Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby on Free Speech Laws




Australian PM Caves in to Jewish


Lobby on Free Speech Laws



August 8, 2014 — 17 Comments


Brenton Sanderson


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 063

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott


In the face of a coordinated and sustained campaign initiated and led by Jewish activists, the Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has abandoned his 2013 election promise to water down or remove Section 18C of Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act which makes it unlawful to act in a manner likely to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” someone on the basis of race. Abbott said he had made a “leadership decision” to walk away from his pledge despite having promised to remove this outrageous restriction on the free speech after the law was used successfully against conservative columnist Andrew Bolt in 2011.


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 048

[Add. Image] Andrew Bolt


It is a measure of the power wielded by organized Jewry in Australia that the Prime Minister would rather damage his political credibility by breaking a clear election promise than suffer the consequences of defying the single most powerful group in Australian society. Abbott, who made the announcement while outlining an extension of anti-terrorism laws, attempted to justify his broken promise by claiming:

I don’t want to do anything that puts our national unity at risk at this time and so those proposals are now off the table.






[Add. images] Never joke about jews!


Abbott’s apparent desire to not further alienate Australia’s problematic Islamic community by repealing Section 18C (at a time when the government is set to strengthen laws against terrorism) is an obvious political smokescreen. The veteran Jewish journalist, Michael Gawenda, writing in the Business Spectator, identified the real reason behind the Prime Minister walking away from his election commitment:


While Abbott said that the decision to ditch the plan to rid the Racial Discrimination Act of section 18C was taken because of “complications” in dealing with Islamic communities in the context of the proposed tough new terrorism laws, it seems likely that more was involved in this decision. The conflict in Gaza and the coverage and reaction to this appalling, heartbreaking conflagration, in my opinion, made it virtually certain that any move to change or abolish section 18C would extract too high a political price.


The repeal of section 18C was vigorously opposed by the leadership of virtually every ethnic community in the country. But it would be fair to say — without wishing to give succor to those who reckon the Jews are too powerful — that Jewish community leaders have played a crucial role in organizing the opposition to any potential change to the RDA.  It is the opposition of the Jewish communal leaders that had been of major concern to [Attorney General] Brandis and, to a significant extent, Tony Abbott.


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 049

[Add. Image] Jewish journalist Michael Gawenda


Gawenda notes that the Jewish community’s overwhelming support for Section 18C (which was itself originally the legislative result of submissions by organized Jewry to the National Inquiry into Racist Violence and the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody in 1995) is linked to the broader Jewish commitment to “multiculturalism” in Australia.


The main reason that Brandis and Abbott were most concerned about the opposition of the Jewish communal leadership to any changes to section 18C is because the Jewish community is generally seen as a role model for successful multiculturalism. It is for these reasons that the Jewish communal leadership has played such an outsized role in the campaign against the watering down or elimination of section 18C. If the Jewish community is a prime example of successful multiculturalism, then its support for the retention of 18C, its highly effective campaign against any change to the RDA on the basis that any change would seriously undermine multiculturalism and free the racists to say whatever they please, represented serious political pain for Brandis and Abbott.


Gawenda is disingenuous in claiming that the source of the Jewish community’s power in this debate resides in its being a “role model for successful multiculturalism” rather than in its status as a group with the kind of financial, political and media clout to instill genuine fear in those who oppose its interests. As in the United States, Jewish money exerts a dominating influence over Australian politics, which guarantees that most politicians are willing to put the Australian Defense Forces (and Australian taxpayers) to the service of an ethno-nationalist state in which Australia has no economic or strategic interest. The Jewish academic and activist Dan Goldberg acknowledges that:

The annual report of the Australian Electoral Commission always includes Jewish names and Jewish-owned companies donating large sums to both sides of politics.[i]


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 051

[Add. Image] Jewish academic and activist Dan Goldberg


The sway held by organized Jewry over Australia’s political leaders was highlighted earlier this year when the former Foreign Minister Bob Carr hit out at the “pro-Israel lobby in Melbourne,” saying it wielded “extraordinary influence” on Australia’s foreign policy during his time in former Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s cabinet. Asked how the lobby achieved this influence he said:

I think party donations and a program of giving trips to MPs and journalists to Israel. But that’s not to condemn them. I mean, other interest groups do the same thing. But it needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level.


Carr’s observations were later corroborated by the former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser who said Carr was “absolutely correct” in his view that the Jewish lobby wielded too much power.


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 059

[Add. image] “THE last three years of Parliament have been chaotic and eventful, but Julia Gillard’s personal commitment to Israel and the Jewish community has been unequivocal” Farewell to a firm friend — The Australian Jewish News


Gawenda asserts that, unlike the vast majority of Australian Jews, he was originally in favor of the proposal to water down Section 18C of the Act until recent events gave him pause for thought: in particular the widespread criticism of Israel and its supporters for their attempts to justify the appalling massacre of Palestinian civilians in Gaza:


But here’s the thing. I believe that in recent days, in the light of what has been published about Jews and the conflict in Gaza, the clearly anti-Semitic cartoon in the Sydney Morning Herald, for instance — for which the SMH has issued an apology in an editorial that I found unsatisfactory — not to mention the astounding amount of outright racist filth to be found on social media, it may no longer be the case that we can trust editors and executive producers when it comes to ensuring that what amounts to vilification is not given any room in mainstream commentary and analysis.


So, for Gawenda, the recent (and entirely legitimate) criticism of the actions of the ethno-nationalist state of Israel and its Zionist cheerleaders in the West only serves to confirm that Jewish leaders were right to oppose any changes to Section 18C. The criticism of the Israeli government and those who would defend its barbarity in Gaza simply confirms for Gawenda that Australians cannot be trusted with unfettered free speech. Incidentally, the supposedly “anti-Semitic” cartoon in the Sydney Morning Herald to which he refers is less an anti-Semitic caricature and more an accurate representation of actual events — of Israeli citizens sitting outside to watch and cheer the bombing of the helpless Palestinian civilians as entertainment.


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 064

The “anti-Semitic” Sydney Morning Herald cartoon


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 066

An “anti-Semitic” photograph?


Likewise, for the Australian Jewish academic and activist Danny Ben-Moshe, the slaughter in Gaza;

has led to the crossing of new anti-Semitic thresholds with the potential to take us down a dangerous path. It is a path not laid with guns and bullets, but with loose and manipulative language.


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 052

[Add. image] Jewish academic and activist Danny Ben-Moshe


According to Gawenda, it was the sudden outbreak of truth-telling about Israel and the dishonesty of its apologists that reinvigorated the campaign by Australian Jewish leaders to oppose any changes to Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act:


It is this that made Jewish community leaders more determined than ever to oppose any change to section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. And in the main, Jews in Australia support the communal leadership on this issue. No one can doubt that there has been an alarming rise in anti-Semitism in Europe, something that is hardly reported in most of the Australian media. Jews feel under threat — in some cases physical threat — in France and Belgium and Germany and even in England. Not to mention Hungary, where an openly anti-Semitic party has garnered significant support. Thousands of French Jews have left France for Israel and other places. The numbers leaving every month are growing.


Though there has not been a similar rise in virulent anti-Semitism in Australia, Jews in Australia nevertheless have good reason to believe that if the virus of anti-Semitism is spreading in Europe, it might one day reach these shores. In this environment, Tony Abbott decided that the plan to change section 18C, a solemn promise he had made to Bolt and to his supporters at the Institute of Public Affairs had to be abandoned. Will there be a better political time to resurrect these proposed changes? Almost certainly not.


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 057

[Add. image] Muslims pray in the street outside Lakemba mosque in Sydney during the festival of Eid. The festival of Eid al-Fitr traditionally occurs with the first sighting of the new moon and brings to a close the end of a month of fasting from sunrise to sunset.


Note the standard pathologization of anti-Jewish sentiment as a “virus” that has nothing whatever to do with Jewish behavior. On the other hand, the reflexive Jewish hostility toward Europeans (which has led to the demographic transformation of Western nations over the last few decades) is apparently not a virus, but stems, rather, from some highly developed sense of fairness and universal brotherhood that is inherent in all Jews. Of course, what Gawenda won’t acknowledge is that the only reason Jews are increasingly subject to anti-Semitic attacks in countries like France and England is because of mass non-White (particularly Muslim) immigration and multiculturalism — both of which are the malignant outgrowths of Jewish ethnic activism.



[Add. image] Andrew Bolt after the Federal Court’s ruling, Sep 2011. “Justice (((Mordecai Bromberg))) found Bolt and the Herald & Weekly Times, publisher of the Herald Sun, breached the Racial Discrimination Act by publishing two columns that questioned a ‘trend’ of light-skinned people choosing to identify themselves as Aboriginal.


A disappointed Andrew Bolt observed that Jewish leaders would ultimately regret opposing changes to the Act, noting that:

The Jewish leaders now should look very, very deeply into their souls at what they have helped wrought and ask themselves, are you seriously safer now as a result?


Bolt’s reasoning is that under Section 18C Australian Jews will in future be precluded from criticizing the beliefs and actions of a growing and increasingly militant Australian Islamic community which will be increasingly hostile to Israel and the interests of Australian Jews.


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 055

[Add. image] Muslim women march down Macquarie Street, Sydney, in the annual Ashura Procession to promote unity and spread the message of peace and harmony.


As with Gawenda, Bolt fails to mention that the only reason there are any Muslims in Australia at all (with all their myriad problems and social dysfunctions) is because Jewish activism succeeded in ending the White Australia policy and establishing multiculturalism as the basis for social policy in Australia. As the Jewish academic Dan Goldberg proudly acknowledges:

In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia.


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 061

[Add. image] The White Australia Policy


It is clear that the Jewish fear and loathing of White Australia trumps any concern about the anti-Semitic tendencies among non-White immigrants that are being imported into the nation.



[Add. image] An advertisement from Australia House, in London, encouraging low cost emigration for Britons to Australia.


The Jewish writer Peta Jones-Pellach is not alone in expressing the view that Australian Jews should always back the Muslim minority in any conflict with White Australia, arguing that:

We recognize that our ongoing harmonious acceptance into the Australian community depends on forging bonds with the increasing numbers of non-Jewish Australians who might be our theological opponents or even our enemies.[ii]


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 053

[Add. image] Jewish writer Peta Jones-Pellach


The supposed benefits to Australian Jewry that multiculturalism has bestowed – most notably the diminished threat of the emergence of a mass movement of anti-Semitism from White Australians — is seen as having far outweighed any negative effects of large scale Islamic immigration such as the fact that:

Some Australian Jews fear that migrants arriving from Muslim countries will contribute to anti-Semitic currents in Australia, inflame extremist groups and pose a threat to the relative peace they currently enjoy.[iii]


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 056

[Add. image] The couple of hundred young Muslims that streamed into Sydney city on the weekend amid violent clashes with police riot squad members offered a visually spectacular contrast to the nominal picture postcard view of Sydney.


The rise of Islamic anti-Semitism in the West reveals a paradoxical element of the overwhelming Jewish support for multiculturalism; an element which resulted in the emergence and growth of neoconservatism. Kevin MacDonald notes that:

Although multiculturalist ideology was invented by Jewish intellectuals to rationalize the continuation of separatism and minority-group ethnocentrism in a modern Western state, several of the recent instantiations of multiculturalism may eventually produce a monster with negative consequences for Judaism.[iv]


Australian Jewish activists like Dan Goldberg recognize the danger, and he notes that:

Herein lies an underlying tension that exists in the psyche of Australian Jews in the new millennium: on the one hand understanding the fundamental wrong in tarring all Muslims with the same extremist brush; on the other hand feeling great unease in showing support for Muslims, some of whose brothers are waging jihad against Israel and the Jews. … Many Australian Jews are therefore caught between these tides, ostensibly supportive of minority rights but cognizant of the fact that among the Muslim community are radical elements who seek our destruction.[v]


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 060

[Add. image] Six charged after Sydney protests sparked by anti-Islamic film.


Sep 16, 2012 9:56AM

Despite these concerns, most Australian Jews see themselves as the longer-term beneficiaries of policies explicitly designed to dilute the power of the traditional European-derived Australian majority. Australian Jewry has therefore sought to make alliances with various immigrant groups in opposition to the White majority, including Muslims. Attempts to form a political coalition with Australian Muslims date from the earliest days of Australian multiculturalism. Australian Jews sought Muslim support for the enactment of the racial discrimination legislation recommended by the Lippmann-chaired Committee on Community Relations in the mid-1970s. In the years since, Jews have repeatedly sought the support of the Muslim community in lobbying for various multicultural policies, including those relating to;

access to government services, recourse for victims of discrimination, and protection from harassment.


Jewish activism organizations such as the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council was quick to enlist Australia’s Muslim leaders in their campaign to oppose any changed to Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.


Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby 058

[Add. image] Jeremy Jones, the Director of Community Affairs for the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council.


According to Jeremy Jones, the director of international and community affairs of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council:


the relationship between Australian Jews and Muslims has developed positively over the past decade.


Nevertheless, he believes that:

maintaining the momentum will require leadership and determination, but there are good grounds for optimism given the network of relations and shared fruitful experiences in contemporary multicultural Australia.




[Add. image] Executive Director Dr. Colin Rubenstein of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC), is an organisation headquartered in Melbourne, Australia. It is active in lobbying the Australian government on issues of concern to Australian Jews and advocating on behalf of Israel.


Clearly, Australian Jewry believes that, despite the threat to Jews represented by the strong anti-Jewish sentiment in growing sections of the Australian Islamic community, the relationship is basically manageable in the longer-term.


Having won the battle over Section 18C, it is certain that activist Jews will push for even tougher restrictions on freedom of speech in Australia, and indeed throughout the West. The attempt to confine public discourse to within parameters that do not threaten Jewish interests has been a central preoccupation of Jewish activists for many decades. American Jewish activist organizations like the ADL [Anti-Defamation League] and the SPLC [Southern Poverty Law Center] certainly do not view the American constitution as an insuperable barrier to the imposition of laws like Section 18C in the United States.







[i] Goldberg, D. (2006) ‘After 9/11: The Psyche of Australian Jews,’ In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. 151


[ii] Peta Jones Pellach, “Interfaith Dialogue and the State of Israel,” In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski (Melbourne, Black Inc., 2006), 139.


[iii] Marcus Einfeld, “We Too Have Been Strangers: Jews and the Refugee Struggle,” In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski (Melbourne: Black Inc., 2006), 311 & 314.


[iv] MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth‑Century Intellectual and Political Movements, (Westport, CT: Praeger, Revised Paperback edition, 2001), 313.


[v] Goldberg “After 9/11: The Psyche of Australian Jews,” 145 & 146







to “Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby on Free Speech Laws

NOTE: Later comments are at the top.



August 12, 2014 – 12:56 am

I do not buy into this notion that our ills are the result of how White politicians exercise power. The truth is that the real power lays in Jewish hands. People wonder why a White gentile politician will toe the Jewish line when it is against the interests of his own people…There is no great mystery here. White politicians toe the Jewish line because you don’t get to the big leagues in American politics (or apparently most other western nations) unless you have been thoroughly vetted by Jewish elites to ensure that you are a “team player”.

We can blame the white politicians, but how many of you can honestly say that if you were given the opportunity to be President, Senator, Congressman or even a cable news anchor/reporter, that you would throw away your career (or in some cases your life) and the futures of your children by openly opposing Jewish power?

A lot of us like to think that we would, and there are many who I believe would given the opportunity, but in this system those folks will never get the opportunity.

What these White politicians are doing is being politicians. Blaming them for caving to Jewish interests is like blaming a wheel for being round. They are acting rationally within the system in which they find themselves. Those who cannot act rationally within the context of this system, do not get promoted to those levels. Many of these same White politicians would adopt far different positions if they were operating within the context of a real sovereign nation state. But they are not operating within such a context. They are operating within a Zionist occupied government in which the Jews control the monetary, financial, media and political systems.

American politicians do not find success by adopting policies which represent the interests of the electorate, they do so by adopting policies which represent the interests of the Jewish elite who rule over us. Why does every politician who wants to be a serious contender for the White House campaign in a foreign state (Israel)? Why in a presidential debate do we hear candidates attempting to outdo each other in their quest to be the most devoted to Israel? The answer is clear….it is because they understand that to advance they need to first convince the Jewish elite that their loyalties lay first and foremost with Jewish power. The actual voting by American Gentiles is of no real consequence when it comes to choosing American presidents. We have some small influence over which Jewish approved agent we can elect…but we are never given the choice to elect anyone who is not already vetted and approved as kosher.

Our salvation is not to be found by seeking racially loyal candidates. In fact, our salvation cannot come from the current political system at all and to seek it there is a foolish waste of energy and resources.

It is the very system itself that must be overthrown. Not just the political system, but the monetary and financial systems. The media must be restored to American ownership with the large multi-media giants being broken up. The system of corporate governance must be overthrown…The original idea behind corporate entities is that they would exist only for a limited time, for a limited purpose and only so long as they served the public good. The founders of this nation would have been outraged at the idea that corporations should exist merely as a convenient vehicle to seek profits while shirking liability.

Most people do not really understand just how dramatic the changes are going to need to be if we are to regain control of our own nation state. Virtually the entire system has to be scrapped and redesigned. The kind of upheaval this will create is truly frightening for most people, but it is the only way. We cannot free ourselves of Jewish power and influence while retaining the very systems of control used by Jews to rule over us. I believe that while this upheaval will indeed be traumatic, the trauma will be short lived and the panic will subside when people realize that they are not being led into uncharted territory, but back to something much closer to the kind of system that our great grandfathers would have been familiar with.


Melissa L

August 10, 2014 – 10:17 am

@ Scribe

I tend to agree. We need to get the overall masses of whites on our side by appealing to their sense of right and wrong. Show them how they as a racial group are being shafted through massive 3rd world immigration etc. Show them their own white traitors who are involved — whites will take action against their own before they will others (non-whites and Jews).



August 10, 2014 – 9:40 am


The “Islamic” community has NO business in any Western country! Wade into that truth. The sand-dwelling throat-cutters are an enemy of the White race. They are poison for our people.

Re the Jewish question, while it is true that Jews have invented the various forms of excrement known as Leftism/Marxism, the truth is that this destructive ideology works perfectly in its evil designs no matter who practices it — Jew or non-Jew. The evilry unleashed throughout the West however has come directly from our own people who practice it. Our people were in control. Our people held the reins of power. Our people have unleashed it upon the masses.

Don’t ever forget that the ultimate power rests not with the tiny fraction of elites but rather with the mobilised masses. That means the White masses in the West who can be brought to bear in many ways upon the traitors in our own race where the ultimate blame resides! The Jews are a fractional minority and can be brushed aside like a housefly buzzing around your head. We must deal with the vile trash in our own race to make any progress. Abbott can and should be run out of office by the masses of Whites who vote and control his political fate. We’ll see if that happens….



August 10, 2014 – 8:31 am

Yes, Fredrick has stumbled upon the truth. We ALL know that most (not all) Jews do in fact have a nation-destroying effect. Not because they all are devout followers of the Talmud. WRONG. Most are devout atheists with a special hatred of Christianity which includes its moral teachings as well. Okay, we got that but here is where many of you seem to go off track:

As always, we have a white man in control. It is the white man at the wheel of power. He can either appease the tiny Jewish population or go against his own people who massively outnumber them and what does he do? Shafts his OWN people! HE has the far greater blame! But, let’s just blame the Jews. Thats easier because they ain’t us.


Guillaume Durocher

August 10, 2014 – 5:08 am

Looks like YouTube has shut down Jared Taylor’s video on the war on whites. Can we hope for a Streisand effect?


Tilley Travathan

August 10, 2014 – 2:23 am

Is Tony Abbott Jewish? So presidents, kings, and PMs all have their minds controlled by Jews. That it? Pathetic.


Ted Barnes

August 10, 2014 – 1:28 am

Very very disturbing.

Things are really heating up.

IMHO, this is a stupid move on the part of the tribe. They are fueling hostility now and provoking the white mob. The slaughter of innocents in Gaza has shown the world what these people look like with their fangs exposed.

My God, I couldn’t believe those tough Aussies gave up their guns, but to cave on free speech…..whew. We’re headed for a global police state and no doubt lots of blood.


Fredrick Toben

August 9, 2014 – 6:04 am

*My maxim now applies: ‘Don’t only blame the Jews, also blame those that bend to Jewish pressure’.

Journalist Mike Carlton didn’t bend and resigned from his job at The Sydney Morning Herald for responding to a blogger by calling him a “Jewish bigot”, which is now an antisemitic slur!

Of course, throughout the media noise on Section 18C no-one dared to mention the fact that this section was specifically designed by Australia’s organised Jewry to stop public discussion on matters Holocaust.

This section enabled Australia’s Jews legally to silence those who questioned the orthodox Holocaust narrative because such an airing was just too painful to bear.

In the Andrew Bolt case Justice Mordecai Bromberg added an extra sting, which Mrs Olga Scully and I never experienced – stating Bolt lied in the offending articles.

Mrs Scully and I never got to the point of having our Holocaust material evaluated for truth content – it was just deemed to be offensive, insulting, etc.

The defence in Section 18D didn’t grip either because if you wrote material that offended or insulted an individual, then automatically it can be concluded that you were not doing it “in good faith”, but were out to upset the Jews. How dare you question a Jew about the official Holocaust narrative!

It’s all good stuff now and Australia is at the watershed of rejecting English Common Law principles and embracing European civil law or the Anglo-Australian establishment will hit back and declare a legal war on such an encroachment and pull out all stops to retain Common Law primacy.

Time will tell.



August 9, 2014 – 1:27 am

Lasst week I posted something about this on amren. We all know who opposes any comment about non Whites and non Christians but engages in hate and endless disparagement of Whites and Christians.


Franklin Ryckaert

August 9, 2014 – 12:03 am

So the Jews, supposedly the most intelligent people of the world, have decided to repel the theorethical danger of a mild form of anti-Semitism of one group (Whites) by promoting another group (Muslims) whose anti-Semitism is sure and fanatical. Call that a “survival strategy”!



August 8, 2014 – 3:22 pm

It’s a shame to see free speech so restricted in Australia. Australia is definitely not a free country. And will Australian Jews be held accountable for what they say and write or be excused? In general I don’t think they’re sorry they subverted White Australia even if it means an increase of anti-Semitism from Muslim new comers. It’s just that the use of force will eventually be needed against dissent and in a large way. I believe they’re already thinking in these terms. They didn’t need much force with White dissent but they’ll need it with Muslims.



August 8, 2014 – 2:12 pm

It is at the point now that everyone is a terrorist that has an opinion. Just do nothing and let the government do what the politicians want that have been bought by interest groups to put money in their pockets. We are the sheep.


Poupon Marks

August 8, 2014 – 2:12 pm

How sickening, disheartening, and disappointing. Made all the worse because I am sure some Conservative Jews were with the PM on this one, but are cowed into silence.



August 8, 2014 – 1:30 pm

I hope the Australian Islamic community doesn’t forgive and forget what the Jews have done in the middle east and any cooperation with them in Australia be for expedience. If so, the Jews with their hubris and Greed will have painted themselves into a corner. One can only hope.



August 8, 2014 – 12:00 pm

On September 7, 2013, when Tony Abbott’s Conservative-Liberal opposition party won the Australian parliament election, the country’s powerful Jewish Lobby took the credit for Abbott’s victory over Kevin Rudd’s governing Labour Party.

Dan Goldberg provided a clue to Tony Abbott’s victory at Israeli daily Haaretz.

“The near consensus in favor of Tony Abbott to replace Kevin Rudd as the nation’s next PM comes as the Liberal Party reportedly plans to upgrade relations with Jerusalem, make visa applications easier for Israelis, ban more terror groups and stop financial support to any organization that supports the boycott Israel campaign,” said Goldberg.



August 8, 2014 – 11:52 am

Beyond despicable. We have truly scraped the bottom of the piggy trotter barrel. With these seemingly docile words, the Abbott has confined us in a cage of silence. What an unbearable pattern of sleaze and grease these jews have exhibited time and time again. A chastity belt would be more comfortable than this.





PDF Notes

* Total words = 5,251

* Total pages = 34

*Total images = 22

* All images, captions and text in [brackets] are NOT part of original article.




PDF of this post. Click to view or download (4.0 MB). >> 





Version History


Version 2: Dec 3, 2016 — Fixed typos. Improved formatting. Added cover and more pics. Updated PDF for (Ver 2) download.


Version 1: Published Aug 12, 2014
This entry was posted in Arabs, Australia, Gaza, Israel, Jews, Race, The International Jew, White Nationalism, Zionists. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby on Free Speech Laws

  1. lemmyhead says:

    Who decides what is offensive? Personally, arses sticking in the air, I find offensive. A foreign flag being flown in my land, I find offensive. Jobs allocated on the basis of race or sex and not merit, I find offensive.

  2. katana17 says:

    Hi Lemmyhead

    When an aggrieved party says they are offended then that is good enough for action to be taken against you under Section 18C. In other words it not determined by whether a “typical” Aussie would be offended, but by the sensitivities of the offended. This is obviously a ridiculous standard and just serves to silence people.

  3. shaunantijihad says:

    When Muslims eventually force a separate Muslim State to divide Australia, as they did with Pakistan recently, will the Jews go live amongst the Muslims they invited and nurtured, or will they go live amongst White’s whom they hate and wish to destroy?

    This is not a question for Jews to answer but for Whites. And it applies to all White lands.

  4. katana17 says:

    Hi shaunantijihad.

    I don’t think the game plan of the jews regarding White countries is to allow that sort of Balkanization, at least not in the long term. Their likely plan to destroy White societies (to the point that Whites cannot rise up against jewish rule) involves making Whites a minority in their own countries. The resulting chaos will justify an increasingly hard police state ruled by them.

    BTW, do you remember posting a comment on Irish Savant re asking for assistance with a blog post you were in the process of writing?

    Anyway I posted your comment over my second (dormant) blog: teamworker14


    Please have a look and perhaps we can get the ball rolling on that little project.

    The idea here is for people to collaborate on an article. Enter any improvements to your article in the comments and I will then post a new post/version.

  5. Pingback: Updates — Plain List - katana17katana17

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *