Joel Davis: No Blair tonight. It is the 3rd of October 2024. Blair’s got some things that came up. He couldn’t do the show. Blair and I might do a stream, though, maybe Sunday night or something to make up for that, but nevertheless, gotta have a show for you guys this evening, and you got a show with Tom and I, so should be good. There’s a lot to discuss. It’s been an interesting week in global politics, at least, you know, things to Israel, European politics, etcetera. Yes, some interesting things I wanted to discuss.

 

So there’s a lot on the agenda.

 

First of all, I guess, like a place to start would be, we could talk about, obviously, things have kicked off where Israel about a week ago, they did a pretty extensive bombing campaign in Lebanon. They managed to take out the leadership of Hezbollah with that bombing campaign.

 

And then they did a, I don’t know if you would call it an invasion, but they went over the border into Lebanon and they’re doing, their military is active fighting Hezbollah within Lebanon as we speak.

 

And obviously what made a lot of news was the fact that Iran sent over a shitload of ballistic missiles into Israel. They blew up a few, I think, air bases and some other things inside Israel, Israeli air defenses, which are state of the art, thanks to American taxpayers, weren’t able to intercept, because they Iran has hypersonics. I think that they got them from the Russians or something that are pretty, like high tech.

 

So the situation is pretty heavy. Shit has kind of escalated from just what it was for the past year, where it was just a kind of war in Gaza against Hamas. Now it’s going to the next level. And this really shouldn’t be something that we’re that concerned with, but it is something that we should be concerned with purely for the reason that there is a sequence where this keeps escalating to the point that you get an American intervention, and if there’s an American intervention, that could escalate into a full on war in the region with Iran. Or maybe they deployed troops to fight Hezbollah, maybe war kicks off in Syria, and that could also rope in Australians as well. We’d probably send troops if something like that happened. And that is quite concerning.

 

Obviously, we don’t want to expend any White blood for fucking jews, particularly after the shit show that was Iraq. We don’t want a repeat of that. And I think this time around it would probably be more brutal.

 

So that’s on the horizon. I’m not predicting a war. I think it’s a low percentage chance, but it’s nevertheless a possibility. And I think what’s also interesting about this is the way that there’s a reaction within the domestic politics of Western countries. Like, let’s bring it back to Australia. We’ve seen a lot of the Zionist conservative element be very forceful. There were protests in Sydney. People were waving Hezbollah flags. And some Arab chick was charged with terrorism offences for waving a Hezbollah flag. It’s illegal in Australia to support a listed terrorist organisation. I think they can actually use maybe the same legislation or similar legislation to what they’ve used to ban NSDAP symbols to go after them specifically for the Hezbollah symbols. I’m not so sure about that. Might be different legislation, but anyway, it’s relevant.

 

The point is its pretty testy. Peter Dutton has been out and very forceful in defense of jews, in defense of Israel, holding the Left’s feet to the fire on the issue. And we’ve seen a lot of Zionists that align themselves with the political Right in this country, basically coming out demanding that the Muslims are deported. Not all Muslims, necessarily, but any Muslims that participate in any of these anti-Israel protests.

 

And so that’s quite interesting to kind of break down and analyze. And even, like, Drew Pavlou, who apparently was on the left, and when I debated him, he’s like a wholesome chungus, you know, multiracialist now. He’s almost, like, sounding like hard Right. Because that’s how much he shills for Israel.

 

So it’s kind of interesting to dissect the hypocrisy of that, I think, and analyze it where it’s incredible how the conservative movement can organise so staunchly in defense of jewish interests and the jews.

 

But, you know, crickets when it comes to White Australians, actual Australians. And what concerns us and what the fuck does Israel have to do with Australia? Like, seriously, like, it obviously has nothing to do with Australia. It’s just jewish capture, jewish elite capture of our political institutions.

 

So what do you think about this, Tom? I see you made some comments on Twitter, but how do you kind of take in the whole situation?

 

[05:12]

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, a lot has happened. A lot has happened, but nothing has really impacted our lives at this stage. I did notice that in the US there has been a hurricane, or a flood of some sort that’s damaged a lot of people, and that’s been all over my timeline. And something that I think should be said is its so obvious. Well, I’ll give a bit more information. The National Guard is being deployed to the Middle East at the moment. And the National Guard is meant to be a line of defense for what we did when I was in the army, neo-SAS operations like non-combative evacuation operations, security and stability operations. It’s not really meant to be deployed to war zones. It’s more for like, domestic affairs. And this is the one time where it should be really, a lot of resources should be going into helping these people. But they’re sending billions to Israel for missiles. And their readiness level for their soldiers is not to help their own families but to go overseas. And I saw some screenshots from text messages from people saying, like, active service people in the US saying that they:

 

“Couldn’t go home, they couldn’t get leave to help their families or help their neighbourhoods because they’ve got to be on standby to get the Middle East because of what’s happening.”

 

So this is some collapse of Rome stuff. And I’m not saying that this is what is about to happen. I’m just saying that this general attitude that the US government has towards its people and all governments, all White governments or traitor governmentss have towards White people, they’re teetering on the edge of mutinies, mass mutinies! I’m not saying it’s going to be a mutiny overnight, but this behaviour leads to mutinies. You have to let people, soldiers and civic minded people, you have to let them clean up their homes first before they can go overseas and fight.

 

And yeah, there’s just a general zeitgeist, I think, for Whites globally, that’s very different to when the first Iraq war happened. The zeitgeist back then was quite anti-islamic from just a pure, visceral, you know, guttural dislike for Muslims. I still think that that dislike still exists. And it’s potentially even stronger because of the way Muslims have treated White people over the last, 20 years in our own countries because of the mass migration. I think that feeling still exists. But what it’s not paired with which it was definitely even as a weaker feeling, paired with a stronger sense of going over there and kicking some arse.

 

So when 9/11* happened [an Israeli false flag – Kat] and the 7/7 bombings in the UK and these terrorist attacks in the early 2010s, there was a huge civic patriot, anti-Islam movement to go overseas and kill hajis. And it was as explicit as that. I was in the army and probably 90% of the guys I was in the army with, that was their main reason for joining. It was they want to go to Afghanistan or Iraq and kill Muslims, like, for what they’ve done to the basically to Western civilisation. They weren’t really there to just like, get a meal ticket. That there was like, a racial, a subconscious racial mindedness to do it. I don’t think that exists anymore to. At the same capacity. It still exists, but I don’t think it’s anywhere near as strong as it once was, because there’s so many factors. I won’t even go into it. But it was good to see Israel getting bombed by some proper ballistic missiles. That was awesome to see.

 

 

[* See: The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT]

 

And I think a lot of people get caught up not saying that you’ve done this, Joel. I think you introduced the topic very well, but I have seen a lot of discourse online where people are saying that:

 

“Everything’s a psyop, nothing ever happens. Israel let themselves get bombed!”

 

And this was probably discussed on an earlier show. It’s like, that’s the wrong attitude. Why do we always have these people acting as if Israel and the jews are some omnipotent force? Yes, they’re very powerful! Yes, they have a completely disproportionate amount of power. Yes, they own the US government, they own the Senate, they own Congress, like, through AIPAC and the Federal Reserve and the media. But sometimes they actually can take a punch, you know what I mean? Sometimes a missile gets through and actually hits something and people saying oh, like there’s a lot of black pill. Whenever something happens, I don’t want to get too excited, obviously, because Israel’s been bombed a lot of times.

 

But, you know, Iran stepping up, when I saw it in my newsfeed, when it said that Iran is basically declaring a state of war and they sent those missiles, I thought to myself:

 

“Wow, I can sleep a bit better tonight. At least they’re doing something. [chuckling] That’s great!”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When I would say, though. So followed it kind of closely, and I think Iran didn’t declare war on Israel directly. They bombed them. Yes. And you’re correct that the jews didn’t let the bomb get through. That was jewish cope. They actually blocked out on Google Maps or whatever the satellite footage, like the Israeli bases that got bombed so that you couldn’t see the damage from the satellite imaging. So why cover it up? And they said initially:

 

“Oh, everything’s fine. No one died and everything’s fine. They just killed one Palestinian. Ha ha, idiots!”

 

But then now the truth is coming out. And no, actually the missiles did do some damage. But at the same time, I mean just from a geographical standpoint, like Iran, it’s very difficult for them to do much to Israel because just for geographical distance, like there’s Iraq and Syria between them and Israel.

 

And so it’s a long fucking way! I don’t know if Iran even has carrier ships for their air force, but they wouldn’t be able to use them even if they did because the Americans are sitting there with their much better navy and much better air force kind of as a check on much of what they can do.

 

So, yeah, they can lob some missiles at Israel from a distance and blow up a few things. And that’s good optics for them. And it does restrain Israeli behaviour. And I saw that the French and the British basically said to the Americans and to Israel:

 

“We don’t want you to respond. We’re not going to back you if you respond, you’re on your own.”

 

Kind of thing. They don’t want to see an escalation.

[12:22]

And so I think Iran, they kind of played a strategic hand here. They thought that maybe because Israel is kind of in a precarious situation, it’s tied up, they can lob a few in and maybe get away with it and not get much of a retaliation. But if they were to continue doing it and continue escalating, it would get to a point where the US military would be brought in to then bomb the shit out of Iran in defense of Israel. Like, Israel can wear a few of these and be told by the Americans to wear a few of these. But if they keep escalating, keep escalating, keep escalating, there’s a point at which the jews can pull the strings in ZOG to make America bomb the shit out of Iran. And Iran, I think, is aware of that.

 

So it’s a little bit of an optics game where they want to look like they’re standing up to Israel and they have like, one strategic capacity, which are these long range, like, hypersonic ballistic missiles, but there’s a limited strategic benefit to them.

 

What is interesting, though, is that going into Lebanon, like, there was a lot of hype last week when Israel took out the leaders of Lebanon with their own bombing campaign, which showed that they had really good intelligence because they were able to pinpoint where the leaders were and take them out with aerial bombing. But Hezbollah are, like, 100,000 men, and it’s a guerrilla war.

 

So if they’re going to go into Lebanon, what are they going to do? Occupy all of Lebanon and systematically uncover 100,000 men and execute all of them? That’s totally unrealistic military operation.

 

So they can go in skirmish, try and do some damage to Hezbollah, try and use intelligence to identify where they’re holding some rocket storage facilities or whatever and take them out. But they’re not going to be able to defeat Hezbollah. It’s just not possible. And fighting against the guerrilla enemy with the conventional military is so difficult. Like, the Americans lost in Afghanistan for a reason and in Vietnam for a reason. It’s because, you know, guerrilla technique, when you have the sympathy of the people, creates a disproportionate, like, a massive disproportionate advantage against a conventional occupying force. Conventional force versus conventional force. It’s more of who’s the stronger power will win. But, yeah, with the asymmetric warfare, it’s very, very difficult.

 

And then the longer that this goes on, you have to remember, I had Mike Pinovich on to talk about this because he’s like a spurg about Israel kind of subject. So if you’re interested in his analysis, you can go watch that stream if you haven’t already.

 

But he was making a very accurate point I thought that while all this is going on, Hezbollah are lobbing rockets into Israel. Yeah, like, their rockets aren’t as good as the Israeli rockets or the Iranian rockets, right? But they still blow shit up. They can still kill people. And the jews that live near the Lebanese border, a lot of them, like, have had to evacuate from their homes or if you have businesses in that area that had to shut down.

 

And so there’s millions of jews that are their whole life is on hold while, like, shit is just getting randomly blown up all around them every night. And there’s, like bomb sirens going off all the time, and they’re living in fear. They don’t have a normal life, like a massive portion of the country.

 

And so, like, Israel has a limited window and under which it can conduct this operation. They can’t just go into Lebanon and fight a guerrilla war against Hezbollah for four years, because that means four years of random jews getting their houses blown up in Israel. And that’s just not tolerable. So like, what can Israel realistically do here? Like, they can go in, they can kill some people. A few of them will die. And also, Israel doesn’t have a massive military with a lot of forces. It’s a small country, like in population size.

 

So their high level, like special operations and, like the high quality, high grade fighters, they don’t have a lot. So their strategy has to be either dragging the Americans in, which is going to be difficult, because I think Iran will basically try to push as hard as they can without crossing a line that would drag the Americans in mixed, or basically they can go in and then blow some shit up and declare victory and then go back to Israel. And then Netanyahu probably gets voted out the next election, and the Israeli Left takes control and has a more moderate foreign policy. This whole exercise has just destroyed Israel’s international reputation and pissed off all of their enemies.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s huge protesting at the moment in Israel, huge protesting!

 

So they are in a difficult situation as to how they can escalate this war without escalating, as you said, there’s a huge percentage of, they’re living in what would feel like a war zone, or a prison. And because it is, and they’re locked in. Now, even though they’re not being directly invaded, they’re the difference between the Lebanese or the Palestinians or the Gazans and the jews is the jews are accustomed to a high standard of living, whereas the southern Lebanese, the Gazans and the Palestinians are accustomed to suffering. So they can tolerate a lot of stress and it only strengthens their resolve, whereas the jews actually can’t tolerate that much stress.

 

[17:50]

 

So it’s an effective strategy what Hezbollah and Iran are doing by just keeping them under constant stress without provoking America. That would really be their goal, because obviously provoking America is going to result in the B2 bombers coming over, the Stealth bombers coming over and just bombing Tehran, which is everything that all the power grid’s going to go out. Like, they’re going to try to send Iran back to the Stone Age, which is what all the Hawks in Washington are trying to go for.

 

But there’s obviously two factors at play. There’s the Israeli election and there’s the American election, and I think everything is really in this kind of, it’s not a stalemate, but everything’s in this kind of play on. They’re doing this kind of rigmarole. They’re playing war on the Lebanese border. Like I saw the footage today from the Special Forces soldiers going in. It looks like they wanted to get some. It’s not, as you said, it’s not a full ground invasion. They’re just looking to get in, probe, you know, they’re looking in to get some. And, yeah, they’re not going to get very far with that.

 

Regarding taking out the entire or the vast majority of the Hezbollah leadership. Obviously, the jews have good intel, and they would be leaning entirely, I think, on the Americans. I think the American intel, you know, would be the superior intel. The jews obviously, would have the backdoor to a lot of the Google, and a lot of the kind of modern tech.

 

But I think it’s the American spy network. The Americans just have so many spies on the payroll, and it would just be subcontracted out to. Well, Israel would be subcontracting their workout without paying, obviously. You know, the Americans do it for free.

 

So yeah. I also think it’s interesting that the media or the ABC [state run Australian Broadcasting Corporation], it sounded like they’re trying to defend Hezbollah. It shows you how Left-wing the ABC is when Peter Dutton* was speaking about that girl charged with waving the Hezbollah flag.

 

[* Peter Craig Dutton (born 18 November 1970) is an Australian politician and former police detective serving as the current Leader of the Opposition, holding office as the leader of the Liberal Party of Australia since May 2022. He has been the Member of Parliament (MP) for the division of Dickson since 2001. Dutton previously served as the minister for Defence from 2021 to 2022 and the minister for Home Affairs from 2017 to 2021. He held various ministerial positions from 2004 to 2022 in the governments of Howard, Abbott, Turnbull and Morrison. Dutton grew up in Brisbane. He worked as a police officer in the Queensland Police for nearly a decade upon leaving school, and later ran a construction business with his father. He joined the Liberal Party as a teenager and was elected to the House of Representatives at the 2001 election, aged 30.]

 

Regarding that legislation, I’m fairly certain that when they made the recent amendment, they took out the ISIS flag, because originally the ISIS flag was on that amendment as a banneed, like as a designated sort of terror symbol. And they took it off, added the swastika and the double-sig runes, specifically the double-sig runes [SS symbol]. But I can’t remember whether they included the Hezbollah flag in that legislation. But I do know in previous legislation, they named, I think, two random, like, I think was like, Atomwaffen and Sonnenkrieg Division, which was like a Finnish Discord chat as, like the two neo-Nazi groups that were designated terror groups. Yeah, Sonnenkrieg Division isn’t real. It’s like, I think it was like a 15 year old on Discord that had a few, like, international people on it, and I think they just shared BT videos on Discord.

 

So anyway, Sonnenkrieg Division, and I think The Base or Atomwaffen got listed and then there was like seven or eight Islamic groups that were listed, and obviously one of them was Hezbollah. So that would be a separate legislation that would imply the symbolism of Hezbollah would also be designated.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Interesting times.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a pretty brazen thing to do, that girl.

 

I don’t know if you can get that up. Was a Noticer article?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I could probably get it up. I’ll pull it up in a sec.

 

But you know, on the subject I also want to make this take, and I said it actually on social media, but there’s a lot of jews that are coming out now, and we saw this actually, this is a repeat of what we’ve already seen a few times over the past year since shit kicked off between Israel and Hamas last October, where the jews are coming out and calling for deportations. And then that’s just immediately turning on all the conservatives, like:

 

“Yes, yes! Deportations! Oh, my God, let’s get these browns out!”

 

Because, it’s like they’re getting a licence to express their inner racism. But the jews have been saying this for a year, and the jews have a lot of political power in this country. If they really wanted a deportation plan to be seriously implemented, they’re like think tanks and NGO’s and so on would push them very heavily in a systematic way. But we haven’t seen any of that.

 

I feel like a lot of the leading jews, like, I’m sure like a lot of jews just like Zionist sympathizers want these people deported. I don’t doubt that.

 

But I think a lot of the leading jews realise that having these pro-Hamas, pro-Hezbollah, pro-Palestine browns protesting on the streets is actually a great look for them and helps get the sympathy of conservatives on their side because they can play into White racism and they can say:

 

“Hey, look at these fucking browns! They shouldn’t be in our country. They don’t share our values!”

 

And then immediately, I can feel it. You’re like:

 

“Yeah, let’s get these browns out!”

 

And I agree with deporting them, of course, because they’re brown. But I also want the jews deported. I mean, when they say that their terrorist sympathizers. Well, when has Hezbollah committed a terrorist attack against Australia or any terrorist attack against the British Empire, against us? I don’t think that’s ever happened. Someone can quote, if I’m wrong, let me know.

 

But I don’t think that’s ever happened. Israel has committed terrorist attacks against us [yeah 9/11 for example – Kat]. In fact, that’s how the state of Israel came into fucking existence in the first place, through terrorist attacks. And that is land that was won, by the way, by Australian blood. We went in World War One and we fought the Ottoman Empire, and Churchill fucked us over and sent us into the beaches of Gallipoli. And how many men did we lose in that complete fuck up by Churchill in World War One?

 

Thomas Sewell: I think about 8,000.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we fought basically for that land. That was like our land as the British Empire.

 

And then the jews committed terrorism against us and stole it!

 

[24:24]

 

Thomas Sewell: King David Hotel.* They killed like a dozen or more.

 

[* The British administrative headquarters for Mandatory Palestine, housed in the southern wing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, were bombed in a terrorist attack on 22 July 1946, by the militant Right-wing Zionist underground organisation Irgun during the Jewish insurgency. Ninety-one people of various nationalities were killed, including Arabs, Britons and Jews, and 46 were injured. Wikipedia]

 

 

[See: The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT]

 

Joel Davis: In multiple acts.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, yeah, there was a lot. Well, I think the first. Was it Perez? Was he the first president or prime minister? I think Perez or one of the first. They’ve all got strange jewy names, but one of the first prime ministers or the first prime minister was actually the head of one of the terrorist wings.

 

So it’s the same situation as, like, Nelson Mandela being the head of the ANC terror wing.

 

Joel Davis: There’s some idiot in the chat here. He said:

 

“You didn’t fight for Israeli land, you muppets.”

 

Yeah, in World War One we fought the Ottoman Empire and the Ottoman Empire controlled what is, like Palestine. And then Palestine became under the control of the British Empire.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Syria, I think, became part of Syria, and Lebanon, I think, became part of France. Like, the French controlled that part and the British got Palestine.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s just the history of it.

 

Thomas Sewell: There was a transfer agreement. The British Zionists made a deal to transfer all the European jews, or not all of them, but the vast majority of European jews in 1933 into British Palestine. Which Hitler even supported.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the Havara agreement. I mean, that made sense. Like, it was a way to get the jews out of Germany. You know, I would gladly deport all of our jews to Israel tomorrow if we could.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, yes!

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, like, anyway, the point is that supporting Israel is actually supporting an entity that came into being through terrorism, against us. So is it rich when the jews are trying to morally grandstand about terrorism? It’s like:

 

“Okay, so you care about terrorism when it’s against you, even though you committed it against us historically!”

 

And also the only reason that these fucking browns are even here in the fucking first place is because you conspired to destroy the White Australia Policy! Like, jews, like, jewish groups infiltrated the Australian government and systematically attacked the White Australia Policy from the fifties to the seventies and were instrumental in its deconstruction because they felt that they basically were the odd man out in Australia.

 

We didn’t even want them here! There was barely any jews here before World War Two, they then snuck in against our will, largely through, you know, larping as Greeks and Italians. And there were a bunch of American based, like, jewish organisations that funded and facilitated jewish migration to Australia. The jewish diaspora sets up shop here. Immediately, all the communist jews, like, infiltrate our government and start sending all of our state secrets to the Soviet Union.

 

So then we had to create ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] because we had a high trust Anglo society before that. We didn’t even need ASIO. And then leading jewish community groups were like:

 

“Well, we should try and turn this into a multicultural country, open up the borders, end the White Australia Policy, because everyone else in this country are White Christians and we’re jews! And so if we don’t, like, crowd them out with some other minorities, you know what’s going to stop them turning around and looking at us as the odd man out and wanting us out on at some particular point in the future?”

 

And they explicitly said this, more or less like, I’m paraphrasing. So it’s pretty rich when getting lectured by the jews on all this shit!

 

But anyway, like, I digress. I think when you get these calls from a lot of these jewish leaders, it’s a little bit of a bait and switch. They kind of throw the carrot out of kosher racism. And it’s a way to get conservatives to emotionally side with Israel and the only democracy in the Middle East and kind of view jews as White. Like, I saw this clip of Barry Weiss. I think she was doing a podcast with Douglas Murray or something that Keith Woods posted it, like, a couple hours ago on Twitter. Maybe it was only an hour ago, actually, because I just saw it before we went live. And she was sitting down and they were talking about, she’s an American Zionist, by the way, a high, high ranking Zionist jew in the United States. And she was talking about how, like:

 

“Oh, the Qataris have infiltrated America. They’ve infiltrated our sports teams, our education system, our media, and they’re subverting American society!”

 

And it’s like:

 

“You did that! Like, worst. Like, you literally took over the whole fucking country!”

 

But so, like, jews are now just going to pretend like they’re White because it’s suiting them to make Whites identify with Israel.

 

But then when it comes to White issues that directly face us or we talk about, well, rather than deporting people from our country because they upset jews, what about because they upset Whites? Well, then jews freak out!:

 

“That’s literally Hitler! You’re going to commit a “Holocaust”. How dare you? As a jew, White people can’t be allowed to think like that.”

 

So then they magically are not White. So they’re like Schrodinger’s White Guy*, they just flip-flop based upon how it suits them. They’re just subversive scum.

 

[* In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger’s cat is a thought experiment concerning quantum superposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical cat may be considered simultaneously both alive and dead, while it is unobserved in a closed box, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. This experiment viewed this way is described as a paradox. Wikipedia.]

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly!

 

[29:34]

 

Joel Davis: You know, just today, like, Australia’s richest jew, Triguboff came out and we need more immigration, apparently. Apparently like the ridiculously high record historical immigration into Australia that’s caused a housing crisis, and he’s jacking up the crime rate and ruining Australian society. It’s not enough immigrants for him. He wants even more! And who’s going to win? Because we’ve got 74% of the country in a recent poll saying they oppose immigration, we’ve got one richest jew in Australia that supports it. Which way do you think the government’s going to go? Because apparently we live in a democracy. I think the government’s probably going to go with the rich jew!

 

So what does that say?

 

 

[See: https://www.noticer.news/harry-triguboff-demands-immigration-increase/]

Thomas Sewell: He’s been doing that forever, though. He’s made all his billions of mass immigration.

 

So they’re not exactly unbiased sources of public discourse, are they? They’re profiting from it. I mean, you obviously know that, but it’s important for the public to be aware that everyone that advocates for it is either a traitor or they’re profiting from it, or both.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, he’s like Australia’s wealthiest property developer, so of course he wants mass immigration, not just is it crowding out the White demographic but, it’s kind of inflating the housing market. So when he creates these big high rise apartments everywhere, there’s all these jeets to pack into them.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, he was complaining last year about how many of them were empty and how he needed to raise immigration. So they just build them. They build them and no one’s even in them yet. They’re not even 50% sold, but they just keep building.

 

And then they build the next one, and they haven’t even sold off the first one yet and they just keep building. And he went and lobbied the government and I don’t remember the exact conversation and obviously I wasn’t there and it wasn’t documented. But the article that I read that discussed the conversation that he had with the government when he spoke to them was:

 

“Who’s going to buy these apartments? I built them all and now they’re just sitting empty. Who’s going to buy these apartments, you need to raise the immigration level.”

 

So it’s absolutely disgusting!

 

Joel Davis: He’s one of the biggest campaign contributors to the Liberal Party and the Labor Party, by the way. And yeah, he’s been advocating for big Australia immigration policy for decades in a very prominent way with the property lobby and other lobby groups, pro-immigration lobby groups. So, yeah, that’s how it works.

 

But this is a bit of a digression, but I think it’s an important digression because when we’re talking about the Israel issue, like Blair said last week, it was kind of provocative. I think Blair said words to the effect of:

 

“I don’t care if Israel go in and genocide a million Palestinians tomorrow, and I don’t give a shit if Hamas invades Israel and gas a million jews tomorrow, it’s not my fucking problem!”

 

And I agree with that sentiment. It isn’t our fucking problem! But it’s made our problem because of the fact that they’re here in our fucking country!

 

So now we have to deal with it on the basis of what’s in, and also that the jews are trying to drag us into it as well and fight their wars for them. So that’s what makes it our problem.

 

And so I think there’s a pro-White perspective here. It’s like, I don’t really give a shit about. I don’t want to have to give a shit about it, but I’m forced to because of their presence here, their parasitism, their subversion of my society. And that’s where I differentiate from., … There’s certain elements in the movement that have this view:

 

“That we should really focus upon the plight of the poor Palestinians and waving Iranian flags and supporting the struggle of browns against Israel because they will pull on the heartstrings of Whites. They like an underdog, and they’ll come around and support the enemies of Israel, and it will help them to see the problem with zionism and with jews.”

 

And I just fundamentally disagree with that approach. I think that’s already basically the mainstream position of the Left. And all of them see Israel as a kind of evil, kind of they almost see it as White and as, like a Western settler colonial project, much like Australia. And they hate it for the same reasons that they hate Australia or they hate America, insofar as it’s, like, a White dominated country.

 

So I don’t believe in that kind of universalistic, like, moralism. I think we should just simply assert the fact that as Whites, we want our money, our blood and treasure to be entirely focused upon defending our own fucking people and our own interests and to hell with everybody else! And that’s basically how everyone in the world thinks, except, you know, Whites that have been psyopped into this deranged humanitarianism.

 

And I think the average Australian, like, you can look at opinion polls, do you support Israel? Do you support Palestine? I think the average Australian really doesn’t give a fuck either way. I think only a very small fraction of society really cares either way. And that’s actually natural and healthy because it’s on the other side of the fucking world, and these people have nothing to do with us! Why would they care? Like, if something was happening to a European country, like, if something was happening to Britain or to Germany or to the United States, then, yeah, of course we would care because they’re like racial kin. Who the fuck cares about, … I laugh at the jews getting blown up by Iranian bombs, but I don’t really care about what’s going on there personally.

 

I think the messaging has to be, how does it affect Australians? How does it affect Whites in general? You said before the stream that you didn’t see because Keith Woods debated. I can’t, but this guy’s name. His name was Daniel. It’s like some Muslim guy who lives in America, Daniel, some fucking, like, gibberish, right? He’s got some gibberish, fucking, you know, brown, like, Arabic name or something. I don’t know exactly where he’s from. But they were debating White nationalism, and the debate was interesting because Keith Woods was going for this kind of wholesome chungus White nationalism, where he was like:

 

“Hey, look I think we should have White countries for people of European descent, because those are our native lands, and I don’t want our countries to be involved in Middle Eastern politics or imposing ourselves over the Muslim world either. So we’re happy to leave you alone if you leave us alone. So what’s wrong with that?”

 

And what Daniel the Muslim, responded to that with, which I thought was really interesting, was he said:

 

“But if we let Whites have their own countries, what’s going to stop you creating all this super advanced technology, AI, robotics and so on, and then imposing., …”

 

And he literally said:

 

“Whites have higher IQs and they’re better at creating technologies. And what’s going to stop you from creating this satanic technological mega empire that then completely fucks us up. Whereas if we stuff ourselves into your countries now, we can stop you from developing basically, and prevent this kind of like, Faustian runaway where the Whiteman re-ascends to global domination status.”

 

[36:55]

 

And I’ve never heard a brown person ever make that argument before, but it was actually really interesting that he did.

 

And it’s like, I can actually see his point. That actually is a rational position for a brown person to take. I’m sure that’s actually implicit in how a lot of non-Whites think about this. Where the reason why they are so indifferent to our plight, it’s not just because they’re just selfish and only care about their own group. I think it’s because they’re afraid of us. They’re afraid, like right now, the Whiteman is weak and they can smell blood. And it’s like:

 

“We got to take these motherfuckers out now while they’re having their retard moment. Because if they wake up to themselves and go full Hitler mode, we’re fucked! Like, they’re just going to Giga Chad their way over the world again and we’re going to be their bitch!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Mmm.

 

Joel Davis: And they’re not wrong. And Keith Woods can come along and give, like, his wholesome chungus:

 

“No, no, no! We’re nice guys. White people are nice. We just want to have our homelands back. And we respect you if you respect us.”

 

And I can see why the browns aren’t buying it because it actually does kind of smell like bullshit! And the reality is, for every Keith Woods, there’s a Joel Davis or Thomas Sowell or whatever, that if we look, yeah, we are coming for all your shit! If we get back in power, like, of course we are, because someone’s got to run the world. And if we don’t do it, the Chinese are going to do it, or some other group is going to do it. And so the only guarantee against someone else taking over the fucking world is taking it over yourself!

 

So there’s a zero sum kind of reality.

 

And actually Nick Fuentes, like, kind of criticised Keith on this point on his show, and I agreed with his take because he was saying, like:

 

“So what are we going to do? Like, we’re going to take back all of the White countries, and then there’s all of these vital resources, natural resources in Africa, and we kind of need them to advance our civilisation. And we’re going to go to the African tribesmen and be like: ‘Hey, can we have some of your minerals?”

 

 

And then, you know, chief, like I don’t know, some gibberish African name is like:

 

“No, you can’t have it!”

 

And they’ve got like a bunch of sticks and rocks and we’ve got like nuclear weapons and like all this advanced tech, and we’re just going to be like:

 

“Okay, you’re right to self-determination. You can keep all the vital minerals, like lithium ion and all this shit that you’ve got that we kind of need, and we’ll just like, stagnate our civilisation and just not come take it.”

 

And it’s like, that’s obviously pretty unrealistic. That’s just not how any civilisation has operated ever in world history. And the argument, I want to get your take on this because the argument from Keith Woods, I haven’t spoken to him about this directly this week, but I’ve spoken to him about this a lot over the years because we’re old friends. And his argument is that, well, the thing is he’d be like:

 

“Okay, I can see what you’re saying. But the thing is that if we put ourselves about in that kind of realistic supremacist way, we’re going to freak out all the other White people. And then White people aren’t going to want to do White nationalism because they’re going to get freaked out by this, like unoptical supremacism that makes it seem like Whites organising politically really is what the jewish media caricatures it as. It really is this genocidal, immoral, you know, evil, maniacal force in the world. And maybe the jews are right. Maybe the White race does need to be, … Maybe Daniel is right. Maybe the Muslims have to come and replace us to make sure that we don’t create some kind of dystopian, like, techno futurism that enslaves the world or something.”

 

But my retort to that is that I don’t think that Whites who are too morally cucked to embrace supremacy will have what it takes to take our countries back. I think the only Whites that will be capable of having the grit to rise up, take back control, do what needs to be done to assert ourselves back over our countries, which is going to require a hard struggle. And we’re going to have to basically ruin the lives of all the non-Whites that live in our countries to send them back. And some of them might want to fight us, as. Well, that’s going to require a kind of stomach for doing that. Kind of the assertion that:

 

“No, we are going to put our people first, and we don’t really care if that ruins your life. We don’t really care if people have to get hurt. We’re gonna do it!”

 

And I think really only, like, for someone to have that attitude, they have to kind of leave the humanitarian, you know, chungus, equitable. Like, let’s sit down in a room in suits and work this out like civilised individuals. Like, I don’t think that’s realistic. I don’t think we’re going to sit down and negotiate our way out of this. I’m going to have to fight our way out of this, and we’re going to have to impose ourselves in a very forceful way.

 

And the people that impose themselves are ultimately going to be supremacists. And Whites aren’t, like, innately incapable of having a supremacist worldview because we literally used to! We literally did White supremacy already and ran the whole fucking world! We had colonial empires that spanned the entire globe. We almost conquered the whole fucking thing! Like, 100 years ago. We literally ran everything in the entire world except Japan and China, and that was about it. We ran everything else.

 

So, yeah, like, it’s not like Whites are inherently cucked and unable to embrace this worldview. But I think we have to overcome the source, that spiritual source of that cuckoldry to win! And all else is folly!

 

But how do you see it?

 

[42:22]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Keith is playing that optical game, and maybe he does genuinely believe that. And that is certainly a much stronger position than the people that are currently in power or that currently are ruling over White people.

 

So that’s fine and noble. But, just because you remove your claws doesn’t make you a good person. Ultimately, White people need to have their claws back. And I kind of had a strange discourse today, just responding to another Telegram page, a big Telegram page that was talking about how cruelty was a bad thing or an evil thing, that was just completely off the mark, which we don’t need to go into. But you did mention cruelty in your little segment, and you mentioned re-migration, and you mentioned taking resources.

 

And so in this thought experiment, we’ve got this idea of we’re going to need resources. Let’s say we end our finite supply and Africa is there for the taking, and it’s more or less gone back to the Stone Age. What process do we initiate in order to get the resources? Well, the way I understand White people to be is that we’re very polite. White people innately are very polite. And we would probably try to get what we want through peace before just going straight to war. I don’t think White people are innately barbaric, that are just like, yep, let’s just smash everyone and everything in our way. We generally look for a path of least resistance. The jews often do the same thing, but then when they don’t get what they want, they usually look towards subversion.

 

And so when you have kind of Anglo and jewish influences within a federal government like the United States or Great Britain, you have all these kind of different foreign policies in order to obtain the resources that you want.

 

So the English, obviously, with some heavy influence from the East India Company and some jews in the banking sector established gun boat diplomacy, for example, and gunboat diplomacy expanded massively through the American empire post World War Two. And it goes under many different names.

 

There’s many books written about it. But more or less, it’s like how to conquer nations through debt slavery, through embargoes, through pressuring them and these stages of escalation until they fucking, you know, funding coups to take out, you know, Saddam or take out Gaddafi or whoever it is or Bashar Al-Assad. So we can see that that is an innate kind of hybrid policy versus the kind of Faustian or Aryan spirit with German National Socialism where Hitler’s like:

 

“All right, Germany needs living space. We’re going to push the Slavs, like, further into Eastern Europe or further past the Volga into the Caucasus, and Germany is going to expand down these river systems where all these German colonies exist already in Eastern Europe. And we’re just going to bridge these gaps so that we’ve got more land and we’re just going to fucking do it!”

 

So obviously, there’s this kind of just outward force, and then there’s kind of more calculated, maybe a little bit more Machiavellian, maybe a bit more subversive forces in order to get what we want.

 

But ultimately, when we, as you said, when we unshackle ourselves from this spiritual virus, which centres around White guilt and this guilty consciousness for what’s happened in the past, when that’s gone, when that’s no longer, you know, containing our will, we’re going to see White colonialism on a whole new level.

 

Now regarding re-migration, because that’s actually more important than taking resources in Africa because, yeah, like, whenever I get asked questions like that:

 

“Are we going to do this? Are we going to do that?”

 

Yeah, sure. Like let’s clean up the house first. And when the house is clean, we can focus on the street.

 

[46:32]

 

So it’s like, let’s deal with the immediate issue, which is obviously jewish control of our nation, and the traitors, the traitors that are in control of our nation. When we deal with that, I think the vast majority of non-Whites are going to leave Australia. Once White people rise up and we take back our government and we kick out and deal with all the traitors and all the jews, and either go to Israel or whatever. That’s a good point in itself because people always FED post with that. But I had my, like the 10th or 11th bank account shut down recently.

 

And I remember the first time I had my bank account shut down. My politics was very, very, I wasn’t very fanatical. I don’t know how to express it. I had the same essence of what I have now, but it was nowhere near as strong, it was nowhere near as radical. It wasn’t fanatical. I wasn’t obsessed the way I am now. I wasn’t a seeking justice, I wasn’t personally hurt, I wasn’t personally aggrieved. I wasn’t motivated by a sense of deep, deep pressure! There wasn’t a deep pressure to change the problem. It was more just like a holistic:

 

“There’s a wrong, it needs to be corrected. This is a better way of running the country.”

 

It was more rational, less emotional.

 

And then they shut down my first bank account. This goes back to 2015. And I thought to myself:

 

“Whoa, that’s an escalation. I don’t like the symbology of that. Where is this going? Is this how this government behaves? This is how this corporate state behaves? They’re willing to go to that length? They’re willing to eventually take food off my table, so I starve to death, or I can’t provide an income for myself or my future family. Okay, that’s an escalation!”

 

And my politics started radically changing after that point! Because I was personally aggrieved.

 

So what that where I’m going with that, at a tactical, strategic level. Sorry, not tactical, strategic level, is everyone’s going to get exactly what they deserve. So if this is resolved nicely and quickly in the next, say, like, decade, I’m sure there will be these, like very astute, you know, Keith Woods approved policies of how we’re going to do re-migration and how it’s going to be packaged and the optics of it. And it starts with these:

 

“Can you please leave? And here’s the plane ticket.”

 

And then it kind of escalates. It continues escalating.

 

And so what’s happening is the longer this goes on for, the more damage done to White people in the process, the worse, the more cruel, the more horrible, the more violent, aggressive, dominating, exhaustive is the energy and the violence that White people are going to be capable of! It’s not even that I want that or don’t want that, it’s beyond that! It’s like that’s what we’re going to be capable of as a collective the longer this goes on for.

 

So you have re-migration, but we’re not even calling for re-migration. We don’t even use that term. We do a little bit, but the term that we put on our banner was “deportation”. And that’s a whole different kind of conversation. When you talk about re-migration, it’s kind of packaged nicely and softly. We talk about deportation. It’s at bayonet point! It’s a completely different kind of, it’s a more aggressive approach because I think fundamentally our belief is that re-migration is not enough.

 

What re-migration entails is a polite conversation, and asking people to leave and maybe getting rid of some troublemakers, versus deportations implies actually changing the structure of the society completely! Totally! Absolutely! And the team, like Keith Wood’s team, I’m sure he’ll progress, and I’m sure as time goes on, they will sense the further aggrievement of society as a whole, and they will sense the further escalation. Because this ultimately goes back to Israel-Palestine or Israel Lebanon or Israel Iran. It’s the same sort of concept. It’s a type of warfare that is escalating, that’s constantly escalating. So where it is at the moment, re-migration, Keith Woods, friendly optics. Where it is right now at this exact point in time, is probably the most popular thing as we’re seeing with European elections at the moment. Is that going to be the case in ten years time? I don’t think so. and that’s why our optics are built different.

 

So that’s what I think about it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, I know Keith pretty well, and I don’t doubt that he is well intentioned. I never question his intentions. I think he’s trying to do what he thinks is the best thing for, not just for the Irish, but for the White race in general. I think he is sincere.

 

But, yeah, for me, because I used to have a little bit more of that strategy in my approach. That was partly due to also trying to make my nationalism and my Catholicism fit together. It was partly because of that as well, or I think largely because of that.

 

But when I look at things objectively in some of these European countries, I can see maybe a cleaner way of preserving their demographics. But when I look at the core countries, which are really where the power is distributed, like the United States, Britain, France, Germany, or here, I don’t think it’s going to be so simple. And those are really the key countries, the key geographical locales that need to be secured.

 

Whereas I think in Hungary and in Austria, they can probably vote their way to maintaining a 95% White country, plus. Hungary basically has that already. The Austrians, very positive signs. I mean, I want to talk a bit about the Austrian election, but I guess this will bridge into it a little bit. But I want to discuss that as a separate topic.

 

[53:05]

 

But, yeah, but for me, I’m kind of looking, like, three steps ahead, and I’m like, okay, I’m already there. And I’m trying to prepare people for the fact that that’s where we’re going. That’s kind of like the inevitable destination. And the sooner that people accept that and prepare accordingly. And by preparing, I don’t mean, I’m not FED posting, I’m not saying:

 

“Stockpile your guns. Race wars are coming!”

 

I’m not saying that. Don’t misconstrue me.

 

What I’m saying is preparing yourself, like, mentally and spiritually for the attitude and the mentality that is going to be necessary at that point.

 

So anyway, yeah, my view on this is that uh, things are going to accelerate into a more, … And what I mean by that as well, White people are at the moment, yes, the majority of White people are afraid of going full where we are, with our position, obviously. But the resistance is weakening. You know, in the last two years, I posted about this today. The discourse even within our movement has become so much more radical and also, generally speaking. Just think about it. Like, across European politics, conservatism is dead. There is not even one country where the conservative Party is getting more votes than the populist, Right-wing, anti-immigration party. Except England. Like, except Britain, just. Where, the conservatives are only slightly ahead of the Reform Party. And by the next election, I think Reform could overtake them because the Tories are either going to put some jew in charge who’s going to shill for Israel egregiously, and he might do somewhat better, or the other main candidate seems to be this black woman.

 

So the conservatives, I really hope they put the black woman in charge of the conservatives, [chuckling] because that would be hilarious! They’ll completely die. So conservatism as a political aesthetic is dead in Europe. In the United States we criticise Trump, and the criticisms are valid.

 

But if you look at it objectively, Trump’s campaign this time around is more radical than the last two times. Like, he wasn’t promising mass deportations the first two times. That’s now his signature policy. And that’s actually an intensification. But our movement has progressed so quickly and so radically that we’re further away from Trump. Like, Trump moved, like, 10% or 20% towards us, but then we moved, like, 80% away. So then we’re just like:

 

“What the fuck is this?”

 

Whereas in 2016, there was all of this kind of energy from the Alt-Right, the dissident Right, whatever, for Trump, and people are acting like, as if Trump cucked and he used to be based, but now, it’s literally the same shit! It’s actually a slightly more radical version of what it already was. And that’s something interesting to behold.

 

There’s been this radicalisation, and then even in Australia the response to our organisation you know, people wouldn’t touch. Even, like, twelve months ago, people wouldn’t touch us with a twelve foot pole now. You know, attitudes are softening massively, massively!

 

Thomas Sewell: Mmm.

 

Joel Davis: And what I kind of prophesy is that as the situation gets worse, as White people are not just demographically crowded out by all this immigration, like, I just saw, I have to confirm this and look into it, but I saw some posts on Twitter about the New Zealand census, which New Zealand is only 55% White now! Which, like, their census from last year, which is insane! Because I thought it was 80% White. I haven’t been to New Zealand in five years, so it’s a small population, and a lot of the Whites in New Zealand move here.

 

So I don’t know. I have to look into that. I’ll talk about it more on the show next week when I’ve had a chance to check those figures for myself. But I mean, that’s insane! If that’s true, that’s fucking insane! That is such a quick transition. America is almost majority, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Canada’s had the fastest transition. I saw some statistics today that said, I think it said five out of the top six cities. I’d have to find it again. But I think from memory what it said, five of the six cities with the highest percentage of foreign born people were in Canada.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that doesn’t surprise me. And the rates of immigration here have been obviously crazy in recent years. Australia is lucky in the sense that we do get a decent amount of White immigration. We get people coming here from Britain and Ireland and stuff, and that helps preserve our demographic to a certain extent.

 

And I actually posted about this again recently that if you look at the voting patterns, like, I really find it annoying when you get these Australian parochialists wherexx they are like:

 

“Oh, like, fuck the Poms!”

 

Like, they have an issue with White immigrants. It’s like White immigrants are a blessing. If you look at the data, European immigrants are way more Right-wing than native born Australians. They’re majority Right-wing voters. They’re more opposed to immigration as well, I’ve seen in certain polls than native born Australians. There’s plenty of people in our organisation, by the way, that weren’t born here and we’re in the situation as a race.

 

So I think that is kind of like really short sighted and narrow minded to take that view. The problem isn’t immigration necessarily. The problem is non-White immigration. Like, White immigration is fine. This country was built off White immigration.

 

[58:42]

 

But, the point though is that the demographics are getting ridiculously destroyed in a super quick way now. Like, the rates are boosting and at the same time the anti-White persecution is boosting. It gets to the point now Muslims are organising to have their own independent power bloc and so on. The racial lines are getting a lot more explicit.

 

There’s a point at which you have such a high degree of racial conflict at the core of your political system that these kind of highfalutin ethical ideals like “justice and rights” and all of this kind of stuff that is like the bedrock of liberal democracy, where these things start to really subside in kind of relevance. And all that people start to care about is just the existential reality of:

 

“My team winning, my team losing, my team being subjugated, my team fighting back against oppression!”

 

Or whatever. And people just start seeing politics in these kind of tribalistic friend-enemy, distinction, us versus them turns, and they start to see the world in a dog-eat-dog way.

 

Like, if you look at the data on Trump supporters, the Trump supporters that live in cities, I saw a poll about this years ago, they have more of, like a dog-eat-dog understanding of the world, and they’re more concerned about immigration. Where the Trump supporters that live in the really White areas, they’re like generic Christian, Evangelical Christian Republicans who are just voting for the Republican Party because that’s what they do. But they aren’t anywhere near as concerned with immigration. And they’re a lot more soft on racial issues, because they live in a White neighbourhood in a nice part of America. So they don’t actually have to deal with the same issues that the city dwelling Whites have to deal with. Where there’s black ghettos around them and beaners are pouring in and they’re getting crowded out in the place where they grew up. There’s lots of places in major cities where they’re just not the same place that they were 10, 20 years ago when you were younger. They’ve been completely transformed.

 

So that is going to incept over time, more of this kind of existential framing on politics, and it’s going to soften people up to hearing what we have to say, which is a very simple message, which is that:

 

“Forget all the noise. Either we come together and fight back and defend the ourselves and our interests against all of these people that are targeting us and that are against us and want to destroy us, or they’ll destroy us!”

 

And all of your ideals about fucking freedom and justice and humanitarianism, like, you can shove that up your ass! Because that is really, like, almost irrelevant at this point. Because none of those principles are being given to us by anyone else. None of these other groups that are, they’re all hypocrites! None of them extend any of these rights or concerns to us. So why the fuck should we care about them? We should reassert ourselves, take back control. And when we have power and control and stability, then we can worry about them again.

 

And that message might seem radical right now, but it’s becoming less and less radical by the day. And people are more and more for it because, and I think in a lot of ways as well, that’s actually the only way to make politics interesting to a lot of Australians. I think a lot of Australians, they’re apolitical because it’s not necessarily because they have no interest potentially, in politics whatsoever! And they’re just totally just apolitical zombies. It’s because politics hasn’t been interesting. If politics is a battle between conservatism and socialism, they don’t really give a fuck!

 

But if politics becomes race war, that’s infinitely more interesting. And if politics goes from being like this kind of gay argument about ideology and it becomes something concrete, which is:

 

“Are we going to have control of this country? Or are we going to just give it away and become subjugated in our own country and just be, like, cucked by this whole process?”

 

That actually is a fight! Like, it’s not about:

 

“Who are you voting for and how much taxes should we pay. It’s like, this is a fucking knife fight for who controls the country!”

 

So I actually have a lot of faith in our politics to become very popular and very engaging to a large group of people in the coming decade. That’s the main difference that I have with, I don’t want to use the word “optics cuck”, because that’s not necessarily accurate. I think, in a lot of cases. But with the very ethically constrained humanitarian version of White nationalism, where I think that that approach, the idea that Whites will only embrace a pro-White position within that purview, and they won’t embrace a kind of more like, realistic dog-eat-dog world existential White nationalism, which is just like:

 

“It’s us or them! Which side are you fucking on?”

 

I just don’t buy that. I don’t think that’s actually true.

 

But I guess I don’t know where Tom went. I guess he’ll be back soon. I wanted to get his take, but I was just kind of finished that point.

 

But while he’s gone, I guess we can talk about the Austrian election. The Austrian election was quite interesting. The Freedom Party of Austria, which is, I think it’s one of the most radical parties in Europe that actually gets votes and is like, a mainstream power player. So their policies are like:

 

“We’re not going to take any asylum seeker, even applications, we’re not even going to take refugee applications. Full stop. Fortress Austria!”

 

They call it “Fortress Austria! Fortress Europe! No immigration!” Like, literally no immigration from outside Europe into Europe is their position. And re-migration plans to start repatriating non-Whites back to wherever they came from.

 

So it’s a very radical set of policies by the standards of European politics.

 

[1:04:42]

 

 

As I said, there’s not really many other parties in Europe that have any kind of support behind them, that have policies that radical. And they just got the most votes of any party. They got like 30% of the vote in the Austrian election and they could make a deal with the conservatives to create a coalition and rule. So right now, the Chancellor of Austria is the leader of the conservatives, who got, like, I think, 25% of the votes.

 

So they’ve got enough seats between them to run the government. And they’re now, I think, going to negotiate, you know, potentially some kind of coalition government. Those negotiations could fail. I watched a few Martin Sellner* interviews, who is the most, like, well known identitarian nationalist activist in Austria. Did a few streams with him back in the day, actually, very intelligent guy, an incredible activist, very successful.

 

[* Martin Michael Sellner (born 8 January 1989) is an Austrian far-Right political activist, and leader of the Identitarian Movement of Austria, which he cofounded in 2012. He is considered to be a key figure in the Neue Rechte in the German-speaking countries. He is also deemed to be part of the alt-right movement. In March 2018, he was denied entry to, and deported from, the United Kingdom. A year later, he was denied entry to the United States because of the Christchurch shooter event. In March 2024, the city of Potsdam tried to ban Sellner from entering Germany for 3 years, because of his speech on “remigration” at the 2023 Potsdam far-Right meeting, that ban was revoked by a German court in late May 2024. Sellner talks about the Great Replacement. In March 2024, Sellner was arrested by Swiss police while he was giving a speech at an event of the Swiss Identitarian organisation. Wikipedia]

 

And I think he’s the individual that is most responsible for the normalisation of the term “re-migration” in the world. So you have to give him a lot of credit for that.

 

And he was saying that obviously, he has a lot of connections and a lot of understanding of Austrian politics. He was saying that he is doubtful that the conservatives will ultimately be willing to form a coalition with the Freedom Party, that they will allow Kickl, who’s the leader of the Freedom Party, to become the Chancellor, and that those negotiations might be unsuccessful and the conservatives might go to the socialists and some of the other Left-wing parties and try and create a coalition there instead. And they’ll have to rule with a slim majority.

 

And maybe this is actually good, because if the conservatives can’t make a deal with the nationalists and instead go and make a deal with the socialists to rule, even though the nationalists are the most popular party in the country, that will look very bad for them. The government that they negotiate out will be obviously even more cucked than the conservative government has been because they’ll have to make all these concessions to the Left. Meanwhile, the Freedom Party will be able to kind of fight both of them as, like one thing as a pure opposition movement.

 

And if you look at the voter demographics, the majority of the conservative votes are coming from Boomers, whereas, like, younger voters, like even like Gen-X, Millennials and Zoomers are way more voting for the Freedom Party than any other party in Austria. So demographics are on, age demography is on their side. They are the ascendant party, like the ones that have been making gains for the last few years.

 

So if they don’t get a coalition sorted I could see them doing even better at the next election and then being at that point too big that they’ll be able to kind of form the government. They’ll be too big to fail at that point, and the conservatives will be so decimated that they can subjugate them basically to their coalition at the next election.

 

So it’ll be interesting to see what happens, like, whether they actually get into government now or not. But what it shows is that a hardcore anti-immigration platform and a pro-re-migration platform can win politically in central Europe.

 

And obviously parties like that, like the AfD in Germany and other parties with similar policies, are doing incredibly well all over Europe.

 

And so it is kind of white pilling to see that European voters, particularly young European voters, basically awakening to their interests and backing the further Right parties. And, yeah, there’s, like so much momentum behind the idea of not just shutting down immigration into Europe from non-Whites, but actually fucking sending them back and kind of just securing Europe for the White race.

 

So I think that’s quite positive. I’m quite white pilled about it. Not that I think that these guys are going to get in and fix everything in the next year or something, but that the trajectory is very good. It’s very good.

 

How do you see it?

 

Thomas Sewell: The quote that comes to mind is Adolf Hitler. He says:

 

“The strong man is strongest alone.”

 

And that applies perfectly to this exact scenario. There’s a lot of Hitler quotes that are taken out of context or used for things that aren’t necessarily relevant. But that quote is relative to the NSDAP struggle, their historical struggle, and they obviously entered in a lot of coalitions. They had a lot of election success in 31 and 32, but not enough success to completely take power. And even right at the end, they had to, well, just before the second last thing, I guess, that they did was they entered into a coalition with the monarchists. That was the last faction left. But there was many, many circumstances where they were doing very well. And in order to have some sort of share of power, they had to make these concessions. And Hitler refused to make the concessions. He said:

 

“The strong man is strongest alone.”

 

And so it’s very good to see this kind of progress. And the politics is just so rapidly changing across Europe. I mean, Martin Sellner and all these freedom parties across Europe, from the Netherlands to Austria to AfD to the Swedish version, all these parties were just microscopic ten years ago, they were just micro parties, kind of like here in Australia, how we’ve just got all these useless micro parties. And they just had a vision of where they wanted to be. Where they wanted to go. They didn’t really keep too many secrets as to where they were going. They played the very optical game, which if you want to have a sort of five or ten year period success, you do that you don’t do what we’re doing, that’s for sure. And they’ve achieved a lot of these parties are either the second or third or now, in the case of the Freedom Party in Austria, they’re the biggest party in the country.

 

[1:10:48]

 

This rolls downhill and this should be very white pilling for everyone, even if this isn’t the be all and end all for Europe or central Europe, obviously, it’s going to be a much more serious party, or a more serious version of the Freedom Party that’s going to be equipped with The Right Stuff to really make the big differences. And that brings me to the point that I discussed before when we brought up Keith Woods. The subject of re-migration is really important because the second half of the statement re-migration is not when, it’s not why, it’s how! And it’s with, what army?

 

So that’s the second half of the question with what army? And why we are doing what we’re doing and why we’re doing it differently to, say AfD or Freedom party or the party in the Netherlands or SD or whatever it’s called in Sweden.

 

The reason why we’re doing what we’re doing is because you can’t use the current state apparatus to achieve the goals that you actually need to in its current form. Where Australia needs to go, where America needs to go, where Britain needs to go, where all of Europe needs to go, where all of us together need to go. We need a state apparatus that can enforce the political party.

 

So we don’t actually have that. What we have is a liberal democratic system where, let’s say, hypothetically, we take power in ten years or 15 or five. The number doesn’t really matter, the timeframe doesn’t matter for the scenario.

 

But then you start these re-migrations, so you turbocharge., … We have Customs here in Australia. We have, like, Customs. We have border security. We have a similar version to what they have in America called ICE*. We have these things here in Australia, and these things are everywhere in America and in Europe. Now, are they very large? Are they large enough? No! Could we turbocharge these things? Could we put more funding into them because now we’ve got power, now we control Parliament, we can put a couple hundred million dollars into these parts of the state apparatus. But this is not something that can be fixed with money, because just like how the government is telling American soldiers that they can’t go help their families, they’ve got to be on standby to go to the Middle East and its bordering on a mutiny.

 

[* U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is a federal law enforcement agency under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. ICE’s stated mission is to protect the United States from cross-border crime and undocumented immigration that threaten national security and public safety. Wikipedia]

 

Likewise, if the State Department is full of people that are fundamentally traitors or they’re not actually supporters of the Freedom Party, or they’re not supporters of the re-migration effort, you’re only ever going to get these kind of piss poor attempts at really attacking the nerve centre of migration. You’re going to have criminals sent back. You’re going to have all the loose hanging fruit is going to be sent back. Anyone that’s kind of just easy to grab is going to be sent back. But there’s still going to be millions of non-Whites in Austria, there’s still going to be millions of non-Whites in England or Australia and tens of millions of non-Whites in the United States, even with a million or two being deported.

 

So then you’re back at square one. Okay, well, so what do we need to do then? So then either you force the state apparatus through further legislation, you force them to go even further and you’re going to face a mutiny. You’re going to face an ineffective government. And the people in the Freedom Party, the people in the Republican Party, whoever’s going to be in charge of deportations in this first round of deportations, they’re not stupid. Sorry, not in charge of but the people that are going to be soliciting it, they’re not stupid. They know when they’re going to be on the brink of mutiny. They know when the state apparatus is going to say no. They know when the general public are going to strike and protest. And they’re going to have, they’re going to want to do it in a way that escalates the situation but doesn’t escalate enough that you’re going to see mass hysteria in the public. You’re going to see the media kick off, you’re going to see some Lefties complaint and some protests in the city. But you’re not going to see like what happened with the Freedom Convoy and the Freedom Rallies [re Covid] where a quarter of a million people are in the street and the CBD is just at a standstill for days. You’re not going to see that with a small amount of deportations.

 

But with mass deportations, you are going to see that. The state apparatus isn’t able to actually do what it needs to do to clean the country up, to fix the problem. So then we’re back at square one.

 

So it’s not money that you throw at the department or the apparatus. It’s now a change in manpower. It’s a complete change in manpower. Now, the entryists or the reformers, the Fuentes types, they want to trickle people in to the state apparatus. They want to say:

 

“Hey, you know, do you want to join the military? You should join the military! Hey, you want to join border control, you should join border control. You want to be a lawyer, you should become a lawyer. You want to do these things? Do it, and then be our guy on the inside. And then when we take political power, we’ll be able to promote you internally up in the ranks, and you’ll know your guys, and they’ll be on our team.”

 

That’s an interesting theory, and it might work for some small scale stuff, but the kind of scale that we’re talking about that’s necessary to secure the existence of our people in the future for White children needs a complete reshuffle of the state apparatus.

 

[1:16:45]

 

And so what we’re doing is not just building a political movement, or a political party. Sorry, we are building a political movement, but we’re not just building a political party. We’re actually building a state apparatus. We’re building a replacement state apparatus. So that when we take political power and the state apparatus doesn’t do what it’s told, we can just replace them. So re-migration with what army? That’s why people need to consider their physical involvement, not just their political support, not just a donation, or a vote at a ballot box. You need to actually consider yourselves part of a machine, part of a mechanism that can actually not just take state power, but actually enforce state power.

 

So the last point I’ll make on the subject is the historical example of Adolf Hitler. Hitler went through this interesting process where he didn’t need to take totalitarian control as much as people say that he did. He didn’t actually need to.

 

For example, one of the biggest issues he had with the SA* was demobilising them. The SA didn’t want to demobilise. He had two and a half million men. They didn’t want to demobilise. He integrated some of them into the Wehrmacht. And obviously the SS eventually became the Waffen SS, so it became an armed part of the political wing, and it became way bigger as Waffen SS than it ever was as just the SS. But Hitler didn’t need to actually take control of all the state apparatuses. He could just replace some key people and just the machine just started operating as it needed to, because, again, Hitler was in part a reformer. He had a revolutionary ideology, but when he actually took power, the country only had a small percentage of traitors in it, and it was still 99% German.

 

[* The Sturmabteilung (German SA; lit. ’Storm Division’ or ‘Storm Troopers’) was the original paramilitary wing of the NS Party. It played a significant role in Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in the 1920s and early 1930s. Its primary purposes were providing protection for Nazi rallies and assemblies, disrupting the meetings of opposing parties, fighting against the paramilitary units of the opposing parties, especially the Roter Frontkämpferbund of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) and the Reichsbanner Schwarz-Rot-Gold of the Social Democratic Party of Germany. The SA were colloquially called Brownshirts (Braunhemden) because of the colour of their uniform’s shirts, similar to Benito Mussolini’s blackshirts. The official uniform of the SA was a brown shirt with a brown tie. The colour came about because a large shipment of Lettow-shirts, originally intended for the German colonial troops in Germany’s former East Africa colony, was purchased in 1921 by Gerhard Roßbach for use by his Freikorps paramilitary unit. Wikipedia]

 

So we’re dealing with a different situation, where Hitler had the insurance policy. If the Wehrmacht went on strike, or if the Wehrmacht said:

 

“No, actually, we don’t support this regime change, or we don’t support the Reichstag degree, or we don’t., …”

 

You know, if they try to do a coup, they weren’t able to, because he had the SA and he wouldn’t have demobilised the SA, he would have militarized the SA and he would have removed the Wehrmacht from the opinion. So, I’ll say it again and then I’ll finish:

 

“Re-migration with what army?”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think the Austrians are very well organised, like, across the board in their nationalist movement, from what I’ve seen. And there is a lot of behind the scenes organisation there as well. And their activism, street activism, is first class. They’re very impressive. I think we should really study the Austrians and look to them as a model for how to develop the nationalist movement in other European and White countries in general, because they’re one of the leading countries for this.

 

So I think we have to give them a lot of credit. And I do really respect a lot of the guys that have really put in over there over the years. And in many ways, I think the Freedom Party was in, of Austria, was the first, like, modern, like, contemporary style, like, populist, Right-wing, anti-immigration party that really existed in Western politics.

 

So there have been innovators, and it’s, I guess, unsurprising that the Austrians are the innovators of the new paradigm. Austrians have a penchant for this kind of thing. And they’re in a unique position because Austria is not in NATO, so they have a little bit more independence.

 

But they’re in the EU.

 

And that’s the thing when also, that’s another aspect of this whole thing about controlling their borders is that, … And they’re aware of this as well, obviously, they really want to create coalitions within the EU to push for EU wide policies, because the EU is, the borders are open within Europe. So if Austria and Hungary and some of these countries are like:

 

“Fuck immigrants!”

 

But the Germans and the French and everything are like bringing immigrants in and they’re dominating the EU, then there’s only so much they can do, because they’re part of the EU. Like, yeah, they can deny asylum applications, they can send some people back, but they can’t have full control over their borders. There has to be a European wide solution.

 

But the fact is that these kinds of parties are rising everywhere and they’re different levels of quality. Like, I think the Austrian populists are far more radical and far better ideologically than the French or the Italian. Like, you know, Meloni’s clique or whatever. There’s Lega, like the League of the North in Salvini’s party in Italy, that’s a little bit better. But I don’t know, Italian politics is a little bit complex. They aren’t as popular, and they still aren’t as radical as the Freedom Party, I think. So but the Germanosphere that seems to be leading the way, like anti-immigration politics are being very successful also in Scandinavia. Like, it’s growing in Sweden, it’s growing in Denmark, obviously in Germany, the AfD is doing fantastically well. So that kind of like central European corridor.

 

I mean, even in the Netherlands, their populist Right party is kind of fucked up! The People’s Party or whatever it is that Geert Wilders runs. Wilders is like mixed race and I think part jewish. And he redirected all that energy into like shilling for Israel and hasn’t really done very much since he got elected to resolve things there.

 

But I think the Freedom Party will do a lot better, if they get in.

 

[1:22:19]

 

Thomas Sewell: They built off a primarily anti-Islam movement. So they were kind of like a Civnatty pro-zionist. It’s kind of like Tommy Robinson, the political party with like a quarter Indonesian Dutch dude.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So I think people have this tendency, I saw people saying like:

 

“Oh, who cares about the Freedom Party? Look at what happened with Meloni in Italy.”

 

And it’s like, no! Like, if you understand the history of this party, it was actually like the Freedom Party, by the way, was created by like an SS officer. But it’s not really about that history, that goes back to the fifties. But from the nineties onwards, it’s been kinda kind of a leading party in Europe for the anti-immigration cause. And the Austrian kind of nationalist movement, identitarian movement, is very advanced and has really like, pushed the Overton Window in Austrian politics. And they look to Hungary as a model. And you could say about Viktor Orban in Hungary that he is surrounded by jews. I think he has a jewish wife, and that’s true.

 

But also, like, as far as European leaders go, he’s like the best on immigration and preserving the demographics of his country. That’s just an obvious truth. Obviously Austria, Hungary have historical links, but they’re kind of looking to that as a model.

 

And what’s interesting about that is that what you were talking about before that in Hungary, you have an example of the Right-wing seizing control of the state, not just winning an election, but like actually capturing control of state institutions and, basically kicking out, like reforming the education system and reforming the media and kicking out a lot of elements out of Hungarian society. And Orban calls it a “illiberal democracy” as he doesn’t subscribe to this liberal idea that we’re just going to allow all these NGO’s and like communist and like American backed, jewish backed necessarily. There’s probably some, like Zionist things, institutions that operate in Hungary. But the Left-wing institutions have been really defeated at the institutional level.

 

And now if I was Hungarian, I would vote for Mi Hazánk. I’m sorry if I pronounced that wrong, who seemed to be like a more pure, like, nationalist party that doesn’t have all these jewish links, from what I can see. But just looking at it objectively like, the Hungarian political system is in a much better place than almost any other Western country. And it’s because of embracing a kind of illiberal kind of philosophy. And Martin Sellner has written books about institutional capture and this kind of thing that are very popular in the Freedom Party circles and in the AfD circles in Germany as well, even in Swiss politics. And the leader of the Freedom Party refused many times to disavow Martin Sellner. And they brought up that Sellner did some activism when he was a kid, defacing a synagogue and accusing him of being a neo-Nazi. And Kickl refused to cuck.

 

And so that indicates that the identitarians over there hold a lot of sway, and they aren’t as radical as us, but they’re pretty solid on a lot of the key issues.

 

But it’s something that we need to keep an eye on and watch with keen interests and particularly if they can seize power to see how it goes. And how successful they are, what challenges they run into, because, yeah, there’s nothing like that in Australia. [chuckling] Like, at this stage, we want to build it. We want to build something.

 

But when you look around at the Australian populist Right, I mean, there’s nothing doing. I mean, One Nation is a joke. It’s almost, it’s a toss up whether it’s a joke because Pauline Hanson is an egomaniac, or it’s a joke because that homosexual that basically runs the party, who’s her, you know, top staffer James Ashby is like a Liberal Party operative, like, purposefully sabotaging the party. I don’t know if that’s true or not, but it’s a totally dysfunctional party. Like, what we’re seeing in Europe would be replicated here if One Nation opened itself up to membership. Like, I’ve talked about this before, like, if you become a member of One Nation, you don’t get any voting rights, there’s no branches.

 

So the activist, you know, cadre of the nationalist movement in Australia, there’s no party for them to go into. They can’t go into One Nation and fill it up with fresh, young blood and have all the talent accumulate there and have a kind of dynamic campaign. If they did have something like that, heaps of our guys would be in there. The party would probably be 50% more radical than it is, and they’d probably be getting 15% to 20% of the vote and really challenging the Liberals from the Right. But it’s totally incompetently run.

 

And all the other options, like, what else have you got? Like, you’ve got the United Australia party, Clive Palmer’s outfit, and he basically folds the party and then reconstitutes it just before the election, every election cycle. There’s no continuity, there’s no branches. Again, it’s just all, Clive Palmer just throws money around because he’s a billionaire, in a very arbitrary way. There’s no ideological structure to it and its policies are kind of vapid. And, yeah, there isn’t a lot of other options.

 

Like, it’s interesting, the Libertarian Party seems interesting because I’ve heard noises internally that they’re going to embrace a officially an immigration policy that is totally restrictionist, that is to the right of Pauline Hanson, and One Nation. If they do that would be very interesting because I think there’s a recognition with a lot of the libertarians that libertarianism itself isn’t that popular. You kind of have to mix it with nationalism to get anyone to actually vote for it or care about it.

 

So that’s interesting to see how that develops. But there isn’t really much cooking on the Australian Right.

 

[1:28:24]

 

Meanwhile, our population, like, we have a naturally I think, racially minded and Right-wing population in sentiment, but it’s just totally depoliticised and there’s nothing really engaging within the political system. Like, I was watching a little bit of the vice presidential debate in America the other day and there was all these Americans posting about it on Twitter. And I was thinking to myself:

 

“I’ve never watched a political debate between two Australian politicians before in my life!”

 

I’ve never even had a conversation with someone about, oh, in the debate between, like, I’m sure they have debates. Like, they must have had a debate between Albanese and Morrison for the last election. I didn’t fucking even know it was on TV or care. I don’t think anyone really did. Most of the time, I don’t even remember that the election is on and my mum called, calls me and is like:

 

“Make sure you vote!”

 

Like, I don’t even remember. And I’m like a political guy.

 

And that’s how boring Australian politics is and how disengaging it is so whereas, like, Americans are like:

 

“Oh, my God!”

 

Like, it’s not even the presidential debate. It’s like JD Vance versus, I can’t remember the other guy’s name. vv Tim Walz or something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s totally uninteresting. But like this, it’s like this big thing and there’s like tens of millions tuning in and like, it’s a big deal. It’s like:

 

“Got to watch the game, got to watch the debate!”

 

Kind of thing.

 

So, yeah, we don’t have a society like that. And I think that’s part of, part of the problem, maybe part of the solution ultimately could be if it’s like judo flipped against the establishment. What’s the term you always use, Tom? You say they’re all, … You need to use the term “skin suits”. You use the terminal “skeleton crews”, all the major parties.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. It is a skeleton crew. Our capture of Australian politics and the state apparatus is going to be extremely slow and painful and nothing is going to happen. And then it’s going to be really quick. It’s going to be really quick and everything’s going to happen. Because they’re just so stretched thin. And there’s no genuine interest. Like the political parties themselves. The Greens are actually going to be the hardest party to defeat because they have the most, … And obviously, when the Muslims finally mobilise, they will be quite difficult. But the Liberal Party and Labor Party, … It’s interesting that our goals align actually quite nicely with just the way things are going to be moving. The Liberal Party is actually the easiest party to destroy out of the big three. Even though it’s usually the most powerful, it’s actually the easiest to destroy. It’s just held in place by some private school boys and jewish money. That’s really all that’s holding it in place, so.

 

But do you want to get onto the Superchats? We’ve covered all the topics for tonight, or most of them.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we can. You said you wanted me to pull up that Noticer article. I got it here.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we can go through a little bit of current affairs.

 

Joel Davis: So this is the woman charged with the Hezbollah flag. She looks like a ganger from Bankstown kind of thing. Sarah Mouhanna. So some Lebo [Lebanese] chick.

 

Anyway, that not a particularly interesting story, frankly, if I’m totally honest.

 

 

Thomas Sewell: But I didn’t want you to necessarily pull it up to discuss it. I just wanted, if you could pull it up. Yeah, it was a funny article.

 

Joel Davis: This is interesting.

 

Thomas Sewell: It was kind of funny that the poster girl was pretty good optics as far as Lebs [Lebanese] are concerned. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] Yeah, that’s funny. Yeah, it’s kind of weird!

 

Thomas Sewell: They were joking in the chat, like:

 

“Oh, you know, Jacob’s going through the illegal symbols. This girl’s going through the illegal symbols. Maybe they could do a stream together.”

 

Joel Davis: I don’t need any more Syrian Girl, One Struggle nonsense, I don’t think.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling] thought it was funny!

 

Joel Davis: I saw Syrian Girl got upset at me because I said, all Muslims should be deported. Or I said something like:

 

“All these sand people problems wouldn’t be our problem if we had the White Australia Policy. Like these sand people, ethnic disputes, and they should all be deported.”

 

And then she was like:

 

“Oh, but like, Zionists are terrorists, too. And the jews!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yeah, like, jews are sand people as well, to me, as well. You’re all sand people. You should all be deported!”

 

And she was happy with that. She’s like:

 

“Well, at least you’re consistent.”

 

Whatever that means.

 

But it’s like:

 

“Just get the out of my country. You’re brown!”

 

That’s kind of my attitude towards these ethnic women. I’m not interested in one struggling with from the Arab world they’re like nine or ten out of tens [in beauty] is really, like, mid at best. So it’s not even worth it.

 

[1:33:46]

 

 

 

But yeah, this abomination is in Martin Place in Sydney in the middle of the city. And this is disgusting! Because it’s like, literally 50 meters from the Lindt Café where there was an Islamic, … It was like a terrorist attack. It was like a siege. And like, two White Australian women, I believe, died in that siege. He executed one and another one died because of stray bullets in some kind of shootout exchange with the police. And now we’ve got this black Islamic cube nonsense! I mean, it’s fucking disgusting!

 

Yeah, I mean, it speaks for itself.

 

And that’s the thing, like, I talked about this and there were people getting upset at me online that, like:

 

“Oh, you’re just playing into what the jews want you to say. The jews want you to hate Muslims!”

 

It’s like, wait a second, wait a second. I don’t have to fucking accept this crap in the middle of the first city the biggest city of my country, 50 meters from where a Muslim committed a terrorist attack. I don’t have to accept this crap being built in the middle of my city. This is disgusting! Why the fuck is this alien religion having its monuments built in the middle of my city? It’s fucking absurd!

 

Like, it’s possible to fucking hate jews and Muslims at the fucking same time and want them both out at the same time. Like, I don’t have to go easy on the Muslims and just let them get away with mobilising within my society and raping White women and putting themselves about with this kind of total disrespectful bravado and just be like:

 

“Oh, yes, but, like we’re on the same side against Israel!”

 

That’s fucking cucked! Like, fuck them!

 

So, yeah, but what do you think about this monument? Do you have thoughts?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I agree with David Hiscox with his article. It is just another humiliation ritual. I saw some libtard saying:

 

“Oh there’s no need to get so offended by its only temporary.”

 

It’s like, I don’t give a fuck whether it’s temporary or not. It has no place in our society. I’m offended by it. And gone are the days where the conservative talking point, was:

 

“Oh, you know, facts don’t care about feelings, or if you’re offended by it, good.”

 

It’s like, no, what offends White people, what is egregious towards White people and White culture and our customs should be illegal, straight up. We should have the laws that the Left are trying to put in place where we can’t hurt the feelings of brown people. It should be the other way around. If you’re a foreigner and you’ve come to our country, you’re a Muslim or you’re some other, you’re not of European descent and you’ve come here, I mean, if you’re a tourist, you play the game, you play by the rules you visit the sites and you go home to your country. That, like, that’s what, I don’t know if that’s a healthy society that has tourists, but that’s what a liberal, like a White nationalist liberal democracy would have. It would have foreign tourists in it. And these people are just overstaying they’re welcome. They’re rubbing it in. They’re just looking for a fight to put those kind of displays up. And the traitors exacerbate it as. Well, I mean, as I said, once we’ve dealt with the traitors and we will deal with the traitors, once we’ve dealt with them, the Muslims and all these other ethnic groups are going to come to the table and they’re going to say:

 

“Okay, you guys are obviously pretty serious. So what are we going to do about this?”

 

You know, there’s, it’s going to be pretty straightforward. What’s going to happen? I don’t think there’s going to be, … Well, again, it depends on the timeline. It depends on the timeline.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’d be pretty easy to just put them on boats and fuck them off. The real issue is the White traitors that are holding us back and preventing us from asserting ourselves with their cuckoldry. I always say this, and it’s so important to reiterate, we can talk about the jews and other non-Whites, but ultimately what it comes down to is that we aren’t resisting this with almost any of our strength.

 

In fact, more of our race, like, our race, is doing more to contribute to our own destruction than it’s contributing to resisting it. So that’s the issue. If we got enough White people together, organised to resist it, we would easily defeat it and restore ourselves. It’s totally within our capability. We don’t need anyone but ourselves to fix this, but we need to find ourselves to fix it.

 

And right now, you know, bar, a few of us, people are like, lost, depoliticised, cucked, you know, cowardly asleep, whatever, you know whatever the case may be. And they need to be engaged, and then we can fix the problem. But that’s literally all it comes down to. It’s like it’s within the hearts and minds of the White race that this is either solved or not solved and nowhere else.

 

And that’s why I don’t believe in really giving a shit about the sensibilities of Muslims or soliciting any kind of association with them whatsoever!

 

[1:39:02]

 

And also this view that, like:

 

“Oh, we should go easy on the Muslims because hating Israel is really in right now, and we don’t want to present ourselves in a way that is going to alienate people.”

 

It’s like hating Muslims is in right now as well. Muslims didn’t become popular anytime recently. There were polls done around ten years ago on Australians attitudes to Islamic immigration. And the majority of Australians said in that poll that they want Islamic immigration completely stopped to Australia. They want a total ban on Islamic immigration. That included, like, it broke it down by party affiliation. That included like, 33% of Greens voters and 40% of Labour voters. So, like, a very substantial, like, more than a third of Left-wing voters are against Islamic immigration. That’s an old poll, but, it’s not a popular position to be pro-muslim. People don’t like them. And particularly in Europe they’re the most hated group, really, because they’re the largest and they’ve committed the most amount of crimes and then the most objectionable to deal with in public. And they’ve raped and murdered countless of our people. So, yeah that doesn’t actually make any sense. It’s actually harder to explain to the average White person the problem with jews because, yeah, White people are against Israel on the Left, but they’re not against jews. Like, they’re against “zionism”, quote unquote, which is completely different in their minds. It’s not different in reality, but it’s different in their minds.

 

So, yeah, obviously we have to educate the people about the jewish problem. But we’re going to alienate people that have patriotic sentiment, that are already kind of somewhat like spiritually aligned to our message if we don’t talk about the racial issues that they have to deal with in a more direct way that they already somewhat understand. Like, the average patriotic White Aussie already doesn’t like Muslims coming into our country. They already have an issue with the Indians.

 

And so the idea that we should sacrifice talking about that and just purely fixate upon the jews is like this autistic Internet ideology that doesn’t actually bear any resemblance to real life. And some people justify it by saying:

 

“Oh, but Goebbels said that we should just focus everything on the jew.”

 

And it’s like, yeah, it’s because in 1920s, 1930s Germany, there were no fucking Muslims! There were no pajeets! There were no chinks. Right? So why would they focus on them? They weren’t even fucking there. Like, it’s not that complicated.

 

But, yeah, anyway, we can get into the Superchats. Adolf Caesar said:

 

“Good evening, gentlemen. What are your thoughts on using Australian culture and folklore and using terms like, quote, ‘mateship’? Would that be effective rhetoric for Australian NS?”

 

What would you say to that, Tom? You’re muted.

 

Thomas Sewell: I think we’re incorporating it very well, already. You can see a lot of the speeches that I’ve done personally in the past and the things that we’ve focused on. I mean, our biggest rallies have been Australia Day in Victoria there have been things like Eureka Stockade. So we are trying to revitalise Australian folklore. We are focusing on what some would call the “Nativist angle”.

 

Jacob has even extensively worked for the last three years to revitalise the original Australian sort of folklore anthems, like the White Australia song, which was probably the second most popular song in Australia 100 years ago after the national anthem. And, yeah, I think we’re already doing a good job. Could we do more of it? Yeah, sure, we could do more of everything. I think what we have to focus on the most at the moment is, well, from a purely cultural perspective, hmm, I don’t think that’s our main focus culturally at the moment. I think our main focus socioculturally is making everyday, average Australians, working Australians, making them more politically motivated, making them politically charged. And so appealing to that kind of what is now more of a niche, well, I don’t think the purpose of us doing it is to appeal to that niche. We’re not doing it to appeal to people that have that as a personal subculture, this niche folklore, Nativist type attitude. We’re actually doing it as an act of preservation and Cultural Revolution or cultural rebirth.

 

So we’re actually doing it as a back end cultural process. Our front end is to try to capture as much attention to our important talking points, like mass deportations or living space for White people or destroy pedo freaks or whatever is. That’s our front end.

 

And then in the background, certainly, to do a cultural shift within our membership and within the people that are engaged within our politics. That’s my answer.

 

Joel Davis: Like, for me, it’s got to be organic. Like, we’re already naturally Australian, so we express our own cultural attitudes in an organic way. That’s good.

 

But then this kind of contrived, like, parochial, like, kind of harkening back to some bygone era of the stereotype of what Australiana was about. Like, that can come across as quite cringe if you’re kind of overdoing it, I think. And also it’s kind of alienating. So it has to be authentic.

 

Like, obviously we expressed our Australian character and attitude, but we don’t want to act like Boomers or whatever just to kind of recapture some old Australiana. Like, we’ve got to relate to young White people in the current era and how we conduct ourselves.

 

And I think we do that pretty successfully.

 

But, yeah, somewhat like the legacy of White Australia, though. Like, what you were talking about with Jacob, you know, trying to preserve, like, old songs and, like the phrase “Australia for the Whiteman”, that’s a classic political slogan that predates Australian Federation. Like, we believe in honouring the traditional White Australian nationalism because we’re the successors to that. Like, we inherit that tradition. And that’s spiritually very important that we connect ourselves to that because we’re trying to continue on that project of our ancestors, of our forefathers.

 

So in that sense, yeah. But this idea that we’ve got to be super parochial and use the word “mateship” all the time. I mean politicians do that. Like, you hear Anthony Albanese and shit like that talk about “mateship”, and it sounds cringe. Like, I don’t want to become some, like, cringe cliche Lord. I would rather just talk like a normal White Aussie into 2024 talks, so that people realise that I’m just like them on a certain level rather than, like, as I said some kind of contrived you know, set of cliches. I got another Superchat here from, one second, from Apollonian JL. He said:

 

“Have you read the Myth of the 20th Century by Alfred Rosenberg? And do you really think that non-northwest Europeans can assimilate into Anglo Saxon Australia?”

 

I have read the Myth of the 20th Century. I’m actually thinking of doing a podcast, or a series of podcasts on that book down the line.

 

[1:46:59]

 

So if you want to get the Joel Davis take on that text, we’re not doing it now in the Superchat, it’s too big.

 

But obviously, in that text, Rosenberg goes over, you know what he sees as the kind of unique character of the Germanic European, but he also talks about the Aryan Greeks and the similarities and differences between, like, northwest Europeans and the ancient Greeks. It’s quite an interesting discussion, and I think a lot of his assessments are accurate. And obviously, Australians are Celto-Germanic peoples. That’s what the Constitution of the nation is if you look at the data, like, on the racial demographics of White Australians, we’re, over 90% plus Celto-Germanic. There’s a little bit of Slavic and Mediterranean DNA here, but it’s a small minority.

 

So that’s the character of the nation. That’s the founding stock, and that gives our national character, and that’s what the majority of us are. And a lot of the people who have some ancestors from southern or Eastern Europe are mixed, like, with northwest European.

 

So the amount of people that are pure southern European or pure Eastern European are actually quite small, and we’re not really getting much immigration from those parts of the world now. Like, the Whites that immigrate to Australia are mostly northwest European. They’re mostly coming from Britain or Ireland, or sometimes from Germany or Scandinavia or America. They’re not really coming from those places.

 

So I would anticipate that through the generations, they’ll just become more and more fused with the founding stock population, and there won’t be very, very many pure Italians or pure Ukrainians or anything like that left in Australia.

 

So I think we should just focus on that Celto-Germanic kind of cultural foundation for understanding ourselves, and that’s what we are. And if you’re someone that has mixed ancestry or ancestry from southern or Eastern Europe, then if you want to be an Australian, you kind of have to assimilate into that. I think we can be inclusive to the ones that genuinely want to assimilate and over time, they’ll just kind of mix in with the rest of us down the generations.

 

So people might say that, like from a Puritan standpoint, that’s a big problem. I always say, though, like, if you’re a Croatian who lives in Australia and you really care more about being Croatian than you care about being Australian, I don’t personally understand why you wouldn’t move to Croatia, as an example, back to Croatia. That’s true for any group. Like, if you’re a German and you live here and you care more about Germany than Australia, why are you here? Like, I don’t really understand. Like, for me, like, I’m an Anglo Saxon, so then it’s easy for me to be like, well, Australia, because I’m of the founding stock, so I can identify with the country.

 

So I don’t really know what that’s like to feel like a kind of ethnic minority. But if I felt like Australia, I didn’t really identify with Australia as much as I identified with Britain, I would literally move to Britain and just start a life there and focus on, like, returning to the land of my ancestors, if that’s how I felt.

 

So I don’t really understand why you would like these groups that they want, like, almost Australia to become multicultural and to be:

 

“Super accepting, of Australia is not primarily an Anglo or Celto-Germanic people, it’s just European. And whether you’re Macedonian or Bulgarian or Anglo, it doesn’t matter.”

 

It does actually matter. And our national culture is a specific way for a specific reason. And if you truly love Australia, you would respect that.

 

But, yeah, the people from those places that want to embrace that, I am accepting of I’m not like, so I might get caught a cuck by the Nordicist, like, hyper Nordicist people. But I think that it doesn’t really make any sense, the position that we’re in right now, to be alienating those people if they’re going to fight for our race and for White Australia alongside us, they are pretty similar to us. Like, they are of the same race as us, even if they’re of a different subgroup of the race. It doesn’t existentially threaten who we are to be inclusive to them. Like, it just simply doesn’t.

 

Whereas being inclusive to non-Whites does. Like, that literally completely undermines the racial character.

 

So that’s how I see it. But if they get offended by that idea that shows that they’ve got a hostility. If you’re someone of Italian descent and you’re getting offended that I’m saying Australia was founded by Anglo Saxons and that it’s a Celto-Germanic nation, then I’m sorry, you need to fucking go! You’re part of the problem! Because you literally don’t respect Australia, you don’t fucking respect our national history. And the literal, like, racial stock that founded the fucking country! Like, so you’re basically an anti-Australian. You know, you have the mentality of these other non-White immigrants, basically. You’re trying to undermine Australia’s identity to fit you. And you’re getting angry at a founding stock Australian for having my own identity and asserting it. So you have to join our team. We don’t have to join your team. That’s the way I see it. Tom probably doesn’t want to go into that. We’ve answered that question too many times. RSA Liberty, …

 

[1:52:44]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the fifth time we’ve had that question.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. RSA Liberty said:

 

“Fuhrer, is the first hundred man march going to be the next national meet? Issue the order!”

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling] I hope that that’s someone that’s involved in the organisation asking that question. I won’t go into too many details, but we have been doing account of who we think we can put forward.

 

And obviously that’s not including the recruitment that we’re going to have between now and then. I think the next national is going to be very impressive. I’ll leave it at that. I’m not going to say a number because it’s still in the air, but., …

 

Joel Davis: It’s always difficult getting everyone in the country to go to one place like that. Always presents challenges.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, recruitment’s been good and it’s looking good!

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m sure if it was a Zoom call, if it was a Zoom call, national meetup, we’d have a thousand people on the Zoom call. But because it’s not a Zoom call and there’s a lot of logistics involved, and cost as well. A lot of our members are young and it’s a big cost to travel to the other side of Australia or whatever, but we try to make it a holiday, we try to make it an adventure as well. So that way that they’re getting something out of it at a personal level, not just as a concept of duty.

 

So it’ll be impressive. I hope you’re involved and yeah, January is some time away. It’s over three months away. So if guys want to get involved between now and then you’re going to have to be involved for probably a couple weeks, or a couple months to be able to get the orders for where it is so get involved now. At this stage, it’s mostly under wraps. Will we go public? Maybe a couple weeks, or a month out? Maybe there’s a chance we’ve done that in the past, certainly with two of the national meets in Victoria. We went public with it. Obviously, Sydney and Brisbane weren’t. We didn’t go public with it until the last minute that we were there. And that’s just because if you look at the pressure, the police pressure we had.

 

So, anyway, I’ll leave it there. I won’t go any further. But you better be involved, [word unclear], if you’re going to make comments like that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, come to nationals. Like, get involved now. You come to nationals, you’ll get to see Tom fight someone in the ring. I’ll fight someone. Blair said he wanted to get into a punch on at nationals in the ring. So you get to watch your favourite streamers punch on IRL. Racist UFC. It’s Keno.

 

Thomas Sewell: A whole weekend of racism!

 

Joel Davis: We’re gonna have a lot of fun, so, yeah, obviously we’ll be doing some activism. I’m not looking forward, to be honest, at the 10k run.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: But got to do it. Got to smash it out!

 

Thomas Sewell: Get ready for the 10k run. I did a 4K run tonight and it wasn’t at a good speed, I’ll tell you that. But it actually, it felt fine. It was easy to do it. I just wasn’t very fast. So I’m hoping to drop ten kilos and get my speed back.

 

Joel Davis: I did it. I did a I just did a 2.4, like, locally tonight and, yeah, it wasn’t too bad. Yeah. But I’m nowhere near the fitness level that I’ll be at nationals. Because over the wintertime, we haven’t really been running. I’ve just been lifting weights and putting on, like, chungus. You know, I might look a little less bulked because I literally lost, like, eight kilos in the last month because I’ve just been trying to cut weight so I can get my run time up and we’re getting back into kickboxing and stuff. And, yeah, I was punching harder, but I was punching harder for 45 seconds, and then I was starting to breathe heavy. So what’s the point? [chuckling]

 

Fellow Comrade said:

 

“Buy yourselves a based, racist looking sandwich or an extra racist, wholesome chungus roast cooked by someone’s grandma.”

 

Well, I don’t think grandma is charging $10 to eat roast. You know, that’s why we love the grandmas, because the grandmas they got a, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe we can get a bottle of San Pellegrino or something for when we go visit grandma.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we got to take something. We got to take little chocolates or something for Grandma.

 

Thomas Sewell: Grandma wants chocolate.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but, like, these days, with inflation, a $10 sandwich? Get the fuck! Get the hell out of here! You’re not buying anything. Like, what is this, 2018? Like, yeah, the jews have fucked us. Immigration has fucked us. You know, you can’t buy a sandwich for less than $20 now. It’s ridiculous! That’s not your fault, of course.

 

But as I said, I blame the jews. I blame ZOG. Fuck ZOG!

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe I should get a racist sandwich with that Max Caruso guy?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s obviously a reference to that Max Caruso interview that you did a few years ago.

 

[1:57:36]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I hope he puts up the full interview. Not the full interview, but, yeah, the snippet he put up was very small. Like, there was one point where he was saying, like, he was asking if he has to go back to Italy. This kind of ties in with that long winded question that we answer every stream. But he said:

 

“Do I have to go back to Italy?”

 

And I was like:

 

“What are you talking about?”

 

And he goes:

 

“Well, I’m not White. I’m Italian.”

 

I was like:

 

“What? What are you talking about?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Well, isn’t that how it is? Like, are Italians White?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Man, you’re doing the meme. Do you really feel that way? Do you feel like you’re not White? Do you feel like you’re much different to me?”

 

And he was like:

 

“Oh, I don’t know. I never really thought about, are Italians White?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Man, I didn’t realise you were Italian. I mean, obviously your last name’s Caruso, so I figured you were like, you had some sort of Mediterranean influence in you, but, yeah, like, it’s cool, bro. You can stay. Like, you’re White. You and any Italian that acts and behaves and looks like you can stay. You’re all right. You’re one of the boys.”

 

And he was like:

 

“Oh, cool. Well, yeah, maybe I can get on board with this is all right!”

 

That’s pretty funny. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: That’s probably why he didn’t put it in the video, because he didn’t want to come across as too sympathetic.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he would have cut that.

 

Joel Davis: But I saw he uploaded, because he uploaded to YouTube, and it did reasonably well, but then he uploaded a section of it to TikTok, and that went crazy on TikTok! It got like last time I checked, like, 300k views or something so maybe it’s more now, I don’t know. I haven’t even checked back in. So Tik Tok is great for viral racist content. Hitler’s going viral on TikTok. TikTok had to shut down all the Hitler speeches because they kept going insane! And it became a meme where people would be like put the Hitler English AI translation, and they’d be, like, dubbing it with their face, but then putting them in the humourous situations where they’re upset at their girlfriend or waiting in line or they’re in these frustrating, you know, interpersonal situations, and they’re just channeling, like, Hitler’s rage! And that just became the new TikTok trend. 2024 is cool! [chuckling]

 

When we sat on the show a few months ago, the vibe has shifted. Some people doubted it, but there’s no doubting that the vibe has shifted. The vibe has definitely shifted.

 

Yeah. What else we got here in the someone Odysee. In Reality said:

 

“Finally catching a live stream. It’s early morning where I’m at. Thank you both for the education and inspiration. Hail our people!”

 

Well, thanks, In reality. Glad you enjoyed the stream. And GoyBoy1488 said:

 

“He’s taken a week off politics, but he wanted to pop in and support his favourite Aussies. How do we feel about small breaks? Does that go against the quote? ‘We will never slacken, never tire.’ See you next week.”

 

Thomas Sewell: You got to be tactical. You got to be tactical with your breaks. You got to have a reset. You got a rest between sets. Yeah.

 

Because if you don’t have small breaks, you’ll break. You’ll like the whole point of having these small breaks. Sorry, I’m being distracted. I can hear Luna calling my name, which is odd for her. I don’t know why she’s talking in her sleep. Well, she’s not asleep. She’s already woken up.

 

But, yeah, now you can’t, … The first couple of years I was involved with politics, I went really hard, and I learnt very quickly that you kind of, it affects your mental capacity, it affects your intelligence, it affects your stress levels. You have to learn to enjoy the struggle. And that’s one of the important principles of this, is that it’s a marathon, not a sprint, and you have to learn how to enjoy it. You have to learn how to take time off and deload and rest, and you come back better! You come back a lot better.

 

But most people don’t even do enough to take a break. Most people just need to change their lifestyle so that they can afford more energy towards nationalism, because 99% of people that consider themselves nationalists, don’t actually do anywhere near what they’re capable of doing. It’s not them that needs breaks. They need lifestyle changes so that more of their effort is dedicated towards nationalism, which starts with getting involved in real life.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’m someone that doesn’t take a lot of breaks and just kind of keep, like, chipping away at things with, yeah, very seldom do I actually. And maybe that’s bad. Maybe I should recharge the battery sometime, because, I don’t know, that’s more my approach, kind of just keep plugging away.

 

But it’s a personality thing. Some people really need time on their own. And I know, for example, Blair is like that. Because Blair is someone who, he’s got a lot of energy output, so if he can kind of burn himself out very quickly. He’s got to manage his energy distribution. So it’s a personality thing.

 

[2:02:49]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I benefit a lot from being alone. Like, I’ve noticed that the greatest periods of political growth, like, sorry, not political growth, but personal growth. The greatest personal growth that I’ve been through has been when I’ve been alone, not just prison, but just in general.

 

So I think being alone, truly alone, like, without distraction, is extremely important for personal growth. And that would be considered a break because for me, one of the biggest parts, I don’t have a massive social battery.

 

So one of the biggest parts of nationalism that’s quite taxing for me is dealing with lots of humans. I wouldn’t say I’m extroverted or introverted. I’m probably in the middle somewhere, but you have to be pretty extroverted to be a political character, a political leader. And a lot of people., … Look, if there’s 200 people that want your time, you don’t have 200 people’s worth of time.

 

And a lot of people, they want your time. They know who you are, they admire you or they respect you or whatever, or they just want to have a conversation with you. But you don’t have 200 people’s time for them. You have you have one 200th of a person’s time for them. And that, not to be rude. When I first got sort of like popular or famous, however you want to put it, infamous. Like, when my Telegram went from like 200 followers to like 15,000 or something, I noticed that a lot in, whenever I was online, I would just get so many DM’s, and it got to the point where I had to take my Direct Messenger off my public Telegram.

 

That’s why it’s not on my public Telegram anymore. If, you know what it is, you know what it is, but I don’t advertise it anymore because I don’t want direct messages. You either want to get involved or you don’t. I just don’t have time. I mean, I was talking to Joel about Twitter recently, and he keeps telling me to get my Twitter back up. But again, like, having the Twitter DM’s open is like as soon as I opened the Twitter DM’s, just immediately it started flooding in. And it’s just paragraphs and paragraphs and paragraphs, and it’s all good faith. It’s all people wanting advice and people explaining how they’re inspired and this is what they want to do. And it’s awesome! It’s awesome stuff!

 

But, yeah, I just try to direct people towards like, a local representative or local leader because, yeah, otherwise I’ll burn out. I’ve done it before. I’ve done it in the past. I’ve responded to every single message. I mean, I’ve got about. Shit! I can show you my phone. I got like 999 unread personal messages on my phone. I just don’t open personal messages anymore unless they’re from, like, someone that I know or deal with in person or they’re a representative of a movement already. I just don’t have the energy for. I’ll burn out! I’ll burn out and I’ll have to go hide in my room for like, three days and not come out. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I think I have a little bit more social battery than you to an extent.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, you do you do.

 

Joel Davis: But even still, I get overwhelmed as well by the same thing. People really, they expect your time. Like, they expect you to. Like, okay, they get offended. It’s like you don’t understand the amount, the sheer quantity of people that are trying to talk to me all the time. It just becomes overwhelming and then I just lose track of it. Like it just gets dropped. It just goes into vertical scroll. And it happens even to my own family or my own friends. Like, I’ll see they message me and be like:

 

“Oh, I’ve got to go back to that.”

 

And then just so much crap fills everything up that I just forget to check back in.

 

Thomas Sewell: I still get probably half a dozen random messages a day. But it’s a huge improvement in the quality of the messages, certainly, I think, because you can only get my direct message through someone that already knows it. So that helps. Unless they’re just lucky and they just search it.

 

Yeah, I’m gonna call it a night.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah, we’re done. This is the last Superchat is just a statement. A Hitler quote from Keep Asking for Truth, saying:

 

“From my dead body, my spirit will rise again and people will know that I was right.”

 

And I guess we can end it there. Also saw Hitler’s Big Toe asking me if I was drinking breast milk. No, it was raw milk.

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: You know, if I had this much breast milk, I’d give it a crack and see how it is. I’ll give you a review. I could do a review bro on breast milk, but I don’t have a pregnant wife at the moment. I wouldn’t want to be drinking some random bitches breast milk. That’s weird!

 

So anyway, we’ll end the show there.

 

Thomas Sewell: No comment on the breast milk question. No comment! Good night. Hail Hitler!

 

Joel Davis: See you guys later.

 

[2:07:49]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of Oct 8, 2024 = 151)

HyperChat min: 100

@BMC1488
4 days ago
Australia for the White Man! o//

8
1
jojoNora
2 days ago
I wish we could clone a Joel for each Western country.

3
1
Hide replies
MrWebster
1 day ago
same can be said for Tom and Blair!

1
0

@katana17
3 days ago
Here’s the transcript:
[Joel Davis – Political Existentialism, Zionist Hypocrisy, Austrians Vote for Remigration – Oct 3, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – Political Existentialism, Zionist Hypocrisy, Austrians Vote for Remigration – Oct 3, 2024 – Transcript

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Tom Sewell discuss the following:
Blair was unable to join the stream due to other commitments.
Discuss recent events in Israel, including bombing campaigns in Lebanon and Iranian missile strikes on Israel.
Express concern about potential escalation leading to US intervention: “that could escalate into a full on war in the region with Iran.”
Criticize conservative politicians’ strong defense of Israel and Jews.
Jewish interests have too much influence on Australian politics: “jewish elite capture of our political institutions.”
Discuss the US National Guard being deployed to the Middle East instead of helping with domestic disasters.
They note a shift in public sentiment since previous Middle East conflicts.
Express approval of Iran bombing Israel: “It was good to see Israel getting bombed by some proper ballistic missiles.”
Discuss the difficulty Iran faces in significantly damaging Israel due to geographical constraints.
Analyze Israel’s military options against Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Dscuss the Freedom Party of Austria’s electoral success and radical anti-immigration platform.
Express optimism about the rise of nationalist parties across Europe.
Criticize the lack of effective nationalist political options in Australia.
Discuss their approach to white nationalism and racial identity in Australia.
Argue for focusing on Australia’s Anglo-Celtic and Germanic heritage while being somewhat inclusive of other European ethnicities.
Discuss plans for future nationalist gatherings and activism in Australia.
Emphasize the importance of in-person organizing over online activism.
More, …
Less

1
1
Mr
4 days ago
Q: After the zombie apocalypse occurs and Western Civilization collapses, where do Joel Davis followers think that White civilization will rise and re-establish itself as the globe’s premiere society….Europe, North America, or Australia?

2
0
The Crucible 01
4 days ago
Keith woods is a pseudo intellectual pussy, and even maybe a grifter.

6
4
Hide replies

@popovacianen
4 days ago
are they talking about him? you have a time stamp by any chance?

Hide replies
The Crucible 01
4 days ago
umm gee like watch the stream

1
3
Hide replies

@popovacianen
4 days ago
umm gee thanks for nothing lol

0
1
Hide replies
The Crucible 01
4 days ago
umm gee your welcome lol

The Crucible 01
4 days ago(edited)
Honestly cant remember where they mentioned him, 45 minutes in i think. lol

Wesselmania
4 days ago
full-on “grifter” is a stretch.. his weakness is fame-seeking

Heartland
3 days ago
Keith puts his head above the anti-white parapet. What do you do to defend the white race?

Hide replies
The Crucible 01
3 days ago
oh of course because i dont make streams i dont do enough in defense of my race, piss off with that dribble, I could ask you the same question. On fact let me ask you this does Keith get money for what he does?

InReality
4 days ago
review “bra” get it?

1
1
MrWebster
15 hours ago(edited)
Tom and Joel think I am too extreme and insane on this. But basically I believe once Us White nationalist retake our own nations again and deport all the Non Whites out our Nations. We as Whites must then think in a Supramacist and World Conquering vision. Where we will have no choice but to create an Anti white Ethnic artificial disease that makes all whites on Earth immune to this disease. But once this disease is released on all corners of planet earth. Once invented and released against non whites, it will wipe out more than 70% of all Non whites on earth. After the first sucessful wipeout run, we as whites would need to siege all non white Nuclear and Weapons cache arsenal before they can use it against us. We will have to in next couple of years wipe out the last non whites vestiges on planet earth down to the last single Man, Woman and child towards total genetic Extinction. We will have to also eliminate all genitic tissue dna of non whites, preserving non white DNA will be a very treasonous crime resulting in executions. We all have to come to the final solution as white people that all non whites have to be driven towards extinction to ensure White Survival in 21st century. There is no alternative to this solution. They want us extinct, we should drive their extinction. Peaceful/tolerant coexistence is mere deception and illusion.
Less

1
0
Smokey
4 days ago
I feel this chat is a little boring now. Why no comments?

1
0
Weltenesche
8 hours ago
It shows you don’t know too much about Austrian politics. The Freedom Party is extremely philosemetic and their leadership makes regular trips to Israel. They’re also civnats and have put out ads about how “great” it is that Turks are voting for them and how Turks are welcome and accepted in the Freedom Party. Honestly the best advertisements for the Freedom Party came from the Greens and the Liberals, comparing Kickl to Hitler

Heartland
3 days ago
1:05:32
is that raw milk Thomas is drinking?! >>> !

Archipelago Woes
4 days ago
o/

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
🏆Joel🏆Tom🏆

InReality
4 days ago
o/

Randall_Waffen
4 days ago
o/

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
wp

DOLO
4 days ago
o/

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
ooops

InReality
4 days ago

@Smokey
It’s a public forum. Why don’t you try to add something of value to the conversation? Be the change you wish to see instead of whining.

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
lol

InReality
4 days ago
That’s ironic.

InReality
4 days ago

@Smokey
are you serious? Weren’t you just comment policing just a min ago? Very feminine behavior.

DOLO
4 days ago
lol

InReality
4 days ago
I’m excited to see!

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@smokey
Mostly replying but I’ll shurrup now o7 o/

Secure the future of our people
4 days ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram)
⚡️⚡️
https://x.com/joeldavisx
⚡️⚡️
https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell
⚡️⚡️
https://x.com/b_cottrell89
⚡️⚡️

InReality
4 days ago
“i feel like” lol

Smokey
4 days ago

@InReality
Okay, thanks.

InReality
4 days ago

@Smokey
speak up then, bub!

Smokey
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning

@InReality
I feel like you’re dominating the chat. Why not lot other people post a comment?

InReality
4 days ago
We should call raw milk “white powerade”. Not sure if Aussies know what Powerade is but it’s an American sports drink.

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
Didn’t some “Turks” try to blow up a railway in Ballarat circa 1920?

InReality
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
cheers

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@InReality
IKR? I removed the comments btw.

InReality
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
can you imagine the media scrambling to decide what to say about that? “Do we support the muslims or the lgbtp???”

ThinRedLine
4 days ago
howdy

WaffleStake
4 days ago
i haven’t seen a non white in tent cities full of white Australians

InReality
4 days ago

@CampsLindburgh
kebabs

WaffleStake
4 days ago
pain

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
god?

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
what’s in the box

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Lindt cafe siege

InReality
4 days ago
White World Policy

Smokey
4 days ago
Does Syrian Girl live in Australia still?

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
All in one? I’ll have a look 👍

WaffleStake
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
Alex Linder did that one too

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
Pete Quinones on Odysee did a reading of “Camp of the Saints”. It’s in his playlist.

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Palmer is the archetypal example of the goy billionaire wasting his wealth on vanity project

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
Camp of Saints, horrifying in some ways. but also it describes the fruits of the do-gooder mentality, overrun by the stinking muds, which is kind of satisfying

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
Many have Brazilian links, geneticaly. Ditto with Chinese ancestry. Look at world maps & it makes sense.

InReality
4 days ago
Austria: home of the original leader!

WaffleStake
4 days ago
in Tassie?

InReality
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
That’s how it starts, huh.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
now we have the inbred rapey ones

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
we had those more white seeming ones about 10 years ago

WaffleStake
4 days ago
on the other hand all the “kiwis” we have are islanders, not Anglo

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
no need to go to India when India comes to you…

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
They’ll be Brahmans – the richer caste.

WaffleStake
4 days ago
i agree that they shouldn’t be here simply because this isn’t their country

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Queensland is the suburbs. There are lots of them here to be sure, but they seem to be white presenting in their behaviour for the most part.

InReality
4 days ago
FORTRESS EUROPE NOW

DOLO
4 days ago
Rohem was the leader of the SA before the putsch

WaffleStake
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
How can they be part Brazilian?

@CampsLindburgh
4 days ago
needs a completely different moral foundation. with pro-14 words as 1st principle

Secure the future of our people
4 days ago
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Help this channel grow! Repost and like the Twitter if you can guys.
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1841790466012102935
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Secure the future of our people
4 days ago
o/

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
Maori aren’t merely Polynesian. They were part Brazilian & Chinese before they also miscegenated with Europeans.

InReality
4 days ago
Love the milk

BASEDVLAD
4 days ago
White Power Drink \o

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@DawnBrowning
no, I’ve heard of it tho. sounds horrifying

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
True 🤣 Have you read Camp of the Saints?

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
Have you been to India/Pak/Bang?

InReality
4 days ago
The level of focused seriousness and decorum these Aussie’s have is really appealing to me.

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
English politics is the option of being fucked from the front or from behind 🤷‍♂️

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
Ah right. I’m not sure which state, but I’m not sure how you’ve avoided the smelly lower caste Indians who ruin every public space

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
all it takes is proper internet censorship & its game over 👉🎮💨

InReality
4 days ago
Low-caste Indians especially are rapey, scamming street shitters.

WaffleStake
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
Australia

Dawn Browning
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
Until beef isn’t allowed on your BBQ?

InReality
4 days ago
One of the things that did it for me was all the indian scammer videos on youtube. And the travel vlogs. Check out Bald and Bankrupt’s latest video on India

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
which country are you in, Waffle?

WaffleStake
4 days ago
personally I haven’t had problems with Indians but my personal experience is irrelevant

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
Yeah Indians are disgusting

InReality
4 days ago
I have to say, I have a particular distaste for Indians.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
there are more Asians in New Zealand than Maoris

DOLO
4 days ago
Yeah, it’ll be Indians at a guess

@TheGreatWillDo
4 days ago
Hello 🫵 London 🤷‍♂️

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
Indians

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Asian, islanders

DOLO
4 days ago

@InReality
Hobits

InReality
4 days ago
wtf??? NZ 55% white? Who is moving there, asians?

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
The THEY are already tying themselves in their own knots.

DOLO
4 days ago
Trump also said that America needs more legal migrants.

Dawn Browning
4 days ago
No need for a drivers licence if you can’t legally pay for one? Hmmmm.

InReality
4 days ago

@GoyBoy1488
Even Hitler had the Berghof. Everyone needs to recharge the vital energies.

@GoyBoy1488
4 days ago

@InReality
o/

InReality
4 days ago

@GoyBoy1488
o/ have a nice break

@GoyBoy1488
4 days ago
$14.88
taking a week off of politics, but wanted to pop in an support my favorite Ausies. How do you two feel about small breaks? Does that go against “we will never slacken, never tire…”? See you next week!

InReality
4 days ago
I assume that the Germans who thought that the NSDAP were too extreme and unoptical probably changed their minds once life got a lot better for them because of Hitler.

@TimeToWakeUp
4 days ago
Whatever “evils” Whites are capable of, non-whites would do in a worse fashion ten times over

Svxdrifter
4 days ago

@lewpers
💯

@lewpers
4 days ago
The mudslimes are not going home until the jew issue is solved first, never forget that. As such, the latter is technically the more pressing issue.

InReality
4 days ago
Daniel’s statement is very telling.

InReality
4 days ago
$20.00
Finally catching a live stream! It’s early morning where I’m at. Thank you both for the education and inspiration. Hail our people! ✋️😎

Harry Holler
4 days ago
with zero sense of irony

Harry Holler
4 days ago
Joel, Barry Weiss accused the Qataris as “having dual loyalty”.

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Then ASIO is turned against the White population

InReality
4 days ago
What’s up, based Aryan chads?

Whiterabbit
4 days ago
Frank Lowy was in the Irgun who shot British soldiers

DanTheOracle💯🥛🇦🇺👌🏻
4 days ago
plus russia runs their own missile protections in both iran and syria from what i understand

DanTheOracle💯🥛🇦🇺👌🏻
4 days ago

@WaffleStake
yea russia gave them their new fighter jets not long ago and they already have i think its s400 missile protection

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
Macron lost ‘3rd place’ yet he still rules, you are not going to vote your way out of this.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
i thought it said Australia voted for remigration. i was getting excited

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
WE just saw this take place in France

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
first

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
Even though Austria voted, make no mistake about it, the Globohomo will circle the wagons and not allow them to lead, 30% verses the traitors.

@katana17
4 days ago
Transcript of last week’s show:

Joel Davis – Building Nationalism from the Ground Up – Sep 26, 2024 – Transcript

DanTheOracle💯🥛🇦🇺👌🏻
4 days ago
o/

DanTheOracle💯🥛🇦🇺👌🏻
4 days ago
hello lads

@lewpers
4 days ago
Isn’t Atomwaffen all feds too? Pretty sure they were exposed during a court case, unless I’m wrong.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
bt?

WaffleStake
4 days ago
Iran probably has advanced Russian anti air defenses which would make the Americans think twice

@lewpers
4 days ago
The importance of Iran’s strike is that it has now showed the world that Israel is far from invincible, and without the JEWSA it’d fall overnight.

@TASMANIANDEVIL
4 days ago
that was a good stream with the Israeli sperg

DanTheOracle💯🥛🇦🇺👌🏻
4 days ago

@WhiteWalker
hitler tried to not vote his way out of this… he completely failed before quite literally voting his way out of this… change my mind?

Hide replies
DOLO
4 days ago
You could argue that was one of the main reason that the vote even worked to begin with. The way Degrelle describes it, the failed putsch sort of turned Hitler into a rock star, and i can see that being the case, but don’t forget that the officials were largely on his side as well. Famously the judge at his trial actually sympathized with Hitler, but obviously that wouldn’t happen now.
Funny take though because it’s basically true what you’re saying.

Hide replies
DanTheOracle💯🥛🇦🇺👌🏻
4 days ago
“You could argue that was one of the main reason that the vote even worked”
ok lets argue it…
how many people took power in 1923 vs 1833?
how many people died in 1923 vs 1933 to take power? like, what is the percentage? the ratio between power taken to the loss of your own supporters?
how much more power did the commies get in 1923 vs 1933 because of the putsch?
when were more volumes of mein kampf put into peoples hands? 1923 or a decade later in 1933?
what single positive thing came about because of 1923? you quite literally cant even name one can you?
Less

DanTheOracle💯🥛🇦🇺👌🏻
4 days ago
“The way Degrelle describes it, the failed putsch sort of turned Hitler into a rock star”
is degrelle here to debate with? because i would be more than happy to debate him on this… but i think ultimately the thing that made hitler a “rock star” wasnt the putsch, it was his unscheduled speech before the DAP long before it even became the NSDAP…. he was sent there by the german government to “spy”on political parties to ensure they werent commies, after a commie gave a speech as to why they should become more marist to the workers, hitler was so incensed he got up to leave in disgust and gave a 15 minute “off the cuff” unscripted speech on how wrong marxists were…. the head of the DAP didnt just want hitler to join his “beer hall” party… but signed the party over to hitler on the spot….
you think that hitler just voting in the beer halls of the time had more or less of an outcome than his speech that won him the whole party?
how many people died in the putsch vs his beer hall speech? what, ultimately won hitler more power? losing members in the putsch? or winning over a whole party without losing even a single member and taking power in the party? im pretty confident i know which was more important.
“Funny take though because it’s basically true what you’re saying.”
yea the idea wasnt to agree with me… it wasnt even just to argue with me… it was to change my mind that sitting at home in your basement doing nothing is somehow better than simply voting.. simply voting isnt going to replace them… you need to take as much power anywhere you can while voting is the only thing that will work…
Less

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago
is degrelle here to debate with?
He doesn’t need to be, he wrote several books, why don’t you read them and stop sperging out, faggot.

0
1
Hide replies
DanTheOracle💯🥛🇦🇺👌🏻
3 days ago
loooooool fucking owned.
youre the one who was trying to form an argument for it… i simply called you out on your retarded bullshit… i dont need nor want to make your argument for you, youre ment to have the IQ to do that yourself, you completely failed.
nigger level intelligence…

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago(edited)
The city of Munich had been stirred to intense feelings for Hitler after the failure of the putsch. There had been not the least sign of solidarity with Kahr and Lossow and their people. In powerless rage, they had pounced on the movement that had made them tremble. Its offices had been closed, the Vélkischer Beobachter banned and all its assets seized. But the harder they hit, the more indignation they aroused. “For some days,” writes Benoist-Méchin, “the people, prey to a strange agitation, have been roaming the streets singing patriotic songs and booing von Kahr.”
“The streets of the city,” adds historian Pierre Soisson, “resounded with enthusiastic cries of Deutschland Erwache (‘Germany Awake’] and ‘Heil Hitler’.” On the day after Hitler’s imprisonment, a referendum was organized at the university. Reproducing the official report of this opinion poll will tell it best: “Meeting at the university: 70 percent for Hitler, 20 percent von Kahr, 10 percent indifferent.
Less

Hide replies
DanTheOracle💯🥛🇦🇺👌🏻
3 days ago
wheres degalle so i can answer him and his point? can ya run and grab him for a moment? i would love to explain to him how wrong he is and why exactly hes wrong…

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago
Now you’re making yourself look like an idot. Look up who Léon Degrelle is before making a comment like that.

Hide replies
DanTheOracle💯🥛🇦🇺👌🏻
3 days ago
lool its hilarious. only a midwit cant work out im using the absurdity to point out your stupidity…
you really think someone like me does not know about degrelles work, life and arguments for and against his positions?
the fact is im so used to easily winning these little debates and you midwit always end up going “oh yea? well read this thing i read and that will tell you why youre wrong” but in reality i can explain to you why your interpretation of their views
and opinions are wrong and do it in my own words without having to rely on a midwit like you not reading someone elses work to see my point….
but i guess being so new to this you have not worked out how it works or your own views
rather than just parrot someone elses….
Less

Hide replies
DOLO
3 days ago
Literally nobody is debating. It’s just you sperging out. There is a difference.

0
1
Continue Thread
WaffleStake
4 days ago
Drew Pavlou is a Gunt Guard for Zionism

@WhiteWalker
4 days ago
That national guard if I understand correctly is actually from the disaster area, it’s disgusting.

@KeepAskingForTruth
4 days ago
$3.88
From my dead body my spirit will rise again and people will know that I was right.

Tendie Research Room
4 days ago
are they late?

0
0

===================

RUMBLE COMMENTS (41) as of Oct 8, 2024.

Dan762
4 days ago
we need yall in America or we need to colab
10 likes

autonomousthought
4 days ago
The argument about Africans not trading their minerals to us is wrong. In a natural state whites could dominate the world through trade alone. Africans would absolutely trade their minerals to us, and for what would be something of miniscule value to whites, just like when we traded with Native Americans. They’d be living in even more squalor than they are now. Keith wasn’t pleading with brown people arguing that we’re nice and can get along. He made a basic argument for self determination of different peoples. Counter signaling that is really weird and dumb
8 likes

› Show 5 replies
WhiteBloke
4 days ago
Rumble is pumping more ads on the replay that fkn jewtube. Unreal.
8 likes

› Show 1 reply
katana17
4 days ago
Last week’s transcript: [Joel Davis – Building Nationalism from the Ground Up – Sep 26, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/28/joel-davis-building-nationalism-from-the-ground-up-sep-26-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: The show has expanded its audience significantly by broadcasting on Twitter. They’ve grown their audience despite being deplatformed from YouTube. They talk about the upcoming Australian Football League grand final weekend, and critique the commercialization and politicization of Australian football, while discussing the potential for politicizing sports for nationalist causes. They discuss the concept of building nationalism from the ground up, and argue that existing institutions have failed and a new movement needs to be built from scratch. Emphasize the importance of organizing white men around a “no compromise white nationalism.” Discuss strategies for building a parallel economy and community for their activists and the need for physical spaces and property for the movement. The challenges of fundraising and managing finances for their organization and the importance of transparency and accountability in handling donations. They critique excessive moralizing and ideological debates within the nationalist movement, and argue for a focus on racial identity as the foundation for their movement, despite the challenges of uniting different factions within white nationalism. National Socialism and its relevance today and strategies for normalizing their ideology and breaking the “spell” of anti-Nazi sentiment. The importance of building a distinctly Australian form of nationalism. The need for white people to collectively fund pro-white organizations and the potential for creating nationalist labor unions. The challenges of digital currencies and financial deplatforming. And more, …
4 likes

Delete
Motion937
3 days ago
I disagree somewhat with Joel when he mentioned Trump supporters in the USA who are rural vs. city dwellers…with city dwellers being more concerned about immigration. I am in a more rural area & am hard core anti-immigration. We are less soft on immigration. In the cities people are actually too tolerant of it. To the point that they are less likely to say anything because of persecution. It puts a target on your back by people who hate you. So people keep quiet about it. The whole thing is complicated. Very much like having friend groups, where the viewpoint changes depending on the quality of people you are associating with. Which is why a larger movement has to grow here so we are not in our little boxes. It needs to become the standard position for all our neighbors as well. I appreciate what you guys are doing, & I follow your channel from here in the USA.
2 likes

IvarHalfdansson
3 days ago
why are they always drinking milk?? weird
1 like

‹ Hide 3 replies
Motion937
2 days ago
Because being healthy & strong is better than being weak. Wanting to be weak is weird.
2 likes

PansophicGothi
2 days ago
It does seem kind of forced lol. Also it’s just the Aryans drinking milk meme from 2016. HWNDU ‼️ 😂
2 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
because it’s good
1 like

PeroErcegovac
3 days ago
Joel is absolutely correct. Croats who feel for Croatia should come home as to be Australian one must be Anglo Celtic. You Dinaric Croats have to come home to Croatia. We need you and it is the best way to say thank you to the Aussies for giving us shelter post WWII. Do it. I did it. Only from our homelands can we truly network and create lasting alliances.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motion937
2 days ago
It would be nice to have you debate or have a conversation with people in the USA like Ben Shapiro to help people gain perspective that they are deprived of. Ben doesn’t have a problem with the USA being subverted with racial demographics & thinks ideology is all that matters. I disagree & align with your way of thinking far more. It would be nice to see you talk with him to help wake people up in the USA as to how cucked we have become. I don’t see that happening because as the Jews have already said before they began their subversion tactics, “Never again.” Well, I would like to get to the point where White Anglo Saxons finally say, “Never again.” Then enforce it with a zero tolerance policy.
1 like

Rockwell1488Pierce
4 days ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram)!!! ⚡️⚡️ https://x.com/joeldavisx ⚡️⚡️ https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell ⚡️⚡️ https://x.com/b_cottrell89 ⚡️⚡️
0 likes

Alimac801
3 days ago
I was a member of the Australian Libertarian Party. I know them well,attended many fundraisers:Ross Cameron and John Ruddick are total zionists and want to engage jewish money.
0 likes

katana17
3 days ago
Here’s the transcript: [Joel Davis – Political Existentialism, Zionist Hypocrisy, Austrians Vote for Remigration – Oct 3, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/10/04/joel-davis-political-existentialism-zionist-hypocrisy-austrians-vote-for-remigration-oct-3-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Tom Sewell discuss the following: Blair was unable to join the stream due to other commitments. Discuss recent events in Israel, including bombing campaigns in Lebanon and Iranian missile strikes on Israel. Express concern about potential escalation leading to US intervention: “that could escalate into a full on war in the region with Iran.” Criticize conservative politicians’ strong defense of Israel and Jews. Jewish interests have too much influence on Australian politics: “jewish elite capture of our political institutions.” Discuss the US National Guard being deployed to the Middle East instead of helping with domestic disasters. They note a shift in public sentiment since previous Middle East conflicts. Express approval of Iran bombing Israel: “It was good to see Israel getting bombed by some proper ballistic missiles.” Discuss the difficulty Iran faces in significantly damaging Israel due to geographical constraints. Analyze Israel’s military options against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Dscuss the Freedom Party of Austria’s electoral success and radical anti-immigration platform. Express optimism about the rise of nationalist parties across Europe. Criticize the lack of effective nationalist political options in Australia. Discuss their approach to white nationalism and racial identity in Australia. Argue for focusing on Australia’s Anglo-Celtic and Germanic heritage while being somewhat inclusive of other European ethnicities. Discuss plans for future nationalist gatherings and activism in Australia. Emphasize the importance of in-person organizing over online activism. More, …
0 likes

Delete
PansophicGothi
2 days ago
Saying that we’re going to dominate the globe and take whatever we want from everyone is not just bad optics, it’s a non-starter. You will never find a useful percentage of White people in the modern world to agree with that. It’s an edgelord position at this point. As someone else said, we can get whatever we want through trade, and cheaply. Besides that nothing is really exclusive that white people don’t have access to already, if we want to develop it. We only go to other countries now for slave labor and/or resource exploiting without any environmental concerns. Not only are neither of those Aryan principles, they’re ultimately horrible no matter where we cause it to happen on the globe and will come back to bite us.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
StreamAddict
1 day ago
“You will never find a useful percentage of White people in the modern world to agree with that.” Yeah because we’re still brainwashed retards, we’re trying to reverse that, obviously. If we actually had white nationalists in power it would be just standard procedure. Of course we just take what we need, within reason, not just go out of our way to create conflict, but if a bunch of africans or something are sitting on shit we need and theyre not cooperating then one way or the other theyre getting out of the way. We dont owe any more fair treatment than the nons would give us so its a reasonable take, just seems crazy now cuz we’re in this ridiculous situation.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
PansophicGothi
1 day ago
No one on Earth is ever not going to trade with Whites, that’s a strawman argument. Especially poor brown people, who will be desperate for anything we trade to them and have no use for the things we want. There is no reason for us to go around subjugating everyone else, it’s a net resource drain and also always comes back to bite us later . Wall off their brown nations and leave them there.
0 likes

FJB6666
1 day ago
Which country is taking in all these religion of peace morons????? Australia, we are the pathetic dumping ground for low IQ, allah snackbars. F labor traitors for now endangering Australians security.
0 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
read Mario Palmieri available on Amazon and free pdf online. totally great.
0 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
thanks guys. so many others are pretending to be natty because of elections and it’s really enervating. Hey yo y’all ya hear what Tim Pool and Candace Owens said yo? They get real spicy every four years for some reason. So sick of the coopting. I’d rather they be true lefties than fake nationalists.
0 likes

Baran319
7 hours ago
“A short time ago Mrs. Besant, in an interesting essay, announced that there was only one religion in the world, that all faiths were only versions or perversions of it, and that she was quite prepared to say what it was. According to Mrs. Besant this universal Church is simply the universal self. It is the doctrine that we are really all one person; that there are no real walls of individuality between man and man. If I may put it so, she does not tell us to love our neighbors; she tells us to be our neighbors. That is Mrs. Besant’s thoughtful and suggestive description of the religion in which all men must find themselves in agreement. And I never heard of any suggestion in my life with which I more violently disagree. I want to love my neighbor not because he is I, but precisely because he is not I. I want to adore the world, not as one likes a looking-glass, because it is one’s self, but as one loves a woman, because she is entirely different. If souls are separate love is possible. If souls are united love is obviously impossible. A man may be said loosely to love himself, but he can hardly fall in love with himself, or, if he does, it must be a monotonous courtship. If the world is full of real selves, they can be really unselfish selves. But upon Mrs. Besant’s principle the whole cosmos is only one enormously selfish person. It is just here that Buddhism is on the side of modern pantheism and immanence. And it is just here that Christianity is on the side of humanity and liberty and love. Love desires personality; therefore love desires division. It is the instinct of Christianity to be glad that God has broken the universe into little pieces, because they are living pieces. It is her instinct to say “little children love one another” rather than to tell one large person to love himself… (to be continued in next comment)
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
This is the intellectual abyss between Buddhism and Christianity; that for the Buddhist or Theosophist personality is the fall of man, for the Christian it is the purpose of God, the whole point of his cosmic idea. *The world-soul of the Theosophists asks man to love it only in order that man may throw himself into it. But the divine centre of Christianity actually threw man out of it in order that he might love it. The oriental deity is like a giant who should have lost his leg or hand and be always seeking to find it; but the Christian power is like some giant who in a strange generosity should cut off his right hand, so that it might of its own accord shake hands with him.* We come back to the same tireless note touching the nature of Christianity; all modern philosophies are chains which connect and fetter; Christianity is a sword which separates and sets free. No other philosophy makes God actually rejoice in the separation of the universe into living souls. But according to orthodox Christianity this separation between God and man is sacred, because this is eternal. That a man may love God it is necessary that there should be not only a God to be loved, but a man to love him. All those vague theosophical minds for whom the universe is an immense melting-pot are exactly the minds which shrink instinctively from that earthquake saying of our Gospels, which declare that the Son of God came not with peace but with a sundering sword. The saying rings entirely true even considered as what it obviously is; the statement that any man who preaches real love is bound to beget hate. It is as true of democratic fraternity as a divine love; *sham love ends in compromise and common philosophy; but real love has always ended in bloodshed.*
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
Yet there is another and yet more awful truth behind the obvious meaning of this utterance of our Lord. According to Himself the Son was a sword separating brother and brother that they should for an aeon hate each other. But the Father also was a sword, which in the black beginning separated brother and brother, so that they should love each other at last. This is the meaning of that almost insane happiness in the eyes of the mediaeval saint in the picture. This is the meaning of the sealed eyes of the superb Buddhist image. The Christian saint is happy because he has verily been cut off from the world; he is separate from things and is staring at them in astonishment. But why should the Buddhist saint be astonished at things? — since there is really only one thing, and that being impersonal can hardly be astonished at itself. There have been many pantheist poems suggesting wonder, but no really successful ones. The pantheist cannot wonder, for he cannot praise God or praise anything as really distinct from himself. Our immediate business here, however, is with the effect of this Christian admiration (which strikes outwards, towards a deity distinct from the worshipper) upon the general need for ethical activity and social reform. And surely its effect is sufficiently obvious. There is no real possibility of getting out of pantheism, any special impulse to moral action. For pantheism implies in its nature that one thing is as good as another; whereas action implies in its nature that one thing is greatly preferable to another. Swinburne in the high summer of his scepticism tried in vain to wrestle with this difficulty. In “Songs before Sunrise,” written under the inspiration of Garibaldi and the revolt of Italy he proclaimed the newer religion and the purer God which should wither up all the priests of the world: ‘What doest thou now Looking Godward to cry I am I, thou art thou, I am low, thou art high, I am thou that thou seekest to find him, find thou but th
0 likes

Baran319
7 hours ago
“When the business man rebukes the idealism of his office-boy, it is commonly in some such speech as this: “Ah, yes, when one is young, one has these ideals in the abstract and these castles in the air; but in middle age they all break up like clouds, and one comes down to a belief in practical politics, to using the machinery one has and getting on with the world as it is.” Thus, at least, venerable and philanthropic old men now in their honoured graves used to talk to me when I was a boy. But since then I have grown up and have discovered that these philanthropic old men were telling lies. What has really happened is exactly the opposite of what they said would happen. They said that I should lose my ideals and begin to believe in the methods of practical politicians. Now, I have not lost my ideals in the least; my faith in fundamentals is exactly what it always was. What I have lost is my old childlike faith in practical politics. I am still as much concerned as ever about the Battle of Armageddon; but I am not so much concerned about the General Election. As a babe I leapt up on my mother’s knee at the mere mention of it. No; the vision is always solid and reliable. The vision is always a fact. It is the reality that is often a fraud. As much as I ever did, more than I ever did, I believe in Liberalism. But there was a rosy time of innocence when I believed in Liberals. . . .
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
This is the first principle of democracy: that the essential things in men are the things they hold in common, not the things they hold separately. And the second principle is merely this: that the political instinct or desire is one of these things which they hold in common. Falling in love is more poetical than dropping into poetry. The democratic contention is that government (helping to rule the tribe) is a thing like falling in love, and not a thing like dropping into poetry. It is not something analogous to playing the church organ, painting on vellum, discovering the North Pole (that insidious habit), looping the loop, being Astronomer Royal, and so on. For these things we do not wish a man to do at all unless he does them well. It is, on the contrary, a thing analogous to writing one’s own love-letters or blowing one’s own nose. These things we want a man to do for himself, even if he does them badly. I am not here arguing the truth of any of these conceptions; I know that some moderns are asking to have their wives chosen by scientists, and they may soon be asking, for all I know, to have their noses blown by nurses. I merely say that mankind does recognize these universal human functions, and that democracy classes government among them. In short, the democratic faith is this: that the most terribly important things must be left to ordinary men themselves—the mating of the sexes, the rearing of the young, the laws of the state. This is democracy; and in this I have always believed.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
But there is one thing that I have never from my youth up been able to understand. I have never been able to understand where people got the idea that democracy was in some way opposed to tradition. It is obvious that tradition is only democracy extended through time. It is trusting to a consensus of common human voices rather than to some isolated or arbitrary record. The man who quotes some German historian against the tradition of the Catholic Church, for instance, is strictly appealing to aristocracy. He is appealing to the superiority of one expert against the awful authority of a mob. It is quite easy to see why a legend is treated, and ought to be treated, more respectfully than a book of history. The legend is generally made by the majority of people in the village, who are sane. The book is generally written by the one man in the village who is mad. Those who urge against tradition that men in the past were ignorant may go and urge it at the Carlton Club, along with the statement that voters in the slums are ignorant. It will not do for us. If we attach great importance to the opinion of ordinary men in great unanimity when we are dealing with daily matters, there is no reason why we should disregard it when we are dealing with history or fable. Tradition may be defined as an extension of the franchise. Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death. Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man’s opinion, even if he is our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man’s opinion, even if he is our father. I, at any rate, cannot separate the two ideas of democracy and tradition; it seems evident to me that they are the same idea.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Baran319
7 hours ago
The ancient Greeks voted by stones; these shall vote by tombstones. It is all quite regular and official, for most tombstones, like most ballot papers, are marked with a cross.
0 likes
vigilantejustice23
4 days ago
Blair has been annoying me lately, I’m glad he didn’t show up tbh
-2 likes

‹ Hide 6 replies
hadefo
4 days ago
make your own content then. lazy and pathetic
2 likes

GhostDogMan
Supporter+
4 days ago
Why not be specific in your criticism. “Annoying” sounds like the Left when they call conservatives “weird”. What can one do with that info?
1 like

Seanybruv
3 days ago
Annoying you because he gets your brain ticking with interesting and unique perspectives and doesn’t just say what you expect/want someone to say? Honestly, complaining about someone active in the fight for whatever reason, especially something so trivial and subjective as being annoyed, is so feminine, soy, and low T.
1 like

Whatsthefrequencyken
3 days ago
Blair is quirky and somewhat mercurial. It’s not bad to have a stream with just the two grown-ups but I hope he’s back next week.
1 like

GovMarioPalmieri
18 hours ago
well I like Blair. I doubt he’s going anywhere. He’s been with the show for a long time.
0 likes

RoseRock444
Supporter
4 days ago
Me too. But what are your reasons?
-4 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
EnglandAwake
4 days ago
You sound like a bunch of Jews to be honest.
4 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript