Graham Connolly: The concept is kind of like, to rehumanise the dehumanised.

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I’ve always tried to do.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: But the government is always trying to do the opposite. The government’s always trying to paint you as a monster!

Graham Connolly: Yes.

Blair Cottrell: And what’s concerning now is the threshold of political policing. As I’ve already mentioned, there’s nothing they won’t do to paint you as a monster! There’s nothing they won’t cook up.

Graham Connolly: That’s right.

Blair Cottrell: So it’s like I’ve had everything, almost everything under the sun thrown at me at this point.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: You know, but I’ve tried to keep my chin up and just take it all in my stride. The thing is, as long as you can always explain, as long as you have the ability to still communicate with your audience and explain your point of view then you’re generally okay. But that’s the problem with censorship. They shut down your ability to explain the full story.

Graham Connolly: And that kind of leads me, actually, to something I did want to ask you about, is that for a while, you seem to take a back step, or you took a step away a little bit, or maybe not a step away completely from fighting. You’re always been a fighter. From Tom’s approach, maybe, like, you might not necessarily agreed with his approach for a while and maybe took a back step or stepped away from it. Would that be a fair way of putting it, or?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It happened sort of especially as we moved into the pandemic and the Covid fiasco.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And it just seemed like there were new priorities at that time. It seemed like the whole public consciousness moved away from political ideology and was focused more on vaccine conspiracies and survival.

And so that’s kind of where I refocused myself for a while.

But then when all of that settled down and kind of people realised that it was all just smoke and mirrors, most of it, then the priority became politics once more, and it was mostly about that.

Also initially, I didn’t believe the ninja outfits. The black block.

Graham Connolly: Yes.

Blair Cottrell: I didn’t think owning the neo-Nazi label would work. I thought that people were potentially too Hoodwinked into associating Nazis with a certain bogeyman, with a certain evil, and that was so ingrained in the consciousness of people, I doubted they were able to ever accept Nazism as anything other than evil.

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And you’d never get past that first sentence, almost like you literally, it’s just cognitive dissonance kicks in straight away and you can’t break through that wall.

Blair Cottrell: Pretty much. And I spoke already about the government’s internal counterinsurgency efforts. Part of that is also to when they isolate groups like Tom’s group, groups like White Australia, National Socialist Network. When they isolate, they try to radicalise it further. So they try to push you into taking more radical position, doing more radical stuff, saying more radical things, because that, in their view, isolates you more from your resource base, which is the public.

And so I saw going down the trajectory, initially I thought taking on more radical position was giving the government what they wanted.

But what I wasn’t, or what I underestimated was the ability of Tom, of Jacob, Jack Eltis up in Sydney, their ability to still appear cool and stay popular even while being more radical. I underestimated that. I didn’t think that was really possible. But I should have, because you remember Ziz? Ziz was this Australian cultural phenomenon who was like super aesthetic. He gave birth to the bodybuilding aesthetics movement. His brother’s still alive.

But anyway, he said that if you look good enough, you can basically sell anything. You can get away with anything. And I was kind of trying to push that message for a while, too. I was trying to get the guys to be as healthy as possible, get fit, present themselves well.

Graham Connolly: Yep.

Blair Cottrell: Not only to present a more professional appearance, but to appear as something that was respectable to the public and it was a good way to sell any message is to look good. But I think by putting that out there and by Tom basically understanding that, in essence, he was able to incorporate that, and he’s almost made Nazism cool somehow. I didn’t think it was possible.

Graham Connolly: When I first started, I was still at the stage where I was calling myself National Socialist, but when somebody would call me a Nazi, I thought I was very clever. When I turned around and I’d say:

“Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! That’s just a derogatory name for a National Socialist. Like, you’re the type of person that doesn’t use derogatory language, I thought, but here you are, the media is calling me a Nazi. I’m a National Socialist. That’s just derogatory!”

And I said this to the boys, thinking I was all clever and all that. The boys, like:

“Nah! Just own it! Like literally just own it!”

[05:20]

Blair Cottrell: And I think there’s an effort to rebrand Nazism or to reclaim National Socialism as a genuinely popular counterculture to the current system. And there’s been real progress towards doing that. I initially, I was wrong. I initially didn’t think that was possible. And there is still a large part of me that isn’t sure if it’s possible in the long term.

If you look at what’s actually happened in response to the attempt to popularise National Socialism, there’s been, as I’ve explained, even a higher threshold of political policing.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Tom’s in jail now.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: The guys in his group are experiencing all sorts of legal problems. There’s charges left, right and centre. A lot of the charges are just cooked up out of nothing.

Graham Connolly: Absolutely!

Blair Cottrell: It’s vicious corruption and it’s going to probably go further.

Graham Connolly: Yep.

Blair Cottrell: But at the same time, I don’t think that’s a reason to give up because that would mean, well, every time the government cooks up a bunch of bullshit you’ve just got to give up. It doesn’t make sense.

Graham Connolly: So yeah, historically it that that sort of policing has its limits too.

Blair Cottrell: It does because they can’t. The problem, the government right now is walking a tightrope. They’re running the risk of delegitimizing their own system in order to take out a rising popular nationalist group. And there’s kind of, there’s arguably only so far they can go before it basically threatens the foundations of this so-called democracy. I’m under no illusions about living in a democracy. I don’t believe that the concept of a democracy is anything solid, anything like truly observable. It’s kind of like a catchphrase that people use to try to pretend that they’re representing freedom and air system of opinion or representative government. But what I’ve experienced since the beginning of my political activity is just nothing but discrimination, corruption, lies and just constant bullshit basically.

So I haven’t experienced any democracy.

Graham Connolly: No, you haven’t.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. No, but I don’t think there’s any limits, put it that way. The boys seem to think that the government has to work within a certain threshold of rules. They pretend they do,

Graham Connolly: They don’t.

Blair Cottrell: But I don’t think they actually do. I think they’ll just cook shit up at the end of the day.

Graham Connolly: I think that’s why you got to, in a way you got to stay the course because the longer you can stay the course like you have done, for example, the more chance there is for more eyeballs to see you and I think that boils down, down to. If you take, if you boil down National Socialism to what it really is, and that is you’re a working man, I’m a working man, right? We go out, we pay our taxes, we do this. I want my taxes to go to the benefit of my family, my extended family, my people, which is a socialism to an extent. I want to work. I want to work to help those less fortunate. I want to work to help women to stay at home and raise their children. I want to do these things. I want my taxes to go to that sort of thing. I don’t want my taxes to go to millions of Indians coming in to turn my people into a minority here, Ireland.

Blair Cottrell: No sensible person would want that.

Graham Connolly: Nope. So deep down, most people are not just White people, most people are National Socialists! Like, if you boil it down to what it actually is, most people are socialists for their own people. Like most people are nationalists. And then the most generous of those nationalists are National Socialists.

Blair Cottrell: You know, what does socialism mean to you?

Graham Connolly: Well, that’s what it means to me is basically that the strong, the healthy are willing to go. I’m willing to work and for the fruits of my labour to go towards my people, my family, my neighbour, my extended family, etc, but that’s who I want to benefit from it. Otherwise it’s slavery to me. Otherwise what I’m doing is slavery.

Blair Cottrell: But so what you’re saying is you’re happy to work for an extended community. As long as that community is yours.

Graham Connolly: As long as it’s mine. Yeah. And it starts with, I think like when you look at loyalties, how Right-wing loyalties go. So it starts with your immediate family, your extended family, your neighbour, your street, your neighbourhood, your town, your, etc, etc. It grows like that. But it starts with family and then grows out from there. I think that’s my hierarchy of loyalty. When it comes to the Left-wing, their hierarchy of loyalty is whatever the government tells them. Basically. They have no loyalty to their own family, they have no loyalty to their own tribe, their own people.

Blair Cottrell: Well, they kind of represent an international socialism. What we call Leftists. I don’t like to use the phrase Leftists, but I do because it means something to standard viewers of podcasts like this. But really all a Leftist is someone who has been effectively conditioned by the system into buying into international socialism.

So they’re thinking along the similar lines we are in essence, but to them the group is all of mankind and all the races of mankind. So what they need to do is work for the benefit of other races before their own in order to create this global equality system, which in essence is going to destroy their race!

Graham Connolly: Exactly!

Blair Cottrell: But in their mind that’s a good thing because their race, … And it’s most exemplified by statements made by Australia’s Indian born race discrimination commissioner. He believes that you can’t be racist against White people. It’s not possible because White people have social power. Therefore racism isn’t possible. Like it’s not possible to ethnically discriminate against the power class of White people. Not only is it not possible to do it, but you still should do it because when you discriminate ethnically against White people it brings them down from their position of power and creates a more even playing field for all the other races to compete. So it’s not possible, but you should also do it at the same time. It’s good! [chuckling]

[11:24]

Graham Connolly: So based on that logic, Nazis can’t be racist because Nazis have the least amount of political power in the current system. Yes, we’re White.

Blair Cottrell: That’s an interesting thought! [chuckling]

Graham Connolly: Yes, we’re White. Yes, we’re White. But as a group we have the least amount of political, …

Blair Cottrell: You can be racist because the only victims of racism is anyone who’s not White. That’s what he’s saying. It’s because you can only be a victim of racism according to far-Left theory, people like race discrimination Commissioner. You can only be a victim of ethnic discrimination or racism if you’re not White because you don’t have social power.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And this is coming from a guy who’s on almost half a million dollar salary paid by the government to sit in Parliament and say that. [chuckling] Yeah. So who has the social power?

Graham Connolly: But you could take the logical cs. I’d like to take that logic to him and say:

“So Nazis have no social power in the current climate!”

Blair Cottrell: No institutional support.

Graham Connolly: No institutional support. The least amount of support from anyone. Nobody’s going to help them out.

Blair Cottrell: Their bank accounts get shut down! So much power do they have? [chuckling]

Graham Connolly: So thank you! We can’t be racist! That’s bullshit though, because I’m racist as fuck!

Blair Cottrell: What is racism to you?

Graham Connolly: It’s just tribalism. It’s just another word like, everybody is tribal!

So I think it’s since the dawn of time, since the first villages. Would you protect your village from an approaching warring tribe?

Blair Cottrell: Well, you’d probably be kicked out of the village if you refused to. So there’d be certain incentives.

Graham Connolly: You’d be considered a coward!

Blair Cottrell: Or you need the village anyway, so you need to protect it. Because most people depend on a community network. There’s a saying that anyone who doesn’t need anyone else to survive is either a wild beast, or a God.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And none of us mortals down here are gods. So and there’s not many people that really qualify as wild beasts either. So we all depend on each other to some extent.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

Graham Connolly: Let’s say you’re an isolated tribe. Let’s say go back as far as you want to go. Like, put yourself in the mind of a caveman, and you’re in the first village. You haven’t even met any other villages, so you don’t even understand war. And then a warring tribe comes and starts to ransack your village or whatever.

Blair Cottrell: Obviously, you’re gonna fight.

Graham Connolly: Your instinct straight away is to protect your children, to protect your wife, to protect your neighbour, protect your, …

Blair Cottrell: It’s necessary in order for a village not to fight amongst., … In order for a tribe to actually maintain cohesion and not split apart, it’s necessary to have an outside enemy.

Graham Connolly: It is.

Blair Cottrell: Every civilisation, nation in history has had an enemy that has united people against that enemy.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Even our civilisation today, the global civilisation that we call this egalitarian multicultural society, it has an enemy which unites everyone against that enemy. And that enemy is White people!

Graham Connolly: Yeah, White people.

Blair Cottrell: You see? So there always needs to be a collective opponent to any civilisation structure. And right now, the creepy thing is that you and I are sitting here, we are that enemy! The society considers us an enemy.

Graham Connolly: Well, you do The Joel and Blair Show, and Joel actually tried to introduce us to a book. Carl Schmitt. What was the name of the book? I’m forgetting, but it was basically the “friend and enemy distinction”. That’s what the whole book was about. It was exactly that. It was exactly that! Every group has an enemy.

Blair Cottrell: Well, it almost needs it. That’s if you’re going to unite a series of different nations, it’s much better for them to have a common enemy than it is for them to have a common interest. Because humans are more easily motivated by their negative impulses rather than their good nature. Because humans are more bad than they are good. And the religions of the world understand that better than anyone. Because the way the religions organise people is if you don’t do this, we’re going to torture you. Or if you behave this way, you’re going to burn in hell for all eternity. So it’s fear and self interest which motivates humans. Like, let’s say you’re going to get a few different tribes together and you’re going to say:

“Oh, hey, if we all work together, then we’re going to be able to build a really nice civilisation on that next hill over there.”

People will be like:

“Yeah, okay.”

But then if you come and say:

“Let us all band together and destroy those evil bastards on the other side of that hill!”

Everyone’s there with bells on, you see!

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

[15:52]

Blair Cottrell: So it’s like, that’s just the way we’re geared. It’s human nature to be more motivated by your negative impulses.

However, when you’re aware of that, you can become more. Yeah, you can develop the self control. You can have developed the consciousness to not always give in to your negative impulses. Right. But that’s something for the individual to explore and, it’s in the realm of self mastery.

When we’re talking about collective politics, we’re kind of discussing methods where we can actually motivate large groups of people by appealing to their negative impulses, which is essentially what politics is. You’re trying to unite people against a common threat, whether real or imagined. The benefit we have is the threat that we face as a people in this country is a real one! And we don’t have to lie to people. The situation we’re in is a bad one. Our enemy is there. It’s real and it’s aggressive! It’s working against us. So all we have to do is tell the truth! That’s all I’ve ever done is tell the truth!

Graham Connolly: Exactly!

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

Graham Connolly: And then you don’t have to worry so much about being judged by the enemy either. Like the enemy who has all the power to judge you and to smear your name and to do all this sort of thing. All you have to do is use truth as your shield.

Blair Cottrell: That’s as simple as that.

Graham Connolly: You asked about racism. What is racism? Racism to me is as well, just to come back to that, is that it’s in my interest to defend you.

Because if you lose, I lose kind of thing. If you get beaten. Like, if we’re no difference between on a night out, let’s say we’re on a night out, and you get jumped by three or four guys. It’s in my interest, and like, I’m with you. It’s in my interest to defend you, or else we both get bashed. If I defend you, we might lose. We also might win.

Blair Cottrell: Right.

Graham Connolly: And to me, it’s the same thing on a tribal level.

Blair Cottrell: So what the opposite of racism would be running away to save yourself.

Graham Connolly: Yes.

Blair Cottrell: What would you call that as opposed to racism? Individualism?

Graham Connolly: Individualism, I suppose.

Blair Cottrell: Nihilism?

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Not believing in anything but yourself.

Graham Connolly: There’s a cowardly aspect to it even. Not being racist there’s the cowardly aspect to it.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s normal to be interested in self preservation.

Graham Connolly: And self preservation expands to the preservation of your tribe. It has to. Because if your tribe survives, you have a better chance of surviving. You know, you survive in numbers.

Blair Cottrell: Especially through the winter.

Graham Connolly: Especially through winter. And we’re Europeans.

Blair Cottrell: Have you seen, whose philosophy. Whose idea was it? It might have been David Duke. His idea was that the reason different races developed on the earth was mostly due to climate conditions.

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I agree with that. Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: You do agree with that?

Graham Connolly: Yeah, 100%. Yeah. So we had to figure out how to survive winters. Do you know how dark it is in Ireland in the winter?

Blair Cottrell: And cold.

Graham Connolly: You can’t grow anything.

Blair Cottrell: You got to work together to stockpile food. You got to keep the food protected.

Graham Connolly: You got to figure out how to make that food not go off.

Blair Cottrell: You got to make weapons, you got to make shelters.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Whereas if you’re in the eternal summer where you can just pick berries all year round. [chuckling]

Graham Connolly: Exactly! Just open up your teepee and fucking shoot a deer on the way past.

Blair Cottrell: It makes sense. However, I don’t believe the different races of man are purely the result of climate conditions.

Graham Connolly: Probably not. I think it’s more IQ. I think IQ is probably, has climate as a big factor, I think.

Blair Cottrell: Well, because I said earlier on in the show that I lean towards creationism, I think we all did stem not from the same organism. I Think we’ve stemmed from slightly different, either experiments or organisms.

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I agree with that as well. Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

So there’s a multitude of reasons why there’s different races on the world on the earth.

Graham Connolly: Like this out of Africa theory is complete nonsense!

Blair Cottrell: It’s already been debunked.

Graham Connolly: The out of Africa nonsense, absolute garbage!

Blair Cottrell: It was a lie from the start. It was just a lie to try to get everyone mixed race, basically. And why would, like, why do you think? Because we were talking about that before the show started, I remember. What’s this big urge to sell the mixed race person as like a desirable thing? What’s that about?

Graham Connolly: I think it’s the “ultimate goyim”.

Blair Cottrell: Why is that?

Graham Connolly: Because it’s the ultimate slave race. Because you end up having no tribal instincts. So there’s less opportunity for uprisings.

Blair Cottrell: No national loyalties.

[20:14]

Graham Connolly: No national loyalties. No racial loyalties. No tribal loyalties. Get rid of tribalism altogether. If everybody’s just the same shade of brown, then, …

Blair Cottrell: Everyone’s a number on screen.

Graham Connolly: Yeah. And I think you’re still going to have this ruling class of jews more than likely. Fake jews. And what they’re trying to do is they’re trying to create their promised goyim. Like they’re the ultimate slave, really isn’t it? Beasts in human form. That’s what I think it is. I think, the whole point is to create the goyim, like to create this biblical goyim.

Because right now White people don’t fit that they don’t fit into that. Like you can’t be sending rockets into space and shit and be considered a goyiom. [chuckling] You know what I mean? To be considered a beast in human form, we don’t fit the mould.

And so we need to be put in our place. We need to be downgraded. We need to be devolved into a goyim, like into a beast in human form. Into a slave to serve.

Blair Cottrell: It’s curious though, because in Judaic religious text it says that’s what non-jews are already.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: But it, as you said, it doesn’t really fit. That story doesn’t really add up at the moment. So there’s an urge to make that a reality.

Graham Connolly: That’s my theory. I think that’s right. I think they’re trying to fulfill that, like as if it’s a prophecy rather than what’s there at the moment.

Blair Cottrell: In Mein Kampf, Hitler writes on this subject that if there’s only one race on the earth which preserves its identity while all the others interbreed, the race which preserves itself must, with mathematical certainty, rise to become master of the Earth.

Graham Connolly: Absolutely! I agree with that. Yeah. And makes sense, doesn’t it?

Blair Cottrell: Well, Hitler was a big, I don’t want to say enthusiast. That’s not the right way to describe it, but he was big on encouraging people to read The Protocols of zion, which. Have you read those?

Graham Connolly: Parts of yeah, over the years. Usually in blog posts and stuff like this.

Blair Cottrell: And it’s of course called a forgery. They say that it’s not real. But what the Protocols are if you’re watching this and you have never heard of it, I’d be surprised if you haven’t. I mean, if you’ve arrived at the Offaly Offensive podcast, you don’t know what that is, I’d be surprised.

But for the odd viewer who doesn’t, it was said to be the written minutes of a meeting of jewish intellectuals who basically detail their methods and plans for taking over human society, or non-jewish human societies.

Graham Connolly: If it’s forgery, how is it so accurate? [chuckling]

Blair Cottrell: Well, that’s what was said by characters like, I believe, a US President, or perhaps it was even Henry Ford, but don’t quote me on that. Someone said they read it and they thought it was very informative. And he was critiqued for it by a journalist at the time saying:

“Oh, it’s a forgery. Didn’t you know it’s a forgery?”

And the way he [Henry Ford] responded was that he said:

“Well, even if it is a forgery, it seems to explain in precise detail exactly what’s happening in the world.”

Graham Connolly: Exactly what’s happening! Yeah, that’s what’s crazy! But forgery?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. You can look it up online.

Graham Connolly: Who went to the effort of forging such a thing?

[See: Guide to Kulchur – The Protocols of the Elders of Zion – Andrew Joyce – Nov 22, 2020 — Transcript]

Blair Cottrell: Well, apparently it was stolen. The way it was explained to me, it was originally in, I believe, either in Hebrew or Russian, or it was translated into Russian from Hebrew by someone, and it was stolen by a Russian prostitute who was in cohorts or in contact with the people in the meeting somehow.

And then that prostitute ended up selling it to somebody else. And it eventually made its way through Europe and was translated into different European languages.

And that’s how it came into the hands of Adolf Hitler. And it’s curious because Hitler mentions the protocols specifically in his book Mein Kampf, and he says:

“Once The Protocols become the common possession of every German. (In his own words) the jewish menace will be considered as defeated.”

So he believed if he could get everyone a copy of the Protocols, to get them to read it and understand what it meant, then they would basically reject Judaism for a thousand years in Germany. They wouldn’t accept it again. They would understand the threat that the jewish people posed to the Germans.

Graham Connolly: Because it’s not good enough to just defeat the people. Their ideas have to be defeated.

Blair Cottrell: But what I’m saying is Hitler was influenced by the Protocols, big time. He believed them. He didn’t think they were a forgery. And that’s got to be one of the primary motivators which drove Hitler to take the action that he took. Which is pretty significant when you think about it. It’s arguable, but if Hitler never came into contact with the Protocols of zion and never believed it, then would he have been the man he ended up being? Who knows?

Graham Connolly: Interesting!

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. But the point is that that document has had an extraordinary impact on many men throughout history who have ended up being notable, whether it’s in American politics or European politics.

So if you haven’t browsed that document, I recommend you do! You don’t have to believe it’s real. Go into it with an open mind. Read it for yourself and see what you think.

Graham Connolly: Yeah, read that and read the Talmud. [chuckling] You don’t have to read the Talmud! I just mean that when you take the two of them together, though, it’s like, …

Blair Cottrell: Do you know what the Talmud is? It’s a series of books, like 13 different volumes.

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Wasn’t it written by rabbis? It’s much more recent than Bibles or anything like that.

[25:22]

Blair Cottrell: Certain classes of jewish rabbis basically believe that they’re gods in human form almost, that they argue with God and win, and that they have the most extensive wisdom and big jewish brains that no goyim could ever dream of containing within their small goy skulls. And they basically just write down laws and rules for jews to follow in order to keep them a separate people and make them believe they’re the master race of the world. And that over the last couple of thousand years or so has kind of collected over the time and different rabbis have added to it. Some rabbis have challenged other rabbis and been killed for it.

So they’ve really fought to try to keep this pure version of jewish law, which isn’t really pure at all! It’s just like a collection of arguments and claims made by different respected rabbis who had the power and influence to make those claims in their respective times. And it’s put all into these volumes, which is like, there’s like 13 different volumes. And there’s a lot of stuff in there. It’s very specific stuff. But if you want it all summarized in something readable there’s a book called The Talmud Unmasked*.

I can’t remember who authored it, but I know it was translated, I think, by a Roman Catholic priest who ended up being executed by the Bolsheviks during, …

[* “The Talmud Unmasked” is an 1892 work by Justinas Pranaitus. Generally regarded as anti-Semitic, it is a collection of quotes from the Talmud and Zohar that the author claims illustrate that Judaism promotes hatred towards non-Jews to the point of promoting murder. Contents include: “Justinas Pranaitis”, “Jesus Christ in the Talmud”, “The Christians”, “Christians Must Be Avoided”, and “Christians Must Be Exterminated”. Justinas Bonaventura Pranaitis (1861 – 1917) was a Lithuanian Catholic priest who worked as Master of Theology and Professor of Hebrew at the Imperial Ecclesiastical Academy of the Roman Catholic Church in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Available as PDF download: https://archive.org/details/talimud-unmasked-by-prenaitis-the-justinas-bonaventura-pranaitis]

Graham Connolly: The jews hate when the goyim know about the Talmud.

Blair Cottrell: You’re not supposed to, … Apparently communicating the secrets of the Talmud to the non-jews is akin to the murder of all jewish people. Because if the goyim knew what the jews taught about them, the goyim, then the goyim would just kill jews openly. That’s what they say in the Talmud!

So basically what that means is they’re desperate to keep their holy religious teachings secret.

But then there’s, … Look, it depends on who you believe, because some jews will tell you that the Talmud isn’t the most holy texts to Judaism, it’s the Torah.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: There’s Talmudic Judaism and then there’s the more Orthodox Judaism, which is the Torah. But apparently that’s what they do to lie. Because apparently the Talmud is revered as the most holy text among all their different sects. However, it depends on who you believe.

Graham Connolly: It does. Yeah. Because you do have these Orthodox ones that even seem to be against Israel and stuff.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. But you get that in every community, you’re always going to get offshoots. Like, we have plenty of White people who hate White people and want them to basically cease to exist.

Graham Connolly: It’s true, isn’t it?

Blair Cottrell: And they’re in government! [chuckling] So in every race, there’s people who don’t like their own race. But I think the norm for the jews, you know, 90, 98% of jews do believe that they’re a special and separate people and they want to remain that way. They’re a fascinating race, the jews.

Graham Connolly:

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

Graham Connolly: In fairness, you kind of almost have to take your hat off to them. Just done a good job at trying to achieve what they’re trying to achieve. Like, if you laid out a goal to literally eradicate their White race, like 100 years ago, it would have sounded like an impossible task. Like a fantasy! Like how could it possibly be achieved?

Blair Cottrell: A lot of the methods, if, …

Graham Connolly: Deception!

Blair Cottrell: Well, a lot of the methods used by jewish intellectuals to deceive European or European extension nations today have been repurposed from what’s been observed by British colonials and the French Revolution and empire.

And so even though there’s always been jewish intellectuals living through, or not always, but living throughout European society, for the last couple of thousand years, they’ve been able to watch and learn a great deal from the warlike nature of the Europeans. Because we are a race that conducts war in a way that’s very effective. The Anglo specifically. We’re good at war. And the jews have been living in our societies watching us be good at war.

Graham Connolly: And so the most effective thing they’ve done, though, is make us war against each other.

Blair Cottrell: Yes. If you want to put it down entirely to jewish influence. But there’s always. How should I describe “complicit individuals”?

Graham Connolly: Yeah. Oh, yeah, absolutely!

Blair Cottrell: Who, like Churchill, for example.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Who are playing a very dirty role. And I don’t know if it’s for their own gain. I don’t know whether they’re in on it from the beginning. I do know that Churchill was critical of the jewish people early on in his political career, but ended up. I don’t know. I know that people, for reasons of tribalism, like we’ve discussed, to some degree, they can be easily pitted against each other as a result of that tribalism.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And I know that Churchill, at least at some point in his life, was an English patriot and he was worried about the expansion of the German empire. Right. He wasn’t pro-German at any point in his life.

Whereas the Prime Minister before Churchill, who was, … What was his name again?

Graham Connolly: No, I wouldn’t know. I’m, …

Blair Cottrell: He visited Germany and he was an admirer of Hitler. It was Chamberlain, I think.

Graham Connolly: He was admirer of Hitler?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he was. He visited Germany.

Graham Connolly: Well, I know that a lot of the English people at the time, like the version of history we get now that we think was always the case. Was not always the case. Apparently Hitler was pretty popular among the English people.

Blair Cottrell: He was Time magazine’s Man of the Year at one point. And this is before the war because he was considered a bit of a phenomenon before the war because he was able to turn Germany’s economic situation around.

[* Hitler as Man of the Year by TIME magazine, Jan. 2, 1939. From TIME magazine (https://time.com/5573720/hitler-world-influence/): “Hitler appeared on the cover of TIME on multiple occasions — most famously perhaps on Jan. 2, 1939, when he was named Man of the Year. That choice abided by the dictum of TIME founder Henry Luce, who decreed that the Man of the Year — now Person of the Year — was not an honor but instead should be a distinction applied to the newsmaker who most influenced world events for better or worse. In case that second criterion was lost on readers, the issue that named Hitler dispensed with the portrait treatment that cover subjects typically got. Instead he was depicted as a tiny figure with his back to the viewer, playing a massive organ with his murdered victims spinning on a St. Catherine’s wheel. Underneath the stark, black-and-white illustration was the caption, ‘From the unholy organist, a hymn of hate.’”]

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

[30:58]

Blair Cottrell: Which wasn’t an easy thing to do at the time because Germany was in peril before, when Hitler came to power. And one of the reasons Hitler came to power was because Germany was in such peril.

Graham Connolly: The Weimar Republic.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And Hitler just actually beat the communists at their own game, because it seemed like the communists were capitalizing on Germany’s situation to try to take power at the time. But by observing how the communists were conducting themselves, Hitler basically repurposed their own methods, but for the cause of National Socialism. And he beat them at revolution. He did revolution better than the communists. But he learnt it from the communists at the same time.

But I think the communists were seen almost as a foreign force in Germany, maybe. And Hitler was a soldier. He was a proud German. He was a racialist. And the Germans at the time, especially with Hindenburg, who was considered a bit of an icon by Hitler. Hitler actually really respected Hindenburg. Hindenburg was a German ethnic nationalist, a racialist. I think that racialism really appealed to the Germans at the time, and they weren’t ready to accept communism for that reason. And that’s just evidence that having a strong ethnic consciousness, an understanding that you are an exclusive race and that is important, actually protects you against international subversive movements like communism. Which is another reason they probably want to destroy race. Right?

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

Graham Connolly: What do you think? Do you think they can achieve it? Like, I mean, they’ve obviously made great inroads in the last hundred years, but what do you think about these movements like Tom’s, like ours that’s grown here in Australia, growing world-wide? How do you think it’s going to go, going forward? Do you think we’ll. Do you think we’ll see a sort of a rebirth of nationalism coming back? You know, history to say is cyclical? Do you think we’ll start to make inroads? Do you think we’ll start to take bites out of this big communist apple that we’re fucking fighting against?

Blair Cottrell: There’s two immediate obstacles that I sense.

The first one is increased lawfare, so more police harassment being targeted with even worse accusations, that kind of thing. Basically trying to stay out of jail.

But the second, I don’t think anyone’s kind of safe from that either. You don’t necessarily have to be National Socialists, just have to be effectively critical of the government and feeding nationalism somehow.

Graham Connolly: Well, there’s a guy in Brisbane who’s not one of us at all who was charged for throwing Romans at the March for Australia.

Blair Cottrell: There you go.

Graham Connolly: And he hasn’t been charged with the state laws. He’s been charged at the federal level.

Blair Cottrell: They want to put him in jail.

Graham Connolly: One year minimum.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

Graham Connolly: The judge has to put him in jail for one year minimum.

Blair Cottrell: That’s what they’re investigating me for. And they raided me on no evidence. They had no evidence! They just came up with the idea that I did it and they raided me. And I don’t know what they hoped to gain, but there’s that happening in the immediate future and that can take many ugly forms, because if they’re going to be raiding people on no evidence, that’s not much different from just inventing evidence to get you in the courts, to get you in jail, to screw with your reputation.

Then I sense that not too far away either is another crisis of some point of some sort.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: That will be imposed by the international system.

Graham Connolly: Yep.

Blair Cottrell: I think Covid will have been a warm up compared to what the next one will be.

Graham Connolly: Yeah, I think you’re probably right. Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: I think they will try another pandemic type situation, only this time it will be worse and there could actually be a virus which is worse. I do think they’re going to aim for a culling because there’s actually just too many people. There’s too many people to effectively manage at this point.

So the idea is to like just fill the Western nations with as many people as possible from around the world, create chaos, then impose this crisis. Use the crisis to significantly reduce the population and then impose a more totalitarian regime on the remaining people who survive. That seems to be the only mathematical way forward for the international system.

Graham Connolly: When you see the international system acting like they’re acting right now, do you also see an increase in the amount of people that are pushing back against it? Like as in people are starting to go, whoa, hold on now. So even people that were just completely blind to it, completely asleep to it all, completely just cognitive dissonance and all that sort of thing. Do you think that there’s a certain threshold where more and more people, even people you wouldn’t have normally expected, will start pushing back?

Blair Cottrell: Definitely!

The problem is when people are left to their own devices and to try to figure things out on their own, they go down their own rabbit holes. And in order for people to effectively revolt, they need a sort of a centralised movement to follow. Yeah, people don’t revolt on their own if there’s not an organised or pre-planned system they can follow.

Everyone just ends up in their own head and thinking they have all the answers.

[36:10]

Graham Connolly: And I’ve noticed this with a lot of people that get to the Truther movements and the anti-establishment movements and the conspiracy movements, a lot of people know instinctively that something is not right. They’re not being told the truth on most things.

But then a lot of people don’t have what I would call “discernment”. And it’s almost like a superpower in these movements to have discernment. It’s so important to be able to discern between the disinformation that’s been fed to people in order discredit you. Because it’s so easy to discredit yourself these days, if you represent any position that is wrong, like if you tell the world that Blair Cottrell is Shane Warne’s son, cuckg for example, you lose your credibility. [chuckling] Right.

Blair Cottrell: You know, well, this is one of the reasons why United Patriots Front blew up in popularity, because there was already a lot of discontent in society surrounding immigration, specifically Islamic immigration, due to certain cultural factors and incidents.

But then I came along and said:

“Well, here’s our enemy. Here’s who we are for a start. We’re Australians, we’re patriots, and these people over there, they’re our enemy. Down with them! Let’s go!”

And so then everyone gets on board because someone comes along with a simple explanation that’s very hard to disagree with, …

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: That no one can really disagree with. And everyone’s preconceived ideas of what the problem is, it all fits into the broad space that I’ve left by making such a simple explanation.

So everyone feels represented and so everyone begins to move in the same direction.

So what you want to do as a revolutionary or as someone who wants to create a populist movement or can even just contribute to it in a small way, you’ll know you’re making success when you’ve got you can spot conspiracy theorists, your truthers, your Nativists, and then your nationalists and then your National Socialists. All these different groups which only have loose connections but are all going in their own direction and arguing. When all of those groups start to move together in the same direction, following one man’s message, then you’ve got a movement!

[issue with the audio]

Graham Connolly: Yeah, we had a little sound problem there.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

Graham Connolly: But I think I was asking you if you see any similarities between the recent March for Australia on August 31 that we just had, and the UPF.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, March for Australia is much bigger. Much bigger! Much more sudden!

Graham Connolly: Because you were just talking about how bringing together all these different groups, the Nativists, the National Socialists, the truthers, conspiracy theorists, and it just made me think of that because it kind of felt like a little bit like that.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s happened organically, which is interesting. It means that people are experiencing pain, social, financial pain, and they’re associating that pain with immigration.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Now the government is trying to gaslight people into believing it’s not the source of their pain. It’s all of these mathematical economic factors that just need to be fixed by crunching some numbers.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: No, it is immigration. And everyone knows it! And so that’s what’s driving this phenomena. So there’s opportunity there for anyone who wants it.

Graham Connolly: And no one can deny that almost every person at March for Australia was White!

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

I mean, there were some people who weren’t, but it’s almost like the people at March for Australia who weren’t White, it’s like they’re kind of spiritually White or something. They have the same mindset, and they’re kind of connected to the movement, regardless.

That’s probably because, I don’t know, there were some weird people I saw in other states, you know, celebrating their multicultural. How should I put this? I’ll rephrase that. Celebrating their foreign brothers. Did you see the picture of that old guy with his arms around the black people looking up to the sky with a smile on his face?:

“I’m such a good person!”

You know, the other day I was at the gym and I noticed something. There’s always that guy at the gym who talks really loudly to the black guy, as almost like a way of signaling that he’s a good person because he’s talking to the black or his friends with the black guy.

Graham Connolly: He needs everybody to hear him. He’s talking louder than he would normally speak.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And he’s being, …

Graham Connolly: And he needs everybody around him to see him.

Blair Cottrell: That, and he’s being unnecessarily, unusually kind to the black guy, to the point where even the black guy is kind of like:

“What are you doing, bro?”

Graham Connolly: It’s really a feminine trait, I find.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And I think I’ve inspired it sometimes because I think some guys in the gym might know who I am.

And so someone feels it’s necessary to go over there and have a really loud, friendly conversation with the black guy, in spite of me or something, as though I care! [chuckling]

Graham Connolly: Do your thing there!

Blair Cottrell: But anyway, weird people at March for Australia. Some weird people. But overall, it was a cultural phenomenon which is very similar to UPF. Funnily enough, it’s happened almost exactly 10 years afterwards.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And then 10 years prior to that was the Cronulla riots, which would have happened before you arrived in Australia, when I was still a young fella.

So it’s like every 10 years there’s some sort of organic cultural response to the foreign presence in Australia.

Graham Connolly: Do you have any thoughts on how we could keep it alive this time, not let it peter out and have to wait 10 more years for another? Sort of like how to capitalise on what’s just happened.

Blair Cottrell: Register a political party! Get everyone to support the political party.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

[41:46]

Blair Cottrell: Make it cool. Make it popular.

Graham Connolly: Like you were saying a few minutes ago, where it has to get be all these different groups coming together, but they have to be behind somebody. Like, they have to be led by, …

Blair Cottrell: Something legitimate, something tangible has to result. Something permanent has to come as a result of phenomena like this.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: If you’re just going to use it like I did with UPF to try to start this Facebook page which turns into a protest group, then it can kind of just be shut down.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Like all they did was censor me from social media, take me to court on Trumped up charges, close my bank accounts and that’s it! Its done.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And for the government, that’s not that hard. And they also learnt that they can shut down future protest groups the same way.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Which they will.

Graham Connolly: Well, a lot of these March for Australia people are all just online personalities. Like they’re not, they don’t have any structure or any organisation. We are the only ones that actually have some organisation, some structure, some community like events that we put together. A political party that we’re putting together.

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, I just like some nuts. So they’re all in my teeth.

Graham Connolly: Oh, [chuckling] that’s all right. Yeah. So we do have that structure this time. Or at least we’re almost there. You know, we’ve got the numbers for the political party. Almost. I’m sure if we pushed hard for it, we could get them pretty much.

Blair Cottrell: I do think the March of Australia should be leveraged to get a political party registered.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Because then there’s something tangible and permanent and official that has resulted from the phenomena. The problem you’re going to have though is the bureaucracy of the current government is basically set up to make sure you fail.

So they’re going to come up with reasons not to register your party, …

Graham Connolly: Absolutely!

Blair Cottrell: And you’re going to have to basically take them to court and you’re going to have to spend the time, money, labour in the courts, basically suing the hell out of them for discriminating against you. And that’s the mistake I made going into politics. I didn’t have any money when I started criticising the government. And it might sound superficial, but unfortunately, you can’t do anything without money.

So when the government closed my bank accounts, censored me, took me to court for hate speech, I couldn’t defend myself. I couldn’t sue the bank for closing my accounts. I couldn’t sue the government for discrimination. I couldn’t sue the social media companies to get me back up. And I couldn’t develop any sort of method because I had no money! Right. I needed a building of lawyers to sue the fuck out of everyone who was screwing with me!

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: To push back and create a precedent to say:

“You can’t do this again!”

Instead, I was just a poor guy. I was just a carpenter from the suburbs with a phone.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And so I was easy to squash. If I could have my time again, I would get rich first. Because I’ve actually figured out recently that’s quite easy to make money in the current system, with social media and the kind of technology we have, it’s not hard to make good money if you’re really focused.

Graham Connolly: I was actually going to ask you about that the cost of being you. Like and being a truth teller.

Blair Cottrell: You know, it’s cost me everything.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: It’s cost me everything. But it’s forced me to learn how to make money through alternative. It’s forced me to be more entrepreneurial, you might say.

And so I’m using an online coaching service right now! I’m building an online coaching service, and already I’ve started making decent money through it. And I’m also providing a very valuable service to people that improves their lives as a result of it, too.

But I’m not going to plug that. I’m not here to plug that at the moment because it’s still in the works. It’s kind of operating behind the scenes. And it will be something that I’ll be plugging in the future once it’s completed and in full swing.

Graham Connolly: But your whole adult life has been you unfiltered, basically. No matter how much pressure to put on you stayed unfiltered. You stayed true. You stayed telling the truth! And you have suffered because of that.

Blair Cottrell: That’s all I know how to do, though.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And life is suffering. If you don’t suffer, you get weak.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: So you have to go through some threshold of suffering in order to stay strong and sharp.

Graham Connolly: You and Tom have known each other a long, long time. You had the UPF days, You had the Lad Soc days. What sort of thoughts went through your mind when you were watching Tom give his speech from the steps of Parliament?

Blair Cottrell: I was proud of him.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: I was impressed by how far he’s come, by how steadfast he’s remained in what he believes, no matter. No matter what! No matter what’s comes, he’s just held his head up high and he has refused to stop believing in the victory of Australian nationalism for a single moment. He hasn’t spent a single moment thinking, this isn’t going to work.

Graham Connolly: No, no.

Blair Cottrell: He is completely dedicated to the goal of victory.

[46:21]

Graham Connolly: I was in Brisbane that day, and when I seen the video start coming through of Tom with the podium. With the speakers on the steps of Parliament with that crowd there, it was a surreal moment. I was like fuck!

[See: Thomas Sewell’s Speech at the March for Australia Rally in Melbourne – Aug 31, 2025 – Transcript]

Blair Cottrell: I was worried for him, I gotta be honest. I was thinking:

“Are the people ready for Tom Sewell? Are they gonna accept this?”

And I did give him some advice, prior, because he told me he was planning on giving a speech. And I said:

“Mate, I don’t know if it’s the right decision, to be honest.”

But he told me:

“I’m doing it. I don’t care!”

And I’m just like:

“Ahhh.”

And he said:

“No, I don’t care! I’m doing it!”

And I’m like:

“All right, do what you want.”

But I’m thinking:

“Fuck!”

I was so nervous seeing him walk up there, because I was thinking:

“Are people going to scream at him? Are they going to, …”

But then everyone cheered! Everyone loved it! And I was just like:

“Whoa, whoa. He did it!”

Graham Connolly: What a moment, man!

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And it’s like I realised in that moment that I might have been wrong about everything. I might have been wrong about, as I already said, about National Socialism always being a demon to society. Maybe it won’t always be that way. And maybe things are already changing.

Graham Connolly: Maybe if the people that are representing that aren’t demons. Maybe if the people that are representing it are actually the ones fighting the demons! [chuckling]

Blair Cottrell: Correct. But that’s the thing. They’re going to take new measures to make us out as demons now.

Graham Connolly: Absolutely, they are!

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And so that’s why we have to stick together, I guess. Yeah.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Anyway, it’s been a good night.

Graham Connolly: I was just about to say that sounds like a really good spot to end it. Yeah, that was awesome!

Blair Cottrell: It was. It’s gone really quick. And it was a very conversational podcast.

Graham Connolly: It was. Yeah, look, I thought a lot about this. I was going home. Like, do I do this really structured thing? Like, I went back and forth with different ideas and how I should do it.

But really, it’s because I was talking to a few other people and we’re kind of putting ideas in my head and stuff like that. But really all I want to do with this is talk to people.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

Graham Connolly: That’s the truth! I don’t know if you’ve ever, … You know, I had the idea the Offaly Offensive 20 years ago, man!

Blair Cottrell: Really? You just sat on it?

Graham Connolly: Yeah. I just sat on it. Because this is before I was National Socialist, but I was like since 9/11 kind of thing, and after that and stuff like that, because trying to wake up your own family and it didn’t seem to be working. I was like:

“Maybe there’s a way to do good work like this and get the word out there to more people and stuff like that.”

But I just never seemed right or whatever.

And I remember recently, I don’t know if you ever heard of a guy on YouTube called The Leather Apron Club.

Blair Cottrell: No, I haven’t.

Graham Connolly: He does lots of videos, but he did one on Joe Rogan and he literally just data! He breaks down all. Every guest. Like, out of thousands of guests Joe Rogan has had on, actually, I think it’s thousands of episodes, but it works out to be about 900 guests because some of them are repeat guests. And not including MMA, not including, like action guys like mountain climbers, stuff like this, all the political guests, comedians and stuff like that, people who comment, who have basically an influence on how the world thinks 48% of them or 46% of them or something are jewish!

Blair Cottrell: Really?

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: I didn’t know.

Graham Connolly: And he goes through all the data. He goes:

“Look, I’m not going to draw any conclusions. I’m gonna leave that to you guys. I’m just going to present the data.”

It’s called The Leather Apron Club. Really, really great video. Brilliant video.

Blair Cottrell: Well, what conclusion do you draw from that?

[See: Nobody knows that HALF of Joe Rogan’s Guests have THIS in common.]

Graham Connolly: Well, he’s [Joe Rogan] not really alt-media. Like, he’s, …

Blair Cottrell: Or maybe the people who are influential in society a lot of them are jewish.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: So they’re the people who you would bring onto a podcast.

Graham Connolly: Maybe. Maybe. Yes. But yes, true, true. But there are 2% of the population, 46% of the influential guests?

Blair Cottrell: Like there’s probably a similar threshold in the ruling class.

Graham Connolly: The guy actually draws a good comparison. He goes:

“You might not think much of that. But let’s do a comparison here. The Native American population are also 2% of the population. If 48% of the political guests of the Joe Rogan podcast were Native American, you would ask the question. You’ll be like, Jesus! Like, it seems like a lot of these guys are Native Americans.”

Blair Cottrell: You got to admit, though, like, jews are more interesting to listen to than Native Americans.

Graham Connolly: Yeah, yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And that’s it. They’re just like, they’re usually more influential, more powerful, more wealthy, or they’re at least interesting to listen to because they know how to turn a phrase. They’re mercantile people, the jews. And part of being mercantile is being able to speak well.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: To sell.

[50:49]

Graham Connolly: Yeah, true, true. But I still think there’s more to it than that.

And also then he does not just Joe Rogan, he does Russell Brand. He does all these top podcasters. All of them. And every one of them is the same story across the board.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

Graham Connolly: And I remember when I seen that, and that’s a few years old now, but when I seen that, it was kind of like another inspiration to do it.

And part of the inspiration was to only have people on my podcast that Joe Rogan wouldn’t have on his.

Blair Cottrell: So the 2% of the population were Nazis. You’re going to interview all them? [chuckling]

Graham Connolly: I’m going to interview people that Joe Rogan would never interview!

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, fair.

Graham Connolly: And I don’t think Joe Rogan would interview you, for example. He might because, …

Blair Cottrell: Because I’m not like, big enough, I don’t think.

Graham Connolly: No, but even if you, … I don’t know, man, but even if you were, I don’t think he won’t interview Tom. He’s not going to interview. Like, Tom could get as big as he wants. Maybe by the time Tom is that big, it would be more acceptable to interview him. But I can’t see it happening. Like, there’s a lot of well known nationalist people that he’d never have on.

Blair Cottrell: You know, the truth is I know how to build a YouTube channel. I know how to make videos that’ll get a lot of views.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: I know how to do it.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And I could do it pretty much anytime I want to do it.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: And sometimes I do dabble in it a little bit. Sometimes I’ll make a little clip.

Graham Connolly: You’ve made some really good videos recently.

Blair Cottrell: But there’s something holding me back, and it’s the concern of where the culture’s at right now! And I feel like I’m just a sitting duck basically because I don’t have any money. So the idea is that before I build that platform and before I make the videos I want to make, I want to be able to protect myself legally.

Graham Connolly: The truth is, I think that was partly what was holding me back for ages as well. And I’ve done the same thing. I was like:

“I want to get myself financial freedom, this, that neuter and blah, blah, blah, blah.”

And I think eventually, …

Blair Cottrell: Maybe it was excuses? For me it’s not an excuse though. Like for me, I’m genuinely focused on making money right now! Like that’s what’s taken up most of my consciousness.

Graham Connolly: About 10 years ago, I got to a point where for the first time in my life, I wasn’t what I would consider a broke person. I was like:

“I had money. I wasn’t worrying about bills.”

I got to that first stage of wealth is what they call. The first stage is where your bills come in and you just pay them.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

Graham Connolly: And I ain’t there anymore! [chuckling] Since Covid things have taken a downturn.

Blair Cottrell: Wasn’t it disappointing. Like I lost pretty much everything of the small amount of stuff I owned. I just like sold most of the stuff to keep surviving.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: Because I worked for myself. I didn’t qualify for any sort of like jobkeeper that everyone else was getting. I didn’t take anything from the government during Covid I just sold stuff. Then I started a personal training business because I was thinking to myself:

“Well, everyone’s sitting at home getting fat. So everyone’s allowed out an hour a day. I’ll offer people 45 minute training sessions. We’ll go out into parks and do group sessions. I’ll make some money that way. Everyone’s being paid money by the government to sit at home and do nothing and get fat.”

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: So I’ll offer them something where I can make some of that money for myself and in return give them something to do.

Graham Connolly: Yeah.

Blair Cottrell: That’s how I started my personal training business.

Graham Connolly: Wow!

Blair Cottrell: And so that’s how I built my first clientele. But I’m glad it happened in a way because it got me away from construction. Even though my family’s pretty big into construction, it was never that interesting to me. I was always more interested in people and working with people.

Graham Connolly: It seems like a natural draw for you.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

Graham Connolly: All right, Blair, well, thanks many for coming in.

Blair Cottrell: Good on you, mate. Well, thanks for inviting me. It’s a wonderful setup you’ve got here. Really impressive that you’re getting it started and I hope it goes well for you.

Graham Connolly: Yeah, thank you very much. Thank you very much. Any idea who I should have on next time?

Blair Cottrell: I’ve had a think and I think maybe Matt Trihey. He might be a good one.

Graham Connolly: Yep, he might be great to have on.

Blair Cottrell: Matt Trihey is an influential guy in the March for Australia movement.

Graham Connolly: Yep.

Blair Cottrell: He definitely has some sway there.

Graham Connolly: He’s interesting as well.

Blair Cottrell: He is. And I’d love to see. I don’t know if you’ll do it, but I’d love to see the Damien Richardson. I’d love to see him jump on and hear his side of the story.

Graham Connolly: I love to interview Damian Richardson.

[54:51]

Blair Cottrell: He’s got that Nazi salute charge going on and I haven’t heard his side of the story. I know why he was charged and what it was for. And it was really unfair.

Graham Connolly: Really unfair.

Blair Cottrell: Bullshit!

Graham Connolly: Unbelievable, man!

Blair Cottrell: And he needs some support.

Graham Connolly: He does.

Blair Cottrell: And I think the lawyers are going to tell him:

“No, no, no, don’t talk about it!”

But it’s after the fact, so it doesn’t matter what you’re saying.

Graham Connolly: Yeah. I think he’s been keeping his head down for that reason probably too. And I feel bad for the guy, man! It’s fucking, …

Blair Cottrell: He’s a good bloke.

Graham Connolly: He’s a really good bloke, man! Yeah, just a down to earth, honest. Honest to God. True blue Aussie. A good bloke. Yeah, I’d love to have him on. I might try and contact him and see if he do it.

But look, if he wouldn’t, maybe he do it in the future. But he’s definitely one I’d love to have on.

Blair Cottrell: Once he gets going he’s the kind of guy who’s, this is my opinion. He’s the kind of bloke, he’s like:

“Oh, you know, …”

But then once he gets going there’s a fire in him! There’s a passion and he just goes crazy! He just goes off! And that’s what I love to see. I want to bring that out of him more. So yeah, we’ll see.

Graham Connolly: Awesome! Awesome!

All right, man! Thanks a million! Thanks for coming in.

Blair Cottrell: Good on you, Graham.

Graham Connolly: Cheers.

Blair Cottrell: Cheers mate!

[55:52]

[Outro video]

[56:12]

END

top

============================================

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/25/2025 = 25)

katana17
just now
[The Offaly Offensive – Blair Cottrell – Part 1 – Oct 12, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/10/19/the-offaly-offensive-blair-cottrell-part-1-oct-12-2025-transcript/ [In this video Australian pro-White activist Blair Cottrell joins Graham Conolly on his The Offaly Offensive channel for an in-depth discussion about the cost of right wing activism in Australia. Items discussed include:
1. The host introduces Blair Cottrell as “one of the most notorious and scrutinised figures in Australian activism” for a discussion about his decade in public activism.
2. The conversation begins with confusion over Blair being mistakenly identified as “Shane Warne’s son” during Covid-19 discussions about vaccine theories.
3. Graham reveals he recently had his first child, born at home without midwives: “We had her here in this very living room. Just me and Katie. No midwives even.”
4. They discuss unvaccinated children, with Blair noting: “I have noticed that the kids that don’t get vaccinated and so forth, they don’t seem to have many problems.”
5. Graham explains his background: “I grew up in Ireland. Moved here when I was like 23”, and describes his Catholic upbringing.
6. He describes sectarian divisions in Ireland as cultural rather than serious: “It was light hearted… You still snipe at each other… It’s a tribal thing.”
7. Graham discusses getting a dog during Covid and the responsibility it entailed: “When the novelty wears off a dog, that’s when you find out who you are.”
8. They explore the unnaturalness of suburban life for both humans and dogs, with Graham noting dogs on medication for anxiety in Western suburbs.
9. Blair traces his awareness of pharmaceutical manipulation back to 2008, observing depression advertising: “Are you feeling down today? It could be depression. Call this number… Trying to convince everyone they were depressed.”
And more, …

Delete
Snow_Whitee
14 hours ago
I think the Offaley offensive is a great name too by the way and love the intro to this podcast!!
1 like

Snow_Whitee
14 hours ago
I unfortunately still feel like that most people wouldn’t be able to accept Nazism as anything but evil. I think the black bloc is really effective though. In my opinion those boys look exceptional, gives a vibe of strength, discipline and organisation. Solid 💪🏻
1 like

TTFOLEY1914
3 days ago
Most interesting convo heard in years
1 like

JillKews8841
4 days ago
Fantastic content, thanks to both of you.
1 like

Gailmaree
4 days ago
It was a pleasure meeting you on Sunday and look forward to your next interview 🐈‍⬛
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
3 days ago
Lovely meeting you too. And your little puppy.
0 likes

ThomasB1986
5 days ago
Great interview. The mic volume was much better this time. Can’t wait for the next one.
1 like

TheQueensGuard
Supporter
5 days ago
30:26 why does blair pronounce it chamber “lane” 😂😂😂
1 like

Anaximander1488
Verified
5 days ago
it’s great to listen to Blair, always filled intellectual curiosity
1 like

Jenny3819
Supporter
6 days ago
Another great show guys!!! Thanks for properly entertaining me. I do appreciate it.
2 likes

StonePony88
Supporter
6 days ago
Pretty good so far. Thanks.
2 likes

Angelalee0
6 days ago
What great chat. Blair is just a wealth of knowledge, could listen all day. Blair starting the ball rolling 10 years ago and Tom has taken the ball and ran with it. I hope NSN takes off and continues to gain traction. Australia needs it. 🇦🇺
3 likes

somethingforthisbox
1 week ago
Forgery, like a painting as close to an exact copy of the original
2 likes

Dimma1313
Supporter
1 week ago
Hey my man! Fine tuning the flow as you go! Loved it. Could have listened to 3 hours of this! Great work buddy!
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
1 week ago
Thank you brother. I appreciate that very much.
1 like

mrwordsworth
1 week ago
this was the coziest chat with some of my favorite racists. thanks fellas 🙋🏼‍♂️
10 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
CountFrogDeFroggyFrog9000
1 week ago
Fake Punch? https://youtu.be/gYQXawHJLCg?si=Pg_hZUr1-vp54tmT
0 likes

MonThirteen
1 week ago
I have a huge problem with this discussion….. it just didn’t go long enough. I could have listened for hours and hours. Can’t wait to see who your next guest will be.
16 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
GigaChud7
1 week ago
I hope Rob Rundo
2 likes

SirChrisWilson
5 days ago
Exactly. I was just settling down into the “groove” of the conversation. Oh well, I have some new stuff for the reading list
1 like

Gailmaree
6 days ago
I would Matt to be interviewed.
0 likes

KINGMAGNUSMUISC
1 week ago
HEIL GRAHAM
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KINGMAGNUSMUISC
1 week ago
Punchin’ darts with Jimbo and Graham at the Pig n Whistle watching the vid of Tom’s speech at parliament was a night to remember!
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
KineticKelticKlansman
Admin
1 week ago
Wasn’t it just brother. Magic. Thanks for watching. Looking forward to catching up again soon.
0 likes

wilson75590
1 week ago
I recently watched two of your videos and really enjoyed them great job! If you’d like to grow your channel, increase views
, and attract sponsorships, I can help using my experience on Rumble; I’m a bit busy with office work now, but please share your channel link via my email (wilsonchris4632@gmail.com) or Telegram (https://t.me/Wilson1336) so I can review it and guide you on what to improve.
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript