Joel Davis: Okay, we should be live. It is the 4th of July, so if we’re in America, it would be Independence Day. But Obviously in Australia, 4th of July doesn’t mean anything. And interesting show for you tonight, I hope. Big show for you this evening, even though we are missing Blair. There’s a lot I wanted to break down, a lot I wanted to discuss. Blair’s sick, so I gave him the night off and decided to ride solo for this one.

 

So, yeah, you’re going to be getting two hours of me yapping, but presumably that’s what you’re all here for. So, sorry, I don’t have any Blair to kind of break it up. But it is what it is. The man’s sick. I think Mark Collett made him get out of bed early the 4 o’ clock in the morning or whatever for a Mark Collett stream the other day. And it kind of tipped him over the edge. It is winter down here in Australia and so he’s a bit under the weather.

 

But yeah, there’s a few big stories I wanted to touch tonight. The main thing I wanted to do, I’ve been doing a bit of a deep dive into Chinese politics lately and the last few days because there’s a lot of very interesting kind of subtle dynamics going on there. And it’s really interesting precisely because the timetable for potentially World War III kind of hinges upon Chinese politics. And that has massive implications for Australia, for America, for the world. So it’s hard to get good information and to kind of break through all the propaganda on both sides and figure out what’s happening because of the nature of the Chinese system. But I’ve done a considerable amount of reading and study.

 

And so I was going to set out my preliminary analysis this evening for all of you to kind of like red pill you on recent developments in China and what’s potentially happening and what to look for over the next few months as more signs will become evident as to what direction things are going at in Chinese politics where potentially, yeah, a lot hinges on kind of what happens over the next few months.

 

But before I get into that, there’s a few other stories. There’s a shocking story here in Australia with this, I think probably the most egregious child rape paedophile allegations I can remember in Australia. So there’s probably been something worse over the years, but I just don’t remember anything as bad as this. I pull this up here from The Noticer:

 

“Homosexual childcare worker charged with raping eight babies and toddlers. A homosexual child care worker has been charged with sexually abusing babies and toddlers at a child care centre in Point Cook, Melbourne. Alleged child rapist Joshua Dale Brown, 26, was arrested on May 12 and charged with 70 child sex offences against eight children aged between five months and two years old at Creative Gardens Early Learning centre, Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023. The charges included sexual penetration of a child under 12, sexual assault, sexual activity in the presence of a child, possess child abuse material for use through a carriage service and possess child abuse material. Brown, who appeared with pink and blue dyed hair in a Facebook photo with his boyfriend during the same time period he worked at the Point Cook centre, had no criminal record and had a valid working with children check. It has since been cancelled.”

 

“Victoria police said on Tuesday they are now investigating whether there are more victims as Brown worked at 20 child care centres around Melbourne between January 2017 and May 2025 and are examining evidence of an allegation at a second centre at Essendon. The alleged child sex predator appears in a photo at that centre shared on its Facebook page on March 21st for so-called Harmony Day with the caption, quote, ‘today we recognise Australia’s cultural diversity’. Brown also tested positive for a sexually transmitted disease and authorities have contacted the families of 1200 children who attended the same child care centres to urge them to get tested. The alleged paedophile first appeared in court in May, but a suppression order issued by Magistrate Michael White and applied for by police and the Office of Public Prosecutions meant the case could not be made public at the time.”

 

“But as the investigation has developed in scale, the need to notify more than 2, 600 families as a precaution became apparent. Suppression order was therefore revoked and police announced the charges and made the unusual decision to release the alleged child rapist name.”

 

Yeah, anyway, you can go read the whole thing on Noticer. I mean I read most of it, but I mean horrific! And look at, he’s gone to so many different child care centres. He’s flip-flopping around doing days at all these different child care centres.

 

And so now thousands of parents have to get their children tested for STDs. This is beyond fucked up! Like it’s actually like it’s hard to even believe this is even real from my point of view. Like it’s hard to, I mean I’m not denying that it’s real. It’s obviously real, but it’s hard to fathom. It’s hard to come to terms with that this is real, this is happening. And there’s a lot of obvious things that one could say about this. Right? You know, I’ve heard calls for:

 

“Oh, we need to ban men from working in child care centres!”

 

Probably not the most unreasonable thing in the world, but, like, wouldn’t that break, like, discrimination laws? The kind of contradictions of the system are kind of being shown up there. You know, obviously gay dudes, highly disproportionately paedophiles. That discussion has been opening up.

 

[06:20]

 

But I think the real discussions that are important here and that are pertinent here, are these. Number one, nobody in Australian politics with any kind of power or influence, no major political party is calling for the death penalty. This guy is raping kids. Some of them haven’t even turned one. This guy is raping children that young in a systematic, predatory way and filming it. He needs to die! Like, I don’t. Who’s going to come and debate me on this subject? Who’s going to offer the counter argument, no, we need to keep this guy alive. For what reason?

 

Pedophiles need to be executed. But particularly it’s a case like this. I mean it’s. How is it even, … Why the fuck did we get rid of the death penalty? And it’s just putrid that we have to breathe the same air that this scum breathes. It’s unacceptable. It’s an insult to the honour of our nation that someone can commit crimes like this against our children and stay alive. He needs to die! He needs to be put to death. Obviously the system won’t do that. And I’m seeing barely anyone call for this.

 

When we launch our political party. This is going to be one of key items on our platform. I think this is a message, a national conversation that we need to have. I think pretty much everyone in Australia agrees we need to put child rapists to death.

 

So that’s going to be one of the key issues I think that we’re going to attack, because we just need a far more serious response.

 

I mean, there’s too many cases. I mean, this person hasn’t been caught before, but there’s been too many cases of child rapists that have gone to jail, served short jail sentences, where they get held in protective custody so the other prisoners don’t kill them, released back into the community and then reoffend.

 

I mean, how is this even happening? How are we ever releasing someone who is a child rapist back onto the street ever! Like that’s just insane! That’s insane! It begs the question, the people making these decisions, why are they so lenient? Is it because they themselves are engaging in this kind of behaviour? Why are politicians not doing anything about this? Is it because they themselves are engaging in this kind of behaviour? It really does beg the question. Why else would you try to protect paedophiles unless you are one yourself, or you’re working with them in some systematic way or somethings surely this is something that we can all agree on. Left-wing, Right-wing. It’s just disgusting!

 

I mean, second thing that I also would like to say about this is another key policy that we’re going to be putting forward in this country. We have the child care rebate. Now I’ll look into this. Actually, I’ll look it up right now. How much is the average child care rebate a year for working mothers in Australia? Looking it up right now. So there’s child care studies, subsidies.

 

So the child care subsidy percentage decreases as family income increases. For instance, families earning up to 80,000 may receive up to a 90% subsidy, while those earning above $530,000 a year are not eligible. So what it’s saying here is, basically if you earning like an average wage, the government basically pays for your kid to go to childcare. If you’ve got children under school age. Why are we paying? Like if the mother of the child literally can’t afford to pay for child care, why are we subsidizing that? Why don’t instead of paying mothers to dump their kids at like random child care centres run by foreigners infested with paedophiles so they can get raped? How about instead of that, we pay that money to mothers to stay home and take care of their own children.

 

In society today you can be moralistic about it. Mothers should be taking care of their own children. And I agree with that. But obviously economically it’s quite difficult today to have stay at home mothers. You know, it’s difficult to raise a family on one income and for many reasons related to cost of living.

 

So what’s the number one thing that we could do if we want to increase the birth rate and protect children, pay mothers to stay home! I think that’d be an incredibly popular policy. Popular with women and with men. Right? Most men would like their missus to stay home and take care of the house and take care of the kids. The state should pay. That’s a social good. The state should pay for it. Taxpayers, I’d rather pay my taxes so that White mothers can stay at home raising White babies, then paying child care subsidies so they can go and work and send their kid off to some like, paedophile rape centre. So we can protect the kids. We can get the mothers back in the homes so the kids are raised properly. People will have more children because women, won’t be as busy with their careers. They’ll be able to have more children, feel more comfortable to have more children, be incentivised to have more children because they’ll probably get bigger payments the more children they have.

 

And then we won’t need immigration anymore to expand the population. I mean, it’s just a beautiful policy. Everyone wins. It’d be an expensive policy, but we’ve got like 15% of the country on NDIS, the disability insurance scheme. Most of them are rorting it. Most of them are capable of working and just have like a diagnosis, like a bullshit, like psychology diagnosis to allow them to just grift off the system. Got all these like immigrants that come here from the Middle East and just sit on Centerlink grift off that. So many people are grifting off this system. If we shut down all those grifts and redirected that money to young White mothers to have White babies. I’d much rather they be the ones grifting. I’d much rather reproduction be the grift. A lot of people say:

 

“Oh, how are you going to get women to vote for Nazis? How are you going to get women to vote for nationalism?”

 

I think this is a pretty fucking good policy that we can get their votes on, but men as well. We want to be able to bring back the Australian dream, raising a family on one income.

 

[12:56]

 

So I think this issue here really just illustrates how great policies like this just don’t exist in the political system. Like, no one’s really interested in trying to fix the major social problems of our time that have very simple solutions that no one talks about, no one thinks of, that would be 90% of the country behind you, popular. So I think we can really do some damage in a political system like this, presenting these kinds of ideas to the people.

 

I think a lot of people are going to be very pleasantly surprised:

 

“How come the Nazis have such good policies? What the fuck!”

 

And yeah, we can hopefully move the debate onto our terms. And yeah, but I mean, just disgusting the story. I mean, what else can you say about it? We just got to kill this fucker. We’re not advocating for to do anything illegal, but he needs to be legally executed, anyway.

 

Another I’m not going to go into another issue. I’m going to focus on this China thing because there’s a lot to unpack.

 

So basically what I’ve been looking into lately is there’s been a lot of rumours swirling that President Xi Jinping in China is, his power is being curtailed, basically. That his grip on power is significantly slipping, that other elements within the Chinese Communist Party are reasserting themselves. And there’s many reasons why people are suspecting this. And I heard this at first months ago and I suspected it was Western propaganda and the type of thing you hear all the time:

 

“Oh, Vladimir Putin is going to drop dead, he has cancer, he’ll die within six months!”

 

Or you hear these kinds of stories all the time, but very rarely does anything materialise. So I didn’t really look into it too much because I kind of dismissed it as typical Western propaganda. But after taking a serious look at what these people are saying, I think that are calling this out, it does seem that there’s no smoke without fire on this. It does seem like there’s something to there’s been a whole series of purges of high ranking members of the PLA, the Chinese military, of generals appointed by Xi, that was, Xi loyalists that have been taken out, whether they’ve died, been in prison, disappeared from public life, been forced to step down, what have you. A very large amount of these things have occurred.

 

There’s been more critique on Xi’s policies in Chinese major publications, particularly his policy on Taiwan, but also his economic policies. And yeah, the Chinese economy isn’t doing so well. They’re hurdling towards potentially a major war with the United States over Taiwan. If they play that situation in a particular way.

 

And so it would make sense actually that certain elements within the party would maybe try to assert themselves at this time. Apparently rumours were, because basically the way that the Chinese system works, every five years you have, they have like a big, you know, general meeting, like conference where all the members of the party come together and like all the senior members of the party and like vote on the direction of the party and so on. And the last time this happened was in 2022.

 

And I remember at the time it was significant because the previous president, Hu Jintao, was kind of publicly disgraced. Xi kind of ceremonially in front of all the cameras, had him kind of like marched out of the meeting. And he represents like the Communist Youth League faction, which is a faction of more moderate elements within the Chinese Communist Party. Xi’s faction is more nationalistic and militaristic and authoritarian, whereas this other faction is more liberal in the sense that obviously they’re still communists and they’re still like technically and they still support like a one party state, but they support more economic liberalisation, more capitalism, more opening of China to foreign markets, a better kind of better relationship with the United States, a less hostile relationship with the United States, and they want to maintain more kind of stability and diplomacy for foreign policy, economic policy, etc. And Xi kind of won out against them.

 

And then over the years since he became president has made a series of moves to essentially like stack the party with loyalists to him and to his agenda and kind of sideline all these other factions. And leaders of these old factions often get referred to as the so-called party elders now because they once held the highest positions in the party and are very famous in China. And you know, they’ve made note kind of in subtle ways, they don’t explicitly criticise the party or Xi, but in subtle ways they make it known that they don’t approve of Xi’s militarism towards Taiwan and kind of more aggressive and assertive foreign policy.

 

[18:45]

 

But what’s interesting is that at the, as I said, every five years they have a big meeting and then they have what they call plenary sessions, which are their like major meetings that they have once every year or like less than every year, maybe every 10 months or so, roughly speaking, I can’t remember exactly. And it’s kind of like the leaders of the party get together and decide what the direction of the party is going to be.

 

At the most recent of these meetings last year, there were all these rumours that he was sick. There wasn’t very much footage put out by Chinese State media of him really doing anything at the meeting or presiding over much. And it was presented that these party elders, so to speak, that Xi had sidelined were now involved and were talking at the meeting and were, and it was kind of spun:

 

“Oh, Xi is trying to show unity by being graceful and allowing his old fashioned rivals to come and participate in the plenary session.”

 

But in retrospect that seems like a cope, because ever since that plenary session, Xi’s public role has greatly diminished. Recently they just had like a BRICS meeting. He didn’t even go. And there’s been several big events and big meetings where he hasn’t really attended. Many are speculating he has health issues, which is probably part of that.

 

But let’s say he does have health issues. He has no obvious successor. It would make sense that that would undermine him, people’s confidence in him and his agenda. Because if he’s gonna drop dead or become too sick to be president, then the obvious question of, well, who’s going to take over from him comes into play. And it seems like elements within the elite, even though many of them were allies of Xi at one time or another, many of them have turned against him.

 

One of these, according to rumours, top military figures that have turned against him is General Zhang Yuga, which is basically the most senior kind of military figure in China. You know, basically only Xi really outranks him in military matters. He is the Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission.

 

And basically it’s the guy that’s like running the military. He’s kind of getting on a bit. He’s getting old. I think he’s in his 70s, and he was kind of in line to be potentially replaced by generals that were installed by Xi below him. And I can’t remember all the Chinese names. I’m not going to like list off all the names, but basically those guys that were kind of earmarked to kind of succeed him, and everyone was expecting to succeed him, have recently been purged. They’re Xi loyalists, which has kind of been shocking news, and many other high ranking officials across the military.

 

Meanwhile, Zhang Yuga in his public statements on Taiwan is a very different line to Xi. I can break this down a little bit. Xi’s vision on Taiwan, which is kind of nuanced and complex. So since Xi has come to power, his rhetoric on Taiwan has become progressively more and more aggressive. It kind of peaked just before Covid then it kind of let off a little bit, and then once Covid was over, it’s been even more aggressive.

 

So Taiwan, for those who don’t know, according to the official position of the Taiwanese government and the official position of the Chinese government, Taiwan is not a separate country. Taiwan is a part of China, and it simply has a different government.

 

And this is a layover from after the Second World War. You had an alliance between the old Nationalist government and the Communists, where they ceased their civil war and made an alliance to fight the Japanese in World War II. After the Japanese were defeated, they went back to fighting each other. The Communists won. Mao Zedong took over China, established Communist China. And the Nationalists were essentially chased off the mainland onto the island of Taiwan in 1949 or whatever.

 

And at first, the Americans backed the Nationalists against the Communists. This is the beginning of the Cold War, as you might expect. There was even, like General MacArthur, I believe, proposed that the United States should nuke China to try and like, nip Communism in the bud, which probably would have been the right move in retrospect. It was chosen against. There was obviously the Korean War with the Chinese kind of helped North Koreans fight against South Koreans, which were backed by the United States and us and other Western powers.

 

And so there’s a lot of tension there. And there was a view that the Nationalists could maybe somehow get a foothold back in the mainland and take the mainland back from the Communists. And the Americans backed the Chinese government in absentia that basically had formed in Taiwan, that still had ambitions to go and take Beijing back and take China back.

 

But of course, that never materialised. And this was a kind of quasi fascistic, nationalist authoritarian regime that was running Taiwan, but backed by the United States.

 

Fast forward to the 70s when it became clear that the Nationalists were never going to take China back, and the Communist Party had kind of consolidated power. Then President Nixon and his Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, they normalised relations with China and they agreed, because basically they wanted to, during the Cold War, they wanted to basically drive a rift deeper between China and Russia or China and the Soviet Union. They noticed that the Soviet Union and China, even though they were both communist states, they didn’t see eye to eye on a lot of issues. Mao in particular, was very upset after Stalin died. Khrushchev took over the Soviet Union, put out the secret speech basically condemning Stalinism as excessively totalitarian and brutal and so on. He saw this as a betrayal of Communism and of the revolution. Mao, that is, and kind of viewed the Soviets as moderates, as kind of moderates who were infected with bourgeois sensibilities or whatever. And there was territorial disputes between the Chinese and the Soviet Union.

 

[25:31]

 

And so even though they were both communist states that were aligned in many ways, they didn’t see eye to eye. And the Americans saw this as an opportunity to go in there, make a deal with China, make an economic deal with China to normalise relations somewhat, get China hooked on trade with the United States, and therefore neutralise them to isolate the Soviet Union strategically. Obviously this was an effective strategy. The Cold War was over with less than two decades later, the Soviet Union collapsed.

 

But the United States never went back to re-isolating China or didn’t perpetuate the Cold War. Even though the communists were still in power in China. The Americans declared the Cold War was over, Communism was defeated, liberalism had won.

 

And then they adopted a policy of liberal internationalism, a policy that basically, if we just integrate the countries of the world into enough international institutions that are quote, unquote, “liberal” and integrate everyone’s economies with one another through the globalisation of international trade, and we had globalised culture and everyone gets kind of draughted into this Pax Americana-Judeo, global slop of the post Cold War, you know, Pax Americana, international order. The elites of every country in the world will develop so many business relationships and diplomatic relationships and so on with the elites of all the other countries in the world, mediated by America and the West. But they’re all basically just copy and paste liberal democracy into their societies, engage in liberal, democratic reforms. Everyone will become a liberal democracy, and they’ll all sit together at the UN and shake hands and we won’t have any major World Wars anymore. And everyone’s economies will become so interdependent with one another that they won’t want to go to war because their economies aren’t sufficiently isolated that they could take each other on.

 

Instead, they’re so dependent upon trade with other countries that they work out their problems diplomatically and we all sing Kumbaya and everyone’s like a liberal forever. And there’s no more wars and there’s no more evil dictators. And this is the bullshit vision that was put forward.

 

And so even though China was still a communist authoritarian state, the idea was:

 

“Well, if we just let China, we just pretend that the Chinese are cool and allow them to participate in all international liberalism and globalism, then eventually the Chinese elite will adopt liberal ideas and engage in liberal reforms and China will liberalise over time, and we won’t have to fight China and force them to kind of succumb to liberalism. They’ll do it organically.”

 

This was the theory. And it seemed to be kind of working for a time because the Chinese leadership did get progressively more liberal. Every new leader that came in was less and less authoritarian, less and less radical in terms of their Marxist beliefs, more and more open to economic liberalism, opening up Chinese markets. They didn’t, you know, create Democratic, liberal, democratic reforms, but they were more liberal on economics and they were more open on diplomacy. They weren’t very aggressive in asserting their interests on the world stage.

 

And so the Chinese were not viewed as a major threat. And the idea was that if we just make the Chinese and American economies so integrated and dependent upon one another that China relies upon selling cheap crap to the United States and America relies upon buying all these key items from China, this will create a kind of natural friendship and alliance that prevent the two states from going to war.

 

Then along comes the rise of President Xi in the early 2010s, early to mid 2010s. And Xi is a nationalist, Xi is an authoritarian and he had more aggressive views for China’s potential. For Xi the Chinese are the centre of the world. The Chinese traditionally and there’s some truth to this. For a lot of human history, China was the biggest and wealthiest empire on the planet. You know, the Chinese empires existed for literally like five millennia or something in various forms. They’re an ancient people, an ancient civilisation, and there’s 1.4 billion of them.

 

Imagine if all of Europe was integrated into one big like super state. That’s basically what China is in terms of its size and its complexity. And the view was:

 

“Well we’ve become so rich now through all of this economic development that we’ve done that we can invest that money in developing a modern military outfit that can compete with the United States and we can assert ourselves and the United States is falling. The United States has declining internal legitimacy, all these internal problems. We can rise and challenge the American led liberal international order with an assert a different way. And we can assert Chinese interests and try to dominate the Asian region and become the most powerful country in the world and kind of replace the United States as the top dog.”

 

And key to that is taking Taiwan.

 

So why is Taiwan key to it? Well, number one, it’s kind of like a disgrace to China that Taiwan, which they consider to be part of China, is being run by a now liberal democracy.

 

So after the Cold War ended, Taiwan shifted from being a one party authoritarian nationalist state to being a liberal democracy.

 

And so the Kuomintang, the old nationalists that used to run China and that pushed into Taiwan and were running Taiwan under Chiang Kai-shek* and so on, they now had to win an election of the Taiwanese people to hold on to government.

 

[* Chiang Kai-shek-Chinese politician, military leader, and President of Taiwan from 1950 to 1975 (1887–1975) Chiang Kai-shek was a Chinese politician, revolutionary, and general who led the Republic of China from 1928 until his death in 1975. His government was based in mainland China until it was defeated in the Chinese Civil War by the Chinese Communist Party in 1949, after which he continued to lead the Republic of China on the island of Taiwan. Chiang served as leader of the Nationalist Kuomintang party and the commander-in-chief of the National Revolutionary Army from 1926 until his death, during which he was known as Generalissimo. Wikipedia.]

 

[31:58]

 

And by the time you get to the 2000s, they start losing and you get the rise of the Democratic People’s Party or whatever it is, which is basically the Taiwanese libtards. Taiwanese Leftists who advocate for bringing in immigrants into Taiwan, who advocate for gay marriage, who advocate for basically trying to join the West and adopt Western so-called Western, basically like American libtard values.

 

And also each generation that is born in Taiwan, if you look at the polling, they consider themselves Taiwanese more and more and Chinese less and less.

 

So when they started doing polling on this back in the 1990s, the vast majority of the people of Taiwan when they asked them what’s your ethnicity? They said “I’m Chinese”. Now the vast majority of Taiwanese people in particularly young people say “we’re Taiwanese, I’m not Chinese”. And a minority identifies as Chinese.

 

So the Taiwanese have begun to see themselves as a distinct people. They identify with liberal, democratic, so-called western values. And yeah, they keep getting voted back in these Taiwanese libtards. And the Kuomintang who’s like, I guess the Taiwanese Right-wing conservative like Boomer Party, they say:

 

“Let’s not upset China. Like yes, like one day there is only one China and yes, one day we’ll reunify.”

 

But they tried to kind of maintain this perpetual status quo instead the Taiwanese libtards that are in power basically kind of pushing the envelope and getting more, not outright stating like full on Taiwanese independence, but basically almost saying that. And this is a big deal.

 

Like pretty much no country in the world recognises Taiwan as an independent state. Like technically on paper. America doesn’t, Australia doesn’t. Almost no one does because the Chinese have, in order to normalise relations with them, they insist that you have to, you can’t accept Taiwan is a legitimate state. They don’t have a seat at the UN. There are so they’re in a very interesting weird position.

 

And the leaders before Xi, when he took power were kind of conciliatory towards Taiwan. Like:

 

“Yes, as long as Taiwan accepts that there’s only one China and they don’t assert their independence, we’re chill with that. And one day we hope that we can peacefully reunify into like one political system.”

 

But they weren’t really pressing the issue. In the 1990s I believe there was a dispute under the Clinton administration era there was a dispute between China and Taiwan over like I think it was when the Taiwanese held their first Democratic election. I think that the Chinese didn’t appreciate that they preferred the Kuomintang to be in power because I guess they correctly assessed that the Kuomintang was going to be more pro-Beijing than what would come out of democracy, which is a more Westernised, anti-Chinese version of Taiwan. And anyway, strongly opposed the whole election procedure, I think it was in like 1996 or something.

 

And the way that Clinton responded as President of the United States was just to send some carrier strike groups through the Taiwanese straight and say:

 

“What are you going to do?”

 

Basically. At that time, China was so militarily weak compared to the United States that they just had to cuck out and just kind of watch the United States flex on them like that. The elections went ahead and Taiwan became a democracy.

 

Cycle forward to today and China’s way more powerful than it was back then they have invested a lot obviously in building up their navy, their air force, rocket tech, etc. They’re not at the level of the United States, but they’ve closed the gap in a very big way.

 

And after Covid, I remember 2022, I think I remember like Nancy Pelosi, she went to go and visit Taiwan and this caused a big stir because she was like Speaker of the House, so she was like third in line for the American leadership at the time, below the Vice President. And she flew to Taiwan to do a visit and she was the highest Ranking, I think US official to visit Taiwan in like 25 years since the events I just described, I think basically. And the Chinese freaked out and started doing all these military drills and shooting rockets over Taiwan and flying fighter jets all over Taiwan and practicing like invading Taiwan and stuff, doing like live drills with their navy and this kind of thing. Obviously with the intent of, basically freaking the Taiwanese out, saying “don’t take any steps towards independence, like you’re ours, bitch” kind of thing.

 

And Xi, in his public statements on Taiwan or official statements on Taiwan when he first came to power, there were a lot more tame. There was an assertion that Taiwan would be reunified with China.

 

But as time went on into the late 2010s and the 2020s, Xi statements have become more forceful, saying basically that option that we’d like to do it peacefully, but there’s other options on the table. If Taiwan makes a move towards independence, will invade, basically.

 

And anyway, this is a big deal because a war, an invasion of Taiwan isn’t just an invasion of Taiwan. The United States is basically committed to protecting Taiwan. And the reason why they’re committed to protecting Taiwan isn’t just to fuck with China or because they care about Taiwanese democracy, or something. It’s strategic.

 

Basically, if you look at the geography of East Asia, where Taiwan is very key strategic real estate. Because basically all the shipping lanes that connect Japan and South Korea through Southeast Asia, to the Middle East and to Europe all go past Taiwan. If China controls Taiwan, they’re able essentially to more effectively navally blockade Japan and Korea.

 

[38:31]

 

Now, that’s significant because Japan and Korea are highly dependent upon imports by sea. Korea only has a land border with one country, North Korea, which then is connected to Russia and China. So they need access to the sea to have access to the rest of the world, basically outside of Chinese control or North Korean control, which are probably even worse from their perspective.

 

Japan has no land borders with anyone. They have to trade by sea. And Japan doesn’t have natural resources in any substantial number. Japan is utterly dependent upon importing natural resources, even importing food. I believe. They don’t actually have enough agriculture to sustain their population. There’s like 120 million people on that island. They can’t feed them unless they can get ships in and out.

 

Basically, they’re highly dependent upon international trade. So if the Chinese were to navally blockade Japan or Korea, it could bring either of these states to their knees very quickly. They could cause famines. They could completely collapse their economies.

 

So if the United States doesn’t guarantee their security, basically they would be forced to cuck to China. They would be forced to sign a whole bunch of agreements subordinating themselves to China. And that would enable China to become a hegemon over East Asia. They’d have other political and military control over East Asia.

 

And that has massive ramifications, because that would mean Australia’s position becomes precarious. All the other countries in Southeast Asia becomes precarious. A lot of them, the Philippines, Vietnam, a lot of these states would be like a cascade effect. America would lose its ability to have bases. Right now, I think the Americans have like 50,000 personnel or something stationed in South Korea. They’ve still got bases there from the Korean War that they maintain. They’ve got obviously an alliance with Japan. Japan’s the most powerful country in East Asia that America is aligned with. If they lose Korea and Japan, their whole strategic position relative to China collapses.

 

And then all these other states, like I said, would then lose confidence in the United States to defend them. They would also then cuck to China. Maybe even Australia would cuck to China at that point, because there would be this cascade effect. China would become a regional hegemon. China would grow in global prestige. China would then be able to start projecting power beyond East Asia into the rest of the world. It would be a massive shift in global power dynamics.

 

So Taiwan is one little island of like 25 million people, right? It seems insignificant, but it’s not. Because from the Japanese and the Korean perspective, if America is not willing to defend Taiwan, they’re going to lose confidence that they’ll defend them and so on, right? The dominoes go from there.

 

So the United States has to project power in the region. It has to say:

 

“No, these are our regional partners. We will fight to defend them.”

 

Because that’s what holds together the network of alliances that keeps China kind of like locked in, where all the, these island countries and Southeast Asian countries that encircle China, whether it be the Philippines, Vietnam, you know, Indonesia even, and so on, Australia, this whole chain of countries, them all being aligned with the United States, locks China out, basically. They can’t build military bases on their territories. They can’t flex over them diplomatically, politically, and so on and force them to do whatever they want because they’re the big dog. Well, the United States and the Americas can do that they can flex on Canada, they can flex on Mexico, they can flex on all the countries around them because they’re just so much more dominant and powerful. Who’s going to come and defend Mexico against the United States? Who’s going to come and defend Canada against the United States? No one.

 

So America is able to throw its weight around. That’s how China would be able to kind of behave under these kinds of circumstances.

 

Basically, yeah, there’s a whole other series of technical advantages to Taiwan. China doesn’t have, like a deep drop into the Pacific Ocean. So there’s kind of like a, … The Pacific Ocean is very deep, right, like most big oceans are.

 

But as you get closer to China, the undersea kind of ground level, whatever you call that, it raises quite significantly. So when China drop a submarine off the coast of China, it can be detected, because of the [low] depth, by sensors.

 

However, if you drop a submarine off Taiwan, you get this radical kind of cliff drop basically on the eastern side of Taiwan straight into the Pacific Ocean. So in theory, Chinese nuclear subs could, if they control Taiwan, could be dropped off the east coast of Taiwan into the Pacific Ocean and be undetectable to the United States. Meaning the Chinese could sail nuclear subs all the way to the other side of the Pacific without the United States detecting them, because they could sail them at like maximum depth the whole way. That’s pretty serious because they got nuclear subs that would provide first strike capabilities or counter strike capabilities, or whatever, in the event of a nuclear exchange.

 

So there’s a lot of key, like strategic dynamics at play over who controls Taiwan.

 

Also, from the United States perspective, if China was to move on Taiwan, they would be upsetting the regional balance of power, like I said. It would give the Americans an excuse to go to war with China. Because now they’re saying:

 

“We’re just defending Taiwan, we’re defending our allies, right?”

 

And because China would anticipate that, they would probably actually attack Japan, Korea, other states at the same time they attack Taiwan, potentially under certain kind of like war game scenarios, it’s projected.

 

[45:50]

 

So the United States, the argument goes, maybe it’s in their interest to fight China now because if you leave it 100 years or 50 years China could keep developing, developing, developing, developing, and become so militarily powerful that they’re harder to beat 50 years down the track than they are now.

 

So the idea is you kind of bitch slap them now, put them back in their place, because a war with China over Taiwan is far preferable to a war with China somewhere closer to the United States, or a war with China after they’ve already got Japan and Korea and these other states on their side and consolidated power and have grown stronger. And now maybe they’re getting involved in South American politics or they’re getting involved in European politics or Middle Eastern politics or something, and you’re fighting China in another part of the world.

 

The advantage for the Americans of fighting them over Taiwan is that it’s right in China. Basically, it’s right off the coast of China. America can send all their navy, air force, whatever, and just blow up as much in China as they possibly can.

 

And at the same time, they can navally blockade China in Southeast Asia. China is also utterly dependent on international shipping that goes through Southeast Asia to connect it to the Middle East and to Europe. China doesn’t have enough natural resources, resources to sustain itself. It doesn’t even have enough food to sustain itself. It needs to import a lot of stuff. Also, its economy is entirely built around exports.

 

So the US strategy, they don’t necessarily even have to defend the island of Taiwan successfully. They can just blow up a bunch of shit in China, try and blow up as much of China’s military hardware as possible, and then set up a blockade in Southeast Asia that stops China from basically being connected to the rest of the world through shipping, and then wait and watch as China internally kind of destabilises. And win the war that way. That would probably be their strategy.

 

So, however, if you allow China to kind of develop and all these Southeast Asian countries to become allies of China because you didn’t fight them over Taiwan, setting up that naval blockade becomes way more difficult because maybe all those states are now Chinese allies and they’re going to be enemies of the United States. They’re going to allow the Chinese to build naval installations. They’re not going to allow the Americans to bring their navy into their region or whatever.

 

So, yeah, international politics is a confidence game. If all these states have confidence in American power, they’ll back it. If they’ll cuck to China. That’s how it works. So Taiwan is just like this first domino in this chain effect of strategic ramifications.

 

Now, this is significant because ultimately the ball is in China’s court. The United States can’t force China to invade Taiwan. Maybe they could try and convince the Taiwanese to do something suicidal, like declare independence or something and really provoke it, but they can’t ultimately decide what China does. China decides what China does.

 

Now, Xi Jinping, in his kind of aggressive foreign policy, has only really been kind of pushing Taiwan away, making Taiwan fear invasion seem inevitable, getting the Americans to basically see invasion as potentially on the horizon, prepare for a war with China. Trump’s foreign policy is a large aspect of it is really geared towards containing China, like the tariff policies and so on. There’s people in the Trump administration, like Elbridge Colby, I think his name is, and others who are national security advisors who are just like China hawks, who just say that basically everything should be focused on containing China. Fuck Russia, fuck the Middle East, we should just make peace deals and forget about it and just take all of our military hardware, concentrate it in East Asia and get ready to fight China or try and deter China from going to war with us. So that School of thought is developing in the United States because of Xi’s actions.

 

And basically, the longer that the current trajectory of things, or Xi’s basically kind of led trajectory of things continues, the closer and closer World War III gets, basically. So that’s like the strategic context.

 

Meanwhile, Xi had spent years concentrating power, purging rival factions, stuffing the party full of his allies.

 

But then in the last year, you’re seeing a kind of a bit of like a backflip. A lot of his allies getting purged, his public appearances like I said earlier, being curtailed. The tone in the media, he’s getting criticised. Not openly directly criticised but getting indirectly criticised by a lot of people and then other rivals, other old heads basically in the Chinese Communist Party not directly criticising his Taiwan policy but advocating for a far more restrained Taiwan policy in their public statements, including this Zhang Yuga guy who is the 2IC [Second in Charge] over military affairs. Basically the guy running the Chinese military who’s presiding over a lot of these purges that happening to these Xi’s top guys, who basically is the highest Ranking dude in the Chinese military structure.

 

So it’s interesting because what it seems like is that however internal dynamics have been seized its hard to tell from the outside. It seems like there’s been a move against Xi. Not necessarily that he’s going to get replaced as leader although there’s some speculation that he could be literally about to be replaced. That would be very uncharacteristic. Usually they don’t. Someone’s elected to do a five year term that would mean Xi’s term doesn’t end till 2027 that it would continue. But he’s being sidelined. There was an announcement a few days ago that a so-called joint decision making body was being created at the top of the CCP and Xi Jinping, you know, has really kind of pushed for a long time. He is the leader. His interpretation of policy is the prevailing interpretation and China will be strong if basically it subordinates itself to him and his leadership. And that’s the way a lot of the top officials in the Communist Party were talking for years. Now the tone has shifted. Now they’re talking about power sharing and committees of decision makers and how everyone in the party needs to be included like the party leadership in decision making. We need to create more committees and have more what they call Democratic Centralism which basically means there’s one central decision making body but within that body you have democracy. So the Chinese people don’t have democracy but the party leadership collaboratively make decisions.

 

[51:56]

 

So they’re trying to cuck Xi, strip him of his kind of authoritarian power and kind of subordinate him to the other elements within the party. There is a rise in prominence of the so-called party elders who represent this more liberal view that I was describing earlier.

 

And the backdrop of this is also that the Chinese economy is slowing. So my view, Ron Unz put this view forward with some compelling evidence. I remember a few years ago, and I think it makes sense, is that Covid was probably a bioweapon created by an element of the United States government. I don’t know which element, whether it was a rogue element or it was directly under Trump himself ordered it to be done or what, we don’t know, I don’t know exactly. But some element within the US Government unleashed that bioweapon on China.

 

And I think it also had a secondary purpose of facilitating all these economic policy or financial policy actions where basically in the United States the economy was hurtling towards really difficult times. Covid happens they just then flood the market with all of this money to prop it up by basically bailing out all the major companies, all the major banks, basically massive wealth transfer, just giving trillions and trillions of dollars to the American financial elite. That’s basically what they did during Covid.

 

And no one was in the streets protesting it like they were after the global financial crisis because everyone was arguing about vaccine mandates and vaccines and lockdowns and blah, blah, blah, Covid shit! Because everyone was arguing about Covid bullshit, no one was arguing about:

 

“What the fuck! The richest people in the world just stole $15 trillion off us. What are we going to do about it?”

 

Well, no one did anything.

 

And I think that was basically like the psyop. Like they, it was like a sleight of hand. Like we can’t just do another 2008 style bank bailout. So fabricate this bullshit crisis that gets all the goys into this false paradigm, and we’ll have them argue within that space for a year and a half and then once we’ve transferred $15 trillion to the financial elite, we’ll just close the paradigm and then we’ll just pretend like everything’s gone back to normal. Which is what happened! That’s literally what happened!

 

There was no permanent vaccine passports or what. Remember everyone was saying:

 

“If you don’t get the vaccine, you’re going to get put in a camp and vaccines are going to kill everyone!”

 

And all this kind of stuff.

 

And obviously the vaccines were fucked up! I’m very glad I didn’t get one. And who knows what the long term effects of those things are going to be. It’s kind of scary to think about. But I think a lot of the catastrophe, the kind of catastrophism that many people had, has been shown to be false because everyone hasn’t dropped dead. There’s some evidence that it’s had an impact on fertility. I saw a study recently that about a third. It’s got like a 33% drop basically in the fertility of women who got the vax versus the ones who didn’t. Something like that, which is significant.

 

But I don’t know. I didn’t read the study closely enough to know if it was controlled for the fact that a lot of the women who didn’t get the vax are also quite conservative. So wouldn’t they be more like as a demographic, be more likely to have more children? Because you know, when I think about the kind of women I know they didn’t get the vax. Usually they’re very Right-wing, very conservative, very traditional. A lot of Christians didn’t get the vaccine because they thought it had something to do with the mark of the Beast and the book of Revelation. People who are into conspiracy theories, people who are in the dissident Right who listen to Right-wing memes. We’re the kind of demographic that didn’t get the vax, the non-conformist types. Well, we’re also probably a demographic that are more likely to have kids at higher rates because we kind of reject the mainstream programming, eat healthier, have more traditional values and so on.

 

So I don’t know if that’s all it is. Just like the vax was predominantly taken by people that are libtards and normies and they just got a lower birth rate than Right-wingers, or if there’s something actually in the vax that’s causing the fertility issue. But whatever the case may be, the consequences don’t seem to have been as catastrophic as what people were saying.

 

So while they had you arguing about that, this is what they were doing.

 

[56:35]

 

But I also think part of why they released Covid specifically in Wuhan in China is in order to basically try and slow down the Chinese economy. Because prior to Covid, the Chinese economy was growing at breakneck speed. It was growing like two or three times as fast as the United States economy and had been for decades. So China’s flying and they’re building up their military power. Xi is in power. He is the strongest leader since Mao, most consolidated authoritarian leader since Mao. Militaristic, nationalistic, getting more and more aggressive on Taiwan, more and more assertive in the world.

 

Something needed to be done to slow this mother fucker down! Boom! Covid! Drop Covid in China. What happens to Asians when they think that there’s a disease happening? They freak the fuck out! I remember like it was all the Chinese that bought all the toilet paper and stuff when Covid broke out and you couldn’t get toilet paper for months, it was a nightmare because Asians are hyper anxious people and Asians would always wear masks whenever they get sick, even before Covid. That’s part of their culture because Asians are bug people who live in giant cities full of millions of people. Disease spreads very easily in Asian societies and so they’ve culturally adapted to be more threat avoidant and neurotic about diseases than White people because we don’t live in the same kind of environments on average.

 

So it’s also why conservatives and people who live in the countryside were less freaked out than inner city like libtard cosmopolitans because they’re more like Asians. They live in these kind of more clustered environments where they have contact with more humans per day and so they’re more neurotic and so on about these things.

 

But anyway, the point is that you drop a disease like that in China, it’s going to shut down the economy. And it did that very effectively. China’s economy still hasn’t recovered from Covid, like their official figures still look kind of decent, but if you really scratch beneath the surface and you look at the underlying numbers, the Chinese economy hasn’t recovered from Covid. It’s actually slowed down to about the pace of the United States economy in terms of its growth. And yeah, there’s a lot of structural problems with the Chinese economy. Like you can see they’re claiming publicly that the economy is growing at 5% and everything’s fine. But youth unemployment is high. And look at the underlying numbers.

 

Like if you look at prices, house prices, industrial goods prices and so on, these prices are stagnating or falling, which indicates a lack of demand. So it means people don’t have money, businesses don’t have money, people don’t have money to buy houses, to invest in expanding business operations, whatever.

 

So that shows that there’s some structural problems inside the economy. You know, in China, it’s hard to trust any statistics that come out of China because there’s all these incentives to lie because they, everything’s managed by central committees and those central committees are assessed based upon these metrics. So of course they’re going to lie about the metrics to make themselves look better. And everything in Chinese, you know, culture is about saving face and not appearing weak, not appearing incompetent or whatever.

 

So I think it’s quite clear the Chinese economy has slowed down. Covid was very effective in doing that. It slowed down international trade, which China’s dependent upon. It also just literally caused all these lockdowns all through China that went on for ages. That this like zero Covid policy that persisted for a long, very long time. Their lockdowns went on longer than any other country. They were still doing lockdowns I think in 2022, when everyone else was open and back to normal. So that really fucked them up. And there’s a lot of evidence that the Americans released it.

 

Like for example, the so-called Wuhan lab where this thing was built was literally funded by Bill Gates, right? He’s a fucking American! And Anthony Fauci was like working there. Like, what’s going on?

 

Also they had the World Military games in Wuhan at the same time that Covid was broke out or was released or whatever. We know that it was a genetically engineered disease. Okay, that’s kind of quite something like the World Military Games. So like US military people were there was like 600 guys or 800 guys from the US military in Wuhan at the time when it was released.

 

So the US had people there that could have released it. And you know, there’s a lot of links to people that have links to the ruling class in America. So you know, why would, if the Chinese created a bioweapon, why would they release it in their own country? Wouldn’t you release it in someone else’s country? Like who releases bioweapons in their own country? Like that’s insane!

 

Also there were suppressed reports at the same time that it was released in Wuhan that Covid spontaneously was also released in Iran and in Russia, but it was never reported on in Western media. They just only focused on the Chinese release. That’s kind of interesting. Like the other two, like major American geopolitical enemies or whatever.

 

So yeah, I think that there was something nefarious that went on there. I think it was intentional. It’s beyond a shadow of a doubt that Covid was biologically engineered. Like that’s just confirmed at this point.

 

So the question is, who released it? Would China release a bioweapon in their own country that ended up fucking up their own economy? Or would America do it? Not only did it fuck up the Chinese economy, it greatly benefited the American ruling class.

 

So think about it. Why would China do that?

 

[1:02:34]

 

But anyway, my point is that all of these dynamics are occurring. You could see why elements within Chinese Communist Party would move against Xi because the economy is stagnating. Xi is a hardliner. Xi wants to isolate the Chinese economy from the rest of the world. Doesn’t want American cultural influence, doesn’t want foreign financial interests coming into China, gaining a foothold in the Chinese economy. Doesn’t want Chinese elites developing too close relationships with people in the West, with Western elites, and becoming disloyal to China. Right. He’s a nationalist, and that’s why he has those views. It makes sense.

 

The elements within China that support liberalisation, that want to have a better relationship with the United States, that don’t want to kind of rock the boat, have a war over, potential World War over Taiwan that could destabilise China irrevocably, potentially. They lose a war like that. Like, it could be over for the Communist Party in China who are right now, you know, elites that are doing well, that are rich, successful, whatever, have good positions in Chinese society. Do they want to go to war with America over Taiwan? Do they feel as passionate as Xi does about these nationalist policies? No! A lot of them don’t. And they make public statements that show that they don’t. So if Xi got sick, showed weakness or this weakness that he has at the moment because the economy isn’t doing so well and so on, maybe they’ve chosen this as the time to move because Xi had consolidated so much power, and that’s why we’re seeing this switch up within Chinese politics.

 

But a lot of this is speculative and kind of reading between the lines on a lot of things that people are saying in China. It will become clearer in the coming weeks and months. I think the next plenary session, the fourth plenary session in China is occurring on, like, August. That’s going to be key, seeing how that plays out, you know how Xi behaves, public statements made by other leading figures and so on, that’ll say a lot about whether Xi has been sidelined or at the very least, radically cucked in how much power he has over the Chinese Communist Party and how much other elements of the party are resurging in power and influence.

 

And based upon that, it’ll completely reset the clock on the World War III clock. Is World War III going to happen? Is a war between America and China going to happen this decade? If Xi manages to hold and reconsolidate power and this is all bullshit! Or he can turn it around? Potentially, yes. This could embolden him to go:

 

“Okay, well, I almost got defeated. Now’s the chance for the power and glory. Defeat the United States. The Chinese century beckons. I’m a great man of history!”

 

Invades Taiwan. Boom! World War III! Or Xi can’t come back from this. He’s been defeated. He’s been internally outpositioned. All these top guys are taken out. He’s basically been undermined, and it’s basically over for the Xi era. If that happens, there’s not going to be a war with Taiwan anytime soon.

 

And obviously, the big Trump tariffs that were dumped on China only exacerbated these problems, and they’ll probably go down as a strategic masterstroke, which future generations look back at this. The key is, as well, there was a recent negotiation between the Americans and the Chinese. I think it was in London or something, over a trade agreement between the United States and China, an agreement to bring down their mutual tariffs on one another and so on. What’s kind of interesting about that, Xi said nothing about it. Zero! Wasn’t involved, hasn’t made one public statement about it. It’s a pretty big fucking deal, you would think.

 

But not only has Xi not said anything about it, nobody in the Chinese government has really stated any substance at all about what was negotiated. But Trump walks away from that negotiation immediately. He is saying:

 

“I’ve secured an incredible deal and we’re going to open China up. And it’s an incredible deal with massive progress and my negotiating team, they’re the best in the world!”

 

Why was Trump so happy and why is China not saying anything? Very suspicious.

 

Some people are suspecting that it’s because basically the faction that Trump negotiated with, it’s not Xi’s faction, it’s the faction undermining Xi. And basically, until they can fully cuck go formally or get him to step down while saving face or something, they’re not going to announce the deal. So what’s in that deal? When that deal gets made public again, that’s going to be a key indication of where China is at. Because there’s no way that Xi, based upon his philosophy, his ideology, would be willing to make any concessions to the United States. You know, he’s a staunch nationalist. Whereas, yeah, other elements in the CCP absolutely would, in order to preserve economic stability, because the Chinese economy is not doing great! And their view is that the way that they gain the support of the Chinese people predominantly is through managing the economy well. They don’t have a democracy, they don’t get voted in, but they say:

 

“Qu hey, look, you don’t get to vote in your leaders. But look at the great job that we’re doing. You know, China’s constantly developing. Everyone’s getting richer, everyone’s getting more opportunities, everyone’s making more money. So don’t rock the boat. Just trust the plan!”

 

Right? And that obviously has worked for a certain period of time, but what happens when it stops working? I don’t think a lot of people in the higher ups in the CCP want to find out what happens, and I think a lot of them don’t want to go to war with the United States. I think they’re afraid, and understandably so, because they could get absolutely blasted! Like, even if they were to win, they would take a lot of damage, and it could basically set back the whole project forever. It could destabilise the Chinese Communist Party’s grip on power entirely.

 

I mean, what if the United States there’s certain dams in southern China that some analysts say if you bomb them, it could cause a flood that could kill hundreds of millions of people! If you do a naval blockade on China, it could cause a famine that could kill hundreds of millions of people! Like, the United States is over 7,000 nuclear weapons like the do you really want to have World War III against the power that’s that powerful? And when you’re that vulnerable? A lot of them probably might view Xi as a madman! And the Chinese are not risk takers. They’re not a nation of Hitlers. They’re not a nation of blitzkriegers. They’re not a nation of poker players. You know, they’re a mercantile race of Art of War, you know, Wu Wei, do nothing, win. That’s kind of like the Chinese, you know, philosophy and mentality is being conservative, being harmonious relations and all this gay shit! They don’t have the Faustian spirit.

 

[1:10:09]

 

So basically what I’m saying is that we’re probably at the on the brink here of total chudjack victory. If Xi loses his grip on power, World War 3 will not happen anytime soon. So that radically kind of changes the calculations. And that actually also, I think, explains why Israel might have decided to kick things off with Iran. The Israelis, they might have gained intelligence that China is weak. And they think:

 

“Well, if we try and escalate things with Iran now, the Americans might have more confidence that the Chinese won’t do shit over Taiwan. And so we can start forcing the issue on Iran.”

 

Basically that’s why they chose to move now, partly maybe because Trump is in power, but also partly because, yeah, maybe the China threat isn’t as imminent as as many previously thought, if Xi’s power is weakened.

 

So anyway, big dynamics, I think, like very complicated, lots of moving parts. But yeah, nothing ever happens. Nothing ever fucking happens! Yeah. Relying on China to move world history, I guess, was a mistake. I mean, think about the kind of people we’re dealing with here.

 

So anyway, I think that’s interesting and important to report because from an Australian nationalist perspective, World War III, if it was to happen, would completely change everything. So we kind of have to have our finger on the pulse of like how, like, are we at Defcon4 or like, where are we at on the, is World War III gonna happen rating scale? Because that’s a massive spanner in the works.

 

I’ll go through a few Superchats. I see Ultra Saxon said:

 

“I’d love to see you guys do a stream with Karl Radl from X. Every post of him is a gem and he’s super informative on National Socialism. Respect from England, lads.”

 

Yeah, Karl, I’ve seen his stuff. I would like to do. I think he’s more of like a Twitter guy. I don’t think he does video streams. I never seen him do a video stream before. Maybe I’m wrong, like, correct me if I’m wrong. But yeah, maybe like a Twitter space or something like it would be interesting too. I think I actually proposed that to him and then I got banned from Twitter. But make an alt account and have a conversation. If he was interested, I’d be down to discuss. Seems like his wheelhouse is World War II history and NS German history. That’s obviously quite interesting. Dan3 said:

 

“There are apparently experts saying that China has less than half their official population using salt consumption and other stats to estimate their population. Don’t know this is whether this is propaganda though.”

 

Oh, you’re saying that there’s some estimates that their population is much smaller than they say?

 

Yeah, I mean, I don’t know about that. I don’t think they’d be able to like lie about something that effectively. But you definitely can’t trust the stats you hear out of China. Megawatts 80 said:

 

“Everyone watching should send a few bucks. Hail victory!”

 

Well, I can’t disagree with that. Sector88 said:

 

“Any opinion on the Yanks reviewing the AUKUS agreement? I don’t believe we’ll be getting the Virginia subs until the late 2000s at best. No matter the a administration, unless they somehow double or triple sub production.”

 

Yeah, it, there does seem to be a great lag on that.

 

But I don’t see them ripping up the AUKUS agreement because at the end of the day it’s in the strategic interest of the Americans for us to have better subs. You know, the current subs that the Australian military has basically not going to last much longer. The old subs, they’re going to be decommissioned. We need to have new subs somehow and we don’t have a programme in place to build our own. The Americans aren’t going to want us to have no subs.

 

Also, we’re paying big money for their subs, so of course they’d like to sell them to us. And the nuclear capable subs are important just purely for the fact that, well, you don’t have to refuel. The nuclear reactor lasts like 30 years or whatever. So that’s an incredible capability where you can effectively just stay at the bottom of the ocean as long as you want. Incredible technology. So from a strategic standpoint it’s vital if we want to assist the Americans in engaging in like a naval blockade against China to have that kind of thing. There’s a reason why the Chinese freak out about AUKUS and they don’t want us having nuclear subs is because nuclear subs are effective as fuck! Like they’re incredible technology, and not that many countries have them. Ultra Saxon said:

 

“Joel, have you ever heard of the concept of a Canzak union? You see the idea amongst normie Libs, but I see it being a great long term geostrategic strategy for reuniting and re empowering the Anglo sphere.”

 

Yeah, I mean in principle I don’t necessarily think it would be so bad, but there’s a few things why I don’t think it’s realistic.

 

[1:15:44]

 

Number one, Canada is basically the strategic bitch of the United States. So being able to deal with Canada as an independent state is unlikely. Also Australia’s main allies, the United States and Britain’s main allies, the United States.

 

So this idea that we could all come together and form a union that was somehow not integrated with the United States is unlikely to be something that the United States would be too happy about. So it would only really happen if there was a massive sea change in the respective politics of our three countries. It’s unlikely that that sea change is going to be the same in all three.

 

So let’s say like nationalists, let’s say like we win in Australia. Is libtard Britain or libtard Canada going to want to make some kind of alliance with us? Probably not. And vice versa. So I don’t see it as super likely.

 

Also, there’s radically different. Like, there isn’t a lot of economic trade between the Anglo-sphere countries. Like Australia trades a lot with them. Like all three trade a lot with America. We don’t trade much with each other. Like the Canadian economy is very similar to Australia’s in the sense it has a lot of minerals and so on. We both need to trade with like manufacturing powers to like, get the most out of our economy. So like, economic integration doesn’t make as much sense as it does in say, Europe.

 

Also, we’re geographically quite isolated from one another in different regions of the world.

 

So I think, yeah, the argument is, oh, but we’ve got similar culture, similar forms of government, good relations, similar heritage. Yeah, okay, like, but why does that mean? Like, what would the union be? Just like a union where like, we’re already in a military alliance with one another, basically. Like Canada and Britain are both in NATO. Australia’s not in NATO, but we’re like a NATO partner or whatever. So like, what would it really do? Like freedom of movement? Again, like say, like we take power in Australia as nationalists. Do we want to have freedom of movement with Britain and Canada? No, because then they’re going to like flood Australia with nons. I’d rather just have an immigration policy that takes White people from those countries. So yeah I don’t really see what like the point of Canzuk Union is like from a strategic standpoint. So I don’t really see it happening.

 

But like, let’s say we took power in Australia, we would look to take over New Zealand. As well, that’s undoubtedly true. And then we would probably look to support nationalist forces in Britain as best we could. And then if we that was successful, then we’d form an alliance on those terms. Be very different than the Canzuk Union.

 

Then, like, let’s say, like our guys are running Australia and Britain and there was this idea of getting the empire back together and building an imperial federation that fuses the two countries. We could look into it down the track.

 

But yeah, it would be difficult probably because at that point, like the Australian identity, the British identity had diverged so much at that point. We’re on opposite sides of the planet, completely different strategic objectives. Like is Britain going to want to fight to the death to defend Australia’s geopolitical interests and vice versa? You know, maybe they are, maybe they aren’t. But that’s usually you get those kinds of alliances between countries that border each other. Dan3 also said. Oh no, I already read that.

 

Modern World Reject, he just hailed! Awesome! Hail you. Modern world reject said:

 

“How World War III affect nationalist politics in Australia?”

 

Well, if it was to happen, massively! Number one, the regime here would have to completely change its attitude on racism. You know, they would basically have to allow anti-Chinese racism in society because they would have to find a rationale basically to either mass incarcerate or mass deport almost, 2 million Chinese people that live in Australia. There’s about one Chinese person for every 10 White people in Australia. Like that’s how you gonna go to war with China and just allow them to walk around and be, hold high ranking positions in society and trust them like it’s not feasible. Also if you want to fight a war you need patriotism.

 

So you’re gonna have to wind back the woke shit, allow people to be kind of racist. If you’re going to want to try and convince young White Australian men to fight a World War, you can’t keep flooding their country with foreigners. You can’t keep pushing the current like ridiculously woke anti-White agenda down their throats. They won’t fight for you! They won’t sign up. So there would have to be a completely new deal made. Like the government would have to make a lot of concessions to us.

 

And I think after the war everything would be radically different. I think after a war like that, it would become defining in world history, in Australian history. The memory of World War II would fade and the whole paradigm of the post World War II international order would collapse. And it’d be a Great Reset basically. Not in the kind of Claus Schwabian sense, but it’d be like a full reset basically of ideologically, historically and so on.

 

[1:21:40]

 

And ultimately if Australia came out of it intact, I think it’d be good for nationalism. I think nationalism would grow in a post World War III Australia much more quickly and more forcefully than you know, in the current order. It’d be a great shake up, a great reality check.

 

Megawatt said:

 

“Touch on the SA political donation laws. Will this go national?”

 

I have to read up on it first. Not too aware of South Australia’s political donation laws. Rygo Weber said:

 

“Joel, will you or Blair be running as Senators in the next election? I think you would be quite effective. Thanks for the show.”

 

Yeah, we’re looking at doing something like that. Obviously we’ve got to launch the party. It’s a long time to the next federal election. You got to decide what we want to do with the state elections that happened before then. So exactly how it all fits together is a bit open ended because there’s a long way between now and then. There’s a lot to consider. Yeah, we’re gonna have a crack.

 

What else we got here. On Entropy Racist Aristocrats, he said, this is directed at Blair after last week:

 

“Blair, when Joel violates liberal norms, for example, equating the desire for a White man to marry an African with marrying a dog. Why the knee jerk reaction to sheepishly moderated. Who are you hoping to placate? Seems rather inexplicably explicably discordant.”

 

Okay, well that’s kind of funny. Says here:

 

“Joel, Cameron McGregor has a worthwhile fourth turning influence. Take positing America and Australia, by inference remains in the adolescent stage of development. He’s a coming war of reintegration of the state and national White Identity driven polarisation, catalyzing White unification and ending pluralism and disintegration. He sees Whites awakening to race, the jewish question and distrust of modern capitalism as preconditions for state transition to adulthood. You two could have a fruitful chat.”

 

Well, I don’t know who that is, but sounds good. So if he’s out there, he wants to get in touch. By all means, yeah.

 

I will say another couple things, another couple things that have been on my mind this week that are interesting to observe. So whilst you’re seeing these big kind of moves in China, behind the scenes shifting of power in America, you’re also seeing an interesting dynamic emerge where I remember when Musk and Trump had a falling out, they then kind of patched things up and I said I don’t see this lasting. Well, I think I was correct about that. Musk has been very vocal over the past week in his opposition to the so-called Big Beautiful Bill. And there’s reports that he’s going to fund Thomas Massie, who is the Israel critical Republican, the only Republican that’s not taking money from AIPAC or whatever. He’s going to fund his primary campaign because Trump is backing his opponent because Trump hates Massey because Massey’s basically not going along with the Zionist agenda.

 

So that’s interesting to see that Musk is going to step in and take Massey’s side and drive this kind of wedge between using the Israel issue to drive a wedge within the Republican Party.

 

Because as I said, Musk’s position is awkward in American politics because he’s completely abandoned the Left. The Left hate him! The Left maybe hate him more than Trump because he’s said and done maybe things that are more radical than what even Trump has done. Well, just objectively are like he’s throwing Romans and kind of statements that he’s made. But also he didn’t successfully win over Republicans. Musk is awkward, he’s a nerd. He’s not even American. And he’s kind of like a [word unclear] to Trump’s movement. Trump has organic charisma. He’s a real American. He’s beloved by the people and he’s the president.

 

So the average, you know, red blooded, Right-wing American sides with Trump against Musk. And also Trump doesn’t see himself as beholden to Musk. He sees Musk is below him in the hierarchy. Doesn’t matter how many hundreds of millions Musk kind of threw at him. Musk wasn’t able to get what he wanted out of Trump. He wasn’t able to get what he wanted out of MAGA, if you will.

 

And so now Musk is in political no man’s land. He’s the richest man in America on paper. He is entirely dependent his business models basically on American government subsidies. So he needs political power on his side. But he’s alienated both major sides of politics. So what do you do in a situation like that? Well, if you’re the world’s, world’s richest man on paper, you’re probably going to try and fund a third faction into existence. And that’s what you see his early moves.

 

So I could see Musk making bigger moves going ahead and it could be a real kind of I don’t like Musk in the sense that he, any kind of like pro-White stuff that he said to try and like win us over, he kind of like showed his true colours on the H1B Indian saga where he sided with stuffing America full of Indian H1B Visa types as opposed to preserving the White majority.

 

So that shows where he stands slike he’s not truly loyal to us or our concerns.

 

But nevertheless, when you see inter elite competition, it’s a good thing. It means that there’s dynamism in politics. It means it opens up opportunities for dissidents because you’re probably going to get more free speech, more open exchange of ideas, more dynamism in politics if you have two rival factions on the Right competing for the approval of the Right-wing masses. And what Musk showed through that whole H1B Visa saga is that he does care about maintaining a positive public image and that he has political ambitions.

 

[1:28:31]

 

So it could be a real challenger to like the Peter Thiel Donald Trump network. J.D. Vance, you know, is the heir apparent to Trump as president. If Musk can find a candidate that’s capable of taking on Vance, Vance is going to have a real challenger with hundreds of millions behind him. And I said before, if Tucker Carlson wanted to run for president against J.D. Vance, for example. I think Elon Musk would give him hundreds of millions of dollars and I think he’d beat J.D. Vance.

 

So that’s a situation to monitor as well. Big dynamics in America and China, like deep politics, elite politics that could really define what direction the wind is going to flow, going to blow over the next few years and kind of define the next decade or generation in international politics.

 

So that’s something that I noticed as well, something to keep an eye on. But an issue that I wanted to discuss as well, to kind of end the show, I guess, is I’ve got a Superchat coming. I’ll read a couple of these and then I’ll discuss this. Rabbi Shlomo Noisberg said:

 

“A hundred dollars. What do you need $90 for? I’m not going to give you an $80 Superchat to a racist, anti-semite. That $70 is mine. All right, fine, I’ll give you $60. But this is not a gift, it’s a loan and I want interest.”

 

Well, you’re not getting interest. I don’t even know who the hell you are. Dad3 said:

 

“Do you think the English will have a great man like Hitler and Napoleon in a few decades after the Civil War? Maybe three original Germanic great powers are supposed to have one after a disaster!”

 

I want to know what kind of question that is.

 

Yeah, I think that’s all the Superchats, but yeah, like one thing I want to discuss is the issue of settler colonialism. There’s been a lot of discussion precipitated, I think, by anti-Israel discourse. There’s been a lot of discussion on the Right. The dissonant Right. About the issue of settler colonialism. And there’s basically two major schools of thought. One is we should oppose ourselves to the idea of settler colonialism and talk about jewish supremacy and talk about how Israel is this horrible evil colonial power who’s stealing away land from the Palestinians. And this will help us educate White people on the jews and show that the jews are the bad guys, not Whites, and that Whites don’t want to hurt anyone. And we just want to have our own countries too. And yeah, and we can kind of focus all of the ire that’s directed against imperialism and colonialism and so on against jews and that this would be in our interest.

 

And sometimes these people say if you don’t agree with this, you must be jewish or Joel is a secret Zionist because he doesn’t agree with us.

 

The other position, my position, is that we should oppose Israel on the basis that Israel is a parasitical and subversive force of zionism, let’s say in general, because it’s not just the state of Israel, it’s also the jewish diasporas that live in our countries. They’re a subversive and parasitical force on our countries, White countries, Australia, America and particular Britain, so on. They’ve completely taken over the Right-wing. They have incredible power over the media and they use their power and influence to siphon off resources and support for Israel even though Australia and America and Britain have no strategic interest whatsoever in Israel. Like actually. They’ve captured politicians in America through incredibly nefarious means, like where they’re running paedophile networks and shit like that! They have [word unclear] like British monarchs and you know, elites from across society. Who knows how deep that goes. This is why we should oppose Israel. They’ve dragged us into wars we had no business fighting for no strategic benefit to ourselves. They taken over the Right-wing and redirect the Right-wing towards, in our countries towards their interests as opposed to representing the interests of our actual nation and people. This is what we should be criticising them for what they’re doing to us!

 

Like in Australia recently, you know, we’ve been going, doing a lot of activism and discussing a lot about the involvement of the organised jewish community and probably the Mossad in leveraging false flag, so-called anti-semitic attacks to push through an agenda to attack our free speech, to make it illegal for us to criticise jews in Israel and other racial groups as well.

 

That’s why we should be criticising jews. We should be explaining to the people of White Australians, White Americans and so on what jews are doing to them and why jews are their enemy. I think going on about like bleeding hearts about the poor Palestinians and this kind of shit is the wrong trajectory because it plays into the same moral framework that is used to describe how the poor Aboriginals and the horrors of colonialism, White colonialism or you know, the poor African slaves in America or etc. Etc, etc. It’s the same morality and framing that is used as a stick to beat the White man. And it’s generally appeals to Leftists who are anti-White, who hate the British Empire, who hate the White Australia Policy, who hate the racist founding of America, blah blah, blah blah, who hate us and everything that we stand for.

 

So to me that’s insane! The argument they make is:

 

“Well if you try and if you try and defend settler colonialism, if you say oh well, Australia was built on settler colonialism, then you’re just being the bad guy.”

Apparently you’re being the bad guy. You’re playing into the narrative of the enemy. Apparently this is what these people say. And no one’s going to support your White nationalist movement. What you have to do is say:

 

“You know what, I agree with the Left, Aboriginals were treated horribly and we don’t deserve to have this country because we’re horrible colonial occupiers!”

 

[1:35:31]

 

And somehow acknowledging all of that is going to help us to advance White nationalism. Like it doesn’t make any sense to me. It’s very simple. This country was built on settler colonialism. This country was built on our people coming here, conquering it, taking it off the people who were previously here, asserting our dominance over it, securing it for our people, fighting for it, defending it, building it up into what it is.

 

And that’s how shit works, that’s how nature works. We live in a dog-eat-dog world. Everything anyone has in this world was taken off someone else at some point. There’s a finite amount of resources on this planet. There’s not enough to go around. Some people win, some people lose. I want to win, I don’t want to lose. And when you assert your interest in this world, someone loses out. There’s never a way to be a totally nice guy and for everyone to get everything that they want. It just doesn’t work like that. That’s not how God made Earth, the universe. If you don’t like that, take it up with God. But that’s how it is, that’s reality.

 

And this idea that we need to be like 20th century liberals, we can’t assert the morality of any of our ancestors before 20th century, post World War II liberalism. We can’t say the British Empire was glorious! We can’t say the colonisation of Australia was glorious! That we can’t assert the interests of White people and White Australians just because we are White and because no one’s going to look after us but ourselves. It’s ridiculous!

 

That’s a message that makes complete sense. I believe in it. And I don’t think White people are going to be able to do what is necessary to take back control of our countries unless they’re willing to accept a message like that. I don’t think this so-called normie demographic that exists out there that is willing to be White nationalists only so long as White nationalists chungus pilled and respect everyone and don’t want to assert their superiority of everyone and want to like eke out space for everyone’s human rights and treat everyone amazingly and love everybody. I don’t think these people really exist. I think people who need to be placated to like that actually are against us and won’t embrace our politics no matter how chungus, no matter how moral fagged we make it.

 

And I also believe that the average person is capable of understanding that we live in a world of struggle. That life is struggle. That you got to fight for it, you got to fight for your existence on this planet. And that either we’re going to fight for our collective existence as a people or it’s going to be taken from us and that those are the two options on the table. We need a reality check! We need to come come to reality on this question. We can’t live in this illusion that if we just frame things with the Right moral arguments and make the right amount of concessions that we can somehow negotiate a perfectly nice and non-violent and non-controversial way for us to continue existing on this planet and to continue having our own countries. It’s the mentality of a fucking cuck. It’s the mentality of a loser.

 

We have strength as a race. Incredible collective strength! If we come together and assert our interests together. If we’re willing to come together and fight for our existence, we can secure it. That’s what it comes down to.

 

And I’m not going to forsake the incredible actions of my ancestors. I’m going to venerate them. What they did to create this country. Stealing countries of other peoples is something that few peoples are actually capable of I don’t consider it to be an immoral thing, I think you either fight for it or you don’t deserve it. If we lost World War II to the Japanese, if we ultimately one day lose this country to other races, other forces, ultimately we’d have no one to blame but ourselves for not fighting with enough valiance, for not mustering enough strength and power to hold on to what is ours. We have to take responsibility to secure our own future. No one else on this planet owes us anything and we don’t owe them anything. That’s reality.

 

And I want to live in reality. I don’t want to live in this fucked gay ideological delusion that some people in this movement want to live in. And I don’t want to pretend to believe things I don’t believe.

 

A lot of people say:

 

“Hey, look man I don’t really believe this shit either, but it’s going to help us make jews look bad or it’s going to help us win over moderates to our position if we just pretend to believe in it.”

 

I don’t believe in pretending to believe in shit! Pretending to believe in shit is inauthentic. It’s not how we’re going to convince people to stand side by side with us and fight for an objective, is pretending to believe things we don’t believe.

 

The way that we’re going to get men to stand behind us and fight to believe in our cause, believe in our movement, is to actually believe what we believe and say it proudly and openly! To have faith in our ideas, that our ideas are inherently have so much truth and potency and value that they will succeed. That’s how we’re going to win!

 

And yeah I’ve had this argument before with people. They say:

 

“Oh, I’m a universal nationalist. I believe in nationalism for all people.”

 

Well, that’s a nice thing for you to say. So are you going to go and fight for Algerian nationalism? Are you going to go and fight the Sri Lankan nationalism? No, you don’t actually give a fuck about Azerbaijani nationalism or Venezuelan nationalism. You say you believe in everyone’s right being equal to having a nation, but you’re not willing to fight for everyone’s nation. You’re willing to fight for your nation and maybe some brother nations that you have.

 

[1:42:01]

 

So maybe if you’re an Australian, you’d be willing to fight for Britain because that’s the land of your ancestors. You’re willing to fight for Ireland or whatever. If the Americans had a civil war, you’d be willing to go and fight for the White team because they’re our ethnic cousins or something like that. Okay, that makes sense.

 

But if you aren’t really willing to fight and die for it, you don’t actually believe in it, to any significant or deep level that it’s of consequence.

 

So why can’t you just say you’re an Australian nationalist and just say you want to fight for a White Australia? Anyone who has a problem with that, you want to crush them. You want to crush them and destroy them because it’s us or them! That’s what we believe in. Why isn’t that good enough? Good enough for me.

 

Maybe it’s not good enough for you’re a liar. Like, you’re just a liar. You don’t actually really believe what you’re saying. You’re trying to come up with a strategy, like a marketing, like a moral marketing strategy where you pretend to have this morality that’s nice to everyone so that people will allow you to have your own country or something. It doesn’t mean that we should have like zero allies or zero respect for other people. But let’s be real here. Why can’t you’re asserting your own interests in your own and the future of your own people?

 

Like and for example, in Australia, we have a military alliance with Japan. The Japanese are a completely different people. I think the Japanese are an incredible nation, incredible cultural achievements, whatever. I wouldn’t fight for Japan unless it was in Australia. I’d fight for Australia if we were like allied in a war together and it made sense, it was in our interest to fight together against a mutual enemy. But I wouldn’t fight for Japan. I don’t think it would be a good thing if Japan was like, wiped off the face of the planet necessarily. I think they’re interesting, cool people. But I wouldn’t be willing to die to save Japan. So I can respect Japan. Maybe we could have an alliance with Japan if it’s in our interest. But I’m not a Japanese nationalist.

 

I don’t ultimately believe in some metaphysical right that the Japanese have to exist. Ultimately, it’s the responsibility of the Japanese to secure their own existence, and it’s the responsibility of White Australians to secure our own existence. And it’s the responsibility of Palestinians to secure their own existence and the responsibility of whatever group of people it is to secure their own existence on this planet. That’s how it works. That’s the iron Law of Nature. So Modern World reject said:

 

“We cannot negotiate for our existence. We must secure it through struggle.”

 

And he hailed and yeah, that’s basically the essence of my view. Someone said here:

 

“Joel didn’t get the Rabbi Noseberg meme.”

 

No, I did get the meme. I just didn’t think it was that funny. So I did like a kind of deadpan delivery.

 

Now, what else have we got here? I think that’s basically a good show for the evening. So give me some feedback. Did you still enjoy the show, even though it was just me riding solo? Don’t usually do this. I usually have the foil of having someone to talk to. It feels a bit weird just sitting here speaking into, like a laptop. Like, not talking to another human being. Feels a bit inorganic. But I’ve been doing this a long time, so I could still kind of sell it, I think. Jack Brady, given some respect:

 

“Excellent monologue.”

 

Well, I appreciate that. Friend of the show. Obviously been on the show before. High praise.

 

But, yeah, everyone’s seemed to enjoy the stream, so I’m glad you watched. I’m glad you listened. And yeah, got some things coming up. There was an interview by this guy called Hermes from the United States. He does like these street interviews that have been going viral lately. He’s obviously like a nationalist from America. Seems like a solid dude. I haven’t really spoken to him much before, but he interviewed Tom earlier this week, which you can find, I think, on Rumble. And we’re doing a collaboration soon. I’ll put out on my social media on Telegram, when we’re gonna go live. I think soon. I think maybe like Sunday, Australian time, Saturday night American time was the plan. But, yeah, I’ll put it out when it’s all, like, ready to go with links and stuff.

 

And I’m also going to do a collaboration with Ferryman from Canada next week. I think there’s a new Codex India documentary that’s going to be released. And they wanted us to do a kind of Watch Party promotion. The previous one was pretty funny. It was kind of like this David Attenborough narrating, like Pajeets in the Wild. I’m sure a lot of you have seen it. So anyhow, I don’t know what to expect. [chuckling] I haven’t seen it yet, but should be funny.

 

And yeah, there’s a few other things happening. So keep an eye on social media, keep in touch and we’ll fill you in on when we’re doing more content when we’re doing more activism, etc. And if you’re in Australia, join the fucking movement! ! WhiteAustralia.org, WhiteAus.org. If you don’t want to come and be a member of the NSN, marching around on the street, doing street activism, you can join and just come to the community events. You can come and train with us. Kickboxing, weightlifting, barbecues, seminars, we’re putting on more events. Come get involved in the community. At least get networked with fellow White nationalists.

 

And if you don’t even have time for that, at the very least, sign up as a supporter. Put your name down so we can get registered as a political party. We’re getting closer and closer to hitting the target. We haven’t even done an official launch yet. We will get more than enough signatures. Be a member of the party. We need members. So at least sign up as a member or even better, come and join the community. Come and get involved in a more direct capacity. A lot of events are going to be organised through the rest of the year.

 

[1:49:04]

 

The only way that we can turn around the political situation in this country is if White nationalists in Australia come together, join the Organisation, join the party and build a movement that can actually change things. We have the foundation of a movement that has the potential to really make an impact, which we haven’t had in this country for a long time. We’ve created that foundation.

 

The only way that that foundation can go into something actually tangible, making like, real, meaningful change is if everyone gets behind us and backs us. Even if it’s just as simple as just signing up as a member of our political party, which really is not asking for very much at all!

 

So WhiteAustralia.org. Sign up! Join up! You know, don’t you want to see us enter politics in Australia? Wouldn’t that bring you joy? Wouldn’t that be fucking awesome? Like, oh, you don’t want like me and Blair and Tom and shit running for office. You want to fucking vote for, who you voting for? Craig Kelly? You want to vote for Ralph Babet? You want to vote for Pauline Hanson? This shit sucks, man! Help us give awesome candidates! Our policies are going to be amazing! We’re going to break the fucking news cycle. We’re going to have the most interesting political party probably in the whole world. Fucking why have you not signed up yet? Sign up, help us win!

 

But yeah, anyway, so that’s the end of the stream. I hope you enjoyed it. And White power, blood and honour! Hail victory! See you all next time.

 

[1:51:06]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/11/2025 = 35)

J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
There is no question, they all need to leave
9 likes

Report
J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
You know why they removed the death penalty. Because if they used it in this case then it would be injected into the public consciousness as a solution and then the sheep might get ideas about applying it to other criminals.
7 likes

Report
JoshRecessionberg
Supporter
6 days ago
Society is falling apart with Jewish ‘democracy’
6 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
J0hnC0nn0r
5 days ago
Lets state the obvious
0 likes

Report
Lynchmob11
5 days ago
Awesome show. You should do a weekly solo show where you break down geopolitical events, since the other show is mainly centered upon Aussie politics.
5 likes

Report
SueNewson
5 days ago
you done a great job!
5 likes

Report
natogroyper
5 days ago
Great show, these type of shows that you do where you break down geopolitics from a Australian nationalist perspective are brilliant and its important. It’s something that we need more of. You really come into your own doing this type of content mate 🫡
5 likes

Report
leibekohne
6 days ago
Usury free world economy will solved lots of problems including wives staying at home. Also the wars will disappear no financing jew banks. In modern world China has never necessary ability to fight a long war. They could do nothing against small Japan. If that should happens the will end of humanity. Those problems, can be overcome by changing the communist China into Monarchy as used to be.
4 likes

Report
StevenGurr
3 days ago
Kill all pedo fags
3 likes

Report
katana17
6 days ago
[Joel Davis – Nothing is Happening, But It Will – Jun 26, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/28/joel-davis-nothing-is-happening-but-it-will-jun-26-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss ZOG vs Iran, Mark Latham vs Minns, the caravan hoax, Trump jews and Epstein, Israel with 200 nukes, JFK assassination, boomers being selfish, Holohoax Card wearing out, WWIII with China vs ZOG, jews not being flashy, Joel dreams of an Aston Martin, miscegenation, Human rights, NSN childcare policy, and current events, etc. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 21,471 – Duration: 125 mins]
2 likes

Delete
J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
I dont agree with your idea to pay the mothers to stay at home instead of childcare, as that doesnt address the root cause of why the wahmen are working in the first place. Usually to pay for the usury loan and every other fucking rip off corporate swine and their small hat masters are perpetrating on the White race. Anything that undermines the ponzi scheme, aka forcing a collapse is the only option.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
JoshRecessionberg
Supporter
5 days ago
You are a fool. Who is going to support a party advocating for an economic collapse? It is more like an economic transition that will have to be done smoothly and professionally in order to reinvigorate White Australia. Implementing policies in phases is the best approach. Talking about collapse is for low IQ blackpilled degenerates.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
J0hnC0nn0r
5 days ago
Sure thing fuck wit. Lets move jew money for daycare to middle class welfare, banksters dont care they still get their usury bucks, inflate property prices based on the extra income and keep the ponzi scheme going. Just to stick to your ad hominem attacks and idiocy, you clearly are a stupid zoomer cunt rash because this shit was done under Howard and led to much of this fucking mess. The fact you still think this is a viable “policy” when the same Whites sucking off the govt tit will turn on NSN etc when the welfare tap is turned off (transitioned as you put it like a tranny) truly shows how stupid and short sighted you are.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
1Antonius
3 days ago
People are too degenerate to play moderate with them. They’ll still betray you, it’s in their nature.
0 likes
Report
leibekohne
6 days ago
therefore NSN you must stop drinking even beer drink Kombucha instead. Never slacken be vigilant You must be hard, strong without any remorse and it will require blood, because you waited to long, because you let yourselves your parents to be fooled whilst the internal enemy never stopped only intensified after WW2 He mesmerized us and made us imbecilic morons murdered us lied to us stole from us killed us used us exploited us destroyed us to merely 6% of world population and going down faster and faster to total distinction of Aryan goyim white race wake up shiksa cunts and fight; teach abusive fanatical communist police a hard lesson, give it back.
2 likes

Report
MPCV
Supporter
6 days ago
o/ HH
2 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
4 days ago
To your point Joel, on the study that covered the 33% drop in fertility of women who go the jab vs those that didn’t… as a woman who previous to Covid, had no fertility issues, I stared having lots of issues with my cycle as well as miscarriages as soon as the vax came out. My husband and I did not get it but most all of our family members did. This is an experience that many other women (not vaccinated) I have spoken with share in common. Potentially due to vaccine shedding and or what they’ve been putting in our water (I.e. Dr Ardis’ work shows this). Either way, agree with what you said about the massive wealth transfer that was going on during covid, and it eerily all began in nov of 2019. Very few people were talking about what was going on with all the major corporations and financial elites at the time. They definitely took advantage though to hurt us health wise, in our economy and as a society. Hopefully enough are awake now to not get fooled again! Great show!
2 likes

Report
Bigboy6669
5 days ago
bump
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
6 days ago
Wuhan Institute entered a partnership with Peter Daszak/ Ecohealth Alliance. Special Cancer virus programs, ‘defense’ programs, theres beeb decades of work on G.O.F virus manipulation. See pizzapicklespur on X, also Charles Rixey (prometheusshrugged.org.) See Major Murphy’s release of the D.E.F.U.S.E document. Rixey will take you there. Research into Covid amyloidogenic properties continues @ mccairndojo.com. Support the doc; https://rumble.com/v6uyxpb-lab-updates-synthesizing-amyloidogenic-fibrin.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
6 days ago
https://t.wtyl.live/videos/browse?s=1
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
5 days ago
succinct overview; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OHBkkZeqms
0 likes

Report
TripleGas
Verified
5 days ago
need to kick out and block nons from entry before implementing anything like paying for mothers to stay home or it’s just another incentive for them to come and breed.
0 likes

Report
Kroninn
Supporter
5 days ago
Taiwan has around 2 million private gun owners. I dont think it would be too easy for China to invade them. Especially with the Philipines and others helping them.
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
4 days ago
Colac constitutional restoration conference in Colac upcoming late July; https://rumble.com/v6vqyl7-2-seminars-26th-27th-july-augusto-zimmermann-darren-dixon-and-tim-dwyer.html
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Trump is not American either. His mother is from Scotland. And his father could be a German jew if you look at Fred Trump’s physiognomy. Trump is also a New Yorker.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Trump is not founding stock American like us that have been here since the 1600s.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Israel sucks at colonization. Look at a settler colonial nation that was White, and had no outside funding. America, Australia, Canada. Jews have all the money on the world and still can’t make a nation larger than new jersey.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Jews are the laziest parasite bastards ever known. They should have listened to Hitler when he said they can live comfortably on Madagascar, but they resisted, now their final fate will be worse.
0 likes

Report
amacc14
Supporter
4 days ago
Democracy is fake and stupid. Listen to us, we’re sitting around, brainstorming how to get VOTES. Pathetic.
0 likes

Report
localsussybaka
4 days ago
The political analysis gets more compelling each day.
0 likes

Report
MattOosty
3 days ago
A stream/space with Karl would be amazing
0 likes

Report
PhooeyPhoxide
21 hours ago
Joel overrates the CCP. They can’t even take Taiwan. No way China is even going to put a dent in the New World Order.
0 likes

Report
BrossefStalin
5 days ago
Blair is so fragile. Always talking about how tired he is or how he feels weird. He had to get up early and it took him over the edge? Man up
-2 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript