here.

But when you go to a public place or something, you’ll hear young people, White people. And I says:

“Wow, I can understand this!”

It actually infected rural areas.

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

Chance: To make matters worse, people in their fifties, some of them listen to it, and I just can’t understand. I don’t know. Now, don’t get me wrong, but more than I would have imagined when I moved here to this state.

[46:41]

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, it is. Go ahead, Alfred.

Alfred Schaefer: The jews know the power of media over us, over driving us to believe certain things. And this type of music has been, through advertising and stories and lies and so forth, we have been led to believe that it is somehow “cool”, somehow “modern”. You know, these are the words that they use to get us to swing us in that direction, to drive us in that direction, away from what our true, what we actually think if we didn’t have these blaring messages of this is the way we’re supposed to be. So you get White people thinking somehow that:

“Oh, the negroes and their way of walking and talking and behaving is somehow cool, and we are somehow uncool!”

So they want to imitate that what is taking us down, driving us down.

Chance: Yes. Now, folks, two more very quick comments. I’ve noticed, it’s shocking how vulnerable Whites can be to fads and trends, without thinking, without using their mind.

Now, I remember the day in the late sixties, early seventies, when White and black people both liked Motown, everything was nice. Everybody appreciated it. And Motown was mostly black, but it was great music, right? Whites and blacks both liked it. And there was anti-war songs that were being sung by White rock bands, by soul groups, by R&B groups. You don’t hear any of that now. Now you just hear a music being ghettoized rather than bringing people together. I don’t see it bringing people together. I see it ghettoizing people.

Monika Schaefer: Very good point you make. I do believe that it is meant to do exactly that. What you’re saying, it atomizes us.

Now, Chance, we do have another caller on the line, so do you have any final, brief comments before we let you go?

Chance: No, that’s it. Gutenaben!

Monika Schaefer: Gutenaben, thank you so much for your call. Thank you for your input. Okay, could we have Misty from Kansas?

Misty: Hello.

Monika Schaefer: Hi, there. You’re on the air.

Misty: Hi. Loving you two together. This is a great show. And I just want to say that I appreciate the your views on the experience you experienced, where you were from.

But, I want to say. You know what I’m saying? I like hearing y’all’s history. It’s excellent! Truth. Powerful. Okay.

But going back to the transgender weirdness, I have a friend that has a granddaughter, and she’s six years old. Started her first day of school in the first grade, and all of a sudden, this baby girl comes home and says:

“I think I’m a boy.”

Monika Schaefer: Oh!

Misty: Oh, yes. Truth.

Monika Schaefer: Unbelievable! In grade one.

Misty: Yes, ma’am. Yes, ma’am. Here in the States. And the person told me about this. And they said:

“Well.”

I said:

“Well, you know what happened?”

Well, they decided to ground the little girl for a week. Ground her because, …

Monika Schaefer: Keep her out of school? Is that what you mean? Like, keep her out of school?

Misty: No, no. She was grounded because the parents decided that’s not acceptable behavior. So my question was, why is the baby being punished?

Monika Schaefer: Yeah

Misty: And why ain’t you going at the school? And apparently, the child would not say where she came up with this.

And what I’m saying, how they do now out here in the States. They will threaten you now, if you don’t go with the program, we’ll just take your kid.

Monika Schaefer: Yes. It’s happening in Canada, too. I hate to say it, but parents are being criminalized for going against this agenda, and it is just causing absolute havoc! And oftentimes, it’ll cause marriage break-ups because one parent will be supportive of the child, they say, you know, for the child to mutilate him or herself and the other parent is just totally against it! And they’ll criminalize that parent who is against it. And it just is causing havoc! And you just wonder, wow! How is this happening? I mean, is this just natural? Is this organic?

So what do you think?

Alfred Schaefer: Can I say something? Yeah. Thanks, Misty. That’s very important, what you have been, what you’re telling us, and that is happening all over the place. In a healthy society, a teacher in an institution that let’s something like that happen. The little six year old confused about the gender, that teacher, that the parents would go there and that teacher would be strung up on the next tree. Nobody would allow that to fly. That is absolutely! It is our obligation, our holy obligation to ensure the healthy conditioning or environment for our most vulnerable. And these are these little children. Every little child can be brought to believe or question:

“Oh, maybe I’m this? Maybe I’m that?”

And then for the authorities, so-called “authorities”, the authorities that should not be, to force us to let them do that is absolutely outrageous!

And I like your comment also that, well, why didn’t they go to the school and rectify the situation there instead of grounding the poor little girl? And they should have started telling the girl:

“No, you are a girl. And what makes you think otherwise? What is the problem?”

Yeah, that’s the approach that should have been taken. That needs to be taken. And I would be delighted to hear of incidents where people will go to the school and string up these people that are doing that. And forget about the fear mongering. This is what we have to start seeing now.

Misty: Amen. I agree 100%.

At the same time, I live in an area, and it doesn’t matter where you live, home-school those children! Get them out of it! Jesus! It’s not that hard.

[54:23]

Monika Schaefer: If that’s the biggest message we could put out in this entire hour, that would be it. Take them out of the schools.

Misty: [words unclear] planting gardens, whatever. They don’t need to be indoctrinated!

And at the same time, I look at the parent and I go:

“Why the heck are you going to keep this child, brand new baby, into this system when she comes home with this?”

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. So, Misty, I agree with you 100%. And the trouble is, we are just so trusting. And most people have no idea how quickly the school system has degraded.

And, I mean, there were already these influences in our youth which we talked about on this show today, and that was just the beginnings, you know, those were the beginnings. And that was very mild in comparison to what is going on now. And it’s this induced, well, you could say this division between the children and their parents. It’s the mutilation of the children. They do these things behind the parents backs. They get the children onto these hormone therapies behind the parents backs.

I mean, when the Covid came out, they vaccinated children behind the parents backs at a certain age, I think age twelve or something.

I’ll tell you something else. Since 2022, we have legislation here in Canada making conversion therapy illegal! Now I will just explain that. It is the opposite of what it sounds like. To me, that sounds like you’re making it illegal to let people convert children or to convert somebody. Convert somebody to the opposite sex. No, it’s the opposite!

So if you want to coach or counsel a child who comes home from school like the one you just described, and you want to coach that child and say:

“No, no, no, you are a girl and this is just something that’s been put into your head. Stop that nonsense!”

Then you are doing the crime! And this is now a crime in Canada to actually give counseling to a child to put them right again.

Misty: People better just, how about. [words unclear] Don’t you agree? I’m sorry. This is a touchy subject.

Monika Schaefer: We just have a minute left, so please make your comments quick because then I’ll have to close out the show. Okay.

Misty: Well, I just appreciate you all. Thank you very much.

Monika Schaefer: Thank you for calling and thank you for sharing that story. It was very, very important.

Something I do want to say to folks. Please do support Republic Broadcasting Network. You can go to the website if you’re not already on its Republicbroadcasting.org. There is the information there for how you can support them, support the sponsors. Now if you have the means, please do that if you don’t have the means, you can always share these programs, these shows. That is another way of supporting Republic Broadcasting Network. It’s very, very important because we get accused sometimes of just preaching to the choir. Well, let’s not just preach to the choir. Share these programs. If there’s something you liked in it and other shows, then that’s what you can do. And Alfred, thanks. Do you want to say a final word while the music is going?

Alfred Schaefer: Yeah. Thanks. And like Monika says, let’s all do our part for getting this right.

Monika Schaefer: All right.

Thank you so much for joining. It’s the middle of the night for you, and we’ll see you all next week.

Thank you very much. Bye bye.

[58:12]

[music]

[58:53]

[ad]

[59:59]

END

top

============================================

RBN Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/18/2024 = 0)

NO COMMENTS
No Comments Yet!
Let me tell You a sad story ! There are no comments yet, but you can be first one to comment this article.
Write a comment

==========================

See Also

top

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 03 with Paul Fromm – Jul 13, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 08 with Alfred Schaefer – Aug 17, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript