Joel Davis: We are live, and I know we are late, and I haven’t even looked at the live chat. There’s actually some glitch on my laptop where I can’t actually see anything in the live chat on Rumble. Sure, everyone is complaining that we’re late. But oh, I guess suck shit you get in your show.

Anyway, we’re starting and we’re here. Tom’s sick, so maybe Jacob will be joining us. But Tom is sick, so there’s no Tom.

But it’s The Joel and Blair Show, so you should be okay without him. How you doing this evening, Blair?

Blair Cottrell: I’m great. It’s good to. Good to be back.

My first line, I’m already stuttering, but I’m awake. I promise I’m awake. I’m awake enough, and I’m excited. I’m excited to get into another week of news and Right-wing perspective or Nazi point of view, if that’s the way you want to look at it. How about you, Joel? How are you feeling?

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’m feeling pretty good. Feeling quite good, actually.

Blair Cottrell: I hope you’re feeling better than your hair looks.

Joel Davis: I kept trying to make this thing that’s sticking up here to stop sticking up, but I don’t know.

Blair Cottrell: It might be time for a haircut, bro. Just throwing it out there. You’re still an attractive man, so don’t worry.

Joel Davis: Yeah, it might be time for a haircut, but I don’t know, I’ve got, like, a distinctive look going on. I don’t know if I want to just go back to some, like, normie cut. I like to be different.

But anyway, the show this evening, I think we should just get straight into it, because I haven’t actually spoken to you about this, but kind of funnily enough, I think this act, literally is the biggest story in racism globally right now, is this story which builds off the back of, …

A lot of people who are on Twitter will know the account at Barry Stanton GBP, and it’s one of the funnier accounts on Twitter.

Basically, he had a profile picture of this kind of old British guy. You would imagine Baz down the pub having a pine of Carling. And he had this whole bit where he was like, this racist boomer, but it’s kind of evolved where now he’s just going, like, full, hardcore tirade, basically calling people the n-word and getting away with it and just heaps of anti-pajeet posting, anti-jew posting as well. Pro Hitler posting, pro, you know, British patriot posting. Just a lot of just so much based stuff. But his account is going ridiculously viral. Like, whenever anyone goes on the timeline, you just see heaps of Barry Stanton tweets with insane amounts of likes and views and he’s just become so powerful, it’s ridiculous! Like, he’s just like, dominating Right-wing Twitter, this force.

And somehow Twitter banned him from having a profile picture, which I’ve never seen before. So he has no profile picture, but it only made him stronger.

Anyway, you see his stuff all over Twitter. I think particularly the anti-anti Indian posting seems to have really been picked up by the algorithm and as a result, now World bank has halted its advertising on Twitter because basically its ads were seen. I’ll read the article here. The World bank has ceased all paid advertising on Elon Musk’s social media platform X, which was formerly Twitter, after a CBS news investigation found promoted advertisements from the organisation showing up under a racist post from account that prolifically posts pro-Nazi and White nationalist content. CBS news found that a verified X account with more than 115,000 followers had posted a racist image alongside a post praising Europe’s colonisation of Africa.

Anyway, the post is literally this. It was a picture of some shitty part of London where blacks live and it said, Africans in Europe. And it’s real dirty. And then a picture of this is probably in South Africa.

Blair Cottrell: There’s worse stuff on X. Why is this a big deal?

Joel Davis: Yeah, and it’s just true. It’s like, these are Africans in Europe, these are Europeans in Africa. It’s just true. It’s just two different pictures which are true.

But yeah, the truth is racist. As we’ve been saying, our enemies in both ourselves and our enemies agree that the truth is racist. We’re just happy about it and they’re not. That’s really the only distinction.

But, yeah, so this is interesting because obviously there’s a lot of pressure that has been piling up upon Twitter to censor the platform. But I’ll be honest, like, of course there’s some big accounts that are kept off, but I think the censorship seems to have relaxed over the last few months. If anything, people are cutting quite loose on the timeline in a way that I haven’t really seen in many, many years. And really hardcore racial stuff is going gangbusters, like the really kind of supremacist or hateful connotation, or look at how disgusting this Indian is. These kinds of posts are going viral and that’s one of the most tame Barry Stanton tweets, to be honest.

And it’s just a very interesting paradigm, because for a very long time, the narrative was that we don’t want to be hateful, we don’t want to be supremacist. We want to come across as though we love everyone and we’re just rational and reasonable. And here’s our agreeable arguments as to why people deserve rights, too, or why people should have their own countries as well.

Apparently, this was supposed to be the way that we outreach to the masses and the so-called egregious wignat, racist supremacist hardcore content was holding us back. Apparently, it made us look unhinged. It made us look hateful. And this apparently would push away normal people. This wouldn’t be popular.

But it seems like those trends are the complete opposite on Twitter right now. It seems like actually, and I posted about this on Telegram last night, it seems like the opposite logic is actually starting to express itself now that we have freedom to post almost anything on Twitter.

But, you know, we’re able to go pretty hard on Twitter, unlike we have been able to in many, many years, to the point where you can have 4chan level discourse on Twitter.

And also Twitter, I think, removing you used to be able to see every account you click on their likes and you could see all the tweets that they liked. That’s no longer the case that got changed. People criticise that, but in a way, maybe that has inspired a lot of accounts to grow some balls and just like, whatever they want because they’re not afraid of coming across in a negative way because they like something. You can only see who likes your tweet if it’s your tweet, but no one else can see if they liked it.

And so as a result of these changes, it seems like, yeah, the really hardcore content is actually doing very, very well on Twitter.

And I think it’s illustrating a principle of propaganda, which I think really is the essence of Goebbels philosophy of propaganda, which is that emotion, not reason, is really the essence of good propaganda. You want to grab people in a kind of visceral way, connect to deep seated emotions. It’s not about calmly laying out your case rationally so much in propaganda as presenting your enemy in a way that provokes a strong emotional reaction in the target audience and presenting yourself in a very sympathetic light. Like, another thing that I’m seeing is there’s a lot of pro-White content, which basically is just, it just presents a bunch of sexy White people being sexy.

And then there’s like some swastika and some Hitler edited into it or something, and content like that goes crazy! Or just a picture of a hot White chick with an ugly black chick.

And it’s like one race, the human race is sarcastically put as the caption or something like this stuff goes wild as well on Twitter. And this is apparently distasteful and morally offensive and all the rest of it.

But I think people like morally offensive, distasteful, visceral propaganda.

Blair Cottrell: So this is illustrating they like it more than they used to the new dissent is a more extreme or more raw message than it was seven years ago. Like old dissent was:

“Reduce immigration, Islam is bad, protect our culture, and we stand against the Left.”

That was dissent seven or eight years ago. Dissent now is:

“Here’s why Hitler was right. Racism is natural and good, and Leftists aren’t human!”

So dissent has evolved. It’s become more radical or just more straightforward. What do you think about that? Is that a good thing? It’s more fun.

Joel Davis: Um, well, I think it is because the political situation that we face is a situation that is so desperate in a certain way because our enemies have so much power, so much of the odds are stacked against us. And really the problem is that Whites in general lack confidence. They lack aggression. They lack, yeah, they lack force of will. They’re constantly kind of morally second guessing themselves and feel this social pressure to come across in a certain way.

Whereas particularly in an online setting where people can be anonymous and have freedom to explore ideas and opinions that they would feel, that would ostracize them in normal social situations, that frees White people up to then tap into the dark side, tap into what’s been repressed, tap into the places they’re not allowed to go. And there’s a certain kind of allure because racism has been charged with so much social stigma, and then it creates a kind of allure, paradoxically, a kind of, ooh, that’s a little bit fun because it’s precisely because it’s been repressed.

Like, a lot of homosexuals, for example, claim that it kind of sucks for them now that everyone accepts gays because it’s not as fun. Used to be more fun when everyone hated gays. Maybe it’s more fun to be racist when everyone hates racists. I don’t know. I don’t really want to equate racism with sodomy, obviously, but there is a certain allure to moral transgression.

Moreover, the, …

Blair Cottrell: Is racism truly moral transgression? Is that what it is?

Joel Davis: Well it’s all relative. It’s transgressive against the morality of our current society. We could say it’s nothing. Is there an objective moral framework? Would that objective moral framework prohibit racism? I would say no, insofar as it could exist, because racism is completely natural and it’s based in truths like that. Barry Stanton, Meme, “Africans in Europe, Europeans in Africa”, it’s just true. It’s just a statement of fact. When you post a picture of a disgusting Indian and they just look ugly, and then you put them up against a pretty White girl and you say, one race, the human race, sarcastically. It’s appealing to your implicit aesthetic judgements. You know, that one person looks almost like a different species than the other person just looking at the two of them. And it’s saying:

“How ridiculous is this notion? One race, the human race?”

You can aesthetically feel that there’s something wrong about this anti-racist ideal, and that offends the enemy because they must also make the same aesthetic judgement. They must also be able to feel the same way. It would be incomprehensible!

Blair Cottrell: Do you ever have this experience where it suddenly becomes clear how desensitized to general racism you are compared with standard Australian citizens? Because we surround ourselves more so often than regular people with autistic racists and National Socialist activists and so forth. And these people are casually racist pretty much in all their conversations. And it starts feeling quite normal. It’s not until you have a conversation with a regular person at work somewhere in society and you see them either laugh or react in a way that’s kind of expressing shock! You kind of stop and acknowledge at that point that, wow, like, what I said wasn’t even that extreme. And this person’s, like, really stunned by it. It really puts into perspective how sensitive the average citizen still is to racism, because I’m not sensitive to it anymore.

I mean, I’ve been called a “Nazi” that many times, as have many people in my community.

And so the word kind of just loses its bite, but that only, it only loses its bite to me personally, to other people. I wonder, does racism and the phrase Nazi, does it still hold the same taint that it once did? What do you think? Is it becoming more of an accepted thing? Is it becoming more of a normal thing? Because based on my experience with ordinary people, it’s really not like in private conversations behind closed doors, amongst family members. Yeah, people will be racist, but it’s still extremely taboo in Open Society, for obvious reasons, because there’s social and financial consequences. But do you think it’s better now for us than it was in the past? Do you think it’s easier to get people to open up to casual racism than it was before? What do you reckon?

Joel Davis: I think it is, but it depends.

And this is why I wanted to talk specifically about the question, because I identified this, actually, last year. I said I think we should focus as a movement more of our propaganda specifically against Indian migration. And I said this would be true, particularly in the Australian context, because Indians are the largest group of migrants that are coming in now. And now they’re the largest non-White group in Australia. But there was other reasons why as well, one being that I think there’s a visceral reaction that people have of disgust towards Indians.

And you can see the anti-Indian propaganda, like we look at, like, for example, the propaganda that is racist against blacks. It talks about crime rates, you know, it talks about violence, etcetera. With Indians, it’s not so much what Indians do to us. And we’ll talk a little bit about how Indians are sexual predators or whatever, the whole send bobs in virgin meme. But most of it is kind of just how disgusting are these people? You know, and this, like, scatological association and yeah, just like that. It just plays upon their inherent, revulsive nature that people find detestable about them. And then it triggers all of these really, like, visceral responses where they think about their experiences with Indians and how just displeasurable they are socially, professionally to work a lot of the propaganda, though, is just that they stink, they’re ugly, they smell bad. You know, it’s really basic stuff.

But when I talk about Indians in a negative way with normies, whether it be when I’ve been employed at various places or hanging out with normie friends who maybe don’t really know who I am or even if they know who I am, I find that they’re very open to basically being racist against Indians. Where if I spoke about black people or I spoke about jews, there would be. I spoke about black people. They would feel apprehensive and guilty because there’s this connotation of what we enslaved them. And they’ve watched all these Hollywood movies over the years about the black man that just can’t catch a break and has to struggle his way to the top. And there’s been all these inspirational black sports heroes that have been presented to us in different actors that are black guys that we’re supposed to identify with, that have been heroes in all of these Hollywood movies. And black people have a certain charisma. They’re able to solicit sympathy because they have a certain kind of coolness, a certain charisma. They make music that people like. Anyone who’s into sport or culture in some way who’s a normie will probably, like certain, like, famous black people and think that they’re cool. Indians don’t have any of that.

And when you talk about jews, obviously that evokes the Holocaust and genocide, but also in a more. With more politicised people, they realise that if you go against the jews, that opens up a whole can of worms. It’s kind of scary, right? Because jews are so powerful. They’ve got all these institutions that will come after you if you speak against them. But Indians don’t have that either. They don’t have all of these pro-Indian institutions set up to attack like, to attack anti-semites or. They don’t have all of the sympathy that has been built up culturally to kind of make you seem like an asshole if you speak negatively about blacks and aren’t sufficiently sympathetic and make, you know, make black sympathetic characters.

So as a result of all of this, they’re kind of like the easy sitting duck for racists, because they’ve just come in recently. They don’t really have this whole cultural and institutional apparatus set up to defend them. They don’t have a sympathetic narrative that people have been brainwashed with. They’re not sympathetic as people because they’re personality like. They’re just not cool. And they’re the least cool race.

Blair Cottrell: They seem to think they’re pretty cool! They, like, visually, from what I can tell, they think they’re pretty cool! Have you noticed that as well? They say the same.

Joel Davis: It makes them objectionable, you know?

Blair Cottrell: Right. There’s, like, an inability to see themselves from the perspective of others. Like, they’ve got this idea about themselves, and that’s all that matters.

My primary grievance concerning Indians, as I’ve raised before, is noise pollution, Indian children running around the streets where I live, barefoot and screaming at midnight on a work night. What’s going on there? Where are the parents? The parents don’t seem to mind. The parents are all inside jabbering on about something or on some loud international phone call at all hours of the morning. Have you noticed that?

If you’re watching this, you probably notice this if you go, you know, travel via Uber or ride share service. Look, the three situations where you’re going to be speaking with an Indian person are probably in rideshare, at convenience store slash 711 service stations, or when some government or bank bureaucrat rings you to try to get you to complete some survey or they’re analyzing your life or something like that. Your banking details. That happens sometimes.

And first of all, it’s very difficult and frustrating to listen to Indian people try to speak English. They’re very bad at it. Unless they were born and raised here. Their accent is. It’s just an atrocious accent to try to listen to. It’s something that frustrates you and I don’t think there’s any accent that is more frustrating for me personally, especially when you’re dealing with people who are in either position of government. They’re working in management for a bank or even in healthcare, and you can’t properly understand them, but they also can’t properly understand you. What kind of fucking sense does that make? It doesn’t make any sense. It’s ridiculous!

But this country is ridiculing itself by allowing a free flow of Indian migrants into the country and then propping them up in positions where they’re causing general strife and frustration because no one can fucking understand what they’re saying.

But like I said, it’s not just the accent. The accent is some. They’re always talking. That’s what I was trying to get at. They’re always on the phone. They’ve always got their Airpods in. They’re always talking in rideshare services in public places, if they live near you, they’re always carrying on and making noise. And I honestly think because I’ve got some experience in public protests and from public protesting and being counter-protested by Marxist activists, I learnt the term “noise pollution”. Protesters consciously employ this method to try to drown out the opposing side or just drive away people who aren’t sympathetic to their ideology specifically. They’ll make as much noise as they can. And Indians, probably not consciously, but maybe it’s part of collective instinct. They seem to be doing this, and the result is that people leave. People leave the area, they move away and they avoid them.

And I think this is why Indians end up sort of clustering up in various suburbs and taking over certain areas. Residential areas, I think don’t underestimate the power of noise pollution. They may be doing it as part of a collective instinct to drive us away, but I don’t think they need to try very hard to drive the majority of Australian population away. I think people just don’t want to be near them generally, and for various reasons that are, you know, legitimate grievances. It’s not just blind racism:

“Oh, we don’t like these people because of the way they look.”

Or something like. They just don’t seem to have the same basic manners and way of conducting themselves, which expresses the general politeness and concern for others that we are raised with, probably because they come from a country that has billions in numbers and they’re not really used to showing basic concern and consideration to their fellows.

But, yeah, noise pollution, I can’t stand it! Can’t stand the accents. Can’t stand the noise. It’s constant!

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s real. And I haven’t worked in it myself, but I’ve had a lot of close friends who have. Who work in it and the stories they tell me because obviously there’s a lot of Indians who work in it and the constant buck passing, lying, like, deceptive nature where. And kind of leaning upon you, expecting you to do all the work the way that they nepotistically aid one another. And I’ve experienced this, too. Working with Indians. They are conniving. They try to do the least amount of work possible. They’re seriously incompetent, they’re dumb, but also lazy.

And they also treat you like you’re dumb in the way that they try to scam you and manipulate you.

But then, because they group up and can pull this kind of racism card in corporate settings as well, to protect themselves, they’re very difficult to get rid of or deal with. So anyone who has to work with Indians hates it. Women, generally speaking, hate Indians the most. Like I find with women, women are more offended by racism on average, when you express racist opinions.

But at the same time, when you talk negatively of Indians, even I’ve experienced, you know, Left-wing women who, when I start saying racist shit about Indians, they just go along with me. They completely drop their whole Left-wing ideology because they’ve had so many negative experiences of creepy Indian men saying sexually explicit things to them or maybe trying to touch them in a weird way or stalk them or look at them with freaky looking eyes and yeah.

Blair Cottrell: What is the Indian mating strategy? Describe it.

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, if you look at how ugly Indians are.

Blair Cottrell: Hang on. Before you continue, describe the Indian mating strategy. And compare it to our mating strategy in contrast.

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. So I’m just starting at this point to illustrate my theory. Indians are so ugly. The women, you know, they’re hairy. They don’t have good figures. They don’t have good. Like, they’re just the most ugly race!

Blair Cottrell: Do you think that. Do you think that. Let me butt in quickly. Do you think the general lack of muscle mass and the unappealing physical features are a result of Indians actually being a hybrid race? They aren’t actually a natural human species. They’re the result of a mass intermixture of different races. Do you think that’s what it is?

Joel Davis: Yeah, definitely! I think that’s definitely the case.

But also, if we think about what a race needs to perpetuate itself, like, Whites are equality over quantity race. Right. That’s why we have a mating strategy. That is what they call! Selected in the sense that it’s about high long term investment. We I think in particular, northwest Europeans have the greatest predisposition towards monogamous bonding. We can see this even in the pre. It wasn’t just something that Christianity brought to us or something that, like, monogamy was something that was practiced in even more ancient northwest European societies in a somewhat unique way. A lot of rest of the world had a lot more polygamy for its upper class Mendez as a norm.

But anyway, the point is that Indians are so ugly.

So if you had to think about how would the sexuality of an Indian have to be tuned in order to want to have sex with Indian women? Like Indian male? Well, the Indian male would have to be made so horny and so desperate that he would find having sex with a disgusting Indian woman alluring, that he would have a passion for it. And obviously, there’s 1.4 billion of them on the planet. So he must have a very intense passion for breeding with the Indian female. So because they’re. Because the race lacks quality. It requires quantity, right?

So the Indian has to biologically, by necessity, for the Indian genome to spread itself and conquer the world and take on territory and so on, and has to basically do it through raw biomass, and that biomass multiplies itself through the depraved, horny nature of the Indian male, who has to be basically wanting to rape anything that moves in order to perpetuate that disgusting race in perpetuity.

You know if I had the option of, basically becoming some, like, volsel and just dying alone, and having sex with an Indian woman every night, I would choose to be a volsel and die alone because I’m an Aryan. I need to actually have a woman that of quality in order to actually inspire me to want to breed. And that’s because I come from a line of high quality women and high quality men who have those breeding standards, and that produces a high quality European civilisation where we have things like high culture and morality, like social standards and so on, and a culture of honour and respect.

The Indian lacks these things. The Indian completely lacks these things because he needs to lack these things. If an Indian started having this kind of standards of a White person, well, then he would become kind of also repulsed by his own people and would no longer perpetuate it. So therefore, I think depravity necessarily is the breeding strategy of such a race.

And as you say, it’s a mixed hybrid race. We see this similar tendencies in the Middle Eastern peoples, who are also a mixed hybrid race, where the stories that you get came out of Afghanistan and places like that, where all the child rape and they’re having sex with goats and all this kind of stuff. And this stuff goes on in India as well, I mean, the horror stories that you hear coming out of India about the rape and the depravity of the paedophilia and all the rest of it. You see videos on Twitter of some Indian guy puts on a dress, and then all the Indian men just basically jump on him and rape him because he looks like a woman. They just have, like this insane, sex crazed, frenetic energy.

And so, you know, that turns women off. So that also, I think, enables it to be a socially acceptable form or the most socially acceptable form of racism, precisely because women, in many respects, uphold the social paradigm somewhat more than men, because women are more likely to get offended. And when a man gets offended at something that you say, you can have a kind of dispute that could potentially go to blows.

And so a weak man, if he gets offended in many social situations at what I say, will choose not to say anything. He’ll wait and say something behind my back because he’s afraid of confronting me, because there’s a potential for physical violence, whereas a woman doesn’t fear that I’m going to beat her up because in our society, we don’t put our hands on women.

And so a woman will get offended at what I say and then develops this confidence to be able to express her opinion and express her offence and her emotions, because women are encouraged to express their emotions more than men. There’s no threat of violence, generally speaking, over their head. So as a result, women are more influential over the social paradigm. So a form of racism that appeals to women is therefore going to be a more socially advantageous and selected form of racism.

Blair Cottrell: I heard a really interesting remark from one of our colleagues in Melbourne about a week ago, because he grew up in Soviet Union, I think it was a Ukrainian province, and he said at the time where he was born. And afterwards, though, it was a much more. This is pivoting from the point a little bit, but it’s interesting still. He said it was more socialist at that point and less communists. And I kind of understand the distinction he was trying to make there.

Basically, what he means is it was less hardline, but what he said was, socialism is actually really good if you’re interested in girls or women generally. And his reason was, in socialist society, everyone makes the same amount of money. So it doesn’t matter if you’re a doctor, doesn’t matter if you’re a taxicab driver. Women basically marry anyone because it doesn’t make a difference who has the money. No one has the money, right, except government officials and a very small percentage of people at the top of the strata. I thought that was interesting. I thought:

“Well, yeah, that would be one perk, I suppose.”

Because once economic value and wealth is eliminated from the female measurement process, male measurement process, well, what are they going to go for after that? Probably genetics. I mean, genetics are high on the priority list for women. I think for some women, they are as high as wealth, and for some women, not as high as wealth.

But that was just an interesting conversation I had with this fella, and I never really considered that as a actual benefit of living in socialist society that some of the more beautiful women would be available to marry because wealth isn’t a thing that they’re actually looking for because it doesn’t exist in the broad strata.

Joel Davis: Maybe that’s a good argument for socialism. You know, like the sexy guys have fair, not get, like, out-competed by, like, rich, ugly guys more beautiful, more beautiful selection process, you get more hotties. Unfortunately, socialism seems to have the opposite effect, though. It seems to enable a lot of the dysgenic breeding to keep perpetuating itself in a lot of it depends what kind of socialism. We’ve got. A, obviously, on this show, we advocate for National Socialism, which means we want a kind of robust eugenics program, which we discussed last week on the show somewhat extensively but, yeah, back to this subject of anti-Indian hatred. I think it’s particularly poignant in Australia and Canada, but also in Britain, because they get a lot of Indian immigrants there.

But it’s particularly Australia and Canada that seem to really get in New Zealand to an extent that really get inundated with Indians relative to total population size. And as, like, a portion of total immigrants. Like, they get a lot of Indian immigrants in America, but America gets immigrants from so many different places that they’re just a small snapshot. And it also seems like in America, they get the high quality Indians. Like, the Indians they get into America are like H1-B visa* Indians.

[* The H-1B is a Visa in the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 101, that allows U.S. employers to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations. It is the largest Visa category in the United States in terms of guest worker numbers. A specialty occupation requires the application of specialised knowledge and a Bachelor’s degree or the equivalent of work experience. Wikipedia]

In other words, Indians that work in tech or usually like a higher stock, higher IQ portion of their population that makes it into America.

And then the lower grade Indians then go to Canada or Australia or something.

So Americans don’t seem to fully grasp reasons why Canadians and Australians hate Indians so much, because the Indians that they meet are of a bit of a higher quality.

But nevertheless, in Australia and Canada, they are an absolute menace. And they’re coming in with incredible speed and incredible size, particularly in recent years. And Canadians are widely known as basically the nice guys of the White race. Canadians, you know, they’re probably some of the most, least racist Whites in many respects. They’re very wholesome. They’re very chungus.*

[* Chungus is a meme featuring a chunky version of the cartoon character Bugs Bunny, typically captioned Big Chungus. It began as gaming joke that spread online as a slang term for anything (adorably) “chunky,” similar to chonky.]

But from what I’ve seen coming out of Canadian social media and my friends in Canada, it seems like anti-pigeon racism is rapidly spreading and intensifying in Canadian society, which goes to show how potent the Indian can be as a trigger for racial consciousness. And we’re noticing a similar dynamic here.

So for those reasons, I think you kind of want to strike the enemy at their weakest point, right? You know, obviously, we want to teach people about the problems with all other races and the necessity to maintain a White only political order and to take the side of your own race in general. Not just dislike Indians, but you don’t mind Asians or jews or something.

Obviously, we reject that. We are racialists. We are ethno-nationalists.

But if you can find some form of racism for people to embrace at least one form, now you’re kind of getting somewhere. You know, a lot of people thought that would be the same logic with the anti-muslim thing, but the problem with that is that it can be kind of portrayed as the problem is with their religion, not with the people. So, like:

“If they would just convert to Christianity or become atheists or something, it would be fine. Like, our problem isn’t with Middle Eastern people. It’s their religion, it’s their culture. That’s the problem, not the people.”

But that’s an expression of the people. You know, there are, you know, Indonesian Muslims that don’t behave the same as Middle Eastern Muslims because they’re Indonesians, even if they have the same religion. And I don’t like the religion of Islam.

But the point is that that’s not the fundamental problem.

And you can see that, particularly in Britain, with people like Tommy Robinson and so on, who kind of redirect a certain kind of racist instinct into a kind of religious dispute. So with the issue with Indians doesn’t really, because people aren’t. The issue isn’t with Hinduism. The issue is with Indians. You know, then also when you have, like a kind of anti-East Asian form of racism, East Asians are kind of the nicest, most civilised other race from, in most people’s personal experience. And I know that there’s lots of negative experiences that people have with East Asians that we could go into, but a lot of people are positively predisposed towards them.

So that’s a kind of a harder target to fixate upon. In Australia, we could talk about the problems with the Chinese because there’s the Chinese state is so big and powerful and has influence over Australia, and people can and get concerned about that.

But it’s more of an abstract political problem than an interpersonal problem.

So it’s a bit harder than the anti-Indian racism to provoke.

And then when it comes to the jewish question, a lot of people don’t really have much experience interpersonally with jews. And the jewish problem is, again, it’s kind of more abstract. It’s more, it’s a little bit, it requires a little bit more discussion to explain it to someone. People have to read and talk and learn to learn about jews, whereas, like Indians, you just have to basically experience an Indian. And most people now have in their everyday life in any kind of, particularly in a major Australian city, but most major Western cities, you will experience them.

And so therefore, it’s an easy target.

And as I said with blacks before, like that, blacks, you know, they’re easy to kind of get people to understand the problems with, but at the same time, they have a lot of cultural and moral sympathy that they’re able to solicit and a certain charisma.

So when we kind of look at all the options for a target, an easy target to fixate upon the Indian and also Indians are spreading all over the world at an incredibly fast rate. They just seem to be multiplying, multiplying, multiplying everywhere, like some kind of virus and infection.

So therefore they’re like the perfect target, I think, for racism to blow up and become, in a certain sense, mainstream.

Blair Cottrell: And is that the end? Is that the end goal? Is that the end goal? Using the Indians as a means to an end, to mainstream, more racist viewpoints?

Joel Davis: Absolutely, yeah. What do you agree with the analysis? Like, do you think it’s a or do you have any counterpoints?

Blair Cottrell: The thing that came to mind was that when you said Tommy Robinson was diverting, I suppose, what you could describe as the collective instinct for self preservation, which is what racism is essentially, or what it should be anyway. Racism is always associated with something ugly, and in reality, it’s a completely natural thing. And it doesn’t have to be hateful or negative in its expression. That’s what I believe. But diverting that kind of healthy racism into religious disputes, that is to say, convincing people that race isn’t the problem, it’s just religion. We just have a problem with religions.

You have to remember that race has an influence over the religion. Like, if a large group, ethnic group, adopts a religion, they’re going to inject some of their own ethnic predispositions into the religious dogma as well. It’s the religion takes on a new form depending on the race that’s adopting it. I have a story about this, actually. I was in jail once with a Lebanese guy named Charlie. I won’t tell you his full name because I’m not a name dropper, but Charlie was a Christian, a Lebanese Christian.

However, he was very passionate about his Christianity. And I heard him one night, well, when I was in my cell, because he was in a couple of cells down from where I was, I heard him singing in Lebanese, loudly.

And I thought, maybe he wasn’t Christian. Maybe he was just saying that to throw me off, like, maybe he’s a Muslim, right? So I asked him the next morning, I said:

“What were you singing last night? Singing the Quran? I thought you were Christian.”

And he looked at me, almost offended, and he said:

“No, man, I was singing the Catholic chime, like Hail Mary or something, but I was singing it in Lebanese.”

And he added:

“Like, a melody to it as well.”

Which we don’t do. European Christians don’t do that. We don’t sing Hail Mary with a melody aggressively. It’s just like something that we summarize isn’t it, Joel? It’s like, how would you describe the way we express it? We kind of just memorize it and summarize it as a prayer. It’s not a song. And the Muslims, by Muslims, I mean Arabs. The Arabs get really into singing the entire Quran, actually, I think, is a song. The way it’s actually read a song sung by men, that’s the way it’s supposed to be expressed. And they love their singing. The men in Islam, even though Lebanese Charlie was a Christian, he was singing and aggressively singing Catholic prayers in his native language as though he was a Muslim. Right. Other Catholics, other Christians don’t do that.

So he had injected or fused his own ethnic disposition with the religion that he had adopted. So, realistically, all Islam is, if you look at it fundamentally, there’s some sort of points in which it deviates from fundamental Christianity somewhat, but all it really is is the Arabs having adopted the same Abrahamic faith and fused it with their own ethnic disposition, which means their own racial, natural way of behaving.

So I think it can’t be overstated, can’t be understated, can’t be overstated. I’m not sure if that’s the right way to put it. How much influence a race has over not just religion, but environment itself. Everything flows downstream from race and the natural character that the race facilitates. Possesses. Right? That’s what came to mind while you were explaining what you were explaining.

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, that’s definitely true.

And, I mean, the fact that the Indians have a religion that was originally invented by Aryans and has a lot of similarities with Germanic Paganism and Norse Paganism and so on, because originally the people groups that these traditions descend from are actually the same.

But then looking at basically what Hinduism has become and how distinguished it actually is, it is another demonstration of that it’s because the blood mixed down and it turned into something completely different, reflecting the blood of the current pajit.

And the same is true even in Europe. You could look at the Protestant Reformation, as you know, in a certain sense, an expression of Celto Germanic tendencies, the differences between Orthodox Christianity and western forms of Christianity, as well as representing a different kind of ethnic and racial kind of predisposition.

But, yeah, I think that’s clearly the case.

But I think also on this, while we’re on this subject, I think there’s also, like, another layer here to consider, which is when it comes to, let’s say, our propagandistic focus, a lot of the time, people say:

“Well, you shouldn’t be so negative. It shouldn’t be about hating other races or hating other groups. It’s about standing with your own group.”

And obviously, fundamentally, that’s what we are motivated by. We are motivated by defending our people, our way of life and the future for our children, our grandchildren and so on. That’s fundamentally what it’s about, that we love our own people, we love our own culture, and we want to see it perpetuate today. I was just thinking about this when I took a walk down to the shop and I live in a pretty White area now, and everyone was White and it was just very pleasant. You know, sometimes in some parts of Australia that are very non-White, when I’m walking down the street, I’m kind of got my eye on people because I don’t really trust all the other faces and it’s a very hostile environment and I feel very kind of dirty. I don’t really like being where I am and I just have, I just do my business and get the hell out of there.

Whereas I was actually just enjoying being out in public today just amongst, you know, other White Australians. And women were coming past smiling at me and dudes gave me the kind of nod as they came past a few times. And it was just pleasant and it seems very basic, but it’s an indication of you’re where you belong. You know, you feel comfortable in your own community, you feel safe in your own community. You feel like you are where you belong. And that sense of belonging has deeper implications than just a kind of chungus feeling or something. It indicates that you are actually safe and secure in general. Right, that you have.

And that’s why we’re ethno-nationalists. Like, it’s if who ran the country wasn’t important, then it wouldn’t matter, you know how many races come into the country because it wouldn’t be important. But it is important, right?

Because if your people aren’t running the country, that means other people are. And if other people are running the country, they’re going to run it for their interests, against your interests.

So you need to ensure not just that your people are running the country, by the way, that people loyal to your people are running the country, so that the state, the society and so on is built in such a way that it basically reflects your interests and the interests of your family and your community. So that sense of belonging pertains to this kind of basic human necessity. The man is a social animal. Man is on an island. You can’t express your total freedom as an individual. You can’t achieve your potential as a human being. You can’t flourish as a human being without a community and a society and a nation and a state that reflects your identity and reflects who you are. You just simply can’t. You’re basically an alien, an imposter in someone else’s community, someone else’s society, otherwise. And so many of your options are foreclosed.

But, yeah, this point is quite abstract. You know, and Hitler and Goebbels talked about this a lot that when you engage in propaganda, you don’t want to be too abstract, you don’t want to be too highfalutin. You immediately lose a lot of people. You want to have simple messaging that gives people a simple target to hate, that focuses negative emotional energy on that target, and galvanises people around that basically simple narrative. These are the people. This is the problem. And then present some kind of alternative or solution or good guy in the drama that is confronting the problem. And that’s the most effective propaganda.

But even still, you don’t even necessarily need that whole good guy narrative to have effective propaganda. You can just have a really good demonisation of a particular enemy, and you’re already halfway there.

And so, yeah, it might seem distasteful or unChristian or immoral to some people, but this is just simply how the human psyche works. You need to identify a target to hate, and you need to focus hate, revulsion, disgust on that target. That’s just how the human psyche works. There needs to be this threat that needs to be, …

Blair Cottrell: It’s being done to you. It’s what’s being done to us. They’re doing it to us. Think about it in the reverse, and look how effective it’s been. You can die happy, too. When you were referring to that sense of belonging and having a government, a leadership administration, which, you know, is administering the country for the purposes of keeping you relatively safe and ensuring that people get stronger and healthier and also protected from external threats, you can die happy if, you know, that’s happening. You can die happy. I could die happy. I said this to a friend the other day. I said I could die happy if I knew my family was relatively safe and my extended community. Other Australians were getting stronger and more beautiful generally. We were getting smarter, stronger, better. If I could see genetic improvements in my extended community, I could die happy. Couldn’t you?

You know, it’s kind of the ultimate meaning of life, when you think about it. I mean, none of us truly understand why we’re here or whether anything happens after death. We’re all not really sure. We only have theories. All we can say for sure is that people who die seldom report back. We don’t hear from them. So it’s reasonable to assume that whatever happens after death is not connected to this realm now.

And so we’re nothing in complete understanding. We don’t have a complete understanding of why we’re here.

But the most basic meaning that I can identify is improving the species. It’s a physical realm. It’s a physical plane. Everything is material here, except whatever it is that’s spurring us on and making us think the way we do. But I’ve said it before, and it’s actually paraphrasing Mein Kampf. Every defeat that your community suffers, our community suffers, every frustration, every failure. It’s only a setback in the grand scheme of things. So long as we protect our race, our racial. Our racial lineage needs to be protected so that we can, as they say, live to fight another day. Once your race is destroyed, you never get it back.

So that is the greatest meaning to life in this world, I think, is to protect and advance, develop, that is to say, improve our racial stock. If we lose it, we don’t get it back. We can lose a war. As long as the race stays, we’re fine. We can suffer all this mass immigration. As long as we protect ourselves as a race, we’ll be fine in the long run because we can fight back later. Like, we just have to protect the race while we’re under siege. Everything can be turned into a victory later. So long as the race is kept pure, as pure as possible. And, yeah, that’s where I find the most meaning in this realm. What do you think?

Joel Davis: Definitely! I mean, race is the form of life that you are. And if we go all the way back to the creation myth at the beginning of the Bible when God finished creating the world, he saw it and he said it was good. You know, nature is beautiful. The hand of God has created this incredible vast. You know, when you think about how big spaces. I know the flat Earthers are going to freak out at me, but you think about how vast spaces and the incredible images that you have of faraway galaxies and so on, it truly is incredible that existence is what it is.

I mean, just the fact that anything exists at all is a miracle when you really think about it. But the incredible majesty of its expanse and the intricacy as well. Just how complex everything is when you really break it down scientifically and go in the macro or the micro, it really is incredible!

And then when we look around, though, of all the known world, really, the human is still, in my opinion, the most interesting thing that exists that I’m aware of in the material realm. And then within the human, the Aryan race is the most interesting type of human that exists. I think that hands down, I mean, our story is the most interesting story. Our achievements are the most incredible achievements. We are the most interesting existentially, you know, from a romantic perspective and of course I’m biased, but nevertheless, that’s how I say we’re the most beautiful to look at. I think we’re the most. We have the most geniuses.

Blair Cottrell: Greatest, also greatest ability to imagine. We have the greatest ability to imagine which our most deadliest enemy, our most deadly enemy. They’ve worked that out and they’ve discovered how to use it against us. Because many of us are imagining a reality which is not real. The reality of human equality. You see, previously, our imagination has worked to our advantage because it’s produced great creativity and higher level of civilisation.

But now it’s being used against us, I think.

Joel Davis: Yeah, but nevertheless, the point is that the particular form of life that we are is something so precious. And you are kind of tasked. You’ve been given this form of life to embody it as a part of it. You’ve kind of been tasked with stewardship by God over the form of life that you are to, basically achieve its full potential. And that full potential you can realise somewhat in your own life, but it’s ultimately realised through the intergenerational development of the race, of the bloodline that you are participating in.

And that’s why people are so self sacrificial when it comes to their own children. Because there’s this innate sense within us that we are part of this grander process than just us as individuals. That we transcend the limitations of our individuality through the blood. And when you, a nation, is a community of blood, we all have the same ancestors. And if we stay together on a long enough timeline, our blood will probably mix again down the, down the ages.

And so we’re one big family kind of fighting in this kind of against nature in a certain sense, as a part of nature, to overcome its challenges and evolve and progress and develop. And it’s a beautiful thing. It really is. It’s an absolute enamours me. It gives me so much meaning in my life.

And so, to me, this is really what it’s all about. And the hatred that you feel to bring it back to the subject matter towards the pajeet, is what the pajeet represents, is when all that falls apart, when an Aryan people set up a civilisation and the caste system collapses and all their blood gets mixed with these inferior races, and you get this racial chaos and descent into depravity and lower stock, lower breeding, and you can see that what can come of the human race if you lose, because what it means to be Aryan, the word Aryan, it means honourable. It means noble when the blood loses its honour, when it loses its nobility, and becomes mixed down with the lower races, with the lower human types. And we see where culture goes. We see what becomes of a people in that state. And it’s disgusting! It’s literally disgusting! And that disgust that you feel, that revulsion, that’s what Nietzsche called the “pathos of distance”. That’s your inner nobility recognizing that’s a form of life I don’t want to become. I don’t want my children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, and so on becoming that is horrifying!

And so we need to maintain distance from that. We need to separate ourselves from that so that we don’t become that. Because if we get flooded with all of these jeets and they take over everything, and we get sectioned off and we’ll get down bred, and we’ll all be turned into pajeets on a long enough timeline, if the current political paradigm is allowed to perpetuate itself, that’s what it is. It’s global, basically. Global. India is the jewish, …

Blair Cottrell: Do you imagine if God came back? You imagine if God was just off doing something, or if you’re a Christian, the second coming of Christ Jesus comes back and the whole planet is just Indians, what would his reaction be? He’d be like:

“Oh, I was wrong. I was wrong. They can’t be saved. They can’t be saved. Burn it. Burn it all. Brimstone. Fire and brimstone. Let’s get rid of it.”

Joel Davis: It’s already horrifying enough to realise that the there’s more Indians in the world than White people already in total.

Blair Cottrell: We are a global minority. Whites are a global minority, and a pretty disadvantaged and oppressed one, considering that we’re the only ethnic group on the planet that’s not really morally or socially permitted to recognise itself as an ethnic group.

But you mentioned nature like that. We’re fighting against nature. I think you would agree that I see nature as, like, a necessary opponent. Like, it gives you the necessary trials in order to keep you strong genetically and physically in your own life. But, it’s a good opponent because it’s not actually trying to genocide you, like our other opponents. Nature’s not trying to kill off our entire race. Like, consciously. Nature’s more of an unconscious force of trials that tests you and makes sure you’re worthy of being here.

So that’s my preferred opponent. And I feel I have a strong connection and connection with an understanding of nature. I do really appreciate. The natural world can be quite, quite cruel. Nature can be the ultimate fascist. But I appreciate it for that reason.

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think in many ways, this is what the jew is almost like this manifestation of nature as a kind of test of the Aryan that we have to overcome. Like, in order to overcome.

Blair Cottrell: It’s a pretty rough test. It’s a high level test. That one’s like the final boss, maybe.

Joel Davis: But it’s like a woman is like, if a woman is of high quality, she will kind of test men to see can they pass her test to become worthy of breeding. Like, are they able to meet all of these criteria that makes her feel. Yeah, they do that.

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny, you conflate the existence of the jewish people with that, actually, because that’s what Hitler suggests in Mein Kampf, and he suggests that that’s why they’re considered the chosen people, because they were chosen by God to test everybody else.

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, definitely! There seemed to be a certain dynamic like, that going on, and jews are kind of like an anti-race. They’re not really a race because they’re mixed with so many other races. They don’t actually have any pure identity. They’re this hodgepodge.

Blair Cottrell: Is that true? Because there’s two separate types of jews. I know, Sephardic and Ashkenazi. And I do recognise ethnic traits in the Ashkenazi jews, which are the ones presiding primarily in Europe or previously have lived in Europe and hailed from European states, nations. Well, not nations, countries. They’re not of the European stock. Not necessarily, but they are kind of blended in, as you suggested. But recognise ethnic qualities as you probably can too. But what you’re suggesting is there’s no example of an actually pure jewish person. Is that what you mean?

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, it depends on, like, what theories you have about the origin of the hebrew peoples. I don’t really want to get into that, but the genetic fact or not in this stream, there’ll be a topic for another day, because that’s the whole show on itself. But the jew in his current manifestation the Ashkenazi jew, is literally half European, half semitic, or half Aryan half semitic. In, like, genetic modeling, you can just see it kind of plot between Levantine and southern European populations in particular. But and they look like that as well.

So, yeah, the jew is not a pure type.

And also, look at the history of Israel. It’s constantly getting conquered by all these surrounding empires, and it’s constantly changes in who’s running it, and brutal conquests by the Babylonians and the Assyrians.

And then the Greeks take it over, the Persians are running it at one point, the Romans are in charge. In the meantime, they mix with surrounding groups as well.

So, yeah, it’s the, …

Blair Cottrell: We’re much the same. We’re much the same. I mean, I’m not pure. I’m not a pure expression of an Aryan or northern European. I mean, I’m a result of intermixture to a certain extent. But within the European nations.

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s within the European nations. Yeah.

So that’s a bit. That’s a bit different. Like, within the like, there’s also gradations within the race. Like, we used to have more distinct castes, and now the casts have blended through interbreeding because caste specific breeding hasn’t occurred. And that’s one of the tasks that we will have once we basically regain political power, is to try and breed the caste back into distinction from one another through identifying who has more traits, like, what predominant caste traits people have, and then bringing them together.

And then eventually the blood will then repurify into, like, more specific castes.

But, yeah, we’re all kind of mixed in that respect. And the caste system itself, there were, like, different ancestral populations that are all European, that mixed in different ratios now to constitute the distinctions between different European populations.

But yeah, that’s at least within one race.

Whereas the jews are then mixed across, like, different racial groups, and the semitic people themselves are racially mixed people. They aren’t really a pure race either. That whole Middle Eastern to subcontinent area is just like a genetic quagmire of all these different groups mixed together.

Blair Cottrell: So what do you think, Joel, of the theory that we were the original jews? By we, I mean, sort of like light featured, light hair, blonde eyes. Sorry, blonde hair, blue eyes. People from northern Europe, we were the original jews, and our identity was stolen from us. And by a khazarian empire, I think they called it. Have you seen all that stuff? What do you think about that?

Joel Davis: I don’t think the Khazarian, the Khazarian theory I’m not well versed upon, but that I’m not so sure about.

But the idea that the original Israelites or Hebrews were Aryan and that over time they became mixed bread I think, has a lot going for it. That’s a very interesting theory, something that I’m still researching because it’s very difficult as well. When you go back before the if you go back too many you go back to like 3,000 years ago, it’s hard to find evidence for a lot of things so you’re really trying to piece together fragments.

And obviously this is politically disputed as well. And the jews or the modern day state of Israel wants to perpetuate a certain narrative and myth about history and they’re actually in control of a lot of the archaeological sites and so on.

So it’s very complicated. But the long and short of it is, yeah, I do think that there is some evidence that the original Hebrews had more White traits, you know, some reports, not necessarily blonde, but like ginger hair and lighter eyes and so on, obviously.

And then they were being conquered by Babylonians and mixed with the Edomites after the Maccabean revolt and so on and so then they could have gained traits from the surrounding semitic peoples over time and became a kind of hybrid semitic race over time.

Blair Cottrell: But I wonder if there’s any value in learning Hebrew. Would you learn Hebrew?

Joel Davis: I mean, I got high priority.

Blair Cottrell: Is it even possible? Would they have they got like the actual Hebrew as a protected language? Perhaps certain people.

And then the one that they allow other people to learn is like a bastardized.

Joel Davis: Yeah. The modern day so-called Hebrew language that they have in modern day Israel is actually Aramaic, which is a completely different language and has a completely different script.

If you look at the records of like the ancient original Hebrew language prior to in the oldest kind of records that we have, it actually looks a lot like Greek or some European script. I think obviously it derives from the Phoenician language, so that’s probably why.

But yeah, that’s quite interesting, all of that stuff.

But it’s a bit of a deviation, I feel like going down that trajectory. I mean, unless you really want to.

Blair Cottrell: That’s all right, we can keep it local. I’ve just personally been thinking about learning another language. Not necessarily because I want to know the language. As much as I want to enhance my capacity for remembering and also expressing myself, I think the more words you know, too, that cover a broad range of different meanings. And that’s especially possible if you’re going to know multiple languages. You can think better, you can process information better, because you have more words to understand things, to use to understand things.

And I think I’ve really wasted time by not learning another language up until this point in my life. I’m just not really sure how to go about it. I know that there’s these phone applications now, and you can spend, 200 minutes a day doing something and you get points and all that sort of stuff, but I’m not really sure if that would effectively teach me a language. I could give it a go. I just don’t want to dump much time into something that’s not going to produce the result that I want. And the result that I want, as I explained, is I want to know more words in another language as well, preferably a language which has more words than English words, and maybe even a language that with a different Alphabet to English.

So I don’t get confused. I’d like to learn an entirely new, entirely new Alphabet, which was why I was considering Hebrew. Greek might also be interesting. I think Greek would be particularly challenging, actually.

But, yeah, I’m fascinated by language.

Joel Davis: I would say that if you want to learn another language, you would want to pick a language where there’s something written in that language that you want to read in the original.

And so then you have an actual task that’s motivating you and contextualizing the process rather than learning it just for the sake of it.

So if you wanted to learn ancient Greek because you wanted to read Plato in the original Greek and the Septuagint or something, you wanted to read, like, texts written in ancient Greek and understand, be able to translate them into English yourself for your own edification or for me, when I was reading a lot of German and French philosophy, I started picking up a lot of German and French terms.

And I thought about it would be really good to learn German completely properly and then read German philosophy in the original German. That would be really interesting.

But then also you would want, if you want to learn how to speak it well, you’d want people in your life that speak that language to talk to you.

Blair Cottrell: Otherwise, how do you know, exactly, like, how do you know, that you’re pronouncing a word correctly? I mean, I even do that in English. I pronounce words incorrectly all the time because I’ve been reading and learning them. But people don’t use those words in conversation in present day society, and so I’m mispronouncing English all the time.

Of course I’m going to do that to a much greater extent if I’m learning a new language. And I don’t know anyone who’s also speaking that language.

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’d be a lot easier as well, if you lived in a country where everyone speaks that language. Like, you’d be able to learn German a lot faster if you lived in Germany than if you’re in Australia.

Blair Cottrell: So you have to. You have to. It’s like if you have to your friend just got shot in the leg, and you’ve got to get in a manual car and drive him to a hospital, but you don’t know how to drive manual. You kind of have to drive manual. And so by the time you get to the hospital, you learnt how to drive manual. It’s kind of like that living in a foreign country where you have to learn a language in order to gain access to basic goods and services. Right.

And on the subject of goods and services, I’m really exhausted by the incompetence of the basic person.

I mean, I won’t go through all the details, but I’m talking about hairdressers, fast food restaurants, you know, supermarket employees. Has anyone else noticed how bad everyone is at just performing basic jobs, resulting in exchange of services like the Internet and social media, whatever it is, has just destroyed people’s communicative capacity? People are terrible at their jobs. They’re terrible at speaking to you and I had a really bad day today. Well, the first half of the day, as a result of just communication breakdowns and me literally having to explain to people in certain industries how to do their job so they could produce a certain service or product? For me, it’s just exhausting. Mandy, I feel like.

I don’t know if you feel the same, Joel. Do you feel like you produce your own energy, but almost no one else in society does? They just take it from you. It’s like some people take energy, and some people produce energy, and I feel like I don’t take and I don’t want to take anyone else’s energy because I’m producing plenty of my own. But I get really tired. I get exhausted when I’m out of my home for too long because people are just draining me. It’s just general incompetence. I suppose that’s my complaint with people in society. Is anyone else noticing this? Let me know in the comments, because I need to feel like someone’s backing me up here.

Joel Davis: No, definitely! I experienced the same thing. I think it’s partly due to the fact that mass immigration, White people just have higher standards.

And even though a lot of the time you deal with White people in these jobs, they’re working in an environment that has now become mixed.

And as a result of that, like, standards in general drop and competency in general with training people and across the board, everything just kind of falls. The less White people. As soon as you like. Yeah. Dilute a workplace with non-Whites.

Also, I think for low income roles, it’s like, I think people struggle to really get motivated for $25 an hour or something to really care, because that’s worth nothing these days. Like, you really, you’re barely able to survive if you’re working a minimum wage job, so why would you be putting your heart and soul into its not a very dignified existence.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s fair enough, though.

But I’m talking about hairdressers. I went into a barber because I’ve been trimming my facial hair at home. But the trimmers, whatever they’re called, that I’ve been using, they’ve been giving me rash. So I thought I’ll throw them out and get some new ones later, but for now, I’ll just go to a barber and get my beard trims. And it was such an ordeal, man. It was such a pain in the fucking arse just to get my beard trimmed. I had to wait almost an hour.

And then when I finally did get into one of the barbers chairs, I just got some woman hairdresser working in a barbershop who clearly had never actually cut facial hair before and wasn’t confident to do it, but gave it a crack nonetheless. And I won’t go into all the details, but it was just, it was very frustrating. And I’m thinking to myself, and I tried, like, two different barbers as well, but at the other one, there was only one person working, and there was just too many people waiting there. I would have been there for over an hour.

And this is the first thing in the morning, too. Like, before I started work, I thought, you know, I’ll get into a barber quickly, it won’t take too long, and then I’ll be able to go to work. But I go to the local barber, I suppose this is population density problem or an illustration of that? It’s just about to open. Two minutes away from opening and there’s like almost ten people waiting at the front. They’ve all got the same idea I’ve got. I suppose they just want to get in there before their day starts. But it never used to be this way. It never used to be this way. Not even five years ago.

Everyone’s running away, Joel, because all these people I’m talking about, they’re White people waiting at the front of the barber in my area. They’re White. All the people that are sort of clustering up in this suburb, majority of them are White, but they didn’t live here before. They used to live in other areas which are now either unaffordable or completely inundated with migrants.

And so they’ve run down to the southeast where I live because it’s one of the last livable areas that’s still relatively Australian.

And I’m really feeling it. I got to say, I’m really feeling the absurd population density, the sudden increase. It’s kind of hit industry too.

I saw an interesting little propaganda video that I shared on my Telegram. You can find it on my main Telegram channel.

And I’m really glad I found the channel that it’s from, the channel I shared it from because it’s got all of these historical propaganda posters from various different wars and episodes in countries around the world throughout history.

And I’m really interested not just in language but in propaganda depictions, old and new. And in this particular video, I think it was produced by the National Party in New Zealand in 1975, if I remember my details correctly.

Basically New Zealand at that point was facing the same problems Melbourne is now. Actually, it’s much worse because the numbers are much worse in our situation. Numbers of immigrants. But the amount of immigrants coming in, there’s too many at once. There’s not enough housing.

And so the price of housing has soared to egregiously high levels. And it goes through the consequences of what happens after that. There ends up not being enough schools or hospitals as well. And pretty soon there’s not enough jobs. Then crime goes through the roof, there’s hostility between the people, there’s discontent and you basically end up with a crisis. And the way that the New Zealand government solved that crisis was moving everyone into the city in cheap little apartments. And now 90% of New Zealand’s population, or even more than that, I think it’s like 93% lives in the city in the major city in the northern part, I think that is.

And so I suppose down here in Melbourne they might try to do the same thing.

But I think they’ll probably set up more little satellite cities around Melbourne. They may try to make one out of Frankston. I know that basically every traditional residential block in the southeast where I live is now subdivided. If it can be subdivided, it will be subdivided and units will be built on it. So what previously was one family home is now between three and five small one bedroom or two bedroom apartments, like, very tight built close together. And I suppose that’s the solution that the state’s going to come up with in our case.

But, yeah, I’m actually at a loss to remember the point that I began with but if you want to watch that video, watch that video on my Telegram and follow the channel, too, I’ll go to it now. The channel is on Telegram. Propaganda posters. It’s literally called propaganda posters. He’s got a Reddit channel as well.

But, yeah, I’m really glad I found it.

Joel Davis: Yeah. So a couple other stories I guess we should probably cover while we’re on here, because we’re supposed to cover the news. The refugee encampment that we counter-protested a couple weeks ago. Immigrant protesters clash with police in Melbourne as they block street, demanding permanent visas. So it’s funny. They’re still there. They’re still messing around, and now they’re basically unruly fighting with police. And this comes after a somewhat humourous story, in my opinion, of one of these pajeets, or I say jeet, but he’s a Tamil, meaning he’s from Sri Lanka. He self immolated. He burnt himself alive in Noble Park at the skate park or something because he couldn’t get a visa. Two weeks of protesting didn’t get his visa, and so he burnt himself alive. And they’re making this big deal out of it. Oh, this poor man, he was killed by the racist Labor government because they won’t give him a visa. I mean, and some people made the humourous remarks of you’d rather burn yourself alive than go back to your own country and so on. It’s quite humourous.

But, yeah, the that happened.

So that’s kind of energized all the communists and shit! And now they’re clashing with police.

So anyway, basically, they all just need to be deported. I mean, as we were correct in saying, like, that’s the easy result or the easy kind of response to this problem. These people are showing up. They’re saying Australia doesn’t exist, that the country was stolen. They don’t respect Australia as having any legitimacy and they feel entitled to live here. And now they’re disrespecting law enforcement.

And of course they still have the female cops down there that they had.

So the female cops don’t do anything. Imagine if we were out in front of a government department counter-protesting. They’d send down the riot squad, and if we didn’t leave within an hour, that’s like pepper spraying us and trying to like, get the riot shields out and start like bashing us or something. But they tolerate these people blocking off street, a street for two weeks, just camping on the side of the road. I think that’s actually legal to just decide, I’m just going to start living on the side of this road here because I feel like it.

Nevertheless, that’s what they’re doing. And, yeah, it’s just kind of its just kind of quite funny.

And I think bad optics. I don’t think they’re really getting anywhere with what they’re achieving or what they’re trying to achieve. All they’ve done is just piss a bunch of people off in the country, in the community, giving us a good opportunity to inject our propaganda. Made themselves look unsympathetic and more of the same. What do you think? Do you think it’s a bad look for him punching on with the cops?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it always is for the purposes of mass appeal.

There’s no reason for things to get to that extent as well, I mean, if you’re punching on with police officers, you have either failed to consider all of your other options or all of your other options have failed, which is unlikely. There’s plenty of other options and opportunities for getting the result that you want at a public protest without fighting with police. I know sometimes the police advance on you and you’ve got to do what you got to do to protect yourself, but it’s always a bad look.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t think the police are attacking these guys either. The police have been very giving them a very soft touch. I think that they’re just chimping out, basically. Um, just shows. Goes to show even more their entitlement.

Blair Cottrell: Is there any video, is there any video footage of the incident or.

Joel Davis: Um. I think there is, but I already got out of it. I just want to kind of keep going on this because this story got. Adds into it. This is from Canada. So in Canada, they’ve got protests as well, but they’re not even claiming to be refugees. They’re literally student on student visas. Because they got bad grades, apparently. Like, it’s because of racism, not because they didn’t pass the tests.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

Joel Davis: And they’re demanding permanent residency and they’re claiming that Canada is stolen land. And that, again, same thing they do here. They claim that Canada is in a legitimate country, and therefore they, Indians should be entitled to be given university degrees despite failing the exams, and they should be able to live there as long as they want.

Blair Cottrell: But if Canada, if it’s not a legitimate country, then why do they want to be legitimately recognised and naturalised by that country? It’s like fucking. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. So it’s stolen land and it’s not a real nation, but you want to be considered a part of and citizen of that nation at the same time. And if they say no, they’re racist. The fuck are they talking about?

Joel Davis: Students? Like, if you’re there as a student, so then you finish a degree to go home. Like, they expect that they just get to stay forever. But that’s not the terms of the visa. They weren’t invited in to live there forever. They were brought in. They allowed them in to go to university.

But you can see that they don’t actually. They’re not even passing the exams. They don’t even really care about the education. They’re just using that as a way to immigrate. And I saw that actually, the Left-wing government in Canada, because they have an election coming up, they just vowed to cancel 70,000 student visas or something and deport a bunch of Indians. And that’s obviously like a ploy to try and win votes for the next election.

So that’s interesting to see that the public opinion has shifted. So much of the Left-wing government is doing that, and the Left-wing government here seems to be trying to present itself in that way, too. They’re claiming that they’re going to clean up the student visa program, but if you look at the fine details, they’re not. It’s just like they’re nothing. They’ve done this a few times now where they’ve claimed to be reducing immigration or they’ve claimed to be reducing student visas, but then you look at the actual details of the policy, and it’s actually a nothing. It’s just like a way of changing the presentation of the numbers. So it seems like that’s what they’re doing, but actually the numbers stay the same. So there seems to be a recognition in both here and in Canada that this is wildly unpopular, but the people recognise that it’s contributing to the housing crisis and people are just fucking sick of pajeets. Ultimately, they might not say that explicitly, although increasingly they are more.

So it’s interesting to see that, yeah, that’s the kind of where the political winds are right now.

And there’s also this article that I wanted to discuss. I shared this. Let me pull this up. Australians increasingly care more about reducing immigration and less about climate change than two years ago. I definitely feel this, like no one is really talking about climate change anymore. Thank God, because it’s really a forced issue. I’m pretty sceptical that climate change is like, the carbon emissions are really that significant in the grand scheme of things. And it does seem contrived for political purposes.

Blair Cottrell: I had an old lady just approach me at a bus stop last time, or not the last time, probably about six months ago when I was up in Gold Coast. Maybe it wasn’t that long ago, I can’t remember, but some old lady just walked up to me and started talking to me about climate change and our responsibility in reversing it. And I asked her, where did you read this? Where’d you get this information from? And she said:

“Oh, the Guardian.”

And I said:

“Right.”

So, yeah, bless her heart. So some people are still spelled by it, but I definitely feel that’s not as popular as it once was.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, obviously a lot of people, it’s probably like 50-50. Like 50% of people maybe believe in it, 50% don’t, something like that. But whether you believe in it or don’t believe in it, reducing immigration would be good for climate change if you do believe in it, right? Like, if climate change is real, then you would want to stop importing people into the first world from the third world because they’ve done studies on this. When someone moves from the third world into the first world, their carbon emissions go up four or five times per capita. So every jeet that comes in is you’re quintupling their carbon footprint.

So if you really care about climate change, you should want to deport all the jeets back to India and really like the most egregious countries in the world for building new coal plants and increasing their carbon emissions and so on, is actually India and China and other non-Western countries. Western countries are the only ones doing anything about it. White people seem to be the only people that actually care about climate change.

So if you really think that this is real, the solution would be sending all the non-Whites back and then trying to de industrialise non-White countries as much as possible to reduce their carbon footprint.

So we should stop giving foreign aid to Africa, try and reduce the African population. We should try and like, put sanctions on India until they dismantle all of their coal power industry, basically, and power stations and shit like that!

And so if you really believe in climate change, I’ve got solutions, but they’re racist.

Blair Cottrell: But you’re being. Fixing it, you’re being too sensible. All we have to focus on is fighting racism and ending White supremacy. It all comes down to that. Joel Davis.

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s what’s funny. Like, I’m quite happy to just pretend climate change is real if you want, if you really want to solve it, because it’d be quite simple. Like, we could just, in Australia, we could just build a bunch of nuclear power stations. There’s no carbon emissions. We have more. The second largest amount of uranium deposits in the world would be carbon neutral in. You know, once we build them, we’ll be sweet.

But in the meantime, we should just send all the non-Whites back and do what I said. And I don’t think that a place like India or Pakistan would actually, or some of these countries would actually be able to recover from global sanctions and being forced to get off coal power. And we should stop selling alcohol to them, by the way, which we do. So we could really just shit can their economies. It would be best for the global environment if we just destroyed the non-developed economy, allowing more economies to develop because more development means more electricity gets used, more demand for electricity and more environmental degradation. So honestly the best thing for the environment is global eugenics, basically. It really is.

But anyway, Australians care less about climate change, which I think is good because it’s kind of a yeah, it’s an issue that is kind of basically, oh, we need to build more wind farms and all of this kind of nonsense! Like, they don’t want to actually solve the problem, which is if it really does exist, it would be implementing nuclear power. They come up with like some bullshit solution that they know will piss off the boomers. So then the boomers then have a good reason to vote for the Liberal Party, and the Liberal Party can, instead of talking about immigration or anything of actual consequence. And the same goes for all the other Right-wing parties. They can go on about climate change and they can have this like, stupid argument between the Left-wingers and the Right-wingers about climate change.

And no one’s talking about anything actually important but the fact that Australia is not fucking Australia anymore because it’s full of brown people and they’re degrading and debasing the White founding stock of this country. And look at the crime rate of all these Africans and Pacific islanders and Middle Easterners that they’re bringing in. What are we going to do about that? So I’m glad that it’s off the menu so that we can talk about real issues and immigration surging in people’s concerns.

So, yeah, basically people still care about things like healthcare and the economy and shit like that! But the key issue that is rising in concern is immigration. It’s gone up by 17.6% in two years. People that report, they’re concerned about it, about immigration.

So that shows that our kind of politics is in the ascendancy. Our concerns are in the ascendancy.

And obviously that’s a good thing.

Blair Cottrell: Absolutely! It’s only a matter of time, isn’t it? How long can you ignore, like, a million Indians moving in around you? You can’t really ignore it. It was always going to come to the forefront of a major issue, immigration, that is. And I suppose if the Labor Party have any sense or semblance of sense left, then they’ll probably try to incorporate some promise to stop or lower immigration.

But as history shows in Australian politics, not only do Australian politicians not keep their promises, they often do the opposite of what they promise they’re going to do.

So the Labor Party bureaucrats, they don’t even need to actually hold to their promise. If they say they’re going to reduce immigration, they just have to say they’re going to do it and then not do it. Kind of like the Liberal Party, they do that as well. It’s almost like they’re the same entity, isn’t it? It’s almost like there’s not a lot of difference between them. Like a false choice.

I mean, I’m being a little bit conspiratorial now. Wouldn’t want to get my bank account closed for hate speech.

But, yeah, it’s almost like the same people are responsible for lobbying the Liberal and Labour parties. Imagine that. That’d be crazy!

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, that’s the case. The property lobby, the business lobby, the various industries, the finance lobby, these are the main contributors to both parties. And they all want more immigration. That’s the consensus. And Bob Hawke, actually, former prime minister from the eighties, is quoted basically admitting that there is a conspiracy between the coalition and the Labor Party to avoid debating immigration. Uh, because they know immigration is so unpopular with the people that if it’s turned into a debate, it will force both sides to make concessions and cut immigration in order to maintain popularity. There’d be like a game theory runoff where if one side attacked the other’s immigration policy, they’d have to respond to regain popularity and they’d end up both being forced to start having a One Nation style immigration policy, which would actually be more popular.

People don’t like immigration. We’ve gone through the polls on the show many times. The vast majority of Australians don’t think we need any more people. They don’t think that we need to bring in immigrants. They don’t want. They want immigration cut.

So, yeah, immigration is not popular and they know it, so that’s why they don’t debate it. Or they’ll make the debate about something like illegal immigrants, like boat people, or they’ll make it about these little side issues sometimes, but that’s the full extent of it. The other, one other big story this week was that Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, he got sucked. He got, like sucked into going to France to meet some Instagram ho.

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know if that’s the truth!

Joel Davis: That is them out together?

Blair Cottrell: No, no, I don’t know if that’s. There’s different rumours. Like, the first rumour that spread about was that he’d been spending at least a few weeks with a girl from Instagram. And that girl had been posting selfies with him, including geolocations to her Instagram channel. And they’d been traveling to various different exotic locations. Because Durov does not want for money. He seems to have made a bit of money through Telegram and usually businessmen, they have more than one venture going on.

So I’m not really sure what he’s into exactly. But he makes money.

So apparently the girl, the Instagram girl, was with him when he flew to France. So she was in his jethe. She went there with him. And it’s speculated upon that perhaps either due to her naivety, her stupidity, or maybe deliberate mal intense, she was responsible for him being arrested by French authorities because they were either tracking him through watching her movements or she was working for them directly. I think the first situation is more likely.

But then there’s another rumour that Macron invited him to France. France, which I don’t know. I haven’t seen much weight behind that one. But apparently it’s true to Macron’s style, apparently Macron invited him for some sort of I don’t know, how would you describe it? Some sort of assembly. They were going to have dinner or something, and there was going to be other people there.

But it was a ruse just to get him to come to France so he could be arrested. It’s common knowledge apparently, that the French government, French authorities, they’ve wanted to arrest Durov for a while. While they don’t like Telegram there, and Durov is, I think, a dual citizen, French citizen and also Russian. Is that right, Joel? Is he a Russian citizen? I think he is, I think, so long as he remained in Russia and his Telegram servers remained in Russia, there was nothing the French government could do about it. There’s nothing any European nation state could do about it.

Joel Davis: Based in Russia. I think he bases it in more neutral countries, maybe.

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. Yeah, see, that goes to show I don’t actually know. All I know is those are the main two rumours.

The first one being the Instagram girl responsible for his arrest.

And the second being he was responding to an invitation by someone in Macron’s office directly to come to France.

So either way, it was a mistake for him to go to France. And he’s learning that now. He was just bailed about in the last, 24 hours, and it’s 5 million Euro, his bail bond, which is equivalent to about five and a half million US dollars, according to news sources. It’s a lot of money. It’s a lot of money.

And I’ve always thought credit bail was funny. It’s kind of ridiculous in a way that you can buy your way out of custody. Yeah, well, you can buy your way out of custody. You’re in custody and they don’t want to let you go because if they let you go, you might skip the country and not come back.

And then their whole criminal case is just defunct. It’s gone.

But if you pay them enough money, they’ll be willing to take that risk. Because then, even if you do skip the country, well, at least they got your money. So they don’t care. So everything just comes down to money with the judiciary and justice system.

At the end of the day, I know that credit bail is not so popular in Australia. It’s not something you regularly hear about. It’s something that you have to specifically requests. If they’ve already denied your bail. You usually just get bail if you’re on criminal charges without having to put up any money. But it depends on who you are, obviously, if you’re Durov and you’ve got money, they’re going to try to get money out of you. The French government and the judiciary, they want some of that money. And it’s probably not in Durov’s interest to try to leave France immediately. I believe the government would expect that he would try to do that now.

And so he probably wants to sit tight for at least a few months until the heat dies down. He’s got to check in at a police station twice per week and remain in France. Apparently, those are his bail conditions. Checking in at a police station basically means you just have to go and sign a document saying you’re still in the country and you haven’t run away as part of a bail condition. It was imposed on me once when I was young. You have to go within a certain time, too. If you’re late, they aren’t very lenient. If you’re late to a sign in date, then they don’t like that they can breach your bail for one mishap.

So you’ve got to be pretty switched on with your appointments and schedule.

But, yeah, it’s pretty alarming, though, that the moment he landed in France, he was intercepted by what I assume is a special operations group because it would have required specific intelligence of a certain type coming from a specific branch of special government to know that he was going to land in a private jet at a certain time, at a certain location. Right. That requires Intel and special operations authority group, probably mercenaries, hired mercenaries. They arrest him, they take him to jail. And the French government says it’s basically because you’re not censoring who we tell you to censor. It’s because you’re not playing ball with us. You’re providing a very popular social media platform and you’re not abiding by our censorship directives.

So you’re in jail now being charged with all these trumped up offences about allowing or being complicit in criminal activity. I’m sure criminal activity happens on all social media, right, Joe? Like, I’m sure drug dealers meet up.

Joel Davis: As a result of talking on Facebook, on Instagram.

Blair Cottrell: Exactly! Exactly!

Joel Davis: Investigators. And then publicized it, and then it just got deleted. And no one got criminally investigated, and nothing happened to Instagram, but they were operating freely until someone, you know, publicized it in the media. Hey, there’s this pedo ring and people. You could blame Instagram for that, or you could just say:

“Well, you know, moderation is difficult.”

They managed to moderate racism. It seems like all their moderation is so focused on racism, they got no moderation left over to focus on paedophilia on a site like Instagram.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but on Telegram about that. But look, it’s a big, …

Joel Davis: It’s pretty free.

And it’s like, yeah, if you allow freedom, you know, freedom is It can be used for good or evil. You know, that’s. And that’s part of it.

I personally think I would much rather have free Internet where people can do nefarious activity and the authorities are responsible for prosecuting that particular nefarious activity. Because the thing is, so they get Instagram to stop people from engaging in nefarious activity. Well, they’re not going to just stop engaging in it entirely. They’re just going to find some other way to do it.

But really what it’s about, the French government don’t actually care about paedophilia. They don’t actually care about whatever other issues they’re trying to put on him. They care about stopping racism, they care about stopping anti-semitism. That’s what it’s really about. They don’t want any social media to be free. And that’s just very clear and obvious because Telegram, until Twitter recently, and I guess now, like Rumble, Telegram at one point was the last bastion of free speech in all social media that anyone actually uses.

Like, there are that smaller social media, like Gab and so on, and respect to Andrew Torber, who runs Gab, but no one’s really on GAB. You know, no one’s really on these smaller sites. But Telegram is one of the most downloaded apps in the world. In Europe, it’s more popular than in Australia or America. People use it like WhatsApp.

As their primary messaging a to communicate with their friends. And it’s still pretty popular in Australia and America, but it’s super popular in Europe. Everyone has Telegram. In Europe, everyone uses it. So for it to be free and for people like me and you. Yeah, I know that we’ve been, I’ve been a banned recently and Tom has been a banned. But I don’t really blame Telegram for that because that is just, I’m only banning Telegram that you download from Google Play or you download from the Apple App Store, and that’s a condition for the a being available. So that’s really, that’s really Apple and Google imposing that, not Telegram.

Whereas if you download Telegram directly from the Telegram website onto your Android phone, but you can do it on your Android phone, then there’s no a bands.

Blair Cottrell: You can make you wonder, Joel, I was thinking this. It doesn’t, it doesn’t make you wonder because Durov was not following censorship directives of France or European governments. This is how he’s treated. But no one working for Apple or Google, no major shareholders or CEO’s experienced the same treatment. So could you imagine the kind of data, the personal information of users that is just regularly and routinely handed over to governments by Apple and Google? Like, governments probably just have full access to whatever they want. They’re probably looking up your nostrils half the time if they want to be, you know.

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Like, I know, as you probably know all about my private life. That’s why I don’t want to say say too much more, actually. I’ll keep that to myself. Yeah, a zero know all about my private life. And it sucks to, but just part of the territory. They’re all about your private life. They probably know more about us than we know about our fucking selves at this point.

Blair Cottrell: I wouldn’t go that far. I know myself pretty well. Well, I think I do.

Joel Davis: But they have wonder who ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] have a sign to analyze, like, our private life. It must be kind of sad because if you did actually analyze, probably have just kind of normal guys with we’re like, we’re like humans. We’re real human beings. And it’d be hard not to be a little bit sympathetic, like, you know.

Blair Cottrell: It doesn’t matter though, because it would go down a bureaucratic sort of pathway, so it doesn’t actually matter. It goes through so many hands that by the time a decision is made, there’s no humanity left. But they’d probably just have psychologists that sort of interpret for them, and then it moves on to someone else who does a different interpretation and it paints a picture. Identify weak points. I don’t know, man. Like, it’s an interesting thing to observe or to discuss, but I’m not exactly sure how it would work.

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s pretty disgusting, though. I mean, but it is what it is. But I don’t have any control over it. I just find it disgusting and repulsive.

But anyway.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it is. Well, it’s disgusting! You can be morally against it, but finding out everything you possibly can about what you consider to be a potential threat to you or an enemy in warfare, it’s actually just part of the game. You want as much information as you possibly can on an enemy so, you know how to approach them, when to approach them. If to approach them and, just methods of attack, etc. Etc. Like, if you know anything about warfare, gathering as much information as possible on an enemy target is just essential.

So I don’t know. Obviously, technology is being used to that end by certain governments and government departments against dissidents right now. Because dissidents like the government, the government is at war with dissidents when you think about it.

Joel Davis: But in a way, I think it might potentially be a good thing because if there’s anyone at the Australian intelligence services who isn’t like a total ideological retard, and they would know the truth about us and they analyzed us extensively, they would realise that we’re actually patriots, that we’re actually noble figures with morals, that we are not reckless, we’re not terrorists, we’re not bad guys.

Blair Cottrell: That.

Joel Davis: We actually aren’t a threat.

Whereas when they’re analyzing all the other freaks that they’re looking into, they would find the complete opposite when they’re looking into the Islamic terrorists or whatever, when they’re analyzing all these operations by the Indians and the Chinese and so on to infiltrate our government that they’ve uncovered.

And then they would analyze us and they’d see us talking about all the threats that they identify, like, yes, we shouldn’t have Indians. We shouldn’t have Chinese. Look, what is the Chinese government doing? Look at what the jews are doing. Look at what the Muslims are doing. And Asia would be like, these guys are right. Like, this is, everything else that we are researching is literally the stuff that they’re concerned about. That’s kind of crazy!

So maybe ASIO would realise, like, wait a second, why are we looking at these guys so hard?

And I actually might explain why when they had Mike Burgess, the director of ASIO, before the Senate inquiry recently, and they were asking him questions about us, he did, honestly, he didn’t seem too bothered by us, didn’t want to go into too extensive detail. Obviously, he has to put on a show for the jews and the Leftist. Like, he’s very concerned about Right-wing terrorism and they’re looking into it and they’ve got their eye on us. But he would know that we’re not going to commit terrorist acts. He would know that we’re actually patriotic forces. We just want to participate in liberal democracy like everybody else, and that we’re actually quite reasonable and rational. And the threats that we’ve identified are actually reasonable and rational threats.

And ultimately, these people are getting upset because we’re exercising our free, our rights to freedom of political expression and organising, which every Australian is supposed to be entitled to have under liberal democracy. And he probably is kind of sick and tired of these communists and jews constantly pressuring him to waste his time and energy making reports about us going to the park and kickboxing each other or messaging each other funny racist memes or something, and wants to actually focus upon real counter espionage against Australia’s actual enemies.

So he kind of had that attitude of like why am I here? Almost like, this is fucking retarded! But going through the motions. I thought that was interesting and that sent an inquiry. It was like, they were making a lot of really, like, basic errors in their analysis of us. It was like a bunch of low IQ retards that put in barely any effort, were the ones that were researching us and put together the reports. They were getting really, like, basic details wrong in their discussion of us. And it was a lot of waffle. I listened to a substantial portion of it, so I found that interesting as well. It’s like they don’t actually have very competent public facing researchers that are writing these reports about us.

I feel like ASIO would probably have a more competent team behind the scenes that’s creating their internal reporting. And I would imagine their internal reporting is vastly different than the stuff that gets reported in the media, which is probably why, even though counter-terrorism, which is a different part of the government than ASIO, counter-terrorism seems very focused upon trying to disrupt our organising and slow our growth and spook people out from associating. Why ASIO has said “we’re awful, but lawful” and haven’t prescribed us as a terrorist organisation and a kind of letting us cook. To a certain extent, I would anticipate that’s probably why. Because they actually have the information and maybe the competency to realise that the way that we’re presented in the media is a load of bullshit!

Blair Cottrell: Well, they’re bound by certain. These agencies are bound by certain laws and procedures as well. They can’t just do whatever they want. If you’re not actually advocating for violence, you’re not engaging in or planning violence. There’s really not a lot they can do they can just kind of observe and make reports, because I think there’s too much energy is spent on all of these little ideological groups. When I think government agencies, intelligence agencies, I think would be their resources would be better used focusing on state based threats, like, meaning foreign interference is actually the result of another country trying to interfere with ours. You know, that’s where I think, huh?

Joel Davis: That’s what it’s supposed to be for. That’s why it was created.

Blair Cottrell: Exactly! But we’ve, ever since the War on Terror and the idea of, like little terrorist cells and ideological extremism kind of sprung from that. And now our intelligence departments are busy chasing ghosts. All these little, like so-called ideological extremist, homegrown terrorists, as they call you know, radicals and so forth, you know, which are really just young kids who are just shitposting on the Internet. And all these resources get wasted on that while real state based threats are active in the country at high levels of government and institutions.

So, like I said:

“I think intelligence.”

Joel Davis: We would like to be running the government. We would like to be in political power, and that would be our ultimate aspiration. But we’re proud Australians. Like, we just want to serve our nation and its interests. That’s completely different than a foreign actor, foreign state actor on behalf of the Chinese government or even the Indian government trying to steal, you know, state secrets or compromised politicians or what Israel does, where Israel is a foreign state and it basically owns elements of our media, elements of our political establishment, or the threat of Islamic terrorism, where these are outsiders with a completely hostile culture, hostile religion, hostile everything who want to commit acts of terrorism to destabilise and ultimately destroy Australian society. And just cause. Just hurt people for the sake of it and this kind of thing.

So we’re completely different. They shouldn’t even have a file on us. Like, according to the reason why they exist, obviously, they are kind of compelled to by the current political paradigm.

But anyway, I think on some level, some of them would probably realise that is all I’m saying.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but the problem with that is just to wrap that subject up, I would assume it happens in intelligence departments because it happens with police and prison officers. They shuffle around stuff. So they’ll put you on something and then they’ll take you off it and put you somewhere else so you don’t develop too much familiarity or sympathy for anyone you’re dealing with in that area.

Joel Davis: Oh, you know, so, you know, reported on this that the people that they put on to research Right-wing extremism, which would mean literally us and our friends, that they have to cycle them out every six or eight months or something and then put them through a de-radicalisation program.

Because if you spend six to eight months watching us. And you’re not like, a fat communist, or a jew or something. If you’re just a normal White person and you’re watching us, you’d be like:

“Fuck! These cunts actually make sense!”

Because we’re the ones that actually do make the most sense in all of Australian politics.

And so they have to put them through, like, a brainwashing programme to deprogram from them, from realizing that we’re actually right about pretty much everything!

Blair Cottrell: So I think it’s a pretty common. It’s a pretty common process with various agencies just to avoid that familiarity. Like, I’ve been through my stories in jail, how they would take prison officers and put them in our particular unit for three to four weeks, but then they would move them either to a different unit or even a different prison, if it was a prison owned by the same, or organised by the same administration, because we have some privately owned jails in Australia, and then we wouldn’t see those prison officers again for months.

So the idea was that as long as you’re not too familiar with, you don’t know the people you’re supposed to be watching or dealing with too well, then you pay more attention. You don’t miss as much.

So it’s kind of common sense as well. So I understand why it’s done.

But, yeah, it’s pretty funny that the Right. The drag programs, I can understand why that would happen. Is there any other news for this week? Have you noticed the wind? Have you noticed the wind? The wind?

Joel Davis: A gale outside.

Blair Cottrell: Been so windy the last few days. Part of my fence just blew apart, like, pieces of my fence everywhere. So I had to go out there and reinforce it with chains and stuff. I don’t know where it came from either. It hasn’t been as windy in ages, but crazy gale force winds down here in southeast Melbourne.

Joel Davis: Yeah. Has been pretty fucking windy.

Anyway, so we’re getting to the Superchats. White Power said:

“Thank you, sir. We love the White people!”

Obviously a reference to discourse. Ukrainian Groyper said:

“Talking to an Indian at service support is a gateway to racism.”

And it’s obviously very true. Do you have any funny stories of dealing with Indians, you know, tech support or telemarketers or anything like that? Blair?

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, I was just watching something else. What did you say?

Joel Davis: Do you have any funny stories of dealing with Indian, like, workers on the phone, like, tech support or telemarketers or anything like that?

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, nothing really amusing. This one thing comes to mind. Years and years ago, I used to play, like, Warcraft on this private server. And they offered these in game currency things, and I bought, like, $15 worth because I really wanted something in the game. Don’t worry, I don’t play games anymore. As I’m past this now, this is when I was younger, and it was some sketchy website, though. And I used my debit card to buy it, and I got it. Like, I got the in game currency that I was trying to purchase.

But then some hold got put on my account. My card wouldn’t work, and I got a phone call the next day from someone working at the bank. And it was an Indian guy. It was really hard to understand, but he seemed really distressed, and he seemed convinced that I’d been scammed. And I was trying to tell him:

“No. Like, I decided to make this purchase online. Like, I bought some tokens for a game. It’s fine, you can open my account again.”

But he wouldn’t believe me. And he’s like:

“Show me the website. Like, what website did you go to? What was it called? You know, they shouldn’t be taking money from your account.”

And I’m like:

“Bro, calm down. Listen.”

And then when he finally understood, he was just like, I’m just like, look, I bought tokens, and I got the tokens. Are you sure you got the Tokens? And I’m like:

“Yeah, I got the tokens, bro. It’s all good.”

He’s just like:

“Okay.”

But stuff that’s probably not that funny. But I don’t know, man. It’s not. There’s not really often amusing stories when it comes to dealing with Indians in public service, private sector, on the phone, rideshare services, it’s never amusing. It’s always just really frustrating. The smell of cigarettes, that accent, and the constant talking in a language that just does not sound very appealing to listen to. Obnoxiousness, inconsideration, arrogance. These are the words that come to mind when I think of dealing with Indian people.

Joel Davis: So where are you from? We are from India.

Blair Cottrell: Oh, great!

Joel Davis: That’s wonderful!

Thank you very much.

Blair Cottrell: That’s all I need to. Bob.

Joel Davis: No, I just found that funny. Even Trump’s landing to the pajeets.

But, yeah, I basically don’t answer the phone when it’s a number that I don’t know.

So I don’t really have any stories of talking to Indians on the phone because I seldom really talk to anyone on the phone except for my friends. That’s probably why I have no stories of getting a call from the intelligence services. Maybe they’ve tried to call me, I just haven’t picked up the phone. There’s no point.

Blair Cottrell: Have they actually have they actually never rang you? Because almost everyone gets a call eventually.

Joel Davis: Well, I would not have answered the phone. That’s the thing. Like, I don’t answer the phone and unless I know the number that’s calling me. Cause I mean, I barely wanna talk to the people I actually know, let alone people I don’t even fucking know, you know what I mean? What? Like what? Possibly if anyone needs to talk to me, they can send me a text or an email or something, you know what I mean? Leave a message.

But yeah, I don’t like I’m busy I got my own thing going on. I don’t wanna just like stop what I’m doing so that some random person I don’t know can tell me something like, I’m not interested. Um, Ukrainian groipe also said Indians are first incels. Do you mean they’re the first incels or. I don’t know exactly what that means.

But yeah, Indians obviously are like curry cells. They could be called like Indians obviously have the greatest incel characteristics because they’re the most repulsive. Southern fried 33 said phone battery at 88%. Okay, let’s go.

And he also said, hold the line. Fellow comrades said a good show. The G question is becoming more and more relevant, by the way. Lately people have been dropping tiny homes in backyards to avoid permits and take advantage of low rent demand, increasing density. Yeah, I have seen, I’ve seen those for rent online as well, where you can rent, you know, some tiny home in someone’s backyard. Yeah, and that’s what happens. Like when you flood the country with too many immigrants and there’s too many people to fit in in housing, then basically that’s what happens. Like you now all you can afford is to live in some shitty tiny home in some random dudes backyard because you can’t afford to have your own home. It’s pretty fucked up! GoyBoy 1488 said looking forward to the Joel slash Devon Stack collaboration, whenever that happens. He normally doesn’t have co-hosts that allow him to fully pop off. Yeah, well, I messaged him about it, he seemed keen, but he still didn’t go back to me about any of the details.

So maybe I shouldn’t have said anything until we actually organised something in concrete. But I sure we’ll do something at some point. And yeah, I do like his rants.

So that was one of my goals, was to provoke him into ranting.

Basically. Mr Webster said, I bet you lads have already seen the Pajeet world order documentary. Voice by the AI David Attenborough. Voice over what really made me feel that Indians need to be removed was their devastating impact on the global environment. Whites are the only race that care about endangered animal species in our planet. Yes, exactly.

On The Joel and Blair Show, we’re racist because, you know, we’re environmentalists. And yeah, they really are an invasive species.

Blair Cottrell: It’s no lie. I do like the environment, love being outdoors. I like animals. So it’s no lie.

Joel Davis: I like animals better than jeets or yeah, pretty much most other rate.

Blair Cottrell: Like all, you’re interested in humans generally, though, whereas I tend to be more interested in animals than I am in humans. Intuitively, I feel like I understand humans, but you have some sort of like, for you, humans provide this intrigue. Like, you’re really interested in learning about people and their ideas, whereas when I’m with a group of people, I will be the ones sitting over by himself watching birds or something like that. Like, I’ve just I lose interest in humans really quickly.

Joel Davis: Yeah, birds are cool. I remember going through, like, a bird autism phase when I was a little kid.

Anyway, what else we got here? Gandalf said, how is an Eastern religion compatible with Europeans? As of now, it is not imposed upon Europeans, enforce or culturally, and we see how Europeans have come to reject it and is decreasing. Is this a sign? It is unwelcome when Europeans have the opportunity to get rid of it. Are you talking about Christianity? I don’t know exactly what you’re talking about here by Eastern religion, but if you’re talking about Christianity, which presumably is what you’re talking about, Christianity was imposed by force in some areas, but also not really in most areas. Like, it did spread pretty naturally within the Roman Empire. The late stage Roman Empire did persecute, ultimately, pagans and heretics, but Christianity had already spread organically, and they persecuted largely, like, heretical sects of Christianity, like under emperor Justinian or whatever. Christianity spread, didn’t spread by force to Britain or Ireland, France or any of these places. It kind of went there naturally. It was imposed by force upon the Scandinavian countries.

And then, you know, people weren’t forced to stay. Like, it’s been hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years where people weren’t forced to stay Christians, you wouldn’t get put to death for not going to church or something. And Christianity has really only started dying out in the European people in, basically the last century and recently.

So to me, I think you have to look more at cultural explanations rather than just seeing it in terms of imposed by force.

You know, I think it’s kind of like a incorrect historical analysis. You have to look at the reasons why was Christianity appealing at a certain period in history and to what groups, and why is it maybe now unappealing? You know, it’s not just down to, oh, as soon as people didn’t get put to death for not being Christians, they all became atheists. That’s not actually an accurate picture of history. Hans Rudol said, not sure if you saw my link, but did you hear about the Israeli data leak from Iranian hackers? That was leaked on Telegram. That was only days before the Telegram guy got arrested. I did hear about that.

And undoubtedly, the Israelis would be one of the main interest groups, or the jews, obviously, one of the main interest groups in keeping Telegram censored, because, I mean, they’re the main interest groups in keeping the whole Internet censored. And Telegram, along with Twitter, is the second most key platform for getting information out that the jews don’t want that exists. Do you? What do you think about that, Blair?

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, what was the question? Sorry, I was just rereading some of the Superchats.

Joel Davis: Oh, no, it’s all good. It was just. He was just talking about how just a few days before Durov was arrested, there was a leak of sensitive Israeli data on Telegram by Iranians, Iranian Telegram channels.

And so people were speculating that there was something, you know, that had something to do with Durov being arrested.

But I don’t think it would have, because I think the plans to arrest him probably existed already, more than just a few days before it happened.

So I don’t think that was necessarily the cause.

But obviously, at the same time, the jews would want him arrested, I think, and would probably want Telegram censored and pressured into censoring discourse because they want a war platform censored, basically.

Blair Cottrell: Why does this word come to my mind? Give me 1 second. Precarious. Precarious. Not securely held or in position. Yeah, look, there’s the right word. Even though I wasn’t sure of its definition. Durov is currently in a precarious position. Position now. Just starting to get a little bit tired. It’s been a big day, but he’s in a position that’s obviously favourable to. How would you describe them? European governments, jewish influenced governments. He’s in their field now. So he made a mistake going to France, and he’s going to have to get out of this situation somehow. I’m not sure how he’s going to do it. Like I said, he’s best to sit tight for a few months and wait, but when the time is right, he needs to get out of there and not go back.

Joel Davis: He ingratiated himself with the United Arab Emirates Royal Family and has become a citizen of the UAE and the United Arab Emirates, which is where Dubai and Abu Dhabi is. Their government has now put pressure on the French government because they had an order, I think, of twelve fighter jets that the French manufacturer, and they cancelled that order worth many billions of dollars. And they’re putting a lot of diplomatic pressure on the French, saying, how dare you arrest our citizen. This is improper, and so on.

So that might help him, because that is not. That’s kind of significant.

So that’s probably smart of him to ingratiate himself with the UAE.

Blair Cottrell: In my mind, I’m feeling like there’s something, a move he should make right now, or maybe not right now, but soon. But I need to actually sleep and think on it before I can work it out, because, like I said, he needs to get in a position more favourable to his future. Right now, he’s in a position where he can be forced to take a deal that’s not to his advantage other than the bail deal, and the deal could affect. Telegram. I hope he doesn’t do that.

Joel Davis: Yeah, he just needs to get the hell out of there and not ever go back to Europe if you can. Like, you can probably just go hang out in some bullshit! I think he was already kind of hanging out in bullshit like, non-Western countries anyway, that won’t extradite him to Western countries.

So that’s basically probably going to have to be his life now if he wants to be Durov, the Telegram guy. I’m sure Elon Musk is sweating, too, because if they’re going to go after him, you know, would they do the same thing to Musk?

Blair Cottrell: Can they? What isn’t Musk in America? They can’t really do stuff like that.

Joel Davis: I mean, if he travels to Europe the EU has been pretty, and the British government has criticised him. Our government has criticised him in well publicized cases. So he probably feels nervous to travel to other Western countries outside of America now, to a certain extent, although arresting Elon Musk would be, like, crazy! Right? Because he’s got so allies, I think.

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think that would happen unless. That wouldn’t happen unless someone at the US State Department signed off on it or said it was okay first. Because how much influence does the US have over Europe? A fair bit.

Joel Davis: But say, Elon went there next week. Would they think:

“Oh, when Trump is in, Trump is allied with Elon, we get fucked on? Maybe now’s the time to do it.”

You know, there could be some kind of game. So he probably feels a little nervous, I would say he probably doesn’t feel 100% secure going to Europe right now. And the leader, the guy’s name, but the CEO of Rumble, he left Europe, I believe, got the hell out of there immediately after Durov was arrested, I guess fearing that.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he didn’t actually say anything until he was gone. Musk is a bigger fish than Durov. Much bigger fish.

So I think maybe the French government, the EU here, they’re trying to set a precedent. They’re seeing how this goes. This is their test case. They’re going to see what Durov does next and whether or not they can actually get a conviction. If they can get a conviction, that’s a big precedent. It’s a bad precedent. So it’s all going to be very interesting. I’ll be following it closely.

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s definitely important. Like, free speech on the Internet is vital for everything that we do. It’s so important that Twitter or X Telegram Rumble, these three sites in particular, are kind of protected and maintained. And I am a little bit concerned that after this election cycle, that maybe a little bit of freedom was opened up on Twitter and Rumble specifically to help fuel some kind of Right-wing sentiment that would help Trump get over the line, and that perhaps when he gets elected, they might cuck a little bit on their moderation policies because it no longer serves that temporary political advantage. I hope that I’m wrong about that, but it is a theory that many people have, which does have a little bit of sense behind it, because both the people behind Rumble and Elon Musk are supporters of Donald Trump’s election bid.

So that is a concern. So hopefully next year we don’t all get cucked and banned off everything again.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but Trump doesn’t really have the support of the meme as he’s not being propped up by, …

Joel Davis: Maybe they thought it would. It hasn’t really worked, though, because. Yeah, because Trump the culture has gone more radical. I mean, what we’re talking about tonight the most radical, the most popular thing on Twitter right now is hating Indians. Like, it’s literally the number one topic in the global Twitter discourse is how much Indian stink.

So, I mean, that’s hilarious!

But that is not what was happening in 2016. In 2016, people were making, you know, sensible arguments about how Islam, Islamic people have a propensity to commit terrorism and this kind of thing. It was much softer rhetoric back then on. And social media wasn’t as well regulated back then either, by the way. Like, you could post Nazi memes on Facebook, you could post Holocaust revisionist documentaries on YouTube and get away with it. And the censorship regime, in many respects, came in in response to the culture that was unleashed. What at first was a slightly edgy Right-wing culture, quickly mutated into what the Alt-Right became, which was full on hardcore White nationalist and pro-national socialist talking points proliferating all over the Internet. They shut that down. Then they kind of cracked things open again in the last year or two with this kind of Rumble.

And Twitter led counter attack against the censorship regime. And what has happened, it’s just unleashed an even stronger wave of racism back onto the Internet, where, like, Twitter is now 4chan, basically, in its level of discourse. And, yeah, will Elon Musk be able to hold that for in perpetuity? Does he actually even want to? These are open questions, but you’re right that I don’t think Trump is benefiting from it at all, because he doesn’t have that radical vibe that he had in 2016. And that’s partly because he’s a known quantity now.

Blair Cottrell: Even though he got. Even though he got a bullet, even though he took a bullet through his ear, he still doesn’t have the radical vibe. It’s pretty impressive. Like, it’s impressive level of normalisation he’s going for. He’s making a strong effort, I suppose, not to appear too radical despite someone trying to shoot him in the head. And I’m only narrowly surviving. It’s almost like that assassin assassination attempt is old news already. No one even cares. That’s what it feels like down here in Australia anyway. I’s like, all right, what’s next?

Whereas I think, you know, an assassination attempt on a US president, previously, it would have been big news for a long time, right? But politics moves so quickly now. And the average person’s dopagenic response, receptivity to information, power of remembering, it’s all much smaller.

And so it’s not even really a big deal to Australians that Trump almost got his head blown off. Now it’s like, if you mention it, someone will go, oh, yeah, yeah, I remember that. Yeah. But they’ll remember it as though it happened a long time ago.

Joel Davis: It was so hype at the time, and if you told me that in two weeks no one would give a fuck anymore, I would have said, surely not, but that’s literally what happens.

But you can only blame Trump. Like, he purposefully pivoted to the centre, like you said, and, yeah, made himself boring. And that was probably the strategy to beat Biden because he was kind of cruising to a victory over that assassination.

Blair Cottrell: Joel. That was after whoever it was tried to shoot him. That was the perfect moment to pivot to a more extreme message and really push hard. And he still would have been elected, he would have been loved, he would have won over the same powers that got him into the office in the first place before Joe Biden was in. Yeah, but he kind of wasted an opportunity there. I think he listens too much to his more lukewarm advisors. He does. Or maybe he just is too tied in with certain people and he can’t afford not to follow their directives at this point. I don’t know what it is, but politics is messy, it’s complex. I just think he missed a big opportunity there.

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely, 100% agree with you. And you can make the argument that the campaign this time, like the first time it was about the wall. Now he’s saying, let’s amass the port or the Mexicans. You can say that’s maybe even more radical the original time, but it feels less radical. And that’s partly because the Right-wing culture has moved on.

He has cucked in other areas and has a legacy when he was president and so on, of kind of cucking and failing to follow through. And the energy that was there in 2016 was this idea of, I’m going to go after the establishment, I’m going to put Clinton in the bushes and Obamas, I’m going to put them all in jail, and we’re going to lock up this corrupt establishment and America’s back, and the people actually have power again. He had that populist aura of taking on the establishment that no longer exists. Now it’s just about the policies. Oh, well, if you vote for Kamala, then you won’t get this policy or that policy. He’s just not the politician now. He’s not this kind of revolutionary figure. That was the energy of the 2016 campaign, which obviously a load of bullshit! As soon as he got in, none of that materialised. And they then went after him. They tried to lock him up. They did what he promised to do to them, to act to him.

And then he was like:

“Hey, you can’t do this!”

And just cucked and just showed weakness. I, that’s really the essence of why people don’t really have much energy for it, is because that kind of rebellion against the elites, that sense of people’s justice or whatever, that, like, bane from Batman energy that he had the first time is just completely gone now. And that’s the biggest loss. And, yeah, additionally, the campaign leaves a lot to be desired. They don’t, they’re not dog whistling White nationalism enough. They, if they wanted to win, they really had to energize White voters. And White people are energized, but they’re energized in a way that really doesn’t have much fuel for the Trump campaign. They’re energized just spontaneously by, like, current events, and they kind of feel politically alienated. He just seems like another conservative now.

And I think that’s a good thing because it shows that the Right-wing culture has progressed, it’s become more radical, it’s become more demanding that it’s not placated by a Trump anymore.

Blair Cottrell: But has it, in the process, though, has it become more detached from the masses?

Joel Davis: I don’t know. I think if you look at the data out of the United States the masses are way more in support of mass deporting non-White immigrants in America. You know, they’d done a poll a few years ago on Trump voters, and they said:

“What’s a bigger problem, racism or anti-White discrimination?”

And they all, I think, like two thirds of them said anti-White discrimination.

So, you know, they’ve done a lot of polling to show that Trump supporters and Americans in general are more closer aligned to us on racial issues. They’re softer on other issues, like they’re more pro-abortion, they’re more pro-gay marriage, they’re less Christian. You know, all these other issues that were previously conservative issues, like the social issues associated with conservatism, the Right has lost on all of those issues. The only place where they’re actually making gains is on racial issues. That’s the only place they’re making gains. But I, you’re not seeing a pivot, really in the political establishment that is a requisite to that.

I mean, we’re talking about in Australia, people care more than two years ago, everyone was talking about Covid and then climate change. No one cares about that anymore. Now it’s all about immigration, now it’s all about the housing crisis and shit like that! So, like, our political issues are winning out. Like our. I think we’re having a stronger presence again online with a Twitter opening up and so on. And European politics, where they actually have populist Right-wing parties that are plugged into youth appeal and so on, you’re seeing them all do very well in the polls and in elections over there.

So that shows that if we had an equivalent kind of political release valve for Nativist anti-immigration sentiment here, it probably would do very well. And in America, they probably do very well as well.

But it’s just our systems are different in the Anglo-sphere. We don’t really quite have that.

I mean, even in Britain the Reform Party did very well at the last election, then they had the riots, which was, in my opinion, I’ll still say it good to see an actual response from White people in Britain when their children are attacked, because plenty of those kinds of things have happened over the last few months or over the last few years, I should say, where innocent White children have been victimized and there hasn’t been a response like that.

So it was good to see.

And then the Reform Party is now polling above the conservatives and polling close almost to the Labor Party and the Labor Party sinking in the polls.

So the British public is responding to those race riots by getting more Right-wing, more pro-populist.

And obviously, we don’t support. We don’t think that a populist Right-wing party is going to be enough of like a Pauline Hanson style or Nigel Farage style politics. But if people are going more to that kind of politics in response to a race, right, that’s a good thing. That shows that it’s a start focusing more on the Right issues. Yeah, exactly!

So I think we are in the ascendancy culturally, and our ideas are getting more popular. Like, back during Covid no one was really talking about immigration, no one was talking about jewish power. Now because of what’s happening with Israel and what’s happening with the housing crisis and the immigrants flooding over the border after Covid across the Anglo-sphere, now our issues are the main issues again in politics.

So I think, yeah, we’re definitely in an ascendancy moment meta-politically, culturally. We don’t have the organisation institutionally to implement, to translate that into a proper political manifestation, really, either here or in America properly. So that’s, I guess the next step is building a more radical kind of politics.

And I think here, you know, we’ve got what we’re doing and the aspiration maybe to build a political party ultimately, if we can get enough manpower and resources together to do it. In America, though, building a small, minor party doesn’t really work as well in their system.

So they’re going to have to get more creative. I don’t know exactly what the solution, solution would be in America, but they, I think they need to detach themselves from the Trump thing, like, whether Trump wins or loses, this is the last Trump election cycle. I think they’ll be good for the American Right to have to look beyond Trump finally and come up with something else where they have to figure out, well, I think it would be creating in America pro-White lobby groups, pro-White advocacy groups that are of, that explicitly organise White Americans around their interests, rather than trying to just use the Republican Party, which is they’ve lost control of, it’s controlled by jews, and that’s filled now with non-Whites and non-White interests, it’s totally cucked!

Look at how the jews control things. The jews have all these pro-jewish organisations, and then those organisations then function as pressure groups, and they fund, they lobby and they fund people, and they embed themselves in the media, and they fund think tanks and fund people to then go into media jobs, go into political jobs, they fund political campaigns, they pressure politicians.

And so they’re able to exert power over the system through that infrastructure. I think White Americans should be trying to build that kind of thing.

And then through activism, through lobbying, through these kinds of mechanisms, try and change things, rather than just simply, we got to get the Republican guy elected. Guys, everyone, just cuck to whatever the platform is of whoever’s running on the GOP ticket and try and get them into power. That doesn’t work like that. You’re giving your loyalty in exchange for nothing.

Meanwhile, the jews, they give their loyalty in exchange for concessions. Every other group gets concessions in exchange for loyalty because they’re organised. Whites aren’t organised. They get no concessions for their loyalty, even though they’ve got the most votes, even though they’ve got the most money. They’re just not organised.

So I think that’s really the next step in America. And here, as well, political parties are really the last step of the process. After you’ve got your people organised, after you’ve got money, you’ve got manpower, you’ve got some kind of functional hierarchy where you can direct manpower and resources in an intelligent and strategic way. Now you’ve got a negotiation leverage to impose yourself upon politics and be able to be influential in politics. So figuring out that kind of project of political entrepreneurship in a pro-White way, to me, that’s the next paradigm for us, rather than just thinking in this narrow way in terms of party politics.

So anyway, there’s a bit of a rant, by the way, you know, people, I can see people asking questions in the chat, like, directed towards me, you know, this isn’t a fucking charity you want to ask me questions, fucking pay me, you know what I mean? But I did see one person ask me about in the Cozy chat, they didn’t pay me about my milk bottle. This, like, where do you get this from? Well, I bought this from Kmart for $3. We get, we get our raw milk supply, but it comes in buckets. And then I put it in the bottle myself. I don’t buy it in the bottle because raw milk isn’t something you can buy at the shop. It’s illegal for them to sell it to you at the shop.

So I have to bottle it myself, basically.

So that’s where I get the bottles from. And, yeah, I can’t recommend raw milk enough. If you can get a supply, it is vastly superior than pasteurized milk.

Blair Cottrell: Completely different flavour. Rich, slightly more sweet, creamy, more dense. Completely different colour, too. Like that milk from the supermarket. That pasteurized milk, it’s unnaturally White. Milk shouldn’t be that White.

Joel Davis: Yeah, and it’s just better for you in so many ways. Like, your body just takes in the nutrients so much more easily, and you can feel that.

And it’s also very good for fertility, I’ve heard.

But, yeah, I really highly recommend it. And it’s almost, when I drink like three litres in a day of raw milk, particularly of an evening, if I really like to lug it down, it’s got like a nootropic effect, almost like I feel like my mind is full of inspiration. Inspiration. And, yeah, it’s. I don’t know, it’s almost like a quasi spiritual experience.

Blair Cottrell: Raw milk, guys, the choice of autists, but it’s got lactase. One of the main reasons it’s actually easier to digest and better for you is because it doesn’t go through the pasteurisation process, meaning they don’t boil the living out of it. The lactase enzyme remains in the milk, which is what your body needs to digest the lactose. Right. The milk sugars.

And once that lactase enzyme is destroyed through pasteurisation, the milk sugars don’t digest properly. They don’t split properly during digestion. They need to split. That’s what the lactase does. And actually, lactose free milk doesn’t exist.

If you look at the ingredients on lactose free milk, it’ll say milk, cow’s milk.

And then the lactase enzyme is re added to the milk so you can digest the lactose properly.

So there’s no such thing as lactose free milk. They boil the milk traditionally, if it’s going to a supermarket, destroying the lactase enzyme, making it difficult to digest. And then for people who think they’re lactose intolerant, they buy lactose free milk. It’s not lactose free. They just re added the enzyme that they destroyed in the first place.

So there’s some milk information for you.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t really ever! I never had a problem with drinking regular milk. I still drink it when, like, I get a coffee or something like that. Um, or it’s in various other products, and it doesn’t really negatively affect me, but just raw milk is just so much higher quality like that. My body feels a lot better. You can just feel the sustenance from when you have a good steak or you have just high quality food, you just feel so much better. And raw, it’s not placebo. It definitely it definitely helps.

But yeah, we got more Superchats here. I got one on Entropy from the gump, who sent $14.88, which I always appreciate, and he said:

“Thanks for a good show. Is there any way to donate to Sewell’s house building project again?”

Yes, because we got de-platform from GiveSendGo on that one. We don’t actually have something set up right now, and it’s annoying because people are always asking me, how do I donate to the organisation? How do I donate to the organisation? And we need to get a new platform set up. We keep getting de-platformed, trying to set up ways to donate directly to the organisation, and we get a lot of money, I think, if we finally do. So hang tight. We’re working on it, and we’ll announce it soon when we come up with a solution. So that, yeah there’s a lot of people out there who say, I can’t really get involved because of this and that, but I’d like to help you guys out financially, obviously, we would appreciate that.

So, yeah, hang tight. It’s one way that that we’re not grifters, that we’re really terrible at raising money.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, we always have been to. I even feel bad when I get money. Like, I don’t know if it’s a result of how I’ve been raised or if it’s a spiritual thing, but even when I’m making money and providing like a good service as I do as a personal trainer and online coach, something still feels like guilty about getting money. It doesn’t sit right with me. It’s the weirdest thing. Like I let people off all the time.

Joel Davis: Rather not have to deal with money, like to risk the crowd of the soul. I just want to like have my land and then all the other casts are like performing their role and then I’m just studying the great works of literature and I’ve got like my long grey beard that I’m stroking and people come to me for advice and my wisdom and I’ve been just engaging in my affairs in the palace and everything is just taken care of I don’t really need to buy or sell anything. That would be my ideal existence.

But obviously that’s a bit impractical at the moment, but we’re working towards it. Yeah. White power also sent another Superchat with, no, they didn’t put a caption, so I got nothing to read out. Southern fried, 33, said enjoying the show and he also said Australia has the best fauna and flora. I don’t know if I really agree with that. Like I honestly do like some of the animals they have in Europe better. Like kangaroos are kind of cool, I guess, but a lot of like emus are fucking retarde Uh, wombats are kind of cute they work. Koalas are kind of cute or whatever.

But we don’t have a moose, a deer, like to me that shit would be cooler. You know, lions, I know, you know, wolves, we don’t really have that kind of shit! Which to me is like, we have an eagle.

Blair Cottrell: Got the wedge tail eagle. The wedge style eagle is pretty cool!

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, there’s some cool birds and shit, obviously, but kangaroo, we.

Blair Cottrell: Got the kangaroo, man. Have you seen some kangaroos? They’re jacked. Like almost any fat you can eat. Kangaroo. We have kangaroo meat for sale at the local supermarkets. It’s a strange meat. It’s a grainy meat that’s very lean. Like there’s no fat in it at all! It’s not clean by Christian standards because kangaroos have, like, paws, they don’t have hooves.

So I don’t know. I’ve tried it a few times. Can’t say I rate it, but it’s popular amongst bodybuilders because it’s just all protein.

Joel Davis: Kangaroo can be nice, but it’s very easy. It’s something that’s very easy to overcook. We used to get these kangaroo sausages that were quite nice on the barbecue.

But, yeah, I know that I don’t eat it that regularly. I’ve had some cool experiences with kangaroos.

Actually saw a few of them when I was up at the Gold Coast when we had our national meat. We first got up there, I was kind of with all these families with young kids and they wanted to go to the wildlife park.

So we went to the wildlife park and it was kind of nice, you know, seeing all the different animals that this, like, massive crocodile that was fucking huge. That was pretty impressive. But they had like a part where you can walk in and the kangaroos are all just chilling there and had this emu running around and I got like, a selfie with the emu and I was hanging out with some of the kangaroos, but they weren’t very. They’re pretty kind of low energy, to be honest.

But when I was a kid, I went to somewhere called Pambula, which is on the south coast of New South Wales. It’s near Bega and Marimbula, right near the Victorian border on the coast. There’s a big wildlife park there. I don’t know if it still exists because this was when I was a kid and it’s open and they got shitloads of kangaroos. And the kangaroos are used to humans, so you can walk up to them and pat them and stuff. They’re very friendly. And the kangaroos like it when you scratch them on the chest and they’ve got little arms like this and they just kind of go like. It’s kind of funny. Like they’re kind of retarded! They just love getting a scratch on the chest. But they got these big red kangaroos that are like fucking almost two and a half meters tall and shit! They’re massive! Pretty imposing.

But yeah, the kangaroos are kind of cool.

Obviously there’s an affinity with the kangaroo, but at the same time, I don’t know. I honestly prefer European animals. If I’m quite frank. The shogun said, hail victory, boys. Cheers. White power also said, question for Blair. How did you become so good at public speaking, especially with your previous protests back in the day? Do you mean rallies? And how did you become so articulate and well spoken, even in casual settings?

Blair Cottrell: Well, there’s a lot to unpack there. But what immediately comes to mind is you guys having the support of you guys, I sort of like, it just made me more passionate. It made me see that I wasn’t the only one who believed and understood what I believed and understood. And it just gave me the confidence. Just the constant support helped me to believe. Obviously, there’s more to it, and I can get into it a little bit more on another day, perhaps, because I’m a bit tired. We’ve been going for over two and a half hours now, and I’m almost ready for bed. What’s the time now?

Actually, yeah, we’re after 11:00 pm and I tend to be an early riser, so I’ll usually go to bed at about this time.

But, yeah, like. Look, I don’t feel like I am that good, especially as I’ve gotten a little bit older. I’m probably less articulate than I used to be, but, yeah, I didn’t even enjoy reading that much, to be honest. Like I said, there’s lots one pack there. I’d probably have to think about it. But I do appreciate the question, and thanks for the appreciation. I suppose.

Joel Davis: In my opinion, what makes you really effective at public speaking is your ability to tap into your emotional energy. And it just kind of rips through channels really effectively.

But also, I think, some of your best features. You were obviously applying the principles of Mein Kampf. You know, you had already kind of put a lot of thought into, how do I explain this very complex phenomenon in a way that is digestible to a normal person? And you’d obviously, like, kind of gone over that a lot in your mind.

And so you had your, like, core talking points and principles, so you’re able to just channel emotion into it, like a kind of aggression into a formula. And it came out very polished and very. But when people prepare what they’re going to say, you know, sometimes it can kind of seem like they’ve prepared what they’re going to say. And there’s something a little bit inauthentic about it.

But with you’re able to channel your emotion in such a way that it felt like it was just ripping out of you. And maybe it was to a certain extent like you prepared the ideas in your mind, but probably not the exact way of saying them. So it came out naturally. And that’s probably the key with public speaking.

Blair Cottrell: There’s three things or three parts of the formula which are coming into my mind. Hopefully I remember them. Maybe they’re slipping from my mind. Now the first one is you have to actually believe in what you’re talking about. How should I describe that? It’s extremely potent when in your voice there is that genuine belief. Because people, ordinary people, they might be simple, but they’re not as stupid as some people think they are. They pick up on things. They’re intuitive, as we’ve said previously, people in large groups are much like a woman. They’re feminine in their instinct and nature and as a result they are intuitive.

So although they might not always be following you on an intellectual level, they’re feeling you and they’ll know if you’re not actually genuinely believing in what it is you’re saying. That’s why Parliamentarians are never popular with the people, because Parliamentarians don’t believe in other than their financial backers and political results. They’re not really motivated by that passionate belief in something greater. Right?

So you need that you need to actually believe what you’re saying and it needs to mean a lot to you.

Secondly, you need. You need to have confidence and not be distracted by the thought of what other people are thinking about you.

And the best way to do that is to understand the audience you’re speaking to being the Australian people or just regular working class, the kind of people who are going to criticise your speech, pull it apart, analyze its contents, ridicule you and laugh at it. These people are always going to exist, but they only make up a tiny percentage substrata of the people you’re actually reaching with your words. You need to not pay attention to the small conceited intellectuals at the back of the room who are sniggering at the contents of your speech. Block them out. Think not about what people are thinking of you. Think only of the effect that you’re trying to create on the crowd of the standard working class people, right?

So I suppose the second part of the formula in that regard would be to have that mute button from criticism. Don’t actually read the critics or pay any attention to them whatsoever because critics aren’t the masses. The masses aren’t analyzing the contents of your speech like Professors of Political Science or academics and Marxists from the universities. So you don’t need to pay them any attention. Right. They’re not your targets. The people are your targets.

And the third one. It may have slipped my mind. Yeah, it may have slipped my mind, but what did I. What did I just mention? Then? The first one, I’m so tired. My memory is failing me.

The first one was, believe in what you’re saying. Believe in what you’re saying. The second one is, know your targets. Know who you’re speaking to. And I suppose there was another one I had there as well, but it just slipped my memory. I’m sorry, but these are the these sort of things. That’s it!

You have to understand people. You really have to have a good intuitive understanding of people.

And I think these three things together, these three things together are what can contribute to making you a better than average speaker.

You have to remember what speaking is.

At the end of the day. With words we spell. All I’m doing right now is sending out vibrations that mean something to you because we’ve created what we call a language, where we’re able to decipher the meaning of these vibrations, know through receiving them in our ear canals.

However, words have a magical effect on people in a number of ways. They can alter a person’s perspective of reality. They can also make them feel and think differently about a certain topic or thing.

And so what we’re doing when we speak is we are spelling an audience. We’re actually trying to cast a spell. And that’s the only real magic which exists in addition to symbology, words, symbols, language. This is real magic. Like, I think our understanding of magic through the times have become fables and myths about actual wands and real magical spells. That doesn’t. I don’t believe that exists. I think real magic is something much more palpable and something that we actually don’t recognise as magic on a daily basis. But we’re surrounded by it all of the time. It’s basically anything which is language, which is trying to get you to feel or think in a certain way.

So that was besides the original point that I was pivoting from, which was just understanding people, which is not something that you can necessarily always learn. You have to have the intuitive senses. And by that, I mean you have to actually be from the people. You can’t be too far removed from the ordinary worker, which is, I suppose, where I was blessed somewhat, if you want to call it a blessing. Being a public speaker and dissident hasn’t really worked out to my personal advantage.

So maybe it’s not a blessing, but I’ve basically got half a normie brain, is what I’m trying to say, which is quite feminine, which allows me to tap into the feeling of people around me. Like I can walk into a room, I can make eye contact with people. I know how they’re feeling, I know what they’re thinking, sort of not word for word, but I’ve got that intuitive sense that’s necessary to understand people on an, on the level that’s required to actually influence them through the spoken word. And it’s something that I don’t know. Like I said, I don’t actually think I’m that good. I’m not as good as I could have been with the right kind of nurturing and education. So there’s, like I said, there’s a lot to unpack. It’s a subject that I’m actually quite interested in. And I did a bit of research in when I was young, but I hope I’ve been articulate in my answer to your question.

Joel Davis: Well, you’re only getting started, Blair, because politics is actually an old man’s game. We’re all quite young. We’re not anywhere near our peak as political actors.

Actually, you’re not supposed to really be that influential in politics in your twenties and your thirties.

I mean, how many politicians or political leaders can you think of that as young as us when they’re in their peak of influence? I mean, it’s very rare.

So we’re all just getting started, actually. A long career ahead of us. We’re kind of stuck with it now. Because once you become a White nationalist, prominent White nationalist, I mean what the fuck else are you going to do?

Blair Cottrell: Hitler says you shouldn’t enter into public politics until after 30. Yeah, because before they, …

Joel Davis: He’s probably right. Like, if I didn’t say anything and then jumped in, now, people would probably like me a lot more than all the immature shit that I’ve done up to this point.

Blair Cottrell: But anyway, you can’t turn back the clock, so you got to stick with it now. But it is good advice. It’s good advice, which I actually ignored because I read that advice.

But then I just charged into public politics at 25. I’m like, I’m not waiting five years. I saw an opportunity, I saw an opening, and I went for it, but I sort of generated a reputation.

But look, even though I’m generally bad PR for mainstream politicians, no one wants to really have me on their show, their television program. It’s too controversial. You know, it’s Blair Cottrell. The reputation that I did generate is still useful and really amusing in the sense or in regards to the reaction that generates from certain people. Like, you can see all these Leftists on X. Ever since I joined X again, I’ve been having some fun and just dropping comments on posts that appear in my feed here and there. And they’re all like, just arguing about something kind of lightly. And then I show up in the comments and just my name, just my name sets them off. They fall into a hysteria. I can’t believe it’s me. And they just go wild. Any guys they were sort of trying to uphold about being a humanitarian and actually just wanting to be nice and help people is suddenly just dropped. They suddenly drop it and just become absolutely vicious and resort to vicious insults.

So just my name has this effect on Leftists where they just like kind of lose control of themselves emotionally and reveal what they actually are, which is just hysterical morons who just actually hate White people and want to see them die. And that’s what comes to the surface just at the sight of my name or just by seeing my face. They lose their minds. And it’s really interesting the effect that I have on people in that regard, just from the reputation that I’ve made.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I feel like left just insults online whenever I get them are always so juvenile. It’s like stuff like:

“Oh, your mum should have swallowed or you’re a numpty. Oh, you’re a racist. Oh, what a piece of shit you are. Oh, you, why don’t you suck my dick, you racist?”

Like, don’t even say suck my dick. That would be too masculine. They say even gay than that. Like it’s just like the dumbest, like most low rent insults that you’ve ever heard. It’s not even offensive.

Blair Cottrell: You, like you want that kind of stuff though, because it demonstrates that the people who oppose you are generally over hysterical, unintelligent morons.

Whereas like the way you actually, you don’t really respond to criticism at all!

But if you do, you respond to it sort of ironically, playfully and like it’s not bothering you that much. That’s one of the rules of politics, I suppose you could say. But the Left don’t really know how to do that. The Left fall into absolute hysterics and genuine emotionally driven hatred and it makes them look childish and ridiculous every time. And it’s one of the ways we made them so unpopular back in the days of my activism, we would lure them down.

Joel Davis: Whenever I talk shit about blacks online, I get all these death threats in my inbox. Like:

“Oh, wow, I’m getting a death threat from some black guy from America. I’m so scared!”

Like, what are you going to do, faggot? Like, we’re going to fly to Australia and come find where I live. Like, you have, like, 85 IQ. You won’t know where I live. No one knows where I live. But you ain’t finding me. You ain’t coming here. You can’t even have a gun here. Like, what are you gonna do, try and fight me on the street? Like, I’ll probably win? Like, you just like some dumb retard online? Like, you’re not. You’re gonna do that? You’re not gonna do anything!

Blair Cottrell: You just said that you do have to be careful, though, having said that, because chances are in your lifetime, someone’s gonna try to stab you, and it’s not even because of politics. It’s not even because of politics. It might just be because you were in wrong place at wrong time.

But if you are a White guy, your chances of being stabbed, at least, you know, someone trying to do that a few times in your lifetime, I think they’re actually significantly greater than if you were, like, an Indian or an African or maybe not. Africans are always stabbing each other, so maybe that’s a not true.

The point is, you got to be careful and you got to be prepared for people to kind of ambush you. I’m seeing a lot of disturbing videos circulating online, some from England, some from Europe, where people are set upon by groups of migrants, and they’re stabbed. They’re stabbed in places that could easily kill them if they don’t seek immediate medical attention.

And I, in my day to day life, take various proclamations just to try to avoid anyone taking advantage of me while my back is turned or while I’m unprepared, because the last thing I want is to have spent 20 years building my body up and increasing my strength, you know, taking pride in myself, only to be, like, stabbed in the back of the neck and killed in 5 seconds. I’d be so devastated by that. Well, I wouldn’t be alive to be devastated, but, you know what I’m saying? I don’t want to. I don’t want my. I don’t want all my training to go to waste. And I want to keep my wits about me for that reason.

So, you know, sitting, knowing the exits to where you are, sitting with your back to the wall, keeping your hands up near your face if you can, even if it’s just scratching your chin like you’re pretending to scratch your chin, just to always be semi-prepared. It’s, in my opinion, better than just hoping someone doesn’t try something. Why would you sit with your back to a door not knowing who’s going to come in if you didn’t have to do that?

Like if you had the choice of sitting with your back to the wall where you could see the door. It’s stuff like that to me is just common sense. But I suppose all men think about this, or should think about this. Like I said, even if you’re not in politics, even if you’re not someone who’s a known public figure or something, I think it’s just something men should do as just general precaution, you know?

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I don’t know if I ever get recognised by Leftists, because if I do, then I have the balls to actually act upon it or do anything about it. Whenever I get recognised in public, it’s always someone who’s sympathetic.

In my experience, you might have a, …

Blair Cottrell: Different experience, but yeah, I’ve been recognised a few times. I’ve only been most of the time when I’m recognised.

And I’m not just saying this, it’s just people who want to get photos and shake my hand. There’s a lot of, there was a lot of working class support for our group and our activism back in the day. It was almost like a household name, the United Patriots Front in Australia. And after I got censored, obviously it was difficult to maintain that. It was also a very explosive sudden development. So it’s hard to keep the fire burning with that. So those sort of activist groups as well.

But three times I’ve been approached by someone who didn’t appreciate me. The first time was in the northern suburbs of Melbourne while I was at just a Tucker shop getting some food on a lunch break. I was working with some, with a builder, with some labourers at the time, and just an overweight guy who was in the same shop who said that the, he said the people working at the shop shouldn’t have served me because I was a Nazi. And I didn’t really make much of a fuss about it because I just wanted to eat my lunch and go back to work.

So that’s what I did. But the second time was interesting. I was on a train coming home from the city again, coming home from work, back to the southeast region, and there was someone on the train looking at me funny. And I sensed that he recognised me. So I kept looking generally in his direction without looking him directly in the eye. And then it’s like finally he realised who I was and he shouted from across the other side of the carriage, I know you’re that fucking racist, Blair Cottrell. And I said:

“Yeah, yeah, that’s me.”

And he was a Muslim character, a young guy, but like one of those westernised Muslims with sleeve tattoo.

So all the tattoos down his arm, his beard was like, trimmed really nicely. So not like a hardcore fundamentalist Muslim. Probably didn’t go to mosque or anything like that, but I don’t know, some kind of Arab dude. And he pulled his phone out and he started filming me, right? But only after I said:

“What did I say to him? He started insulting me first after I said:

 

“Yeah, I’m Blair Cottrell, you’re a fucking piece of shit, mate!”

Something like that.

And I said to him, all I said, this is all I said, I said:

“You got to be careful, mate. Just insulting people in public, you don’t know because you know, you can get your jaw broken.”

And he goes, are you going to break my jaw? And he pulled his phone out and he started filming me.

And so I just didn’t say anything after that. He kept insulting me. He walked a few paces towards me, but no closer. He was probably standing about 15 meters away. And he was bothering some of the other people on the train who were asking him to please be quiet. I was just looking out the window, ignoring him at this point. And the train driver stopped the train. The police were called. He refused to leave the carriage at first until the police came. And the police actually cuffed him and took him off the train.

And then when he was on the train station, outside the train, while cuffed, he claimed, he made a statement to police and claimed that I tried to start a fight with him because I was a racist. And that’s what the police officer came into the carriage and told me that he said. And the police officer said:

“What? What happened?”

And I said:

“No comment, mate. Just no comment. I’m just trying to get home from work. No comment.”

So I didn’t say anything.

And the only reason they let me off and didn’t kind of take me as well, the police, they didn’t take me is because just a couple of random girls, ladies coming home from work, also on the train, stood up for me. They said:

“No, he was just sitting there. And this other guy started filming him and swearing at him and screaming at him!”

And so the police took the statements from the other people on the train and left. They left me alone and I could go home. I never heard anything else about that.

That was the second time.

The third time was I was just shopping in a grocery store, local one, actually, for groceries, as one does. And someone was following me. I could sense them at first, and then I turned my head enough so I could see them. See them in the what do you call it, your peripheral vision. And, yeah, I wasn’t sure at first, but then after a while, I was pretty sure because I went down three different aisles, and he’d followed me the whole time. I got to look at the guy. He was average height, overweight, wearing a face covering.

But this was during the Covid sort of pandemic saga.

So a lot of people wearing face coverings, but his was particularly dirty bandana sort of thing. And he had a baggy, dirty T-shirt on with a picture of I think it was Tupac. But it was something like that, kind of like dreaded hair, like very dirty hair. A White guy, but not a healthy White guy. And he walked past me and I stood aside to move for him eventually because he was starting to get really close to me. And I was almost certain he was following me and I was having a bad day.

So this was one of those moments where I reacted the way I would usually react as I moved to let him walk past me. And I just waited until he did. It’s like he kind of realised that I knew he was following me.

So he gave up. And he walked right up to me with his bandana on. And he said:

“You better watch your back, you fascist cunt!”

And I was like:

“Fucking what, mate?”

So I shoved him, right, because he was right here. He was right in my face. I shoved him hard. He fell over. I took a few steps forward because he was still mouthing off at me, and I shoved him again, bounced off the shelves, and some peanut butter and glasses, like jars of jam fell on top of him. And it was at that moment I realised I shouldn’t have shoved this guy. I shouldn’t have touched him. I think the first shove was okay legally.

But then when I stepped forward, like, he got up again, I stepped forward and pushed him over again. And he kind of like sustained some damage by bouncing off the shelves. That’s when I realised I’m probably on camera and I shouldn’t be doing this. It was so difficult, though. All I wanted to do was just execute that guy straight up. I just wanted to break his skull open, man! How dare he follow me and threaten me to my face. I wanted to crush his fucking skull. It was so hard not to.

Sorry, I’m getting a bit worked up recalling the memory, but I just walked away and I had a it was a difficult. It was a difficult calm down period. It took about 40 minutes. I usually calm down faster than that, but, yeah, 40 minutes. And then I just didn’t care anymore. And I was laughing about it. But the police came to my door a few days later and they told me they wanted me to make a statement because he’d made a statement. And I said:

“No, thank you.”

So they left and they came back about three months later and they said:

“Look, we’ve reviewed the footage. It’s pretty clear that he was following you and that he antagonised you, however, and we weren’t going to charge you.”

They said:

“However, the guy has been emailing the commissioner or the assistant commissioner, and we’ve had a directive from high up to charge you with something.”

And they just confided this in me, these constables, because they actually didn’t want to serve the papers on me. These constables didn’t want to do it. They were just like, really reluctant and apologetic and explaining the whole situation. They didn’t have to tell me any of this. They said that, quote, unquote, “victim”, the guy who followed me in the supermarket, he emailed the commissioners or some high ranking police bureaucrat. I remember them saying some sort of commissioner, and they had to charge me with something. So they picked the lowest possible assault charge they could find. It was a summary offence called unlawful assault. Summary meaning you don’t need to be on bail for it’s probably just going to be a fine, or a good behaviour Bond or something. And I said:

“Right, okay, thank you.”

I went to court. What did I get? I think I got a fine for it. And that was it.

He didn’t show up to court or anything like that. He’d taken photos of his body and provided them to the police, you know, this noble, “anti-racist, anti-fascist”. There was no actual bad damage. There was just some bruising, I think, but there was no proof that that actually came from the result of that was a result of me pushing him.

But, yeah, there’s only three times I’ve been approached, and I suppose I’ve been rambling on for a while about it now. Three times that it was a that it was a negative fashion, you know.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ve heard those stories before, but I’m sure the audience enjoyed them. Fellow Comrades said:

“Blair seems to ignore the current trending talking points, cuts through them and just speaks his mind.”

Well, that’s one thing that I think is refreshing about Blair. He’s always got his own spin on things, which is unique.

I also want to mention. So I jumped on this Twitter space the other night. I finished training with the boys, and everyone was talking. I pulled my phone out and I saw there was these libertarian accounts, Australian libertarian accounts, on Twitter. I think John Goddard was the account that was hosting the space with a couple other guys. And the space was called Australian nationalism. And they were kind of presenting themselves like, as if they were spokespeople of Australian nationalism, but they were basically civic nationalists. They were like, well maybe there’s too many immigrants, but as long as you salute the flag and you embrace Australian values or as Aussie as anyone else, like that kind of stuff.

And I was like, I got to jump in on this, like, heal what a real nationalist thinks. And another, another account jumped in first, and he was saying some stuff, and they didn’t let me out for a while, but I told the group chats, like comment in this, tell them to let Joel up.

Eventually they did, and I had a chat with them and I thought it went pretty well, actually, though, I think I defended the position quite well. And they kind of made, I think they were quite sympathetic, actually, to a lot of the points that I was making. And I was thinking, that’s really good! You don’t get those opportunities a lot in Australian politics to talk to where people that are more towards the centre but on the Right, you have a little bit of a platform, will talk to someone like me or someone like Blair. And whenever that does happen, I think we always handle ourselves very well because our worldview has got a lot going for it.

And often the only reason why people haven’t really contended without our ideas that often because they’re so marginalised and repressed and so on, that when they are confronted with them, usually they have very poor counter-arguments and don’t really know how to defend themselves against it, particularly if they style themselves as kind of populist Right-wing, wing Australian patriots or whatever, then it’s especially hard for them to counter our talking points. You have to take the opposite, like Left-wing worldview almost to be able to oppose us properly. So that went quite well. And I’d like to do more things like that. And they were friendly and good natured. And I appreciate that.

I think we should always endeavour to have dialogue open with the libertarians and the conservatives and so on as much as possible. And I do believe that our ideas are better than theirs and that in a free and open forum of discourse, we’ll win people over. So I’m thankful to them for being friendly and good sports. But this other guy jumped on, called Reptile Hybrid on Twitter. He’s X.com reptile hybrid. He seems like a conspiracy theorist of some description.

And anyway, he jumped on quickly to say that he was enjoying the space.

And then he invited me on to do a space with him this Sunday night at 08:00 pm so I agreed to doing it because he’s got like 60,000 followers. He’s got a pretty good platform. He does spaces regularly.

And yeah, it’s good, as I said, to talk to these adjacent factions. He jumped on and he said:

“Oh because we’re talking about immigration, he said, the people that run the world, they’re trying to replace western populations and it’s on purpose. And whatever they’re called, I don’t, we don’t know what they are. They reptilians? Are they Freemasons?”

And I was like:

“I know what they are, mate. They’re the jews!”

And anyway, so we’ll go and have a chat to a conspiracy theorist about the jews, I guess, and other things.

And anyway, he seemed interested to have a conversation, and that’s always good. Uh, whenever, you know, people are open minded and want to have a chat. Oh, you know, that was a really good thing about when I did the streams with Elijah Schaffer or things like, whenever anyone in conservative adjacent wants to talk to us, we should always take those opportunities and try and be friendly to the ones that are friendly to us. So support that stream. It’s reptile underscore hybrid. Hybrid. I will. I don’t really know him, honestly. I don’t really know him from other than that brief two minute interaction. But he seems like a nice guy, so it should be interesting.

I’ll post links on social media so you guys can tune in if you want something to listen to on Sunday night 08:00, pm I’ve been jumping on Twitter Spaces more lately. I’m enjoying them again. There was a period where I was jumping on Twitter Spaces all the time, and then I stopped doing them. Organised a few Twitter Spaces a few months ago with some people on Right-wing Twitter that I liked, and I should probably start doing that again because I thought that was good content. But Twitter Spaces are underrated, I think, because they can facilitate conversations where people who maybe wouldn’t be as interested in collaborating with you in a formal way.

But if you jump on a Twitter space and they’re on a Twitter space, they’ll have a chat. There was a Twitter space the other day that another nationalist account, Percy Sneedinson, he organised a Twitter space where he. I think he got into an argument with some Marxist on the top on Twitter about immigration and the housing crisis. And then I jumped in on that, and we all just kind of ganged up on this Marxist. It was pretty funny. That kind of shit is fun. Twitter Spaces are unique in that respect.

So if you’re not on Twitter, jump on Twitter and so you can follow those Twitter Spaces. I think, Blair, we should probably do a Twitter space actually, one night, actually.

Blair Cottrell: The audio works really well on Twitter for some reason. Whatever software or programs Twitter uses to record audio through the spaces, it works really well with my microphone, I noticed.

But, yeah, I’m more than willing for now. I’ve got to go, though. I’m like, I’m really tired. I’ve got to nearly start with work in the morning, so I’m going to have to let you go. But thanks, everyone, for your questions, for tuning in. Thanks very much to everyone for the Superchats. There was plenty of them this week, and I’m sure that makes Joel grinny smiley happy.

But, yeah, I’m out. See you later.

Joel Davis: I see, man. Yeah, I’ve got to go through the last couple Superchats here. Hands Rudol. He said another $14.88 Superchat said for. Thanks for the solid milk advice. It was me with the milk questions. I think a few people were asking milk questions.

And then also Alt Cuperian said:

“I’m seeing a lot of people in my life jump on board with race, realism, friends and family, people in my church. I’m feeling a vibe shift.”

Yeah, a lot of people are saying this. It does seem to be a vibe shift, but, yeah, we’ll end the stream there. Thanks for watching. We’ll see you all next week. Something that I’m doing the Twitter space. I will actually probably look into seeing how I can broadcast the show on Twitter as well. And I need to get set up. The GoyimTV guys said I could broadcast there. I want to just try and put the show on as many different platforms as possible.

But yeah, I’ll let obviously let you guys know on social media, on Telegram and stuff when I do anything.

So if you want more content, keep an eye out for that.

But in the meantime, thanks for watching. We’ll see you next week. Goodbye.

[3:03:58]

END

top

============================================

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/2/2024 = 62)

Seppl88
1 hour ago
Here is piece on Jewtube, places a pre-Semitic White racial stock was present in the Middle East. The Semites came in much later in history. No the original Hebrews were not White!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp6H0VSvi9Y Aryan Bloodlines of Ancient Babylon – ROBERT SEPEHR
0 likes

Seppl88
1 hour ago
Good point, Indians are the very example of the result of miscegenation that is Racial Chaos.
0 likes

Seppl88
1 hour ago
Europeans are simply the best, we are truly a new unique and gifted race that the world envies and our cultural and technological achievements have been adopted by all races. This is being used against us.
0 likes

Seppl88
2 hours ago
Verbose critters, that are loud. “Thank you, come again” Apu from the Simpsons comes to mind.
0 likes

Seppl88
2 hours ago
Jeets are the new proxies of Jewish power. They are being flooded into the West to become the new managerial class to displace the White man. They are corruptible and easily for the Jews to use in their agenda. BTW most other coloured races also hate Indians, there are particularly objectionable in their behaviour , dirty and ugly to boot.
0 likes

masklophobix
6 hours ago
Europeans are descended from Noah’s son Japheth. (After The Flood – Bill Cooper)
0 likes

jvlake
7 hours ago
I work in IT, what Joel said at 21:51 is 100% correct! Sales/project people are usually still white and speak English, but once the contracts are signed it’s Mumbai all the way!
0 likes

ProvingNihil
8 hours ago
Joel I’m the exact same, I never pick up my phone to random phone numbers. Hell I rarely pick it up to anyone I know, can’t stand talking on the phone to begin with.
0 likes

ProvingNihil
10 hours ago
And I’m the same way I stare at non white’s as well, because I don’t trust them or like them.
0 likes

FenrisRagnarok
15 hours ago
*90 minutes of passionate racism later* “I wouldn’t wanna get my bank account closed for hate speech” bruh -.-
0 likes

AntiwokeMMA
15 hours ago
Pajeets are a plague on this Earth. There are enough of those superfluous cunts to ruin every White nation, and their jewish masters know this well.
1 like

Corkly
1 day ago
A Rumbler I shall be, it’s a Rumbler’s life for me. And here at our home on Rumble this do I decree: I wanted to be left alone and enjoy Iron Man. But then wokeness came for my favourite cartoons and movies. Now I see the inevitable battle. We must kill all our enemies, everyone different to us will be executed worldwide. We will have limited government and free market, and return to Christianity. I pledge to not let anything, friend, family or spouse, deter me from my hatred. – The Rumbler’s pledge
1 like

ProvingNihil
1 day ago
Love listening to this while driving, people give me stares haha but I don’t care.
1 like

vigilantejustice23
1 day ago
Sinwar learned Hebrew in prison – would’ve been an interesting topic to touch on. It’s also critical to acknowledge that the reason Js seem so different as a group is because they’re a parasitic organism fundamentally.
0 likes

Buzzerka
1 day ago
I tried to have a talk with you and Barry yesterday on X. I know my X name sounds sus “Bjorn Wartooth” but I’m on probably my 50th account due to being banned so many times. I actually have a real funny story to share. I think you will get kick out of how a friend of mine dealt with a kaffir in South Africa
0 likes

Truthseekerchuck
1 day ago
yall are based. Good stuff. Cheers from North Carolina, USA. Lets get our civilization back brothers.
0 likes

Stephanie795
1 day ago
Introverts get drained when socialising for to long. They need to be alone to recharge.
1 like

Se7enius
1 day ago
theres no way blacks are graded above indiansn guys. Get real
0 likes

marv_perplex
1 day ago
Regarding noise pollution, it’s pretty much the same with all brownoids. African, Hispanic, Indian, Arab, etc. cities never sleep. The way they use common areas is just not the same as white westerners.
1 like

Rumbolinawave321
2 days ago
I watch this for amusement. Joel the Jew pretending to be Catholic and Blair the meat head trying to be academic. You people sound up to date yet very ignorant!
0 likes

ADC789
2 days ago
What do you think scares the living fucking shit of them? Thousands and thousands of working class white Australians jointly reading free legal textbooks and rapidly evolving into Constitutional autodidact communities across every municipality in the country. Or 70 dudes dressed like Ninjas on parade. I just told you how to utterly destroy the enemy, I mean absolutely smoke them. Every single thing they’ve done from The Native Titles Act to Drag Queens in public can be held up in legal challenges til the end of fucking time. Get reading and win.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago
Before anyone says oh but it’s the visuals it’s the visuals. What could be better “visuals”, than a six foot four 30 year bogan called Steve wearing a flanno and Rollin a smoke espousing Section 73 of The Australian Constitution at Frankston Local Court House every time he destroys some Legal Aid dickhead lawyer he wiped the floor with.
1 like

Doubleud40
2 days ago
To Blair’s point about indians intermixing and creating this hybrid race, and this accounting for their deficiencies, this Indian guy just started at my office and lucky for me, picked the seat next to mine as his permanent desk. So aside from his weird smell and ridiculous accent i can’t understand, he has this awful habit of cracking his bones, i say bones cause it’s anything from his fingers, to his neck to his back. Every fucken part of his body cracks for no reason whenever he moves around. Literally sends a shiver down my spine when i hear it. His first day i asked him to stop cracking his knuckles, cause it sounds annoying af every 3 minutes, and then i noticed his entire body cracks and pops constantly, wtf is wrong with his body? He also has zero muscles. It’s almost like he’s just, i don’t know…built different?
0 likes

Motion937
2 days ago
It isn’t just housing. It is race & therefore culture. Blacks need to be in Africa. Indians need to be in India. They do not need to be housed in White countries. Race matters. Race creates culture. They seem happy to flee from their own shit holes to come leech off of us. Why is that? Because their own people are shit with a shit culture. Why else leave?
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motion937
2 days ago
Blacks in the USA are annoying because they constantly bang on about White supremacy & romanticize shithole Africa for some stupid reason, yet they don’t get the fuck out & move to Africa. Everyone is full of shit.
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago
Same thing here in Australia. You can’t leave your home without being reminded that you’re walking on stolen land from some tribe of nomads that supposedly existed on it for six hundred thousand years or something? So if it is theirs, uh huh, why don’t you give them back your own house you uppity leftists cunt, is what we all want to say. It’s all able to be challenged legally of course but the whites prefer to watch football and do nuffin
0 likes

Motion937
2 days ago
In terms of people being bad at their jobs for basic services, I can say I noticed a MASSIVE difference in the quality in the USA when certain Grocery stores started hiring negroes from the other side of town instead of white people in our own community. Everything goes to shit. That is a constant problem in the USA. Which is why we tend to have white flight. If we are not going to have forced segregation, then we will have white flight when people try to force integration. The “stay & fight” deal doesn’t work unless you can force these people out. Otherwise, it ends up a mixed shithole that ultimately ends up with white people having to leave if they want a better quality of life. Segregation is the answer. It just needs to be by law. White people need their own countries. It isn’t complicated. It is only complicated when people start making excuses as to why that is bad. I have no problem with those who disagree going to live with shitskins. Just not here.
4 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Truthseekerchuck
1 day ago
Until we remove the jew from all facets of our society, this will not stop. The Jew needs to be removed from lobbying, financial institutions, media, ext. We need to fully remove any jewish influence. Then we can work on removing their pawns, or the brownoid invaders.
0 likes

BortSampson
2 days ago
I’m gonna miss Barry Stanton
1 like

EvanL
2 days ago
The welsh language is evidently very similar to Hebrew, so much so that Welshmen can read and understand Hebrew. How’s that for evidence that the anglo-saxons are the true Israelites?
0 likes

ADC789
3 days ago
Mega KEK
0 likes

PhDintheJQ
3 days ago
14卐88
3 likes

TheBrazenCarCharger
3 days ago
The fact that there are more Indians than white people should be enough to say no to Indian immigration
1 like

thorne91
Supporter+
3 days ago
Hebrews were white. Jesus was basically proto-Irish. That’s why all the depictions of him are a white guy. Gaelic is similar to Hebrew in many ways. “Lost Tribes” became Celts/picts, Saxons, Goths, Gauls, Visigoths, Nordic/Scandinavians, and possibly Slavs too. In 2024 the ones calling themselves “Jews” are actually Canaanites. Arabs are from Ishmael. Blacks are from Cush. Whites are the line of Isaac and Jacob. Eustace Mullins did a TON of research on this. That’s why the “Jews” killed Christ. He called them the Synagogue of Satan. “Those who say they are Jews but are not, and lie.” It explains basically everything. Eustace Mullins audiobook “The Curse of Canaan” is free on Bitchute.
0 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
thorne91
Supporter+
3 days ago
I encourage anyone to check out that audiobook. It will fill your heart with love for your people, purpose, and the knowledge that YHWH actually is real, we actually ARE here for a reason, and we have a distinct enemy that absolutely HATES us specifically. Why else would Jews target only white countries with invasion? It’s clear. They are of Ham and Canaan, Noah’s grandson who sold his birthright for a bowl of soup. And they are jealous of her sons of Isaac – Isaac’s Sons – SAXONS
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
hadefo
3 days ago
comment on mi replies if you’re interested on the thing i said. jesus and the egyptian prophet by lena einhorn is not directly cited in the videos i marked, but it’s relevant too.
0 likes

hadefo
3 days ago
i found that theory reading the work of ralph ellis, a well educated freemason you can find on youtube. he doesn’t say the same as you, directly, but it’s pretty obvious the implications are that the jews were some sort of europeans. look it up. you’ll find it interesting and you’ll find data that’s not outside freemason circles.
0 likes

thorne91
Supporter+
3 days ago
Holy fuck. I’m in Texas and if we are getting the “better indians” y’all must be dealing with pure trash
1 like

‹ Hide 2 replies
hadefo
3 days ago
when they are few, they act polite. but once they are more, they are other story.
1 like

ADC789
3 days ago
Ever been to Fiji
1 like

SpainforSpaniards
3 days ago
#freebarry
2 likes

FLmetalhead
3 days ago
Just got suspended on X and have no idea why. Has anyone had to make a new account? Pisses me off.
1 like

Chingadero
3 days ago
to paraphrase Barry Stanton (who’s account is now suspended on X)- “India could send 1 000 000 people to 200 different country’s. And still have 1.2 Billion people. Let that sink in.”
11 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
BortSampson
2 days ago
Terrifying
1 like

GaiusAlexander
3 days ago
Blair if you want to learn a language jumpspeak is the most natural flowing app I’ve tried.
1 like

Winz0
3 days ago
pajeets are STINKY
6 likes

Lueger
3 days ago
40:14 Sidenote: “Ave Maria” is “Hail [victory] Mary” in Latin. Most people know the Schubert version, but there is a Bach version also.
4 likes

FilisKGB
3 days ago
Joel do something sexier with the hair.
3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
3 days ago
Fucking creeping us out Bruh. Seriously you’re being watched by tens of thousands per episode, get a stylist on the case.
0 likes

JimboinLA
3 days ago
‘The white race is the most beautiful and interesting.’ Hollywood is going broke because they are trying to deny this and elevate and make the focus about the lesser races. And no one is saying it except a few who are censored.
11 likes

evon626
Supporter+
3 days ago
Challenge: Blair remain on topic. Difficulty: Impossible.
10 likes

evon626
Supporter+
3 days ago
I must preserve this Blair quote: “Dissent seven years ago was: Reduce immigration, Islam is bad, preserve our culture, and we stand against the left.” “Dissent now is: Here’s why Hitler was right, racism is natural and good, and leftists aren’t human.”
24 likes

AllegianceMountain
3 days ago
Only non-compromised and fully honest and fully insightful channel on Rumble. Blood of the Numenoreans and Eldar.
1 like

palacepony
Supporter
3 days ago
15 min based intro, followed by ..ongoing Tip-of-spear investigation of amyloidygenic potentials in P fiz er.. ..based outro; https://rumble.com/v5cgk62-the-block-chain-monad-asymmetric-war-against-bio-digital-convergence-the-bi.html
-1 likes

katana17
3 days ago
[Joel Davis – Wargaming the Response as Communists Organise Brown Parasites – Aug 22, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/08/24/joel-davis-wargaming-the-response-as-communists-organise-brown-parasites-aug-22-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: Joel introduces the show and mention it will cover Australian politics. Discussion of healthcare and hospitals, with Blair saying: “Most people are sitting in hospital because they smoke two packs of cigarettes a day for 25 years, drink every day, eat a lot of sugar, never exercise.” Critique of modern hospitals: “There’s no natural air, there’s no natural light. Um, it’s. There’s just beeping, just constant beeping.” Discussion of working with disadvantaged youth and why it can be demoralizing. “If I’m ugly, if I’m deranged, if I’m twisted, then everyone else needs to be too.” Critique of the medical industry: “The medical industry profits from keeping people sick.” Discussion of eugenics and selective breeding. “We dedicate so much effort to try to breed strong racehorses for the purposes of betting. But when someone mentions the concept of human eugenics and breeding a higher humanity, everybody gets offended.” Talk about incels and sterilizing worldviews. “I assumed that you had to have a license to have children.” Discussion of marriage and the church’s role historically. Introduction of the main topic: protests against refugee encampments. Description of recent nationalist counter-protest: “We did a Nazi rally and we even broke our own rules. We used profanity.” “We want Normie white masses looking at the neo-Nazis and going, ‘Fuck, yeah, that’s what we want!’” Discussion of media coverage and public reaction to their protests. “We have the best grandmas.” Talk about the value of street activism and creating dramatic scenes. Discussion of potential future ….
1 like

Delete
‹ Hide 1 reply
Corndiesel11
Supporter
3 days ago
I thought this was the entire transcript of the last episode
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
katana17
3 days ago
The entire transcript, (along with many more transcripts) with images is at the link I gave above and here: https://katana17.com/2024/08/24/joel-davis-wargaming-the-response-as-communists-organise-brown-parasites-aug-22-2024-transcript/
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top