Joel Davis: We are live. It is 6th August, 2025, and big stream for you this evening. We apologise for not being with you Sunday night. Things came up for Blair and Tom and I didn’t want to do the stream on my own. Not that I can’t do it on my own, I’ve done it on my own before. But the topic, it just wouldn’t have been as fun if it was me on my own. So I decided to save the stream. We decided to edge, we decided to hold our balls. And here we are on Wednesday and we have Mark Collett with us, our friend. I think he’s the first time he’s been on the show. We’ve gone on his show like a million times between us but nice to have Mark on the show all the way from sunny England and he’s been through some drama lately.

But first I just want to mention we have our national meet, our national conference this weekend. This is your last chance. If you want to get vetted and come White Australia.org go to White Australia.org. We just updated the website today actually it looks, it looks schmick, it looks clean. New update on the website. You can go there, you can sign up as a supporter and if you sign up as a supporter you can get an invite to get vetted and come to this weekend’s events.

On Saturday we have the White powerlifting event in the morning, in the afternoon we then have a festival that evening. We’re going to have music. Every different genre of music is going to happen. We’re going to have folk, we’re going to have RAC. We’re going to have rap music for the Zoomers, White nationalists. I know I didn’t sign off on this personally but there’s going to be White nationalist rap and there’s going to be a Sun and Rave late that evening which I’m particularly excited about. It’s going to be a jam packed evening and then on Sunday we’re going to have a conference, we’re going to do speeches. Where I get up to all kinds of shenanigans, it’s going to be huge. It’s going to be the biggest conference we’ve ever done. We’re expecting hundreds and hundreds of people. Be the biggest National Socialist conference to occur in the southern hemisphere maybe ever, at least outside of Argentina. So be there, White Australia.org.

02 Mark Banned from the EU for 15 Years and Deported from Sweden

top

But anyway, Mark, great to have you on the show. Obviously you made the news recently because you tried to go to Sweden, I believe to attend some kind of nationalist event. I don’t actually know what the event was.

And then you were not allowed basically into Sweden. You’re interned in the airport. And not only were you deported back to Britain, but you’re banned from the EU for 15 years, which is something that I haven’t really heard of before the dissidents.

There’s been many times where dissidents have been kicked out. But to be banned for 15 years is wild! And you didn’t actually do anything. You just showed up to speak at a conference. I’m sure you’ve travelled to Europe literally maybe 100 times in your life because you live in Europe. Must kind of suck being banned from the rest of the continent for 15 years. But what I’ve noticed lately, that political dissidents around the world are being treated worse and worse by Western governments. They’re blocking everyone from going to each other’s conferences. And this is probably the most egregious example of this year. So what exactly happened?

Mark Collett: Well, I’ll now only be referred to publicly as my new title, which is “The Most Dangerous Man in Europe”! A 15 year ban, de-banked from every bank and banned from every social media platform. There is literally no one in Europe who has experienced the level of political persecution that I have, where I actually, I can’t travel. And it’s not just Europe, you see, this is the Schengen Zone, which people might believe is just the freedom of movement countries that are part of the EU, but it actually extends to other European countries like Switzerland, that aren’t even in the EU.

So this is a really big deal! And legally it also extends to other countries that aren’t even in Europe. So this carries over to places like Canada and America. Once you’re placed on this list, you aren’t even free to travel to non-European countries. This will have a massive impact on my life and more so on my family’s life, because it means I can’t even take a foreign holiday with my kids. You would think this is the kind of treatment that would be reserved for someone like Carlos the Jackal or Osama Bin Laden or someone who is really in the public consciousness as sort of bad guy number one.

But that is reserved now for me, for an ethno-nationalist, because I was traveling to a peaceful, lawful social gathering, a community gathering at the Free Sweden, Summer Festival. You see, the Free Sweden, Movement is a group in Sweden that buys land and has acquired two villages which their members and supporters have moved to. They’ve taken over. They’ve clustered there. So all other ethnic groups do this, like Muslims, jews, blacks. When they come to the West, they all move to the same area of the country. They create their own centres, they buy up the local buildings, the community centres. They control the infrastructure, they build their own places of worship, and they then control those areas and run them to the benefit of their community. White people have started doing that now all over the world. They’re doing it in Sweden. And this is something that the government does not want to fund.

[05:29]

03 Detained at the Airport by a Black Policeman and a White Policewoman

top

In fact, the government fears. And I was going over to Sweden to partake in this community social gathering, and I was going to make a short speech there. I was also going to have a meal on the Friday evening.

Whenever I travel abroad, I’m always ready at passport control to say exactly where I’m staying, to say who I’m meeting. I have the details of the people who are collecting me from the airport in case they need to call them. I have the details of the hotel, and I also have the details of my flight returning home so that I can prove exactly where I’m going, who I’ll be with and when I’ll be leaving, because they’re the basic requirements.

Now, I arrived in Sweden and I entered the queue to go through passport control and I was immediately approached by two police officers, a black man and a White woman. And I’m sure this was done for effect, …

Blair Cottrell: Was that before you scanned your passport or? Is that what happened?

Mark Collett: Yeah. You’re through passport control, they can’t do anything with you are then in Sweden and different laws apply.

However, when you are in the airport before passport controls, you are treated completely differently. The same is true in Britain. So in Britain, if you’re arrested in the airport, you are subject to normal British laws.

04 No Right to Remain Silent

top

However, if you’re arrested before you have scanned your passport and come through, you are subject to completely different laws. And just briefly, the laws are so different that if you were arrested the right side of passport control on British soil, leaving the airport, you have a right to remain silent. You have a right to legal representation. You can say:

“I don’t want to say a word until my solicitor gets here.”

You have a right to contact people or make a phone call. However, if you are arrested before passport control in Britain, you have no right to legal representation. You can be held indefinitely, you have no right to contact anyone, and you have no right to maintain your silence. And such is the coercive nature of this, you are actually compelled under law to hand over all of the passwords for any device you’re carrying, and failure to do so means you are immediately guilty of a terror offence where you can be jailed for up to five years.

05 Blair Recounts His Own Recent Police Raid at His Home

top

Blair Cottrell: That sounds familiar. I had my whole house searched by Australian Federal police just a couple of weeks ago and they told me the same thing. So those laws must have been copy pasted.

Mark Collett: Yep!

Blair Cottrell: As part of Australian terror legislation. They said you’re assumed guilty of a serious offence and that you’re trying to hide it if you don’t unlock your device and you can be jailed for up to five years.

So as I said, familiar with that particular piece of legislation. But so they approached you before you scanned your passport, meaning they knew you were coming.

Mark Collett: They knew I was coming. They pulled me out. It was a black male with a shaved head and like one of those Muslim sort of beard things around the bottom of his neck and White woman who looked like she could have been a model.

And I think they sort of paired them together to see if I would overreact or I turn into the devil, take on another form when I see two police officers that are racially mixed. You know, my horns start to show and a tail, you know, comes out of my back and then my wings sprout!

And at that point they can just jail me indefinitely.

06 Mark Asked to Explain His Ex-Girlfriend with the Swastika Tattoo

top

But obviously I took this in my stride. I was honest with them. Then they took me to a room and interrogated me. They interrogated me on everything as well, I mean, absolutely everything! So like where I went to school, where I grew up my family, do I have children. They even pulled up pictures of my ex-girlfriend on like a computer monitor.

Blair Cottrell: What was the point of that? For what purpose?

Mark Collett: Well, you see, the thing is, I am quite a cheeky person and when people are sort of questioning me, I’ll always try to sort of inject a little bit of levity into the situation. So the black guy says:

“You know, can you explain this?”

And obviously he was pointing at her large swastika tattoo when he said, can you explain this?

And I said:

“Well look, I can.”

And they both sort of looked at me and said:

“What’s he gonna say?”

I said:

“Well, I was in my mid-30s, I was going through a bit of a dry patch with relationships. And then it’s extremely hot but extremely crazy girl approached me and you, …”

And I point out, I said:

“You know what it’s like when you get the hot crazy thing. You just dive straight in! And it’s an amazing ride, but it’s like a roller coaster. One minute it’s up, one minute it’s down!”

And he starts laughing.

And then the woman sort of looks over and so, like:

“You’re not going to laugh. You stop, Stop! This is meant to be serious!”

And he’s laughing and he’s like:

“Oh, you don’t need this to explain this one to me!”

And he’s like, getting with it. I said:

“But then she moves in and it gets even crazy and you can’t handle it. And, oh, my God!”

But you know what? And I was about to talk, and he was like:

“Say no more!”

And then she starts to giggle. And it sort of broke the sort of tension in the room. But they were asking everything.

[11:05]

And then eventually, when they’d asked all their questions, they sort of kicked me out of the room. I sat in this sort of holding area, which was very relaxed. They did offer me. They said:

“Would you like a coffee? Would you like water? No food, but just coffee and water.”

I said:

“No, thanks. I don’t drink coffee.”

I only drink like energy drinks. And I wasn’t really in the mood for anything and I wasn’t going to be cheeky, but, like, I’ll fetch me a Red Bull or anything like that. I was just like:

“Look, I’m gonna sit here and wait.”

07 Mark Told He’s, “A Threat to the Fundamental Fabric of Society”

top

So I sat there and then I thought, can I get out of the room? Which I figured out I could. And I had sort of a little wander because I need to go to the toilet. And then I came back, sat down, and they sort of come and grab me. Took a few hours, took me back into the room. This time there’s four officers present.

And then they read me this judgement. And the judgement is the most insane thing you’ve ever heard! They begin by telling me I’m going to be denied entry and that I’m going to be banned for 15 years from the Schengen Zone because:

“I’m a threat to public order, a threat to the fundamental fabric of society, and a threat to the values on which Sweden and the EU were built!”

And I’m like:

“Oh, my God!”

I’m sat there at this point. And then immediately I go for my phone because I want to text somebody and say:

“Look, this is getting serious!”

And they’re like:

“No, put the phone down, you’re not allowed to touch your phone.”

And then like, they all start coming towards me because there’s four of them at this point. And I’m like:

“Oh, God!”

So they go through all the stuff they asked me if I accept what they’ve said and so you can sign it to say you understand, but you don’t have to sign it. But if you don’t sign it makes no difference. I was being a little bit, sort of silly. I said:

“Well, the signature might be worth something one day, so here you go.”

And I signed it, put pushed the paperwork back over. They said:

“Have I got anything left to say?”

And I said:

“No.”

Obviously at this point I’ve not got my luggage, I’ve not got my passport, all I’ve got is what’s in my hand luggage. And they’re like:

“Look you are going to be taken out of Sweden now.”

So they start walking me, two of the women then start walking me back to the departure lounge. I said:

“Well, what’s going to happen?”

They’re like:

“Well, we’ll book you on a plane or you can you could always book yourself on one.”

And I’m like:

“Well, I can’t book myself on one because I haven’t got a passport and I can’t board anything because I haven’t got a passport and I don’t know where my luggage is.”

08 Held up in the Departure Lounge for 25 Hours Waiting for Return Flight

top

And this is where the real ordeal starts. For 25 hours I sat in the departure lounge. No word from the authorities, no word from the police, no food, no water, no bed, no access to my luggage, which contained all like my toothbrush, my toothpaste, change of clothes, etc, all I had was my hand luggage which had a little games console in it, one of my big Hoodies which was like so good that it had that Hoodie in there because that’s what kept me sort of warm, had my charging cables, it had a fast charger which I couldn’t use because my bloody travel adapters were in my luggage. And there was no way I was spending like 20 quid on a new travel adapter to use it for like one day. There’s absolutely no way I was doing that. And all I could eat was what’s in the airport. And the airport is like the most expensive place in the world to eat. I think a burger and chips with a drink would have been about 30 pounds. So I was like, no way am I doing that.

But they have these little, these hot dog machines in Sweden and there’s like six different flavours of hot dogs and they were only a couple of pounds each.

So I was just basically living off these hot dogs and cans of Coke, own cans of Red Bull. And I did that for 25 hours whilst I sleeping on these sort of seats so sleeping on these seats, it was really not particularly good. And I went to the departure terminals and I looked at when there was flights and I kind of guessed which flight it would be, to be honest, because there was only one direct flight back and they weren’t legally allowed to fly me via any other country.

So there were loads of flights back, but they all had a short layover of like 50 minutes. But I wasn’t allowed to legally touch down in another country.

Blair Cottrell: Have you been to Sweden before, Mark?

[15:16]

Mark Collett: Yeah, and this is the incredible thing. I’ve been to Europe loads of times, tons of different European countries. I’ve even done work in the European Parliament.

And on top of that, I’ve given speeches from about 2017 onwards, I’ve been consistently making speeches on European soil. I’ve never broken the law. There’s never been any criminality, any disorder. There’s never been any trouble at any of these events that I’ve spoken at. I’ve not got a criminal record. You know, I’m a family man, I’m a law abiding citizen. Everything I said was lawful, everything I was planning to say was lawful. This was just pure political persecution.

And just a few months ago I spoke in Finland at an event and Finland’s another Nordic country. There’s freedom of movement between the Nordic countries to get to Finland. You know, sometimes you, I’ve gone to Finland before and had a layover in Sweden. I’ve spoken in Sweden before.

So all the precedents were that as I was somebody with a clean criminal record, somebody who had a place to stay, contacts in Sweden, somebody who’d been there before, who travelled extensively to Europe and had never ever been involved in any disorder, criminality or immoral or unlawful activity, there was no reason to stop me, detain me, let alone deport me or ban me. But this is basically what we have to put up with but the really shocking thing was the 15 year ban! Because 15 years is an incredibly long period of time. That’s the kind of thing you’d expect for somebody who had been maybe a gun runner, or a terrorist or involved in some kind of major financial fraud across international boundaries. But this is for a 25 or 30 minute speech and they were so bothered about this 25 or 30 minute speech, they were willing to take away all my rights, treat me horrendously.

And this is all at a time where migrants are turning up on European shores without any paperwork, any background checks are being immediately taken to hotels, being given the finest food, being given, you know, clothes, being given, spending money, always have a bed to sleep in. If they’d have treated a migrant like that, there would have been a queue of human rights lawyers, you know, round the block waiting to represent them. And through the whole time I was there, I was never offered representation, I was never allowed to have somebody present with me when I was being questioned. The whole thing, you know, it was a bit of an ordeal.

09 Escorted by Police onto the Plane

top

And eventually, after 25 hours, they walk through the terminal, they get hold of me, they march me off to a gate, they have my passport and a fresh boarding pass in a bag. They board me first in front of everyone, like:

“Look, this is a dangerous guy!”

You know, everyone’s looking because it’s like:

“Why has the police got this one guy? Why is he being sat near the front of the plane?”

You know, they take you down, they’re about to watch you walk on the plane when they’ve got you in that sort of like extendable arm that goes from the airport to the plane, that’s when they give your passport back and then they watch you walk onto the plane once you’re on the plane and the passport’s being given back, etc, etc. That is when they leave and obviously then you’re flown back.

And luckily I passed through Manchester airport without any like, bother. It was the plane arrived early and I got home safe and sound. But it was weird because I left Friday morning at sort of 5:30 AM my time. That’s when I left my house and I got back Saturday night at about 11:00 PM.

So I was gone sort of maybe about 40 hours, but it really felt and technically I hadn’t been gone a day because I’d seen the wife and kids Friday morning before I left and I saw them Saturday night when I got home, but it felt a lot longer and it was quite stressful, but it was certainly an experience and I think it’s opened a lot of people’s eyes to just how biased the system is, how tyrannical the system is and how it targets nationalists.

Blair Cottrell: Oh, we’re definitely! I can sense and feel, and as a result of your story and a few other stories, what I’ve experienced recently, we’re on a new tier of oppression. Even though, as I said on Hermes stream just yesterday or the day before, there’s a lot more meme slop, Nazi memes being allowed on X and Instagram and stuff. The people who actually have potential to produce community organisations, political parties and actually affect politics in a real world way, these individuals are being targeted more than ever!

So even though there’s this illusion on a surface level of more free speech being allowed on social media, here in the real world for people like us, things are really being ramped up. You can really feel that. Can you do anything about this? Have you looked into ways.

10 System Worried About Real-Life Activism

top

Mark Collett: I want to comment on what you’ve just said. This has been something that’s been happening a lot. So I think the system knows that people are annoyed.

And I think if I’d taken the path of being Mark Collett, the content creator and all I’d ever done was produce videos and social media posts, I think I’d be back on YouTube now. I think I’d be on X. Because they want to allow a certain degree of freedom to cool things off. And the freedom they want to allow is they want to allow some talking heads on X on YouTube so that people can log on and think:

“This is all going in the right direction. We got somebody on YouTube again, like Mark, who’s going to speak our language. I can watch that. It feels good. Somebody’s regurgitating points that I would make myself. I can listen to him and I feel like somebody’s speaking for me.”

Then they log off and they do nothing else.

[21:21]

However, what they’re really scared of and what they’re clamping down on is people like myself saying:

“I want to be more than a content creator. I want to organise in the real world. I want people to get out there to protest, to demonstrate. To organise, to be involved in legal advocacy, to be involved in activism.”

That’s what they fear. We saw this with Patriotic Alternative. We saw it with the NJP. We’ve seen it with the Nordic Resistance in Sweden. We’ve seen it with White Australia, with you guys down under. We’ve seen it extensively in Canada with the anti-Covid trucker movement. They were de-platformed. They had all their money taken from them. Many of them were arrested.

But if you’re just going to talk online, they are giving people a bit of breathing space. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing! I want more people talking online, but the real tip of the spear is people who want to do some form of real world community activity. We’re the ones who are being done.

11 Mark Has 21 Days to Appeal EU Ban

top

And in terms of, can I fight this? I am putting in an appeal. I’ve got 21 days. The Free Sweden, Movement have said that they’re going to fund that. They’ve got a lawyer acting. I sent in very promptly. So yesterday I had my full statement of facts worked out, because all I can really do is give a statement of fact and my statement of fact, I can give you the kind of thing I’ve put in my statement of fact. It’s like what I travelled for, what I was going to do, whether I’ve committed crime before, where I’ve been to before, and literally the things I’ve just told you now.

So I just list all the facts and then at the end, say:

“Based on all of the factual evidence presented, this is a undemocratic and disproportionate punishment for somebody who has never committed a crime and was not intending to commit a crime.”

But whether the appeal will be successful, I don’t know. Because one thing that strikes you really hard when you’re in this situation is you’ve seen so many reports in the mainstream media of migrant rapists, migrant criminals, all being represented by human rights lawyers and being told that they won’t be deported because they’ve got human rights. And deporting them would be hard for them and their family.

But then you’re sat there and they’re in no human rights! There’s no one queuing up to help you. There’s no excuses, there’s no:

“Well, it might hurt your feeling, it might impact your family, it might affect your ability to take your children on holiday.”

There’s none of that.

But here in the UK, if you’re trying to deport a migrant rapist who’s got a kid on UK soil, it’s:

“Well you can’t deprive that child of his dad. You can’t!”

There’s been people who have said things like:

“I’m really fond of the food in the UK. And it would damage my digestive system if I had to go back to my native country and eat the slop they serve. So, oh, well, we better let him stay then. He likes the food!”

It’s any excuse, really. But for people like us, that it’s not that there are no excuses. You can’t even make legitimate arguments and no one’s willing to make a legitimate argument on your behalf.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, it seems like in the same way that certain talking heads are allowed on social media to placate the consumers, as you were suggesting, these are legal avenues which apparently exist for us to defend ourselves or make complaints. They all seem to be a road to nowhere, don’t they? It’s just like a waste of time and money. If you’re a dissident, you don’t actually have any rights. It’s very corrupt.

Mark Collett: Well, on the issue that, I want to say one last thing. When you said waste of time and money. So you also noticed that I went through this and I’ve not asked for anything. There was no donation button, there was no special support fund. There was no grifting Canadian, you know, lawyer going and making YouTube videos saying:

“You know, save Mark Collett!”

12 Tommy Robinson and His Grifting off of Supporters

top

There’s no, you know, raft of domain names that were prepared 48 hours before I flew save Mark Collett.com or get Mark back from Sweden.com. There was none of that I paid for the airport food myself. I paid for the train fares to and from the airport myself. I got back home, dealt with it, didn’t have anyone pick me up, didn’t need a defense fund. You don’t need to grift off anything.

And compare that to Tommy Robinson who recently, you know, knocked somebody out at a station and this guy had to be resuscitated and put in intensive care. He fled to Spain, was allowed to walk into Spain and because he was going to be arrested when he got back, there was a, you know, Save Tommy fund set up before he even arrived back in the UK. People donating tens of thousands of pounds.

But for somebody like me, we do it the honest way. We’re not here to sort of nickel and dime anyone over the slightest issue. It’s a bad issue, but I also wanted to set a precedent when this happened that we don’t always need to start rattling a tin and begging for cash the minute something, you know, goes slightly wrong. Because we’re a lot better than people like the Tommy Robinsons and the Avi Yemenis and all the others who were just in it to make money and to basically lead people down a dead end street.

Blair Cottrell: Well, Tommy’s got a lot of hand rubbers around him, so he might not even come up with those schemes himself. They probably you know, cook up ideas like that, how they can leverage and exploit certain circumstances he finds himself in.

[26:54]

13 Tommy and His His Coke Habit

top

Joel Davis: Well, no, Tommy loves the cocaine and like one of the best, like cocaine activities is coming up with business ideas. So he’s probably sitting there doing lines of coke with all these kikes and just scheming, you know.

Blair Cottrell: Is that like a confirmed thing that he likes the cocaine or you’re just making it?

Joel Davis: Oh yeah, man!

Mark Collett: No, no, no!

Joel Davis: The nose rubbing is out of control.

Mark Collett: Sniffing, nose rubbing, licking his lips. If you watch him as well, whenever he does a he’s always going backwards and forwards, sort of shaking, he’s very red in the face. I’ve known a lot of lads who’ve liked some of the white stuff and he seems to be in late stage as an observation. Allegedly. He looks like he’s the kind of guy who’s in late stage, sort of cocaine addiction where, …

Blair Cottrell: Well, I suppose cocaine’s its a lot more available, isn’t it, in England? Like there’s not many cocaine addicts in Australia.

Joel Davis: What are you talking about?

Blair Cottrell: It’s a lot more expensive to get. So well, not unless you really like what?

Joel Davis: There’s plenty of cocaine. I don’t know what you’re talking about, but, …

Blair Cottrell: Maybe, I don’t know, who you run with Joel Davis, but I don’t know any. [chuckling]

Joel Davis: I’ll hang out with you! Not saying anything.

Mark Collett: Yeah, well, Tommy was very, … Recently, Keith Woods. It might, not recently, maybe six months ago, maybe a year ago.

Joel Davis: Is Keith Woods on the fucking powder these days?

Mark Collett: Well, no, Keith Woods made a comment about Tommy on X. And Tommy had like a meltdown and the way he was acting to the camera, you could see his eyes were bulging, they were bright red, he was twitching his nose, he was rocking back and forward. His behaviour, he doesn’t look like he’s a guy who is all together there anymore.

And I think you know his recent behaviour as well. Sort of whacking that guy in the train station, you know, 64 year old guy, knocking him out. I don’t know, I think if I, if I’d have done something like that, all my close friends would have been like:

“Mate, what’s going wrong?”

You know, if it’s a 64 year old guy shouting something like, you just walk away, you know, hitting somebody like that it’s not some sort of, it’s not some big honourable win, is it? It’s not like you fought off, you know, 20 Muslims in the station, it’s not like you transformed into John Wick and did something really amazing! You whacked some old fellow and left him in a coma.

Blair Cottrell: Who knows, inside his own mind, who knows how glorious that moment really was? Look, you don’t know, right? I get it, and I agree. Because especially when you’ve got a reputation, a public reputation, like Tommy Robinson, you’re going to have people who approach you and want to shake your hand, and you’re going to have people who don’t like you as well. Used to happen to me down here in Australia.

But, you know, it may have just been that perfect storm of circumstances, and that was the last thing, the straw that broke the camel’s back on that particular day. You know, it might have been a fight with the wife in the morning and then screaming kids all the way to the station. And then something else. You know what I mean? Yeah.

Mark Collett: Five lines of coke! Ezra’s on the phone demanding another fundraiser. And finally somebody goes:

“Oi, Tommy! You’re racist bastard!”

In the next minute, that’s it.

Blair Cottrell: I mean, Ezra says:

“Hey, perfect. Good idea, Tommy. That’s the perfect thing we need. Let’s start the fundraisers to free Tommy from legal consequence for his, … Improvised. Good man!”

But [chuckling] anyway, hey, I’m sorry that happened to you, man! It was like, especially they didn’t give you a hotel or anything. You’re laying on those airport chairs trying to sleep under a Hoodie.

14 Mark’s Interaction with a Muslim Female Deportee at the Airport Lounge

top

Mark Collett: But the craziest thing was there was a Muslim woman as well in there, and she come from France, and for some reason they were trying to send her back to Paris. So it wasn’t like somebody said:

“Oh, well, they were deporting a Muslim as well!”

Well, deporting her back to Paris. But they weren’t sending her back to Beirut or [chuckling] something like that they were sending her to Paris, probably where she was born, London and Paris are just completely overwhelmed. But the weird thing was I was doing a stream with Red Ice and she started squawking because I was making too much noise. And then she sort of called over like a police officer, and I was like:

“Oh, man, I don’t need this as well.”

And then later on, she came over to where I was and asked for my Hoodie. She was like, because I got this big White Hoodie which is dead comfortable and it’s like an oversized one. And that was like my life saving. She’s like:

“Oh, I’m all cold!”

She didn’t speak English, but she tried broken English. She was like, rubbing her arms like:

“I’m cold. Give me your Hoodie.”

And I’m like:

“Yeah, you’re not having my Hoodie.”

Blair Cottrell: All you had to cover yourself. The only item that you really had, that Hoodie, a random Muslim being deported tried to take that from you! [chuckling]

Mark Collett: Yeah. She’s like:

“I’m gonna be cold!”

I was like:

“Yeah, but if I give it to you, then I’m gonna be cold as well. It’s like, if I had two Hoodies, you know, I’d consider it. But I only have one Hoodie and it’s for me.”

And later on, she came over and she’s like:

“Oh, my phone charger’s not working.”

15 Mark’s Kind Deed

top

Obviously you didn’t say my phone charger. But she sort of did the pointing and showing. And she was like:

“Can you fix my phone charger?”

So I was like, God! And I went and fixed her phone charger for her. It was just comical. It was I’m trapped there for being the world’s biggest racist. You know, I’ve just been designated the most dangerous man in Europe. Yet, there’s a Muslim woman trapped in there with me, and she’s literally depending on me to keep her warm and charge her phone. I genuinely think that says a lot about the European spirit and the way that immigration genuinely works or doesn’t work, [chuckling] depending on your perspective.

[32:26]

Blair Cottrell: Absolutely! Good analogy. And it really is in our nature, isn’t it, to just lend assistance when requested?

Mark Collett: Well, I’m never rude to anyone. This is the thing. I think I’m the least rude person in the world! I think I’ve only ever really sworn on stream, like, seriously, maybe, like, twice. And that was at somebody who couldn’t get a computer game working and hadn’t downloaded the maps. You know I’m generally a pretty chilled guy, except for when I’m gaming and getting angry with people. But, like I’m never rude to anyone. I’m not rude to anyone of who’s from an ethnic minority. I’m just generally quite pleasant. And if anyone wants to interview me or talk to me or whatever, I’m always sort of friendly and polite to everyone I meet. I’ve got this policy of being kind to everybody unless they do something bad to me, because I like to present the best face possible for our cause.

Yet I have been treated worse than anyone! And that’s just the crazy thing. And people actually contacted me saying, of all people that they’ve stopped going into Europe because, again, people like Tommy Robinson, who’ve got, like, extensive criminal records, are allowed to travel freely. But me, somebody who has no criminal record and is always makes pains to be so polite and reasonable to everyone is absolutely crapped upon! And then my wife’s on the phone and she’s like:

“I can’t believe this!”

She’s [chuckling] like:

“What if they don’t let you come home? What are we gonna do?”

She’s like:

“What if they detain you at Manchester for 48 hours? How are we gonna deal with this?”

And obviously, it puts a lot of stress on my family. It puts a lot of stress on the wife. Your friend Dan Pal, he rang me when I was in the airport to say hello!

Blair Cottrell: Really? Wow!

Mark Collett: Well, yeah, [chuckling] because, you see, when he rang, he was like:

“Hi, you trapped!”

I was like:

“Hi, mate, how you doing?”

16 People That Rang Mark from All over the World

top

It’s like [chuckling] the amount of people that rang me from all over the world was really heartening!

And I’ve got to say, joking aside, that was the thing that kept me going. You guys messaged me. People from America, Jared Taylor, Kevin MacDonald, people from all over Europe messaged me. Sasha Rossmuller, Marcus in Sweden, Henrik and Lana. I’m gonna forget some names here, but just everyone who rang me and messaged me. From the bottom of my heart, thank you! That’s what keeps you smiling, like you’re there. You don’t know what’s going to happen. They also give you, like, subtle threats like:

“Oh, well, we might make you pay for your own flight back.”

And you’re like:

“Oh, God!”

But, you know, everyone messaging you and sort of like keeping your spirits up and sharing, like, memes and stuff. No Chance in Scotland. He was great! You know, all these people, that’s what kept you smiling.

And I’ve always said from day one that we are creating a community, and community, like brotherhood in-group preference. That’s the important thing! And when it comes through, that’s worth more than anything. That’s worth more than a, you know, Avi Yemeni, you know, Israeli fundraiser. What matters is knowing that you’ve got White people all over the world who’ve got your back.

And that’s why they’re so scared. They’re scared because when they crapped on me, they saw thousands of people tens of thousands in my corner outraged! And that’s what they’re worried about. They’re worried about a White community with in-group preference that organises in a peaceful manner.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, absolutely! It does seem that way. And it almost seems like they’re getting desperate. I actually think they run things through AI estimating models.

And basically what the AI is telling them is:

“Unless you shut this down, unless you target the main figureheads for this community, this thing is going to become huge! This thing is going to get out of control. Everyone’s going to vote for these guys and this is going to be the next big political thing.”

17 Big Demo on Saturday This Week in a Place Called Newark

top

Mark Collett: Well, look, we’ve got a big demo on Friday. Sorry, not Friday. Big demo on Saturday this week in a place called Newark.

And when I was on social media, you know, I’d million viewed videos on YouTube, massive YouTube account. I had a massive Twitter account with 60,000 followers before Musk I was getting tweets which were viewed by millions of people. I had incredible interactions on there. They know that if I had that back, this demo this weekend, there might be 5,000 people there. But they’re absolutely, …!

And none of this is getting me down either because like I’m out this weekend demonstration. I don’t care! I’m going to be there. I’m gonna be at the forefront, I’m going to be making a speech, I’m going to be speaking my mind. I’m not going to be changing my message. This is about ensuring the future of White Britons. And that’s what it’s all always been about the number one issue of today is the future of White people! And they don’t want anyone saying that.

They don’t mind Tommy standing up. And the reason they don’t mind Tommy standing up is he’s got a really subversive message. His message is:

“That multiculturalism fundamentally works. It’s all okay and it chugs along. But the spoke in the wheel is just these Muslims. And if we get rid of the Muslims, but we keep the jews, the blacks, the Hindus, the Sikhs in the we keep the West Indians. If we celebrate the Windrush generation, if we keep the gay Pride events, that’s all going to be good and it’ll all work. But it’s just the Muslims that spoil it because they don’t like the gay pride and they’re not that fond of the Indians and they do bad things to White people. If you get rid of them. And they’re a threat to the jews, of course! Get rid of them, society will be great.”

[38:13]

18 Multiculturalism in Its Entirety is a Complete Failure!

top

Well, that’s absolute crap! Because multiculturalism in its entirety is a complete failure! And what they’re scared of is someone like me saying:

“No, multiculturalism doesn’t work. We don’t want any of them here. We don’t want the West Indians here. We don’t want the Indians here. We don’t want the Muslims here. We don’t want the jews here. We want a country for White Britons, just like everyone else has got. We want a country!”

And that’s what they’re scared of and when we were having big demos a few years ago outside migrant hotels, hundreds of people were turning up to hear me speak. And I was the only one that would get up in front of a big crowd and say:

“Look, do you want White people to be a minority in Britain?”

19 Tommy’s Poisonous Message Supports Mass Immigration Except for Muslims

top

And I’d give them the demographics on London and Birmingham and the rates at which people were coming in. And the establishment was scared. And then Tommy will come out, counter that. He’ll make threats about me. He has people threaten me online. Because his message is, it’s got nothing to do with being White. It’s about shared values. Muslims don’t embody these shared values. Well, that’s a poisonous message! Because I don’t care whether White Britons are replaced by Muslims or blacks or Indians. If White Britons are replaced, they’re replaced. And it’s the end of us! And it doesn’t matter how the end of us comes. If we’re not there, we’re not there! It’s about fighting for our survival. That’s what it’s all about.

And that’s why he is backed by the State. It’s why his YouTube account’s been reactivated. It’s why Musk is bigging up his X-account. Because his message ultimately calms the people but leads to the same eventuality, which is White erasure.

Blair Cottrell: Very well said. Well said! And thanks for joining us tonight, mate. Thanks, everybody. In the comments, comments are popping off. We’ve got a lot of live viewers. Any thoughts? Joel Davis?

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I want to switch gears now because, yeah, I think we’ve discussed that.

Blair Cottrell: And just so you know, Joel’s. Joel’s been, like, harping on the last few days about this “Goon Right” concept. He can’t stop talking about the Goon Right.

And I’m not exactly sure what he means by it. So he’s going to start explaining This, I think this is the gear he’s shifting into him. All right, because it’s like he’s sitting there. He can’t wait.

Mark Collett: Come on, mate.

20 Joel on the “Goon Right”, Aka the “Horny Right”, or Pro-Sex Right

top

Joel Davis: I’ve been edging the whole stream. I’ve been edging the whole stream. No.

Well, so basically “Gooning” is like Zoomer speak for entering into some kind of trance like state through masturbatory excess. And it’s become somewhat of a meme that corresponds to just general horniness.

And so this notion of like the “Goon Right” has come to become somewhat of a meme on the fringe. It is going to gain in momentum in the coming months and years as a label. But the Goon Right is basically the horny Right. It’s basically a pro-sex Right.

Now this is interesting because for a very long time, a very long time period, I would say from at least from the 1960s onwards, at least up to the 20s and tens, early 20s and tens, the Left-Right distinction was generally characterized by the Left being supposedly on the side of sex, supposedly on the side of degeneracy and liberation, sexual liberation. It had the youth energy, it was what the cool kids were doing. And the Right were these stuffy Christian conservatives who were saying:

“No, you shouldn’t be having any fun and you should wait until marriage and you shouldn’t do drugs and you shouldn’t listen to rock and roll. That’s satanic, that’s evil!”

And there was this kind of dichotomy and this kind of youth rebellion against that paradigm, because obviously this Christian conservative ethos was previously the dominant moral paradigm in terms of how sexuality is regulated in the West.

However, obviously that’s completely outmoded because at this point in history, no one cares about those Christian conservative values, frankly. They’ve been, they’ve become an entirely fringe subset of society. Even the people who call themselves Christians or who go to church, they don’t really embody these values in any kind of traditional way, almost to a man, and a woman. And we live in a completely different paradigm where of dating apps and you know, live stream Internet pornography and so on, where sexual morality and this and the kind of sexual paradigm is completely changed.

Where now the dominant sexual morality is not Christian conservatism, now it’s feminism. Now the moralisers are on the Left and they’re telling you basically that:

“Well, don’t be too feminine because then you’re being too submissive to the male gaze. And this is Patriarchal, this is horrible! And for women to be liberated, they have to be less sexy. They have to wear a pants suit. And men aren’t allowed to express any kind of sexual vitality, otherwise they’re creepy, otherwise they’re rapists!”

And sex scandals are now about sexual assault more so than sexual exuberance, basically. And the Left has become increasingly unsexy.

There’s nothing less sexy than transgenderism. Transgenderism is basically the annihilation of sexuality. They call it a sexual identity, but really it’s a antisexual identity. Because sexuality is built on a polarity between the masculine and the feminine. When you annihilate that, you actually annihilate that difference. You also annihilate sexual energy itself. Which is why the people on the Left don’t seem like the kind of people to be having a lot of sex, or they don’t seem to be particularly sexy.

In fact, we’ve done the studies on this. The more attractive a woman is, the more Right-wing her political belief is, on average, that’s a scientific fact.

[44:12]

Also, the higher testosterone a male is, the more Right-wing his political belief is, on average, that’s a scientific fact. This has been reproduced in literature over and over again! And so women who are liked by men and men who have high testosterone, virility, this is essentially what the Right is made up of, on average. And the Left is increasingly made up of feminine men and masculine women. And what, that’s what feminism fundamentally is. It’s an androgynous ideology. It’s an ideology that femininity is submissive to the masculine and therefore as a result of that, it’s something to be ashamed of and that women should become more masculine and men should become more feminine, so that they can be put into a submissive position.

And so now the feminist moralisers that rule our society, this “gynocracy”, if you will, they want to make men jump through hoops for pussy, basically. You have to be a good little boy! You have to not step outside of the realms of their moral structures or whatever. Otherwise you have to be alienated. This is particularly the case in public life, political life the whole Me Too movement, etc.

And so increasingly, sex is Right-wing, particularly a kind of traditional sexuality of women trying to basically attune themselves to the male gaze and to male desires, whether it be Sydney Sweeney having huge tits and having great genes, as we’ve seen recently. This is fundamentally anti-woke and Right-wing coded because she’s got blonde hair and blue eyes and it’s an obvious wink, wink, nudge, nudge to the fact that she’s got Nordic genes. Not just blue jeans on.

But also we see at the same time what is the Right associated with things like pickup artistry, looks maxing, male sexual vitality in general and male sexual assertion, sovereignty. What is like the typical, like Right-wing memes for women. Things like the Trad wife. What is the Trad wife? The Trad wife is a woman who basically subordinates herself to the ideal of femininity as desired by a man rather than trying to be a feminist girl boss to impress other women.

And so when you think about it, the Alt-Right always was like a Gooner movement because it all began according to like the meme history with Gamergate. If people remember what Gamergate was, it was a movement in 1914, sorry, 2014, 2015 online, of people who were into video games, who were getting upset at how feminists had taken over video game journalism and were criticising every game for sexualizing women too much and demanding that video game developers make women’s tits smaller and more covered up. More realistic, they would say. More realistic depictions of women that don’t make women feel inadequate and don’t reinforce, you know, Patriarchal White supremacy or whatever.

And so basically they started making video games less hot, less fun, less sexy. And the nerds rose up, the gamers rose up, and created the anti-SJW, anti-woke movement that was basically the kindling of the Alt-Right. Then of course you have Donald Trump coming to power. Who is the Gooner in Chief?

Up until Donald Trump in Right-wing politics, sex scandals would kill your career. You would basically be done for. If you were on tape saying “you can grab her by the pussy”, when you’re famous, they’ll just let you do it. That famous line. But no, Trump not only grabbed her by the pussy, but he also grabbed the presidency against the feminist in a pantsuit.

And so it was the horny Gooner, Donald Trump who basically won and defeated the Wokes. Total woke obliteration. That was the kind of that was the vibe of the times.

And so in many ways you could see this kind of transvaluation of Right-wing moralism where Donald Trump would be asked about his thoughts on Christianity and he would say he was a Christian, but when they asked him about his actual beliefs, he would expose himself as not actually being a Christian. They asked him what his favourite part of The Bible was. And he famously said, “that’s personal”. And they said:

“Well, what do you like better, New Testament or Old Testament?”

And he said he likes both the same:

“They’re both excellent!”

What did he say?:

“I always say Art of the Deal, second best book of all time behind the Bible.”

So Donald Trump kind of exposed the fact that he wasn’t really a Christian. He was just saying that he was to get votes, he thought. And it was very blatant and obvious. It was very vulgar.

Now, of course, Donald Trump is a Zionist piece of shit and he’s a shill. But this was still an archetypal transvaluation of Right-wing politics, where the kind of stuffy conservative, you know, family man who has no sexual exuberance, that was completely marginalised. And instead have a new paradigm where the Right could be sexy and the Left, as I said, it used to be in the 60s and the 70s, supposedly this fun movement of like sex, drugs and rock and roll and like, just let people live, man! And then now it has become like this moral busy bodies that are trying to destroy everyone’s fun.

[49:23]

Of course, we had the MeToo movement, various other scandals, as I mentioned. And you can see it takes shape that essentially this is the new paradigm where it’s not about Christianity vs degeneracy, it’s about masculine virility, feminine sexuality, versus this androgynous feminist cult that is basically what the Left has become. These stuffy moralisers that want to impose political correctness and all of these moral regulations upon us. And so I think the Right needs to embrace this.

You know, one thing that I’ve always noticed whenever we do press conferences, is that the journalists from the ABC, which is a Left-wing institution that isn’t commercial, that’s publicly funded, that their reporters are always ugly women! Every single woman who works for the ABC is ugly! They don’t have one hot chick there. But the Channel 7 reporters are usually pretty cute.

Now, I’m not saying Channel 7 is Right-wing, but you can see this, like whenever there’s a Left-wing coded institution, basically ugly women rise up, take key positions of power, and then assert a radical Leftist ideology upon the rest of us. Because the reason why they don’t want a traditional sexual value system where women are basically graded upon how sexually attractive they are to the male sex, how much they please men, as opposed to being viewed through some other lens. Well, if you’re an ugly woman, if you’re an unattractive woman, that sounds horrible because you’re not going to be at the top of the chain!

So you can see them basically entering into an alliance, as I said, with low that beta male orbiter types who make up the conventional Leftists. And these people aren’t sexy, they aren’t full of vitality.

So I think the Right needs to embrace this rather than having this kind of traditionalist, you know, anti-sex attitude that many elements on the Right still have. I think we have to channel this. I think we have to embrace Goonerism, we have to embrace sex. We have to embrace the fact that the hot women are on our side. We have to embrace the fact that our kind of politics is sexy, that we are liberating. We are the liberators! It is the Left that are the moralisers now and we are the liberators of sexual energy. We are the youth movement! We’re the ones that are on the side of freedom, on the side of vitality. And I see that to be something that is really coming into focus.

And it’s also becoming quite relevant because there’s been quite a few sex scandals of late, let’s say, on the Right, on the far-Right even. There’s a recent case with Aarrvol, the leader of the Return to the Land project, which got a lot of headlines. And what I noticed was that basically he was exposed for essentially making pornography 10 years ago with his now ex-wife. That all got exposed.

And I think a few years ago, if that got exposed, a White nationalist leader being kind of shamed like that, the whole movement would have turned on him. They would have frowned on him, they would have basically made his position untenable. But what I saw was the opposite. Most people either just didn’t care or they rallied behind him and said:

“You know what? Everyone makes mistakes. Who cares? It’s not that bad. It wasn’t like you were race mixing or doing anything gay or whatever. Let the nigger live, you know, let him like he’s trying to do work for our people. Let him be human!”

And we’re seeing that more and more that the Right is becoming more sex-positive in that sense. And we’re becoming more and more impervious to sexual moralism, debilitating our side. And I think that’s a great thing!

Because there’s another huge story and Australian politics recently of Mark Latham. Mark Latham, you know, has recently basically been sticking it to the jews in New South Wales politics, calling out the jewish lobby, calling out how they’re pushing all of his Hate Speech laws, calling out the caravan hoax as a Mossad op. Speaking truth to power, holding the Premier of New South Wales and his staff, holding their feet to the fire for their complicity in, basically a Mossad hoax to take away our freedom. What happens? Immediately the media start attacking him because his ex-girlfriend was some OnlyFans slut, 30 years younger than him and he’s got all these embarrassing text messages where they have a BDSM relationship.

What did Mark Latham do? Just tripled down basically. And he just, he didn’t cuck! It’s been hilarious! He tripled down not just on the jews, [chuckling] but also on his like sex-positive attitude. Calling himself “the master” and so on in press conferences has been quite funny, and his tweets have been quite funny.

That is the energy that’s emerging now on the Right, where the Right are the ones that are having fun, the Right are the ones that are sexy. You know, many women have told me that they have gooned to NSN edits or NSN rally footage. I’ve seen these comments, I’ve seen the DMs. I don’t think anyone, I don’t think there’s women out there gooning to the Liberal Party videos. I don’t think there’s women out there getting to basically anyone in politics, any of their video hype edits except ours! We have a uniquely sexy kind of politics and I think we should embrace it.

So this is basically my introductory notion of the Goon Right. I think it’s something that needs to be debated, discussed because I think it’s very important that we harness and channel sexual energy to our ends, that we make racism sexy.

And if you think about it, racism and sex on a metaphysical level are basically the same thing. Both racism and sex are fundamentally means by which you perpetuate your own existence. They are the life force expressed through the psyche, through the body.

And so it kind of makes sense that like you know, a kind of post Christian life affirming Right would come to some kind of synthesis of a race based on and pro-sex, pro-masculine, pro-feminine concept. So I could see that as basically being the new paradigm that is kind of already here. It’s already been incepted.

But I think it needs a name and we need to meme it a little bit to make it conscious, because I think there’s still quite a few people that are maybe stuck in the old paradigm who need to be challenged and who need to be argued with and maybe they have some good points to make as well.

But yeah, I don’t think we want to be the incel Right. I don’t think we want to be the Trad Right where we’re just constantly morally policing ourselves and everybody else for having sexuality. I think that’s the complete wrong trajectory for us to take as a movement.

So anyway, I’ll put that to you guys. What do you think about that concept?

Blair Cottrell: You want to go first, Mark? I’ve got a few questions I want to ask Joel.

[56:10]

Mark Collett: Yeah, I’ll go first. What you’re saying is. Sounds like Zoomer garbage.

At the end of the day, porn is a disgusting, vile poison foisted upon the Western world largely by jewish minds. They did this so that people lock themselves in the bedroom masturbating and don’t actually go out and meet real women. We need to smash all porn! It needs to be banned from the Internet. The purveyors of such need to be jailed or deported and all the filthy porn and madness OnlyFans, it needs to be shut down and genuine high level prosecutions for those who masterminded it all! It’s been nothing but destruction for young White men, has driven a wedge between men and women, prevented normal relationships from forming.

What we need to do is fundamentally get young men and young women back into traditional dating. Having sex, having White babies. That is what we need as a race. What we don’t need as a race is young White men sat consuming Internet filth, having their brains warped, getting sort of mild brain damage and then becoming gibbering, socially backward weirdos who can’t approach women. You get like that from watching too much porn, because porn has this effect on the brain which changes the way that you behave. There’s been numerous studies on this. I’ve made extensive videos on this.

And all of the things that have pushed this porn addiction, this addiction to masturbation, this addiction to increasingly depraved and degenerate acts, nearly all of them have been pushed by jews. So much so that when initial investigations into the porn industry in America took place, the people investigating the porn industry stated that it was nearly 100% jewish!

And in fact, jews who have written books and learnt essays on the porn industry boast that the porn industry was jewish. And it was motivated by an atavistic hatred of White Christian America that jews wish to dismantle because they wanted to break up healthy White society.

So I don’t really think, think that adopting sort of terminology and memes which are sort of associated with porn or glorifying porn in any manner is going to help us. And my message is clear, right? I’m a guy with a wife, two lovely White children. Don’t engage in any of this gooning or madness! Don’t go on OnlyFans! Don’t watch pornography! Go meet a woman, have babies. Do what you’re meant to do. Make sure your genetic line endures. That’s the biggest two fingers you can put up to the system.

Blair Cottrell: You immediately went to pornography, though, and I don’t remember Joel mentioning pornography specifically. What I’m understanding, Joel, is saying is that the Right, the Alt-Right, is becoming sexy and cool! It’s exciting, it’s interesting, it’s shocking to those who are attached to the system’s norms. And those people who are attached to the system’s norms, they’re the prudes now, Leftist system loyalists. They’re prudish! Feminists. They’re prudish! They’re the ones with all the rules. They’re uptight. Nothing’s allowed, that kind of stuff. Whereas the far-Right have a new rock and roll. Right?

So that was my understanding. And I’ve got a few questions to ask you, Joel, but before I do you have anything to say in response to that?

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, like, I didn’t really mention porn. I only mentioned in relation to the Arrval scandal. I don’t think we’re endorsing pornography here. But what we’re saying, though, is I don’t think we should be at the same time too morally harsh upon other people in the movement or our own people for being a little horny or going a little too far at times. You know, everyone’s human. We don’t live in a society where this kind of traditional, conservative sexual ideal is realistic or the way that people raised, or the kind of, we don’t have. Like, you don’t go outside and there’s a bunch of pristine virgins frolicking in sundresses in wheat fields that are ready to just marry you at the drop of a hat. That doesn’t exist, right? We live in a society where most people consume pornography. Most people have dating app accounts, most people have body counts. Most people do not have it all together in this domain.

[1:00:57]

And so if we try to hold up an ideal that’s completely unrealistic, and then morally police people and berate people for not embodying that ideal, I think we’re just going to come across as alienating to the vast majority of the population. Not that we should celebrate pornography or celebrate, you know, promiscuity, but at the same time, I think we could have a neutral attitude towards it where we stop trying to regulate, in particular, male sexuality. We stop trying to regulate sexuality as a political movement and instead try to channel it and use it to our ends.

You know, if there’s a girl who is going online with big titties and likes to get attention, but she’s also doing racist shit as well, if she’s also pushing our talking points or whatever, do we need to berate her for being a whore? Maybe it’s a good thing that all of the Gooners are basically having racism normalised through, like, watching her content or whatever.

So it’s like, at some point, I think we need to take a step back or, like should we be berating people for saying, Sydney Sweeney has a great rack? If a woman’s got a great rack, she’s got a great rack! I think we can just appreciate it for what it is. I don’t think we need to be the moral police here saying:

“No one is allowed to express any kind of sexuality. No one is allowed to have any kind of sexual history outside of monogamous marriage!”

And I think we could just live in reality, and I think we could embrace that reality, because, as I said now in the sexual marketplace, it isn’t this prudish, traditional morality which has any sway, has any power. It’s been basically defeated in our society.

What has power is feminism. What has power is women not wanting men to be able to have fun, not wanting women to do things to impress men, and not wanting men to be in control, to be dominant, to be assertive, to express any kind of virility. I think it’s far more pertinent that we position ourselves on the right side of this moral distinction rather than trying to morally grandstand about how horrible pornography is, I think, most people understand that pornography is bad. Like, consuming pornography all the time and jerking yourself off like crazy! The concept of gooning is a meme. Like, it’s not meant to be taken fully seriously. There’s an ironic component to it. We’re not saying, like, it’s based to, like log on to pornhub and just nut yourself crazy for hours and hours every night. But what we are saying is that maybe it’s not the worst thing if we’re on the side of sex against these, like prudish moralisers.

Mark Collett: I just want to address this. I’ve got to address this.

Firstly, we should be a movement of redemption. So if people have done crazy things and come to us and acknowledge what they’ve done’s crazy, we should accept them, allow them to put them behind them and move forward. But they shouldn’t be allowed to bring that filth into the movement.

Secondly, we should have high standards because we’re trying to be the best! We’re not just trying to be part of the goyslop madness that has destroyed our people. We’re trying to rise out of the swamp, rise out of the filth and present a better high ideal. It’s saying that because there’s high ideals, we shouldn’t have them.

Well, look at Blair. Blair’s an incredibly athletic man. Most men will never look like Blair. So does that mean we shouldn’t hold him up as an ideal of masculinity? Of course you do you hold up your best and you aim for that. But you know that a lot of people are going to fall short.

And finally, to say that we shouldn’t have shame, that we shouldn’t be shaming people, is absolute cucked nonsense! These whores who go on OnlyFans and sleep with a hundred, or a thousand different men in a day. Most of those men who are migrants, you see them queuing around the block, these people who just got off a small boat and they’re queuing up to have sex with a girl like Lily Phillips or Bonnie Blue. Those men are disgraceful scum! Those women are actually worse!

And if we had a proper society that shamed those women, they wouldn’t be doing it. But the sad thing is, when you normalise this, when you accept it, when you don’t shame it, young girls see those sluts as heroes and role models. I don’t want my daughter growing up in a world where OnlyFans whores, are seen as the role model, as the standard, as the ideal. I want my daughter growing up in a world where that kind of filth doesn’t exist and where those who would partake in it are shamed to such a degree that never show their face in society again. We’re not trying to take over the swamp! We’re trying to rise out of the swamp and create something better. And sure, many people are tainted by it and I am happy to take them by the hand, help them clean themselves off and help them towards a better future. But I don’t want them bringing any of the stinking, filthy disease swamp water with them when they come to us!

Blair Cottrell: I do think the point of life is often not to embrace your lower desires, but to try to rise above them. That’s how I’ve always tried to live personally.

But discussing this, as you called it, sexual transevaluation of Right-wing moralism. It’s an interesting topic. I think the old traditional Right-wing paradigm of sexual discipline was our paradigm for a reason. Right? And what about the traditionally Right-wing position that repression of the sex urge is a way of harnessing and focusing creative energy? Do you think that’s a thing or is that just a meme?

[1:06:32]

Joel Davis: Is that directed at me?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I’ve got a few questions for you here and what I was asking you is like I’ve seen a lot of stuff from Right-wing influencers like Soul Bra, about, as I said, harnessing or repressing the sex urge in order to increase creative energy and channel that energy into something that’s more productive. Like do you think that sort of being more sex-positive or sexually liberated perhaps that could produce the opposite effects? It could be, as I said, a way of embracing your lower desire.

Joel Davis: I mean, yes, perhaps, but there’s also a point where you become over constrictive as well, where you over constrict yourself with morality to the point that it stifles creativity and it stifles like a movement. Like if we were to go around canceling, like for example, I agree with not canceling Aarvol because he did, you know, cringe pornography films 10 years ago. It’s not about, if he was doing it now, it’d be a different story. But 10 years, it’s like, who cares? Like at the end of the day I’m sure lots of people have done cringe things out there that hasn’t been exposed. But even let’s say that they haven’t, it is kind of out of the ordinary.

Okay, so what? Like he’s obviously sincere, he’s obviously trying to do the right thing now. So like, think we could forgive people? I think we could let go of this like hyper fixated moralism.

Of course we should have some sexual morality, but that sexual morality I think makes a lot more sense for the Right if it’s derived from a masculine dominant ideal where we have prohibitions against things like cuckoldry, prohibitions against homosexuality and so on. This is a affirmation of a kind of virile, normal sexuality as opposed to being anti-sex in general. I think a, like, Christian traditionalist morality, it almost views sex as like an evil, this like, perennial curse that we’re afflicted with in the human condition or something, and that it can’t be channeled or used for almost anything and it has to be basically sectioned off.

Blair Cottrell: Lust is evil, but I’m not sure if it views sex as evil because you said. Yeah, okay, but yeah, let me ask you this question. You said “racism is sex”, right? And I know what you’re getting at there because you’re talking about procreation and perpetuating your existence into the future through procreation, which is sex. But that’s a specific type of sex, right? That’s focused sex with a purpose. That’s not just loose sex, which is going to produce bastard children. That’s not lust after the flesh. That’s not just having fun.xRock and roll. Let’s just do whatever we want.

And so I think traditionally the Church was against that latter type of sex, whereas it would probably encourage the first type of sex because it would encourage people to get married, become loyal to each other, and then have a family where the children aren’t just going to be abandoned and mistreated, usually. What do you think about that?

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think again, like, marriage is a good ideal, but in this day and age, like, what marriage used to mean was essentially proprietorship over the woman. Marriage meant that that woman was your property, basically, in a very traditional sense, like even in like, pre-Christian.

Blair Cottrell: Time, responsibility rather than property. I would say she’s your responsibility.

Joel Davis: Well, it’s both. But at this point, like, you basically get zero rights! Like, you marry a woman, you have, like, literally no rights whatsoever as a result of that marital contract. All you have is a series of obligations and open yourself up to basically being legally raped.

So it’s like, why should men just accept, okay, I need to basically put pussy on a pedestal and treat a woman with like a body count of like six. Like, as if she’s like a peasant virgin from, like the Middle Ages. Like, as if those laws and social norms still exist when they don’t. We live in a completely different social and moral paradigm. And you could say that that’s tragic. Yeah, it’s not ideal. Like maybe it was better in the past, but this is the world that we live in. We don’t live in the 13th century.

So as a result of that, I think we have to adapt morally and politically and culturally to reality. And a movement that can accept reality and can channel that reality towards positive ends is one that will win.

Now, I’m not saying obviously I support having big families and I support people being loyal to each other and raising your family together and so on, but you know, the old kind of moral ideal can’t be just reinforced through morality. Like I don’t think that you can just go up to sluts and say:

“Hey, Jesus wants you to stop being a whore, you should pray more!”

And that they’ll magically pray away all of their carnal desires.

Mark Collett: Joel, you’re a good looking guy. Blair’s a good looking guy.

And I’m not going to start talking about my sort of sexual conquests. But I can tell you this. Now if you want a woman to stop acting like a slut and if you want a woman to toe the line and behave in a manner that is acceptable, the one thing she needs is a strong man who doesn’t take her crap. Most of these women behave like this because men simp for them. The real problem is these, …

[1:12:04]

Blair Cottrell: What does that look? What does that look like in practice, Mark? A strong man who won’t take a crap! Does it look like, does it look like a hand? Is that what it looks like? [chuckling]

Mark Collett: I’ll tell [chuckling] you what it looks like. I often say this is one of my well known sayings. If you’ve and people will understand this, that had a pet dog. If you’re playing with a pet dog on the beach, the faster you chase that dog and the harder you run after it, the further the dog will run, the quicker the dog will run and the more it will go away from you. The minute you turn your back on the dog and start walking towards the car, it’s licking your heels and begging for attention. Too many men spend their time simping for women, telling them what women here trying to be the “perfect gentleman”. When actually women respond much better to strength, power, masculinity and a guy that is not hanging on their every word and bigging up their ego.

And that’s why Donald Trump said what he said about grabbing women’s genitals, because he knew that as a strong man, if he walked up to them and grabbed them, they would just melt, because he was a powerful man who wasn’t going to take their crap. Where are these simply guys who are texting, … And you see these collections online of simpy guys sending a woman a hundred messages and she hasn’t replied once. She doesn’t want that! She doesn’t want that. What she wants is a guy who goes to the gym, who isn’t addicted to porn, who’s confident, who dresses well, who looks after himself. And when she says:

“How high you’re gonna jump? !”

He says:

“I’m not jumping for you, love. If you want to please me, but you show me how you’re gonna please me, you know, I’ll be there for you if you give something nice to me, but I’m not simping for you!”

That is what, …

Joel Davis: Well, I agree with that.

Mark Collett: And that brings women into line.

Joel Davis: Well, I agree with that what I’m saying is that for the sexual polarity to be properly instantiated, the terms have to be set from the masculine, not the feminine end.

So we shouldn’t be basically subordinating ourselves to this ideal of basically you’ve got to love and respect women so much, and viewing them as sexual objects or whatever is so so immoral and horrible. This is kind of like the feminist ideal.

The masculine ideal would have to be not putting pussy on a pedestal, putting your own direction in life first and foremost, and demanding that women submit and subject themselves to your career objectives, etc.

Blair Cottrell: Women will prefer it. Well, girls will prefer. Women will prefer. If you, as a man, do what Joel was just suggesting then. They find that more attractive than a man who is falling over himself to try to please and impress them. They’ll usually choose the guy who doesn’t have time for them because he’s too busy with ambitions, personal pursuits.

And that’s the thing. You go to the gym and you look after yourself. You do well in life not to impress women. You do it because you want to. And then women will be impressed by that naturally, you don’t do anything, …

Joel Davis: Women should be the ones trying to impress us! This is kind of, I believe, in a sexual phenomenology where, like, feminism in many ways is like the illusion of the feminine subject.

This idea that there’s this thing called the “feminine subject” that has all of these desires and inclinations that need to somehow be assuaged. But I don’t think it really exists in sexuality. I think the feminine properly understood in a kind of Platonic sense sexually is the object and the masculine is the subject.

And so people say, “happy wife, happy life”. I think this is bullshit! I think it’s actually the reverse. I think insofar as a woman is making her man happy, insofar as a woman is subjecting herself to a man and trying to seek his validation, ultimately that’s where her happiness will be derived from, because that is actually feminine! Feminine is submissive. The feminine is the second sex. The masculine is primary. The masculine is the active first principle.

And so as a result, when you see like what is Sydney Sweeney’s great crime against feminism and like wokeness and so on? Her great crime is that she presents herself in a way to impress men. She makes herself the object. And you could say:

“Well you shouldn’t be gooning over some random woman. You don’t know Sydney Sweeney.”

And I agree with it. But you can nevertheless appreciate that she is a woman that appreciates, presents herself in a feminine way. It’s a feminine object ideal as opposed to the kind of sexual morality that is generally preached by the establishment at this point, which is that the man has to check all these different boxes to keep a woman happy.

And so that’s kind of what I’m getting at with this like, Goon Right idea, like in exploring it is that that’s basically what this is about reversing the polarity, the kind of the feminine is expected to subject herself to the male gaze and is celebrated for doing. So and that is in contradistinction with the feminist pantsuit ideal, the girl boss ideal, which is basically the archetype of the HR bureaucrat or the modern contemporary politician.

[1:17:42]

Mark Collett: I’ve got one rebuttal to that. I’ve got a rebuttal to that. And my rebuttal is this. And it’ll be very quick so Blair can speak. We should also do more debates like this, Joel. People seem to like this kind of content. This is definitely going to get clipped out.

But look, feminists aren’t prudes. Feminists promote two or three archetypes of a woman. They do promote the girl boss. They do promote the fat, disgusting, stinking pig beast with loads of tattoos, pink hair and those disgusting ear stretchers. But they also promote slutty OnlyFans, debauched madness!

The one thing that the feminist doesn’t promote, there is a sector that the feminist doesn’t promote, and that’s traditional European beauty.

So the reason they were annoyed about Sydney Sweeney in the denim outfit is because she didn’t look like a fat, ugly cow beast. She didn’t look like a girl boss. And she wasn’t dressed in a scandalous manner. She didn’t look like a cheap prostitute. She actually looked quite traditionally beautiful. Like, if you look at European women from the Middle Ages, they used to wear big dresses, but they used to have their breasts pushed up with corsets. They used to have a curvy hourglass figure. They would show themselves off.

If you look at Greco-Roman architecture, the female figure was always shown off, but it was done so in a beautiful way. It wasn’t a ham beast. It wasn’t a debauched whore covered in tattoos and piercings and pink hair. And it wasn’t a bossy, cowy, snotty nosed bint that you wouldn’t want to spend five minutes with. There is one sector that feminists take, one section of sort of female society that feminists take, and that is traditional beauty.

And when I saw the Sydney Sweeney advert, I thought:

“Gosh, that looks like a beautiful woman from the 70s or 80s!”

And they hate that because she didn’t look like a slag. If you saw her walking down the street like that, you’d be like:

“Oh, she’s beautiful, she looks nice!”

You wouldn’t be:

“She’s a slapper, she’s mental, she’s a ham beast!”

You know, to a feminist, you can be anything, but the one thing you can’t be is traditionally beautiful.

And I think that’s where you’re missing the point.

And for me, if you said, should the Right-wing be sexy in that way, Damn, yeah, we should! If we’ve got a beautiful woman and she’s dressing like that, not like a whore, but dressing nicely, we will. Yeah, she’s beautiful. We should be presenting that. We should be presenting traditional, archetypical European beauty. Because that is the one thing that is the antithesis of the feminist!

Blair Cottrell: And the minority of amplified feminists who are so often in government positions these days, these are the only sorts of people who would get frustrated or angry by women like Sydney Sweeney looking beautiful. Because this minority of feminists, these government bureaucrats, these boss women, the dictators of the gynocracy, their whole existence is like a protest against traditional feminine beauty, because they don’t feel beautiful! They don’t want any women to be able to feel beautiful. They want to annihilate the standard concept of female beauty and replace it with something that is ugly. So they can feel like they’re normal.

When someone’s got a problem, when someone’s basically deranged, they become like the personification of disease, where they want to spread and make everything else as deranged as possible. So then they feel normal, they don’t feel so deranged anymore. That’s really the only kinds of people who would be upset about female beauty, like what is expressed through Sydney Sweeney. That which is expressed through Sydney Sweeney, I should say. But you said, Mark, I wanted to ask you said that, …

Joel Davis: I want to jump in here quickly though. I want to jump in quickly on what he said. Yeah, because what he was basically saying like I’m not saying that we should celebrate women wearing like no clothes and like just tits and arse out. Like you go down to the shops these days, I’m sure it’s the same in Britain. And every single woman is wearing these, who’s like a young attractive woman is wearing these tight fitting yoga pants.

And it’s like you’re just bombarded with like asses in every direction. That’s like, how did this? It wasn’t like this when I was a kid. It’s out of control! I’m not saying that this is a good thing.

What I am saying is that it’s about the relationship between the masculine, the feminine. The male gaze. What you’re expressing is actually men actually like modesty. The reason why women are all dressing with their arse out like that is because they’re copying other women. It’s not even a masculine ideal. Men don’t like women wearing activewear everywhere all the time. I’ve never heard it, …

Blair Cottrell: Men do look at that. And so they’re, …

Joel Davis: Men do look at it. But like I never heard a man say like, damn, …

Blair Cottrell: Women wouldn’t dress that way if they didn’t feel like they were being rewarded with attention for it. Correct?

Joel Davis: You know what? A man would really get attention if she wore a fkh dress! If she dressed like a woman used to. If she wore like vd

Blair Cottrell: You’d get better quality of attention. Yeah, but as you said, women are copying other women because, …

Joel Davis: Women never wear dresses anymore because they have to signal to the other women that they also drink the same pumpkin spice lattes or matcha or whatever the fuck they’re drinking these days. And they also, …

Blair Cottrell: Let me ask you this, if you saw two women, …

Joel Davis: They’re conforming to the feminine gaze, actually.

[1:23:08]

Blair Cottrell: If you saw two women is a scenario for you? One was wearing the seemingly painted on mini gym shorts with no underwear underneath. And she was walking around like that. And then the other woman was wearing like a traditional dress which covered most of her body.

Which woman would you look at first and which one would you pay more attention to? For most men, they would look at the girl in the mini shorts. That’s the girl that wins over the girl in traditional dress. That’s why women dress in the mini shorts. And it wasn’t acceptable. We didn’t allow women to dress in the mini shorts back in the day. It’s only a recent phenomena that men have become, or society has conditioned men into becoming so weak and quiet that we won’t speak up and say anything about it.

And so that’s the problem, right? It just keeps, it just gets more and more out of control, doesn’t it? Women will keep pushing boundaries until they’re literally walking around in painted on clothes.

And I did say that, I think I said this on a stream like a year ago. I think the next stage of female fashion will be painted on crop tops. Like they’ll just actually start painting clothes on because like there’s not really a way they can start wearing less than they’re currently wearing without just literally airbrushing clothes on. That’ll be the next example of female fashion! It’ll start in the gyms probably, or maybe somewhere else.

But you said, Mark, I wanted to ask you this because I think this will be handy for the young guys. The young guys should benefit from the answer to this question. You said that women like strength, right? But what is your definition of strength? What does strength look like in a man?

Mark Collett: Strength isn’t just physical, it’s a state of mind. And it means not bending. And without being rude about women, women have this mentality where they will push and push and push. And when a man breaks and gives them everything that they want, that isn’t actually what they want, which is the irony. What they want is a man who is going to be strong. That means standing up to them. It means holding a line, it means not eternally giving into them. And it means almost being like a stern father figure.

And I think part of this, if you look at way marriage used to take place, a father used to give away his daughter to her future husband, and it was almost as if the father was passing the daughter into the care of another man who would then take on that role of being the strength, the carerr, in many ways a disciplinarian. And that doesn’t mean you have to be harsh to women. It certainly doesn’t mean you have to beat them or hurt them. But what it does mean is that women have a more impulsive, more compassionate nature that can get them into trouble.

And the man is the counterfoil to that. The man is the one that provides the strength, the discipline, the ability to say no, which is very important. And when you take that strength away and you present a woman with a weak man, she’ll run roughshod over him, eventually chew him up, spit him out, leave him heartbroken and often damage herself in the process.

And a way, I’ll express this as a way that proves this in real life. You often get these very attractive sort of Hollywood feminists who give these long sort of TEDx talks about what a man should be and that he should be:

“Caring and kind and compassionate and help her with everything and listen and not be pushy and let her have the bed when she’s tired and he should sleep on the floor!”

And they never go out with that man! They never go out with him. They end up dating some, like Chad, 6 foot 7, rugby captain with muscles on his muscles, who obviously chucks around the bedroom, pins her down by the throat and makes her absolutely sort of melt every time he opens his mouth or lays his hand on her! Because no woman really wants that weak, pathetic, simping dork! They say they do, but they want the opposite. And that’s the conundrum of the woman. Women are hard to fathom, but fundamentally they want that guy who is going to be a blockade to their own worst instincts.

Blair Cottrell: You’ve got it figured out!

And if you haven’t tried this, you got a girlfriend, you got a wife, and you’re having problems with her. If you haven’t tried saying no, give it a go. Try:

“No, you’re not wearing that out. I’m not going out with you in that. Change your top, or no, you’re not going to that club tonight with your friends. You’re staying here with me. No!”

Try saying no and you might get some if she’s not used to it, you might get some pushback in the moment, but I guarantee you in most circumstances she will respect you more and come to like you more. She’ll become weak at the knees if you just create some boundaries and you don’t compromise on those boundaries. You don’t need to be mean or cruel like when you say no, it has to be coming from a place of care, a place of respect for her and yourself.

Because as you said, Mark, women do have a tendency to push. They want to push boundaries until they get away with what they never should have even been thinking about in the first place. Right. So we often exist to tell women no. That’s basically one of the primary roles of a man in any family relationship situation. We exist to say no, to create boundaries. Pretty simple stuff. Right.

[1:28:41]

Joel Davis: I’m just glad that Mark ended up completing his argument against the Goon Right with a really goonish rant, fantasizing about some 6 foot 7 rugby player just going to town. I think Mark is a gooner! I think he just too. He’s too Boomer. He’s too unk to realise the ironic connotation of the label. But that’s okay.

Yeah, it was good. It was a good discussion. I think it was kind of fun. That’s what I wanted it to be, fun. I wanted it.

Actually. It’s good that Mark came on. It’s a shame [Thomas] Sewell isn’t on because I think Sewell probably would have had hilarious reactions to this as well. But we can keep discussing this subject. The Goon Right is going nowhere. The Goon Right is coming back in a big way or it’s emerging in a big way. I see the trends going in that direction, and yeah, …

But again, I got to mention this again. White Australia.org if you’re in Australia, you want to come to our conference this weekend. It’s going to be spectacular! Sign up as a supporter and then you can get vetted and you can come to the conference Saturday and Sunday, this weekend. If you’re in Melbourne, come check it out. But you have to get vetted. We’re not just gonna let random people show up. We have to keep the event secured. So now’s your last chance to go through the process.

But yeah, I think basically. Yeah, I think basically we’re good for this portion of the show. We could get into like some Superchats or something.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s been a good show.

Mark Collett: Just to jump in here. I’ve got a show in America with Jared Taylor that starts in about 15 minutes. So I’m gonna have to duck out then. But if we’ve done most of the discussions, if there are any Superchats for me, I’d happily answer them first so people don’t feel short-changed.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll have a look. So Dingo Nationalist. This is addressed to you, Mark. He said:

“Mark. Have you heard any indication from any experts or lawyers whether you’ll have a reasonable chance of overturning your 15 year ban from Europe?”

Mark Collett: Yeah, I have. I’ve heard from a lawyer in Sweden who is attached to the nationalist cause. That is the one that’s going to be putting in my appeal. He’s got all my statement of fact now. I’ll be chasing that up later because I want to get it in well before the 21 day deadline. He thinks we’ve got a very good case because my statement of fact is extremely strong. You know, having there is precedent for me going to Europe, there is no precedent for me ever causing disorder and I have no criminal record. So there is no legal basis to ban me. This was a political decision.

However, despite the being a strong legal case, this isn’t the sort of thing that’s heard in court. This is the kind of thing that is heard by a secret panel of political overseers in some office in the European Union, which gives me a lesser chance of success. I’m sure if it went before a proper court, people would be outraged! I’m sure if you told the average Swede:

“Look, we basically let in every non-White who washes up on our shores, roll out the red carpet for them and let you know, sexually assault our daughters. But this White guy who’s against all that and has got no criminal record, we’re not letting him in.”

I’m sure most people will be appalled, but unfortunately that isn’t how it works.

Joel Davis: Yeah, fair enough. Well, I guess let us know how it goes when you go through that process. I’m sure a lot of us would like to know. And you should let The Noticer news know as well because they could cover it because you’re probably not gonna get good coverage in the UK.

Mark Collett: Yeah, they’re great! They wrote an article on me. They’re really friendly. And obviously, look, I really support you guys and love you guys and if people watching now want to show me some support, the best way to do it is to sub me on Rumble. So you’re watching on Rumble. If you want to sub me on Rumble, I’ve got a Rumble channel myself. If you can all hop over there and give it a like, or a sub or whatever it is, that would be appreciated. It doesn’t cost you anything, but just subscribe. Joel’s got a few thousand more followers than me, so if some of them could pop over and sub me, that would be much appreciated.

Joel Davis: This will link to Mark’s Telegram in the description. You can follow Mark on Telegram if you don’t already.

Mark Collett: Yeah, follow me on Telegram but also jump over on Rumble. I’m trying to build my Rumble up. You can also follow me on Odysee and Gab as well.

Joel Davis: This question is also for you, Mark. It’s from Aussie Autist 88. He said:

“Hey, Mark, how much better is the Aussie flag than the British flag?”

Mark Collett: I don’t know. I think they’re both good flags.

I mean, I’m just checking the I mean, I suppose the Australia flag, you could probably say. You could either go one or two ways. You could either say:

“Look, the Australian flag is better because it’s the British flag plus like some little stars.”

So you could say like:

“Yeah, it builds upon the British flag.”

Or you could say:

“It’s less good because it kind of takes perfection and tries to improve on it and just add some stars.”

Blair Cottrell: Is that the most diplomatic answer to that question that could have possibly been!

Joel Davis: Just say the fucking Union Jack is better! You fucking pussy!

[1:33:41]

Blair Cottrell: What he really thinks, guys, this British supremacist, he thinks that the shitty Australian flag is just some crappy offshoot of its parent creator, the Union Jack, the original Union Jack, you know. Come on, mate, let’s just be honest!

Mark Collett: Well, [chuckling] I like to please, I like to please everyone. This is why it’s so shocking that I’m banned from Sweden!

Blair Cottrell: The British flag is like Judaism and the Australian flag is like Christianity. It’s like:

“Hey, we’re the parent religion. The only reason you exist is we’re, …”

Mark Collett: Definitely not like Judaism. And that’s the one thing [chuckling] we’ll never, …

Joel Davis: Blair, really opening up like cans of worms with this. We’re just gonna leave it now.

Blair Cottrell: We’re not doing a religious discussion.

Joel Davis: We’re not going to go there.

Blair Cottrell: We’re ruling that out right now.

Joel Davis: Not gonna go there!

Also, I just want to say hail to all my goon patriots who goon swarmed the Avi Yemeni vs John Roddick debate yesterday with debate Joel Davis in the live chats on X and on YouTube. The spam was crazy! There were points during the stream where there was literally no comment section other than people spamming debate Joel Davis to Avi Yemeni. It was quite funny.

Blair Cottrell: How did he respond to that? Did he still just ignore it?

Joel Davis: He ignored it. I saw Rookshan’s pajeet face like freaking out because he was obviously Manning the live chat while the stream was going on. And yeah, it was quite good. Avi still running from the debate. I’m hoping that we can eventually set it up. I think me versus Avi Yemeni. That debate will break the Internet. I think that that will go insane! That’ll be probably the biggest Australian political debate in years. It will go viral. It’ll get nasty. It needs a moderator because Avi can’t shut the fuck up because he’s just yaps his little yid mouth! In that debate yesterday against John Ruddick, who didn’t do that well, by the way, but John Ruddick couldn’t finish a point without Avi just cutting in with more bullshit!

Blair Cottrell: I’d love to moderate an Avi Yemeni debate with someone.

Joel Davis: I don’t think he would agree to you moderating it, but we could find maybe someone more neutral.

Mark Collett: He’ll never debate you, mate. Tommy won’t debate me. These people are fundamentally cowards! They know that what we say is right. So like with Tommy, I’ve repeatedly said he’s actually threatened to fight me all sorts. And like, he might beat me in a fight, he might be able to knock me out, he might be able to hurt me, but one thing he will never do is sit and talk with me. He does not fear anything where I can’t open my mouth.

He fears me opening my mouth in front of his fans, because he is an absolute multiculturalist. He’s pro-immigration and he supports the genocidal system state of Israel, which is flooding Europe with millions of Arabs. And he doesn’t want anyone to tell his fans that, because he is a foreign agent and he fears the Collett.

And I’m sure that Avi Yemini fears the Davis just as much as Robinson fears the Collett. You know, they can’t be held up to truth. And if Robinson agreed to debate me or Avi Yemini agreed to debate you, Ezra Levant would be in his DMs in seconds literally being like, …

Blair Cottrell: Don’t do it!

Mark Collett: Shut it down! Shut it!

Joel Davis: Stop black pilling, Mark. Stop black-pilling. He’s gonna debate me. It’s gonna happen.

Mark Collett: I’m making you look good. I’m making you look good. I’m saying you’re so above his level. It’d be like Neo in the Matrix fighting those agents. You’d just be sort of chopping them down without even thinking.

And that’s why they fear you. They know you cannot be defeated in a debate by him. In the same way that Tommy knows, you know, he would not have a hope in hell. It’d be like 10 minutes in and it would be an absolute drubbing. You know, you versus Yemeni, you’re like Tyson in his prime and he’s like a blubbing, you know, scrawny, six former. You’d knock him out!

Blair Cottrell: In such a way where if Avi could be made to believe or understand that he will come away from the interview or the debate, and regardless of how it goes, he’s going to appeal to all of those Israel fanatics. They’re all still going to love him. And it’s going to be very entertaining. You know, it could be good for his image, it could be good for his platform, something like that’s the way you’d have to spin it because that’s the only way he would actually go for it. I think there’s a very small chance, though. I don’t think he would do it.

Joel Davis: Someone else can spin it. Get to work. Spinners spin this. Someone sell it to Avi. I know I have friends who have his ear.

Blair Cottrell: You got to say things like:

“Avi, you’re the only one who’s like, smart enough. You’re the only one who has the passion to actually stand up to this Nazi. This is your moment. You know what I mean? We need you!”

That kind of stuff. Like, you gotta really build him up.

Joel Davis: It’s gonna get done. He’s not going to do it right now, but it’s going to get done. We are going to debate. It is inevitable. It’ll be an incredible, like an incredible display of kike rape! And I’m looking forward to it. It is inevitable. It will happen. Everyone must will it into existence. If we focus enough will psychically on it as an outcome and goon swarm his channel, his chat enough elevate the meme to a higher and higher status. Eventually he will capitulate. White Bitch triple six said:

“Hi, gentlemen. Just wanted to wish my buddy Neddie good luck at nationals. I wish I could be there in the flesh.”

Presume that he’s going to be in the White powerlifting event. Modern World Reject said:

“Hail sex and deport stinky!”

That’s kind of a strange Superchat, that one. He Man 1488 just Superchatted his own name. He then Superchatted again, saying:

“I’ve got Tom Sewell’s credit card, so I’m going to town. Blair, give us a bicep flex.”

[1:39:21]

Blair Cottrell: How am I going to do that. I’m wearing a long sleeve shirt. Should I do it? I don’t know.

Joel Davis: You got to get it done!

Blair Cottrell: The man paid $10.

Joel Davis: All right, a little more. $10. Hey, there we go!

Blair Cottrell: Thanks. That’s the best I can do, guys.

Joel Davis: Yeah, that was a pretty cringe Superchat.

But yeah, also people are saying, debate Chalky. He called me out for a debate. I didn’t even know who he was. I agreed to it. I responded to his email. He said he was going to line it up. And that’s it. That’s the last I heard about it.

So I don’t know what’s going on. I guess we’ll find out soon. Is he flaking? Is he delaying? Hopefully delaying. But I was looking forward to that because it’s just very hard to get people to engage me at all because they’re afraid of what might happen. But I’m not a mean guy. I just want to have a conversation. I want to just debate ideas. I don’t know this guy from a bar of soap. I got nothing personal against him.

So, yeah, Chalky, just. Let’s line it up. I think he wants to do it on Joel Jamal’s show or something. Let’s line it up. Got some Entropy Superchats from Annabel Anna Bola Cost, who said:

“Hey, Joel, what’s the estimated timeline in regards to the White Australia party? Keep up the good work.”

Well, the estimated timeline is summertime launch, vaguely, estimated, but nothing’s in stone. Sign up White Australia.org help us get there, but we’re looking good! The numbers are, I don’t think are going to be an issue, but we need to go past the minimum number. You know, you need 1500 signatures to register a political party in Australia. But if we have only 1500 there’s games they could play to try and knock some of those signatures out. So what we need is to get well past that number so we give ourselves some breathing room. So we need as many signups as possible. We need as many members as possible.

So White Australia.org sign up! Help us out. Chevy Morgan said:

“G’day, Joel. I would like to debate you. I would be considered far-Right, however, believe Christian methods are more practical in nationalism. I’m an ex-Lefty as well. I have a small channel on TikTok with 1700 followers with based content. Chevy the Human.”

Well, I don’t go on TikTok.

So you’re gonna have to find a way to talk to me on a different platform because I’m not going to be able to talk to you on TikTok.

What else have we got here? It’s just like people not actually saying anything, just sending money, which I do appreciate.

Blair Cottrell: We just got a $1 Superchat back on Rumble from He Man as well, but I don’t think that’s up to you.

Joel Davis: Give us a flex. Well, I got a jacket on so like what am I gonna have to take my jacket off? Take it off. Gonna have to mog out here right now. Wait, here we go. I’ll give. I’ll give you this on. There we go.

Blair Cottrell: Very nice. That’s one.

And while you were doing that, Mike and Nolzy sent through a 10 Superchat. Thanks very much, mate. He said:

“Good to see you again. Mark, Nolzy from the Racer crew.”

Mark Collett: Thank you. Oh, no!

Blair Cottrell: The next Superchat is:

“Give us a flex, Mark!”

Mark’s gonna do it now. That’s good. That’s impressive. Hey, I like that. He’s got some. He’s got some peak.

Joel Davis: Well, he’s got like whole technique out here.

Mark Collett: Not bad for an old man. Somebody in the chat kept calling me Unk. Not bad for an old man, hey chat?

Joel Davis: Well, that’s the thing. My cope on biceps is I never work out biceps pretty much at all because if you get your biceps too big it actually really impairs your striking.

Blair Cottrell: So here’s the intellectual explanation and slash cope for why Joel had the smaller biceps, at least in this tonight.

Joel Davis: I also do not inject anabolic steroids and as well. But yeah. Ingo nationalist said:

“Joel, do you believe morality is objective or subjective?”

What kind of, I mean this is such a silly question.

Blair Cottrell: Subjective, isn’t it?

Joel Davis: Well, it’s both. Different aspects of it are objective, different aspects of subjective.

Michael Goldberg 123 said:

“Debate Paul Golding.”

Blair Cottrell: Paul Golding? Do you have much of a relationship with him?

[1:44:11]

Mark Collett: Well, I get on with Paul so there’s not really much to debate, and Paul has more or less taken on every position that I have pushed. They’re now for deportations, for re-migration, they don’t allow Israel flags at their demonstrations, they’ve banned them! So I mean I’ve got quite a bit of synergy. It’d be more of a conversation. I mean Britain First as a group have pretty much adopted most of the stuff that we talk about.

I mean at one time I’d say he’d have had more synergy with Tommy Robinson but now he has more synergy with the ethno-nationalist Right because they’re doing marches for re-migration and as I said, they aren’t shilling for Israel. In fact they’ve banned Israeli flags at demonstrations which is what we want to see. There’s nothing worse than going to a nationalist demo and seeing a load of bloody Israeli flags. I mean that is the sign of a controlled opposition event.

Joel Davis: Well it’s good to see the Overton Window shift. And you know what we’re noticing in Australia as well is that the Israel shilling is taking a nose dive on the Australian right.

Obviously the controlled major parties, One Nation, Liberal, National, they still shill for Israel like crazy! But outside of that everyone’s turning on Israel, everyone’s turning on the jewish lobby in Australia very quickly and that was something that was unheard of basically only a couple years ago really.

So it’s great to see, great development to see, you know, an anti-zionist Right, a patriot anti-zionist position where you know my position, as I’ve said many times before, I’m not pro-Palestine but I’m anti-Israel. Like I’m not anti-Palestine, I’m just neutral on Palestine, but I’m anti, I’m anti-Israel. Palestine doesn’t do anything to me, Israel does! Israel completely has completely obliterated free speech in our country with literal massage psyops and the coordination of the diaspora lobby to attack our freedom of speech and try to put people like me in jail.

So why the fuck, why the fuck would I not be anti-Israel?

Blair Cottrell: It’s pretty concerning how much influence they have in Australia though, despite Israel not being very popular amongst the masses. Like the influence the jewish lobby clearly has over politics, police. It is still very concerning.

Joel Davis: It is, it is! But what we’re seeing is the beginning of a patriot anti-zionist Right.

And obviously the Left, the Left aren’t huge fans of Israel. Even though the centre Left parties can still be captured by Israel linked Zionist linked power networks to control their policies somewhat.

But you know Israel has never been this unpopular, and it’s only becoming increasingly less and less popular, and particularly with young people as well young people from on the Left and the Right, for different reasons, agree on basically only one thing which is the “Fuck Israel” position. So it’s a beautiful thing.

Sean McKenzie said:

“All my moggers Nazis!”

And he also said:

“Debate Avi stop being a pussy!”

I’m trying to debate Avi! He’s the one being a pussy.

Blair Cottrell: I think there’s this in-joke in the chat where everyone’s pretending like you’re scared of him. That’s been going on for a while.

Joel Davis: Yeah, okay. That’s kind of funny, I guess. Oh, yeah, He Man 1488 said:

“White pride world-wide. In the end, we win.”

Just want to point out that he man 1488 keeps sending $1 Superchats, the minimum Superchat and just spamming Superchats. This is what I like to call a cheap cunt! You know, he wants to have a lot to say, but he doesn’t want to pay too much for it. Gonna shame him for that. Pay up bitch! You know, we’ll still read them out, but like have some honour, have some pride, send me some fucking cash.

But anyway, that’s the end of the show. I think we. I think Mark has to go. Blair and I, we’ve got a lot to do. Big weekend coming up. We gotta compete in the White powerlifting competition and we got to give speeches. We got people coming from all around Australia that we’re hosting down here in Melbourne. It’s going to be a huge festival of racism this weekend. And yeah, should be quite interesting to see how it plays out.

Blair Cottrell: But thanks for joining us, guys and thanks, Mark. Thanks for your time. We just had one more Superchat from White Bitch triple six who says:

“Here’s some more sugar for the lads.”

Well, thanks very much.

Joel Davis: That goes pretty hard. Oh, Hail Yay also said:

“Drew Pavlou said he’s worried about debating you again because his family got doxed last time. He said he would be down to do it if he had a no dox guarantee.”

I didn’t dox his fucking family. I don’t know why he keeps pushing this line, but yeah, of course I’m not going to dox your family, Drew. I don’t have any interest in doxing your family. I do have an interest, however, in streaming with you. Even it could be a debate or it could be a friendly stream, because I just like the guy, but whatever he’s down for, I’m down for. I’m a slut for Drew Pavlou content.

But that’s basically the end of the show. Thanks, Mark, for coming on.

Mark Collett: Thank you so much! I’m gonna dash now, guys. Can I jump on this other show? But thank you for your time. It’s always been a pleasure. Enjoyed the debate, enjoyed the banter, enjoy the flex and look forward to working with you guys again soon. I really am looking forward to White Australia becoming a party and seeing how you do. So good luck with your future in endeavours and no doubt we’ll all stream again soon. Thank you so much!

Joel Davis: Yeah. Thanks, mate. White power! Hail victory! Blood and honour!

[1:49:53]

END

top

============================================

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/7/2025 = 28)

ThigASteach
Supporter
10 hours ago
595 watching and 70 likes!! Come on folks. These good lads could use some more support. Tis little enough to hit a thumbs up! #PeaceAndRespect #GodBless
8 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
8 hours ago
That’s insane that he can’t even go on holiday in Europe anymore, life-wrecking stuff.
5 likes

Report
PaleDissident
9 hours ago
great stream
4 likes

Report
Ruminoid
10 hours ago
Women (or men for that matter) havent conspired to be where we’re at. When are you going to speak about corrupt Jewish satanic influence and influencers of music and Hollywood.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 hours ago
You crypto jews never stop talking about yourselves. I wish you guys would stfu about your religion and your preferred boogeyman. ”da world would be a utopia if there were no jooos” derp.. fucktards.. stupid fucks.. halfwits..
0 likes

Report
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 hours ago
when do we get the Jew fatigue? Never? I don’t know about your little shitholes but America has over hundred million nonwhites that people stop talking about because they are too busy talking about the Jews over everything else. They say black fatigue is when you get tired of mentioning black people. Well why the fuck haven’t people grown tired of Israel, the Jews, and Satan? Some bullshit.
0 likes

Report
EinZweiDrei
4 hours ago
Joel was a bit off base on the sexual energy thing imo. Our “vitality” should come from being physically fit and having Christian ethics.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
EinZweiDrei
3 hours ago
Sorry to Joel if I’m interpreting him incorrectly. Great stream btw.
0 likes

Report
JQRC
Supporter+
9 hours ago
This was the wrong stream to debut the Gooner Right. This is a serious matter but should have made the point we are the youthful cool movement. Mark basically is the moralizing stuffy nice guy that says we dont have fun over here. Good luck with your Boomers, cause the Gooners are taking over!
2 likes

Report
ReclaimMan
5 hours ago
Mark’s ex-gf is a cutie, glad I got to see that
2 likes

Report
MeineEhreheisstTreue
3 hours ago
Take a holiday in St. Petersburg. The Venice of Russia.
2 likes

Report
Schutztaffel
5 hours ago
Sounds like Joel is just rationalizing his own private escapades.
1 like

Report
Dissident_Loner
Supporter
4 hours ago
the world is run by criminally insane megalomaniac perverts…something’s going to give eventually…
1 like

Report
Stopwhitegenocide1488
2 hours ago
Joel looks like a hasidic Jew with that hairstyle.
1 like

Report
Restlessdreams88
44 minutes ago
rap music is fucking gay
1 like

Report
katana17
12 hours ago
[Joel Davis – Another Week of Political Drama – Jul 27, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/08/03/joel-davis-another-week-of-political-drama-jul-27-2025-transcript/ In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the political drama concerning Blair and Tom and the alleged Nazi salute; and other topics.
0 likes

Delete
Neqis
7 hours ago
Such a short episode :((
0 likes

Report
Schutztaffel
6 hours ago
Keith Woods is definitely on the powder
0 likes

Report
PureWhitey
5 hours ago
Mark must have been gaming on his phone when Joel was making his point because he missed it completely.
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
2 hours ago
The “Lookmaxer” guy Nick spoke to recently was incredibly feminine, basically a f6ggot.
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
2 hours ago
Wait, we’re now pro-watching Jew porn and wasting our lives in the process? What’s going on? :S
0 likes

Report
david43
2 hours ago
these stories almost sound unbelievable if I haven’t been following these situations.. are there no good police officers that can speak up, in America there not supposed to follow unconstitutional orders but even here there are barely any good men… Such a crazy story if this guy is telling the truth….
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
1 hour ago
Why would you use the word goon if you weren’t referring to porn?
0 likes

Report
MeineEhreheisstTreue
1 hour ago
Joel has a point in the sense that sexuality is good but I would say that sexuality must be divided into Eugenic Sexuality vs Dysgenic Sexuality. The Monkish asexual mindset is dysgenic.
0 likes

Report
shovelheadamy
1 hour ago
Would it be accurate to say that women these days sometimes need a light spanking on the bum…
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
shovelheadamy
1 hour ago
…never in anger of course.
0 likes

Report
GustavusVasa
Supporter+
1 hour ago
Gooniest episode ever Mark was on tonight
0 likes

Report
Seanybruv
10 hours ago
assuaged is pronounced uh-swayjd, not uh-sawjd
-2 likes

==========================

See Also

top

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript