Joel Davis: We are live another episode of the show and to start us off. Superchat from Death Culture saying for the NSN war chest. And yeah, we’re getting straight into it. Big show for you this evening. Blair wasn’t around last week, so we’ve got a bit to catch up on. A lot to break down in international politics. Interesting, interesting stuff to cover.

There’s been a bit of a theme over recent weeks which is kind of going to continue into this episode.

But yeah, I want to reflect upon what’s happened in this Israel, Iran situation because on one level nothing happened, which was my prediction, but on a deeper level, something is going to happen, for many, many reasons, which we will get into in the broader situation. Interesting stuff as well in Australian politics. Mark Latham going to war against Chris Minns in New South Wales over these Hate Speech laws and the role of the jewish lobby and so on. Interesting to discuss that among other things.

But before we get into it. How you doing, Blair? You came for the show this evening?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man! Got a lot I want to ask you. Get your take on a few things.

As you said, there’s been some international politics, which is not my favourite kind of politics, but I’d still like to get a comprehensive understanding. To get a bit of a Joel Davis take a series of Joel Davis takes on what’s been going on. But I’ve got an early start in the morning, that’s why., … Sorry.

Joel Davis: I was going to say you. It seems like you’ve had a bit to say about this as well.

Blair Cottrell: So, yeah, my takes are kind of, …

Joel Davis: Interesting to get your breakdown.

Blair Cottrell: I haven’t really had the opportunity to really read into it and develop a full understanding. I’m kind of just going with my gut. I’m surprised the way it turned out. Like Trump shouldn’t have been able to bomb another country and then two days later step in to supervise a peace deal with the country he just bombed. Like on paper that shouldn’t be possible, but he somehow pulled that off. He did that. I don’t know how Trump makes stuff like that work, but I don’t know. He’s an interesting individual. We’ve discussed that on previous shows.

But yeah, like I was saying, I’ve got a really early start in the morning, so I asked Joel if we could start a little bit earlier. That’s why we’re kicking off just after 8:00.

But yeah, lots to discuss. Should be a good stream. Where do we want to start now? Is Joel coming through blurry for anyone else or is that just me? I might have to have a look at my Internet connection here. We’re both coming through clear here. Or Joel’s blurry. What are you guys seeing at home?

Joel Davis: Not seeing much in the chat either way. Yeah, we got blurry. Yeah. Well, I think it’s a connection issue. One second. You can entertain the crowd.

Blair Cottrell: It’s getting a little better.

Joel Davis: Entertain the crowd.

Blair Cottrell: It’s pretty clear now. Warm up the warm up the device, I suppose. Man, it’s cold times down here in Australia. Middle of winter.

Joel Davis: Yeah, it has been cold. And on the subject of seasons, that was going to be one of the themes for the episode this evening for me, because one thing that I have learnt in politics, politics works by season. So, like, for example there’s been big riots and protests in the United States recently. I remember around this time last year, there were big riots in the UK, race riots. Because it’s the summertime in the Northern Hemisphere, those kinds of things tend to only happen in summer. Down here in Australia, it’s winter. During the winter time period, not much is happening politically, everyone kind of switches off, hunker down. And Australian politics generally, I mean, it’s not that eventful at the best of times, but it’s especially not eventful during winter.

And I think that’s true across the board. I remember last year, it did kind of feel like things were a little stagnant through the winter time. And then as soon as we got into the springtime, all of a sudden it was all action. There was just rallies all the time and controversies. And it felt like there was a lot of forward pressure into the summertime. You know, a lot happened on Australia Day and so on around then through the summertime, momentum built up and expressed itself.

Then there’s all these legal cases that are upon us and we move into the wintertime and kind of hunker back down. That seems to be how it works in politics.

So a lot of people are pressuring us:

“When is the political party going to be launched? When’s the political party going to be launched?”

Well, it actually wouldn’t make sense to launch it in the wintertime. Would make a hell of a lot more sense to launch it at the complete opposite time of the year when there’s a lot more energy and there’s a lot more vitality in the people and in politics.

So at the moment, we’re on our kind of winter kind of lull down here in Australia, but internationally things are kicking off. And yeah, I think the biggest story obviously is its the to and fro between Israel and Iran, which came to an abrupt halt. Obviously last weekend you had, remember looking at my phone, Sunday morning we had a Yuletide celebration and many of the boys, so we’re awake up, kind of like hungover from Yuletide festivities on the Saturday night, the winter solstice down here in Australia. We’re driving down to the servo and I pull my phone out and it’s like:

“Holy shit, Trump just bombed Iran!”

It was very quick. Like, it was like Trump announced it on Truth Social, his social media site, before anyone else touched it.

[06:13]

Blair Cottrell: Do you use that, Truth Social?

Joel Davis: It seems like only Trump uses it and maybe, I guess his biggest supporters.

But anyway, I had to go on his Truth Social and check, is this real? It was real. And he was, he kind of had this tone of like:

“All right, we’ve blown up the nuclear sites, this is done. If Iran stands down, we’ll just call it sweet, we’ll move on.”

And in the days since, you know, reports came out saying:

“Well, I don’t think they really effectively took out their nuclear program.”

Israel were talking a lot tougher. Even Trump himself was talking a lot tougher, talking about regime change. Iran were claiming they were going to have a big retaliation. Then Iran did a symbolic retaliation immediately. We’re getting a ceasefire, apparently. And Trump somehow even seemed to restrain Israel, which surprised a lot of analysts, where apparently there was a loose Iranian missile that was a bit late, just kind of missed the cut-off point for the ceasefire, allegedly, or whatever.

And so Israel sent all their jets. And then you see Trump coming out saying:

“Israel doesn’t know what the fuck it’s doing!”

To the world media, and making all these posts on his social media saying the Israeli planes can just wave hello and then they’re going to turn around and fly home. Don’t bomb anyone. We’re having a ceasefire. It was kind of interesting political theatre, but it managed to hold. And in the days since, it’s been kind of interesting. Trump has been very supportive of Israel, supportive of Benjamin Netanyahu, but at the same time ignores the intelligence reports that say that the nuclear sites weren’t properly destroyed. Says that’s all fake news. They’ve relaxed sanctions on Iran after the so-called ceasefire, but no negotiation seems to have taken place. There’s no deal. Iran has left the IAEA, which is the world leading kind of body or whatever for inspecting nuclear sites.

So what’s the solution here exactly? Like, it seems like the cans just being kicked down the road, but nothing’s actually been resolved.

Now, I personally don’t think it’s a problem if Iran gets nuclear weapons. In fact, I’m totally cool with them getting nuclear weapons. And I don’t think that it’s could be a problem that we deal with. But obviously from the perspective of Trump and the Zionists who control America, that’s a big problem. And from the perspective of Israel, it’s a big problem. So it’s kind of surprising to see that.

And a lot of people said:

“Well, how come that happened?”

And the reason why I was predicting that this kind of something like this would happen from the very beginning was not because I don’t think Zionists control America or I don’t think the jews have the levers of power. Quite the opposite. Obviously. The reason why I predicted this was because the United States has got more issues right now than just Iran and Israel.

Back in 2003, when the United States invaded Iraq, America was by far the world’s most powerful country. The richest, strongest. No one came close to the United States in 2003. And no one dared challenge the international order and their power and authority basically anywhere in the world. Like Russia and China totally like acquiesced to the invasion of Iraq and said:

“Okay, do it.”

So America was able to just break international law, do whatever it wanted, obviously at the behest of Israel at the time, and get away with it and just flush trillions of dollars down the toilet and deploy all its military, and nothing happened.

However, today it’s a very different global situation. You’ve got an active war in Ukraine, Russia’s committed there. And Trump came in to the presidency trying to come to some kind of peace deal there to neutralise relations with the Russians in order to be able to pivot to China, which is the real big deal. China is obviously potential superpower, a rising peer competitor of the United States. And there’s the issue of Taiwan, where if China moves on Taiwan, that could trigger World War Three, where the United States is obligated to defend Taiwan to hold together its position in the East Asian region.

Then you’ve got China versus America, two most powerful countries in the world. That’s World War Three. So what happens if America goes in and invades China, Iran right now? Well, they completely ruined their negotiating position with the Russians in Ukraine.

And they also are basically inviting the Chinese, like:

“Hey, why don’t you just invade Taiwan right now because we’re over committed and you’re never going to get a golden opportunity like this.”

So I think because of that broader situation, even though of course the jews who run America are no fans of Iran, there’s a limitation on what they can do. And I think that’s what we saw just happen.

And so the reason why nothing happened this time is because a much larger happening is on the horizon, I think it’s basically inevitable that a much larger war will occur over the next few years.

Blair Cottrell: Well, I was going to ask you. And you already answered the question I was going to ask you. Obviously this back and forth between Iran and Israel isn’t going to become a World War Three situation. It’s not a broad scale war. It’s kind of petty, a bit of a nothing burger. That’s what it turned out to be anyway. And you rightfully sort of predicted that, or not really predicted it, but you just called it for what it was before anybody else did, as far as I can tell.

So what is the World War III situation? Does that have to involve China and Taiwan? Is that your perspective?

[12:00]

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, now if things flare up again between Iran and Israel, which seems inevitable because there isn’t much of a conclusion here to what’s happened, that could invite the Chinese in, they get to make a move.

Blair Cottrell: What about the other way around? If China tries something with Taiwan and America’s tied up in that, then I suppose hostilities could flare up between Iran and Israel again because they would expect the Americans to be distracted by whatever’s happening.

Joel Davis: Well, that would maybe play in Iran’s favour, you would think, because they would think, oh well, Israel’s now undefended. But what Israel showed, I think, in this engagement was that it has a military dominance over Iran, like of the two sides, the Iranians took a lot more damage than Israel. And there’s a thousand miles between two countries. Very difficult for either country to conduct a proper war with one another, whether there’s actually fighting on the ground, which is why historically Iran has been kind of backing Hezbollah and things like that. Groups that are actually bordering with the United States. Sorry, with Israel!

But it’s kind of like a sideshow. You know, the deeper and more profound reality is America versus China. And there’s two very interesting historians that have co written a few books together. One of them is dead now and what is coined as the Strauss Howe generational theory. I’ve been reading a book called the Fourth Turning, which was co-authored by these two historians in the late 90s. They have a kind of generational theory of American history where they say:

“Well, in order to understand history, you have to kind of understand it through the prism of every 21 years or so.”

Generations emerge and kind of swap social roles, whether they be the children, the young adults, the midlife types or the elderly.

And as each generational shift happens, there’s a shift in mood and a paradigm shift basically in the overarching society. And they plot this onto Anglo-American history. And what they find is that they kind of come in fours. There’s kind of like a cycle of four generations, which makes up the average kind of lifespan of a healthy human being. And how basically every kind of lifespan every 85 years or so in American history, or even going back into British history prior to that, you get a crisis.

And so you had World War II about 85 years before that you had the Civil War about 85 years before that you had the American Revolutionary war about 85 years before that you had the Glorious Revolution in Britain where Stuart monarchy was deposed. And there’s a huge paradigm shift at the time and so on. And you keep kind of cycling back and finding these parallels. And so according to this theory, which is eerily accurate in a lot of its predictions and its analyses, basically now between the next few years is supposed to be the kind of crescendo of the crisis point where something like a World War II or Civil War type level happening is supposed to occur in American history.

And at the same time as you have this theory, there’s also many theorists of war history who describe how you have these 95 to 100 year cycles, roughly speaking, that occur between kind of wars that reset the global political order that have been occurring every 90, 95 years or so throughout European history.

And again, we’re kind of reaching that point where the next, …

Blair Cottrell: So we’re overdue.

Joel Davis: Well, we’re basically, if it happens soon, we’re right on time. We’re right on time. And it does feel like there’s this kind of air of inevitability where you know, you have something called Thucydides Trap. Thucydides was an ancient Greek historian. He wrote about Peloponnesian War. He wrote about the war between Athens and Sparta.

And basically you have this situation where this tendency in military history and political history where you’ll have a dominant power in a region or in this case in the world that’ll enjoy after a great victory in a major war, a period of dominance.

And then eventually they’ll have somewhat of a decline and a new challenger will arise, a new great power will arise, and the status quo that was kind of set up under the dominance of the original power will eventually be challenged by this emerging new power because they’ll become too powerful to basically accept the subordinate position. And when this occurs, it’s basically inevitable that these two powers will go to war. And it’s almost like all throughout human history, you see this happen again and again and again and again!

In the early 20th century, you saw basically the dominance of the British Empire, the rise of Germany. They challenge one another. America ends up inheriting the position of the British and finishing the job. But you see this time and time again. And that’s obviously what’s happening now with China, where in the last, you know, few decades, China has become so wealthy, has had so much growth, and they’re building incredible amounts of military hardware, their navy’s swelling, all their tech is developing very rapidly, like military tech. And from the Chinese perspective, Taiwan is part of China.

In fact, from, even from the American perspective, technically, Taiwan is part of China. Everyone agrees because Taiwan was actually controlled by China. After the Second World War concluded, where you had an alliance between the Nationalists and the Communists to fight the Japanese in China. The Nationalists and the Communists started fighting one another. The Communists won. The Nationalists basically were pushed back onto the island of Taiwan and they basically were stuck there ever since. And the Americans initially protected the Nationalists from the Chinese and had the ambition perhaps of like, reinvading China and putting the Nationalists back in power over the Communists, but that never happened.

And so basically it’s like this Chinese civil war that was never fully resolved. So from China’s perspective, like America deciding it would be like imagining if we had a war in Australia between the Left and the Right, and then the losing group had got exiled to Tasmania, we would still consider Tasmania part of Australia. Whoever won would want Tasmania back. And if then America.

[19:18]

Blair Cottrell: How did China end up losing control?

Joel Davis: You’re not allowed to invade Tasmania. That’s against the rules. We would be like, cool. Like fuck you!

Blair Cottrell: But how did China lose Taiwan in the first place?

Joel Davis: Well, the Nationalists, Taiwan is controlled by Chinese people as well, but they’re just the Nationalist group that were pushed out by the Communists. But they’re ethnically Chinese.

Blair Cottrell: Exclusive political structure.

Joel Davis: Yeah, but like, Taiwan has been conquered by other powers throughout history. Like, it was conquered by the Japanese at one point, it was conquered by the Portuguese at one point and so on. But Taiwan is more or less Chinese.

Blair Cottrell: Well, I had a couple of feelings regarding Donald Trump. Just paying attention to his body language, his speeches.

I feel like he has Israel fatigue. I feel like Trump is kind of fed up with Israel. And someone in the comments triggered that thought in me. I noticed that in Trump. I noticed that in his demeanor. It feels like he’s annoyed by Israel. He’s sick of Israel, but he doesn’t really openly admit it. He’s still playing the game, but he definitely seems frustrated. More frustrated with Israel than he was by Iran, I think. But he’s still trying to make it seem like he’s kind of equally annoyed by both of them, probably a little bit more by Iran, because nuclear bombs or whatever.

But I also got the sensation that isn’t Donald Trump just a stereotypical merchant? I’m not saying nations should be at war with each other, but it is a natural thing. And Trump mentioned many times, why can’t they just go back to trading? They’re excellent trading. Iran great trading. Not traitors as in betraying, but trading like buying and selling.

And it’s like a merchant, the big international merchants stepping in and saying:

“Hey, guys, stop killing each other. There’s money to be made. Don’t you guys want to make money? Let’s just keep trading and getting rich. Use your population to generate more wealth and start trading those resources. Why fight for something you believe in when you can make money?”

That’s kind of how it felt, right? They were the feelings that I had observing Trump’s reaction to this whole debacle between those two nations.

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think that’s an accurate assessment.

Also, Trump does have this tendency to kind of do some big individual military action, like where he does like a big, well publicized bombing or something, and then goes, all right, let’s negotiate a piece. Trump is very averse to long drawn out wars.

But I think it’s also because I think Trump and his people are aware of what I was describing about China. And their entire strategy seems to be trying to get the affairs in order of the empire broadly, so that they’re able to focus on the threat of China, because that’s why Trump is going easy on the Russians and why he’s trying to come to the table with Putin and make a deal where Biden was not looking at doing that. Not because Trump is some Russian agent or something. I don’t think you could argue that he’s a jewish agent, but you can’t argue that he’s a Russian agent. I don’t think there’s evidence for that.

But the reason why he’s doing that is because of pragmatism. It’s just simply the assessment that if you’re going to go to war with China, you don’t also want to have the Russians on the side of the Chinese against you and fight on two fronts. You’d rather neutralise the Russians so that you can take on the Chinese directly. And that’s kind of what he’s trying to do. He’s trying to kind of change the state of play. And Israel is just a thorn in his side because Israel is just focused upon Israel’s narrow individual interests,

Blair Cottrell: Ethnocentric interests.

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course, of course. And for Israel, this is a golden opportunity. Israel have been pretty successful in their conflict with Hamas. They were successful against Hezbollah in their recent battle. The Assad regime fell in Syria.

So all these dominoes are falling all around them. And it’s like, now there’s. Now they’ve got the chance to go and try and force the issue on Iran. They’ve got their guy Trump in office who they think they can get something out of because they’ve got leverage over him. He’s embedded in all these jewish power structures.

You know, I remember when we talked about it on the show a few weeks ago when there was discussion about Trump and Epstein, because it was brought up. Oh, what happened here?

Blair Cottrell: You lost your camera by the look.

All right, well, I’m expecting Joel to be back momentarily. Here he is. Seems to be having some technical issues, and I’m not sure I have. The mental acurity. Is acurity a word.q

What I’m trying to say is I don’t believe I have the necessary knowledge to follow on with that point. I just can’t see your face. I can hear you, but I can’t see you.

[24:33]

Joel Davis: What the fuck is going on? One second. Yeah, it’s mental acuity.

Blair Cottrell: Acuity. Right, right. I always have the right word in my memory bank. But A, I don’t actually know what it means, and B, I often mispronounce it, but the word is in the bank. It’s the strangest thing. It’s like well, why do I know the right word to use if I can’t even be sure of what it means? Words often sound like what you want them to mean. What I mean is words mean what they sound like they mean. Have you found that with English? That’s what I think.

Anyway. What I’m saying is sometimes I’m thinking and the right words just come to me and I don’t know why that happens. Sometimes I don’t even know what they mean. And that’s an example of that right there.

But anyway, you’re back now, so continue. What was it you were saying?

Joel Davis: Oh, what I was saying was that this was discussed when Elon Musk had his flame out against Trump a few weeks ago and then mentioned that:

“Well, why do you think the Epstein files haven’t been released? Well, it’s because they implicate Trump.”

Or whatever it was that he said. I don’t remember the words exactly. Well, there’s something to that because Trump and Epstein were like best buddies from the late 80s to the early 2000s. All these videos of them partying together.

In fact, Epstein even described Trump as one of his best friends in an interview in the 90s. Trump said many great things, positive things about Jeffrey Epstein, including:

“Jeffrey Epstein. You know, he’s got a he loves the women, particularly those on the younger side. He’s a lot like me.”

Blair Cottrell: Is that what he actually said?

Joel Davis: Something like that. Okay, yeah.

I can’t remember the exact quote, but it was something words to that effect. I can look it up.

But the reason why they fell out in the mid 2000s. I shared a really good post on this by Devon Stack, also known as Black Pilled, was because Jeffrey Epstein was trying to buy some mansion in Florida somewhere like Palm beach or something, and Trump outbid him and got the place off him. And it ruined their friendship. Jeffrey was pissed off that Trump screwed him on some deal, took this place that he wanted to buy. And they fell out because of that. Not because Trump realised that he was a pedo or something or that he was a Mossad agent. Trump’s family have been long time friends of the jews. His dad was massive business partner to the jews. All kinds of awards from the jewish community in New York and guys that were doing the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing before Jeffrey Epstein were close friends of the Trump family and so on.

So this connection between Trump and Israel goes beyond just money. It wasn’t like Trump just got bought out by Zionist owners. The connection goes much deeper and much further.

But my point being that, yes, even though Trump is a massive philo-semite and a supporter of Israel. You know what Israel are asking for at the moment is go and start a war that could potentially destroy the entire American empire. Because we would like you to. It’s not actually necessary. Like if Iran gets nuclear weapons, they’re not going to use them against Israel unless Israel shoot them at them first. Like Israel has 200 nukes. Like Iran’s not going to just start lobbing nukes crazily at Israel and get itself nuked into oblivion just because they’re angry anti-semites or whatever the fuck they’re saying.

Blair Cottrell: It would give Iran leverage obviously though, right?

Joel Davis: Yeah, it would basically protect them. It would deter Israel or America or whatever from fucking with them in the way that they just did, but to a larger degree in a way that could actually destabilise the regime there. So it’s just an act of self defense the fact that if they were to build nuclear weapons, so it’s ridiculous!

And then Israel’s complaining about Iran not following certain protocols. Israel hasn’t even formally acknowledged that it has nuclear weapons even though it has 200. Everyone knows that they have about 200 nukes. Those nuclear weapons were illegally stolen off the United States. There’s a lot of, is a lot of credible evidence that the reason why JFK was assassinated was because he was trying to stop Israel getting nuclear weapons. He was an opponent of their nuclear program. He didn’t want them getting nuclear weapons. And then look what happened to him.

And then Israel is not a signatory to the non-Proliferation Treaty. Pretty much every country in the world in the 60s and the 70s there was a decision made, okay, we’ve got to like stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons around the world. Obviously it was a bit of gate-keeping by the Soviet Union and the United States, but they were saying let’s stop, let’s shut down nuclear testing. This could be really bad for the environment. It slowed the proliferation of nuclear weapons and most of the countries in the world have signed up to it. Israel never signed it and Iran did. Iran has signed it.

So they’re trying to hold Iran to account for rules that they refuse to adhere to. It’s just insane! Like it’s the chutzpah of these kikes. So it isn’t necessary. Like from Israel’s standpoint they’re just greedy. They’re just like, they can see their enemy is in a weak position. They’ve knocked out a lot of its or kind of defeated groups like Hezbollah. They’ve knocked out Assad’s regime in Syria, which is an ally of Iran.

[30:17]

And so now they’re just trying to take a swing for the throat or they think they’ve got a chance. And Trump’s like:

“Fuck! Like, this is the last thing I need right now!”

He had like 5 million people in the streets protesting his presidency the other day. There’s the beanner anti-deportation riots happening. This happens. And then so many Trump allies, like Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon and so on, come out against Trump, against the war.

And a lot of the base, a lot of the people who support Trump, like what Tucker Carlson is saying, like what Steve Bannon is saying, like what even further Right commentators, people like Nick Fuentes, whatever, what these people are saying, Alex Jones. A lot of big commentators in the United States came out against this and the people were with them, particularly young people. So, it’s politically a disaster for Trump, but then also it’s geopolitically just like the last thing that they need right now.

And then, not to mention economically, like, if they went to war with Iran because of what it would do to oil prices and so on, it could completely fuck up the economy in a very serious way. So there’s just like this cascading set of crises that would be unleashed by it, which is why he was keen to just try and get it over and done with and move on and re-establish the status quo that previously existed. Because it’s kind of like a nightmare situation, no matter how much he loves Israel.

And I think that’s why what happened, happened. But it will probably flare up again before the end of the year because Israel is going to force the issue. Iran, I mean, they’re probably trying to make nuke secretly now. I saw a good article written by someone, I can’t remember who it was. I sent it to you like the other day.

Blair Cottrell: I know you did. I know which one you’re going to reference.

Joel Davis: Yeah, like the one saying, obviously Kim Jong Un and the North Koreans have indicated, just build your nuke secretly and then test them and then flex your muscles because no one will touch you because North Korea’s got a bunch of nuclear weapons pointed at South Korea. Matter how much international condemnation there is of their regime, people just accept that it’s just, it exists and there’s nothing you can do about it. And that’s probably what Iran should do and what they’re probably going to try and do.

And apparently they’ve still got some of the reports that came out were saying that they’ve still got a lot of enriched uranium hidden somewhere, that they’ve still got reactors hidden, like hidden in other places that weren’t blown up, or that the Fordo site wasn’t destroyed properly, etc, etc.

So what happens in three or four months when the Israelis and other war hawks for war with Iran start leaking things to the press saying Iran are building nukes and they’ve rebuilt one of these nuclear sites or whatever? Like, Trump can call it fake news now, but, like, he probably will respond to that kind of pressure.

And so then what if, you know, Israel kick it off again, then what? Seems hard to imagine this situation would just magically go away.

Blair Cottrell: Do you think jewish people have overplayed the Holocaust card? Because I noticed that Netanyahu, in his speech justifying his initial attack on Iran, he said something to the effect of, we can’t allow Iran to nuclear Holocaust us. And then I read an article that was published by Sky News from the, I believe, CEO, who was it? The CEO of the Australian jewish association or something? I think it’s probably just a guy at a desk. It’s nothing serious. But he was published by Sky News. And in the article, I’m pretty sure he mentions Holocaust like five or six times. And I’m thinking, and I didn’t actually read the article, I just wanted to count how many times he mentioned the Holocaust. And I’m thinking, am I the only one doing this, or am I the only one so worn down by the overuse of the Holocaust term because of the politics that I’ve been into? Or is everyone starting to feel this way? Is everybody starting to notice? I don’t know if this is something that people could relate to, but it’s just the justification for everything.

Remember that journalists, the Australian journalist, I think he was from ABC perhaps, who interviewed that spokesperson from Israel and said:

“So Israel is allowed to have nuclear warheads because Holocaust?”

And the spokesperson got really offended and actually walked out of the interview. He’s like, you’re being disrespectful. I’m not doing this interview, right?

So I can’t be the only one that’s noticing it. If even ABC journalists are noticing it. Like ABC journalists, I think, are notorious Leftists in Australia. People don’t like them very much. They’re generally very politically biased and even they’re sick of Israel. Jewish people just using Holocaust to justify everything and anything. What do you think? Do you think the general public, the population, do you think for them the Holocaust is starting to become a bit of an eye roll.

[35:14]

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think you’re seeing it more with Leftists. They’re dismissing the Holocaust. Not that they’re not denying that it happened part. They’re dismissing it on the issue of Israel. I saw a clip from, I think it was Piers Morgan show and Piers Morgan has kind of been inviting on, he’s kind of seeking out controversy with his show. He’ll invite on people that will often debate the Israel-Palestine issue from both sides and he’ll try to interview like Andrew Tate or people like that because he’s going for clicks.

And anyway, I can’t remember who the jew was, but they had Anna Kasperian, I think her name is. She’s on the Young Turks program. She’s like Left leaning, like Bernie Sanders, supporting Democrat, but obviously she’s anti-Israel. And her rhetoric. I’ve noticed, I’ve seen quite a few clips from her and she’s a pretty popular commentator in the United States on the Left. Her rhetoric has gone to like full on like ZOG, like it’s a Zionist Occupied Government. Israel control our government. It’s not just, oh, these Christians and White supremacists hate brown people or whatever or these crazy Christians with this insane biblical theories about Israel. It’s like a direct, like Israel, the Mossad, they control our government. What’s going on with Jeffrey Epstein, you know, blah, blah, blah. Talking points that you would hear on the far-Right from people that we associate with. Right on that specific issue.

And anyway, the jew, she was debating about whether what’s happening in is in Gaza constitutes a genocide or something like that. He brought up the Holocaust and he’s saying this is not a real genocide. Real genocides are like the Holocaust. Like that’s a real genocide and that’s what happened to our people. And she was like, shut the fuck up! I’m sick of hearing about the Holocaust. How you guys just keep using that. I don’t care about the fucking Holocaust anymore. You’re doing a fucking genocide now! And that’s kind of interesting. You’re seeing that sentiment more from Leftists.

And then at the same time was a great exchange between Senator Gerard Rennick and some jew on Twitter that I posted a screenshot of the other day. The jew said:

“My family was wiped out in the Holocaust and for over 2,000 years my people were persecuted everywhere they went!”

Blah, blah, blah.

And then he just kind of shot back with:

“I have Celtic heritage. We’ve been persecuted for 2,000 years since the Romans touched us up. Did we go on about it, no, no one cares about your claims of 2,000 years of persecution!”

So it was nice to see Rennick fire back too.

And so you’re seeing more emboldening from people that are., … Because the anti-zionist, anti-Israel position is now becoming dominant. Basically people under the age of 40, people who get their politics primarily from a media diet of social media rather than mainstream media. Most people are anti-zionists, whether they’re Left-wing or Right-wing. It’s the only thing both sides can seemingly agree on at this point is fuck Israel basically. And yeah, so I think you’re onto something with that. I don’t think the Holocaust is really kind of maintaining the same kind of mystique that it once had.

Blair Cottrell: No, I mean, I’m seeing people who I know, clients, relatives of clients. Like I’ll be in the middle of a job and one of my clients will say:

“Oh, my brother just sent me this.”

Because we talk about politics in a light hearted way.

And it’s like a meme, you know the Jaws movie, how there’s a picture of the shark kind of looking up at the I think it’s a woman, or a man swimming on the surface of the water and someone’s just changed the shark to a giant nose and it’s jews instead of Jaws. And he’s like showing it to me, laughing at me, sorry, laughing with me about it. And I’m thinking, this wouldn’t have happened five or six years ago. This is the sort of thing you would only find on Telegram five or six years ago. Now it’s just everywhere and standard people are laughing about it. This kind of anti-semitic meme propaganda.

So I’m not sure where that’s going long term.

However, I did have a thought. I believe it was yesterday or the day before. I started thinking about why we were censored from X. And I shared my thoughts with you on this briefly as well yesterday, I think. To summarize, I said if all this stuff is allowed on X, all of this, like Nazi material, anti-semitic memes and so forth, then why are we banned? Like, what does that say?

Basically, I realised that it’s probably part of a deliberate system to ban the options, because regular people, it’s always effective for regular people to start changing their opinions in favour of what we stand for. Obviously that’s effective, but it’s only effective up to a certain point because people, at the end of the day, they need to do something with that opinion, they need someone to vote for or they need a group to join, they need a party to join, they need to start paying a membership for an organisation, they need to get involved or they need to at least vote for someone who has a bit of a plan. But if they remove all the people with a plan, if they delete the options, then it doesn’t matter what kind of content people are exposed to. If they can’t do anything with the opinions that content is forming in their minds, then it doesn’t, it just doesn’t matter. It doesn’t actually translate into real or affecting real political change.

And I think that’s the whole point behind the censorship, at least. What do you think? Because you’ve got people like Nick Fuentes, they’re still allowed on X and there’s other influences and podcasters and so forth. But that kind of ties into what I’m saying, because what are they doing to affect political change? They’re sitting in a studio just talking shit, which is fine. It doesn’t really solve any problems, does it? It doesn’t give people options.

But anyone who comes forward as a real option, representing a real new nationalist solution, a new political party that’s actually going to challenge the two party hamster wheel in your respective country or region, then you’re banned, then you’re censored in clusters, all of your colleagues were involved, everyone LinkedIn gets banned at the same time, usually at the request of the hamster wheel two party system in your respective region. What do you think about that? Do you reckon that’s what’s going on?

[41:55]

Joel Davis: No, definitely, I think, yeah. Basically everyone who tries to set up a proper organisation, a party in particular, that people can rally behind, we all got mass banned only when we started making noise that we’re going to start a political party. And I don’t think that’s a coincidence. It was partly because we were gaining kind of lift off with popular resonance and things like that as well.

But yeah, you notice a similar thing in Britain. I’ve seen a similar thing, you know, where like all the Patriotic Alternative guys all got banned all at once when they had some successful public action.

Blair Cottrell: That’s the thing, they’re an option. It doesn’t matter what people’s opinions are if they can’t vote for someone or join some group that’s presenting themselves as an option, a solution. So if the options are banned, I think that’s the game. So everything just becomes content for the sake of content where you’re just scrolling your X feed and you’re seeing all these great funny, Nazi, anti-semitic memes, but there’s no one you can actually, you can laugh with your friends about it and stuff, but you can still only vote for Liberal or Labor. There’s still no known organisation that you can actually join because you don’t know about anything like that going on. Because everyone who represents anything like that gets censored instantly.

And I think that’s the way censorship will continue to pan out moving forward. Plenty of memes, plenty of content, but you’ll just be expected to sit there drooling on yourself, consuming that content, and there won’t actually be an option for you, despite your changing opinion.

Joel Davis: Yeah, so they don’t mind people talking about the problems, but they don’t want anyone putting forward an actual solution.

Blair Cottrell: What’s changed though? Because they used to hate people talking about the problems. You used to be banned instantly for even trying to bring the problem up.

So why suddenly don’t they care about people? It might be that they’ve realised people need that option. And without the option, it doesn’t actually matter what people talk about or what they consume.

Joel Davis: I think it’s just that the ability for the powers that be to impose the level of censorship that they were getting away with a few years ago has declined.

There’s been a resurgence in the value of freedom of speech. They overstepped the mark. They started going after in America in particular, where all these platforms are run out of, they started going after conservatives, like main mainline conservatives that are not even that radical.

I mean, they banned Trump from Twitter for fuck sake. They banned like a sitting president from the platform. So they overstepped the mark.

And so then there was a course correction where the American Right asserted freedom of speech and asserted itself on these platforms. Elon Musk buys Twitter. They set up Rumble. The kind of information space gets shifted. Zuckerberg also kind of personally shifted more to the Right.

And so this TikTok which has run out of China, there was a changing landscape that emerged that these sites were forced to adapt to.

But at the end of the day, when it comes to Australia or Europe or even I think in America where I saw examples of this, like I remember when the National Justice Party existed in the United States, like they all got banned and then you couldn’t even post, like at this, at this point, you can’t actually post our website on Twitter.

But I remember that that was true for their website as well. So they really target.

Blair Cottrell: That’s your White Australia website, is that right?

Joel Davis: Correct. White Australia.org or WhiteAus.org, both are banned.

Blair Cottrell: What happens when that party actually gets registered? Well, then can it still be targeted for censorship to that degree? Where we can actually be posted on a public social media platform where there’s millions of Australians are joined up to that platform.

I mean, they talk about election interference through social media, but that’s exactly what these social media companies do against anyone, you know, right of centre. Usually the greatest election interference is happening amongst X staff right now.

But yeah, as I said, it ties back into the sort of perspective that I had over the last couple of days that the whole agenda is to ban the options, is to let people just talk about whatever they want now. To give people the illusion of freedom of speech. But nothing that they can actually do with that freedom of speech that’s going to affect the course of politics in their region. Sit there and watch some streamer, say some stuff about Hitler and wring your hands together and feel good inside about it, laugh about it, get excited about it, but then you still got to go vote for red or blue.

At the end of the day, that’s all there is. Anybody else presenting anything else, especially nationalistic, in essence, they get nuked, they get censored, and I think that’s the way the system will slug on forward into the future.

[47:11]

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I can imagine like say we have World War III against China. I could imagine the system being allowing a lot of anti-Chinese racism to profligate online and in fact encouraging it and having propagandists that frame the war in terms most amenable to people like you and I actually support a war with China. I don’t support starting one, but I support it if it’s necessary. I support trying to win if it happens.

Blair Cottrell: Obviously.

Joel Davis: And so that could be a good opportunity for us. But like there’s going to be times where, like racism is valuable for many reasons. Like they obviously allowed people like us to run amok on the site in the lead up to the last American election because they’re trying to get Trump in and they knew that the more swastikas and sunrads that were posted on Twitter, there’d be more votes for Trump with young people and it worked. So they try to channel racism for their own ends. It’s the most powerful force in politics. So it doesn’t surprise me at all!

Blair Cottrell: It’s the most powerful force in the world. Racism. Racism is kind of the precondition for the development of all living things, isn’t it? It’s like woven into nature that surrounds us. Like, racism is probably the most foundational reality of this physical plane where we live. It’s the basis for all life. You don’t see any magpies running around pursuing crows because they want to be more diverse. But yeah, I can understand that. Racism is obvious, obviously leverage, but it’s done in a smart way.

I don’t like to believe that I’m just playing into the agenda of American, you know, political brains, though. I mean, all I was doing essentially on X was, I suppose, supporting and trying to legitimize. I mean, I’m part of an agenda as well. I’m part of a political agenda. It’s quite obvious the agenda I’m part of I like to think that I’m part of a good agenda. I’m trying to popularise and legitimize the White Australia movement. Right. I believe that there’s nothing wrong with being a White Australian.

And I think that could become a popular talking point in the future, especially when White Australians start becoming a minority or when things get so bad that you can’t go down to a shopping centre without potentially being raped or stabbed by a coloured migrant from Africa. Already we’re dawning on that reality now.

So the agenda I’m part of, because I’m part of it. I’m not directly linked in, I’m not an active member, but because I’m someone with a voice people listen to and I was creating content to try to translate what you guys were doing for the ordinary viewer. Well, that’s enough reason for me to also be taken out with the rest of the guys in censorship. You know, it’s frustrating because you know what? I won’t get into it. I’m not going to sook about censorship because if I was in control, I’d be censoring my enemies as well, straight up. I wouldn’t be giving people ideas.

Joel Davis: Need to figure out how to adapt. That’s why it’s important that people clip and re-upload the show, for example, and re-upload stuff that we post. When Blair posts a video on Telegram or whatever, re-upload it on other sites, enable our voice to keep getting out there regardless. That’s invaluable to circumvent the censorship that we’re under.

But also we just have to adapt. I think building the political party will give us strong standing to get back on a lot of these sites and to normalise ourselves in.

Blair Cottrell: The thing that irritates me most about it is just the whole concept of democracy. I would be more satisfied with this whole ordeal if the Australian government, the people within Australian government just came out and said:

“Hey, we’re not allowing these opinions. We’re censoring certain opinions. We’re banning certain political ideologies. This is not a democracy anymore!”

I’ll be like, okay, at least I know where I stand. But they keep parroting bullshit and trying to present themselves as something that they’re not. You know, that they stand for these democratic principles that they don’t stand for. So they just lie to your face. While in reality there’s like counterinsurgency departments that exist purely to harass and censor political dissidents in this Australian democracy. And that’s what frustrates me so much, because you do your best to obey the law. You do your best to hold to the principles that you were raised to believe in the principles of being fair, diplomatic, you know, principle of free speech, not being violent, all that kind of stuff. You observe all of those rules, social boundaries and laws, and you still just don’t get any rights. It’s like you still just get censored, harassed, de-banked, followed. You get police knocking on your door, asking you about the political party you might be joining in the future. You know, it’s just a complete Police State down here in Australia.

And so it just pisses me off that they can’t just admit that that’s what they are. I suppose Chris Minns is the one who’s come closest to actually admitting it. The premier of New South Wales, he said that, hey, we can’t basically, can’t have free speech in this multicultural paradise because it might hurt feelings, and we can’t have that. So free speech is cancelled. He didn’t say it exactly like that, but that’s basically what he believes. I can respect that more than what some of those other assholes passing themselves off as politicians, whatever people’s representatives are actually presenting themselves. As actually still pretend that they’re living in some sort of democracy or are members of a democracy. There’s nothing Democratic about Australia. I don’t know. Do you agree, Joel? What do you think?

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, they pretend that we live in a liberal democracy.

[53:22]

Blair Cottrell: Before you chime in, sorry, I know I just passed it to you and I’m starting again. The real test will be whether or not you guys can actually register your political party and participate in this so-called democracy. You know, that’s going to be the real, the big reveal as to how free and Democratic this so-called Australian democracy is because I’ve got a feeling they’re not going to let you do it.

But with Chris Minns right now, I brought up Chris Minns, he’s under a bit of fire right now, isn’t he? Because his staffers have been called to account for their role in imposing new Hate Speech laws. Basically tampering with Australian law to make it more difficult to criticise jewish people. Changing vilification laws specifically I think all on the back of the caravan hoax.

But now his staffers actually refuse to show up to the initial inquiry, which they’ve got to show up to it I think if they’re summoned.

So the arrogance of Chris Minns’ office, the staffers in Chris Minns’ office has led to what I think might be potential arrests. What’s going on with that, Joel? Have Chris Minns’ staff has been arrested or are they going to be arrested? Do they have to come to court? What’s the next step there?

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what happened is that the, we talked about it on the show last week that there was the Legislative Council which is like the Upper House of the state government, they are doing an inquiry, an official inquiry into what happened because obviously the day that they’re passing these laws it’s coming out that this thing is a hoax and they’re ramming them through anyway. And we talked about it at the time.

Not only was it a hoax, it was literally paid for by foreign state actors, almost definitely Israel basically paying bikies to conduct false flag anti-semitic terrorist attacks to create a pretext to change laws to make it illegal to criticise jews or make it illegal for White people to criticise any minority groups basically in Australia.

Anyway, the role that Chris Minns’ staff has played is being subject to the inquiry because they’re alleging that they knew about it well ahead of time and deliberately concealed the fact that it was a hoax in order to ram this stuff through and only allowed it to kind of come to the surface after that successfully secured a passage through the state like the Legislative Council. Now it’s kind of become interesting because basically they subpoenaed them. They said you got to come and answer our questions. They refused to show up. They all refused to show up.

Blair Cottrell: So now it literally didn’t show up. They didn’t refuse. They didn’t write ahead and say:

“Hey, we’re not coming!”

They just didn’t even answer. There was just empty seats on the day.

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they’re still refusing to show up. So why, if they’ve got nothing to hide, why can’t they show up? Why can’t the members elected by the people ask them some questions about what they were doing? What are they trying to hide? Obviously something.

Blair Cottrell: And you know, Chris Minns was interviewed about it recently and he said:

“Disappointing, concerning and massive overreach for his staffers to have to actually explain why they tampered with Australian law on the back of a hoax.”

It’s disappointing, concerning and massive overreach to be held accountable for changing Australian laws on the back of a hoax. That’s what he said. Not word for word, but that’s what he was alluding to in an interview with a journalist. Imagine that. Imagine believing that you’re free from any accountability, that you can just pass laws based on lies and hoaxes behind the back of the Australian people.

And then when you’re held to account for it, oh, you’re a victim. This is massive overreach. This is disappointing. How dare you ask me to be to answer your questions. That was Chris Minns’ reaction and he’s been having a dig at Mark Latham too. I saw in a recent clip. Why is that? What role is Mark Latham played?

Joel Davis: So, yeah, I’ll get to that.

The bottom line is that they have no respect for law. Like legally they have to show up and answer questions if they’ve been subpoenaed. And they technically within the power to issue arrest warrants. They haven’t been issued yet. I think these things are being stalled because of the political connections between Chris Minns and the people that are ultimately responsible for issuing the warrants or not so Chris Minns is basically just trying to shut it down through favours and back room deals and so on. So we’ll see if that’s successful.

But yeah, the Liberal Party in New South Wales, they refused because initially guys like Mark Latham and some of the other Right-wing minor party members in New South Wales, they tried to push a motion to repeal the laws entirely in light of the revelations. The Liberal Party refused to help them do that. But the Liberal Party then agreed to doing an inquiry because Liberal Party knew it would create a shitstorm for Labor. Like what is happening now, which would be good for them in the polls but obviously they’re in the pocket of the jews. They don’t want to actually repeal the laws. It’s a typical Liberal Party where they pretend to be on our side but really complicit.

[59:01]

But anyway, obviously Mark Latham is Independent. He was on the One Nation ticket. He got kicked out of One Nation for rampant homophobia, for basically. Which was quite funny. Remember we talked about it at the time on the show like two years ago when yeah. He quite graphically described how disgusting anal sex is in response to some homosexual politician that criticised him.

So anyway, Mark Latham, he hates poofters. He’s increasingly seeming to hate jews. Well not really but you know he did call out the jewish lobby. He said that Chris Minns was emboldening the jewish lobby, that the jewish lobby has too much power and so on. And Latham is one of the front men of this inquiry along with the other Right-wing minor party legislative councilmen who are trying to hold the government to account.

And so it’s a bit of political theatre. Chris Minns is accusing Mark Latham of advancing nefarious anti-semitic conspiracy theories and so on. And Mark Latham responded on Twitter this evening to a clip of that posted by Australians versus the Agenda declaring:

“Chris Minns is his bitch!”

So that was quite funny. I guess he’s out for blood. He’s trying to take Mins down. He sees this as a political opportunity to take the hatchet to the knee of Minns and his government.

Blair Cottrell: Well, now’s the time to put the pressure on. Minns needs to be exposed. He needs to be embarrassed.

Anyway, anyone can put the pressure on him now, they should do it.

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! And at Mark Latham he recently got lost a court case for damages against this homosexual. I think he was from the Greens, Alex Greenwich, I think he was the member for Sydney. So he was voted in by all the Oxford street faggots into that position, I presume. Yeah, a judgement was held that he has to pay him half a million dollars in damages for just simply stating that anal sex is disgusting! What the fuck kind of country do we live in where it costs half a million dollars to offend a homosexual by declaring anal sex is disgusting!

So I think Mark Latham has a bit of a kind of punished aura at the moment. You know, 20 years ago he was the head of the Labor Party. He almost became prime minister. Now he’s getting tossed out of One Nation for being a homophobe and, basically getting bankrupted by the system.

And so what has he got left to lose? He might as well take on the jews. He might as well do some damage to the ruling elite while he’s still got a position. So good on him. I think it’s funny. Mark Latham defended The Noticer when they did a notice, a hit piece saying that Notice The Noticer is a neo-Nazi psyop, basically. And, yeah, he’s kind of flirted more with, like our guys on Twitter. Mark Latham’s a bit of a cuck on race, or more than a bit of a cuck. He’s a cuck on race. He’s not a true nationalist, but he does seem like he’s somewhat of a real human being.

And it seems like he kind of tried to be an establishment politician and kind of was chewed up and spat out through a long [word unclear]

Blair Cottrell: Maybe the reason Latham’s not an ethnic nationalist is because he spent all his time around White Parliamentarians and he just can’t stand you know, [chuckling] so it’s pretty hard to believe in your own race when that’s the extent of the experience that you’ve had with your own race is White Parliamentarians. I don’t envy his kind of company. There’s another way. Latham, if you’re watching this, there’s another way. It doesn’t have to be Parliament.

Joel Davis: Well, actually, I’ve seen Mark Latham Fed post on Twitter when he’s had a few beers. He’s basically said:

“We need a revolution to overthrow a corrupt ruling establishment.”

And so on.

Blair Cottrell: So he must be there. He must be almost there!

Joel Davis: Yeah, it does seem, …

Blair Cottrell: It takes some of us longer to get there, but there’s no shame in that.

Joel Davis: It does seem like Mark Latham is, yeah, he’s kind of become alienated. He tried to do it all the right way, supposedly according to the rules of the old paradigm. He was a true believer in social democracy or whatever.

Blair Cottrell: That’s what happens! That’s exactly what I was talking about before.

Joel Davis: Now he’s a jaded, old goat.

Blair Cottrell: He would be sort of feeling the same frustration that I feel I suppose where you’ve been raised to adhere to these principles, you do adhere to them.

But then the same people who kind of claim to uphold those principles and stand for those principles, they just chew you up and spit you out through all sorts of underhanded tactics. He called me once when I was at the height of my activism, because he had a show I can’t remember what it was called. You might remember he had like a podcast or something going on.

I can’t remember what it was called. But I was just working on a job site I think in Eltham. He rings me and he goes:

“Blair?”

And I’m like:

“Yes.”

And he goes:

“Mark Latham.”

And I’m like:

“G’ day mate, how can I help you?”

And he goes:

“Yeah, do you want to come on the show?”

I said:

“What show is that?”

And he said:

“My show.”

And I’m just like:

“Can I call you back? I’m just in the middle of something.”

Because I was on a scaffold like trying to repair this eaves that was like hanging past the scaffold and like I was kind of balancing. But he seemed to get offended. He’s just like:

“Yeah, right.”

And he just hung up on me. Then I tried to call him back and he didn’t answer. I don’t know, maybe he’s having a bad day. But that’s the extent of the interaction that I’ve had with Mark Latham. He’s got grumpy bad energy. He’s got the grumpy old bad energy he does.

[1:05:03]

Joel Davis: But he’s kind of like one of the few politicians that actually has like red blood in his veins. The only time I was in, I never spoke to him one on one, but anything resembling a conversational context was him just ranting at a conference I attended a few years ago, ranting about how Julia Gillard was a lesbian, how her so-called husband is a beard, that he’s a homosexual himself and that faggots have taken over Australian politics and lamenting this fact, which was quite humourous.

But what Latham tweeted last week that kind of provoked things was him saying two jews on Sky News saying, quote:

“The fake anti-semitism narrative must stop. Might be better to stop legislating when New South Wales police say none of those arrested have anti-semitic ideology. It was a con job set up by mobsters. Minns emboldened the jewish lobby and now it’s out of control.”

So we’re seeing Australian politicians call out the jews probably for the first time I can remember in my lifetime having multiple Australian politicians call out the jews directly. It does feel like a bit of a sea change. John Lawson posted a picture of Mark Latham standing over John Howard and aggressing with his hands and like getting in his face. And Latham’s replying to that, he’s replying to other nationalists. Someone said:

“Wait a minute, is New South Wales politics actually getting interesting for a change?”

And he said:

“We ride to the sound of the guns!”

So Latham’s on the war path. He doesn’t give a fuck anymore! It’s pretty funny. Funny thing, these old politicians that got chewed up and spat out by the major parties kind of like turn. And it’s the smartest politicians. I think Mark Latham and Gerard Rennick are the two highest IQ politicians in Australia and they’re the two that are calling out the jews. So what does that say?

Blair Cottrell: They might, Rennick and Latham might want to read the chapter of Mein Kampf where Hitler explains what happens to someone with real ability who goes into Parliament. Not just someone with real ability, but someone who genuinely holds to principles, who wants to stand up for their country. You should read what Hitler has to say about people like that that go into Parliament and how Parliament just basically becomes a mob to destroy them and get them out. Because in order to survive in Parliament, you need to be a rat without principles! You go into Parliament with principles, they all basically unite against you to get you out. That’s essentially what he says, but he says it much more articulately, he writes it much more articulately than that you can read it for yourself if you want.

Joel Davis: But I love, though, how there’s this emerging kind of renegade like cast in Australian politics, which was previously quite boring and monotonous. We don’t agree with them on everything, but people like Latham, people like Ralph Babet and a few of these other guys that are kind of at least causing problems for the system, and that’s kind of our aspiration, I guess in politics is to kind of join the team and push things even harder and faster and further. The kind of outsider team of Right-wing disturbers and chaos agents, just going Joker mode.

And I think Aussies love that kind of thing. Aussies love an underdog, Aussie’s love sticking it to the man, all that type of thing. So I think that would actually make politics interesting to have a kind of cast of colourful characters, you know, engaging in that more in the years going ahead. And I think that’s probably what we should aim for on the Right-wing of politics is to develop that because that could be the kind of catalyst for meaningful change.

Because as I said, as the reason why I was talking about international politics earlier is World War III is on the horizon. It might not be next week, but it is on the horizon. And when that moment arrives, all bets are off. It’s going to be a total reset of politics. And after World War III is over, is everyone going to be focused on World War II anymore? I don’t think so. there’s going to be a whole new World War for everyone, for the whole world order to be rebuilt around. And the animating myth is going to be all the horrible things that the chinks did to us and so on, rather than how bad the Holocaust was. It’s going to be a total reset of the collective psyche.

Blair Cottrell: We are in post World War II fairy tale land, aren’t we?

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s time’s almost up. Like there’s almost no one alive that remembers World War II at this point.

And by the time World War III is over, there’ll be barely anyone alive who remembers it, but everyone will be remembering what just happened. And what would have just happened is a race war against the Chinese, from our perspective. We’ve got 1.7 million chinks in our country. They’re all going to have to be put in camps or something worse. They’re not going to be able to be trustworthy members of Australian society anymore. There’s going to be a division by race. I think it’s going to be a total reset of our collective values. We’re going to pretend that men and women are totally equivalent at wartime when we actually have to go boots on the ground in the hundreds of thousands and fight to the death? I don’t think so. I think everyone’s going to come back to reality. They’re going to have to, they’re going to have no choice.

[1:10:34]

And so this confrontation with reality is coming.

And so our job is at the moment is to try and get ready for that. Because a lot of people are black pilled because they think that the current paradigm, this kind of monotonous slow grind is just going to continue on ad infinitum forever. Nothing’s ever going to happen, nothing’s ever going to change and we’re all just going to go out with a wimper. That’s not how history works. That’s not what’s going to happen. There’s going to be a major crisis. Everything is going to get blown up and remade. All of our values are going to get reset in the coming generations. And the work that we’re doing now is setting the table for that next generation to eat. Like we’re getting things ready for the paradigm shift which is on the horizon.

So people need to think like that if we have a movement established, even if it’s just tens of thousands or 100,000 men and we’re only getting a certain percentage of the vote and we have one or two guys elected or something, we’re going to at least be in a position to make the most of the coming crises, to grow and gain influence and gain a seat at the table. We want to have a seat at the table at World War 3 from the Australian political perspective. We want to have a seat at the table because in order to conduct World War 3, as we said before, what’s the most powerful force in politics? Right? Racism! That’s the main force you’re going to be able to channel in the Australian people to get them to fucking fight. And we are the arbiters of racism in our country. We are the vanguard!

So we’re going to take on a very different role in our society from just being these hated, despised, controversial outsiders. We’re going to end up becoming, we’re going to have a completely different relevance in society in the coming decades.

So we have to get ready, we have to get building and time is running out. We need to get serious. The next few years, it’s indeterminate, when all hell is going to break loose. But it’s going to happen soon.

So yeah, and the Anthony Albanese’s of the world are going to get wiped away. They’re not going to survive. We’re not going to be electing gay nerds into office after World War III. It’s going to call for a completely different kind of politician politics in general. The whole social attitude will change. The men who come back from World War III are going to come back embittered, but also entitled. They just went and fought to the death for the future of their nation. Are they going to come back and just allow it to be fucking given away to women in pants suits and fucking Indians? I don’t fucking think. So I don’t.

Blair Cottrell: I think when all of that comes about, you’re a little bit frozen up, by the way, I can hear you fine, but your camera is just all frozen up. And it’s not just for me because I’m noticing someone in the comments mentioned it too. But watch all the other races in Australia and probably throughout other Western countries, watch them all suddenly be on their best behaviour when that situation with China that probably will turn into a new World War eventually comes around, because suddenly White people will begin to become more conscious of the fact that they are White and that they have their own ethnic interests at stake. And outsiders are going to become easier to recognise. Because with that basic introduction of the anti-Chinese racism that you say will become kind of a central feature of life during that time, you know, naturally we’re going to start recognizing other people who aren’t like us as well more easily.

And all of those arrogant Indians that are currently boasting about taking over certain regions in our country, all the Africans who are on home invasion sprees and murdering doctors in the hills, happened just last year. A young 17 year old was just convicted of that a couple of days ago in Melbourne. All of these people, I think will suddenly be on their best behaviour, and it’s going to be an interesting shift, interesting change.

I’m not overly excited about anti-semitism being a mainstream thing again because I know that that’s how things pretty much always were throughout the history of Europe, at least before the Second World War, leading up to the Second World War. Basically every country was anti-semitic as a general rule. I mean, Christians just generally understood that jewish people weren’t to be trusted. There was an understanding that jewish people weren’t generally friendly to Christians. I think that was mostly prevalent throughout Europe. And I’m sure there were times in some countries where that consensus, that understanding kind of became less prevalent and then something would happen and people would realise the reality of the situation again, because you’ve got times where kings in England, for example, like oh, now the jews are okay. And then 15 years later they’re kicking the jews out again. But the jews know how to live. They would have necessary, or how should I put it? They would have essential blood memories. So they know how to survive in environments where anti-semitism is rife. So I wouldn’t get too excited about it.

But it is exciting to consider what the world would look like, what Australia would look like if White people redeveloped a bit of ethnic consciousness. That’s what I’m trying to say, in essence. And that’s really all that I want to see in my lifetime.

I mean, I don’t really want for much. I would just like to die having seen a country filled with my own people who know who they are and know who their enemy is, who are able to recognise outsiders and threats. So I feel like I’ve died having served some sort of purpose, you know.

[1:16:14]

Joel Davis: Sure. I think for Americans the jewish issue is more central because that’s the kind of centre of jewish power in the world is the United States. And they exercise a lot more influence over American political and cultural life.

Blair Cottrell: That Zionist, that Judeo-Christian mythology, whatever you want to call it’s kind of popular in America, isn’t it? Maybe not so much as it was 10 years ago, but there’s still that, yeah, God’s chosen people thing going on.

Joel Davis: Yeah, obviously there’s that. But even beyond that, just jews occupy a very prominent role in American life. Like, even though they’re like 3% of the population, they’re massively over-represented in media.

So if you’re watching podcasts, like there was the Leather Apron Club videos where he went through all the big podcasts, like all the big political podcasts, Tim pool, Joe Rogan, etc, etc. And he was going through them all and it was like a third plus of the guests on all these podcasts were jewish. Even though they’re only 3% of the population, they’re over-represented in the kind of tastemaking culture setting domains.

And so they have an outsized influence on American culture and political life, not to mention all the money that they’re putting in. And this is true on the Left-wing and the Right. It’s not just like the religious Zionists or whatever. Jews are more influential probably on the Left than on the Right in America in many ways, because just of how the majority of them are Leftists in the United States.

So that’s a big deal for Americans. And also primarily it’s the American military that’s getting dragged in to fight Zionist wars and so on. Like, we get kind of dragged along, but it’s kind of a secondary thing for us. It’s more primary for them. So it’s a more prominent issue for them.

But the reason why we did The jews Hate Freedom protest before Christmas last year, it wasn’t just because of the topical nature of that issue, which obviously it was primarily about, but it was because I think that’s the best way to frame the jewish problem to Australians in the current year, which is what is the jewish lobby primarily pushing for in Australia? The main thing that it’s pushing for always is hate speech legislation. And more and more attacks on our freedom of speech. Every single time anything happens, jews come out into the media and demand more arrests, more laws passed and so on. They want to shut us down. And Australians value freedom, and so they don’t appreciate this small minority trying to take away the freedoms of the rest of us because of their own hysteria and their own lack of ability to take criticism.

So I think that’s the strong frame and I think it’s a strong frame for Americans as well, I mean, there’s jews clamouring in the United States to take away their freedoms as well. And there’s nothing, there’s probably no value that Americans hold more dear than liberty.

So the kind of jews versus freedom framing I think is the best framing. You know, last week I criticised Sam Hyde for going on a podcast and trying to frame the problem with jews as:

“Well, look at the genocide that they’re doing in Palestine. Do you want to pay for that with your tax dollars?”

And it’s like, that’s probably convincing to like Leftists who sympathize with browns. But like, we should be talking about what jews are doing to us! Like how we are negatively affected by jewish institutional behaviour, not other groups. You know, who gives a shit about Palestinians ultimately, other than bleeding Leftists, not that many people or like Muslims, but like, who does the average patriotic White Australian care about themselves? Ourselves. So it needs to be framed in those terms. And you know, a lot of the problems that are occurring in Australia, they don’t boil down to jews. Like the problems with mass immigration and so on. Jews have played a leading role in advancing mass immigration and multiculturalism and so on. But it’s not just the jews.

Like, it’s a coalition of different groups, whether it be the housing industry, whether it be ideological Leftists and globalists, whether it be other, like non-White minority groups in their lobbying efforts or voting blocs or whatever. There’s a coalescence of anti-White forces in our society.

But on the issue of free speech, jews are playing a massively outsized and prominent role in attacking it. So on the one hand they try to portray themselves as:

“Oh, but you know, Israel’s a free liberal democracy. And if you oppose Israel, you’re allying yourself with these communists and Muslims who hate freedom and liberalism.”

And so you’re like some backwards, you know, fascist or something. That’s how they frame things. But it’s ridiculous! That’s such a weak frame. We need to smash through that framework and say:

“No, we’re on the side of freedom. You’re on the side of tyranny!”

If you’re not doing anything wrong, if the jewish role in society isn’t a problem, if what Israel’s doing isn’t a problem, why can’t we talk about it? Why can’t you just sit down and debate it and defend your position openly?

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you care about the Holocaust, Joel?

So what you’re saying in essence is anti-semitism is equivalent to the highest knowledge.

Joel Davis: What do you mean by that?

[1:21:49]

Blair Cottrell: I’m sort of like borrowing a Christian. I don’t know if it’s a Christian phrase or it’s actually from the Bible, says:

“Fear of God is equivalent to the highest knowledge.”

It’s true in religion maybe, but in politics anti-semitism is equivalent to the highest knowledge. You would think that you go into life thinking that any kind of prejudice any kind of stereotyping a person is just prejudice. And you’re not going to give yourself to that kind of brutal nature of thought.

But then the more you actually pay attention, you realise there’s a good reason for stereotypes, ethnic stereotypes in particular, and that there’s anti-semitism for a reason. It’s not just because people are idiots. It’s because people have observed the reality of a nature of a certain group of people for a very long time. [chuckling] It’s like that people continue to engage in certain practices, continue to behave in a certain way which leads other people to be somewhat hostile to them for their own purposes, which is usually a natural response.

So I think in summary, you could say that anti-semitism is the result of a lot of acquired knowledge. It’s not just some knee jerk reaction springing from prejudice or bigotry, as they try to frame it.

Joel Davis: Yeah, the problems associated with the jewish community and its influence over our society, it actually requires like careful study and analysis. It’s not something which is like directly evident. I think people who have a more superficial view of society, they tend to not have very strong opinions on jews. They’ll be more upset at other groups that are more prominent and public facing.

Blair Cottrell: Did you hear? Well, that’s the point, isn’t it? That’s probably one of the reason the jewish people aren’t so prominent and public facing.

Joel Davis: I think a we’ve talked about on the show before. I think it’s a big mistake for them. They’re shooting themselves in the foot. They should shut up and retreat into the background. If they truly aren’t doing anything wrong, shut up and retreat into the background and allow us to have our race war with the Indians and the Chinese and the Muslims and all these other groups and retreat into the background and pretend to be on whichever side is winning, you know. [chuckling]

Blair Cottrell: I do like the way like the standard jewish merchant that I’ve had dealings with in construction in the past. I do like the way they don’t flaunt their wealth. It’s one thing that the standard average jewish character from the southeast region of Melbourne, like Malvern, Elston, Wick regions, you would never know that they were wealthy. But they do tend to have access to a great deal of wealth. Like they’ll own big car parks in the city, high rise hotel buildings or family members of theirs will own that stuff and they’ll have shares in it kind of thing. But they’ll drive the kind of cars, they’ll drive a Camry and they’ll be wearing tracksuit pants and a T-shirt from Kmart or just some button up polo from Kmart. You know, they’re unshaven sometimes you don’t, you would never know. These are the way a lot of the jewish merchants around Melbourne operate, operate. And I kind of admire that because it at least is an expression of ego control to some extent.

Because when you think about it, the people who wear the big fat watches and lots of jewelry and drive around in like $200,000 Maseratis, what’s the point of that? What is the point in flaunting your wealth? What’s the point in wasting money on that shit in the first place? Like, what are you actually trying to achieve? Like:

“Look at me, I’m really rich and special!”

Isn’t that just ego fragility? Just that you’re trying to draw attention to yourself.

Joel Davis: So if you’re a billionaire Blair, you’re telling me you wouldn’t buy a fast car?

Blair Cottrell: I definitely wouldn’t. I would buy a nice Tiguan. I would buy a very nice Volkswagen Tiguan, because they’re a good reliable car and I would like a nice new, new sort of updated.

Joel Davis: I’d buy an Aston Martin. I’d buy an Aston Martin.

Blair Cottrell: You don’t want to be driving around in a car like that in the current climate though. You’re just going to, it’s probably just going to get stolen by Africans. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t buy nice things because they’ll be stolen by Africans.

What I’m saying is, …

Joel Davis: Put it in the garage! How they’re going to get?

Blair Cottrell: But why do you need it? Like this is what I’m talking about.

Joel Davis: I want to do 240km an hour down the highway!

Blair Cottrell: Okay, but when are you going to do that? In the middle of the night when the coppers aren’t going to catch you.

Joel Davis: I’m doing 240. Good luck catching me. Plus, I got enough money to pay the tickets if I’m a billionaire.

Blair Cottrell: Right, [chuckling] but you’re gonna get sick of that eventually. I mean, okay, that’s a hobby. You’re talking about a hobby, but I’m talking about why would you, like, walk around in lots of gold chains, jewelry, …

Joel Davis: I wouldn’t walk around in gold chains.

Blair Cottrell: Like express your wealth? Like, what’s the point?

Joel Davis: I just would like to drive a ridiculously fast car, ridiculously fast. Because it’s fun.

Blair Cottrell: I get it. But again, we’re just talking about hobbies. If you had a lot of money, you wouldn’t. If you had a lot of, …

Joel Davis: I think jews are too neurotic, like:

“Oh, I’m gonna crash!”

Like, they wouldn’t even have the balls to go 240, you know?

[1:27:32]

Blair Cottrell: Well, I gotta admit, I don’t know. I mean, what’s the point in driving 240 or just for the thrill rush. Man! What I’m saying though, is I think the jews, not all of them, obviously, but the majority of them, they must be raised this way. Or maybe it’s just part of their genetic nature. They do seem to have good outward ego control where they don’t flaunt their wealth.

But it’s probably all part of their subversive demeanour. Right? So you don’t really expect much from them. It is very true that you never really expect much from jewish people. When you deal with them on an individual basis, they always seem kind of nervous and skittish and you kind of feel sorry for them. That’s the impact they’ve always had on me. You kind of feel sorry for them and so you’re extra nice to them, because this is long before I ever really knew what I knew about jews. So I do admire that one element of their disposition, which is they don’t tip, they don’t tend to flaunt their wealth. And they’re some of the wealthiest people you’ll ever work with or for, if you’re in whatever industry that you’re in where you might come across them.

Joel Davis: I think the main thing to admire about them is that they invest a lot of their wealth in the advancement of their community rather than just the advancement of themselves as individuals.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s true.

Joel Davis: There are a lot of Anglo millionaires and billionaires, like multi, multi-millionaires and billionaires in this country who don’t put one single dollar into the advancement of White Australia, which is why the country is being stolen from us!

The jews are 0.4% of the population and their lobby is so aggressive and powerful because they pay for it. They put their community first as a group. And you know, meanwhile a lot of our richest people are fundamentally making money off our replacement. Maybe they’re working in industries that benefit from cheap non-White labour or if they’re in housing construction, they’re benefiting from mass immigration or whatever.

Blair Cottrell: And it makes your eye roll thinking about your parents, doesn’t it? I mean, I love my parents, but the standard sort of White Boomer parents, all they really think about is their retirement, is retiring comfortably and spending all the money or wealth that they’ve generated throughout their lifetime on themselves at the end of their lives. Which people watching this might think, good on them.

I mean, that’s the phrase they use in Australia:

“Oh, good on them. They should be able to do that. They’ve worked hard their whole lives!”

Yeah, I get it.

But when you contrast that kind of decision making process with what the jews are doing, with what the Chinese are doing, with what pretty much every other race in this country are doing, it’s kind of retarded to just blow all the wealth that you have generated through your working life on yourself and Martinis and cruises and fine dining before you die while your children have to inherit the mess that you fucking leave behind! I mean, you got to admit that’s pretty retarded, right.

I think being a bit more collectivist and having a little bit more foresight, generational foresight with the money that you make in your life, if you’re a Boomer, might serve your nation to some extent.

And that’s right, someone says in the comments:

“They taught our people to think as individuals.”

That’s the problem. And the Boomers can be really bad for that. Like I’m not an anti-boomer sort of guy. I’m a bit of a Boomer appreciater it in a lot of ways, because they do work really hard. They’re an industrious people. They’re always trying to fix things. They don’t like to relax, they’re always working. But they’ve definitely been geared to think on individual basis and that’s why all they seem to care about is their retirement.

Joel Davis: The Strausshowe generational theory predicts that Boomers and Gen-X’s will be more individualistic because Boomers grew up at a time of great prosperity. They grew up at the time after World War II, where you know, society was on high, institutions were working incredibly well. There were incredible opportunities. They’re highly idealistic generation that challenged spiritually the values of the old order because there was no crisis for them to really, like, confront in their lifetime. So their politics or their cultural involvement primarily became one of spiritual dissatisfaction.

Then you have the Gen-X’s who are like more jaded individualists, where the Boomers are idealistic individualists who want freedom and liberation and all this kind of stuff. And so they’re very focused on how they can enjoy their retirement and waste all their money on garbage rather than thinking about legacy.

Gen-X’s raised with very careless parents. There they were raised as kind of like a forgotten generation. They’re incredibly nihilistic and cynical because they were raised after the Boomers who had this great idealistic project that totally failed, and they perceived that. So Gen-X’s think it’s all bullshit! There’s nothing you can do to change the system. Just, you know, advance yourself as an individual as much as possible. Just make money and do what you got to do. There’s no higher purpose or meaning to society or life.

And so these are the two generations that are kind of running the show at the moment because they’re the ones with the wealth and the power and the influence. And they’re very individualistic for two kind of different reasons in terms of polarity.

But what the this generational theory predicts is that for Millennials, that we’re actually, … And by Millennials, they. Their cut-off point for Millennials is later than what’s most commonly understood. So older Zoomers are included in this.

[1:33:20]

Basically, if you’re an adult now, if you’re at least over the age of 21, you kind of fall in this category. For our generation, we’re a lot more collectivist because we were raised at a time of decline. Society has been declining. The generation that came before us were nihilistic. They didn’t really believe in anything.

And so we’re not really kind of reacting to a false idealism. Instead, we’re responding to a kind of society of excessive individualism, excessive nihilism, and instead have a kind of inclination to form for collective solutions rather than individualistic solutions. So where, like Gen-Xers say:

“Oh, well, you got no chance in changing the system. Just try and make money and be successful as an individual.”

Millennials tend to be more supportive of collective political solutions to our problems and say:

“Well, how can I as an individual succeed in a system like this?”

And so Millennials are far more predisposed to socialist economic policies, for example, and more collectivist political ideologies, whether it be on the Left or the Right, than previous generations.

So as we kind of ascend and become take over the system in the coming generational cycle, because we’ll become the older people that are actually in charge of the government and in charge of everything, basically, our values will start to get imposed on society and society will move in that direction.

So that’s another reason why I think the future of the Australian Right-wing is not going to be talking, it’s not going to be promoting conservative libertarian style policies around:

“We’ve got to cut taxes and we’ve got to reduce the national debt and people need to work harder!”

And all this kind of stuff. What’s going to motivate Millennials in the political space is redistributing wealth to our generation, giving us free stuff, giving us basically making up for the fact that wealth has been hoarded into the other generations, making up and kind of restructuring the economy. Collective solutions to individual problems rather than individual solutions to collective problems, which is predominant within Generation X. Like, Generation X thought that Fight Club was like the coolest movie ever, because Fight Club was all like:

“Society sucks, man! Let’s just go and like punch on in a garage and like blow buildings up and like have sex that’ll be awesome and get drunk.”

Whereas, like, they thought Nirvana was like the greatest band ever because they were like:

“Everything sucks!”

And they’re like:

“Whoa, that’s so deep!”

Whereas, like, Millennials are like, they don’t resonate with that kind of thing. Instead, Millennials are interested in, as I said, idealistic collective solutions, like, who is responsible on the collective level? How can we solve it on the collective level? Which makes sense why nationalism would resurge and socialism would resurge simultaneously within our generation.

So the future of Right-wing politics is a kind of nationalist Right-wing socialism. It’s not going to be small government, it’s not going to be doubling down individualism. Everyone is sick of individualism. Young people don’t want individualism. Young people don’t want to be told:

“Pull yourself up by your bootstraps, go talk to her!”

And all that kind of advice:

“Get it done!”

Blair Cottrell: The problem with individualism is you get too much of yourself under some sort of individualism or individualistic thought process system. You get too much of yourself and you get bored with it. You know we’ve had individualism, and look where it’s led individuals. Everyone’s on a plethora of script meds, sitting at home watching Netflix by themselves, paying off a mortgage by themselves, and just living in there in their honeycomb cell.

But I’ve got to bounce, man! I’ve got to bounce because I’ve got a really early start. I’ve got to get to bed.

Joel Davis: Can we do our four Superchats?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, if we’ve only got four, that’s fine. Yeah. Sorry, guys, if I’m sort of ending it abruptly, but I’m worried I won’t sleep tonight. And if I don’t sleep, I’m gonna have a really hard time tomorrow. I’ve got a bit of traveling to do tomorrow.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I was gonna get you to react to that Indian video, but fuck it! We’ll do it another time.

Blair Cottrell: Well, I already watched it. The guy on your channel saying that:

“Hey, we’re taking over everything and we’re gonna marry your sons and daughters.”

Or something like that.

Basically, he was almost boasting that he was going to end up with like, all the Indians are going to get everyone’s sloppy seconds:

“You’re all going to get divorced, and then your divorced wives are going to get with us!”

He goes:

“Every Indian guy I know is with someone who’s not Indian!”

And I’m thinking, that’s not my experience. Every Indian I know is with an Indian. Well, it’s usually Indian men walking around in-groups looking for some girl to sexually assault. [chuckling]

But, yeah, it’s just your take on it that you posted on Telegram was perfect when you said that basically, what the guy is relishing in is the fact that in his mind, White Australians are destined just to end up in the same ethnic situation that he’s in.

Joel Davis: Well, you’re downbred into the genetic slop that he is.

Blair Cottrell: I was trying to say, in a way, …

Joel Davis: That’s his, like, ideal revenge is that:

“Oh, yeah, you think we smell and you think we’re disgusting and you think we’re a slave cast of Uber drivers. Well, guess what your grandkids are going to be half Indian Uber drivers, too, and you’re going to be down here in the fucking muck with us!”

Blair Cottrell: And there is a real vengeance, there is a real revenge sentiment amongst some of the Indians nowadays, I’ve noticed, isn’t there? Or just people who are responding to any sort of White nationalist talking point on TikTok or something like that you can see in their eyes, hear in their voice and you know, in their words it’s quite obvious that’s like they want vengeance. They want vengeance that they’re not White! They’re irritated that they’re not White! They’re irritated that White people are realizing that they’re White, recognizing the significance of that and starting to talk about it.

And all of these people are vengeful as a result! Let’s like, they don’t want that to happen. Obviously, it’s an existential thing. They’re worried they’re going to be sent back to their own countries, maybe.

[1:40:00]

Joel Davis: I saw a thread on Twitter by this Indian who posted. He said:

“Joel Davis, who hates Indians, well, he’s Irish and the Irish aren’t even White!”

And he thinks that he, … Anyway, I’m not even Irish, by the way. Full disclosure, I’m Scottish and English mixed together. Yeah, he was saying that apparently I’m Irish and then posted one of these those old like physiognomy charts from like the early 20th century where it showed like how the Irish kind of looked like niggers and being like basically, just like it was funny.

But then like, you’re not even White, you’re Irish. It’s like you’re a fucking pajeet. Like, even if I was Irish, you’re a pajeet! Like their main insult is like:

“Yeah, well you’re also brown. Like, you’re also a piece of shit! Like we’re both pieces of shit together!”

It’s not even like elevating himself up. It’s just dragging you down. It’s like when homosexuals try to like insinuate that you don’t like them because you’re secretly gay. It’s like, would that be insulting? Would me being a homosexual be something that’s disgusting and gross? Well, actually, I agree! It would be disgusting and gross if I was a homosexual. Interesting that you say that.

Blair Cottrell: I’ve said it before. It’s hard to be offended by, it’s probably because you can’t say anything to a White guy to a reasonably well bred White guy, which I imagine. Well, I like to think that you and I are reasonably well bred White men. What can you say to us? Like that’s a racial slur that’s actually going to irritate us. What can you actually say? There’s nothing! What am I going to get offended by? What are you going to call me Casper or pasty or something? Like, okay, I’m fine with that. There’s just nothing that can be said that’s going to like, suddenly make me realise that I belong to an ethnic group that I despise or I’m trying to distract myself from. I’m not trying to distract myself from my ethnic identity. You can only get offended if you’re actually not proud of who you are. If someone’s like using a racial slur, that’s the only reason you could be offended.

But yeah, like you said, there’s always just efforts to drag you down with these people. Let’s move on though, because I’m getting to the point where like, I slept three hours last night. I don’t even know how I’m running, like, how I’m still awake for some reason. I’m still going.

But yeah, I’m on three hours and I’m only going to get five if I go to bed right now. So we need to get through these Superchats.

Joel Davis: Well How’s it Going, said:

“Are you guys aware of the Australian band called Black Magic SS? They lean heavy on National Socialist imagery and themes.”

I am aware of Black Magic SS. They’re a doom metal outfit. And yeah, I think they’re pretty cool! Have you heard of them?

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. I’ve been to some gigs where bands like that have played. Are they Black Metal? I’m imagining they’re black.

Joel Davis: No, no, they’re not Black Metal. They’re like Doom Metal. They sound kind of like imagine if Black Sabbath was less pop sensible and kind of racist. More like mystique.

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know if I’ve seen them. I don’t think I have. I’ve seen some Black Metal bands that are into that.

Joel Davis: Like, yeah, obviously there’s heaps of NS Black Metal bands, but yeah, no, they’re not Black Metal.

Blair Cottrell: Okay, let’s check them out.

Joel Davis: I think they’re Australian too, from memory

Blair Cottrell: Wiggle Do sends through $10. Thanks very much. He said:

“Lots of people want to be more racist than Hitler in NS circles. Where do you stand on Nuremberg Laws and mixed races? How do you draw the line between White and non-White?”

I think Joel’s mentioned this before in previous streams. It would come down to like organisational policy, I think, and different organisations would have different policies on that question. But I’m pretty sure the boys, Joel and the guys have their own policy on that, don’t you?

Joel Davis: Yeah. So it depends on the genetic distance. So like, if you have like trace amounts of like blood black, like African ancestry or Aboriginal ancestry. Less percentage of that can be tolerated relative to if you have like, I don’t know, like trace amounts of like Middle Eastern ancestry or Asiatic kind of ancestries because they’re less genetically different. So it’s dependent on the what the form of blood pollution, what percentage can be allowed. The Nuremberg Laws were primarily just about jews. And in my opinion they were if anything a little bit too lenient. So does that make me more racist than Hitler if I mean I’m Australian?

Rigo Weber said:

“Does the NSN have monetary incentives for White families to have more children? I think this should be a high priority for the NSN culture to develop, especially to replace all the mass deported.”

What do you mean? Do we within our own organisation pay people to breed? No! We don’t pay people to breed within the organisation. We do have so many people from, …

[1:45:14]

Blair Cottrell: What I can see there’s a lot of encouragement to breed.

Joel Davis: Yeah. Everyone’s having families. The reason why people aren’t having families is not so much about monetary incentives, it’s more about culture. If you have a culture that celebrates motherhood and you’re in a group of friends and associates where motherhood is valued and having children is valued, then the women pick up on that signal and go:

“You know what, I want to have kids too. I don’t want to be like some like sterile ageing, you know, wench, surrounded by all these fertile young women with all these babies hanging off their titties, you know, growing the next generation.”

So you know, if you develop a pronatalist culture, it kind of flows.

But in terms of like government policy, obviously when we put the political party together, one of our policies is going to be paying people to be carers for their own children. So like right now you have a situation where if you say you have a two year old, you’re a mother, you want to go back to work, the taxpayer, through the government, will give you a childcare rebate so the taxpayer will pay some Filipino immigrant to look after your kid in some child care facility surrounded by freaks and non-Whites and potentially pedos so that you can go and work because otherwise you wouldn’t be able to afford to work basically because you can’t even afford to pay child care costs for your own kid. That’s ridiculous!

But then if you’re a stay at home mom, you get nothing. It’s a completely perverse incentive. So what we’re going to do is reverse it and pay, fuck the child care rebate. If you want to go and work, you got to figure out who’s going to look after your kids if you can’t.

But if you’re going to look after your own kids, the society should pay you. We a collapsed birth rate, we need to have more White babies, we need to have more young Australian babies. And so we’ve got to make it economically viable for young families to have children.

So that’s going to be one of our signature policies. I think it’ll be very popular. I think women will like it. I think young men will like it too, because it takes the pressure off them too. If your missus is getting paid big money to raise your kids well, then raising a family on a single income becomes possible again. Say she’s getting 70, 80 grand a year from Centrelink and then you’re out making 100 grand a year or whatever. Now you’ve got a decent income so you can make a life for yourself.

Catenaria said:

“What are your thoughts on human rights? The right to life, liberty, security, freedom of speech, assembly and expression. Are they inherent and universal? Should they be protected?”

I don’t believe human rights exist. They are not inherent, they’re not universal, they’re social constructs. Should we construct them within our societies is a different question. I think within White societies, the maximum amount of freedom that can be apportioned to your population without compromising the security of your nation, should be afforded.

So I don’t think we should give freedom to communists, to traitor elements within the society, to, or definitely not to foreigners, alien foreign interests in our society, trying to subvert it and undermine it. But I think normal White people should have freedom of speech and assembly and expression. Absolutely!

So, yeah, but they’re social constructs, which means that there’s nothing universal inherent about them. They were dreamt up in the 20th century. No one ever thought they existed before then, because they don’t. They’re just phantasms of the mind. They’re ideological constructs, they have no metaphysical basis.

Blair Cottrell: Obviously, that’s true. But perhaps the essence of the question is, would you maintain any sort of semblance of human rights, like, let’s say you get everything you want and you’ve got a White ethno-state. Would you keep the concept of human rights, like, woven into Australian law, or would you?

Joel Davis: Not human rights. Not human rights. But I think having rights for the Australian people, specifically the White Australian People, they should have rights. We should guarantee their rights. But enemies of the nation and foreign alien interests should not have rights. Fuck you! Go create your own country somewhere else and get them to give you rights. Our government is responsible for securing the rights of our people, not anybody else. And we could make. And we could respect the rights of like all White people, let’s say with got cousin nations around the world and we can respect their rights and they would respect our rights and things like that. But it’s a construct, it’s a decision, it’s not an absolute!

Blair Cottrell: I’d be more concerned with conducting myself with dignity and strength rather than arbitrary concepts. Abstract concepts like rights to life, liberty, freedom of speech. These are all very, I don’t know, you’ve got to understand that when you have concepts like that that are available to everyone in a specific country, then that country becomes receptive to external threats, subversion. People are going to use those rights against you. They’re going to get into your country and they’re going to use that shit against you. So that’s a problem. There’s a bit to unpack there.

But this is the kind of thing that you sit around a table with some other very learnt people and you discuss where the boundaries, where you’re going to draw the line with stuff like this, and how you’re actually going to define your state form. Because I don’t like concepts like the ones that were enshrined into the basis of Australian democracy. You know, the ones I grew up with, as I explained earlier in the stream. Because they’re all bullshit! And they’re just used by enemies of our country to subvert and exploit our country and extract the wealth generated by the Labor in our country and send it overseas and you know, get up to all sorts of mischief in the process. To the extent where our children. The greatest thing our children contend with in public schools is:

“What gender am I?”

You know, all of this has been the result of freedom of expression and human rights and stuff like that. Right. That’s just opened the door for all manner of subversives to come into this country and work their bullshit magics. So like I don’t go for that kind of stuff. But I do believe in honour, dignity, being fair. I believe in harsh punishments, but fair punishments nonetheless. I believe in consequences, that kind of thing. But as I said, there’s a lot to unpack here, isn’t there?

[1:52:21]

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I also believe that thinking of rights only at the level of the individual is wrong. I think groups have rights if we’re going, … And I don’t think rights exist metaphysically. I think they’re constructs.

Blair Cottrell: No, they don’t! But that’s why I said you need to sit around a table and like, determine what the rights are.

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! But I think groups need to have rights too. When we sit down and we say:

“Okay, well, individuals want to have rights.”

Okay, but groups need to have rights. So the nation needs to have rights too. The nation needs to be able to say:

“Well, this is what the nation needs in order to survive and to maintain itself. And those rights need to be respected.”

And in some respects they impair upon individual rights. So like I wouldn’t in a kind of, in the ethno-state, normal, healthy White people, if you want to marry another normal, normal, healthy member of the opposite sex, okay. I don’t think we should be like micromanaging that. I know there’s some eugenics spergs who think that, but I think that’s kind of really unromantic and inhumane. So okay, but then like, if you fall in love with like, I don’t know, an African woman. No! Like, we’re not going to allow that. That’s disgusting! Just like if you fall in love with your dog and you want to marry your dog. No, we’re not going to allow that either. That’s fucking disgusting!

Blair Cottrell: So I’m sure the African women aren’t akin to dogs? You’re talking about an actual animal versus a different, …

Joel Davis: Rather have a dog in my house, to be honest, than a fucking African woman.

Blair Cottrell: So. [chuckling] Yeah, what did you say before that? What was unromantic or inhumane? Oh, like you gave an example.

Joel Davis: Allowing free healthy White people to marry whatever member of the opposite sex they want to marry. I said:

“I think restricting that too much is inhumane, unromantic.”

Blair Cottrell: Okay, so you’re a romantic?

Joel Davis: We had like eugenics doing the like, nerd calculations on the genetics and we’re like:

“Computer says you’ve got to like marry this person!”

Blair Cottrell: Well let’s create a scenario somewhere in the middle. Let’s say that a White guy wants to marry Arab woman.

Joel Davis: Well, no! Because you’re violating the rights of the White Australian nation to perpetuate itself. You’re poisoning the blood of our nation. It’s not about you.

Blair Cottrell: You’re interfering with free will. And you got to understand when you ban something, you kind of make it in a taboo way more desirable to the darker nature of people. So you got to be careful with outright banning shit like that! You’ve got to discourage it and put social pressure on them.

Joel Davis: You know it used to be illegal in Australia, right. You know, miscegenation, like mixed race marriages used to be illegal.

Blair Cottrell: Right, right, I get that. But I think it would be more effective if, …

Joel Davis: Does everyone find it super desirable to, …

Blair Cottrell: Australian society right now, the way it is right now, and you just outright ban miscegenation now, I don’t know, I think you’d almost make it even more taboo. And you know when you tell a child don’t do something, you ban a child from like watching a certain TV show for example, that they kind of want to watch, then going to try harder to watch it.

Joel Davis: Well, you can do it, but you can move to their country and do it. I mean we want to kick them out of our country. So how are we going to let you bring in non-Whites into our country just because you want to marry them? If you want to marry them, you’re going to go to their country and marry them. But we’re not bringing in a bunch of Filipino wives into Australia and creating all these hapa franken children. Go to the Philippines if you want to.

Blair Cottrell: I get it. Again, at the very least, I don’t want to say illusion, but the idea of free will I think is still an important thing, because you need to show White people respect, they need to believe they have free will. I think a necessary amount of social pressure can be put on people.

Joel Davis: Yeah, but if you want rights, like if you want the nation to give you rights, you also have to respect the nation’s rights. So if you’re going to violate the nation with your rights, why should the nation continue to defend your rights? Doesn’t make any sense. It’s not reciprocal.

So like if you want to go in and like breed with foreign people that we deem collectively [words unclear] we’re going to expel you from the nation, you’re no longer an Australian. Take your passport and you can fuck off!

[1:56:39]

Blair Cottrell: Right. So you’re still giving the person the choice, but they have to relinquish the privileges that they’ve obtained by being Australian in order to violate the principles of the nation. I understand that. See, that’s fair. Yeah, I suppose I’m with you on that one. I just get a little bit, because I’ve always valued my own, my own autonomy.

Joel Davis: Yeah, but like the thing is White guys with Asian wives. So often I see a critic on the Internet of us and our ideology who seems like a normal White dude, and then you click on the profile and you see the Asian wife almost every time!

Blair Cottrell: Do you always click on the profiles of your critics to check their posting?

Joel Davis: On profiles all day? If I was always clicking on them I’d be doing it all day.

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling] Do you have any critics who you take seriously, though? Because most of the people who criticise you are not like serious critics. They’re just people that don’t like you for some reason. They don’t like something you said. Have you got any serious critics that you can, …

Joel Davis: They’re not really critics. I mean, I’ve had debates with people that I respect over the years who, where there are interesting debates on a particular issue. Like, I debated like the Russia, Ukraine thing with a lot of people, and I respect people that have different opinions on that issue or various other issues. I don’t think every issue is so cut and dry. And it’s interesting to hear out two positions on a lot of issues.

But then there’s when people are just kind of vitriolic and just hate you for emotional reasons, there’s nothing that interesting that they’re saying, you’re not really dealing with, …

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I meant. Like, is there anyone who really stimulates Joel Davis, a critic that you consider to be roughly equal, who actually gets your brain moving, you enjoy actually arguing with them? Is there anyone like that?

Joel Davis: I haven’t found good, I used to have more people like that. But I haven’t found many good opponents lately.

I mean, I had a good little like, text debate with Keith Woods a few months ago. That was fun, where it was actually like a more substantive debate. But yeah, it’s hard to find good, …

Blair Cottrell: I sometimes wish I disagreed with. I sometimes wish I disagreed with you more on things so I could argue with you a little bit more. You would run rings around me usually.

But when I’ve had a good sleep and I’m in the right mood, I think we could have some really good mental clashes. I know that you kind of thrive on that kind of stuff too. I’ve noticed. Like, I watched last week’s stream with Ninja. I watched most of it and I thought to myself, next time Ninja comes on, he should try to contend with you on a few things or at least ask you to explain things further. Maybe challenge you once or twice, because I’ve noticed that that’s what really gets you going. You need that oppositional force to reckon with joel Davis: Yeah. I like debating. I like entertaining two sides. People are saying Drew Pavlou. I mean, I would go on Drew’s show if Drew wants to. I know he’s live streaming, like, every day now because he’s trying to stack Superchat coin. If he wants to get some views. Here’s one for you guys that are on Twitter. Go tell Drew Pavlou to extend the invite if he wants to have me on casual stream. We can debate things. We can discuss what’s going on in Australian culture.

Blair Cottrell: Drew, if you’re watching this. I don’t really know you that well. I don’t click on your profile. I’m not even allowed on Twitter. But it’s 100% a good idea. It was one of the most entertaining things I’ve ever watched. People into politics, they watched that debate that you did with Joel and thought it was really entertaining. I don’t think you could go wrong if you want to actually produce good content. I think you and Joel being in the room together again could be really good!

Joel Davis: Wouldn’t have to be in the room together. Like, we could just do like a Streamyard stream on his YouTube or whatever. But he’s streaming all the time and he’s just getting random people from Twitter on there. He’s getting guys that are like nationalists and stuff on there. He seems like he’s happy to talk to anyone.

So, yeah, someone clipped this. Drew, if you want to have a conversation, if you want to debate the issues of the day, discuss the issues of the day or whatever, a bit of content. I think it’ll get views, reach out, someone put us in touch. Let’s tee it up. I think it’d be interesting content. You know, I find Drew to be an interesting guy. He’s wrong about a lot of things, but he’s got a fun personality. I like his style. I find him to be a humourous interlocutor.

So let’s have a chat.

Blair Cottrell: He’s got lot of mental energy. I’ll give him that. He’s got a lot of mental energy. He posts on X like, 40 times a day.

Joel Davis: People are saying that it froze up when I said that. Is it still frozen?

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it is. That’s why I was laughing, because you’re like someone clipped this and it’s just like a blurry 144p.

[2:01:55]

Joel Davis: For fuck’s sake! I don’t know what’s going on with my Internet this evening.

Blair Cottrell: Look, man, we got to wrap it up. I gotta go. I’m sorry, guys. I’m having a good time!

Joel Davis: Yeah, Modern World Reject said, he threw a big Roman. He said:

“Indian stink!”

That’s the last Superchat, so we’ll end the show there.

Also, someone in the chat said debate Mike Enoch. Well, if he wants to have a discussion, I’ve had him on before.

Blair Cottrell: If I heard that Mike Enoch talks some shit about, not talked some shit about you, but how to go at you for your take on Iran, Israel situation.

Joel Davis: I think that was vindicated. Yeah, my take, that was vindicated. So look, I haven’t actually listened to that podcast, but people told me that too.

If you want to have a discussion, Mike. Yeah, I’m a fair guy. I’m happy to listen to his point of view. We agree on a lot of things, on most things. So be a fun conversation. Click this. If I’m not frozen, send it to the TRS guys, happy to talk to Mike, but yeah, I’m an open minded guy. I’m a fair guy willing to debate and discuss the issues.

So let’s talk about it.

Blair Cottrell: Before we, before we finish up. We’ve got a question for you. Is boredom a problem for you? Because I’ve realised you get like, you just have a brain that moves all the time. It’s always ticking over. It seems to be that way. Do you ever feel bored or like you’re battling boredom? Is that an issue for you?

Joel Davis: Not really. Only if I’m like forcibly subjected to something which is boring. But if I’m free to do my own thing, I’m never bored.

Blair Cottrell: So if you’re on your own, if you’re like spending periods of time during the day by yourself, like you’re not the sort of person who needs to distract yourself or find lots of things to do or think about. Like, you’re always okay with your own company. You’re always fine sitting there with your own thoughts, right?

Joel Davis: Yeah, I just, I feel like I don’t get enough time to myself.

Blair Cottrell: But yeah, no, I can relate to that. Yeah, it’s actually a good sign. Yeah, I noticed a lot of fixed personalities are like that. Like they always want more time to themselves and they seem to benefit by spending time with themselves. And I definitely fall into that category. I feel like I fall into that category, too.

But anyway, thanks for joining us, guys. We’ll see you guys next week, I guess. I’ve got a big weekend, so take care. Anything else, Joel, before we finish?

Joel Davis: No, just White power! Hail victory! Blood and honour! We’ll see you all next time.

Blair Cottrell: See you later, guys.

[2:04:38]

END

top

============================================

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/28/2025 = 21 )

BeamRider101
1 day ago
Foreign operatives paying criminals to stage hoax terrorism, to then get our speech laws changed, then the people in government changing those laws, failing to show up at the inquiry, is outrageous, normally it’d be instant dismissal and total overhaul of the government, but they appear to be getting away with it again.
11 likes

Report
BradC1988
1 day ago
Ban black cunts, not knives in Australia.
10 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
JFK was a real American
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
21 hours ago
The First Catholic POTUS
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
21 hours ago
Disgusting
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
1 day ago
China was created by jew with stolen intellectual properties just to create today’s war situation. All is pre-planned as covid was to murder legally especially young American solders, but to depopulate and destroy world usurious economy. Traitor Tramp is jewish puppet bitch. This all proofs that nothing would be changed through jew voting scum and evil democracy.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
Canada does the same thing, calling a homosexual a f-g is a $10,000 fine or jailtime.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
Did China turn on the jews under Ci Jinping?
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
mharrison52
21 hours ago
seeing us congressman calling for war with China, id say there’s a good chance. china is close to being nat soc if you really think about it.
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
1 day ago
Now it the time to register Party and nail jew for good to the coffin once and for all.
3 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Motown88
Supporter
22 hours ago
When Whites become a minority in AU there won’t be any special privilege for minorities like there is now… In fact, persecution will go into full blown legal discrimination. South Africa is the canary in the coal mine.
3 likes

Report
mikecleary84
1 day ago
blurryish
2 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
24:05 Blair that was fucking hilarious
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
I was laughing so hard at this my sides hurt
1 like

Report
hailslcants
1 day ago
hey guys
0 likes

Report
hailslcants
1 day ago
what time u starting u cants?
0 likes

Report
mikecleary84
1 day ago
good enough guys
0 likes

Report
BigotSmalls
Supporter
1 day ago
LFG crew. ORG 🌞 keep up with the conversation. Like share chalk.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
First 25 minutes of the show: Eldridge Colby policy William Colby his grandfather was head of CIA Anglo Americans, CIA was an Anglo organization but was couped by jews during WW2 and after JFK 1963/ replaced under LBJ Eldridge was in 1st Trump Admin and told them that China must be focused on at all costs or America will fall. His policy is intuitive, Netanyahu violated this policy by striking Iran. China is top supplier to Iran. Netanyahu is greedy and wants greater israel and cannot accept backseat. Iran is stronger than israel, and Net wants to sack US to defeat Iran. US public does not support this war. Not to mention Israel trade relationship with China.
0 likes

Report
Motown88
Supporter
21 hours ago
Your description of Gen X is lacking in understanding and knowledge… Probably has a lot to do with your millennial sense of entitlement.
0 likes

=================

ODESSY COMMENTS

22 comments

HyperChat minimums:
100 LBC
0
Doom Nebulae
16 hours ago
Why the fuck would you go fight China on behalf of ZOG?! This is beyond stupid.

6
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
Mike Enoch is obviously jewish in his physical appearance, and it’s confirmed by his jewish ex wife.

1
1
Hide replies
King Tut
4 hours ago
fuck Mike Enoch! every time he opens his mouth, all I hear is verbal diahreah. he is the reason why I could never get into TRS.

0
1
Cone of Silence
1 day ago
If you would like to broaden your purview on just how long, the US and us by proxy, have been subverted by Israel, the watch the last 2 episodes from Blackpilled.com

2
0
Reclaim
5 hours ago(edited)
some indian guy came to my office once and kept trying to show me his fancy watch and I was like dude, I really don’t care about such things.

1
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
Mike peinovich is jewish.

0
2

@EverybodywakeUp
2 hours ago
Blair hit it on the head with boomers, my mum is a boomer and she works so hard. Since she was 16, she can’t not work and always wants to be busy.

King Tut
5 hours ago
Jews aren’t just overplaying the holohoax card, but the “Nazi” card. recently at a US Senate hearing Kristi Noem and Ice were compared to “Nazis hunting down Jews” by some Jew or shabbos goy. it was pathetic! they basically saying you aren’t allowed to deport invaders who broke our laws and came to US illegally because if you do, you’re a “Nazi”.

Cecil
5 hours ago
china will take Taiwan without a shot. They have been infiltrating it for years and putting their own people in place

1
0

@CloudWhine
10 hours ago
Also, you mentioned there being ZERO evidence that Trump is a Russian Agent. I am not saying he is or isn’t, go watch the documentaries The Dubious Friends Of Donald Trump and Active Measures. Trumps deep financial ties to Russian crime and even Soviet actors goes back to the 80s and his close ties to Russian mob are undeniable. So, please review that information and revise your position. This is embarrassing.

@CloudWhine
10 hours ago
Your take on Taiwan is painfully misinformed. It is as if you are getting your information from people like McGregor and Ritter, two literal Russian sycophants. The COMMUNISTS didn’t fight alongside the Chinese Nationalists in ww2, they fled to the mountains, and when the war was over and the nationalists were beleaguered, they came down and took over. Taiwan was NEVER NEVER NEVER Part of the the CCP. Fuck China, Fuck Duginist multipolarity. Dugin is Anti White and Anti West, and youd know that if you actually listened to his long format interviews. He and Putin say their commitment to multiculturalism often. Let me guess, 4D chess? They have to say it? Forgive me if Im wrong and you know that he is a multiculturalist. Real reform looks like taking back our countries, not destroying them so 1 billion Chinese and 1 billion Indians can take over, and we get raped and killed in the aftermath. There is ZERO chance that have a Renaissance if we fall into disrepair. Our planned genocide is on the table, and will happen the second we become a punching bag for the world. Honestly, go get your information about taiwan from other sources than RT stooges or American politicians on the take from China.

1
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
have a good day everyone

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
thanks guys o/

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
He admitted it himself

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
^^^

Walther Mauser
1 day ago
Yep, Nature is racist. It is only natural.

scoobyburn
1 day ago
anti septic

warren-g
1 day ago

@ConeOfSilence
the last one was pretty good

Callaghan
1 day ago

@Daniel
1 day ago
Best show of the week coming up boys

@Daniel
1 day agoAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE

Callaghan
1 day ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

==========================

See Also

top

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript