[Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov signs the Nazi-Soviet Non-aggression Pact while German Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop and Stalin look on. See: Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 17 – War with Poland]

 

Joel Davis: It is also why they had the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact*, because the idea was, well, if we take Poland and the Soviet Union takes the other half of Poland at the same time, not only does that maybe neutralise us from having to go to war with the Soviet Union immediately. I mean, Hitler always thought they would eventually go to war with the Soviet Union, but he wanted to delay it. So that would neutralise that, but also it would neutralise Britain, he thought, because it was like:

“Well, the British can’t declare war on us and the Soviet Union at the same time. That would be insane!”

 

And the British responded by just declaring war on Germany, and then not declaring war on the Soviet Union. Which, if that’s the whole reason why, apparently we have to go to war with Germany is because of poor Poland, then how come the Soviet Union is allowed to get away with it? That makes no sense.

 

[* The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, officially the Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and also known as the Hitler–Stalin Pact was a non-Aggression pact between Germany and the Soviet Union, with a secret protocol establishing Soviet and German spheres of influence across Northern Europe. The pact was signed in Moscow on 23 August 1939 by German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov. Wikipedia.]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

And then, of course, there was the Katyn Forest massacre. When the Germans ended up pushing into former Polish, now Soviet territory, they discovered that the communists had rounded up all the Polish officers and intellectuals and murdered them and tried to hide their bodies in Katyn Forest, because that’s what communists do when they take a country. They don’t want any sort of competition from the native intelligentsia.

 

And obviously, the Germans tried to expose that, but the Allied powers, the media, blamed it on the Germans and was only later revealed by the Red Cross that it was the communists that committed that massacre.

 

But what I was getting at is, despite not being that well read in Second World War, certainly not as much as Darryl Cooper or probably not either of you guys either, I would fall behind you guys, too. But after reading Mein Kampf and reading it so extensively, I had intuitive senses about what I expected the truth was in World War Two. And I’m amazed that everything that I sensed was right! With evidence and study, ends up becoming facts before my eyes. Do you guys have the same experience?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t know why. I guess, for me, I learnt about World War Two considerably before reading Mein Kampf. So it was kind of like the reverse in my personal trajectory. But this is so important and pivotal, though, because people have said to me:

 

“Oh, well, World War Two isn’t actually so important because a lot of the justification that the enemy gives for White replacement is because of colonialism and what we did to the Aboriginals and what happened to the Native Americans. And in America, also slavery and what happened to the blacks.”

 

And these kinds of narratives:

 

“And what the British Empire did and European empires did in general during the so-called ‘atrocities of colonialism’. And really, that’s more pivotal than the Nazi thing.”

 

I disagree with that for the basic reason why the pathologisation of National Socialist Germany and National Socialism is more important than the anti-colonial narratives, is because what they are pathologizing kind of is our future, not just our past.

 

[1:11:58]

 

 

Like when they talk about in America about how bad slavery was, that discussion isn’t being conducted under the pretext of that there’s a bunch of people that are going to re-institute mass nigger slavery in the United States. Or when they talk about the problems with colonialism, that debate isn’t being kind of conducted under the pretext that we’re going to start massacring all the Aboriginals tomorrow or something like that it’s like a historical crime that you want to apportion blame to a certain people for of something that happened way back in the past that doesn’t seem like it really is an imminent threat in any real way.

 

Whereas National Socialism has a certain imminent threat. The idea that, like, White people could redo something like that again in the future. And that as soon as White people start organising politically or taking their own side or saying just kind of being racially conscious and having a kind of racial view of politics, that somehow we’re on this kind of trajectory to Hitler and the Holocaust, and we got to shut it down! And this is scary! This is the most scary possible thing. It can never be allowed to ever happen again.

 

And so that’s the distinction. Like, colonialism doesn’t have a “never again” narrative. Slavery doesn’t have a “never again” narrative, but this does! And that explains also why it’s projected out onto non-Germans. Like, why are White Australians subjected to anti-Nazi demonisation narratives? We weren’t Nazis. Like, we technically fought against them. Well, it’s because it’s about the future, this idea that, like, White people in Australia could do a Hitler, or that White people in America could do a Hitler or whatever, even though they fought Hitler.

 

So that’s the real kind of crux of why this is the most significant narrative, I think, for the current ideological world order. Because it’s a pre-emptive block against anything akin to National Socialism ever existing at some point in the future.

 

And so it’s a future oriented mythos, not just simply, like, apportioning blame for some event that happened in the past. So that would be my primary argument.

 

But secondarily as well, the reason why it’s so integral is because of the specifically jewish aspect. Like, jews can’t use colonialism and slavery or whatever to defend themselves, because jews actually kind of helped with colonialism and with slavery, actually. And they weren’t really uniquely victims of any of these processes. And they’re doing colonialism in Israel right now and so on. So these narratives don’t actually help jews very much. They help jews in the sense that they can be used to attack us, but they don’t really protect jews.

 

The Holocaust myth and the anti-Nazi narrative, what it does is it basically protects jewish power, because they were the unique victims in this story, at least in the way that it’s presented. You know, even though the 6 million is obviously a total lie!

 

But obviously, some jews died in the Second World War, but also way more Europeans died in the Second World War. But that doesn’t apparently matter. Only jewish deaths matter, apparently.

 

But anyway, the jews have been able to kind of build the kind of mythos of the Second World War around them as the primary and central victim and make the story about themselves.

 

And so that then enables obviously, as we can see, like them to basically have a free pass to do what White people can’t do, organise collectively, have ethno-states do settler colonialism, occupy positions of power, and do so out of self interest. And:

 

“What’s your problem? You’re just jealous that jews are successful or whatever!”

 

Like arguments that White people can’t use apparently, under the current moral paradigm, jews are permitted to use.

 

And so that’s why it’s also so fundamental and integral, because when you bring down the World War Two narrative, you don’t just, basically protect White collectivism as a principle and re-legitimize White collectivism as a principle. You also de-legitimize jewish victimhood, and you break down the whole jewish victimology, that they used to protect themselves.

 

So it’s like a double pincer action on the two key things that basically perpetuate our current situation of subjection to a jewish empire that is genociding us.

 

Because I’ve seen a few people make those arguments. So I just wanted to kind of hit back against that, because it’s just wrong. Like, we are objectively correct that the World War Two narrative is the key, most sensitive aspect of the overall mythos of the current world order.

 

And you can see that through how ubiquitous it is. I don’t think they would be able to demonise White people for colonialism to the scale that they can, or a lot of these other kind of anti-White narratives that are perpetuated if they didn’t have that ability to call anyone who, any Whiteman who stands up against it a “Nazi”. And for that to have some kind of mystique, this pathological mystique, that being a Nazi would be a bad thing, and therefore, beliefs categorized as, quote, unquote, “Nazi”, therefore kind of treacherous and should be feared and avoided and repressed and all of this kind of thing.

 

So the whole the setting, the terms of the conversation is fundamentally done by the Second World War’s narration in the popular consciousness. And the jews have been disproven, that the gas chambers are fake. Like, they literally have been disproven that the gas chambers have been proven fake. And the jews had other lies that they perpetuated about that they made soap out of the victims and all this kind of ridiculous nonsense! And so many, quote, unquote, so-called “Holocaust survivors” that said that they were at Auschwitz have been proven that they weren’t actually there. Some of them weren’t even born yet that claimed to be there, or said that their parents died of in Auschwitz, but they were born, like, five years after the war ended or whatever. This has been countless, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s your Holocaust Industry!

 

Joel Davis: But because jews control the media, their lies have been able to still be perpetuated and seep into the public consciousness. So that the average person thinks the gas chambers were real, even though, like a more mainstream historian who isn’t even, like a Holocaust revisionist, will now start because of the work of the people pushing back, will now say that the Holocaust was fundamentally done not with gas chambers, but through, like, shooting the victims and so on. Because no one knows that. No one knows that because this is like an academic discourse that is being, like, conducted in some ethereal place that no one has access to.

 

And then anyone who tries to engage with it, for our perspective in Europe, gets thrown in jail and so on. The table has been set for this narrative in the popular consciousness where, like, it kind of requires, like, a mass popularisation of an alternative narrative to reverse that.

 

[1:19:11]

 

And so when people say to get back to that earlier point about:

 

“Well, Tucker Carlson, is he our guy or not?”

 

It’s kind of irrelevant. We should just basically fuel any chink in the armour of the Holocaust mythos and the World War Two mythos, we just got to lean into it and just drive into whatever chink is in the armour of the enemy, because it’s not about winning the argument in the abstract.

 

Like, David Irving is a best selling author. You know, the argument has already been won in the abstract. They had to criminalise the opposition because they had couldn’t win the argument. If you try and organise a debate between, like, a historian that says the Holocaust was real against a historian who says it was fake, you won’t almost will never be able to organise that debate because no historian who thinks it’s real actually has the balls to show up to a debate like that and get roasted in front of heaps of people and embarrassed and allow the narrative to get destroyed. The Holocaust myth is so weak, it can be destroyed with exposure.

 

 

[See: The World’s First Anti-Holocaust Convention — Instauration Dec, 1979]

 

So that’s why they have to ban, like, that’s why they have to regulate social media to prevent people from discussing it and so on and take all the videos off YouTube and all the rest of it, because that’s the only way to stop, like, a kind of mass delegitimisation of it in the popular consciousness and force, like, a shift.

 

So our strategy has to be just whatever fucking wins we can get on the board against the narrative is just to drive into it. Everyone has to just get on the same page and just shill hard whenever we get an opportunity to try and eventually, like, break through. Because once we break through, you know, it isn’t so much that, like, people believing that the Holocaust was real creates this, like, chain reaction in their mind that produces the whole anti-White worldview or something. But the kind of sense that the average person has that, like, of association of gas chambers and genocide and so on with White collectivism, Nazism, that whole kind of cloud of things that are all connected together. And then, therefore, like, not really thought about in a rational way. That has to be, like, brought out of that kind of haze into into actual conscious awareness and rational discourse in some way.

 

And so to me, that’s the key, because if you don’t have actual competent public discourse about this particular issue, then the ability of the enemy to just dismiss everything as:

 

“Well that’s a Nazi idea!”

 

And then they can just go:

 

“Next question.”

 

Just prevents that from ever happening. That’s just reinforcing the same kind of repressive tendencies. So I’m just kind of responding to that.

 

There’s people out there that have been saying, and have been saying for a long time, and I’ve had this argument many times, that:

 

“We shouldn’t be focusing on World War Two. We should just step over World War Two. Don’t talk about the Holocaust. Don’t talk about Hitler. Just try and avoid the subject and just talk about what’s happening to White people today in 2025 or 2024 or whatever, and just keep it current and talk about the problems with mass immigration today and the double standard of the Left on White issues or whatever, and just keep it current and keep it accessible. Because when you start going on about World War Two and about Hitler, then you start sounding like a lunatic, and it freaks people out, and it prevents people from having this discussion.”

 

And it’s like, no! No! Because the spectre of World War Two and Hitler is there! When you try to have that conversation about mass immigration or about White issues, even if you don’t want Hitler to be there, you don’t want World War Two to be there. It’s there! It’s there in the mind of literally everyone! Knows about this event. Everyone has a kind of sense of what the common normie position is on the subject, that it was the worst, most horrible thing ever that ever happened!

 

So that’s just the reality of the situation. So you actually have to then drag it out of repression and neutralise it, because otherwise it’s just going to be there and prevent the conversation from actually happening in a correct way. And I know pretty much no one in this movement who is racially conscious, White people, who aren’t also World War Two revisionists. I’ve never met one person who totally believes that the official story about the Second World War and then at the same time, has a White, identitarian political worldview.

 

[That was well stated by Joel. Any discussion on White Identity leads to criticism that it ends up with gas chambers and six million bars of soap – Kat]

 

[1:23:56]

 

Blair Cottrell: Who was the first person or what was the first experience you had which got you thinking about the Second World War from a different point of view? Was there someone that stands out?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I was always aware as for as long as I could remember, that that basically, bankers, like financial elites, have massive, disproportionate political power. Because it was just logical to me that, like, well, whoever has controls the money must control the government, and the media, and therefore society. And then I knew almost as long as I could remember that a lot of these people are jews, that I was just kind of aware of that. I don’t even remember exactly how I learnt that because it was just something that I just kind of realised from such a young age that I don’t remember. I don’t actually remember the formative, like, “aha” moment.

 

So because I knew those, I understood those two facts, and I knew that those people were the enemies of Hitler. And I was like:

 

“Well, the world is kind of fucked up! The people that are in charge don’t seem to be good guys. They seem to be malicious. They seem to be nefarious. And I knew Hitler was their enemy.”

 

So even though I thought the Holocaust was probably real and or whatever, I also understood, I think as long as I could remember that, like:

 

“Well, there’s actually more to this than how it’s being presented.”

 

And therefore, there was always an attraction that I had towards Adolf Hitler and the swastika and the Nazi uniforms, aesthetically, and the Germans, because I had this sense of:

 

“Well, those were the last people to really take on who is in control. And the people that are in control are kind of fucked up! So maybe there was something good about them.”

 

But then, at the same time, that was a very scary thought to follow through to its ultimate conclusion.

 

And so the way that I dealt with that as a teenager was through irony and constantly making jokes about the Holocaust and jews and Hitler and so on. And it was just a kind of ironic affection for the Nazis that:

 

“Oh, no! I’m not Nazi. I’m just joking!”

 

But I always kind of had that sense when I was a teenager.

 

And so when I was around 18 or 19, and I started coming across Holocaust revisionist YouTube videos, which I found on the YouTube algorithm, because I was into, 9/11 conspiracy theory content and stuff like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Loose Change.

 

Joel Davis: And the 9/11 conspiracy theory content was you know, the best stuff that was out there would blame Zionists and Israel. So that then when you start watching that kind of anti-semitic 9/11 conspiracy theory stuff, it’s a hop, skip, and a jump to the Holocaust conspiracy stuff in those days, because the Internet was a lot more free back then. So I ended up finding my way into the Holocaust revisionist stuff around that time. And I was like:

 

“Okay, this actually makes a lot of sense.”

 

I mean, I was already basically totally open minded to it. So I didn’t really put up much resistance to it. Like, as soon as I came across it I wanted to believe that it was true. Like, immediately! Like, I didn’t really put up any resistance. I was like:

 

“Yes, the Holocaust was fake!”

 

Not only is that a kind of the more fun thing to believe in, but it also felt empowering. So, yeah, as soon as I kind of got the opportunity to be, like, hooked by Nazi propaganda, I just jumped into the water, like, you know what I mean? Because I was already attracted. I was already kind of sold before I even started.

 

So there isn’t really some formative moment where this is where I, like, cross the Rubicon or something, because I didn’t really have very much resistance to it the whole time.

 

And I’ve always been an “edge lord” and someone who likes going against consensus and going against the grain. And obviously, I could tell that being a Nazi would be the kind of political position that would piss the most amount of people off, particularly people that I wanted to piss off!

 

So it was very attractive. Like, it was very easy. So, yeah, I don’t really have a very good, like:

 

“Oh, so, like, I used to be like this and then I saw this, and then I became this.”

 

In my kind of trajectory, unfortunately.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I didn’t expect you would have. I just thought there might be an outstanding memory or someone that you associated with that just said something to you once that got you started. What about you, Sewell? Have you got a memory like that?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I can think of lots of little moments. I mean, one of the main ones was, I was in the gym and for some reason I was scrolling Facebook at the time because I was allowed to have it. And I had the Australian War Memorial on Facebook. And on that, they would post a photo of an Anzac soldier every day. You know, it was just in the feed and it was just a nice page to follow on Facebook. And that day specifically, they didn’t put up a photo of an Australian soldier. They put up a photo of a jew getting executed in. Into a ditch by a Nazi. And it was like:

 

“Never forget the six guerrillion! Da da da da da!”

 

[An alleged picture from an Einsatzgruppen soldier’s personal album, labeled on the back as “Last Jew of Vinnitsa”. It shows a member of Einsatzgruppe D just about to shoot a jewish man (? partisan) kneeling before a filled grave in Vinnitsa, Ukraine, in 1941.]

 

[1:29:47]

 

It was this big “Holocaust” hoax thing. Probably just before 2013 or really early 2013. It was before I watched the documentary Greatest Story Never Told and before I read Mein Kampf. And it was just before, it was right on the precipice of it. And I was racially aware, certainly. And I knew the jews did 9/11. And so I hadn’t connected all the dots or still connecting all the dots. And a big “aha” moment that I had was I saw this photo, and I thought to myself, just in that moment, I was like:

 

“Really? What’s this doing on Australian War Memorial? These aren’t Australians. What’s this got to do with Australian War Memorial? Why are they always shoving this Holocaust thing down our throat?”

 

And I’d never, ever in my own mind questioned the Holocaust. I just assumed it as a fact. I studied normie World War Two history in high school, and I assumed it as a fact.

 

And then I was like:

 

“I want to know about this photo. There’s got to be some reason for this photo. There’s no way that they were just killing people willy nilly for no reason, just because they were jewish.”

 

That seemed absurd to me at the time. And, just normal soldiers.

 

And so I Googled the origin of the photo and where it was taken and who the unit was and who they were executing. And guess what? Guess what? It turned out it was an anti-partisan squad had tracked down some jewish partisans that had, you know, cut the testicles and the penises off prisoners of war and had done all these heinous war crimes. And a special unit of German soldiers [Einsatzgruppe] had tracked these fuckers down and shot them in the back of the head, and said:

 

“Good night, bye bye. You’re not doing that anymore!”

 

Because these jews were committing a war crime by fighting as partisans. Fighting in civilian clothes was a war crime, and it was punishable by death. And the normal process when they caught these fuckers was to just kill them, was to just summary execution. And that that was the punishment for doing that stuff. So they were actually abiding by the law.

 

And obviously war is dirty, and war is ugly, and war is never perfect. And obviously there were killings on both sides that were improper. But that one specific photo was a justified killing!

 

And I was in the army at the time. We were studying at the time to fight the Taliban. And we were studying the Taliban, all this Ben Roberts Smith war crimes stuff. All this stuff is all connected. We were studying how to fight partisan forces, but we didn’t call them “partisan”. It wasn’t an Einsatzgruppe. It was “Counter Insurgency”. We were studying counter insurgency. But counter insurgency doctrine was built off German counter partisan doctrine. It was built off the SS doctrine.

 

So the stuff I was studying when I was in the army was identical doctrinally to the stuff the Germans had developed in World War Two to fight the jews. And that, for me, was like:

 

“Wait a minute. What else about the Holocaust isn’t real? Like, are the Germans the bad guys?”

 

Like, I never thought the Germans were the bad guys. And now I’ve just uncovered one little lie here and within six months, I was like, it seems like it took a long time, but these things all happen like a synchronicity all at once. It was like I just getting constantly bombarded and hit by these little streams of consciousness and information. It was a spiritual revolution in my own mind, in my opinion. It was awakening, a true awakening!

 

And, yeah, that’s why I can’t harp on about it enough how important it is for you to wake up people around you and proselytize. I mean, anyone that knows me back then, when I was 20 years old, would know that every single house party I went to, I’d have about three or four beers, and then I would just talk about Hitler nonstop! And I would talk about World War Two nonstop! And I’ll talk about the Holocaust nonstop! And I’ll talk about Ernst Zundel and David Irving. And why?:

 

“You know what Zyklon B is?”

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you have a little, like, did you have little possies form around you and just listen to you intently?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I had that.

 

Thomas Sewell: There would be these other bros that would just huddle around and be like:

 

“Really, dude! What the hell? I didn’t know that!”

 

Blair Cottrell: And there was always one. There was always one kind of queer guy that would get mad at you, but he didn’t have the courage to say anything, but you could just kind of sense it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, there’s always one passive aggressive faggot that would just walk off, because they were probably jewish or they were, …

 

Blair Cottrell: And go sit with the girls and try to curry favour with them, but then realises several years later he’s actually gay. [chuckling]

 

[1:34:12]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, look, I had a lot of really funny experiences, and I still do it to this day. I mean, all the guys at work, they all know all the stuff now, and they just love it! I get to work. I was on a different site this morning doing something else, and then I went to the main site, where all the boys were trying to hold down some roof sheets in the wind down at Safety Beach, which I’m sure you’re familiar with that area, Mr Cottrell. Yeah, it was interesting. As I got there, it was like, they’re all talking shit about me because, you know how, like, when you rock up somewhere, someone’s like:

 

“Oh, hey, how’s it going?”

 

But then when you rock up there and they’re like:

 

“Hey!”

 

Like, you know, that they are all faggots! But like, as soon as I got there, they were like:

 

“Oh, look, the gay jew is here! Oh, look! Oh, Hitler!”

 

You know just straight away they were into it. And normally, like, they wait a bit of time. But it was a Friday, everyone’s in a good mood. And we were knocking off early because the wind was pretty bad. But yeah, it was good. It’s good. Like, just everywhere I go, I Hitler post, I just prophetize.

 

And I was at the shops the other day, and I was just wearing my Hitler shirt the other day. And, yeah, Jimbo actually gave me T-shirt when he had that argument with Runic Storm. He was like:

 

“I’m getting rid of all my Runic Storm stuff!”

 

[Blair laughing] He gave me a Hitler shirt and I was like:

 

“I like the T-shirt. This is a nice shirt.”

 

I wear it out most of the time. I wore it out on Father’s Day, actually, which I thought was spiritually important. Odin.

 

Anyway, I won’t, I digress. Oh, sorry. I had a note before we got off topic a little bit. But you were talking about. It was a really interesting point, and I was keen to expand on it. You talked about Tucker Carlson’s form of conservatism, still relying on the enemy’s talking points, like egalitarianism. And trying to make the argument that egalitarianism is a weapon used against Whites.

 

Blair Cottrell: Just to be fair. To be fair, it wasn’t necessarily egalitarianism per se, but just phrases such as:

 

“Everyone has the rights to safety and everyone has the rights to live in freedom and blah, blah, blah.”

 

And that’s only one step away from saying:

 

“Everyone has the right to come here too, and live here with us.”

 

Joel Davis: He was doing like, the Happy Homelands chungus of like:

 

“Oh, every people, group has a right to have their own communities and they’re in a country that can preserve their culture.”

 

He was kind of going for that.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t like that. I don’t like that because I don’t believe every people have that right. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s quite a complicated issue. But it’s interesting, I didn’t bring it up because I agree with him. I brought up because it’s interesting that he’s trying to dismantle egalitarianism by saying:

 

“Well, what happens when one group’s egalitarianism clashes with another group egalitarianism?”

 

I think that’s interesting because the Left will complain that, … Because usually conservatives are pretty shit, they’re pretty stupid, their talking points are boring and wrong, and they’re like:

 

“No, the Left are the real racist!”

 

But this is an example where he’s not necessarily saying that the Left aren’t the real egalitarians in that kind of boring, overused way. What it sounds like he’s saying is:

 

“What happens when one group’s rights ultimately clash with another group’s rights?”

 

And now we’re getting to the fact that politics is a zero sum game. What happens when the rights of refugees to exist anywhere in the world that they want clash with the rights of a homogenous population that wants to retain their culture and identity?

 

And so although that’s not obviously the Avenue we go down to push White nationalism, it’s interesting to see perhaps the conservatives could be going down this path of pushing White nationalism from that it’s a clash of two different groups, rights. And I do believe we have a right to safety. I do believe that we have a right to these things. I just have a different understanding of rights. I believe that rights are developed by the barrel of the gun.

 

Blair Cottrell: And you believe we can summon the force to establish that right!

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly! Exactly! I believe the rite is the RITE I know that sounds a bit cliche, like lore, LORE, not LAW, and rite, RITE. But the rite is the rite, the ritual, and the ritual is power. And when you have men in service, in duty, men with an honour concept, and you build an honour society, when you build a nation, well, a nation is already built. It’s a people. But when you build a state, when you have a statecraft that improves the nation to the capacity that men pass through rituals, through rites, in order to assert their masculine will on everything, then what you have is safe borders.

 

Then you have the right to exist. Because you can assert that right, you have a triumph of the of the masculine will, to say:

 

“Well, this is our fucking territory!”

 

And that is an inherently masculine concept. Women think about nationalism I think from a very different angle. They don’t necessarily think like, it’s hard for women to be nationalists in the kind of political, philosophical way that we are. Not that they can’t, but it’s just hard for them because they obviously think about like, White women deserve safety. You know, they don’t want to go to the shops and all the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Immediate concerns such as, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: Household security, children, safety, that kind of thing.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, yes.

 

Whereas as a man, obviously we’re concerned with these things. But even if that was safe, even if I had that and it was safe, I still wouldn’t be satisfied, because it’s not:

 

“Oh, I’m okay. Fuck everyone else!”

 

I’m nationally minded. I’m racially minded. I’m considering things on a larger level.

 

And I do think that that is a spectrum of within the Right-wing or within the pro-White scene. There’s a lot of pro-Whites that think that White flight is the solution. They’re pro-Whites. They know Hitler did the right thing, but they think the solution is just White flight, or just have White children. And obviously, I mean, I’m having White children. I mean, a lot of people in the movement are having as many White children as we can, but there’s already millions of White children. That’s not the reason why we’re in a better position than we were ten years ago, or a worse position. It’s not necessarily about how many White children we have.

 

That’s having White children isn’t going to solve the problem. It’s only going to prolonge the conditions for us to then solve the problem. We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children. We must secure, to me the 14 words, it explains it in it:

 

“We must secure the existence of our people!”

 

Secure, as a word implies that there’s an anxiety, a national anxiety. Women are anxious. That’s why they’re not having enough children. But we are nationally anxious! There’s a national anxiety about the state of the folk, of the nation!

 

[1:40:48]

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah. Actually, Darryl Cooper described it as:

 

“The sensation of being pulled in multiple directions by ambivalent forces and that everyone feels that.”

 

I thought that was a good way to phrase it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yep. Mason calls it “alienation and isolation”.

 

Joel Davis: My view on this is I don’t actually want to have White children. I want to have Aryan children! And what an Aryan is a member of the honourable race. That’s what Aryan is derived from etymologically, like “arya”, which means honourable or noble.

 

And right now you can have a White child, but you can’t really have an Aryan child because we are dishonoured. We’re in a state of perpetual dishonour because we are subjugated. We are not truly free! We are not truly and also the word free is something that’s interesting to analyze by etymology because if you trace it back to the Indo-Aryan, sorry, the Indo-European root language, the word “free” and the word “love” actually come from the same root, “pri”, which is related to “prior”, which is like a Hindu goddess, and therefore “Freyr”, which is the Germanic goddess of love. So freedom and love actually, because “free” kind of sounds like Freyr, or whatever, as well.

 

So they all actually come from the same root. And so what it means to be “free” is to be in a beloved community, to be surrounded by people who love you. And that’s what ultimately a society composed of honour is. It’s a society where people do things for one another out of love, out of out of freedom. They serve each other freely. They aren’t compelled to through being enslaved and being subordinated to some kind of tyrannical or oppressive order that forces them to serve one another.

 

To have a truly free society is to have a society where basically everyone is working together for mutual benefit, organically, purely. And that is what an Aryan society under Aryan rule would be like. Where you have such a society of such healthy blood, that has such strong solidarity and community that everyone is kind of naturally living for the race and their own betterment and the race’s benefit in a totally natural and, basically un-coerced way, ultimately. Once you remove all the kind of nefarious elements, once you get rid of all the communists and the jews and the bankers and so on, and you have a correctly ordered society, then you’re in the community of love, you’re in the beloved community and you are truly free!

 

And that’s what I want for my children to be. To live a life of maximum dignity in a society that loves them. That is what’s going to give them freedom and true honour.

 

And to me, a right only exists if you’re willing to fucking die for it. That’s the only way to guarantee that it exists. Because you either choose that either my rights will be honoured, or I’ll be dead. You know, the it was considered shameful in many Aryan societies, to be taken prisoner in war. You would commit suicide before being taken prisoner. Because being taken prisoner or being enslaved, that’s dishonour! No, you go to battle, you either win or you fucking die! That’s it! That’s what the honourable man does.

 

And that basic concept when I’m thinking about on the question of bringing it back to the World War Two revisionist thing, people say:

 

“Oh, Joel, you’re going to alienate normal White people by talking about Hitler!”

 

And they say they saw all three of us, but [chuckling] particularly Tom:

 

“You’re going to alienate normal White people!”

 

They’ll be with you when you’re talking about immigrants. They’ll be with you when you talk about a lot of White issues, trannies, whatever:

 

“But why do you got to talk on about the Hitler stuff? Why do you need the swastikas? Why do you need all of that baggage? You just you’re just taking yourself out of the conversation by doing that and freaking people out!”

 

And it’s like, but no! We are going to honour Adolf Hitler. He is literally the greatest man of the modern world! And he raised the greatest resistance against the forces which are subjugating us, of anyone!

 

And so there is no fucking way that we’re not going to honour him! I would rather die than dishonour our great ancestors, the great men of our race. What’s the point then? We can never be Aryan. We can just be White! We can just have this negotiated, conservative social order that gives a few concessions to White people, but ultimately we’re still subjugated. We don’t have the true freedom to truly be ourselves and venerate the men that need to be venerated for a society to be ordered according to the correct principles.

 

If we have a society that is actually built around what is in our people’s interest and what is good for our people and what is noble in our people and our people’s nobility, that would be a society that has statues of Hitler everywhere. That’s the society that we would live in. Like, if we win, there’ll be statues all across the Western world and hopefully even beyond, of Hitler! Fucking everywhere! It’ll be ubiquitous because so many people will think:

 

“Fuck! Would be so cool to put a Hitler statue here!”

 

And there’ll be, like, government funding and so on, because we will venerate, we will teach the children in school what a great man he was and so on, because it’ll become part of the new mythos of the new social paradigm and political paradigm that is created.

 

And so I’m already there in that world. And I’m kind of like, I’ve time travelled back to you guys, and I’m going to start on, like, that’s kind of part of what we’re about here is we’re going to start kind of communicating that world to you now. Because that’s the only way in which it will actually come into existence is if we demand it, if we’re willing to fight for it.

 

So to me, it’s not negotiable that we honour Hitler, that we honour the swastika, which is an ancient symbol of our people, and so on, these basic principles, because ultimately, that is essential to us having dignity in ourselves. Like, otherwise we’re cucked! Like, if we have to surrender those things, then we’ve already lost. We have already basically conceded that we can’t win.

 

[1:47:38]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: One more thing I wanted to bring up that was really well said, by the way, Joel, you’re in fine form tonight. That brain sticking over. I don’t know, it’s like you’ve got an extra generator attached to your mind tonight. Love it!

 

But at one point during the Tucker Carlson interview, Cooper said that:

 

“Trying to create or forge a nation state to include, quote, unquote, ‘all White people’ or ‘all of Europe’ was already inclusive and challenging enough, and that we haven’t even managed to really do that successfully for any great length of time before. We were also forced to take or try to assimilate into our national identity, all of these other races.”

 

And I thought that was a really profound statement. And he said:

 

“The closest we got as a race or as a collective White group was in America in the fifties.”

 

He also said that he doesn’t believe right now people are equipped to question their understanding of the Second World War. But he says in about 20 years, he expects they will be. Why do you think that is? What’s going to change from now, in 20 years time?

 

I think we’re in like a yeah, … But before I finish, I tend to think we’re in a bit of an unstable situation, because think about it. If X disappears, what have we got? Telegram. And if Telegram goes, what have we got? We don’t have means of communication other than our physical communities, which are still in their infancy.

 

So, yeah, it’s like we’re still, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Tucker and Elon, the system’s losing a lot with Tucker and Elon being against them, clearly against them, clearly antagonizing them. But is the system prepared to go to that step? Now they might be. They might be soon, they might be later to go to the step of canceling Tucker and Elon in totality! I guess like the threats that they’ve tried to do against, what is it Pavel Durov or however you pronounce his name, the Telegram owner.

 

But I think Elon and Tucker are too big to cancel.

 

I mean, I’d never say never, but at this stage, the system would have to go, … That would be a layer of tyranny, a layer of “mask off” that they would regret. It’s not going to lead to them, …

 

Joel Davis: Tucker is so connected on the Right. Like, Trump at the RNC had Tucker sitting right next to him and JD Vance and his son in the most important kind of part of the day one ceremony. It was like, very much showing the public, like:

 

“Tucker Carlson and Trump are, like, on the same team, just making that clear to everyone.”

 

And JD Vance follows Darryl Cooper, his Martyr Made. JD Vance follows him on Twitter, by the way.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, that’s fascinating!

 

Joel Davis: That conversation that just happened was a conversation between people who are part of the American conservative movement. They’re not like fringe people, right? This is like the American conservative movement. You can talk about World War Two like this now. That’s basically what this is. Well, it’s being negotiated. We’ll see how it responds, but I, …

 

Thomas Sewell: They basically having a private wignat conversation, but publicly with 50 million people. Because in the past, it was private conversation within conservatism.

 

And now he, …

 

Joel Davis: He pulled the handbrake a few times. Like, Tucker was like:

 

“Oh, so why did Churchill go to war, why did Churchill go through with it, even if there wasn’t in Britain’s interest?”

 

And then he smiles because it’s like, “it’s the jews”. That was the jew smile. And then Tucker’s like:

 

“That’s the most wry smile I’ve ever seen!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Like it ultimately ended in kind of Zionist financiers! It’s kind of like, let’s like, walk up to the boundary and then just like, step over it, like, slightly and step back.

 

[1:51:51]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Elon, as well, is important to consider. You’re right. You know, we are relying on these like, in the past with UPF, we were relying on Facebook, and that didn’t work enough there. But Zuckerberg’s obviously a jew, and organising there was never going to be forever. It was ideally just a temporary thing to build up what we could build up with it.

 

But Elon, for example, he’s bigger than just Twitter. I mean, Elon is deep within Elon’s Deep State. There’s no other way to put it. I mean, his rocket programme and his electric vehicle program. That’s armaments and ordinance. That’s World War Three. Elon is probably the most crucial person in the world regarding World War Three. He basically holds World War Three in his hand. The US is shit! NASA is, sorry, the US isn’t shit! I retract it, then. NASA is shit! Their manufacturing is shit! But Elon can produce vehicles. And if their oil supply is struggling, if they’ve got a strategic issue with their supply, he can organise vehicles, electric vehicles., …

 

Joel Davis: Space X is the only manufacturer of rocket engines in the United States, in the entire Western world.

 

Thomas Sewell: And on top of that, he’s got all the tech. He’s got all the A-grade tech, or however it’s defined. There’s like, these tiers of microchips, and they’re knocking Russia and China out of the what are the top tier of microchips are? So China, Russia, they can make microwaves, they can make, you know, computers, and they can make night vision goggles, and they can make a few other things, but they can’t make the really crucial ordinance for things like rockets, like intercontinental ballistic missiles, like the highest level microchips that they need to do this kind of stuff. So Elon Musk controls all the ballistic missile manufacturing, basically, in the United States. Obviously, there’s Lockheed Martin, and these smaller, but he’s controlling the major stuff, he’s controlling the big stuff.

 

And it’s all under the guise of a programme to go to Mars, which is the same reason why NASA made a programme to go to the moon to build these rockets, these big giant rockets that turn sideways as soon as they get high enough in the air. They don’t actually Pierce through the atmosphere a lot of the time.

 

But, yeah, he is absolutely! He is like a cornerstone. Musk is like a cornerstone of America’s World War Three ability.

 

And so this idea that they’re not also, … Because this comes back when I was saying, why did they do this interview? Why couldn’t this be a private conversation? Why did they have to go public with this? Why are they saying wignat talking points from ten years ago in front of 50 million people? And I don’t think it’s necessarily damage control. I think it’s only two possible things, and I think that. Oh, sorry, three things. The thing that Joel mentioned, and I skipped over because for some reason, I started talking about the bees.

 

But there’s obviously, World War Three is on the cards. It’s not definitely going to happen in a set amount of time. No one has a crystal ball. Well, we certainly don’t. But race war is coming. You know, World War Three is coming, some version of that. And this is a conversation that clearly one side of the power base in the United States needs to have in order to properly mobilise and win World War Three. Are they throwing the jews under the bus? Perhaps? Are they throwing a portion of the jews under bus? Perhaps? There’s a side that’s actually interested in winning World War Three within United States, State Department, within its Deep State.

 

And so there are things they necessarily have to do in order to win it.

 

The other thing, the other motivation I think they might have is they will do literally everything at this point. They will go all the way up to all of our talking points in order to make sure that people don’t have their eyes on us. If they’re the first people to say this stuff in the eyes of the general public, then who are we? We’re just copycats. It doesn’t matter that we’ve been saying this stuff for ten years or eight years or six years. That’s irrelevant. That doesn’t matter.

 

And so it’s not necessarily that the tail is wagging the dog, it’s that the tail doesn’t exist. We can be cancelled. We can be censored. We can be removed off Twitter. Our talking points are on there. They’re all on there now. They’re all mainstream now. So we’ve had a success there. But knowing the truth is only half the battle, then there’s action.

 

And so where we get into difficult territory is when the governments don’t have the ability to shut down Tucker. And the governments don’t have the ability to shut down Musk.

 

But what they do have the ability to do is charge people like yourself or myself with “inciting hatred”, you know, “inciting racial vilification”. They have the ability to shut down protest. They have the ability to shut down grassroots political action in its infancy, as you said, our communities and our political movements in their infancy, they have the ability to shut that down even if they can’t shut the narrative down.

 

And then the narrative itself becomes a blow-off valve. It just becomes commonplace. Everyone knows the truth about World War Two. But no one’s actually capable of doing anything about it. And all the people that are motivated to do something about it, well, they’re actually just completely thrown under the bus.

 

So that’s just some things I was thinking.

 

[1:56:55]

 

Joel Davis: , you know what? Like, I think if I was put in jail in Australia for some kind of hate speech crime, which I don’t think is going to happen anytime soon. I think Elon Musk would talk about it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he probably would.

 

Joel Davis: When Sam Melia got put in jail for the same thing, everyone kicked up a huge stink about it, and Elon Musk ended up talking about it, multiple times. That’s the thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but, …

 

Joel Davis: When we all coalesce online to push something that we are concerned about, it goes all the way up to Elon Musk and Tucker Carlson and all the most influential people in the kind of conversation on the American right now. Like, there’s a total pipeline from literally me and you and this conversation to them that exists. Like, there’s all these one degree and two degrees of separations just between us, and we’re just like one node of many, many nodes, across the whole world.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, Joel, Sam’s still in prison, and all of this is just words on a screen.

 

Joel Davis: It’s not just words on the screen, though, is it? Like, it is a total shift! Back in ten years ago, if White nationalists are getting getting attacked by the State, are super influential billionaires and massive, like conservative, the biggest conservative political commentators in the world defending those people? No! ! Are they, like, we’re in a different paradigm now. We’re in a completely different paradigm because there’s been this kind of, through Internet culture, there’s been this kind of admixture of our kind of what was previously a marginalised discourse, a kind of cliquey kind of niche on the Internet and mainstream Right-wing American political discourse, or Right-wing political discourse in general. Because it’s all kind of this one kind of hodgepodge now because of the nature of the Internet. Now it’s all kind of been brought into relation with one another.

 

And that’s why our talk, we’ve been talking about it on the show for the last year or so, noticing how more and more White nationalist talking points are bleeding into all these different conservative commentators in America and in Europe and so on, and how the paradigm is shifting and blah, blah, blah.

 

And it’s only maturing. Like, that process is only maturing, and we’re only getting more and more entrenched. And that influence doesn’t seem to be slowing down anytime soon. And it seems genuinely organic because the conservative movement is literally infiltrated with a bunch of our guys in the United States. There’s all these different.

 

Thomas Sewell: [words unclear]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, whatever whatever word you want to say, though, like, there literally is all these kind of points of connection between, … Like I just said, like, Thomas777’s talking points I saw used on that, at least one was used on that, for example. And Thomas 777 is a National Socialist dude who wears, like Confederate flag, you know, rings and swastika rings and shit and acts like a wignat on the Internet and talks about World War Two revisionism and things like that. Now that’s Tucker Carlson mainstream talking points now. There’s literally a wignat in the Tucker Carlson pipeline that exists.

 

And I’m not saying that means Tucker Carlson is 100% our guy or that the West is saved and all Right, then don’t interpret me the wrong way.

 

What I’m saying is that now we are controlling the Right-wing political culture. Like, the Right-wing is barely talking about “socialism sucks”! And ten years ago, that’s all they were talking about, how socialism sucks!:

 

“We’ve got a lower taxes and, oh, gay marriage. Was that a good idea or whatever?”

 

That’s kind of like what conservative discourse was before. Now almost the only topic that is relevant to anyone is things to do with the anti-White kind of cultural agenda or mass immigration or, basically racial issues are like the kind of key, fundamental thing that the Right-wing is talking about now.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely! But we need to consider what the next stage is so we have been talking about this stuff for ten years. And the niche Right, the far-Right, the fringe right, whatever it wants to be called, and the conservative movement, we’re finally seeing, … Like, one of the main significance of this interview, what it comes down to, is that it shows that they’re finally caught up! It’s like:

 

“Okay, oh, we’re here now in the timeline. Wow! Incredible!”

 

So when we see these kind of victories in the public discourse, when we see this kind of engagement and this kind of conversation in the public discourse, it can make us feel as a movement. I’m not talking about us as individuals, us three, but as a movement that has come this far, it can make us feel a bit redundant. It’s like, so all of the groundwork’s done.

 

But then Blair raises an important point. It’s not because Sam Melia is still in jail. You know, the British system is still locking up White nationalists. So we’ve made all these leaps and bounds. But what we’re not seeing is the fruition of that in terms of actual physical power. And that’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s no physical results.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So obviously we’re all happy with this victory, but this victory in itself is only half of the battle. It’s like we’re now, we’ve got the truth! The second half of the truth is the action.

 

Blair Cottrell: I suppose we need actual, what we lack is legitimate power and position in order to produce physical results.

 

[2:02:37]

 

Thomas Sewell: And if we’re now having our talking points as the mainstream talking points, awesome! We need to transition our motivations and our energy. Our direction needs to be focused, maybe less. Like, maybe we can leave a lot of the space now for conservatives. They can pick up the slack. Obviously, I love Hitler, but maybe our focus is less on reiterating these talking points over and over again, like the trans issue. Once we got the trans issue on the table and we protest a few Drag Queen Story Hours they couldn’t really come back from that they couldn’t really recover from that because the conservatives and people that weren’t, like, far, far-Right, started going:

 

“This is unacceptable. This is the line in the sand!”

 

And our focus, I believe our focus needs to be on statecraft. I believe our focus needs to be on state power. Our focus needs to be on not necessarily constantly regurgitating these talking points like we have for ten years. We need to be considering restructuring the state and looking at our politics from the perspective of designing the new state, instead of looking at our politics as what are our grievances, what are our historical truths, what are our propaganda efforts and recalibrate our everything. Like, even just these kind of shows.

 

Obviously, our organisation’s already geared that way. But we need to gear everything, I believe, for achieving state power. Because if we don’t, then we have led the conservative movement to this crucial point in time. We’ve led the conservative movement in a sense of being, it’s kind of autistic seers. [chuckling] You know, we’ve been talking about this Hitler stuff for ten years, and now the conservative moves finally at the point where they’re on the precipice of talking about Hitler being the good guy. And then we can just be the useful idiots or not the useful idiots, but our job is done! We’re the seers, we’re the scouts. We’ve led them that way.

 

We’re not needed anymore, because we don’t offer anything else. Now the conservative movement has got the winning formula. It’s like, what was his name? Bannon, the advisor for Trump, he got the winning formula. He helped Trump get elected in 2016. He had the formula, appeal to White people, appeal to White grievances. And then as soon as Trump came to power, he was just basically discarded and the jews got him.

 

And so my fear is that the winning formula for the Right-wing and for conservatives to gain power again and take back serious amounts of power, power from the Left and institutional power is things like this. Hijacking our talking points, not necessarily hijacking, but catching up to where we are, start fighting in this arena, taking, they’re going to take more state power and then they don’t have use for us. And yes, Sam Melia is still in jail.

 

Joel Davis: Well, that’s one area where we actually need good anti-conservative talking points. Like, this is something that I’ve said for a while, that one of our main jobs is to attack conservatism and conservatives, not just only attack the Left, because ultimately that’s the kind of, we talk about on the show all the time like [words unclear]

Thomas Sewell: We talked about, this new centre is rising. And to me, we have to be cautious because we’ve been predicting this rise of the new centre since the show has been around since the first episode and, or at least the first episode I was put on. And now we’re finally, it’s rearing its head now! 50 million people are tuning into Holocaust revisionism! [chuckling] You know, they can jujitsu this, they can twist this, they can turn this.

 

And ultimately, we shouldn’t trust them. It’s awesome! It’s good news. But I, we’ve got to keep our heads focused. I think that’s what I want to finish on.

 

Joel Davis: We definitely need to build an alternative. That’s the main issue.

 

Thomas Sewell: Statecraft!

 

Joel Davis: Well, because we can say, like:

 

“Well, this is our verbal criticisms, like, of why we ideologically disagree.”

 

But it’s like if you can’t point to some other kind of political movement and say:

 

“So this is why you should support these guys rather than those guys.”

 

Then ultimately the rubber doesn’t actually hit the road. It’s all just abstract.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: So there’s a lot of people that are, whether someone is a full on, like, completely cucked, like:

 

“Israel’s our greatest ally. And the problem isn’t immigration, it’s illegal immigration. And gay marriage is great. And me and my black friends watch the NFL together and eat hot wings, yeah, my wife’s an Asian, big deal!”

 

Or you’re like:

 

“Yeah, Hitler probably was the good guy!”

 

If both those kinds of people are still going to just pull the lever for Trump, then effectively it’s politically equivalent.

 

So it’s like, there needs to be something other than, like, vote harder-ism. Like, there has to be something else that you can actually channel this energy into.

 

But the reason why it’s so good is because there is energy to be channeled. For a long time we were trying to squeeze juice out of an already kind of squeezed orange. Now we’ve got a nice juicy orange just ready to, like make orange juice. It’s kind of a weird analogy, but I don’t know why I went there!

 

The point is, …

 

[2:07:30]

 

Thomas Sewell: Think about the recruitment we’ve had lately. For those that aren’t aware, those that are watching the show, anyone that’s within the organize at the moment is like, overwhelmed with recruits. We’re getting, at the start of the year, it was more than we’ve ever had. I was very impressed. We were getting a very good, steady rate of recruits coming in. It’s at the point now where all of our branch leaders, all of our regional leaders are just saturated with vetting calls, almost every night. And luckily, it’s not all resting on the state leaders. Otherwise the state leaders would all be burnt out because they’d be doing so many calls every night. I mean, we’re just recruiting so many guys at the moment. And this is before the Tucker Carlson interview.

 

So I can imagine if we got into nationalism through being red pilled on this stuff and then seeking action instead of just education on the Internet. I can only imagine downstream of this interview, maybe not immediately, but someone watches this interview and they learn the truth about World War Two, it starts unlocking the stuff.

 

I mean, I talk to guys all the time, new recruits:

 

“Oh, how long have you been in the scene? Or how long have you been online?”

 

And some people are perpetually online. They’ve been in the scene online two or three years before they joined the organize. But a lot of guys who have recruited recently, they’re like:

 

“Oh, I found out about this stuff two months ago, and I did a deep dive and I watched all these documentaries!”

 

And you’re like:

 

“Two months ago? Wow! Like, you figured this out in 2024? That’s incredible!”

 

Like, I don’t know, we’re just getting this new fresh, …

 

Blair Cottrell: In the days before the last day everything speeds up.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, it is getting faster. People are like they watch the first thing, the first, like, microscopic understanding. Wasn’t there a guy, we’re talking in one of your chats recently, Joel, who said that only just recently, he saw something, I won’t mention him by name because I don’t want to like, not dox him, but I don’t want to damage, because he’s trying to do things publicly. But everyone was asking him, like:

 

“Where did you get red pilled?”

 

And he was like:

 

“Oh, a couple months ago, I saw this video, and I was doing some research into fertility. And then the replies to this research about White fertility was just like led me down this path. And within a couple months, I was understanding the things we all understand.”

 

And it’s just like one little door opens. And then within such a short period of time now, people are actually getting involved and engaging in real life activism, community building, active club training. I mean, it’s just really impressive to see. It’s just going to be crazy!

 

Joel Davis: And I think it also vindicates, like things that have happened recently, I think have vindicated, I would say, my, but also our approach, because we all have a similar approach, which is a lot of people said:

 

“Oh, Joel, like you’re going too hard, basically. You’re going too hard! You know, if you just kind of clean the optics up and, just toned it down. And kept it intellectual, you know, everyone would love you’d appeal to so many people, but you’ve gone too far. You went too far into the swastika!”

 

No!

 

Thomas Sewell: You made a few enemies, adversaries when you sort of started to move into our scene, and when you joined the organize. Like, I remember where you were when you were sort of teetering on it, when you were thinking about it, when you started associating with us. And you were networked with a lot of different groups of people, a lot of the wider sphere, and a lot of these people, they didn’t say, turn on you, but they became adversarial towards you as soon as you started associating with me.

 

And as soon as you started going:

 

“Well, actually, I like the swastika, and actually, the Roman salute is pretty cool!”

 

And [chuckling] when you started doing that, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Think about what that means. Think about what that means. Joel could have declared for anyone, but he declared for this group. He declared for this community. Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, the power of the swastika bled through him. If you’re an honest person, you can’t reject it.

 

Joel Davis: I was never against that’s the thing. Like, I’ve been a Nazi the whole time, but that I was just trying to, … Okay, the logic of what you can get away with online and what, you can track, you know, it was different rules as well. You would get banned online. When I was trying to have a YouTube show, people would be like:

 

“Oh, your YouTube show is cucked because you didn’t say this about the jews.”

 

And I was like:

 

“I’m literally on YouTube. If you go on my Telegram, you’ll see that’s what I think about the jews. But I can’t say it on YouTube because my YouTube will get banned instantly! Like, I’m just aware of that’s what the Terms of Service are.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Well, but someone needs to be on YouTube promoting White nationalism. So I’m doing it, but I have to do it in a slightly cucked way to get away with it.”

 

So I was trying to play the game. But I came to the determination that that was all kind of a waste of energy because there’s lots of people that are doing that, but not that many people have the balls and the competence simultaneously to just go to the logical conclusion and try and force the issue there. And that’s where the maximum amount of power is for driving the dialectic.

 

And what I have seen transpire on Right-wing Twitter over the past two years is basically Nazis bullying all of Right-wing Twitter into being Nazis. And it basically has worked where there was this broad Right-wing Twitter sphere of all these different sub-genres of Right-wingers and so on. And they’ve all just been bullied relentlessly by Nazis.

 

And now, basically everyone is afraid, even if they aren’t actually, that, like, Nazis, they’re afraid to say anything that would piss off Nazis!

 

[2:14:00]

 

 

Just kind of like how, like, communists almost, …

 

Blair Cottrell: So true.

 

Joel Davis: And I saw that bullying was an effective mechanism. I already always knew that bullying was effective, but I saw that it was a very effective mechanism. Specifically when we had certain campaigns, you know, pushing anti-semitism and so on. When I started thinking about online activism as a paradigm, and I started realizing how particularly, like, my experiences with the groypers, how you can just kind of create these bullying campaigns, pressure campaigns and create, do these e-pogroms on the jews and so on. And then I just extended that principle out further and said:

 

“Well, if we have profound moral fortitude that is built around blood loyalty, and we just pushed, like, full power to pedal to the metal that is going to basically, … There’s a whole bunch of people that are Nazi adjacent, but all of them are just going to become like, 10, 15, 20% more extreme, and then they’re going to pull everyone else around them, 20% more extreme. And then it just kind of keeps, like, reverberating forward and back down the system, and everything is getting dragged, you know, toward the swastika.”

 

So I was like:

 

“Well, I’m just going to set up shop right at the front of that process and just be trying to lead the charge.”

 

And I think it’s worked very well because a lot of people in the broader movement know who I am. So my influence, I don’t have the most followers. A lot of people have way more followers than me, but most of the leaders of the movement follow me. So therefore, anything that I say influences the people who are influential.

 

And I have noticed that, yeah, there was people that put up resistance to what I’ve been doing, but also I saw a lot of people adopting and taking up my influence and being inspired and going a little bit harder and so on. And I got inspired by you guys and other people, and we all inspire each other, and we just kind of all dragging each other in this more aggressive direction, and that’s dragging the entire Right-wing in a more aggressive direction.

 

So, to me, it’s not just about like:

 

“Okay, so how can I present one individual like the Joel Davis brand or the Blair Cottrell brand?”

 

It’s more like thinking about the movement at large. What serves the movement. What serves the movement at large is basically maximum ideological purity.

 

Now, as an individual, maximum ideological purity can actually disadvantage you because it means you’re going to piss people off, alienate people. You’re going to be harder to associate with. For people who are peripheral figures who have got one foot in the kind of mainstream and one foot in the dissident sphere or whatever. So it closes a lot of opportunities to you. It forces you to basically disassociate from people that maybe they could help you individually, because that would then impact your ideological purity to kind of tone it down, to associate with them or whatever. But the ultimate net benefit of it is that the ideologically pure message is being socially reinforced.

 

And so that’s the direction that I decided to go in. And it seems very positive. Like, I think like we talked about on the show last week, like, Barry Stanton was the biggest story on Twitter last week on the entire website, just posting, like, nonstop, like, pajeet hate. And it wasn’t even that intelligent. It was just like:

 

“They fucking stink! And they’re fucking gross, and we hate them!”

 

And everyone was like, pretty much the whole world was like:

 

“Yeah, like he’s got some points. Like, he’s got facts!”

 

And just became the biggest thing on Twitter for a week. Now the biggest thing on Twitter is talking about [chuckling] you know, World War Two revisionism somehow, but which is kind of crazy! Twitter’s, basically 4chan now. It’s crazy, but these are the very things that I was arguing about a year ago or so, where people were saying:

 

“Oh, you know, Joel the race hate and the talking about Hitler stuff. Like that isn’t going to play with the masses. You know, that’s going to alienate people.”

 

And now the last week, it’s like, the two biggest stories in political Twitter is World War Two revisionism, and we hate pajeets, and it’s like:

 

“No, actually, our worldview is interesting. Like, actually, racism and Hitler is more interesting than nationalism.”

 

Nationalism is less viral, has less viral potential, and is less interesting and less compelling and less fun. And it’s just not as good in general.

 

And so you could take the cuck way out, and maybe that’ll be good for your personal career, because you’ll be less controversial, and we can share you, …

 

Thomas Sewell: And it’s more thinking about the now rather than the later.

 

Joel Davis: Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s where I first came to this, because I started my journey very uncertain as to how do I play this? And the most annoying man on earth entered my life. And that’s Jacob Hersant! And he was constantly just like:

 

“Tom, you got to start naming the jews!”

 

It was like, 4chan in real life. It was like:

 

“Name the jews, Tom!”

 

And I was just like:

 

“Who’s this 16 year old, like, autist?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Oh, Tom, when he. When is UPF going to start doing Roman salutes?”

 

And I’m like:

 

“No, Jacob, we’re not doing that.”

 

[chuckling]

 

[2:19:25]

 

Blair Cottrell: I always thought he was just trying to get us to do stuff like that to amuse himself, but, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe he was.

 

Blair Cottrell: I can see that he was a man with a vision. He was a man with a vision! He understood.

 

Thomas Sewell: I believed in Jacob from day one, because every time I get into an argument about Hitler stuff, even though we both knew the same, we both had a statement of agreed facts. He would force those facts into the light. He would force those facts to not just be a fact in on itself as just a statement, but he would force a derivative, like an action from that fact to occur. And there’s a fullness to that. There was like a fullness to his youthful genius like provocation. It’s like he had this force flowing through him that was clearly attention seeking, provoking, annoying.!:

 

“Like, let’s annoy the government. Let’s stir it! Like, will this annoy the government? Will this stir the government?”

 

He’s a natural propagandist.

 

But then it’s like, so then when you psychoanalyze someone like that, you’re like:

 

“Oh, well, his motivations are not correct. Because his motivations are this and that.”

 

And you’re trying to shoot the messenger.

 

And instead of looking at the message itself and being like:

 

“Well, clearly there is some motivation to stir the pot here.”

 

But that’s irrelevant. What’s relevant is that if we’re going to win, what does winning look like? And does winning look like some milk toast half assed version? Or does it look like White men having dignity and standing upright and doing it properly? Are we going to do it properly? Are we going to go all the way with this? Are we really going to summon the strength and do it properly? Or is it just going to be this kind of conservative, you know, revolution? Not even a revolution.

 

Blair Cottrell: Be careful what you say. Don’t step out of line!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, exactly! Like, are we going to play the game the whole way? Or at some point are we going to just be like fuck it, mask off?

 

Joel Davis: I think everyone will eventually catch up. Like, I believe in the apparent qualities of what we believe and what we say. Like, I think what we say has the potential to be attractive to hundreds of millions of White people. Would be like, actually I believe in racism. I believe in National Socialism.

 

Blair Cottrell: What we say will be more attractive to millions of White people when their children can’t even go to school or walk down the street without perhaps being stabbed or raped! Then it will be especially attractive!

 

Joel Davis: It’s already attractive right now. They haven’t heard it enough. If they heard it more, they would realise that it’s awesome!

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, they know. Like, they know what side they’re on. That’s the beauty of it, is not everyone’s an ideologue, but they know what side they’re on.

 

And, I mean, this comes back to the our grandmas versus refugee grandmas. The grandmas, they support us. They might not, the real grandmas, …

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I almost thought we were going to get through an episode without the grandmas being mentioned! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: We got to support the grandmas!

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s like, I’ll give you an example. It’s not grandma related, but it’s this idea that not all support is necessarily ideological. A lot of support is just irrational. It’s just feeling. It doesn’t have to be this, like, rational thought process.

 

And I was at work very recently, I think it was on Tuesday, we were doing a re-roof, and there was some carpenters that were sent there. I’ve never met these guys before. And they noticed the symbol on my drill. I have, like kind of like an EAM [European Australian Movement] symbol. I have a Celtic cross on all my tools because everyone has the same identical tools. So you have to put a symbol or your name or something on your tools. Every tradesman knows this, right? And they asked me for my reset saw, so I pass it to them.

 

And then he saw the he saw the cross on it, the sun cross, and he was like:

 

“Oh, what’s this? Is this like a swastika?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yeah, it’s like a swastika, but it’s legal. Like, swastikas are illegal, so I can’t really draw them on job sites. Like, I’ll probably get in trouble, but like, that’s the next best thing.”

 

And he was like:

 

“Oh, cool, what is it?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh, it’s like a sun cross. Like a Celtic cross.”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Oh, is that like Nazi stuff?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yeah, yeah, I’m a Nazi.”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Are you like an actual Nazi?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yeah, I’m full Nazi!”

 

And he’s like:

 

“A full Nazi!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yeah, I’m a full Nazi.”

 

And then there was two carpenters, and the other carpenter leaned over and was like:

 

“Are you a Nazi?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yeah, I’m a full Nazi.”

 

And then they were like:

 

“Oh, wow! Yeah. I mean I guess I’m mostly a Nazi.”

 

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling] You made them feel safe. [chuckling] Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes! And I was like:

 

“Mostly a Nazi?”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Well, I’m not. I wouldn’t say I’m a full Nazi. Like, full, full Nazi. But I’d say I’m mostly Nazi.”

 

And I was like:

 

“That’s funny. I’ve never heard that someone say they’re mostly Nazi before. I was like, that’s like, Nazi’s not a binary anymore. It’s a spectrum. It’s like we’re all a little bit Nazi. You know, it’s not just we’re all a little bit racist.”

 

But he liked the symbol that I had on my drill. And he was like:

 

“Yeah, I guess I’m mostly Nazi.”

 

Like, he didn’t need to know our ideology. He didn’t need to know about the Holocaust. The jews. Like, this stuff helps him, obviously, because public consensus is important for shifting things.

 

But he didn’t need to know about, … He doesn’t need to have social media. You know what happens when social media gets shut down? It doesn’t really matter. There’s a rising tide of our spirit in all paradigms, not just in the Twitter world. It’s happening in all the worlds! All simultaneously.

 

[2:24:54]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It’s a vibe shift.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yep.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s a huge white pill. We’ve got a lot of Superchats to get through, boys, tonight. So did you want to start wrapping it up and getting through those? Because we’ve got a big day tomorrow, and I want to make sure I get enough sleep.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So I got one from Entropy that came in late last week. I don’t think I mentioned it. He said:

 

“Joel, you mentioned a few months ago, …”

 

This is from Domest.

 

“You mentioned a few months ago on the show that you’re in contact with a Polish nationalist who was involved in repatriating the foreign born diaspora back to Poland. I am considering leaving Canada permanently and would like to get in touch with him. How can I do so?”

 

I haven’t spoken to him since I was in Poland, like, almost a year ago. So I haven’t spoken to him lately. Not because we fell out or anything, I just haven’t. But Polish Connection is the name of his Twitter channel, and it has a chat connected to it. So find Polish Connection on Telegram. I think I said Twitter then. I meant Telegram. Find Polish connection on Telegram, then go into the chat and ask about it, and he’ll DM you. That’s the easiest way to go about it.

 

Got a bunch of Superchats from GoyBoy1488, and what I love about it is he always sends $14.88 Superchats. And his profile picture is basically Giga Chad as a SS soldier with a, [chuckling] you know, Nazi flag in the background. So he’s like, 100% all about it. He said:

 

“Early bird, American electrician, carrying the donations for the finest Aussies. Let’s go fund these lads!”

 

With a like a little e-Roman thing.

 

And he also said:

 

“I have the Stalag edition of Mein Kampf, but I’ve not read it yet. Is Dalton substantially better than Stalag?”

 

I don’t know anything really about the Stalag edition.

 

Thomas Sewell: Jacob says that the Stalag, even though it’s the one that was officially sanctioned by the NSDAP to be translated into English, Jacob says that the translation is actually not good, and that it’s clunky, and that it’s not as fluid. It’s a translation from a German perspective into English, instead of an English person bringing the beauty of it into English.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that makes sense. And Jacob, I trust Jacob. And Jacob says the Dalton is the best translation. And Jacob’s the only person I know that’s read probably every single translation and actually has an educated opinion about it because he’s actually would be the kind of guy that would put in the time. Where, like, most people have an opinion of:

 

“I like this translation!”

 

And it’s like, that’s because that’s the only version that you’ve actually read! So you’re just saying you like it because you like it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s me!

 

Joel Davis: You haven’t actually compared it to anything. So why are you giving an opinion right now? [chuckling] Like, only Jacob Hersant, and maybe, like, 30 other autists have read all the different translations and have an educated opinion like, let’s be real! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Got a whole bunch of Superchats from Rumble. Are you finished with yours, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: No, there’s still more on Odysee. The same guy also said:

 

“Is Australia the best hope of Whites world-wide?”

 

I really fucking hope not!

 

But I think we bring a good energy to the global scene, because, particularly us, in particular.

 

But I think Aussies in general, because Aussies, we go straight to the point. Australians are the wignat race in many ways. We got a very kind of no nonsense, aggressive style and how we go about life in our personalities. And that comes through when Aussies become White nationalists, they usually go pretty fucking hard! Yeah, so that we bring that kind of …

 

Thomas Sewell: Steve Laws just shared the photo of our rally. He’s a British White nationalist.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we love Steve laws. Never had him on the channel.

 

Thomas Sewell: So I think the whole world, their eyes were on Australia. I think the whole world’s gonna wake up!

 

Joel Davis: The English guys love us. Like, we’ve got obvious reasons and we’re, …

 

Thomas Sewell: And the Americans.

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re close to the English. We’re probably like 10% less sociopathic than the English. And that 10% is filled with just friendliness and banter. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: All the guys I get on with best on Right-wing Twitter, like Steve Laws, he’s great. He had a debate. I haven’t listened to it yet, but I want to listen to it. He had a debate recently on ethno-nationalism with some, like, big conservative, you know, media guy in Britain.

 

And also, by the way, we haven’t mentioned it on this show. In Britain lately the discourse is really transforming quite quickly. Like a lot of the conservative media in Britain is going hard against immigration. It’s very clear that the riots really changed the energy. And you’re seeing all these articles coming out like, “Mass mmigration is bad for Britain” and so on. Reform Party’s surging in the polls again. And Steve Laws has been going viral on Twitter, getting into these debates and arguments over ethno-nationalism. And they’re doing a good job of asserting themselves in the political scene over there.

 

And I really like Zoomer Historian, who’s another English guy. He’s been on active on Twitter more recently, but he’s got a great YouTube channel where he does a lot of World War Two revisionism and stuff like that. Great YouTube channel. Go subscribe to him if you haven’t already. 100% our guy, great content, but also his Twitter is quite good.

 

And obviously we’re friends with Mark Collett. But Barry Stanton is English, obviously, friend of the show. There’s a lot of really good English accounts. Pretty much all the English accounts that I know of have a very positive view towards us. So I feel like we got a special Bond with them for obvious reasons, because we’re the same fucking people!

 

But I think also in general, I think the global movement seems to like us because we just bring that kind of aggressive energy.

 

[2:30:57]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: We should say something about how capable we are, like just genetically and as part of our overall disposition. When not so long ago we had such a powerful empire, we could pretty much get away with anything and achieve anything. That was only a couple hundred years ago. So we are the remnants of that. We’re the sort of residual remains of that great empire. And I’m proud of that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think Anglo Saxons are the master race. I mean, we can have a co-master. The Germanic race could be the master race, I guess, but, like. Yeah, I think we are., …

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s that time of night, …

 

Joel Davis: Our achievements are fucking incredible! And no one has a military history as epic as the Anglo Saxon, I don’t think, ever! So, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Minus Winston Churchill. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but I mean yeah, I mean we still fucking won, unfortunately! I wish we had lost. You know, we’re just too good. Even when we’re on the wrong side, we keep winning. Like, when the Australians went to North Africa, we were just destroying, we just destroyed the Italians, made them look like, … I feel bad about it. We should have left them alone. But we killed it in North Africa in World War Two, and then we just destroyed the Japs. You know, we. Every time we go to war, like, proper war, like, we fucking absolutely slay!

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re a war-like species. Because we’re a creative people, and we use that creative powers for war, like, we are just a war-like race. This is why the non-White races of the world have spent a lot of time learning to fight us indirectly, because if they fight us directly, they know they lose.

 

Joel Davis: All right, next Superchat. Lon Awfully said:

 

“Hi, fellas, Flood from the Flood show was talking about how he’d like to have any of you guys on, and if that. I could ask you guys next time in the chat if you’re interested.”

 

Well, I don’t know who that is, but if he wants to invite us on the show, he’d have to get in contact with us. We’re pretty easy to get in contact with on social media. Non-existent, just sent a Roman. That’s all the Odysee Superchats, I think. So you want me to read out the Rumble ones, Blair, or do you want to read them out? Sometimes you like reading them out? You gonna answer me?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Blair. Do you want to read them out?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yes. Sorry, I was just listening to something that someone sent me. Yeah, we do have a fair few Superchats from Rumble. I’ll begin with Tiamax. He sends in $20. Thanks very much. And says:

 

“The global citizens, obliged to protect themselves, will turn on that minority of revolutionaries. In brackets he says (Noahides – these destroyers of humanity) and utterly destroy them.”

 

Well, thanks for the input. I can’t say I’m necessarily sure what this guy means. Are any you guys following that?

 

Joel Davis: I think he’s referring to the jews.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. Yeah, I think I get it. But Lion Cross is our next donor. $50 he sends. Thanks very much, mate. He says:

 

“The Ford translation of Mein Kampf is exceptional. The narrator of the official audiobook coincidentally speaks with similar vocal intonations and inflections as Blair back in his UPF speech days.”

 

Thomas Sewell: All things are limited to time. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ve heard that audiobook, and yeah, it gets you fired up. He’s got a really good voice.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, is that the one? Is that the one he’s talking about Tom, you just paraphrased it? I know that one.

 

Thomas Sewell: All things are limited to time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I remember that video. Right. That is a good translation and audiobook. Definitely agree. I know the one.

 

Joel Davis: Masculine, but at the same time, like, classy English accent.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Must not mix with, … Yeah, he’s really good! It’s a really good audiobook.

 

Blair Cottrell: Another Superchat from Lion Cross. Another $50. Thanks very much, mate. Very generous tonight:

 

“The best thing about this interview is that it can be used practically in that it’s very normie and Boomer friendly. As an introduction to World War Two revisionism. It’s also viral and easy to share around. It’s already viral.”

 

[2:35:43]

 

Joel Davis: I agree with that’s the thing about these people who were like:

 

“Oh, they weren’t being based enough.”

 

Like, yeah, it wasn’t like if Tucker Carlson interviewed, like, me or something. It wasn’t at that level.

 

But then Tucker Carlson isn’t going to fucking interview someone like me for that exact fucking reason! He’s going to interview some slightly cucked guy like him to break the ice. And so and that’s a good, smooth entry point. Like, you know, people often going from zero to 100 can be a bit much for most people. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Tucker’s just trying to fill the role of a normie whisperer. And we need those guys. He’s kind of pained by doing it sometimes, too, I reckon. I can see that sometimes he’s playing out a role that he’s tired of playing, but he still does it anyway because that’s his job.

 

Cronon sends $10 and says:

 

“Are you guys familiar with the book Ordinary Men? It’s about a German police battalion mass executing jews in Poland. Is that true? If so, was it a response to ethnic cleansing of Germans there?”

 

I’m not familiar with the book. Are you guys?

 

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m not. But what I’ll say is that every time I go into the bookstore, there’s a special shelf, and on that shelf there’s like 20 books. And all of them are books on the Holocaust, and they’re all just written by fucking liars! And so it depends. Is that a book written by a German soldier, or a Polish soldier? Or is it a book written by a jew?

 

Blair Cottrell: Can’t say.

 

Thomas Sewell: So I went to a community centre recently because they had a nice playground with Luna. And they had a kids library there. We’re going through the books, and that was awesome!

 

And then there was a section right in the corner, in the back corner, because it was attached to a church, and it was like one of those Uniting churches. And in the back corner there was an adult section of the books, and there was only three books in the adult section. There was the Bible, and then there was Holocaustianity. There was two books written by jews about something about Auschwitz.

 

And I was like:

 

“What the fuck!”

 

Cukg So, yeah, I don’t know the book. Yeah, there’s so many books. You get. You go. I’m telling you, I go through the blurbs of them and I skim read through them. And it’s the same nonsense! It’s always.

 

Blair Cottrell: And in regards to the second part of the question being that the book is about a German police battalion, mass executing jews in Poland, it doesn’t really strike me as the kind of thing a police battalion would do, but I can’t say whether there’s any truth to it. But if it did happen, I’m sure it was deserved.

 

Ukrainian groyper is the next Superchatter he’s sending through $10. Thanks very much Ukrainian groyper. He asks:

 

“Are there any authors from Australia similar to Sam Francis in the US or Jonathan Bowden in England?

 

Joel Davis: Well, first, Sam Francis and Jonathan Bowden aren’t that similar to each other. They’re very different. But I can’t think of a direct comparison to either of those authors, really.

 

Blair Cottrell: If you want to read a good Australian author, read Joel’s Telegram channel.

 

Joel Davis: One day I’ll write a book. Maybe then. Maybe then.

 

Thomas Sewell: Frederick Toben is a good writer, Australian.

 

Blair Cottrell: Another $10 as well from Lion Cross again:

 

“Would be great to hear Tom on relating Odin to Adolf Hitler sometime. Maybe on one of his Odysee streams.”

 

Joel Davis: It’s on every Tom Odysee stream. What do you mean? You obviously don’t watch the Tom’s Odysee streams. [chuckling]

 

[I think Lion Cross is being humourously sarcastic – Kat]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, you got a bit of catching up to do their Lion Cross.

 

Thomas Sewell: I could do a specific one on that. But Joel is making a fair comment. That is, at some point that gets dropped almost every Odysee.

 

Joel Davis: At some point I thought it would be cool if we did a podcast on – because that would enable us to spurg out about this subject – on Jung’s writings on Hitler in World War Two and so on. Because that theory is kind of advanced, I don’t actually love the way that Jung presents it. I would be critical of it.

 

But he’s also onto something with that theory. That would be a fun podcast to do one day. We’d kind of analyze that. I think we probably will.

 

Blair Cottrell: Next Superchat is from Fellow Comrade. Fellow comrade is a staunch supporter of the show. I see his name pop up a fair bit. I think he was on the X space last night. Wasn’t he, Joe? He’s sending us through $5. Thanks very much, mate. He says:

 

“I appreciate three best people having a conversation and also the three stages of alopecia on this stream!”

 

Yeah, [chuckling] you genuinely got a laugh out of me there. Am I at the first stage? Shit! Am I like, stage A? I hope I’m stage A. [chuckling] Wow! Okay.

 

Thomas Sewell: Skin condition? What’s alopecia?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, alopecia’s hair loss, man.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling] That’s kind of funny!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Anyway, Lion Cross again. Thanks very much, mate.

 

Another $50. What do you do for a job Lion Cross? You make bank, man:

 

“Always got a chuckle out of Joel giving the chat a hiding over weak Superchats or small donations. Hope this helps as you move between jobs.”

 

Well, that’s really kind.

 

Joel Davis: I actually don’t attack the chat for giving small donations. I attack the chat for saying dumb shit! And then I have to read it out because they send me money. And it’s like, you send me $5 and make me read out something for fucking gay and retarded! It’s not really worth the $5. Like, at least if you’re going to make me read something gay and retarded, at least send more money so it’s worth it, you know?

 

[2:41:17]

 

Thomas Sewell: I just don’t see it. Just don’t. Yeah, there’s a lot of $1 Superchats I saw, or $1 donations that came up, and it was like:

 

“I fucking hate Indians! Oh, I fucking hate Indians!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I saw that.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t mind that. I don’t mind the grug thing. You don’t have to write some fucking, like, PhD thesis in the Superchat.

 

Thomas Sewell: Of course.

 

Joel Davis: Just say something that’s fun or interesting or cool.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, one of them got through to me. I just can’t stop thinking about the fact that apparently I have alopecia. I don’t think I do, but we’ll see.

 

Thomas Sewell: Don’t stress. Like, you’re fine, you’re doing fine. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ll be right. [chuckling] Actually, the last haircut I got, like, it’s one of those places you go to where you just sit there and you get whoever’s available, because I didn’t have time to book. And I got some Indian woman, and I knew I was going to be disappointed, but I just didn’t have time on come back later, so I thought, fuck it, I’ll just get it done. And she cut it so egregiously short. I was so upset with it. So I’m in the process of growing it back.

 

But Ghost Dog Man sends through $10.

 

Joel Davis: I fucking hate Indians strikes again!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man. Yeah. They did the one thing that is pushed me over the line into full Indian hatred, which is they fucked my hair up! [chuckling] The Ghost Dog Man $10. Thanks very much, mate:

 

“Aryan Power, man!”

 

He says:

 

“Joel, you got to me with how freedom leads to love. That explains, partially, how shackled and outside of love I and many other Aryans have been just existing with.”

 

That’s deep.

 

Joel Davis: I know it’s kind of gay, but.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, [chuckling] thanks for the Superchat, bro. I feel you, bro. Don’t worry about Joel. I feel you.

 

Anyway, Lion Cross again, this time, like, reaching into the bottom of what’s left in his pocket, only sends through $10. Thanks anyway.

 

Thomas Sewell: Sends like $200 and you’re like:

 

“Oh, let’s beast him.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Last Superchat from Lion Cross is the strategy of Joel jumping in and out of as many spaces that will have him, combined with his saturation of posts on X, will surely make him go viral eventually. 20,000 followers, it’s working.”

Joel Davis: I’ve gone viral before a few times. I’m sure I’ll go viral again. It’s actually 28,000 followers. Thank you very much.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can go viral without even trying to. Like, you know how you can have a passive income where you can get businesses and you can make money without actually working? You run businesses. It works with influence, too. If you establish yourself well enough as an influencer, people just repost your stuff, like, from years ago, and it still gets, like, hundreds of thousands or millions of views and you don’t have to do anything.

 

So, you know, once you’re well established, your influence grows on its own.

 

Joel Davis: The thing that really holds me back on Twitter is that on Twitter, when you post images or videos, they have a tendency to get a lot more attention because people will, like, repost them more, quote, tweet them more, but also the algorithm preferences them. Like, if you scroll through Twitter, you’ll notice that more than half of the things you scroll through are an image, or a video.

 

But it’s only a small minority of posts that are images or videos. Most posts are just words.

 

So if you just post words, the likelihood of it coming up on someone’s screen is much lower than if you post, you know, image or video.

 

But the problem is, when I post image, or a video, my account has the maximum amount of warnings and sensitive content, like, things attached to it also, like search bans and shit like that! But that means that if I ever post an image, or a video, unless you have the settings changed, it actually won’t come up, and then, or will come up, and you have to click the “show sensitive content”. Like, it would be like, sensitive content warning.

 

And then you could have to press the show button for it to pop up. So that really, like, diminishes my ability to have viral posts on Twitter where I could just put clips and shit on there all the time and that go hard otherwise.

 

So that’s really annoying, to be honest. I wish I could get that reversed. I don’t actually know how to. If anyone knows how to get that reversed, by the way, give me your insight. Or I heard Barry Stanton. Apparently there’s White hats that are inside Twitter that are doing battle with the Indian tech bros and trying to restore his accounts. So I know if those guys exist, if you could confer some grace upon me. It would be cool if Twitter QAnon is actually real, if there are patriots in control, like, deep within Twitter that are, … But they obviously don’t love me too much. I mean, they haven’t banned me, but.

 

By the way, Tom, have you appealed your suspension?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, I haven’t.

 

Joel Davis: Are you not going to appeal it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom’s got stuff to do, man. Twitter’s, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I am going to appeal it! I am going to appeal it. I’m making a promise to myself of all the things that I need to do first as just a matter of principle. And when those things are done, then I’m going to appeal it.

 

[2:46:28]

 

Joel Davis: All right.

 

Thomas Sewell: When I’m ready.

 

Joel Davis: You’ve got a burner Twitter account so you’re still wasting time on there. You’re kind of cheating.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, I’m not on there much! Look at it. Like there’s not that many posts. Once in a blue moon.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I didn’t even know it was there until yesterday. That concludes our Superchats from Rumble.

 

Is there anything else, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: No, I think that’s it.

 

So, yeah, anyway, let’s end the show here. We’ve been gone for ages, but it was a good show tonight. I thought it was a fun show and we got a lot of people tuning in. I saw at one point on just on Rumble, there was like over 700 live viewers and there’s almost 100 over on Odysee and like 50 on Cozy.

 

So, you know, we’re getting up to the point where we’re almost at like a thousand live viewers, which is a kind of target that I’m kind of aiming at hitting. So it seems like the show, every week we just gradually accumulate a few more dribs and drabs of more, more viewers. We’ve got a bit of momentum. So it’s good. The show keeps growing. We’re de-platformed, but we actually have more viewers now than ever, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s been a good one. I think we peaked just on Rumble, somewhere around 750 live viewers, which we don’t typically get for just a regular show. But there was some big news this week, and whenever there’s something big in the news, more people than usual lean over to see what we’re going to say about it.

 

But thanks, everyone, for joining us. Appreciate it, as always. Thanks for all the great Superchats, contributions. All the action in the live chat was fun to get into. And I’ll see all you guys next week. Take care.

 

[2:48:12]

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/10/2024 = 72)

Rockwell1488Pierce
3 days ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram)! ⚡️⚡️ https://twitter.com/joeldavisx ⚡️⚡️ https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell ⚡️⚡️ https://x.com/b_cottrell89 ⚡️⚡️
8 likes

PhooeyPhoxide
3 days ago
Jeets out, chads in ⚡️⚡️
8 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
3 days ago
[deleted]
-2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
PhooeyPhoxide
3 days ago
In the US, Pajeetas want nordics men. Why marry a rich Indian man when you can marry a rich bwc ?
-1 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
ADC789
3 days ago
[deleted]
0 likes
PhooeyPhoxide
2 days ago
Indians have virtually always had a numerical advantage over anybody they came across, however, they were always defeated even in their own homeland. This is genetic, they are physically inferior and have an average IQ of 70 you can’t change that. If I’m wrong, then why does 1000 years of history prove me right?
1 like
PhooeyPhoxide
2 days ago
Sorry that was kinda mean
0 likes
katana17
3 days ago
[Joel Davis – Analysing the Implications of the Pajeet Hate Surge – Aug 29, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/02/joel-davis-analysing-the-implications-of-the-pajeet-hate-surge-aug-29-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the following: • The show starts late. Tom is sick and absent. • They discuss a viral Twitter account @BarryStantonGBP posting racist content. • World Bank halted Twitter advertising due to ads appearing under racist posts. • They debate whether extreme racist content is more effective propaganda than moderate messaging. • Blair says “emotion, not reason, is really the essence of good propaganda.” • They discuss how racist memes and posts are going viral on Twitter recently. • Joel argues this shows people prefer “morally offensive, distasteful, visceral propaganda.” • They talk about Indians being an easy target for racism due to lack of sympathy for them. • Blair shares negative experiences with Indian people, like noise pollution and poor customer service. • They discuss the “Indian mating strategy” and comment about Indian appearance. • Joel says Indians have a “depraved, horny nature” needed to “perpetuate that disgusting race.” • They talk about protests by immigrants in Melbourne demanding permanent visas. • Similar protests by Indian students in Canada are mentioned. • They discuss how immigration is becoming a bigger political issue in Australia. • Joel says “our political issues are winning out” as immigration concern rises. • They talk about Telegram founder Pavel Durov being arrested in France. • Blair says Durov is in a “precarious position” after his arrest. • They speculate on whether Elon Musk could face similar issues traveling to Europe. • Joel shares stories of being recognized in public, mostly positively but a few negative encounters. • Blair recounts three incidents of being confronted by people who ..
6 likes

Delete
› Show 1 reply
katana17
3 days ago
Book – The Myth of German Villainy by Benton Bradberry – Part 01 https://katana17.com/2016/10/01/book-the-myth-of-german-villainy-by-benton-bradberry-part-01/ Complete book in 22 Parts
5 likes

Delete
EarthlingCarl
3 days ago
That Darryl Cooper guy will never name the Jew. He knows where the line is.
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
GaiusAlexander
14 hours ago
You’re correct. but he basically named them without naming them in the way that he describes the power structures of the modern world. when some normie can acknowledge that that stucture is there, they’ll inevitably see their commonalities.
1 likes

MelancholyMonkey
3 days ago
Good, much-needed haircut, Joel.
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago
[deleted]
0 likes

SunkToTheNutz
3 days ago
Part 1- Checking in from the Pacific Northwest, USA. Appreciate the work all three of you are doing for the White cause as well as admire the personal risk you take in speaking up publicly in today’s Orwellian-like Oz on Whites’ behalf. BUT— I have to address something Joel said at around 1:44:30 in this podcast and I’ve heard Thomas mention at various times before on other streams. I say the following with full respect and am in no way attacking you guys. To be clear, I’m coming from a good faith place as a hardcore Pro-White male who has children, is acutely in tune with Gen Z, Millennials, Gen-X and Boomer generations— the notion that you’re legitimately going to be able to fully bring normies/Conservatives/Republicans, etc into the Pro-White space is utterly obliterated by your need to constantly utilize Hitler quotes, imagery, swastikas, roman salutes, etc. Regardless of whether what AH said was righteous, you and Thom’s insistence on openly glorifying him in such an overt, direct manner is an absolute dealbreaker for most average Americans.
4 likes

SunkToTheNutz
3 days ago
Part 2- This is simply a bridge too far. I’m loathe to acknowledge this but it’s just flat-out untenable, Joel. I’m sorry to be the bearer of the unfortunate reality and wish it wasn’t so, but I would stake literally EVERYTHING I own on this fact! Sure, you’ll have a VERY small percentage of disaffected young fringe Whites that will get on board but for the overwhelming majority of otherwise pissed off White allies that ascribe to virtually every other Pro-White, anti immigration, pro race-realist, Anti-Zionist/Jewish power, anti-trans/poofmeister/CRT/DEI indoctrination, etc that you espouse, open AH worship is simply never gonna fly. That said, if, as I believe, we’re all on the same team with our ultimate goals of some sort of White ethnostate, it seems to me that to actually GET THERE is of utmost importance. We need to build the solid foundation, infiltrate into all the current institutions and dismantle them from the inside out rendering them impotent so over time we can recreate them both internally and with our White allies on the outside. We will NOT be able to facilitate this with openly championing AH, it’s just not possible. Again, I’ve discussed this long running operational dilemma within my vast circles for years, and myself, and all our senior NARoC members are in agreement. These are the times we’re in Joel, we’ve gotta adapt and do whatever we can to WIN! We’ll have plenty of time AFTER we run the show for AH celebration. It’s imperative we’re in power FIRST. 🫡 gonorthwest.info
4 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
DanaS1488
2 days ago
Hitler’s accurate assessment of the JP should not be downloaded nor ignored. Realizing he was correct is integral to the movement and disspelling the myth of the holocaust is equally important bc it removes their ability to use it as a cudgel to beat us into submission.
0 likes

Mland5
2 days ago
Winning outright is the only option. If we have to coop the cuck christians to have a chance, I say we are better to go down in a blaze of glory. What you likely haven’t figured out yet is that ChristInsanity is jewish, and most white nationalists are christians. We are better off growing slowly over the next 50 to 100 years than to hitch up with jews who don’t even know they are jews.
-1 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
SunkToTheNutz
2 days ago
Respectfully, not sure where you got the notion that I suggested we ‘hitch up with Christian jews’? The WN group I’m has the ethnostate is THE overriding principle NOT any religion. Furthermore, most of the members in our group are either atheists, Odinists or Catholics and not remotely some fraudulent crypto-Jews, or ANY type of Jew for that matter.
0 likes

th3ist
3 days ago
Darryl Cooper is DOD weapons inspector. So there are gov agents that are genuinely revisionists? Or is there something else going on
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
rg0dfrey
6 hours ago
Is he still working there?
0 likes

MelancholyMonkey
3 days ago
Aussies represent a wonderful bulwark and stronghold of our precious Anglo culture.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
3 days ago
[deleted]
1 like

Relikt
3 days ago
Tucker isn’t pro white he is pro competence like the rest of the PayPal Mafia, they just don’t like woke because it isnt efficient. They are benefitting us incidentally. But aren’t onside. Still good, we just need to use him and not be used.
2 likes

HKW
3 days ago
First of all, WW2 was about the creation of the terrorist, zionist state of israel !
2 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
Sinagoglies
1 day ago
No – it started with WW1 to prepare for the soviet satellite state of fake Israel. WW1 -Aussie lighthorseman sacrificed for fake Soviet IsraHELL! Bible Reveals One World Order Will Fail. Globalists + Antichrist are set against Nature and God. Catholic priest (whose mum is Aussie) explains from 19:00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz1sAcK1ShE
0 likes

ADC789
2 days ago
[Show low scored comment]
-2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
holgermolger
2 days ago
Funny how the whole country supported a crazy person, huh?
0 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
ADC789
2 days ago
[deleted]
0 likes
HKW
1 day ago
they got hypnotized by Hitler speeches and his promises of great Germany, and blindly followed like today many have complied believing in this fake pandemic. People are so naive …
0 likes
southdublinzoomer
2 days ago
Great stream lads, the future is ours.
2 likes

Se7enius
3 days ago
apparently white world population went from 1/3rd to 1/5th by ww2
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
3 days ago
Heard it said today German white male was at the very least partly obliterated via Russian rape of German women during fall of Berlin & subsequent capture of East Berlin. Check out the modern German male’s phenotypes and their relation to aforementioned install of Asiatic russians particularly, into the Overthrow of eastern Germany including Berlin, during end of WW2 and thereafter. I’ve heard Tom Sewell speak of parallel racial tragedies emanating from WW1.
1 like

‹ Hide 2 replies
palacepony
Supporter
3 days ago
Said by Cooper
0 likes

ADC789
3 days ago
[deleted]
-1 likes

palacepony
Supporter
3 days ago
Joel zooming in nicely on the transfer of influence in Australia out of Britain thence into American Jewry post WW2
1 like

ADC789
3 days ago
[deleted]
1 like

ADC789
3 days ago
[deleted]
1 like

› Show 2 replies
MagicManInTheSky
2 days ago
Time to squeeze the Juice (Jews) out.
1 like

PeroErcegovac
1 day ago
Tucker Carlson is a gatekeeper. His father was former CIA head of Radio Freedom Europe. Now the question is was his father a double agent as Tucker certainly is not NS nor pro West, he is a shill for Putin and Eurasian communism. Let Tucker do what he wants but all true NS should avoid him with a very large stick and just do their own things.
1 like

masklophobix
1 day ago
I have never believed the holocaust. I remember being skeptical as a child. All we were told is that Hitler simply hated the jews and that’s why he killed 6 million of them – in every documentary and every movie. One day I put my hand up in class and asked the teacher “WHY did Hitler hate the jews though?” and I was told that Hitler loved his mother very much and one day she got sick and her jewish doctor couldn’t save her life and from that day Hitler was incensed that her life couldn’t be saved and that why he hated all the jews. And I thought that was the most ridiculous reason ever.
1 like

HKW
3 days ago
The replacement of the European White population came much, much later, which was planned long ago by the zionist group. Hitler was a British stooge.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago
[deleted]
-1 likes

HKW
3 days ago
How do you know what the real TRUTH is ???
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago
[deleted]
0 likes

HKW
3 days ago
Rothschilds originated from Germany and the surname originally was somewhat different.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago
[deleted]
0 likes

ADC789
3 days ago
[deleted]
0 likes

ADC789
2 days ago
[deleted]
0 likes

EnglandAwake
2 days ago
Joes got awesome takes, but a shit beard. A 7-8 to a skin fade at the ears is the best and it needs to be blended half way down.
0 likes

FSJT60
2 days ago
Bee Sieg Hail. 😁 Love it!
0 likes

katana17
2 days ago
[Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/07/joel-davis-wwii-revisionism-re-enters-the-mainstream-sep-6-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the recent Tucker Carlson interview with American historian Darryl Cooper and how he considers: “The real bad guy of World War Two was Churchill.” Points include: • They view the interview as a watershed moment for mainstreaming revisionist narratives. • “This is the re-mainstreaming for the first time in that I can remember in living memory of World War two revisionism.” • Cooper’s approach is a “humanitarian” and “honest” way to discuss controversial topics. • Discuss Churchill’s role in WWII, with Cooper calling him “the foremost villain” of the war. • Explore the idea of having “Nuremberg-style trials” for those responsible for mass immigration. • Discuss the importance of World War II revisionism in understanding current political issues. “World War two really is the datum point from which all perspective of the present day is forged.” • They share their personal journeys into World War II revisionism and White nationalism. • Discuss the impact of reading Mein Kampf and other revisionist materials. “Reading Mein Kampf and learning the truth about world War two breaks the spell of Holocaustianity.” • World War II narratives are central to current anti-White ideologies. • Discuss the challenges of promoting revisionist views
in mainstream discourse. • The importance of ideological purity in their movement. “Maximum ideological purity can actually disadvantage you because it means you’re going to piss people off, alienate people.” • They discuss the role of social media and online activism in spreading their ideas. • Share anecdotes about discussing their views
in everyday situations. • Talk about recruitment and the growing …
0 likes

Delete
easymoneyshooters
2 days ago
Great fuckin episode !!
0 likes

palacepony
Supporter
2 days ago
Idea for sausage (show title idea)- ‘Bees throwing Romans’.
0 likes

palacepony
Supporter
2 days ago
Ironic how Hitler is ridiculed re artistic pursuit by the Yew gno Hew media. Churchill was a watercolour painter of what I consider some real talent. If it is true he was a forger, then that was a talent wasted.
0 likes

EternalReich
1 day ago
It really hasn’t entered the mainstream at all. The mainstream white population at large don’t even care about their annihilation taking place. It’s impossible to not be blackpilled. Now I see why Christianity is so compelling
0 likes

PeroErcegovac
1 day ago
I like your show but saying that US manufacturing is shit? You have no idea how powerful and advanced is America in the most important industry in the world… the military industry, which NASA is part of. Do not fall so readily for Russian and Chinese propaganda. Both those countries are shitholes that cannot produce anything reliable.
0 likes

ArthurRimbaud3
Supporter
1 day ago
Maybe Jim Jones is our guy after all
0 likes

ZRWJ
Supporter
1 day ago
The Americans imposed an embargo on Japan because the Japanese invaded French Indochina. France, of course, being an American ally and a fellow white nation.
0 likes

Truthseekerchuck
1 day ago
Love what you guys are doing. Sending support from North Carolina, USA.
0 likes

Sinagoglies
1 day ago
British and American White slavery https://www.amazon.com.au/White-Cargo-Forgotten-History-Britains/dp/0814742963 Jews were banned from England in 1290 and not allowed back until Oliver Cromwell lifted the ban in 1656. The Rothschild British Empire: Roman Catholic Guy Fawkes The Start Of The Warnings! Father Of Anonymous! How did England deal with a corrupt puritan government/parliament? http://politicalvelcraft.org/anonymous/ White Slavery In Australia (The Fatal Shore) https://www.bitchute.com/video/iwA3jLcSQxAd https://www.amazon.com.au/White-Cargo-Forgotten-History-Britains/dp/0814742963 https://virily.com/culture/irish-slaves-in-the-americas/ The Judeo-Masonic roots of the US founding fathers and the Constitution Freemasonry, hatched in the British Empire following the Enlightenment-Rosicrucian revolutionary overthrow of the Catholic Church in England, is the proxy arm of the international Jewish conspiracy against Christ and His Saints. Throughout the centuries, the Jewish conspirators have struggled to refrain from publicly gloating of their engineering of this proxy movement. Jews have entirely created Masonry to corrupt the nations of Christian civilization and to propagate behind this veil the general revolution which is to bring about the domination of Israel. It is simply a tool and a means in the hands of the Jews. In support of this, we can quote the article of Dr. Isaac M. Wise published in the Israelite of America, 3 August, 1866: ‘Masonry is a Jewish institution, whose history, degrees, charges, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.’[I] This conspiracy to “corrupt the nations” was executed under the cover of “Enlightenment” progress and freedom. The Masonic Illuminati slogan is “liberty, fraternity, and equality”, which was shouted from rooftops as revolutionaries raped, pillaged, and murdered their way through France. https://fitzinfo.net/2014/02/26/alex-jones-freemasonry-and-the-cult-of-constitution/
0 likes

Sinagoglies
1 day ago
ISLAM AND JudeoMasonic PROTESTANT COLLABORATIONS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism_and_Islam Judaizers: https://slife.org/protestantism-and-islam/ Why The Crusades Were Awesome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aFkoX6g1fE http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/Islam_and_Protestantism HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Following the Turkish conquest of Constantinople in 1453 by Mehmet II and the unification of the Middle Eastunder Selim I, Suleiman the Magnificent, the son of Selim, managed to expand Ottoman rule to Balkans. The Habsburg Empire thus entered into direct conflict with the Ottomans. At the same time the Protestant Reformation was taking place in numerous areas of northern and central Europe, in harsh opposition to Papal authority and the Holy Roman Empire led by Emperor Charles V. This situation led the Protestants to consider various forms of cooperation and rapprochement (religious, commercial, military) with the Muslim world, in opposition to their common Habsburg enemy. EARLY RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION (15TH–17TH CENTURIES) During the development of the Reformation, Protestantism and Islam were considered closer to each other than they were to Catholicism: “Islam was seen as closer to Protestantism in banning images from places of worship, in not treating marriage as a sacrament and in rejecting monastic orders”.[1] Relief statues in the Cathedral of Saint Martin, Utrecht, attacked in Reformation iconoclasm in the 16th century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_Revolt#/media/File:UtrechtIconoclasm.jpg Anglo-Turkish piracy Main article: Anglo-Turkish piracy After peace was made with Catholic Spain in 1604, English pirates nevertheless continued to raid Christian shipping in the Mediterranean, this time under the protection of the Muslim rulers of the Barbary States, and often converting to Islam in the process, in what has been described as Anglo-Turkish piracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turco-Calvinism cont..
0 likes

KINGMAGNUSMUISC
1 day ago
I have both volumes in hardcover – Dalton. Cannot recommend enough
0 likes

ADC789
23 hours ago
[deleted]
0 likes

rg0dfrey
6 hours ago
Well I’ll tell you boys… there are more sympathizers than ever
0 likes

rg0dfrey
6 hours ago
Alright boys no bickering
0 likes

rg0dfrey
5 hours ago
You fools gotta get into the same studio guys come on.
0 likes

drcheese1987
4 hours ago
the forbidden grape drank
0 likes

drcheese1987
37 minutes ago
small Chuchill defence, he yeeted a hell of a lot of Pajeets in the Bengal Famine, so he’s not all bad
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript